Dr. Chapa’s OBGYN Clinical Pearls

Podcast family, welcome to Quickie #4. This one will be fun: A. Medicine changes, and changes fast. I trained with and learned the Grannum grading placental system (grades 0-III based on ultrasound appearance). Is that still a thing? We recently found a “grade III placenta at 34 weeks” as an incidental finding. Is there specific management considerations for this? Listen in for details. B. What do we do when a patient has “two GBS results” in one pregnancy hat are discordant. Listen in for that as well!1. Jaiman S, Romero R, Pacora P, et al. Disorders of Placental Villous Maturation Are Present in One-Third of Cases With Spontaneous Preterm Labor. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2021. 2. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 2017. Sentilhes L, Sénat MV, Ancel PY, et al. Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth: Guidelines for Clinical Practice From the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).3. Brink LT, Roberts DJ, Wright CA, et al. Placental Pathology in Spontaneous and Iatrogenic Preterm Birth: Different Entities With Unique Pathologic Features. Placenta. 2022. 4. Chitlange SM, Hazari KT, Joshi JV, Shah RK, Mehta AC. Ultrasonographically Observed Preterm Grade III Placenta and Perinatal Outcome.International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 1990. 5. Mirza FG, Ghulmiyyah LM, Tamim H, et al. To Ignore or Not to Ignore Placental Calcifications on Prenatal Ultrasound: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine : The Official Journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. 2018. 6. Quinlan RW, Cruz AC, Buhi WC, Martin M. Changes in Placental Ultrasonic Appearance. II. Pathologic Significance of Grade III Placental Changes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1982. 7. Karen M. Puopolo Group B Streptococcal Disease. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5581-8825; Published February 25, 2026 N Engl J Med 2026;394:896-905ACOG 797

Well, it's no doubt we live in a culture of immediate gratification. When we need to know something, we must know it immediately! This even applies to couples seeking pregnancy and their desire to find out if their monthly attempts have been successful. However, there is a problem with trying to prove pregnancy too promptly. In this episode, we will review a new publication just released on March 1st, 2026 out of the Green journal. These authors evaluated a prospective cohort (PRESTO cohort) of pregnancy planners to analyze their pregnancy test taking behaviors and their outcomes. The results are eye-opening. So, when is the best time to check a pregnancy test? Listen in for details. 1. Sundermann AC, Jasper EA, Jukic AMZ, Rothman KJ, Wise LA. Pregnancy Test Use and Timing of Pregnancy Detection in a Prospective Cohort of Pregnancy Planners. Obstet Gynecol. 2026 Mar 1;147(3):394-403. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006157. Epub 2026 Jan 8. PMID: 41505757; PMCID: PMC12788791.2. Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Dunson D, McChesney R, Weinberg CR. Natural Limits of Pregnancy Testing in Relation to the Expected Menstrual Period. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2001.

What an AMAZING lesson, Podcast Family, in this impromptu episode, we will hear from one of my former medical students, now BOARD-CERTIFIED OBGYN...and an incredible OB case she just had. Sometimes....we find ZEBRAS! Great job, Lauren!

Podcast family we've all heard the rumors that oursmartphones are “LISTENING TO US”. Well, some of that is actually true, and trust me I'm not a conspiracy theorist. Our smartphones are capable of remarkable things. A new publication from the Green journal (released ahead ofprint on 03/05/2026 ) is proposing that it may now be able to detect fetal movement, fetal breathing, and even fetal hiccups when placed over the abdomen! Yep, it's not science fiction... it's science innovation. While this is not ready for prime time just yet, the science is absolutely astounding. In this quicky episode we will briefly summarize a fascinating new innovative study which proposes that our iPhones may be able to be a fetal movement detector.1.     Moise, Kenneth Jr MD; Gaither, Kelly PhD;Madden-Rusnak, Anna PhD; Lowry, Kathy RN, MSN; Hutson, Emily RN, MSN; Bruns, Danielle RDMS; Valero, Reinaldo MD, RDMS. Smartphone Detection of FetalMovements Using Artificial Intelligence. Obstetrics & Gynecology ():10.1097/AOG.0000000000006228, March 5, 2026. | DOI:10.1097/AOG.00000000000062282.     Lai J, Woodward R, Alexandrov Y, et al Performanceof a Wearable Acoustic System for Fetal Movement Discrimination. PloS One. 2017. 3.     Ashik AK, Gutierrez R, Ashraf F, et al. AMachine Learning Model for Assessing Fetal Health During Pregnancy. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2025. 4.     Antepartum Fetal Surveillance: ACOG PracticeBulletin, Number 229. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021.5.     Monitoring a Pregnancy at Home With a SmartphoneThis wearable device provides real-time ECG monitoring of a fetus: https://spectrum.ieee.org/pregnancy-heartbeat-monitor-smartphone

Neuraxial analgesia (epidural or spinal) combined withtocolytic therapy is the pain control method that best increases the success rate of external cephalic version (ECV), according to the ACOG’s PB 221. However, some patients may be reluctant to use regional anesthesia and may askabout IV analgesia. A new study in the AJOG (released as an ePub on March 5, 2026) provides some insights that may be helpful for patient consultation. These investigators compared the success of external cephalic version, modes of delivery, maternal pain, and complications using three strategies: intravenous analgesia with remifentanil, epidural anesthesia, and a stepwise approach in which epidural anesthesia was administered only if intravenous analgesia was unsuccessful. Listen in for details.1.     ACOG PB 2212.     Aiartzaguena, Amaia et al. Comparativeeffectiveness of intravenous remifentanil, epidural anesthesia and a two-stepanalgesic approach for external cephalic version: a large prospectivesingle-center cohort study. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology,Volume 0, Issue 03.     Hao Q, Hu Y, Zhang L, et a l. A SystematicReview and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials of Neuraxial, Intravenous, andInhalational Anesthesia for External Cephalic Version. Anesthesia andAnalgesia. 2020. 4.     Wilson MJA, MacArthur C, Hewitt CA, et al.5.     Intravenous Remifentanil Patient-ControlledAnalgesia Versus Intramuscular Pethidine for Pain Relief in Labour (RESPITE):An Open-Label, Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial. Lancet. 2018.

The ACOG 2025 guideline specifically recommends either oral or vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening; it does not include buccal administration among its endorsed routes. With the rising rates of both obesity and labor induction, understanding the optimal agents for induction in obese patients is crucial. In a new study released ahead of print on March 4, 2026, in the AJOG, investigators from Indianapolis released findings from a secondary analysis of the IMPROVE trial (2019, AJOG) looking at the effect of obesity on buccal vs vaginal doses of misoprostol for cervical ripening. Listen in for details.1. Haas DM, Daggy J, Flannery KM, Dorr ML, Bonsack C, Bhamidipalli SS, Pierson RC, Lathrop A, Towns R, Ngo N, Head A, Morgan S, Quinney SK. A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;221(3):259.e1-259.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.037. Epub 2019 May 7. PMID: 31075246; PMCID: PMC7692024.2. ACOG July 2025: Cervical Ripening in Pregnancy, ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline No. 93. Bynarowicz, Taylor M. et al. The impact of body mass index on misoprostol dosing for labor induction: a comparison of vaginal and buccal dosage formsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Volume 0, Issue 0: https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(26)00126-2/fulltext4. Etrusco A, Sfregola G, Zendoli F, et al. Effect of Maternal Age and Body Mass Index on Induction of Labor Using Oral Misoprostol in Late-Term Pregnancies: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 2024. 5. Prostaglandin Versus Mechanical Dilation and the Effect of Maternal Obesity on Failure to Achieve Active Labor: A Cohort Study.6. Beckwith L, Magner K, Kritzer S, Warshak CR. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine : The Official Journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. 2017.

In this quickie episode, we will answer a question from one of our podcast family members: “Can a virgin get BV?”. It’s a complicated question, that needs explanation. PLUS, we will relate this to a former “event” from a past president- so listen until the end!1. Kim ES, Waltmann A, Duncan JA, Hood-Pishchany I.Advances in Treating Bacterial Vaginosis: Recognizing Sexual Transmission and Pipeline of Therapies. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. 2026. 2. Liu D, Zhang X, Zhao X, et al. Bacterial Vaginosis: Advancing Insights Into Microbial Dysbiosis. Critical Reviews in Microbiology. 2026. 3. Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, Vaneechoutte M, Temmerman M. The Epidemiology of Bacterial Vaginosis in Relation to Sexual Behaviour. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2010. 4. Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, Vaneechoutte M, Temmerman M. The Epidemiology of Bacterial Vaginosis in Relation to Sexual Behaviour. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2010.

For preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, the standard protocol for latency augmentation has remained IV amoxicillin and erythromycin for 2 days, followed by oral amoxicillin and erythromycin for 5 additional days. Nonetheless, azithromycinhas largely replaced erythromycin in PPROM management due to supply shortages and tolerability.  Previous retrospective studies (2019) have found no difference in latency between single-dose and multi-day azithromycin regimens, but these studies did not measure actual drugconcentrations at the site of action. In that 2019 retrospective study, there was also no difference in incidence of chorioamnionitis, or neonatal outcomes when comparing different dosing regimens of the azithromycin with erythromycin, with the exception of respiratory distress syndrome being more common in the 5 day azithromycin group. However, a 2024 single-center,retrospective study from Annals Pharmacotherapy found significantly higher rates of histologic chorioamnionitis with single-dose azithromycin compared to 5-day regimens(62.6% vs 46.4%, P=0.006), despite similar latency periods. So, it’s complicated. A 2025 systematic review of international guidelines found that 6 out of 17 clinical practice guidelines acknowledged uncertainty about the optimal antibiotic regimen. This was published in the AJOG. In this episode, wewill review a new publication from March 2026 in the AJOG which sought to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of 1 g once vs 500 mg daily dosing of azithromycin in the setting of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes and simulate various dosing regimens to identify the optimal regimen that maintains amniotic fluid concentration of azithromycin over the minimum inhibitory concentration of common GU pathogens associated with intraamniotic infection orinflammation. But there is a BIG limitation. Listen in for details. 1.    Navathe R, Schoen CN, Heidari P, Bachilova S, Ward A, Tepper J, Visintainer P, Hoffman MK, Smith S, Berghella V, Roman A. Azithromycin vs erythromycin for the management of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;221(2):144.e1-144.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 20.PMID: 30904320.2.    Kua S, Roman A, Harbinson L, Groom K, Whitehead C. Systematic review of nationaland international clinical practice guidelines for management of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Nov 22:S0002-9378(25)00866-X. 3.    Day KN, Vircks JA, Henricks CE, Reaves KM, Holmes AK, Florio KL. Latency Antibiotics in Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: A Comparison of Azithromycin Regimens. Ann Pharmacother. 2024 Mar;58(3):234-240. doi:10.1177/10600280231181135. Epub 2023 Jun 26. PMID: 38124306.4.   Boelig, Rupsa C. et al. Azithromycin in preterm prematurerupture of membranes: population pharmacokinetics and dose optimization. AmericanJournal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, March 2026.  SPONSER SITE: Visit www.perspectivemedical for more information on the Hemorrhage View C-Section Drape

Well podcast family welcome to the first installment of what will be a periodic recurrence, of our episode called, “QUICKIE”. These are meant to be quick snippet episodes to give a quick fact or medical /clinical reminder in contrast to our regular episodes which are a little bit more in detail and lengthy. In this first installment of our first QUICKIE episode, we're going to tackle the distinction between the diagnosis of fetal growth restriction based on abdominal circumference vs estimated fetal weight and how this affects management.1. ACOG CO 8312. ACOG PB 227

Probiotics. They are often marketed as the end of all and be all for all our health issues. And they CAN do some real good. There is NO DOUBT a connection with overall heath and gut health…and NO ONE can deny that. But probiotics gets grey for some women’s health issues. A new prospective, single-arm, non-blinded, multicenter study across 31 hospitals in Japan is making some pretty dramatic claims regarding oral probiotics and recurrent spontaneous preterm birth (ePUB). Can oral probiotics reduce spontaneous recurrent preterm birth? Listen in for details. 1. Prevention of Recurrent Spontaneous Preterm Delivery Using Probiotics: Results from a Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter Trial. PPP trial Collaborators et al.American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Volume 0, Issue 02. Grev J, Berg M, Soll R. Maternal probiotic supplementation for prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 12;12(12):CD012519. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012519.pub2. PMID: 30548483; PMCID: PMC6516999.3. Jarde A, Lewis-Mikhael AM, Moayyedi P, Stearns JC, Collins SM, Beyene J, McDonald SD. Pregnancy outcomes in women taking probiotics or prebiotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 8;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1629-5. PMID: 29310610; PMCID: PMC5759212.4. Othman M, Neilson JP, Alfirevic Z. Probiotics for preventing preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD005941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005941.pub2. PMID: 17253567; PMCID: PMC9006117.5. Timing of Probiotic Milk Consumption During Pregnancy and Effects on the Incidence of Preeclampsia and Preterm Delivery: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study in Norway.6. Nordqvist M, Jacobsson B, Brantsæter AL, Myhre R, Nilsson S, Sengpiel V. Timing of probiotic milk consumption during pregnancy and effects on the incidence of preeclampsia and preterm delivery: a prospective observational cohort study in Norway. BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):e018021. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018021. PMID: 29362253; PMCID: PMC5780685.7. Gao Q, Sun Y, Qu Y, Li F, Li P. The effect of probiotic supplementation during pregnancy on pregnancy complications: An umbrella meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Dec 19;104(51):e46409. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000046409. PMID: 41430994; PMCID: PMC12727282.SPONSOR WEBSITE: Visit perspectivemedical.org to learn more about the Hemorrhage View C-Section Drape

Neither the ACOG nor SMFM recommend strict bed rest for preterm birth prevention, or nor preeclampsia. Yet tradition often conflicts with evidence. A prior 2009 survey of MFM specialists, published in the AJOG, on the use of bed rest revealed that 71% used activity restriction in their practice for arrested preterm labor, despite the majority believing it had minimal or no benefit. The authors concluded, “Because most obstetricians in our survey indicated they would prescribe bed rest believing it was associated with minimal or no benefit, it is possible that even if a randomized, prospective trial showed no benefit associated with bed rest, it would still remain a common recommendation.” This brings us to a brand new publication from the Green Journal which is an ancillary study of two randomized trials of preterm birth prevention in women with a short cervical length. These authors sought to evaluate the amount of physical activity in patients at high risk for preterm birth and pregnancy latency and preterm birth. What did they find? It is a bit shocking. Listen in for details.1. Fox, Nathan S. et al. The recommendation for bed rest in the setting of arrested preterm labor and premature rupture of membranes. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Volume 200, Issue 2, 165.e1 - 165.e6 https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(08)00909-5/fulltext2. Sciscione, Anthony C. DO; Booker, Whitney A. for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network, Bethesda, Maryland. Activity Restriction in Pregnancy and the Risk of Early Delivery: The AWARE Study. Obstetrics & Gynecology ():10.1097/AOG.0000000000006225, February 19, 2026. | DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006225 https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=9900&issue=00000&article=01460&type=FulltextVisit our SPONSOR’s Webpage for information on the Hemorrhage View C-Section Drape: www.perspectivemedical.org

A study published in Nature Communications, published Feb 19, 2026, found that “pregnancy physically alters a woman’s brain, with a second pregnancy bringing even more profound effects.” The researchers “performed brain scans on 110 women. Some were first-time mothers, others second-time moms, and some nulliparous women. Results showed that during a first pregnancy, the greatest changes occur in the structure and activity of the ‘default mode network’ – the brain system responsible for self-reflection and mind wandering. Are these changes bad? Are they associated with long term hard? Are they adaptive? It’s a complex question, with real answers. Listen in for details.1. Straathof, M., Halmans, S., Pouwels, P.J.W. et al. The effects of a second pregnancy on women’s brain structure and function. Nat Commun 17, 1495 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69370-82. de Lange AG, Kaufmann T, van der Meer D, et al. Population-Based Neuroimaging Reveals Traces of Childbirth in the Maternal Brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019.3. Aleknaviciute J, Evans TE, Aribas E, et al.)Long-Term Association of Pregnancy and Maternal Brain Structure: The Rotterdam Study. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2022.4. Jung JH, Lee GW, Lee JH, et al. Multiparity, Brain Atrophy, and Cognitive Decline. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2020.5. Hu A, Xiong L, Wei H, et al. Association of Menarche, Menopause, and Reproductive History With Cognitive Performance in Older US Women: A Cross-Sectional Study From NHANES 2011-2014. BMC Public Health. 2025.6. Orchard ER, Ward PGD, Sforazzini F, et al. Relationship Between Parenthood and Cortical Thickness in Late Adulthood. PloS One. 20207. Hoekzema E, Barba-Müller E, Pozzobon C, et al. Pregnancy Leads to Long-Lasting Changes in Human Brain Structure. Nature Neuroscience. 2017.8. de Lange AG, Barth C, Kaufmann T, et al. Women's Brain Aging: Effects of Sex-Hormone Exposure, Pregnancies, and Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease. Human Brain Mapping. 2020.Visit our SPONSOR's LINK to learn more about the Hemorrhage view CS Drape: https://www.perspectivemedical.org/

Approximately 5–10% of all breast cancers are hereditary, and among those, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are responsible for about 60% of cases. Yet, overall, only about 1-2% of all breast cancers in the general population are caused by BRCA mutations. Once childbearing is complete, the NCCN recommends risk-reducing BSO in patients carrying these mutations. But what about the uterus? Since childbearing is complete, and the ovaries are now removed, the sole purpose of the uterus- which is to initiate, nourish, and grow a child -is no longer applicable. Is there a call for inclusion of a hysterectomy at time of risk reducing BSO? This has vast and important implications regarding subsequent hormone therapy. In this episode, which comes from one of our podcast family members, we will dive into the latest data pushing towards the inclusion of hysterectomy at time of prophylactic BSO. It's fascinating data from just last year (2025, in the Journal of the NCI). Listen in for details.1. Kotsopoulos J, Seca M, Gronwald J, et al. Menopausal Hormone Therapy and the Risk of Breast Cancer in Women With a Pathogenic Variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2025. 2. Kotsopoulos J, Gronwald J, Karlan BY, et al. Hormone Replacement Therapy After Oophorectomy and Breast Cancer Risk Among BRCA1 Mutation Carriers. JAMA Oncology. 2018

The ACOG states that, “Iron deficiency anemia during pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk of low birth weight, preterm delivery, and perinatal mortality and should be treated with iron supplementation in addition to prenatal vitamins. In addition, there may be an association between maternal iron deficiency anemia and postpartum depression, with poor results in mental and psychomotor performance testing in offspring”. Screening for anemia is included in most prenatal lab sets. However, up to 42% of women who enter prenatal care are iron deficient BEFORE anemia is detected. Iron deficiency itself, even without anemia, has also been linked to pregnancy morbidity. The ACOG currently does not have a statement endorsing universal ferritin screening in pregnancy outside of established anemia, but new data is challenging this (Jan 2026, Lancet). Listen in for details. 1. ACOG PB 2332. Wasim T, Bushra N, Nasrin T, Humayun S, Tajammul A, Khawaja KI, Irshad S, Fatima S, Yasin A, Zamora J, Cano-Ibáñez N, Fernandez-Felix BM, Khan KS; Ferritin screening and iron treatment for maternal anaemia and fetal growth restriction prevention (FAIR) Study Group. Intravenous iron for non-anaemic iron deficiency in pregnancy: a multicentre, two-arm, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. 2026 Jan;13(1):e22-e29. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00315-1. PMID: 41482443.3. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2024.15196

We recently covered an SMFM abstract that was presented at the annual Pregnancy Meeting held in early February 2026. The authors were from my Alma Mater, UT Southwestern/Parkland Hospital. This was a well-done study comparing 162 milligrams aspirin to 81 milligrams of aspirin. The results were very encouraging! However, aspirin definitely has an awkward acumen. It would be wonderful if ALL the data just leaned in the same direction... but it doesn’t! Enter our podcast family member, and my friend Alex. Alex sent me an incredible and insightful message which was a rebuttal to my Southwestern colleagues’ findings. In this episode you'll hear Alex's rebuttal and clinical conundrum, and we will explain why these two seemingly paradoxical findings makes sense. Listen in for details.1. Khander, Amrin MD; Thomas, Charlene MS; Matthews, Kathy MD; Christos, Paul DrPH; Alcus, Claire BA; Alam, Tanvir BS; Bush, Leah BA; Deshmukh, Diksha BA; Chasen, Stephen T. MD; Riley, Laura E. MD; Skupski, Daniel W. MD; August, Phyllis MD, MPH; Malha, Line MD, MS. Comparison of 162 mg and 81 mg Aspirin for Prevention of Preeclampsia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology 147(1):p 87-96, January 2026. | DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006100

Well, even though low dose aspirin has been recommended for the reduction of preeclampsia risk for many years, 2 controversies persist: 1. who should get it, and 2. the dose we should use. While the current US recommendation still focuses on 81 mg low dose aspirin, initiated after 12 weeks of gestation (based on risk factors), there's increased movement and growing data supporting both universal adoption and the higher dose of 162 mg. In this episode, we will briefly summarize brand new data out of UT Southwestern which was just published at the SMFM Annual Pregnancy meeting in Las Vegas. Listen in for details.1. https://www.smfm.org/news/new-studyroutine-aspirin-therapypreventsseverepreeclampsiainat-risk-populations2. ACOG CO 7433. The Effect of Aspirin on the Risk of Preeclampsia Based on the Fetal Medicine Foundation First Trimester Risk.4. Bujold E, Rolnik DL, Poon L, Syngelaki A, Wright D, Nicolaides KH. The effect of aspirin on the risk of preeclampsia based on the Fetal Medicine Foundation first-trimester risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Oct 31:S0002-9378(25)00808-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.10.032. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 41177290.

As BMIs and weights increase across the US population, there have been increased calls for universal screening for existing DM at entrance to prenatal care, if under 20 weeks. Others, including the ACOG, prefer to screen early those with additional risk factors (like prior GDM HX, prior macrosomia, BMI >30, PCOS, first degree relative with diabetes, or age >40). In July 2024, the ACOG released its publication, “Screening for Gestational and Pregestational Diabetes in Pregnancy and Postpartum”. In this guidance, it states, “At this time, there are insufficient data to support the best screening modality for pregestational diabetes in pregnancy, but consideration can be made to use the same diagnostic criteria as for the nonpregnant population (A1c value 6.5 or higher, or fasting plasma glucose value 126 mg/dL or higher, or 2-hour plasma glucose value 200 mg/dL or higher during a 75-g OGTT, or random plasma glucose value 200 mg/dL or higher in patients with classic hyperglycemia symptoms)”. However, a new proposed protocol has been published in AJOG for early screening for DM in pregnancy. This also describes the differences in diagnosis and care for Standard GDM diagnosed at 24-28 weeks, vs a diagnosis of pregestational DM diagnosis made prior to 20-weeks vs “early” GDM also diagnosed under 20 weeks of gestation. Listen in for details. 1. McLaren, Rodney et al.nA Proposed Classification of Diabetes Mellitus in PregnancyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Volume 0, Issue 0. Epub Feb 2, 2026; https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(26)00061-X/fulltext2. ACOG Clinical Practice Update: Screening for Gestational and Pregestational Diabetes in Pregnancy and Postpartum; July 2024; https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/abstract/2024/07000/acog_clinical_practice_update__screening_for.34.aspx3. Simmons, David et al. “Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed Early in Pregnancy.” The New England journal of medicine vol. 388,23 (2023): 2132-2144. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2214956

There has been a shift in cervical cancer screening from primary cytology based to HPV based. Even HPV screening has had its evolution from physician collected samples to patient self-collection, either in a clinical setting or at home with an approved collection system. In May 2025, the FDA cleared the first at-home self-collection kit for HPV screening, specifically the Teal Wand by Teal Health. Now, we are seeing the advent of POSSIBLY another avenue for cervical HPV testing- although it is a bit awkward: the use of menstrual blood as an HPV screening test. In this episode we will review a new cross-sectional, population-based study from China which compared testing menstrual blood for human papillomavirus during cervical cancer screening to clinician-collected cervical samples for human papillomavirus (HPV). This concept, and these results, are not new at all! And there are important limitations to consider at this time. Listen in for details.1. Testing menstrual blood for human papillomavirus during cervical cancer screening in China: cross sectional population based study. BMJ 2026; 392 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2025-084831 (Published 04 February 2026)BMJ 2026;392:e084831https://www.bmj.com/content/392/bmj-2025-0848312. Naseri S, Young S, Cruz G, Blumenthal PD. Screening for High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Using Passive, Self-Collected Menstrual Blood. Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep 1;140(3):470-476. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004904. Epub 2022 Aug 3. PMID: 35926207; PMCID: PMC9377370.3. Fokom Domgue J, Chandra M, Oladoyin O, Desai M, Yu R, Shete S. Women’s Preferences for Home-Based Self-Sampling or Clinic-Based Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening. JAMA Netw Open. 2026;9(2):e2558841. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.58841

Well podcast family, we are back with another installment of our “You ask, We answer” edition. We've got 2 fascinating and real-world clinical conundrums in this episode, both suggested by two separate podcast family members. The first has to do with RH IG maternal administration. Here's the question: If a patient receives routine, prophylactic RH IG at 28 weeks but then has maternal trauma say 1 or 2 weeks after, does she still require an additional dose of RH IG? That's a good question because it's not as intuitive as you would think. We will explain in this episode and there is a bit of a contradiction in the guidance. The second question has to do with finding an asymptomatic uterine rupture at cesarean section. Is there such a thing as a “partial” (silent) uterine rupture? There's recent data from 2025 about this. Listen in for details.1. ACOG PB 181; 2017. 2. Baek S, Froese V, Morgenstern B. Risk Profiles and Outcomes of Uterine Rupture: A Retrospective and Comparative Single-Center Study of Complete and Partial Ruptures. J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 15;14(14):4987. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144987. PMID: 40725680; PMCID: PMC12295210.3. Vandenberghe G, Bloemenkamp K, Berlage S, Colmorn L, Deneux-Tharaux C, Gissler M, Knight M, Langhoff-Roos J, Lindqvist PG, Oberaigner W, Van Roosmalen J, Zwart J, Roelens K; INOSS (the International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems). The International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems study of uterine rupture: a descriptive multi-country population-based study. BJOG. 2019 Feb;126(3):370-381. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15271. Epub 2018 Jun 12. PMID: 29727918.

Fetal Microcephaly has an incidence of 2 to 12 in10,000 births in the USA and can be diagnosed prenatally via ultrasound (in second or early third trimester) or postnatally via measurement of head circumference (HC).  Antepartum, this is a unique diagnosis since we are mainly used to using PERCENTAGES for biometrics and for fetal weight, butmicrocephaly is not diagnosed by HC percentage- but by Standard Deviation (SD). Microcephaly has been linked to developmental delay, seizures, as well as feeding, vision and hearing problems.  Prognosis depends on the severityof the microcephaly and whether it is associated with other anomalies. What SD is diagnostic of microcephaly? What are the potential etiologies? What genetic syndromes are most associated with true microcephaly? Is fetal cranial MRIrecommended? Listen in for details. 1.     Sukenik-Halevy R, Golbary Kinory E, Laron KenetT, Brabbing-Goldstein D, Gilboa Y, Basel-Salmon L, Perlman S. Prenatalgender-customized head circumference nomograms result in reclassification ofmicrocephaly and macrocephaly. AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Jan 29;3(1):100171. doi:10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100171. PMID: 36864987; PMCID: PMC9972400.2.     SOGC CO (2019) No. 380-Investigation andManagement of Prenatally Identified Microcephaly3.     Fetal Medicine Foundation: Microcephaly; https://fetalmedicine.org/education/fetal-abnormalities/brain/microcephaly