Democracy Nerd

In this episode of "Democracy Nerd," host Jefferson Smith engages in a crucial discussion with Paul Smith, the Senior Vice President at the Campaign Legal Center, shedding light on the mounting legal challenges surrounding ballot access heading into the 2024 election year. The conversation begins with the recent federal court action in North Dakota, where a judge dismissed a challenge regarding the validity of counting absentee ballots postmarked by Election Day. Smith provides insightful analysis on the significance of this ruling and its implications for preserving the integrity of the electoral process. Other topics discussed include the alarming trend of voter purges, prompting Smith to offer guidance to listeners on what steps to take if they suspect they've been incorrectly removed from voter rolls, ensuring their ability to participate in the electoral process. This episode also addresses the disturbing escalation in threats of violence targeting election workers. Smith addresses the implications of such threats and underscores the urgent need to ensure the safety and security of those tasked with administering elections. Overall, Paul Smith from the Campaign Legal Center underscores the critical importance of upholding voter rights, combating voter suppression tactics, and fortifying the foundations of democracy in the face of mounting challenges.

In the latest episode of the Democracy Nerd podcast, host Jefferson Smith engages in a thought-provoking conversation with Eliza Jane Schneider, a renowned dialect coach and operator of the Internet Dialect Database. The focal point of their discussion revolves around the intricate concept of freedom of speech and its implications in contemporary American society. Drawing from her extensive experience in the field of dialect coaching, Eliza sheds light on how Americans grapple with effective communication. She emphasizes the crucial role of listening as a fundamental component of freedom of speech, highlighting the challenges people face in truly understanding each other. Eliza challenges the prevailing notion of "cancel culture" and positions freedom of speech as its antithesis. Drawing on her unique perspective gained from working with Matt Stone and Trey Parker as a voice actress on "South Park," she offers insights into how creative expression can thrive when free speech is embraced. One fascinating aspect of the conversation is Eliza's one-person play, "Freedom of Speech," inspired by her extensive experience conducting over 7000 interviews spanning 30 years. Through this lens, she explores the nuances and complexities of free speech, providing a unique and compelling perspective on the subject. Overall, the episode delves into the multifaceted nature of freedom of speech, examining its connection to effective communication, the challenges posed by cancel culture, and the influence of creative endeavors like "South Park" on shaping our understanding of this essential democratic principle. Learn more about Eliza's play "Freedom of Speech" here  If you are in the Portland, Oregon area on Saturday, January 4th, come and see Eliza perform at the Alberta Abbey

In this episode, Jefferson is joined with Oscar Pocasangre, Senior Data Analyst for New America, to discuss the outsized impact of undecided voters on elections. Besides distinguishing undecided voters from swing or independent voters, Oscar explores the shared perspectives (if any) that might connect undecided voters as a cohesive group. The discussion highlights the significant impact undecided voters play every two to four years, depending on the election cycle. Oscar points out how the outsized influence undecided voters have maybe an overall detriment to democracy, as the issues that matter the most to this small slice of the electorate (whatever they may be) are magnified at the expense of the issues of importance to decided--or partisan--voters.

Amanda Frost, a professor at the University of Virginia School of Law and author of "You Are Not American: Citizenship Stripping from Dred Scott to the Dreamers" joins Democracy Nerd to discuss with Jefferson the history of citizenship stripping in the United States. The discussion delves into the intricate history of citizenship stripping, unraveling key legislative acts and Supreme Court cases that have shaped this complex narrative. Along with the landmark Dred Scott decision by the Supreme Court--which stripped citizenship of all Black people in the United States--and the Expatriation Act of 1907, Amanda provides insight on the various legal precedents that have influenced the concept of citizenship, including Wong Kim Ark's pivotal Supreme Court case that solidified the notion of "birthright citizenship" in the United States, a foundational principle that has played a crucial role in shaping the nation's identity. Amanda also discusses the story of Ethel Coope Mackenzie, a California suffragist who saw her citizenship stripped after marrying a native-born Scotsman, ultimately failing in an appeal to the Supreme Court which unanimously decided to not restore her American citizenship. Throughout the conversation, Amanda highlights the interconnected relationship between the promise of citizenship and waves of immigration, underscoring how this promise has historically fueled the influx of diverse populations, contributing to the transformation of the United States into an economic powerhouse. The episode weaves together legal history, individual stories, and broader socio-economic trends to offer a comprehensive understanding of the intricate tapestry of citizenship in the United States.

David Smith, D.C. Bureau Chief of The Guardian newspaper, joins Democracy Nerd to discuss recent events in Washington D.C. Topics covered include the historic ouster of Kevin McCarthy as House Speaker, an event that sent shockwaves through the political landscape. Smith reflects on the steps that led to the first-ever motion to vacate a sitting House Speaker by members of his own party. The move to vacate Kevin McCarthy as House Speaker has highlighted the deep divisions within the Republican party and raised questions about the future direction of the GOP. Also discussed is the passing of the esteemed 90-year-old Senator Dianne Feinstein, and whether California Governor Gavin Newsome successfully navigated politically tricky waters in the announcement of long-time California political Laphonza Butler as Feinstein's replacement. Also discussed are legal challenges faced by Senator Bob Menendez of New Jersey, who is under scrutiny due to federal indictments filed by the Justice Department, and whether Menendez's political career can survive demands by other Senate Democrats to step down from office. Finally, the New York court hearing of Donald Trump is also discussed, in which the former President has been found guilty of over-valuing property to secure favorable loans. Smith discusses the high likelihood that a convicted criminal will be the Republican nominee in the 2024 presidential election. David Smith provides invaluable insights into the various political challenges facing the United States. From internal party struggles to legal battles with far-reaching consequences, the nation stands at a pivotal moment in its history.

Sara Gifford, the co-founder and Chief Operating Officer of ActiVote, joins Democracy Nerd to discuss how the app offers a new way to engage people with the democratic process. ActiVote's mission is to make voting not just a civic duty but also an enjoyable and accessible experience, ultimately resulting in more engaged and informed voters. ActiVote was born out of the persistent challenge of low voter turnout and the disconnect many citizens feel from the political process. As a result, ActiVote relies on gamification to make voting fun and increase participation. ActiVote allows users to earn points, badges, and rewards for their civic engagement. This approach not only incentivizes people to vote but also encourages them to stay informed about political issues. The conversation also touches on the concerns surrounding the role of technology in elections and democracy. Gifford acknowledges these concerns but emphasizes that ActiVote is designed to be transparent, secure, and non-partisan. The platform is committed to safeguarding user data and ensuring the integrity of the voting process. While there are valid concerns about the role of technology in elections and democracy, ActiVote serves as a promising example of how technology can be harnessed to have a positive impact and strengthen the foundations of democracy.

Sarah Alvarez, founder of Detroit-based Outlier Media, and Chris Fitzsimon, publisher of States Newsroom, a national consortium of local newsrooms, join Democracy Nerd for a compelling conversation about how local newsrooms serve as community watchdogs, holding those in power accountable while helping make informed citizens. Local newsrooms are more than just news outlets; they are community builders. They celebrate local successes, cover events, and create spaces for community dialogue. However, they also provide essential accountability by investigating local issues and reporting on sensitive matters. Sarah and Chris also discuss the threats faced by local newsrooms, including this summer's raid on the Marion County Recorder in Kansas in which the local police force stormed the paper's office, seizing computers and reporting equipment. Such incidents have a chilling effect on investigative journalism, leading to a lack of transparency and accountability in communities. Sarah and Chris discuss strategies to support local newsrooms. Sarah's Outlier Media uses technology to understand community information needs, making local newsrooms more relevant. National efforts like States Newsroom provide resources, funding, and a network for local newsrooms to collaborate and amplify their impact. They emphasize that supporting local journalism is essential for a strong democracy. A robust democracy relies on well-informed communities, and local newsrooms are the foundation of this knowledge. However, they face unprecedented challenges and threats that require community support and collaboration.

Joshua Douglas, law professor at University of Kentucky and author of the forthcoming "The Voters v. The Court," joins the podcast to shed light on the significant developments and controversies surrounding the Supreme Court's 2023 term, touching on key decisions related to affirmative action, private business discrimination, and democracy. The contentious Students for Fair Admissions decision overturning affirmative action precedent for higher education admissions marks a significant shift in the Court's approach to issues of race and equality. The Court's 303 Creative ruling allows private businesses to discriminate for the first time. Other key decisions include Moore v. Harper and Allen v. Alabama, both of which have potential consequences for the future of democracy in this country. Also discussed the legitimacy crisis faced by the Supreme Court, currently viewed unfavorably by a large majority of Americans. This crisis poses a significant threat to the health of American democracy, as the Supreme Court plays a pivotal role in safeguarding the rule of law and protecting individual rights (or at least it should.)

What role should technology play in our political system? Is the Cambridge Analytica data mining scandal from the 2016 the cynical model that immediately comes to mind when tech and politics is discussed? Or should there be efforts to recapture Barack Obama's spirited use of social media in 2008 to unite a large coalition of disparate activists and voters? And with the recent emergence of AI, what sort of guardrails are needed to ensure the sanctity of our electoral process? Matt Krayton, owner and principal of Publitics consulting firm, joins the podcast to address these issues.

Robert Talisse, professor of philosophy at Vanderbilt University and the author of "Sustaining Democracy: What We Owe to the Other Side," joins the podcast to delve into the vital topic of accepting opposing political views as a cornerstone of a strong democracy. Talisse underscores the significance of open dialogue and constructive discourse in a democratic society. A democracy thrives when it fosters an environment where citizens recognize the legitimacy of diverse viewpoints, even those they disagree with vehemently. The recent statements by figures like Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican Congresswoman from Georgia, who suggested the appropriateness of executing political opponents, and Ron DeSantis, the Governor of Florida, who made violent remarks about his hypothetical presidency, have ignited debates about the limits of political rhetoric. Talisse highlights that such extreme statements not only undermine the principles of democracy but also exemplify the pressing need to encourage a more respectful and inclusive discourse. In an era where polarizing opinions can sometimes escalate into hostility, Talisse's insights offer a roadmap for creating a more resilient democratic society. By acknowledging that accepting opposing political views doesn't entail relinquishing one's convictions, but rather enriching the discourse, we can uphold the principles upon which democracies are built.

The 2022 midterm elections was the first after the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision tossed aside protections for reproductive rights under Roe v. Wade. As a result, women voters decidedly rejected Republican candidates, helping turn a long-assumed projected "red wave" into a "red trickle." As we head into the 2024 presidential election, not much has changed. And according to Lauren Leader, co-founder and CEO of All In Together, women voters are still galvanized and looking to continue having an impact electorally. Lauren joins the podcast to explain how women continue to have a political impact--local is best!--and provides a little tea-reading as to how women voters will influence the upcoming election.

The 2022 midterm elections was the first after the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision tossed aside protections for reproductive rights under Roe v. Wade. As a result, women voters decidedly rejected Republican candidates, helping turn a long-assumed projected "red wave" into a "red trickle." As we head into the 2024 presidential election, not much has changed. And according to Lauren Leader, co-founder and CEO of All In Together, women voters are still galvanized and looking to continue having an impact electorally. Lauren joins the podcast to explain how women continue to have a political impact--local is best!--and provides a little tea-reading as to how women voters will influence the upcoming election.

With its 6-3 ruling in Moore v. Harper, the Supreme Court has ruled that the (fringe? debunked?) Independent State Legislature Theory is dead. Eliza Sweren-Becker, Senior Counsel in the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, explains how this decision preserves democracy in the United States--at least for now.

Recorded on the day that the Supreme Court issued its Allen v. Milligan decision, Brad Snyder, Professor of Law at Georgetown University, joins the podcast to discuss his book "Democratic Justice: Felix Frankfurter, the Supreme Court, and the Making of the Liberal Establishment" and explains how the Supreme Court has *always* been "small c" conservative, Justice Frankfurter's commitment to judicial restraint, and also explains why J. Edgar Hoover once called Felix Frankfurter "the most dangerous man in America." After decades of hindsight, what is the proper way to view the complicated legacy of Justice Frankfurter--and how does his service compare and contrast to current Supreme Court justices?

Michael Waldman, President of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University, discusses his new book "The Supermajority: How the Supreme Court Divided America" and explains how the Roberts Supreme Court--instead of serving as a bastion of democracy--has undermined democratic principles through its reactionary and regressive decisions.

Anne Nelson, an award-winning journalist, author, and playwright, joins Democracy Nerd to discuss the Council for National Policy, which she initially featured in her 2019 book "Shadow Network: Media, Money, and the Secret Hub of the Radical Right." You haven't heard of the Council for National Policy, and have no idea how it impacts your life on a daily basis? Anne Nelson thinks you need to know more about this shadowy cabal--and how it's desperately pulling out all the stops to curtail democracy in the U.S.

Have you ever thought "Maybe *I* should run for office?" If so, then Amanda Litman has some advice for you: do it. Amanda co-founded Run For Something on Trump's inauguration day in 2017, with a goal to help progressive candidates get elected into office. Amanda joins the program to discuss the history of the organization and offer key advice to first-time candidates.

Author Paul Street joins the podcast to discuss his tenth book, "This Happened Here: Amerikaners, Neoloberals and the Trumping of America." Although those who warned that Trump would usher in an era of acceptable fascism were met with scorn or ridicule, Paul points out that they were correct. And may require a people-powered movement beyond the ballot box to ensure that Trump-branded fascism doesn't take a stronger hold.

In this excerpt as guest host of the Thom Hartmann Show, Jefferson speaks with Professor Nolan Higdon, author of "The Anatomy of Fake News" and "Let's Agree to Disagree: A Critical Thinking Guide to Communication, Conflict Management, and Critical Media Literacy," about historic examples of fake news, how to take steps to spot and resist fake news, and why four minutes taken out of 41,000 hours of video doesn't prove that January 6th was a peaceful sight-seeing tour instead of a violent insurrection.

Francisco Perez, Associate Professor Economics at the University of Utah, joins the podcast to discuss his essay "How Do We Build Back Black Wealth? Understanding the Limits of Black Capitalism," pointing out that a racially-diverse oligarchy is not the ideal end result for the purposes of economic and racial justice.