Claim OwnershipThe AMI Podcast
Subscribed: 18Played: 412
Subscribe
© Al-Mahdi Institute
Description
AMI Podcasts explore a range of different topics including the latest cutting-edge research within the field of Islamic Studies, book reviews by prominent authors and academics, and discussions among scholars of diverse faiths and denominations within Islam.
225 Episodes
Reverse
A scholarly discussion on The Status of Yazid's Leadership & Imam Hussain's Stance Against Him.
Shaykh Ladak outlined the Shia stance on Yazid and Imam al-Hussain’s rising, and that the Shia hold Yazid directly accountable for the killing of al-Hussain. He outlined the Shia theological stance towards Yazid’s status in the hereafter and justifications for why it is permitted to curse him. The practice of cursing, according to Shaykh Jafar, is a positive means of staying away from sins and should not be taken as something negative.
Dr Qadhi outlined the spectrum of Sunni opinions regarding Yazid’s Khilāfa & his personality, mentioning the mainstream views and the extreme positions held by Sunni Scholars. All Sunni scholars according to him condemn the killing of Imam al-Hussain, although some may not necessarily hold Yazid as being accountable for his death... (Video part 1 of 3).
The Khilafa of Imam Hassan and his abdication to Muawiya, interesting and informative Shia Sunni Panel Discussion.
The Khilafa of Imam Hassan and his abdication to Muawiya from the Sunni View presented by Shaykh Atabek Shukurov.
The Khilafa of Imam Hassan and his abdication to Muawiya from the Shia View presented by Dr. Seyfeddin Kara.
Understanding the stand of Imam Ali and those who opposed him at the battle of Siffin. Shia Sunni scholars discuss various points of view. The discussion prompted further questions around the topic of Khaṭaʾ Ijtihadī (mistakes in interpretation); a notion which would see the wrongs of the companions reduced to a mere error in their judgement, whilst them still being considered worthy of reward due to their effort in the issue. This naturally led to the discussion as to whether Muawiya could be considered a rebel (bāghi), something considered a grave sin by some Muslim jurists, to which the Sunni ulema in the discussion agreed that he, and for that matter, anyone who revolted against Ali, would fall into the category of a rebel. The reverence of Muawiya amongst Sunnis was also discussed, to which some Sunni scholars present made the claim that this is a modern influence of Nasibis on the Sunni community. Syed Fadlallah wrapped up the discussion quoting Quranic verses 2:134 and 12:111, which highlight the importance of taking lessons from such events in history as opposed to it merely being a point of difference. (Part 3 of 3 videos)
Understanding the stand of Imam Ali and those who opposed him at the battle of Siffin. Shia view presentation by Dr Sayyid Jaafar Fadlallah. Syed Fadlallah presented a summary of his detailed Arabic paper on the topic. He broached the subject by looking at historical sources to deduce the motives held by Ali and Muawiya leading up to the battle. These motives are important in trying to figure out which side was in line with Islamic values. He also briefly outlined the approaches that influence one’s reading of this and for that matter any historical event. (Part 2 of 3 videos)
Understanding the stand of Imam Ali and those who opposed him at the battle of Siffin. Sunni view presentation by Syed Naveed Shah. Syed Naveed’s presentation, which was a historical account of the events, outlined the events leading up to and including the battle of Siffin from Sunni sources. From his reading of these historical accounts, he concluded that Ali was appointed as caliph in a rightful manner and that Muawiya’s uprising against him was unjustified. (Part 1 of 3 videos)
Shaykh Arif Abdulhussain, who after acknowledging that this was a sensitive and polarising event for the Muslims, went on to ask whether it was befitting for Lady Aisha to rise up and in the process oppose the Qur’anic commands[3], in addition to rising up against a legitimate caliph. During the discussion, further questions were also raised such as whether those who rose up were considered rebels (baghi) to which Qari Zahiruddin outlined a Sunni stance that during the battle they were considered rebels, however after the battle they repented and were thus exonerated from being considered rebels. In addition to this, the question was raised as to why the fighters against the first two caliphs were considered abandoning the religion (murtad) whilst the fighters against Ali were let off so easily? Also mentioned during the discussion was how this political incident has led to theological implications, and how the Sunni may have to reconcile the notion of the companions being just & right (Adool) whilst them fighting each other? It was concluded that the event did cause tensions in the community, however, the actions of Ali ibn Abi Talib in dealing with Lady Aisha showed that he did so with utmost respect despite the far-reaching consequences of her actions. This is a learning point for us in emulating his character and learning from history.
CIMS Presentation on the Shia perspective by Prof. Liyakat Takim on the Battle of Jamal. Professor Takim briefly recapped the historical narrative, outlined by Qari Zahiruddin, confirming that these details were largely agreed upon by both Shia and Sunni. He then went on to mention certain points raised by Shia scholars such as Lady Aisha’s attack on Basra, which resulted in many lives being lost, despite the killers of Uthman being in Medina and not in Basra. Furthermore, he mentioned the incident of the dogs barking at a place called Hawab, at which point Lady Aisha wanted to turn back as she remembered the Prophet warning his wives of the barking dogs of Hawab. However, members from her army came together and bore witness that the place they were at was not Hawab, to which some Shia scholars point out that this was a mass false testimony if not the first one in Muslim history. The battle of Jamal was a dark time for the Muslim community and it is at this point in history according to Prof. Takim that a concretised notion of identity formed in the community where the label of either a follower of Ali or a follower of Uthman came into existence. (Part 2 of 3)
CIMS Presentation on the Sunni perspective by Qari Zahirrudin Tahir at the Battle of Jamal. Quoting early historical historians such as al-Tabari, al-Baladhuri and others, Qari Zahiruddin outlined the events after the death of Uthman, the reluctance of Ali to take the office of the caliphate, and his subsequent taking of office due to insistence by the people. Despite initially giving allegiance, Talha and Zubair defected and ended up joining Lady Aisha to muster an army rallying in the name of avenging Uthman’s blood. After outlining the events leading up to the battle of Jamal, Qari went on to describe the specifics of the battle which included the retreat of Talha & Zubayr out of remorse, and their subsequent killings. The battle was eventually won by Ali, after which he sent off Lady Aisha back to Medina with dignity and respect. Citing narrations in Sunni hadith books such as Bukhari, and referencing Sunni Scholar’s views such as Shaykh Albani, Qari mentioned that Lady Aisha was in error, however, she was remorseful and repented, and this is testified by her unwillingness to be buried next to the Prophet, in addition to her silence during the remainder of her life in respect to any opposition to Imam Ali. (Part 1 of 3)
CIMS Panel discussion on The Door of Fatima: The controversy over the violation of the House of Sayyeda Fatima (as) by companions, after the death of the Prophet Muhammad (s).
CIMS Presentation on the Sunni perspective by Shaykh Umar Ramadhan on The Door of Fatima: The controversy over the violation of the House of Sayyeda Fatima (as) by companions, after the death of the Prophet Muhammad (s). (Part 2 of 3)
CIMS presentation on Shia perspective by Shaykh Vinay Khetia on 'The Door of Fatima: The controversy over the violation of the House of Sayyeda Fatima (as) by companions, after the death of the Prophet Muhammad (s)'. (Part 1 of 3)
Q&A and Shia Sunni panel discussion on the topic of the relationship between Lady Fatima al-Zahra and the Khulafa after the death of the Prophet in light of the dispute over Fadak. (Part 3 of 3)
Shia presentation by Shaykh Kumail Rajani on the relationship between Fatima al-Zahra and the Khulafa after the death of the Prophet in light of the dispute over Fadak. (Part 2 of 3)
Sunni presentation by Maulana Abdul Hamid Kusuri on the relationship between Lady Fatima al-Zahra and the Khulafa after the death of the Prophet in light of the dispute over Fadak. (Part 1 of 3)
Early Islamic History, Saqifa and the Appointment of the First Caliph Abubakr, Shia Sunni panel discussion and Q&A. (Part 3 of 3 videos)
Early Islamic History, Saqifa and the Appointment of the First Caliph Abubakr, Shia view presentation by Syed Hadi Rizvi. (Part 2 of 3 videos)
Comments
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
United States