Antiques Roadshow Detours
Subscribed: 10,633Played: 55,759
Subscribe
Description
Ever wondered what happens to the treasures featured on America’s beloved ANTIQUES ROADSHOW after the cameras leave town? ANTIQUES ROADSHOW DETOURS tracks down the juicy afterlives of your favorite finds from PBS’s hit series. Hosted by longtime Roadshow producer Adam Monahan, this podcast dives deep into mysteries, secrets, and surprises as each episode takes a thrilling “detour” into a single ROADSHOW object, astonishing and amusing listeners with every turn. A production of GBH and distributed by PRX.
Antiques Roadshow is a trademark of the BBC and Detours is a trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation.
79 Episodes
Reverse
Top Podcasts
The Best New Mark Levin Podcast Right Now - March 2025The Best New VINCE Podcast Right Now - March 2025The Best New Joe Rogan Experience Podcast Right Now - March 2025The Best New Sports Podcast Right Now - March 2025The Best New Business Podcast Right Now - March 2025The Best New News Podcast Right Now - March 2025The Best New Comedy Podcast Right Now - March 2025The Best New True Crime Podcast Right Now - March 2025
You've posted 11 reruns. When do we get new content?
g? z v
🔴✅📺📱💻ALL>Movies>WATCH>ᗪOᗯᑎᒪOᗩᗪ>LINK>👉https://co.fastmovies.org
I think this just highlights the integrity of the show and the good nature of the appraiser. Glad to know they're all human as well. :)
_Gift_ is a noun or past participle. It is not a verb. The verb is _give,_ and a thing is _given_, not _gifted._
I didn't hear anything in this story to indicate that the club was stolen or in any way misappropriated. In fact, the Tongan academic seemed to use some very loose language to imply that this object is a living ancestor, a view I'm not convinced other Tongans would share, but one that clearly fits in certain quasi-academic fields that sanctify and project victimhood. If the Tongans at the time thought this object was a living member of their society, then why did they sell it or give it away? Maybe they didn't think of it that way, but then, this would be a lost opportunity for a social-science academic to tell a story of imagined victimhood. It's a dangerous thing to suggest that cultures or genetic sub-groups should not mix, and to enforce it even through possession of artifacts. (Stolen objects are obviously a different matter.)
Thanks
It’s Mr. Belvedere.
Are you recording new shows?
fascinating stories!