Dr. Chapa’s OBGYN Clinical Pearls

Neither the ACOG nor SMFM recommend strict bed rest for preterm birth prevention, or nor preeclampsia. Yet tradition often conflicts with evidence. A prior 2009 survey of MFM specialists, published in the AJOG, on the use of bed rest revealed that 71% used activity restriction in their practice for arrested preterm labor, despite the majority believing it had minimal or no benefit. The authors concluded, “Because most obstetricians in our survey indicated they would prescribe bed rest believing it was associated with minimal or no benefit, it is possible that even if a randomized, prospective trial showed no benefit associated with bed rest, it would still remain a common recommendation.” This brings us to a brand new publication from the Green Journal which is an ancillary study of two randomized trials of preterm birth prevention in women with a short cervical length. These authors sought to evaluate the amount of physical activity in patients at high risk for preterm birth and pregnancy latency and preterm birth. What did they find? It is a bit shocking. Listen in for details.1. Fox, Nathan S. et al. The recommendation for bed rest in the setting of arrested preterm labor and premature rupture of membranes. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Volume 200, Issue 2, 165.e1 - 165.e6 https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(08)00909-5/fulltext2. Sciscione, Anthony C. DO; Booker, Whitney A. for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network, Bethesda, Maryland. Activity Restriction in Pregnancy and the Risk of Early Delivery: The AWARE Study. Obstetrics & Gynecology ():10.1097/AOG.0000000000006225, February 19, 2026. | DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006225 https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=9900&issue=00000&article=01460&type=FulltextVisit our SPONSOR’s Webpage for information on the Hemorrhage View C-Section Drape: www.perspectivemedical.org

A study published in Nature Communications, published Feb 19, 2026, found that “pregnancy physically alters a woman’s brain, with a second pregnancy bringing even more profound effects.” The researchers “performed brain scans on 110 women. Some were first-time mothers, others second-time moms, and some nulliparous women. Results showed that during a first pregnancy, the greatest changes occur in the structure and activity of the ‘default mode network’ – the brain system responsible for self-reflection and mind wandering. Are these changes bad? Are they associated with long term hard? Are they adaptive? It’s a complex question, with real answers. Listen in for details.1. Straathof, M., Halmans, S., Pouwels, P.J.W. et al. The effects of a second pregnancy on women’s brain structure and function. Nat Commun 17, 1495 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69370-82. de Lange AG, Kaufmann T, van der Meer D, et al. Population-Based Neuroimaging Reveals Traces of Childbirth in the Maternal Brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019.3. Aleknaviciute J, Evans TE, Aribas E, et al.)Long-Term Association of Pregnancy and Maternal Brain Structure: The Rotterdam Study. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2022.4. Jung JH, Lee GW, Lee JH, et al. Multiparity, Brain Atrophy, and Cognitive Decline. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2020.5. Hu A, Xiong L, Wei H, et al. Association of Menarche, Menopause, and Reproductive History With Cognitive Performance in Older US Women: A Cross-Sectional Study From NHANES 2011-2014. BMC Public Health. 2025.6. Orchard ER, Ward PGD, Sforazzini F, et al. Relationship Between Parenthood and Cortical Thickness in Late Adulthood. PloS One. 20207. Hoekzema E, Barba-Müller E, Pozzobon C, et al. Pregnancy Leads to Long-Lasting Changes in Human Brain Structure. Nature Neuroscience. 2017.8. de Lange AG, Barth C, Kaufmann T, et al. Women's Brain Aging: Effects of Sex-Hormone Exposure, Pregnancies, and Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease. Human Brain Mapping. 2020.Visit our SPONSOR's LINK to learn more about the Hemorrhage view CS Drape: https://www.perspectivemedical.org/

Approximately 5–10% of all breast cancers are hereditary, and among those, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are responsible for about 60% of cases. Yet, overall, only about 1-2% of all breast cancers in the general population are caused by BRCA mutations. Once childbearing is complete, the NCCN recommends risk-reducing BSO in patients carrying these mutations. But what about the uterus? Since childbearing is complete, and the ovaries are now removed, the sole purpose of the uterus- which is to initiate, nourish, and grow a child -is no longer applicable. Is there a call for inclusion of a hysterectomy at time of risk reducing BSO? This has vast and important implications regarding subsequent hormone therapy. In this episode, which comes from one of our podcast family members, we will dive into the latest data pushing towards the inclusion of hysterectomy at time of prophylactic BSO. It's fascinating data from just last year (2025, in the Journal of the NCI). Listen in for details.1. Kotsopoulos J, Seca M, Gronwald J, et al. Menopausal Hormone Therapy and the Risk of Breast Cancer in Women With a Pathogenic Variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2025. 2. Kotsopoulos J, Gronwald J, Karlan BY, et al. Hormone Replacement Therapy After Oophorectomy and Breast Cancer Risk Among BRCA1 Mutation Carriers. JAMA Oncology. 2018

The ACOG states that, “Iron deficiency anemia during pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk of low birth weight, preterm delivery, and perinatal mortality and should be treated with iron supplementation in addition to prenatal vitamins. In addition, there may be an association between maternal iron deficiency anemia and postpartum depression, with poor results in mental and psychomotor performance testing in offspring”. Screening for anemia is included in most prenatal lab sets. However, up to 42% of women who enter prenatal care are iron deficient BEFORE anemia is detected. Iron deficiency itself, even without anemia, has also been linked to pregnancy morbidity. The ACOG currently does not have a statement endorsing universal ferritin screening in pregnancy outside of established anemia, but new data is challenging this (Jan 2026, Lancet). Listen in for details. 1. ACOG PB 2332. Wasim T, Bushra N, Nasrin T, Humayun S, Tajammul A, Khawaja KI, Irshad S, Fatima S, Yasin A, Zamora J, Cano-Ibáñez N, Fernandez-Felix BM, Khan KS; Ferritin screening and iron treatment for maternal anaemia and fetal growth restriction prevention (FAIR) Study Group. Intravenous iron for non-anaemic iron deficiency in pregnancy: a multicentre, two-arm, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. 2026 Jan;13(1):e22-e29. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00315-1. PMID: 41482443.3. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2024.15196

We recently covered an SMFM abstract that was presented at the annual Pregnancy Meeting held in early February 2026. The authors were from my Alma Mater, UT Southwestern/Parkland Hospital. This was a well-done study comparing 162 milligrams aspirin to 81 milligrams of aspirin. The results were very encouraging! However, aspirin definitely has an awkward acumen. It would be wonderful if ALL the data just leaned in the same direction... but it doesn’t! Enter our podcast family member, and my friend Alex. Alex sent me an incredible and insightful message which was a rebuttal to my Southwestern colleagues’ findings. In this episode you'll hear Alex's rebuttal and clinical conundrum, and we will explain why these two seemingly paradoxical findings makes sense. Listen in for details.1. Khander, Amrin MD; Thomas, Charlene MS; Matthews, Kathy MD; Christos, Paul DrPH; Alcus, Claire BA; Alam, Tanvir BS; Bush, Leah BA; Deshmukh, Diksha BA; Chasen, Stephen T. MD; Riley, Laura E. MD; Skupski, Daniel W. MD; August, Phyllis MD, MPH; Malha, Line MD, MS. Comparison of 162 mg and 81 mg Aspirin for Prevention of Preeclampsia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology 147(1):p 87-96, January 2026. | DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006100

Well, even though low dose aspirin has been recommended for the reduction of preeclampsia risk for many years, 2 controversies persist: 1. who should get it, and 2. the dose we should use. While the current US recommendation still focuses on 81 mg low dose aspirin, initiated after 12 weeks of gestation (based on risk factors), there's increased movement and growing data supporting both universal adoption and the higher dose of 162 mg. In this episode, we will briefly summarize brand new data out of UT Southwestern which was just published at the SMFM Annual Pregnancy meeting in Las Vegas. Listen in for details.1. https://www.smfm.org/news/new-studyroutine-aspirin-therapypreventsseverepreeclampsiainat-risk-populations2. ACOG CO 7433. The Effect of Aspirin on the Risk of Preeclampsia Based on the Fetal Medicine Foundation First Trimester Risk.4. Bujold E, Rolnik DL, Poon L, Syngelaki A, Wright D, Nicolaides KH. The effect of aspirin on the risk of preeclampsia based on the Fetal Medicine Foundation first-trimester risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Oct 31:S0002-9378(25)00808-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.10.032. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 41177290.

As BMIs and weights increase across the US population, there have been increased calls for universal screening for existing DM at entrance to prenatal care, if under 20 weeks. Others, including the ACOG, prefer to screen early those with additional risk factors (like prior GDM HX, prior macrosomia, BMI >30, PCOS, first degree relative with diabetes, or age >40). In July 2024, the ACOG released its publication, “Screening for Gestational and Pregestational Diabetes in Pregnancy and Postpartum”. In this guidance, it states, “At this time, there are insufficient data to support the best screening modality for pregestational diabetes in pregnancy, but consideration can be made to use the same diagnostic criteria as for the nonpregnant population (A1c value 6.5 or higher, or fasting plasma glucose value 126 mg/dL or higher, or 2-hour plasma glucose value 200 mg/dL or higher during a 75-g OGTT, or random plasma glucose value 200 mg/dL or higher in patients with classic hyperglycemia symptoms)”. However, a new proposed protocol has been published in AJOG for early screening for DM in pregnancy. This also describes the differences in diagnosis and care for Standard GDM diagnosed at 24-28 weeks, vs a diagnosis of pregestational DM diagnosis made prior to 20-weeks vs “early” GDM also diagnosed under 20 weeks of gestation. Listen in for details. 1. McLaren, Rodney et al.nA Proposed Classification of Diabetes Mellitus in PregnancyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Volume 0, Issue 0. Epub Feb 2, 2026; https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(26)00061-X/fulltext2. ACOG Clinical Practice Update: Screening for Gestational and Pregestational Diabetes in Pregnancy and Postpartum; July 2024; https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/abstract/2024/07000/acog_clinical_practice_update__screening_for.34.aspx3. Simmons, David et al. “Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed Early in Pregnancy.” The New England journal of medicine vol. 388,23 (2023): 2132-2144. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2214956

There has been a shift in cervical cancer screening from primary cytology based to HPV based. Even HPV screening has had its evolution from physician collected samples to patient self-collection, either in a clinical setting or at home with an approved collection system. In May 2025, the FDA cleared the first at-home self-collection kit for HPV screening, specifically the Teal Wand by Teal Health. Now, we are seeing the advent of POSSIBLY another avenue for cervical HPV testing- although it is a bit awkward: the use of menstrual blood as an HPV screening test. In this episode we will review a new cross-sectional, population-based study from China which compared testing menstrual blood for human papillomavirus during cervical cancer screening to clinician-collected cervical samples for human papillomavirus (HPV). This concept, and these results, are not new at all! And there are important limitations to consider at this time. Listen in for details.1. Testing menstrual blood for human papillomavirus during cervical cancer screening in China: cross sectional population based study. BMJ 2026; 392 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2025-084831 (Published 04 February 2026)BMJ 2026;392:e084831https://www.bmj.com/content/392/bmj-2025-0848312. Naseri S, Young S, Cruz G, Blumenthal PD. Screening for High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Using Passive, Self-Collected Menstrual Blood. Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep 1;140(3):470-476. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004904. Epub 2022 Aug 3. PMID: 35926207; PMCID: PMC9377370.3. Fokom Domgue J, Chandra M, Oladoyin O, Desai M, Yu R, Shete S. Women’s Preferences for Home-Based Self-Sampling or Clinic-Based Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening. JAMA Netw Open. 2026;9(2):e2558841. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.58841

Well podcast family, we are back with another installment of our “You ask, We answer” edition. We've got 2 fascinating and real-world clinical conundrums in this episode, both suggested by two separate podcast family members. The first has to do with RH IG maternal administration. Here's the question: If a patient receives routine, prophylactic RH IG at 28 weeks but then has maternal trauma say 1 or 2 weeks after, does she still require an additional dose of RH IG? That's a good question because it's not as intuitive as you would think. We will explain in this episode and there is a bit of a contradiction in the guidance. The second question has to do with finding an asymptomatic uterine rupture at cesarean section. Is there such a thing as a “partial” (silent) uterine rupture? There's recent data from 2025 about this. Listen in for details.1. ACOG PB 181; 2017. 2. Baek S, Froese V, Morgenstern B. Risk Profiles and Outcomes of Uterine Rupture: A Retrospective and Comparative Single-Center Study of Complete and Partial Ruptures. J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 15;14(14):4987. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144987. PMID: 40725680; PMCID: PMC12295210.3. Vandenberghe G, Bloemenkamp K, Berlage S, Colmorn L, Deneux-Tharaux C, Gissler M, Knight M, Langhoff-Roos J, Lindqvist PG, Oberaigner W, Van Roosmalen J, Zwart J, Roelens K; INOSS (the International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems). The International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems study of uterine rupture: a descriptive multi-country population-based study. BJOG. 2019 Feb;126(3):370-381. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15271. Epub 2018 Jun 12. PMID: 29727918.

Fetal Microcephaly has an incidence of 2 to 12 in10,000 births in the USA and can be diagnosed prenatally via ultrasound (in second or early third trimester) or postnatally via measurement of head circumference (HC).  Antepartum, this is a unique diagnosis since we are mainly used to using PERCENTAGES for biometrics and for fetal weight, butmicrocephaly is not diagnosed by HC percentage- but by Standard Deviation (SD). Microcephaly has been linked to developmental delay, seizures, as well as feeding, vision and hearing problems.  Prognosis depends on the severityof the microcephaly and whether it is associated with other anomalies. What SD is diagnostic of microcephaly? What are the potential etiologies? What genetic syndromes are most associated with true microcephaly? Is fetal cranial MRIrecommended? Listen in for details. 1.     Sukenik-Halevy R, Golbary Kinory E, Laron KenetT, Brabbing-Goldstein D, Gilboa Y, Basel-Salmon L, Perlman S. Prenatalgender-customized head circumference nomograms result in reclassification ofmicrocephaly and macrocephaly. AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Jan 29;3(1):100171. doi:10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100171. PMID: 36864987; PMCID: PMC9972400.2.     SOGC CO (2019) No. 380-Investigation andManagement of Prenatally Identified Microcephaly3.     Fetal Medicine Foundation: Microcephaly; https://fetalmedicine.org/education/fetal-abnormalities/brain/microcephaly

Stress fractures are common injuries in athletes and military recruits, that’s’ understandable- based on the physical forces placed on the long bones. A stress fracture can be defined as a partial or complete fracture of the bone that is a result from repeated application of stress lower than that required to fracture the bone in a single loading situation. In pregnancy, the body is subjected to various physiological changes that make women more vulnerable. In this pregnancy, we will highlight a REAL patient case which our team cared for on the inpatient service where a simple cough at 34 weeks leads to a painful spontaneous rib fracture! Is there any data published on this? Are serum tests for bone turn-over required as part of this workup? Listen in for clinical pearls!1. 1962: Long A.E.: “Stress fracture of the ribs associated with pregnancy”. Surg. Clin. North Am., 1962, 42, 909.2. 2000: Baitner AC, Bernstein AD, Jazrawi AJ, Della Valle CJ, Jazrawi LM. Spontaneous rib fracture during pregnancy. A case report and review of the literature. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2000;59(3):163-5. PMID: 11126720. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11126720/3. 2015: Rib stress fractures in pregnancy: a case report and review of literature. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/file:///C:/Users/hchapa/Downloads/1575956493464-5157163%20(1).pdf4. Zhang Y, Li R, Zhang J, Zhou W, Yu F. Changes in Serum Concentrations of Bone Turnover Markers in Healthy Pregnant Women. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2023.

We have learned a lot about extended spectrum coverage of prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean section. The landmark C/SOAP trial randomized 2,013 women undergoing nonelective cesarean delivery to azithromycin 500 mg IV plus standard prophylaxis versus placebo, demonstrating a 51% reduction in the composite outcome of endometritis, wound infection, or other infection. Adjuvant Zmax (plus standard first-generation cephalosporin) is now recognized as evidence-based antibiotic coverage for intrapartum cesarean, cesarean with ruptured membranes, and patients with obesity. This last patient characteristic comes from the ERAS latest update. But what is ZMAX is not available? Is there an evidence-based peri-op alternative in these cases? Does Gent and Clinda cover mycoplasma/Ureaplasma? What about postop flagyl? Listen in for details. 1. Tita AT, Szychowski JM, Boggess K, et al. Adjunctive Azithromycin Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2016. 2. Yang M, Yuan F, Guo Y, Wang S. Efficacy of Adding Azithromycin to Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Caesarean Delivery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2022. 2. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 199: Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Labor and Delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics 3. Martingano D, Nguyen A, Nkeih C, Singh S, Mitrofanova A. Clarithromycin Use for Adjunct Surgical Prophylaxis Before Non-Elective Cesarean Deliveries to Adapt to Azithromycin Shortages in COVID-19 Pandemic. PloS One. 2020. 4. Valent AM, DeArmond C, Houston JM, et al. Effect of Post–Cesarean Delivery Oral Cephalexin and Metronidazole on Surgical Site Infection Among Obese Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2017. 5. Wood, G. E., et al. "In Vitro Susceptibility of Mycoplasma genitalium to Nitroimidazoles." Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 6. https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/mycoplasmagenitalium.htm

We have covered the subject of whether to include the decidual (innermost) layer when closing the uterine incision during cesarean section (CS) on at least 2 episodes. The most recent was in September 2025, when we focused on a published (September 2025) systematic review and meta-analysis from the Green Journal. Back then, we compared those new findings to our prior episode from 2023 on the same matter. Well, we are back at it again with the same subject as there is a new EXPERT REVIEW from the AJOG on hysterotomy closure technique which just came out January 2026. What did these authors conclude? There are also some controversial suggestions made by the authors. Listen in for details. 1. Antoine C, Meyer JA, Silverstein J, Buldo-Licciardi J, Lyu C, Timor-Tritsch IE. Endometrium-Free Closure Technique During Cesarean Delivery for Reducing the Risk of Niche Formation and Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders. Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jun 1;145(6):674-682. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005813. Epub 2025 Jan 9. PMID: 39787602. 2. Gialdini, Celina et al.Evidence-based surgical procedures to optimize caesarean outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews. eClinicalMedicine- Lancet (June 2024), Volume 72, 102632 3. Dahlke, Joshua D. MD; Mendez-Figueroa, Hector MD; Maggio, Lindsay MD, MPH; Sperling, Jeffrey D. MD, MS; Chauhan, Suneet P. MD, Hon DSc; Rouse, Dwight J. MD. The Case for Standardizing Cesarean Delivery Technique: Seeing the Forest for the Trees. Obstetrics & Gynecology 136(5):p 972-980, November 2020. | DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004120 4. Antoine C, Timor-Tritsch IE, Bujold E, Young BK, Reece EA. Endometrium-free closure technique for hysterotomy incision at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2026 Jan;233(6S):S103-S114. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.07.009. PMID: 41485813.

As OB healthcare providers, we have several pieces of guidance regarding determination of amniotic fluid volume antepartum. The SMFM has Consult Series #46 (2018), which describes the management of polyhydramnios. We'll touch on that in this episode. However, while we have clear understanding of the increased risks of oligohydramnios, where an MVP is preferred for diagnosis over AFI, we have less information about polyhydramnios. But a new study published in BJOG (January 2026) provides more insights on this. While MVP is preferred for oligo diagnosis, can the same be said for polyhydramnios? Is there an increased risk in perinatal morbidity with polyhydramnios, and is that better detected by MVP or AFI? This new study findings left the authors unsatisfied although it CONFIRMED what we have covered in past episodes. Listen in for details.1. Dashe, Jodi S. et al. SMFM Consult Series #46: Evaluation and management of polyhydramnios. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Volume 219, Issue 4, B2 - B8 (2018)2. ACOG PB 229: Antepartum Fetal Surveillance (2021)3. Petrecca A, Chauhan SP, Tersigni C, Ghi T, Berghella V. Amniotic Fluid Index Versus Maximum Vertical Pocket Versus Both for Polyhydramnios. BJOG. 2026 Jan 7. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.70139. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 41502220.

Back in March of 2025, the green journal (obstetrics andgynecology) published A systematic review and meta-analysis on 2 medications (non-hormonal) and their efficacy in menopausal hot flash relief period these medications were Fezolinetant and Elinzanetant. However, the editors have just recently released an “Expression of Concern” about this review. Listen in for details. 1.     Menegaz de Almeida, Artur MS; Oliveira, PalomaMS; Lopes, Lucca MD; Leite, Marianna MS; Morbach, Victória MS; Alves Kelly,Francinny MD; Barros, Ítalo MS; Aquino de Moraes, Francisco Cezar MS;Prevedello, Alexandra MD. Fezolinetant and Elinzanetant Therapy for MenopausalWomen Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obstetrics & Gynecology 145(3):p 253-261, March 2025. | DOI:10.1097/AOG.00000000000058122.     Expression of Concern: Fezolinetant andElinzanetant Therapy for Menopausal Women Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms: ASystematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology():10.1097/AOG.0000000000006180, January 16, 2026. | DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006180

Implanon (etonogestrel implant) first received FDA approval in 2006, followed by the improved, radiopaque version, Nexplanon, approved by the FDA in 2010, which is now the only contraceptive implant available in the U.S. It was originally FDA approved for a 3-year use duration, although peer reviewed clinical data had demonstrated efficacy through year 5. Now, as of January 2026, the FDA has formally agreed to extend the label for 5-year use. In this episode, we will review the clinical data that prompted the FDA’s decision, based on a multicenter, single-arm, open-label study evaluating contraceptive efficacy and safety during years 4 and 5 of implant use.1. https://www.contemporaryobgyn.net/view/fda-approves-5-year-use-for-etonogestrel-implant-68-mg-contraceptive2. Organon announces US Food and Drug Administration approval of supplemental new drug application extending duration of use of NEXPLANON (etonogestrel implant) 68 mg Radiopaque. Organon. Press release. January 16, 2026. Accessed January 19, 2026. https://www.organon.com/news/organon-announces-us-food-and-drug-administration-approval-of-supplemental-new-drug-application-extending-duration-of-use-of-nexplanon-etonogestrel-implant-68-mg-radiopaque/3. Ali M, Akin A, Bahamondes L, et al. Extended Use Up to 5 Years of the Etonogestrel-Releasing Subdermal Contraceptive Implant: Comparison to Levonorgestrel-Releasing Subdermal Implant. Human Reproduction. 2016. 4. McNicholas C, Swor E, Wan L, Peipert JF. Prolonged Use of the Etonogestrel Implant and Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device: 2 Years Beyond Food and Drug Administration-Approved Duration. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017. 5. McNicholas C, Maddipati R, Zhao Q, Swor E, Peipert JF. Use of the Etonogestrel Implant and Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device Beyond the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Approved Duration. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015.

Ursodiol (ursodeoxycholic acid) is a prescription bile acid medication used to dissolve cholesterol gallstones, prevent gallstones during rapid weight loss, and treat liver diseases like primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) by reducing toxic bile acids and cholesterol production. It works by changing bile composition, making it less saturated with cholesterol, and is available as oral medication. Of course, it is also the foundational medication for treatment of diagnosed Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy (ICP). Does this medication reduce adverse perinatal outcomes? In this episode, we will review a new study from the Green Journal, which will be out in February 2026, examining the recurrence risk for ICP using data from NY. In a patient with prior history of ICP, is there any guidance on monitoring of serum bile acids in the subsequent pregnancy before symptoms develop? We will explain. PLUS we will review the data on whether Ursodiol may hold promise in recurrence prevention or in reduction of adverse outcomes once the condition is diagnosed. Listen in for details. 1. 2019: Chappell LC, Bell JL, Smith A, Linsell L, Juszczak E, Dixon PH, Chambers J, Hunter R, Dorling J, Williamson C, Thornton JG; PITCHES study group. Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (PITCHES): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Sep 7;394(10201):849-860. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31270-X. Epub 2019 Aug 1. PMID: 31378395; PMCID: PMC6739598. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31378395/2. February 08, 2025: Rahim, Mussarat N et al. Pregnancy and the liver. The Lancet. 2021; Volume 405, Issue 10477, 498 – 513 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)02351-1/fulltext3. SMFM CS 53; 20214. Rosenberg, Henri M. MD; Sarker, Minhazur R. MD; Ramos, Gladys A. MD; Bianco, Angela MD; Ferrara, Lauren MD; DeBolt, Chelsea A. MD. Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy Recurrence in a Subsequent Pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology 147(2):p 239-241, February 2026. | DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006033 https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/fulltext/2026/02000/intrahepatic_cholestasis_of_pregnancy_recurrence.13.aspx5. Ovadia C, Sajous J, Seed PT et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul;6(7):547-558. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00074-1. Epub 2021 Apr 27. PMID: 33915090; PMCID: PMC8192305.6. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of liver diseases in pregnancy. European Association for the Study of the Liver; 2023

HCG is a heterodimeric glycoprotein typically produced by trophoblastic tissue. However, there are occasions where a serum HCG is obtained that remains low level POSITIVE, yet the patient is not pregnant, nor does she have a gynecologic malignancy. Why dose this happen. Not all these instances can be explained by the “PHANTOM” HCG. In this episode, we will review a new Clinical Consensus guideline from the ACOG officially being released in Feb 2026. Like the finding of an aberrant aneuploidy on cell-free DNA testing in pregnancy (NIPT) where the child is found to NOT be affected, where that abnormal result may signal a hidden malignancy, a persistent low level positive HCG that cannot be explained by pregnancy or a gyn cancer may signal a hidden malignancy elsewhere. Listen in for details. 1. ACOG CC #11, February 2026

The ENG implant has data placing it as the most reversible, hormonal contraceptive agent available with a typical use failure rate of 0.05%. Unfavorable bleeding patterns, such as frequent or prolonged bleeding, affect approximately 40% of ENG implant users within the first 3 months but typically improve over time. Nonetheless, it is the main reason for patient discontinuation. In the past, various medications have shown to have at least some short-term reduction in bothersome breakthrough bleeding (BTB). These include doxycycline, ethinyl estradiol (EE), mefenamic acid, combined oral contraceptives (COCs), short term tamoxifen, norethindrone, and ulipristal acetate. In this episode, we will summarize a new RCT (AJOG, released as epub on Jan 7, 2026) which describes the use of TXA for ENG related BTB. Did it work? Listen in for details.1. Andrade, Maíra Cristina Ribeiro et al. Norethisterone for prolonged uterine bleeding associated with etonogestrel implant (IMPLANET): a randomized controlled trialAmerican Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Volume 234, Issue 1, 101 - 1152. Edelman, Alison et al. Treatment of unfavorable bleeding patterns in contraceptive implant users with tranexamic acid: randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Volume 0, Issue (Articles in Press January 07, 2026)

It’s a controversial topic: the impact of uterine incision (hysterectomy) on the neonate delivery interval (also called the U-D interval). Does it matter? Just to be clear, we’re talking about time from uterine entry to fetal extraction, not skin incision to fetal extraction. Past publications have produced conflicting results, often limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneous indications for delivery, and reliance on surrogate markers (like apgar scores) rather than clinical morbidity. But a new study published in the Gray journal at the end of 2025 (December 30, 2025) gives some new insights. In this episode, we will review this retrospective study and play the “Devil’s advocate” as we summarize the rebuttal data. As the reports are conflicting, we will end the podcast with a real-world interpretation and application of this data. Listen in for details. 1. Bart, Yossi et al. Uterine Incision-to-Delivery Interval and Neonatal Outcomes among Non-urgent, Term, Cesarean Deliveries. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Volume 0, Issue 0. https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(25)00980-9/fulltext?rss=yes2. Maayan-Metzger A, Schushan-Eisen I, Todris L, Etchin A, Kuint J. The effect of time intervals on neonatal outcome in elective cesarean delivery at term under regional anesthesia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Dec;111(3):224-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.07.022. Epub 2010 Sep 19. PMID: 20855070. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20855070/3. Spain JE, Tuuli M, Stout MJ, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Time from uterine incision to delivery and hypoxic neonatal outcomes. Am J Perinatol. 2015 Apr;32(5):497-502. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396696. Epub 2014 Dec 24. PMID: 25539409.4. Bader AM, Datta S, Arthur GR, Benvenuti E, Courtney M, Hauch M. Maternal and fetal catecholamines and uterine incision-to-delivery interval during elective cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Apr;75(4):600-3. PMID: 2107478.5. Tekin, E., Inal, H.A. & Isenlik, B.S. A Comparison of the Effect of Time from Uterine Incision to Delivery on Neonatal Outcomes in Women with One Previous and Repeat (Two or More) Cesarean Sections. SN Compr. Clin. Med. 5, 80 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-023-01427-x