Never Seen It Podcast

In this episode of The Never Seen It Podcast, we dive into Guillermo del Toro’s highly anticipated 2025 adaptation of Frankenstein. We’re joined by Arnie, Amber, Alex (aka Filipino Grigio), Chris (MilkmanAmerica), and Donnie for a wild, funny, and surprisingly deep discussion about one of literature and cinema’s most iconic monsters.We kick things off by talking about why this movie was chosen, how del Toro’s name alone carries massive expectations, and how genre films—especially gothic horror—are still treated unfairly by major awards shows. We break down the film’s long list of Oscar nominations and debate whether genre movies can ever truly compete in “prestige” categories.From there, we get into the heart of the movie:the monster.We all agree that Jacob Elordi’s performance as the creature is the emotional backbone of the film. Even buried under makeup and speaking very little, his physical acting, expressions, and vulnerability make him the most compelling character on screen. We talk about how this version finally centers the monster’s pain, loneliness, and need for acceptance—something that hits surprisingly close to home.We also unpack:The gothic horror tone and how it leans into classic literatureThe stunning production design, sets, costumes, and lightingWhether the movie is “too long” or perfectly pacedIf Frankenstein would’ve worked better as a limited seriesHow del Toro’s auteur vision clashes with mass-audience expectationsWhy streaming changed how people experienced this filmAmber brings up the anxiety-inducing tower set piece (yes, that hole), and we all agree that the architecture alone deserves an award. Chris argues that the movie’s length made him want even more character development, while Alex defends del Toro’s artistic intent and reminds us that “too long” is subjective—especially in the world of gothic storytelling.We also compare this adaptation to Mary Shelley’s original novel, including the cut third act involving the Bride of Frankenstein, and discuss what it means that del Toro chose not to include it. That leads to a broader conversation about adaptation, faithfulness, and creative freedom.Finally, we wrap with rapid-fire takes on the strongest and weakest characters, how the film balances horror with drama, and why—even with flaws—this Frankenstein stands as one of the most visually striking and emotionally resonant monster films in years.

In this episode of The Never Seen It Podcast, we dive headfirst into Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another,” one of the most talked-about films of the 2025–2026 awards season. With a stacked cast including Leonardo DiCaprio, Sean Penn, Teyana Taylor, Chase Infinity, Regina Hall, Wood Harris, Tony Goldwyn, and Benicio Del Toro, this film has quickly become a lightning rod for controversy, praise, and heated debate.We start with a spoiler-light overview of the premise:After their extremist nemesis resurfaces 16 years later, a group of former revolutionaries reunite to rescue the daughter of one of their own—only to realize that the past is far from buried.From there, we ask the big question:Can “One Battle After Another” actually win Best Picture?With ten films competing—including Sinners, Hamnet, Marty Supreme, Train Dreams, and Begonia—we debate whether the Academy is spreading the love too thin, or quietly signaling which film will be the “safe” winner.The First Act: A Masterclass or Too Much, Too Fast?We spend a lot of time on the explosive opening act set in an internment camp, where we meet Leo and Teyana Taylor as revolutionaries fighting against a militarized white supremacist faction led by Sean Penn’s chilling “Lockjaw.”Some of us call it a screenwriting masterclass—a bold, in-media-res plunge into character, motivation, and chaos. Others feel it’s intentionally rushed, designed to shock us into the story rather than let us live in it.Politics, Relevance, and TimingWe wrestle with the idea that this film arrived at the exact wrong—or right—moment. The movie’s themes of extremism, surveillance, rebellion, and generational trauma feel ripped straight from today’s headlines.Is it art imitating life… or life imitating art?Chase Infinity: The Next Breakout StarWe also spotlight Chase Infinity’s performance as the daughter caught between revolution and survival. The visual parallels between her and her mother—especially the machine gun imagery—become one of the film’s most powerful generational echoes.Who Should Win the Oscar?Opinions clash:Some of us think Sinners will sweep the night.Others believe Hamnet is the Academy’s “safe” choice.A few of us argue that One Battle After Another is too bold to ignore—and might win because of the political climate, not in spite of it.And yes… we also go on a few wild tangents about:The Patriots conspiracy theoryBad Bunny, Green Day, and the Super BowlDesert Hot Springs, colonics, and cultsAnd why Timothée Chalamet might need to calm down 😅It’s chaotic, it’s hilarious, and it’s one of our most passionate film debates yet.

In this episode, we take on Good Boy (2025)—a haunting, emotionally strange horror film told largely through the eyes of a dog. The movie follows Indy, a loyal pup who moves with his owner Todd to a rural family home that may—or may not—be cursed. What begins as an eerie atmosphere slowly unfolds into something deeper, as the house, the illness, and the past all seem to blur together.We talk about why this film stood out as such a bold experiment in visual storytelling, from its decision to shoot at a dog’s eye level to its near-total absence of human facial closeups. The perspective shift forces us to experience fear, confusion, and loss in a completely different way—and we debate whether the movie would even work without this creative choice.Our conversation digs into the film’s layered themes:Is the “monster” a literal supernatural entity—or a metaphor for disease and generational trauma?Is the house cursed, or is it a symbol of inherited pain?Can animals sense things we can’t—whether that’s illness, danger, or something beyond logic?We also explore how Good Boy connects to other atmospheric horror films, the power of non-verbal storytelling, and why this movie feels more like a “vibes” experience than a traditional narrative. The discussion branches into topics like paranormal belief, emotional isolation, community, and how fear hits harder when an innocent animal is at the center of the story.Finally, we talk about what makes Indy such a compelling “lead,” why this movie feels deeply human despite barely showing human faces, and how Good Boy uses horror as a lens for grief, loyalty, and letting go.

In this episode of The Never Seen It Podcast, we take a deep, thoughtful, and often hilarious look at Train Dreams (2025), the Clint Bentley–directed period drama starring Joel Edgerton, Felicity Jones, and a scene-stealing William H. Macy .Chosen by special returning guest Chris (MilkmanAmerica), Train Dreams is described as “a thinking movie and a feeling movie” that challenges the idea of what it means for a film to be entertaining . Rather than focusing on traditional plot, the movie observes the quiet, often brutal life of a logger during the early 20th century as America undergoes massive industrial change.We talk about how the film feels intentionally “plotless” and why the narration is essential to grounding us in Robert’s internal life . With minimal dialogue and a slow, meditative pace, the movie asks us to sit with grief, silence, and memory instead of chasing spectacle.Key Topics We CoverExistential themes and the fragility of lifeThe devastating loss of Robert’s wife and daughter in the cabin fireWilliam H. Macy as the “Gandalf” archetype and why his death is so symbolicThe brutal realities of the railroad era and racial violence against Chinese workersWhether Joel Edgerton “carries” a film the way Leonardo DiCaprio doesThe meaning behind the sudden, shocking death of Apostle FrankWhy the movie feels like a meditation on grief rather than a traditional storyWe also explore how Train Dreams reflects the dangers of the industrial revolution, showing a world without safety nets, HR, or even basic sanitation. Life is cheap, work is deadly, and survival is never guaranteed.The Music & Nick Cave ConnectionThe score by Bryce Dessner and the original song by Nick Cave are subtle but emotionally devastating. Alex connects Cave’s real-life losses to the emotional weight of the film, arguing that grief is not just a theme—it’s the soul of Train Dreams .Final TakeThis episode is part film breakdown, part philosophy session, part chaos—and that’s exactly why we love it. Train Dreams may not be for everyone, but it’s a movie that lingers long after the credits roll.

In this episode of Never Seen It, we unpack Bugonia (2025), the latest mind-bending film from director Yorgos Lanthimos, and one of his most deceptively accessible movies to date. We went in blind—and quickly found ourselves spiraling into questions about conspiracy culture, corporate power, alienation (literal and metaphorical), and how trauma reshapes reality.We break down the film’s central premise: two conspiracy-obsessed men kidnap a powerful tech CEO, convinced she’s an alien sent to destroy Earth. What sounds absurd at first becomes increasingly plausible as the film unfolds. Jesse Plemons delivers a chilling performance as Teddy, a man whose grief, abuse, and ideological freefall lead him to radical certainty. Emma Stone is pitch-perfect as a hyper-controlled CEO whose emotional detachment blurs the line between capitalist overlord and extraterrestrial invader.We spend a lot of time wrestling with the film’s biggest question: at what point did we believe she really was an alien? From disturbing electroshock scenes set to pop music, to superhuman physical moments, to the horrifying calm with which violence is absorbed, Bugonia constantly shifts our certainty. Lanthimos weaponizes tone—jumping from dark comedy to outright dread—to keep us off balance.The episode also explores the film’s deeper themes, including:How conspiracy thinking often grows out of real traumaThe overlap between tech CEOs and “inhuman” behaviorThe symbolism of bees, control, and resource extractionPower dynamics between captor and captiveWhy making the conspiracy true is the film’s most unsettling choiceWe also discuss the film’s shocking supporting turns, including Stavros Halkias as a cop whose presence introduces another layer of moral rot, and how childhood abuse, corporate negligence, and ideological extremism all feed into the story’s bleak worldview.By the end, we agree on one thing: Bugonia isn’t just asking whether aliens walk among us—it’s asking whether unchecked power has already made monsters of us all.

In our latest episode of Never Seen It, we finally take on Zack Snyder’s 2011 cult favorite (and critical punching bag), Sucker Punch. What starts as a discussion about flashy visuals and over-the-top action quickly evolves into a deeper conversation about interpretation, symbolism, and whether the film has been unfairly dismissed over the years.We talk through the film’s central premise: a young woman institutionalized by her abusive stepfather escapes into elaborate fantasy worlds as a coping mechanism. From there, we debate one of the movie’s biggest questions: are these action sequences alternate dimensions, metaphorical fantasies, or a theatrical abstraction meant to challenge the audience? The ambiguity becomes a key point of discussion, especially as we unpack how the film frames reality, performance, and agency.A major focus of the episode is the idea that Sucker Punch may itself be a “sucker punch” to the audience, presenting itself as glossy, male-gaze-driven action while quietly subverting expectations with themes pulled straight from Joseph Campbell’s Hero’s Journey. We explore the theory that Baby Doll functions as a guardian angel or fragmented self for Sweet Pea, and how sacrifice, refusal of the call, and transformation play into the film’s controversial ending.We also spend time discussing female empowerment versus exploitation, pushing back on surface-level critiques that dismiss the movie outright. Is Snyder objectifying his characters, or is the film commenting on how women reclaim power within systems designed to control them? We don’t fully agree, but that tension is exactly what makes the conversation compelling.The episode also dives into Snyder’s visual style, comparing it to video game cutscenes, music videos, and heightened fantasy aesthetics. While we’re critical of the script in places, we all agree that Snyder knows how to compose striking images, and that Sucker Punch never looks bad, even when it frustrates.We highlight standout performances from Emily Browning, Abby Cornish, Jenna Malone, Vanessa Hudgens, Jamie Chung, Oscar Isaac, Carla Gugino, and even a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it Jon Hamm appearance. We also talk about Browning’s surprisingly restrained performance and her decision to step away from major franchise stardom.Music plays a huge role in this episode as well. We break down the significance of Björk’s “Army of Me” and “Where Is My Mind?”, discussing how the soundtrack reinforces the film’s themes of agency, motivation, and internal conflict. The music isn’t just aesthetic, it’s narrative.Ultimately, this episode isn’t about declaring Sucker Punch a hidden masterpiece or a total failure. It’s about wrestling with a movie that sparks debate, invites multiple interpretations, and refuses to fit neatly into one box. Whether you love it, hate it, or are just confused by it, Sucker Punch gives us plenty to talk about, and we do.

In this episode, we finally tackle Quentin Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, a film that has only grown more divisive with time. We approach it not just as a Tarantino film, but as a meditation on Hollywood nostalgia, aging masculinity, and the mythmaking power of cinema itself.We start by talking about the film’s loose, meandering structure and how it operates more like a hangout movie than a traditional narrative. Rather than building toward constant plot escalation, the movie asks us to live alongside Rick Dalton and Cliff Booth as they drift through late-1960s Los Angeles. For some of us, that vibe is intoxicating; for others, it can feel indulgent and self-satisfied.We spend a lot of time on Leonardo DiCaprio’s performance as Rick Dalton, breaking down how his insecurity, desperation, and occasional self-awareness make him one of Tarantino’s most human characters. His fear of irrelevance hits especially hard in a story obsessed with the end of an era. We contrast that with Brad Pitt’s Cliff Booth, cool, capable, and intentionally opaque, and debate whether the character is aspirational, troubling, or both.Margot Robbie’s Sharon Tate becomes a major point of discussion as well. We examine Tarantino’s choice to portray her more as a presence than a fully fleshed-out character, and whether that approach feels respectful, reductive, or somewhere in between. Her scenes embody the film’s nostalgia but also raise questions about agency and perspective.Naturally, we dig into Tarantino’s revisionist history and the insane third act. We talk about why rewriting real-world violence into cathartic fantasy has become such a defining feature of his later career, and whether Once Upon a Time in Hollywood earns that ending emotionally and thematically.By the end, we land in a complicated place. We admire the craft, performances, and atmosphere, even as we wrestle with the film’s pacing, indulgence, and tonal choices. It’s a movie we don’t entirely love, but one we can’t stop thinking about, which might be the most Tarantino outcome possible. 

In this episode, we sit down to discuss Left-Handed Girl, the 2025 film directed by Shih-Ching Tsou, making her long-awaited solo directorial debut after years of collaboration with Sean Baker (Take Out, Tangerine, Anora). The film follows a mother and her two daughters as they relocate to Taipei to open a noodle stand in a bustling night market, hoping for a fresh start—only to find that family secrets, tradition, and unresolved trauma come with them.We talk about how Left-Handed Girl uses the idea of left-handedness as both a literal and symbolic device, touching on cultural superstition, childhood imagination, and the way shame and fear can be passed down through generations. The character of I-Jing becomes a fascinating lens for how kids internalize adult anxieties, sometimes in playful ways, sometimes in destructive ones.Visually, we break down how the film was shot largely on an iPhone, and why it never feels like a gimmick. Instead, the vibrant colors, natural lighting, and fluid camera movement make Taipei feel alive. The night markets, streets, and small apartments aren’t just settings—they’re characters. We discuss how limited resources, small crews, and real locations actually enhance the authenticity of the film rather than holding it back.We also share insights from the San Diego Asian Film Festival, where the film screened and where Shih-Ching Tsou participated in a Q&A, including the revelation that Left-Handed Girl had been in development for nearly two decades. That long gestation shows in the confidence of the storytelling and the emotional precision of the performances—especially from the young lead, who delivers one of the most natural child performances we’ve seen in recent years.Throughout the episode, we reflect on why films like Left-Handed Girl are so inspiring for independent filmmakers, how Sean Baker’s influence can be felt without overpowering Tsou’s voice, and why this quiet, observational drama lingers long after the credits roll. If you’re interested in Asian cinema, indie filmmaking, or character-driven storytelling, this is one we highly recommend.Join our Discord!    

In this episode of Never Seen It, we finally sit down with Joe Dante’s Gremlins (1984), a movie that somehow balances Christmas cheer, creature-feature horror, slapstick comedy, and sharp social commentary all at once.We talk about watching Gremlins through fresh eyes, especially for those of us who only remembered scattered images from childhood like Gizmo in the toy car, the bar scene, or Stripe causing chaos. Rewatching it now, we explore how the film functions as both a holiday movie and a subversive horror film, complete with genuinely dark moments hiding under its family-friendly reputation.The conversation digs into practical effects and puppetry, praising how the gremlins’ physical presence gives the movie a texture that modern CGI often can’t replicate. We also highlight how the green blood, exaggerated violence, and cartoon logic allowed the film to push boundaries while still landing a PG rating.We examine the film’s Reagan-era themes, including American consumerism, corporate greed, and authority figures who are hilariously useless when things go wrong. That naturally leads us into a candid discussion about the movie’s problematic racial elements, particularly how Eastern mysticism and warnings are ignored and what that says about Western arrogance baked into the story.We also connect Gremlins to its cinematic lineage, including Chris Columbus’s original script, Steven Spielberg’s producer influence, Jerry Goldsmith’s iconic score, and how the film echoes earlier gremlin myths, The Twilight Zone, and even Bugs Bunny cartoons.Of course, we can’t avoid some of the movie’s most infamous moments, including Phoebe Cates’ wildly dark monologue, the bar scene chaos, and the sheer audacity of calling this a Christmas movie. We wrap things up with final ratings, thoughts on rewatchability, and whether Gremlins still works for new generations, including whether it’s safe or insane to show it to kids.Whether you’re a lifelong fan or watching it for the first time, Gremlins proves that holiday movies don’t have to be wholesome to be unforgettable.

In this end-of-year wrap-up episode of the Never Seen It Podcast, we take a step back from our usual deep dives and instead run through a rapid-fire list of movies that stood out to us this year, an intentionally uncomfortable storyfilms we watched, argued about, and couldn’t stop thinking about, even if they never got a full episode of their own.We kick things off by reflecting on the sheer volume of movies released this year and why this episode exists in the first place: there’s simply too much great cinema to cover everything in depth. That leads us into a broader conversation about what we’re excited to see next year, including upcoming releases, returning franchises, and how modern studios are increasingly blurring the line between filmmaking and corporate branding.One of the central discussions revolves around Eddington, a deeply polarizing film set during the early days of the pandemic. We break down Joaquin Phoenix’s unsettling performance as a small-town sheriff, Pedro Pascal’s role as a politically charged mayor, and how the film layers social unrest, tribal land jurisdiction, and media spectacle into a story that’s intentionally uncomfortable. While not all of us landed in the same place on the movie, the conversation highlights how messy, challenging films can still be worth engaging with.From there, we pivot into a nostalgic but revealing discussion about Ghost World and the evolution of color in cinema. We talk about how films from the late ’90s and early 2000s embraced bold, vibrant color palettes—even when the characters themselves were cynical or emotionally detached—and how modern movies and TV shows often favor muted, gray color grading. This sparks a broader conversation about “millennial gray,” production design, and how visual storytelling subtly affects how we emotionally experience films.One of the biggest moments of the episode comes when we talk about watching Jaws for the first time. We dig into why Steven Spielberg’s 1975 classic still works so well today, how its themes of political denial and public safety feel eerily modern, and why its restraint—especially the limited use of the shark—makes it more terrifying than many contemporary horror films. We also unpack its massive cultural influence, from John Williams’ iconic score to references that continue popping up in movies, TV shows, and pop culture decades later.Throughout the episode, we weave in personal anecdotes, side tangents, and genuine laughs—whether we’re talking about movie theaters, live concert screenings, classic directors, or the slow realization that we’re all getting older. We wrap things up by thanking listeners for sticking with us, shouting out new followers, and reflecting on the fact that the podcast has now been running for over five years.This episode is less about rankings and more about celebrating why we love movies in the first place—how they linger, how they change with time, and how watching them together makes the experience even better.

In this episode, we dive deep into the film’s powerful and unsettling portrayal of schizophrenia, paying special attention to how the sound design creates an authentic sense of what it feels like to hear literal voices in your head. We talk about how the film uses audio to make the audience experience the same eerie confusion, fear, and disorientation that someone with schizophrenia might face.We also explore the theme of secrets and how both central characters are hiding major parts of their lives from each other. Lucy Liu’s character is carrying a significant secret about her health, while her son struggles silently with symptoms he does not fully understand. We discuss how these unspoken truths build emotional walls between them and how the film uses these barriers to highlight the importance of communication in relationships.Throughout the conversation, we look at how the lack of openness intensifies their struggles and how their journey reflects real-world challenges around mental health, trust, and vulnerability. We share our takeaways on why empathy and understanding are essential when dealing with mental health issues and how better communication could have changed the trajectory of their story.If you’re interested in mental health representation in film, the psychology of sound design, or character-driven storytelling, this episode provides a thoughtful, engaging, and insightful breakdown of how the movie tackles schizophrenia, secrets, and emotional connection.Join our Discord!Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.comYouTubeTikTok FacebookTwitchInstagramFollow us across all social media:Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)Justn - @GhostNerd88Alex - @dailydaresDonnie - @_donnieappleseedArnold - @arniecallego 

In this episode, we take a deep dive into The Black Phone and unpack the film’s blend of real-world horror and supernatural mystery. We explore how Derrickson uses 1970s true-crime anxieties, child abductions, and local paranoia to ground the story’s paranormal elements, while also asking whether the film fully commits to either side of its identity. We break down Ethan Hawke’s chilling performance as The Grabber and discuss why his motives, rituals, and connection to the black phone itself remain so ambiguous. We question whether the movie intentionally leaves major narrative gaps in hopes of expanding into a franchise—especially since many elements feel like setup for a larger mythology that didn’t materialize until years later when the sequel finally arrived. We also get into the design of The Grabber’s masks, the concept of “naughty boy,” and Finney’s mysterious ability to hear the phone. Does it imply something supernatural about him? Was he always meant to be the final victim? And does the film subtly tease the Grabber’s transformation into a more mythic, Freddy-Krueger-like entity? These theories are all on the table, and we compare them to what the film actually provides onscreen. Finally, we discuss how the movie uses its short runtime—whether it’s lean and effective, or whether it sacrifices crucial character depth and world-building. With so many ideas introduced but not fully explored, we talk about what The Black Phone 2 might clarify, expand, or even retcon after the first film’s unresolved threads. We examine the film’s themes, unanswered questions, and what truly makes it resonate with viewers, even when parts of the story feel underdeveloped. If you’ve ever wondered what The Grabber actually wants—or what the franchise could become—you’re in the right place.Join our Discord!Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.comYouTubeTikTok FacebookTwitchInstagramFollow us across all social media:Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)Justn - @GhostNerd88Alex - @dailydaresDonnie - @_donnieappleseedArnold - @arniecallego 

In this episode, we're cracking open the containers and digging into the 2004 (released 2008) indie gem, Take Out, co-directed by the brilliant Sean Baker and Shih-Ching Tsou. We are the Never Seen It podcast, and we're all about fresh perspectives on films we should have seen by now.We start by discussing why we chose this film, connecting it to the San Diego Asian Film Festival and the new work from co-director Shi Qing Su. From there, we sink our teeth into the movie's simple yet powerful plot: an undocumented Chinese immigrant, Ming, must pay back a smuggling debt by the end of a single, grueling day working as a deliveryman in New York City.Our conversation covers the signature Sean Baker filmmaking style—the gritty, guerrilla-style, cinema verité approach that makes you feel the rain-soaked streets and claustrophobic apartments of New York. We talk about how the city itself becomes a character, a relentless force that Ming must battle against.We delve deep into the film's themes, including:The immigrant struggle in America and the immense pressure to provide for a family left behind.The brutal reality of the service industry and the often-unseen hustle of delivery workers.The powerful social realism that makes the story feel less like fiction and more like a documentary.The stark contrast between life pre- and post-smartphones, and how technology has changed the nature of this kind of work.We share our personal connections to the film's themes, from our own experiences in the food service industry to financial hustles that echo Ming's desperate race against the clock. We also highlight the incredible collaboration between Sean Baker and Shi Qing Su, noting her crucial role and continued influence in his later works like Tangerine, The Florida Project, and Red Rocket.Tune in for our full Letterboxd-style reviews, Arnold's official "Snooze-a-Meter" rating, and a heartfelt discussion on why this micro-budget film remains so impactful and relevant today. This is a must-listen for fans of independent cinema, social realist films, and anyone who wants to understand the roots of Sean Baker's filmography.

In this episode of the Never Seen It podcast, we sit down together and unpack Ryan Coogler’s 2025 vampire horror film Sinners. We went into this one with a mix of hype and curiosity, and the conversation pretty much exploded in every direction because the movie gives us a lot to work with. We talk about how the film blends genres, how it holds back on revealing its horror elements until almost an hour in, and how that decision affects the pacing. Some of us loved the slow burn, and some of us felt the setup went on a little long, but we all agreed that once the movie kicks into gear, it really delivers.One of the biggest talking points for us is the look of the film. Coogler and cinematographer Autumn Durald Arkapaw shot Sinners on IMAX and Ultra Panavision 65 millimeter film, which blew us away when we realized it. We dig into how the film uses the widest lenses available and leans into those massive Delta landscapes and intimate church and juke joint sequences. We talk about how switching formats subtly prepares the viewer for what is coming next, and how even if you are not actively watching for those choices, they hit you on a subconscious level.Music became one of our favorite parts of the discussion. Sinners is soaked in it, from blues to jazz to gospel to spoken word. We get into how the film treats music as identity, history, and survival. There is a whole section of the movie that shows the evolution of Black music across generations, and we all thought it was one of the most magical scenes in the film. We also loved the casting of Saul Williams as the preacher father. Several of us were huge fans of his slam poetry work, so seeing him here sparked a whole tangent about spoken word, performance, and even a side journey into Stomp and Blue Man Group.We also spend a lot of time talking about character work, especially Michael B. Jordan playing twin brothers Smoke and Stack. We talk about their dynamic, how we wanted more time with them, and how Jordan brings effortless charisma to both roles. We also get into Sammie, played by newcomer Miles Caton in his first major film role, and how his performance stands out. That leads us into a conversation about the Cyclops guitar he uses and how it becomes a symbolic object in the story.A major theme we explore is the film’s metaphor around vampirism, culture, and exploitation. The idea of vampires as soul suckers of Black culture really hits us, and we talk about how making the vampire villains Irish adds another layer because of their own history with discrimination. We also debate whether the vampires are truly evil or simply another community seeking survival. That leads into a deeper talk about freedom, equality, and how the film frames immortality as another form of bondage. Alex brings up how becoming a vampire might prevent you from moving on and seeing the loved ones waiting for you on the other side, which ties directly into Smoke’s story and the film’s emotional core.We also discuss the film’s religious elements. Donnie brings up the preacher’s warning about blues being devil music and how the real message is tied more to the environment and associations than the music itself. We talk about how Sinners uses scripture, temptation, and spiritual symbolism to highlight cultural pressure and manipulation.A big part of our conversation focuses on awards chances, Oscar snubs, and how prestige shapes the fate of movies like this. We compare Sinners to other genre films that got ignored and talk about how award shows miss the mark on horror and culturally rich stories.As always, we have plenty of tangents, jokes, and off the rails moments. We talk about vinyl collections, VHS tapes, Comic Con merch flips, pyramid schemes, and even what music we all put on when we are setting a mood. There are a lot of laughs, a few chaotic moments from the live chat, and a whole lot of love for the movie.By the end, we give our ratings. Several of us landed in the four to five star range. Adrian gives his detailed review, calling the film stylish, well acted, thematically rich, and respectful of its material even if the pacing is a little top heavy. We all agreed that Sinners swings big and lands more often than not.If you love movies with big ideas, stacked performances, and conversations that go from deep analysis to absolute nonsense, this is a good one.Join our DiscordCheck out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more at www.neverseenitpodcast.comYouTubeTikTokFacebookTwitchInstagramFollow us across all social mediaAdrian - @b00tz2big / b00ks2big on TikTokJustn - @GhostNerd88Alex - @dailydaresDonnie - @_donnieappleseedArnold - @arniecallego

In this episode of the Never Seen It podcast, the hosts take a deep dive into the highly anticipated horror film Weapons. As one of the most talked-about horror releases of the year, Weapons has sparked widespread discussion and debate—and the hosts explore exactly why. From its chilling atmosphere to its multi-perspective storytelling, this episode unpacks the film’s many layers and what makes it such a standout entry in modern horror.The conversation kicks off with the technical challenges of streaming and the hype surrounding Weapons before moving into a detailed breakdown of the film’s themes. Parental fear emerges as a central thread, underscoring how the movie weaponizes emotional vulnerability. The hosts also examine the subversion of traditional villain archetypes, the film’s haunting visual aesthetic, and how its nonlinear storytelling and multiple POVs enhance its emotional impact.Symbolism plays a major role in Weapons—from the imagery of the assault rifle to the recurring triangle motif—inviting multiple interpretations and deeper readings of fear, control, and morality. The hosts discuss how these symbols connect to broader cultural and psychological ideas, including the Mandela Effect, collective memory, and how real-world trauma influences art.The discussion expands to include the evolution of horror filmmaking and how Weapons fits into the genre’s current trajectory of innovation. Touching on moments of humor, surreal tension, and emotional intensity, the hosts reflect on how Weapons balances horror with humanity. They also explore how childhood trauma and societal anxieties shape the film’s characters and story arcs, creating a narrative that’s as unsettling as it is thought-provoking.By the end of the episode, the hosts share their final thoughts and ratings—debating the film’s effectiveness, its place among recent horror masterpieces, and the lingering questions it leaves behind. Weapons is more than just another horror flick—it’s a dark mirror held up to modern fears, and this episode unpacks every loaded frame.Join our Discord!Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.comYouTubeTikTok FacebookTwitchInstagramFollow us across all social media:Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)Justn - @GhostNerd88Alex - @dailydaresDonnie - @_donnieappleseedArnold - @arniecallego 

In this episode, we revisit The Crow — one of the most haunting and beloved cult classics of the ’90s. We talk about the film’s gothic atmosphere, Alex Proyas’ stunning direction, and how Brandon Lee’s final role became a powerful symbol of art born from grief.We break down The Crow beat by beat, analyzing its visual storytelling, miniature cityscapes, and how the movie captures loss and vengeance through poetic, comic-book noir. We also discuss the original comic by James O’Barr and the deep emotional pain that inspired it.From the eerie coincidence of Hollywood once pitching The Crow as a Michael Jackson musical, to the movie’s groundbreaking soundtrack featuring Nine Inch Nails and The Cure, we unpack the cultural legacy that keeps fans returning again and again.Of course, we take time to remember Brandon Lee — celebrating his legacy, his artistry, and the profound impact his passing had on both the production and the entire film industry.Whether you’ve seen The Crow once or a hundred times, this episode will remind you why it still resonates with audiences who “can’t rain all the time.”Listen now wherever you get your podcasts and join the conversation.#TheCrow #BrandonLee #CultClassic #FilmPodcast #MovieDiscussionJoin our Discord!Follow us across all social media:Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)Justn - @GhostNerd88Alex - @dailydaresDonnie - @_donnieappleseedArnold - @arniecallegoCheck out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs a,nd more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.comYouTubeTikTok FacebookTwitchInstagram   

We start by introducing the “Hardcore Four” crew—Adrian, Arnold, Alex, and Justin—before diving into Justin’s pick for the Halloween episode, Overlord. Justin explains why he chose the film and how it flew under the radar when it first came out despite being produced by J.J. Abrams. From there, the discussion evolves into a mix of serious film talk and pure comedy as we unpack what makes Overlord such a unique hybrid of action, horror, and war. We discuss the movie’s standout moments, from the shocking opening plane sequence to the grotesque reanimation scenes in the Nazi lab. We also geek out over the attention to detail in the set design and pyrotechnics, which helped the practical effects stand out against the CGI-heavy landscape of modern horror films.The crew riffs on cultural and historical details, like how Nazi soldiers were reportedly on meth and obsessed with the occult, and joke about how trippy warfare might’ve looked if acid and glow sticks were involved. Adrian connects the film’s tone to video games like Castle Wolfenstein, while Arnold and Alex take the conversation into some hilarious and bizarre territory about Filipino and Mexican superstitions, the idea of immortality, and what it would mean to live forever. We even manage to tie that back to the themes of Overlord and how it questions the morality of power, science, and human experimentation.Between all the banter, we bring real insight to the film’s themes—how Boyce evolves from a scared soldier into a leader, how Ford’s sacrifice seals the story’s moral weight, and how the lack of overt racial commentary actually makes Boyce’s heroism even stronger. We talk about the deeper implications of war horror, the human cost behind “super soldier” fantasies, and how Overlord could easily be reimagined as a series or expanded universe.By the end, we unwind into our usual post-show chaos, shouting out our Twitch and TikTok audience, joking about “National Nut Day,” and teasing what’s coming next. We close by reflecting on how Overlord deserves more love as a clever, brutal, and surprisingly emotional war-horror gem that never got its due.Join our Discord!https://discord.gg/E8qTHwGfFollow us across all social media:Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)Justn - @GhostNerd88Alex - @dailydaresDonnie - @_donnieappleseedArnold - @arniecallegoCheck out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com* YouTube* TikTok * Facebook* Twitch #Overlord #NeverSeenItPodcast #HorrorMovies #WW2Horror #FilmDiscussion #ChuckleHut #MoviePodcast #WyattRussell #PracticalEffects #HalloweenMovies

In this episode, we sit down with filmmaker Guile Branco to talk about his darkly funny and deeply human horror-comedy A Halloween Feast. We dive into how the film mixes absurd humor, classic horror vibes, and social commentary — all while exploring heavy themes like generational trauma and the ways we inherit dysfunction from those who came before us.We talk about Guile’s free-flowing writing process — how he lets ideas come organically without over-structuring too early — and how that spontaneity led to the film’s bold tone and surprising emotional beats. A Halloween Feast doesn’t just deliver laughs and scares; it lands with a twist that reframes the characters’ relationships in a way that sticks with you long after the credits roll.One of the most fascinating parts of our conversation was hearing about how Guile balanced acting and directing at the same time. He opens up about the mental juggling act of switching between performer and filmmaker, and how having a strong assistant director made all the difference on set. We also dig into the realities of indie filmmaking — tight budgets, limited time, and the resourcefulness it takes to pull off something ambitious with minimal means.Guile shares his thoughts on audience reactions and how screenings, especially at festivals, can be the truest test of a film’s success. He reminds us that filmmaking doesn’t stop once you call “cut.” There’s an entire journey in marketing and distribution, and he’s refreshingly candid about the challenges of getting an independent film out into the world. His story with Breaking Glass Pictures and O2 Play shows just how much persistence and smart strategy it takes to find your audience.For aspiring filmmakers, this episode is full of insight. Guile emphasizes that the most important thing you can do is to write — get your ideas down, even if they’re messy, and don’t wait for perfection. He encourages young creators to take risks, trust their instincts, and use whatever resources they have to make something authentic.We loved talking to Guile not just about A Halloween Feast as a movie, but as a creative journey — one built on passion, collaboration, and a fearless sense of humor in the face of chaos. Whether you’re into indie horror, absurd comedy, or just the behind-the-scenes grind of filmmaking, this is a conversation you won’t want to miss.🎧 Listen now and don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more deep dives into the art (and madness) of independent cinema.Join our Discord!https://discord.gg/E8qTHwGfFollow us across all social media:Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)Justn - @GhostNerd88Alex - @dailydaresDonnie - @_donnieappleseedArnold - @arniecallegoCheck out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com, 

Show Notes:In this episode of The Never Seen It Podcast, we dive deep into how the movie world keeps evolving and what that means for fans, creators, and casual viewers alike. 🎬 From streaming platforms changing the way we watch to the explosion of remakes, adaptations, and fan casting, we explore how modern cinema continues to reinvent itself.,,We’re joined by special guest Chris aka MilkManAmerica, who works with Arnold and brings his own brand of humor (and a few ghost stories 👻) straight from their office. Together with Alex, the crew swaps stories from recent Halloween haunt events, breaks down the current state of conventions like Comic-Con, and reflects on the surprising rise of Pedro Pascal as one of Hollywood’s most beloved stars.Throughout the episode, we look at how storytelling and direction shape the soul of a film, and how social media can completely change how audiences perceive a movie. There’s plenty of laughter, pop culture analysis, and even a few predictions about where the industry is heading next—from indie studios making waves to anime culture taking center stage at conventions.Whether you’re a casual moviegoer or a die-hard film buff, this episode is packed with insights, behind-the-scenes banter, and the kind of thoughtful but funny discussion that makes The Never Seen It Podcast a go-to for film and pop culture fans alike.🎧 Listen now on YouTube, Spotify, or Apple Podcasts and don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more movie talk, pop culture, and chaos!Episode Takeaways:The podcast serves as a platform for casual movie discussions.Fan casting can be a fun way to engage with films.Remakes and adaptations dominate the current film landscape.Streaming services have changed how audiences consume movies.Anticipated films often reflect current societal themes.Directors play a crucial role in shaping the narrative of films.Social media influences public perception of movies.Storytelling remains a vital aspect of filmmaking.The future of cinema may lean towards streaming and digital releases.Engaging with films can lead to deeper discussions about art and culture.Live shows create unique dynamics and audience engagement.Pedro Pascal's rise in media reflects a late-blooming career.Halloween haunt events offer thrilling experiences worth documenting.The state of Comic-Con is shifting with fewer big studio promotions.Ghost stories can add a fun twist to office life.Conventions are evolving, focusing more on art and comics.Smaller studios are gaining traction at conventions.Anime culture is becoming increasingly prominent at events.The future of conventions may lean towards more intimate experiences.Networking and collaboration are key in the podcasting world.

Welcome back to The Never Seen It Podcast! This week, the gang—Adrian (@b00tz2big), Alex (@filipinogrigio), Justin (@ghostnerd88), Donnie (@donnieappleseed_), and Arnold (@arnieda1manparty)—take a wild trip through The Doom Generation (1995), Gregg Araki’s cult classic of sex, violence, and absurdity.Chosen by Alex, the film sparks a lively discussion about Araki’s place in ‘90s indie cinema alongside Tarantino, Kevin Smith, and Spike Jonze. The crew dives into the director’s signature chaos: neon-drenched lighting, exaggerated violence, and surreal comedy that somehow distills a simple story about three lost kids searching for meaning.They talk about the film’s queer undercurrents—Araki calling it his “heterosexual movie,” while still exploring fluidity, repression, and the politics of identity. Adrian draws parallels to modern filmmakers like Marlon Wayans and Jordan Peele, while Alex compares Araki’s visual flair to modern absurdist films like Boys Go to Jupiter.Justin breaks down the movie’s striking use of lighting and color gels—reds, greens, and purples that make every frame look like a fever dream. Arnold reflects on how The Doom Generation feels like Natural Born Killers with way more sex and chaos, while Donnie praises the raw, DIY energy and gives it a solid 4.5/5 on Letterboxd.The crew wraps by asking: could a movie this horny, this violent, this unapologetically weird ever get made today? Maybe not—and that’s exactly why it still matters.Join our Discord!Follow us across all social media:Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)discuss the film’s queer undercurrents—Araki referring to it as , such asJustn - @GhostNerd88Alex - @dailydaresDonnie - @_donnieappleseedArnold - @arniecallegoCheck out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs, and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com* YouTube* TikTok * Facebook* Twitch