Traditional Press Podcast

Ever wonder how a monarchy could get started in today's world? There are only about three different ways that a monarchy could get started in our post-modern world. 1. The warrior king coming to save us on his white horse (or white helicopter as the case may be)2. Elections where the people decide that it is time for the return of the king3. Grass roots efforts effort to establish a family as a local baron, duke, count, etc., with the eventual intent to establish small, local kingdomsToday, monarchy is not accepted as a real form of government, and the reason for this is the abandonment of traditional values such a faith and family across the world, but that does not mean that it is impossible to try and bring tradition back! Every effort should be made to carry on the traditions of hierarchy and organized religion, and monarchy is a huge part of this process. We do want local lords, because they provide an excellent springboard for the return of the kings across this globe. Why each method has its pros and cons, option number three is the most likely to succeed in today's political climate. This is not to say that the warrior king is undesirable, as this form of monarchy is both beautiful and practical! Nor would it be a bad idea to try and win elections, but winning elections is much harder when the validity of elections cannot be trusted. Additionally, as the rot at the core of society is much more widespread than most people would like to admit, most people will have to undergo dramatic, painful tyranny before they see the error of their ways. To simply begin the process of developing small, local lords is the most effective and practical method to achieve the dream of monarchy.Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

There has never been any proof of Macro Evolution, despite this, scientists and colleges teach the theory as absolute fact. Today it is nearly impossible to find any mainstream source that talks about science from a scientific point of view regarding evolution. Instead, research and teaching facilities begin with an assumed bias regarding the origin of species and never stop to consider whether or not their starting point is in the wrong place. This has led to many dangerous ideas and has seriously stunted scientific progress. Micro Evolution we can see every day in simple things like dog breeds looking very different from one another, or from any plant or animal that adapts to its environment to better survive. All organisms have a built in spectrum of potential adaptability, but that spectrum has absolute limits. Never in any research by any scientist has there been found any evidence that one species has mutated into another species. Despite the obvious need for proof, the unproven theory that is Macro Evolution has not a single shred of scientific evidence to back it up. Naturally, if all the known species today evolved from lesser organisms, as the theory propagates, there ought to be literal mountains of evidence corroborating the notion; but there is not a single transitioning life form found in any fossil records, historical texts, or even common human experience or traditions. Despite this gaping hole in the place of real, concrete evidence, it is, today, impossible to find a credible institution that teaches Macro Evolution as an unverified theory, instead, all the major institutions today teach Macro Evolution as a fact. There are two possible explanations for this bizarre phenomenon of faith before fact in the modern scientific community. The first is that scientists and teachers are no longer using their minds to reason and just accept in blind faith that which their forebears taught them, and their forebears in turn abandoned reason to do the same. The second possible explanation is that these institutions know full well that they are lying to us but refuse to deviate from the notion of Macro Evolution because they need something to replace God and this is the best solution they could find. Both possibilities are likely, but neither one is good for us. We need our scientists to take their science seriously, and not to rely on insane, unproven theories. Instead, we need our institutions to actually test their own theories and be willing to follow the science--instead of scientists. Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

The general opinion of historians is that the spirit of Christmas was a huge part of early Christian Tradition. It was only in the modern period that celebration of Father Christmas was disallowed, generally due to the "rowdiness" of the Christmas revelers, as early Puritans disapproved of outward displays of enthusiasm. One of the earliest mentions of such a person as Father Christmas comes to us in the form of Sir Christmas, to whom was dedicated a Christmas carol that we know was written before 1510AD. As a result, it become both beautiful and informative to discover whether or not such a person as a "Santa Clause" could ever possibly exist. The nature of the Christian God gives us a picture into the nature of such spiritual beings as Father Christmas. God the Father is, as we are told, a being composed of love. Love cannot exist without bearing fruit, and without someone to love. Therefore it was necessary for a being composed of love to beget a Son. Whence the Father and the Son exist there must be love between them, and love of God for God is the very Spirit of God, whom we call the Holy Spirit. This spirit was so real because the love was so real betwixt God that the spirit of the love became a living being unique. In this same manner, the being of Father Christmas has come into realness, as the love of Christians for each other, for God incarnate, and for the very spirit of Christmas itself, is the means by which Father Christmas has come into being. There is a reason why Santa Claus is so beloved the world over, and it's not because of paganism. In fact, the very enemies of Santa Claus are not orthodox Christian faiths, but only the puritan element within the Judaeo-Christian world. Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

Monarchies have a greater Standard of Living than ANY other form of government in the world. Though the common belief around the world today is that Monarchies are outdated and repressive to their people, the data reveals that monarchies seriously outclass their counterparts in measurable standards of living for the average person. Today's episode shows how five metrics can be used to measure each geographical area to determine the economic prospects for the people living there. Using these metrics, it becomes clear very quickly that Monarchies outperform all other forms of government in terms of real life corruption protection and yearly salary.  The five areas measured are: Average Per Capita Income per individual country and region. The Corruption Perception Index of each country and region. The percentage of GDP each country and region allocates to defense. The Percentage of GDP that the government of each country and region spends. The overall Credit Rating (Standard & Poors) of each country and region.  Monarchies significantly outperform in all five areas in nearly every geographical region of the world, which means that the average person will have a better real standard of living in a Monarchy than in any other form of government. It does not matter if you live in Africa or Oceania, the average person who is lucky enough to live in a Monarchy will have a better economic future than his neighbor.Referenceshttps://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_government_spending_as_percentage_of_GDPhttps://www.wikirating.comhttps://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/ratinghttps://www.countryaah.comhttps://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2021https://www.statista.com/statistics/1293562/expenditure-on-military-defense-as-gdp-share-in-the-european-union-eu-27/Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

Ever wonder why good stories we read as children stick with us long into adulthood, though it may have been decades since we read them? A good story is always very mythological, and because of this it speaks to us on a deep, archetypal level. We sometimes forget just how difficult and dangerous the world is, and books help us to try and take the Hero's Journey. Enter into the realm of myth with the Narnia series! Nothing is more important for character building than reading the Narnia books to young children. The Narnia books were an intentional attempt by C.S. Lewis to actively engage the young mind in the important mythologies by which we see and understand the world. The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe takes four children who could be any one of us and through a simple game of hide-and-seek ushers them into a fairytale world of mythology and high fantasy. Edmund is nearly turned to stone for his betrayal of his family for personal gain, just like a heart may be turned to stone by choosing self-love over others. Christmas is revealed in its full power, and kingship is everywhere. Courage and bravery in both a masculine and feminine form are taught through each character's own Hero's Journey, and proper fatherhood and motherhood are revealed in the characters of Mr. and Mrs. Beaver. A Journey to Narnia must not be missed for our children.For the adult we must endure a Tale of Two Cities. Charles Dickens has two works which surpass all his others, and these are a Tale of Two Cities and A Christmas Carol. The latter is wonderful and kid-friendly, the other is definitely not. Through eyes of the heroes who dare to rescue a princess in flaming, hellish France, we see the true nature of the Democratic Man. For modern man this work is just as important in scope and intent as George Orwell's 1984 and Animal Farm, as well as Aldous Huxley's A Brave New World. Nowhere is the stark reality of what the Left actually is more apparent than in Dicken's A tale of Two Cities. Unfortunately, human beings can descend to a level that amaze even devils, and in France in 1789 the leftist ideal of truly dark mythology was revealed. These works cannot be missed, and for the adult, a great couple of The Lion The Witch and The Wardrobe movies are just waiting to be seen! (But seriously, read the books)Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

Absolute Monarchy is an absolute mess. Traditional Monarchy is completely different from Absolute Monarchy. One is stable, beautiful, organic, and long lasting; and the other is unstable, wracked by divisions, unnatural, imbalanced, and destined for revolution. Absolute Monarchies are the direct result of failure to follow the Three Kingly Laws, and in every instance where even one of the Laws is broken in a country, we see that country careen into chaos. Like a tripod, all three laws are necessary for stability. In order to understand where the modern absolute monarchs came from, we need to look to history. The path to Absolutism in France began long before any kings named Louis, it began long before with the father of the Franks: Charlemagne. That great person did and accomplished many things, but his work was undone because of his failure to follow the third Kingly Law. Because he did not directly pass on his kingdom to his son, all of Charlemagne's empire crumbled. This, along with a generous sprinkling of Viking invasion, led to a series of events that ultimately crushed the Christian nation and turned it into the capital of Atheism that we see today. Absolutism could have so easily been avoided in France, but they failed. We, on the other hand, are not bound by their failures. We can see how the kings of France gobbled up the local lord's land and powers, and how that voracious appetite led to the ruin of the entire kingdom. We can see what they did, and so we can learn from their mistakes. We can set up Traditional Monarchies today because we have a doctrine of power that is informed by the past and looks to the future.This episode is part of the on going "Pros and Cons of Monarchy" series and answers the objection that there is too much potential of Absolutism in Monarchy. Advantages of Monarchy1. Reduces partisanship and creates a sense of unity 2. Faster Decision-making Process 3. Increases Government Savings4. Smooth Transition of Power5. Trained Leaders6. A Stable and Balanced Government7. Government is a Local Matter8. Monarchies Usually Revered by the People under Their Power9. Nonpartisan Leadership10. Leadership Focus11. Advocates for Strong Defense 12. Reduced corruption 13. Transparent chain of command: 14. Act on the interest of everyone15. The blame is Not Shared16. A single form of contact for foreign governments17. Family is the model for society18. Traditional Monarchies Typically Last for Hundreds of Years Objections to Monarchy:1. Lack of Democratic Accountability2. Lack of Democratic Legitimacy3. Excessive Power Invested in a Single Person4. More Difficult to Change the Leadership Internally5. May Lead to Tyranny6. Lack of Diversity in the Government 7. Changes according to the ruler8. Unparalleled Power of the Monarch 9. No Checks or Balances10. Competency of Leadership is not Guaranteed 11. Promotes Wealth Inequality12. Lack of Upward Mobility13. The Ruler may not be a Serious Person14.   Absolute Power has too much Potential for Tyranny15. Creates a Class System within Society 16. Potential for absolutism 17. Government is Too Human 18. Machiavelli Says that Monarchies are Easy to Conquer (But Hard to Hold)Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

The only forms of government that have ever lasted for over a thousand years are all monarchies. Additionally, the best way to have a unified nation without divisive and destructive factions is through monarchy, since there is no need for parties to play against each other in a bid for power. This makes for much more stable countries that can and do last for hundreds of years. With family as the nucleus of society, tradition flourishes and morality grows abundant. Monarchies provide a safe haven for traditional family values that provide stability and happiness for their people that is unrivaled in the modern mess that is democratic fervor. This episode contains an exploration of the final three Pros for Monarchy in our series: 16. A single form of contact for foreign governments 17. Family as the model for society 18. Traditional monarchies typically last for hundreds of years Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

Class divide is uncomfortable. Nobody wants to think about themselves as worse than someone else. The whole idea of a republic as devised by the Founding Fathers was to eliminate class divide into those with merits that thus deserve power, and those that choose not to achieve greatness. The system was designed at first to reward the best, but then settled into an ideal where anyone, regardless of natural ability or inclination could succeed. Then the ideal crystallized into a desire for utter equality, otherwise known as equality of outcome, where everyone would succeed equally, regardless of any other factor. However, the dream of a classless society was never realized, not even in Communistic countries.   The idea of class is simply a misunderstanding of natural hierarchical order. Hierarchies are human, and are the only bulwark against class. Only in a monarchy is ambition replaced with contentment, and only contentment leads to happiness. Since happiness is the best goal, let's try to gain this great prize over that of wealth and power.  Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

 Is the Shroud of Turin a clever fabrication by a Medieval charlatan? Where did the shroud come from? how was it made? Why does anybody still talk about it when the Carbon-14 dating test proved it to by a fraud? The Shroud of Turin, as it is now known, is supposedly the actual burial shroud that Jesus Christ was wrapped in after His death and crucifixion. It first came into the western consciousness in the 14th century, and since then much ado has been made of it, and rightly so, since, if it were real it would dramatically smash the dreams of many modern men who would like to believe that the man Jesus of Nazareth never lived. Whole teams of scientists have dedicated their lives and their entire careers around the study of this ancient Christian artifact, but nearly all the mainstream media sources rely on bad and disproven studies in their reporting on the shroud. In an attempt to clear the air regarding this extremely important and relevant artifact, let's explore the three major objections to the shroud's authenticity: The Carbon-14 dating test, the iron oxide test by Dr. Walter McCrone, and Joe Nickell's highly publicized "Popular Photography" recreation. While all of these objections were highly publicized, none of them were complete studies. The much quoted Carbon-14 dating test turned out to be contaminated with cloth from the 16th century. Dr. McCrone's iron oxide test was proven to be unscientific and finally false after he was ultimately forced to allow his work to be peer reviewed. The magician Joe Nickell produced a copy that in reality had none of the exact, biological details found in the shroud, and was, ultimately, a poor facsimile. None of the mainstream media outlets ever seem to mention the enormous amount of work that other scientists have done in analyzing the shroud for its authenticity, such as the incredible work by Dr. Liberato De Caro, from Italy’s Institute of Crystallography of the National Research Council in Bari. His pioneering work with the WAXS model has revealed with a huge degree of precision and detail the actual age of the linen. Neither does mainstream media mention the work by the STURG team that spent millions of dollars analyzing the shroud and came up with some fairly startling results. Ultimately, the Shroud of Turin is far more important historically, and especially to all Christians, than most people will admit. The shroud deserves to be considered much more carefully than such anti-Christian outlets as Wikipedia will allow. Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

Power cannot be manufactured, it can only be stolen. Galadriel tells us: " It began with the forging of the Great Rings. Three were given to the Elves, immortal, wisest and fairest of all beings. Seven to the Dwarf lords, great miners and craftsmen of the mountain halls. And nine, nine rings were gifted to the race of men, who, above all else, desire power." Tolkien understood men very well when he penned that passage in the Fellowship of the Ring. There is a limited amount of power to go around, however, and that means that additional power can only be taken from someone else who already possesses it.To fully understand the nature of The Tyrannical Man, we must understand the nature of power. Power is best understood as a web that connects all men to all things, and the exercise of power cannot take place without a living being to use that power upon. No powers can be added to the list of existing powers because power is natural and ordered, just as nature is ordered and limited. The fullest exercise of power on another creature or piece of nature does not create new powers, or even suck the power out of something else, it merely channels the existing power into the being upon which power is being exercised. Power is not an evil, power over one's own movements is not wrong, but as natural as nature. Powers are natural both to man individual, and officers among men, and different powers naturally reside within these archetypal spheres, the problem comes when some group or individual attempts to collect some of the powers that do not belong in his sphere of influence. The accumulation of power is the definition of tyranny. Any person, or group of persons, that takes some of the rightful powers of another person or group of persons has engaged in tyranny. The end result of tyranny is illness within society. Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

From Genghis Khan to Vlad the Impaler, scary kings pop out at us from the pages of history and fill us with dread. From the annals of history we learn about many of the mighty men who ruled with iron fists and tyrannized over their people, and when we think crowns, we often think killers. Unfortunately, history is replete with the savage as well as the sluggish, and as we posterity sit in judgement, we cannot forget that politicians, though far fewer in number in historical context, have been more brutal and less adroit than even the worst monarchs in thousands of years.For context, compare some of the ten worst monarchs who ever lived against their democratic counterparts and when the blood and dust settles, it becomes apparent that in less time the anti-king revolutionists killed more people than all the horrific, crowned tyrants in history. This in no way justifies the monarchs who committed these heinous acts, but it puts their deeds into proper context. Genghis killed his 40 millions, but so did Mao Zedong.It is not appropriate to blame the institution of Monarchy for the tyrannical actions of some of its members, since if we do, then we must also blame elections for the hundreds of millions of deaths that have been voted into office in the persons of such notables as Adolf Hitler and Charles Taylor of Liberia.Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

 On average living in a monarchy is going to get you an extra $1,500 in your pocket per year. This is because Monarchies are superior in the fields of reducing corruption and protecting property rights. The protection of property rights is key to liberty and reducing tyranny, and monarchies consistently perform better than Democracies and Republics (and, of course, Dictatorships!), which make Monarchies more resilient to change and to upheavals around the world. Additionally, countries with a monarchy have a higher than average overall GDP, with sixty percent of the top ten richest countries in the world per capita being Monarchies. Kings and Queens also help their countries to have a higher credit score, which helps businesses to thrive. Overall, Monarchies are far better suited to protect the little guy and improve the overall standard of living for their own people than any other form of government ever attempted. So... If you want more money, choose monarchy! This episode examines and refutes 2 cons typically associated with monarchy: 1. Monarchy promotes wealth inequality 2. Monarchies reduce upward mobility Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

Want a safer country with less corruption? Pick a Monarchy. The stats line up with the kings and queens, all over the world countries with monarchies are safer and better places to live than their neighbors with lesser forms of government. In today's episode we will target Africa and Europe with a statistical analysis, we measure commitment to the military, chain of command, and that extremely important measurement of success: the Corruption Perception Index. In this episode you will get to see how the monarchies compare to their neighbors, as well as find out what the least corrupt country in the world is (hint: it's a monarchy!).Continuing this intriguing Pros and Cons series with five more Pros to Monarchy, we will go over these benefits to the most ancient and practical government ever tried:11. Monarchies Advocate for a strong defense12. Monarchies reduce corruption13. Monarchies have a transparent chain of command14. Monarchies act in the interest of everyone, not just special interest groups15. In a Monarchy the blame is not sharedSupport the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

No leader should be half a man, instead, we demand a fully human being as our king. In this continuation of the pros and cons series we explore five more pros to monarchy. We learn from Thomas Hobbes penultimate work "Leviathan" that mixt government in the meerly Civill form that there be more than one Soule; and this abomination of the body destroys the ability of man to simultaneously access his executive, judicial, and legislative faculties. Instead, a fully functional monarch has the elevating ability to bring all three governmental functions into harmony and have a single, unifying purpose. Representative governments have a very real issue with separation of powers, in that the separation is required to alleviate tyranny, but ultimately leads to a disconnect between the branches. People should not separate out chunks of their mind and then only use that piece, people should use their whole minds in making decisions. Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

A much more sensible solution, monarchy costs less and has better transitions than representative governments. Modern monarchs especially are better trained than their elected counterparts and a line of succession is always clear. Without the massive glut of election costs, a traditional polity will not need to charge as much in taxes and run a cleaner, smoother government. Countries with monarchies are much more unified, there is way less party partizan politics, and people in monarchies tend to love their monarchs. Monarchs typically have much higher approval ratings than their elected counterparts, and since there are no elections, there are no disenfranchised voters. Additionally, monarchs move a lot faster in getting things done than representative governments which typically take many years to accomplish even the most basic things. Today's episode focuses on five positives regarding monarchy, and is a follow up to the five negatives associated with monarchy. This episodal series attempts to answer the great questions that have been raised against monarchy, and to see when all the smoke clears whether or not monarchy is worth having at all, let alone the best form of government.Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

Time to play Devil's Advocate! Everyone wants to know what the opposition to monarchy is saying, people want to know what the best arguments for and against monarchy are, and it is time to share them. This episode begins by exploring five of the best arguments AGAINST monarchy, and the possible answers to these serious objections. Considering that it is necessary to give the devil his due and answer the questions true, each of the objections is treated as seriously as possible. Great minds have come before and have looked carefully into the question of state, and since we live in an age when monarchy is all but ended, we need to decide whether or not the side that won in the modern age deserves to be the dominant theory still, or whether the ancients were right after all.Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

 With the passing of the Queen of England, the future of the British monarchy is in question. The US has long held a unique, special relationship with the UK, so for this episode it only made sense to sit down with a Scotsman from the Isle of Lewis and discuss the parliament. Meet Lewis Macaulay, a pastor who works with in a Scottish Scheme to save the souls the government forgot. Lewis helps us to understand the current situation in 2022 Scotland, how a once traditional country lost its roots and fell away into modern brutalism, and then post-modern nihilism. The new parliament of 1707 is nothing at all like the parliament that preceded it, that new creation of the 1300's, and neither is like the traditional model of small, local government of the ideal, traditional approach. On this episode we discuss the inner workings of the United Kingdom's political approach, the good, the bad, and how things might be different under the new king. Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

Is beauty truly in the eye of the beholder? Or is there some higher standard which is greater than man and his fluctuating opinions. Art is the outpouring of the heart, and that means that a look at a person's, or a society's, art will reveal what the artist considers to be valuable. Art is the true canary in the coal mine to give us a hint as to what our society believes, and because the art being mass produced today is terrifically horrible and pathetically sad, that tells us a lot about where we truly stand. Art is also always cutting edge, so art is where we should be looking to see where society is, but more importantly, to see where society is going.Beauty is intrinsically tied to ethics and ideals, and in the elevation of our art we have an opportunity to create a better world. Dostoevsky, the king of all the Russian writers, said that beauty will save the world, and this is because only those with beautiful ideals can create beautiful things, and a love of beautiful things is a love for beautiful ideals, therefore, let us love that which is beautiful so that we can save the world.Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

How do you try to outline a theory of everything? Guest host Joshua Roberts has returned to the Traditional Press to try and help us do just that. Traditionism is a holistic, complete theory of life that affects every aspect of the human experience, and as a result, is both fully religious and political, it marries government and the church, just as faith is married to practice. Christendom, in the fullness of the word, is the practical and idealistic goal of the traditional party, however, a traditional monarchy in every religious background would still be better for every country. This means that a Muslim monarchy would be better for Muslims than a Muslim Republic, and the same is true for Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, etc. The goal of the Traditional Press is to begin the process of creating a fully functional political party, whose goal is to guide us out of the Tyrannical phase into the Empire phase.Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com

What would real life look like if we could actually get a monarchy? If we lived in a traditional monarchy today, how would some real life scenarios play out differently than they do in our current government? Renting, landlords, taxation, innovation, and the beauty and total functionality of local manufacturing communities instead of mass manufacture which is so dehumanizing and miserable, in every meaningful respect a traditional government is more humane and easier to navigate than the modern one.Guest host Matthew Roberts comes onto the show today to ask some real world questions to help clarify the unique perspective of the traditional approach to life and governorship.Support the showCheck out my YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHPUeZsoGsMm7El1Xr8UGnAAnd my Twitter:https://twitter.com/traditionalpresAnd my Website!https://www.traditionalpress.com