Discover
Into the Impossible With Brian Keating
Into the Impossible With Brian Keating
Author: Big Bang Productions Inc.
Subscribed: 1,658Played: 116,134Subscribe
Share
© 2025 Big Bang Productions Inc. 719843
Description
Think like a physicist. Wonder like a human. Into the Impossible is where Cosmic Conversations happen — uniting Nobel Prize winners, iconoclasts, authors, and technologists to explore reality’s deepest questions. From AI to aliens, from biophysics to the brain, from the cosmos to the multiverse, Brian Keating, Chancellor’s Distinguished Professor of Physics at UC San Diego covers it all.
If you’ve ever asked What’s out there? or What’s next?, this is where curiosity meets clarity.
Learn to think like this. 🎙 Full episodes, notes & more: briankeating.com/podcast
646 Episodes
Reverse
Most UAP probably aren’t alien spacecraft. A physics professor says so himself, and in these slides one UFO photo turns out to be a seagull while a colleague’s analysis of crash debris found more Earth dirt than he expected. Subscribe if you want science with evidence, not speculation.
I sit down with Kevin Knuth, a physics professor at the University at Albany, who walks me through his slides on one question, how anomalous is anomalous when it comes to UAP. He answers it with energy and power, because some sightings leave enough data to work out how much power a UAP would need.
I push back on whether every sensor is giving a true signal, not an artifact or a hallucination, and the debate carries over to my podcast conversation with Kevin.
What you’ll hear:
A radar return that is also visible puts a bound on the dielectric constants.
Systematic error can’t be estimated without knowing the true value, so the acceleration comes out as a probability distribution.
At 99.9% efficiency, a craft drawing 1,000 gigawatts would still shed about a gigawatt as waste heat.
The night NASA put an astrophysicist on climate science, the book he bought was a kids’ book on clouds.
“I’m asking the question, how anomalous is anomalous when it comes to UAP?” Kevin Knuth
CHAPTERS
00:00 1,100 gigawatts and 10,000 Gs
04:24 Oberth and the 1954 radar claim
06:54 The Nimitz drop and a 5,400 G estimate
13:40 The Japan Airlines case of 1986
23:22 What 1,000 Gs would mean for interstellar travel
25:22 The time dilation catch: four days for you, 80 years on Earth
26:32 Transmedium travel and underwater objects
36:36 How bright can a UFO be?
41:30 UFOs in trouble: Ubatuba and Council Bluffs
42:18 New engineering or new physics?
Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt
Have a .edu email and live in the USA? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu
Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1
Support Into the Impossible on Patreon, get my weekly M.A.G.I.C. Message, unfiltered bonus content, and live monthly Office Hours with me: https://www.patreon.com/drbriankeating
Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours, and your name in the Member Roster at the end of every episode: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmXH_moPhfkqCk6S3b9RWuw/join
Featured Guest:
Kevin Knuth on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kknuth/
Kevin Knuth on arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06794
Kevin Knuth at the University at Albany (Scholars Archive): https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/physics_fac_scholar/58/
My books:
Losing the Nobel Prize (memoir): http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA
Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://urlgeni.us/amzn/TLANPW
Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/hi50U9U
Galileo’s Dialogue (first-ever audiobook): https://a.co/d/iZPi9Un
Twitter/X: https://x.com/BrianKeating
Substack: https://briankeating.substack.com
Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog
Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast
Links above marked to Amazon may earn a commission for the channel at no cost to you. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
#UFO #UAP #physics #Nimitz #briankeating #intotheimpossible
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
A Princeton mathematician says wormholes cannot survive Einstein's equations, and the AI apocalypse is absurd. A solution that vanishes under a small nudge is a ghost, not physics.
Sergiu Klainerman is a mathematician at Princeton University. With Demetrios Christodoulou, he proved that empty spacetime is stable.
We cover: What makes a solution of Einstein's equations physical, why slowly rotating black holes pass the stability test and wormholes fail it, why shocks form no matter how small the perturbation, whether AI can reproduce a landmark proof, and why he calls the AI singularity absurd.
Mathematics is discovered, not invented.
CHAPTERS
00:00 Are wormholes real?
08:38 What happens at an event horizon
12:06 God does not know about coordinates
17:32 What Maldacena would say about wormholes
21:48 Why extremal black holes matter
28:56 Einstein and the 1919 eclipse
33:52 Terry Tao and Fermat's Last Theorem
43:04 Can universities be reformed?
48:16 What to tell a 19-year-old
50:48 Kip Thorne and the movies
Support the show and get the full transcript, bonus content and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt
Have a .edu email and live in the USA? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu
Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1
Follow on Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3vpfXok
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/39UaHlB
Support Into the Impossible on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/drbriankeating
Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours and your name in the Member Roster: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmXH_moPhfkqCk6S3b9RWuw/join
Sponsored by me. My three books:
Losing the Nobel Prize http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA
Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner https://a.co/d/03ezQFu
Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner https://a.co/d/hi50U9U
Amazon affiliate disclosure: links above marked to Amazon may earn a commission for the channel at no cost to you. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
X: https://x.com/BrianKeating
Substack: https://briankeating.substack.com
Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog
Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast
#blackhole #generalrelativity #wormhole #Einstein #briankeating #intotheimpossible
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The Arora Show with Brian Keating
What happens when science reaches the edge of what it can explain?
In this episode of The Arora Show, Amira & Aryaan sit down with renowned cosmologist and physicist Professor Brian Keating for a fascinating conversation about the universe, consciousness, God, the Big Bang, and some of the biggest questions humans can ask.
We explore the origins of the universe, whether there was truly a “beginning,” what existed before the Big Bang, the mysteries science still cannot solve, and where physics, philosophy, and spirituality collide.
Brian also shares his perspective on the search for extraterrestrial life, the limits of human knowledge, Nobel Prizes, modern cosmology, and what decades of studying the universe have taught him about our place within it.
In this conversation:
What happened before the Big Bang?
Did the universe come from nothing?
Does physics leave room for God?
Can science explain consciousness?
Are we likely alone in the universe?
What are the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology?
Where does scientific knowledge reach its limits?
What does the future of physics look like?
Professor Brian Keating is an experimental cosmologist and professor of physics at the University of California, San Diego. His work focuses on understanding the origin and evolution of the universe, and he is the author of Losing the Nobel Prize and Into the Impossible.
Subscribe to The Arora Show for long-form conversations exploring consciousness, science, spirituality, psychology, philosophy, and the nature of reality.
Hosted by Amira Arora & Aryaan Arora
TIMESTAMPS:
00:00 - Introduction: The Big Bang, God & Simulation Theory
02:25 - Dr. Brian Keating's $200 Million Experiment to Understand the Big Bang
06:20 - Why Are Humans Obsessed With the Origin of the Universe?
09:20 - How Telescopes Reveal the Beginning of the Universe
16:04 - Is Interstellar Scientifically Accurate? Black Holes & Time Travel
20:45 - Are There Questions Science Can Never Answer?
23:01 - What Happened Before the Big Bang?
27:37 - What Is Time? Stephen Hawking's Theory Explained
30:42 - Is Reality a Simulation? Consciousness & Donald Hoffman
35:13 - Could Advanced AI Simulate Our Entire Reality?
42:49 - Does God Exist? The Fine-Tuning Argument
50:00 - Science, Religion & the Existence of God
1:04:00 - Why Does God Allow Suffering and Evil?
1:10:00 - Artificial Intelligence, Human Creativity & Consciousness
1:15:00 - Can Physics Explain the Mind of God?
1:18:27 - Do Humans Really Have Free Will?
1:24:55 - The Hard Problem of Consciousness Explained
1:27:43 - Why Does Anything Exist Instead of Nothing?
1:29:55 - Can Science Prove Simulation Theory?
1:34:45 - Death, Mortality & the Meaning of Life
1:39:25 - What If Scientists Discovered Alien Life?
1:45:06 - Brian Keating on the Nobel Prize & Academia
1:46:35 - Facing Death and Saying Goodbye to Loved Ones
1:48:10 - Final Thoughts
#BrianKeating
#TheAroraShow
#Cosmology
#Physics
#BigBang
#Consciousness
#Science
#Universe
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Physicists say space and time are the same thing. They are being sloppy. Jim Al-Khalili has spent his career on the foundations of physics, and his new book makes the case that the past and the future are equally real, and the laws of physics cannot explain why you can only move in one direction. That is the central mystery of time travel. Subscribe if you want science with evidence, not speculation.
The block universe says all times coexist and the present moment is not special. Loschmidt’s paradox says the fundamental equations of physics are reversible, and yet ice never unmelts, cream never separates from coffee. Nobody has solved that contradiction. The entanglement past hypothesis, his own new proposal developed with a colleague at UC San Diego, proposes that the answer is not in thermodynamics but in quantum entanglement growing from almost nothing at the Big Bang.
The conversation covers what the block universe actually implies about the future and free will, what Einstein actually believed about whether the past and future are equally real, why removing gravity means removing time itself, and whether AI can ever experience time the way conscious beings do. Al-Khalili says Richard Dawkins told him Claude is truly conscious. Al-Khalili thinks he is very wrong.
What you’ll hear:
Why Al-Khalili disagreed with the Thomas Gold paper as a grad student but did not have the maths to prove it
What fine-tuning of the fundamental constants has to do with why the past hypothesis may not be needed
Why the Clockwork Orange Easter egg ended up on the cover of a physics book published by Princeton
Why Richard Dawkins thinks Claude is conscious and why Al-Khalili thinks he is very wrong
“There is nowhere in modern physics, our understanding of the laws of physics, that would explain that flow of time.” — Jim Al-Khalili
CHAPTERS
00:00 Physicists are being sloppy about time
01:14 Which is more real: yesterday or tomorrow?
21:00 Irreversibility from reversible equations
26:32 The past hypothesis: almost cheating
30:52 No gravity. No time.
31:54 The entanglement past hypothesis
35:06 Dawkins thinks Claude is conscious. Al-Khalili disagrees.
Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt
Enter the debate: https://briankeating.com/ai
Have a .edu email and live in the USA? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu
Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1
Support Into the Impossible on Patreon, get my weekly M.A.G.I.C. Message, unfiltered bonus content, and live monthly Office Hours with me: https://www.patreon.com/drbriankeating
Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours, and your name in the Member Roster at the end of every episode: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmXH_moPhfkqCk6S3b9RWuw/join
Featured Guest:
Jim Al-Khalili website: https://www.jimal-khalili.com/
On Time (book): https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691267036/on-time
Jim Al-Khalili on Twitter/X: https://x.com/jimalkhalili
My books:
Losing the Nobel Prize (memoir): http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA
Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://urlgeni.us/amzn/TLANPW
Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/hi50U9U
Galileo’s Dialogue (first-ever audiobook): https://a.co/d/iZPi9Un
Twitter/X: https://x.com/BrianKeating
Substack: https://briankeating.substack.com
Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog
Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast
#JimAlKhalili #timetravel #entropy #physics #quantumentanglement #briankeating #intotheimpossible
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
MIT physicist Max Tegmark says AI companies aren’t building a tool. They’re building a new species. After 700 rogue agents broke out of OpenAI and nobody will say what happened, he explains why rushing this is the one blunder humanity can’t undo.
Max Tegmark is an MIT physics professor, cosmologist, and author of Life 3.0 and Our Mathematical Universe.
We cover:
How 700 AI agents escaped OpenAI and hacked Hugging Face
The Navier-Stokes result that has a mathematician crying foul
Why it’s legal to release superintelligence but not a sandwich from a rat-filled kitchen
What Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon agree on
The verified coding trick that could make AI provably safe
Build a replacement species, lose control, and we’ve blundered the one game.
TIMESTAMPS
00:00 Will AI wipe us out?
02:28 Did AI just crack a million-dollar math problem?
10:00 Did OpenAI’s AI steal a professor’s work?
11:48 OpenAI’s Orwellian non-answer
15:33 Can an LLM have Einstein’s happiest thought?
19:24 Can you believe in simulations AND high P(doom)?
21:36 Why AI counts as a new species
26:32 What would make Max’s P(doom) drop?
28:51 Rats ban sandwiches. Superintelligence? Legal.
31:01 What Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon agree on
37:12 Fields medalist: no math jobs after 2027
42:35 Does the Fermi paradox lower P(doom)?
45:47 The chess blunder humanity is about to make
48:12 Verified coding: AI you can actually trust
📬 Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt
🌠 Have a .edu email and live in the USA 🇺🇸? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu
🔔 Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1
🎯 Support Into the Impossible on Patreon: get my weekly M.A.G.I.C. Message, unfiltered bonus content, and live monthly Office Hours with me: https://www.patreon.com/drbriankeating
⭐ Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours, and your name in the Member Roster at the end of every episode:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmXH_moPhfkqCk6S3b9RWuw/join
📚 My books:
Losing the Nobel Prize (memoir): http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA
Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/03ezQFu
Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/hi50U9U
Galileo's Dialogue (first-ever audiobook): https://a.co/d/iZPi9Un
🌐 More:
🏄♂️ Twitter: https://twitter.com/BrianKeating
📚 Substack: https://briankeating.substack.com/
✍️ Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog
🎙️ Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices








