Claim OwnershipRebutting a Murderer
Subscribed: 3,099Played: 38,859
Subscribe
© Copyright iHeartRadio
Description
Is Steven Avery from Making A Murderer Guilty? Rebutting A Murderer Podcast gives new facts and insights about the case
20 Episodes
Reverse
1As a new season of "Making a Murderer" opens, Dan O'Donnell debunks the experiments that Steven Avery's new attorney performs in an effort to prove his innocence.
"Making a Murderer" devotes a lot of attention to Steven Avery attorney Kathleen Zellner's words, but as Dan O'Donnell demonstrates, her actions tell a completely different story.
"Making a Murderer" devotes a lot of attention to Steven Avery attorney Kathleen Zellner's words, but as Dan O'Donnell demonstrates, her actions tell a completely different story.
Dan O'Donnell debunks "Making a Murder's" claims about a decision freeing Brendan Dassey and new evidence Steven Avery's attorney says could free him.
Dan O'Donnell answers the biggest untruths that Steven Avery and "Making a Murderer" have told this season.
Dan O'Donnell dismantles two of the most dishonest claims that Steven Avery's attorney makes in "Making a Murderer's" second season
Dan O'Donnell takes on "Making a Murderer's" increasingly desperate claims about Steven Avery's innocence.
Dan O'Donnell debunks a dishonest theory that "Making a Murderer" concocts about Teresa Halbach's day planner
Dan O'Donnell rebuts "Making a Murderer's" last, most desperate claims as Season 2 comes to a close.
Dan O'Donnell paints a vastly different picture of Steven Avery than the sympathetic one 'Making a Murderer' did.
Dan O'Donnell debunks the supposed motive for law enforcement to frame Steven Avery
Dan O'Donnell takes closer look at compelling DNA evidence that points directly to Steven Avery
Dan O'Donnell thoroughly outlines the evidence against Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey, focusing in particular on Teresa Halbach's car key
As Steven Avery's trial begins, Dan O'Donnell dismantles the defense's conspiracy theory point by point
Dan O'Donnell continues to pick apart the conspiracy theory, focusing in particular on the charred remains found in Steven Avery's burn pit
Dan O'Donnell takes on the single most dishonest moment in 'Making a Murderer,' when Steven Avery's attorneys find a vial of his blood
Steven Avery's trial comes to a conclusion, and Dan O'Donnell debunks 'Making a Murderer's' claims about improper jury conduct
As Brendan Dassey's trial begins, Dan O'Donnell proves that his confession was both truthful and completely voluntary
Dan O'Donnell concludes his rebuttal by answering the lingering questions 'Making a Murderer' asks after Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey are convicted
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
United States
Why does he repeatedly pronounce "vague" as "vagg?" I hate that my brain refuses to just ignore it. 🤦🏼♀️
So they'd have to use a shovel or something to move the body from the pit to the barrel after it was partially burned in the pit. did anyone look for and find a shovel?
ok, so i really wanted to give this podcast a chance. but there is too many baised opinions. theres no "ok this part is believable" or "they covered this part ". but hes working too hard to eliminate every small detail of the show. obviously there are certain baises in the documentary on Netflix, it was created to show he could and is innocent. it shows the real life nonsense that is our court system and how small towns deal with big cases. it is defenses job to... put up a defense, find anything they can to prove innocence. i can honestly say there are certain aspects showing his guilt and some showing the evidence found is ridiculous. the whole point is that we have no clue what happened. but all in all should never and need to stop harrassment on the familys and prosecutors.
I presume that this entire podcast was written by the likes of Ken Kratz? It's filled with nothing but lies, fabricated evidence, illogical scenarios and inconsistencies throughout. I particularly love how they are quick to dismiss the complete lack of blood evidence in Steven's home by simply stating that he had time to clean it up...Yes, of course, and he also took the time to remove every trace of DNA, fiber, hair, and fingerprint, all the while managing to carefully and strategically replace all the dirt and dust found in the trailer. However, being a gracious fellow, he decided to not only keep the car on his lot, he also opted to leave behind the blood stains in the vehicle for law enforcement to find. Yup, sure makes sense to me.
this show is even more bias than making a murderer, ignores even more evidence than this guy is claiming making a murderer ignores
psshh
another issue I had with Brain Fingerprinting thing is that they only questioned him on their theory made up after a few experiments. so if their lightly experimented theory is incorrect, obviously his brain won't recognize it. they should have done it with a variety of scenarios. but the easy excuse out of that was that he heard all that stuff in trial. so... pointless test.
How can you talk like that the whole time?
I definitely think that Zellner's experiments were not done 100% correctly. The interesting fact is that you have a blood expert panel telling you what type of evidence should have been discovered through their decades of experience and how they were in such disbelief that the evidence "discovered" actually matches with the prosecutions narrative. In addition, I like that you clearly state your opinion in your podcast. It's much more clear about the bias than the Netflix series, since they don't mention that they are for Steven Avery's release but the way it is filmed it definitely speaks for itself. However, in your rebuttal for the experiments you pick the ones that you think are flawed but you don't mention anything about the amount of DNA found on the keys and on the hood latch and how it does not match with "touch DNA." Regardless of her experiments, there are a barrage of inconsistencies in this case. Broken chain of custodies.. etc. It's incredible how so many of the people invo
makes some good points, but reaches pretty far (as far as the Netflix show at times) on others