Discover
InsTech - insurance & innovation with Matthew Grant & Robin Merttens
InsTech - insurance & innovation with Matthew Grant & Robin Merttens
Author: InsTech
Subscribed: 123Played: 6,327Subscribe
Share
© Copyright 2022. All rights reserved. 377913
Description
A weekly interview hosted by Matthew Grant peeking behind the curtain of what‘s going on with some of the most well know companies - and some the newest - from in and around insurance, technology, data and investment.
390 Episodes
Reverse
What actually makes automated and enhanced underwriting work in practice?
In this episode, three early movers in automated underwriting share hard-earned lessons from building digital underwriting propositions that have survived real market cycles. Rather than theory or hype, this conversation digs into where technology genuinely creates advantage, where it does not, and how underwriting judgement remains central even in highly algorithmic models.
Drawing on experience across cyber, US property and digital facilities, the panel explores why complexity, not commoditisation, is often where automation delivers the greatest edge. From AI-driven cyber underwriting to high-cat surplus lines property and digitally distributed specialty products, each speaker explains how they chose their focus and what they learned along the way.
Key themes include the role of data discipline in sustaining AI-led underwriting, why platform design matters more than speed to market, and how underwriters’ roles are shifting from generalists to specialists embedded in algorithmic decision making. The discussion also tackles unstructured data, submission quality and why “no data, no deal” may become a defining principle of future underwriting models.
What you’ll learn in this episode:
Why complex risks can be better suited to automated and augmented underwriting than simple, commoditised ones
How AI and machine learning are being applied in live underwriting decisions, not just analytics
The importance of volume, homogeneity and risk differentiation when building algorithmic models
Lessons from re-platforming early digital products and avoiding long-term technical debt
How generative AI is changing data cleaning, exposure management and submission handling
What enhanced underwriting means for underwriter skills, careers and decision making
Featuring perspectives from Marek Shafer of Vave, Tom Squires of AEGIS London and Jonathan Spry of Envelop Risk, moderated by Matthew Grant of InsTech.
You can also watch the video version of this panel here.
If you like what you’re hearing, please leave us a review on whichever platform you use or contact Matthew Grant on LinkedIn.
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
What happens when AI meets the backbone of the insurance industry - policy administration systems? In this episode, Liselotte Munk, CEO of Fadata, joins Robin Merttens to unpack how artificial intelligence is reshaping the software layer of insurance.
With candid insights into Fadata’s AI strategy, Liselotte reveals how the company is using AI to accelerate software development and reduce implementation costs while improving quality. She tackles the big question: will AI make policy admin systems obsolete? Her answer offers a pragmatic view on cost, complexity, compliance and collaboration.
In this conversation, Liselotte shares:
How AI is already streamlining configuration, documentation and testing in core systems
Why the true opportunity lies in faster implementations and reduced transformation costs
How the role of developers is shifting, and what this means for insurance talent
Why insurers should invest in AI to enhance - not replace - their core platforms
What the smartest insurers are doing now to future-proof operations in an AI-first world
If you like what you’re hearing, please leave us a review on whichever platform you use or contact Robin Merttens on LinkedIn.
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
In this episode, Robin Merttens is joined by Tobi Schneider, Sector Engagement Lead for Financial Services & FinTech at the Edinburgh Futures Institute, to unpack one of the most ambitious research initiatives currently shaping the future of AI risk in insurance. Backed by UKRI and developed in collaboration with AXA Group and three leading universities, the project aims to build a foundational blueprint for how insurers can understand, audit and underwrite emerging AI risks.
Tobi shares why the shift from traditional to generative and agentic AI has outpaced current risk frameworks, leaving insurers exposed to risks that are poorly defined, difficult to monitor and impossible to price using historic loss data. He explains how his team is exploring dynamic underwriting models, parametric solutions and novel assurance techniques like LLM-based judges and automated red teaming, all with the goal of enabling safer, more accountable AI adoption.
Ahead of the Agentic AI Half Day event, hosted in collaboration with AI Risk, Tobi Schneider and Lukasz Szpruch wrote an article The New Frontier: Managing and insuring generative and agentic AI risks, further exploring this topic.
In this conversation, Tobi shares:
Why AI systems that function “correctly” can still produce harmful or costly outcomes
How traditional insurance models fail in the face of opacity, model drift and dynamic learning
What makes AI risk so difficult to price and how parametric triggers can help bridge the gap
Why better assurance leads to better insurance, and how incentives can drive safer AI deployment
How continuous monitoring tools are being developed to audit AI models in real time
What today’s early AI insurance offerings (from the likes of Munich Re and Relm) are actually covering
The role of non-profit research in supporting commercial innovation without commercial bias
What insurers can do now to prepare for an AI-driven future even without historical data
If you like what you’re hearing, please leave us a review on whichever platform you use or contact Robin Merttens on LinkedIn.
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
This week we bring you an episode of Bootstrap Confidential featuring InsTech’s very own CEO, Matthew Grant, who joined Charles Green in the latter half of 2025 to reflect on the eight-year journey of building InsTech from the ground up without outside funding, and with an intentional focus on sustainable growth.
Matthew’s route to growing InsTech wasn’t typical. With a background in risk, analytics and around 400 podcast episodes as a host, he brought a deep understanding of the insurance sector and what it takes to build a commercially viable, insight-led business. The result? A thriving community of over 30,000, a high-margin membership model and a successful exit achieved through discipline, focus and clear-eyed decisions.
In this conversation, Matthew shares:
Why he sees bootstrapping as risk management, not risk taking
The importance of paying yourself from day one and how that shaped InsTech’s trajectory
Lessons from testing (and killing) products that didn’t deliver
Why hiring curious, early-career talent paid off
What most founders get wrong about option schemes and equity
How to handle financial stress without losing your team or your sanity
Why co-founders matter and why investors aren’t a substitute
The hard truth about building the business your customers want, not just the one you’d love to run
If you like what you’re hearing, please leave us a review on whichever platform you use or contact Matthew Grant on LinkedIn.
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
In this episode, Robin Merttens is joined by Andy Yeoman, CEO of Concirrus, to unpack how a key player in marine insurance tech has reinvented itself as a core platform provider for the specialty market, and what that transformation says about where the industry is heading.
Andy shares the thinking behind Concirrus’ pivot from ship tracking to full risk lifecycle processing, what it takes to build end-to-end technology in just 18 months, and why underwriters, not just CTOs, are now leading the charge on system change.
In this conversation, Andy shares:
Why marine was just the beginning and why modern platforms must serve multiple lines with depth, not just breadth
What today’s insurers really want from core systems: speed, interoperability and business outcomes
How Concirrus became an AI-first company and what that’s meant for product delivery, talent and culture
The rise of the tech-fuelled MGA and why they’re now the “risk entrepreneurs” to watch
How verticalised platforms are winning over underwriters by solving for class-specific nuance
What the shift from admin-heavy roles to empowered underwriting means for job satisfaction and talent retention
Why managing change is as important as building tech and what Concirrus learned from its own internal AI adoption
What’s next for insurance infrastructure as constraints fall away and innovation accelerates
If you like what you’re hearing, please leave us a review on whichever platform you use or contact Robin Merttens on LinkedIn.
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
How can AI weather models improve the accuracy and scale of catastrophe modelling?
Matthew Grant is joined by David Wood, Managing Director at JBA Risk Management, and Jochen Papenbrock, Head of Financial Technology (EMEA) at NVIDIA, to explore how accelerated computing is unlocking new ways to simulate and manage flood risk.
JBA has long been a pioneer in flood modelling, while NVIDIA’s GPU technology has helped drive the recent breakthroughs in AI and generative modelling. Together, they discuss how high-resolution simulations, new ensemble methods and open-source tools are pushing the limits of what’s possible in climate and catastrophe analytics.
Key Talking Points:
The early bet – how JBA’s adoption of GPU computing over a decade ago made national-scale flood mapping possible
From gaming to GenAI – how NVIDIA's evolution from graphics to AI led to the development of physics-informed weather models
Ensemble power – why running 1,000+ simulations helps capture more extremes than the historic record ever could
Event sets reimagined – how AI models are enabling richer, more diverse flood scenarios for Europe and beyond
Real-time relevance – the potential to use AI models to simulate how a flood might unfold, as it’s happening
Making AI usable – how Earth-2 Studio and open-source frameworks are opening up generative models to catastrophe modellers
Proving value – how NVIDIA and JBA worked together to quantify the benefits of faster, more flexible modelling approaches
Looking ahead – why cross-sector collaboration will be essential to turn acceleration into real-world impact
If you like what you’re hearing, please leave us a review on whichever platform you use or contact Matthew Grant on LinkedIn.
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
In this episode, Robin Merttens is joined by Dr Thomas Kuhnt (HDI Global SE), Ed Ackerman (Qover) and Vincent De Ponthaud (AXA) for a rare C-suite perspective on Agentic AI — what it is, how it's being deployed and why senior leaders are walking a tightrope between bold innovation and operational risk.
Agentic AI promises transformative value, but for decision-makers at the top, it also brings real uncertainty. What do you build vs. buy? How do you prove ROI? And how do you prevent over-trusting agents that are inherently probabilistic?
In this conversation, Thomas, Ed and Vincent share:
Why Agentic AI is different from past tech trends and why this one feels real
The cultural and leadership challenge of balancing excitement with governance
How AXA and HDI are enabling safe experimentation at scale across complex organisations
How Qover is building 20+ AI agents to automate claims micro-tasks — and when they build vs. buy
What customers really think about AI agents and why nearly none opt out
The risks of shadow AI and why IT needs to move faster than ever
Why “human in the loop” is flawed and how user trust in AI could become a blind spot
What’s missing: industry standards, agent evaluation tools and new roles like “agent managers”
The case for cautious iteration, deep collaboration and constant re-evaluation
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
In this episode, Claire Souch is joined by Tom Philp, CEO of Maximum Information; James Lay, AVP of Product Management at Verisk; and Stephen Martin, Head of Catastrophe Modelling at Westfield Specialty, for a timely discussion on the future of catastrophe model evaluation, and why it's no longer enough to simply trust what’s in the black box.
As new specialist model vendors emerge and market expectations evolve, the panel unpacks a growing demand for transparency, interoperability and smarter ways to adopt models that fit real-world portfolios. At the heart of the conversation is a shared belief: the industry doesn’t just need more models, it needs better ways to evaluate and use them.
In this conversation, they explore:
Why traditional model validation no longer meets the needs of modern risk teams
The shift from 'black box' outputs to meaningful model evaluation that supports business decisions
How tools from Maximum Information and Verisk’s Model Exchange reduce the burden on small or lean teams
The role of Oasis as a framework for opening up access across multiple model vendors
Why standardisation and open data formats are essential for meaningful interoperability
The growing role of niche vendors in reshaping perceptions of model transparency
How automation is changing the regulatory and investor reporting game
Why this is more than a tech upgrade—it's a cultural reset in catastrophe modelling
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
In this episode, Brian Owens is joined by Dana Foley (Head of Catastrophe Research at Chaucer), Joss Matthewman (Chief Revenue Officer at Reask) and Olivia Sloan (Head of Catastrophe Products at Fathom) to explore the growing influence of specialist model vendors in catastrophe risk modelling and why they’re anything but “niche”.
With decades of combined experience across underwriting, model development and scientific research, the panel discusses how climate change, regulatory pressure and the need for portfolio-specific insight are pushing insurers to reconsider single-platform dependency. They explore how new vendors are filling gaps left by traditional models offering science-led, transparent and highly customisable solutions tailored to specific business needs.
Drawing on their respective roles across the risk ecosystem, the panellists explain why the return to multi-modelling is gaining momentum and how platforms like Oasis are helping democratise access to emerging tools.
In this conversation, the panel explores:
Why “niche” models are proving critical in underserved perils, regions and use cases
The evolution from black-box outputs to transparent, collaborative frameworks
How science-first models enable faster innovation and user-driven risk views
What’s enabling and blocking wider adoption of multi-modelling approaches
How Fathom and Reask are using AI and machine learning to improve model fidelity
Why regulatory scrutiny and climate change demand a more agile modelling approach
The role of open platforms like Oasis in supporting innovation and vendor access
What insurers need to consider when building a tailored, future-ready modelling strategy
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
Introduction
In this episode, Robin Merttens is joined by Jack Miller, CEO and Co-founder of nettle, to explore how generative AI is being applied to one of insurance’s most complex and resource-constrained challenges: risk engineering. Jack shares how his work at McKinsey, leading AI transformations for insurers, exposed him to the inefficiencies in assessing commercial property risks and how that inspired Nettle’s founding.
From mass retirements of risk engineers to the reality that most properties are never physically assessed, Jack outlines why the status quo is unsustainable and how AI can help underwriters make faster, more informed decisions without sacrificing depth or judgement. He explains how nettle is already working with insurers like Allianz to roll out configurable, production-ready tools that reduce manual burden, unlock previously inaccessible insights and integrate directly into existing underwriting platforms.
In this conversation, Jack shares:
Why risk engineering is facing a capacity crunch and how that affects underwriting quality
The surprising statistic that sparked nettle’s creation: 97.5% of properties are never visited
How generative AI can enhance, not replace, expert judgement in high-value underwriting
Why depth, not breadth, is the key to building meaningful AI solutions in insurance
Lessons from building a product insurers can implement in weeks not years
The importance of involving underwriters in AI adoption from day one
What most insurers get wrong about pilots, procurement and “proper” GenAI strategies
How nettle’s partnership with Allianz helped shape a scalable, enterprise-ready product
Why commercial P&C is the perfect proving ground for next-generation InsurTech
If you like what you’re hearing, please leave us a review on whichever platform you use or contact Jack Miller or Robin Merttens on LinkedIn.
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
In this episode, Richard Gunn, President & CRO at hyperexponential, joins host Matthew Grant to share the inside story of hyperexponential's expansion journey from the UK to the US, and how the company is reshaping pricing and underwriting in the insurance sector.
Richard reflects on seven years at hyperexponential, starting as the first non-engineering hire to now leading a fast-growing US team in New York. He explains how hyperexponential has evolved from a pricing platform into a broader decision infrastructure provider, with tools spanning triage, portfolio intelligence and AI-powered underwriting support.
In this conversation, Richard shares:
Why hx's "pro-code" platform sits between build vs buy, offering flexibility without compromising enterprise-grade credibility
How the team landed major US clients before even setting up a US office
The strategic lessons behind building trust with US insurers, from culture to communication
The practical impact of generative AI and "vibe coding" in hx's product development and internal operations
Why hx believes AI isn't about replacing roles but redrawing their boundaries to boost effectiveness
What it's like to move across the Atlantic with a young family while scaling a tech business
How New York's transient tech culture supports rapid networking and hiring
His predictions on shifting insurer priorities from growth to profitability
Resources & Mentions:
AI Daily Brief (podcast recommendation)
Book: Papillon by Henri Charrière
Previous guests: Amrit (hyperexponential Co-founder & CEO), Marcus Ryu (Co-founder and Chairman at Guidewire and Partner at Battery Ventures)
If you like what you’re hearing, please leave us a review on whichever platform you use or contact Richard Gunn or Matthew Grant on LinkedIn.
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
In this episode, Robin Merttens is joined by Tim Hardcastle, CEO and Co-founder of INSTANDA, to reflect on what it takes to turn a contrarian vision into a global insurtech platform and what the next decade of innovation might look like.
Tim left a senior role at Hiscox to build a no-code platform for insurers at a time when most said it couldn’t be done. Ten years on, INSTANDA powers operations around the world and is gearing up for its next big leap. This conversation revisits the early sparks of that journey, including a memorable chat at the Royal Exchange, and dives into the personal and professional lessons Tim has gathered along the way.
In this conversation, Tim shares:
Why the earliest versions of INSTANDA were built despite zero market demand
How a falling out with a boss became the unexpected catalyst for entrepreneurship
The reality of scaling a tech company in insurance including a motorbike sale to make payroll
Why belief, timing and architecture were crucial to gaining traction
How humility shaped both leadership style and product design
What it means to lead through survival, scale and reinvention
His view on legacy, moonshot AI and the importance of letting go
What’s fuelling his passion ten years in and where the next decade might lead
This one is part retrospective, part roadmap and full of insight for anyone thinking long-term about change in insurance.
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
Continuing Professional Development
This InsTech Podcast Episode is accredited by the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII). By listening, you can claim up to 0.5 hours towards your CPD scheme.
By the end of this podcast, you should be able to meet the following Learning Objectives:
Describe the early challenges of launching a no-code insurance platform in a sceptical market.
Explain how belief, architecture and timing contributed to INSTANDA’s success and scalability.
Define the role of humility in effective insurtech leadership and product design.
If your organisation is a member of InsTech and you would like to receive a quarterly summary of the CPD hours you have earned, visit the Episode 382 page of the InsTech website or email cpd@instech.co to let us know you have listened to this podcast.
To help us measure the impact of the learning, we would be grateful if you would take a minute to complete a quick feedback survey.
In this episode, Robin Merttens sits down with Haris Khan and Arved Pohlabeln, co-founders of Novee, to unpack what’s broken in specialty underwriting — and how AI is finally in a position to fix it.
Having met as consultants at Deloitte, Haris and Arved kept encountering the same themes: overworked underwriters, inconsistent submissions, and transformation efforts that rarely made a real difference. That frustration turned into action. Today, they’re building Novee — an AI assistant designed specifically for underwriters, combining insight generation with targeted automation.
In this conversation, Haris and Arved share:
Why underwriting processes remain complex, fragmented and hard to standardise
What makes specialty submissions so variable — and why every case feels like an edge case
How Novee delivers value in two ways: by surfacing better risk insights and automating manual tasks
Why underwriters are embracing AI tools now — not resisting them
What it takes to get live in weeks, not months, with meaningful value
The real-world impact of extracting information from unstructured submissions
How they raised £1.6 million in seed funding and what they’re doing with it
Why verticalised AI is outperforming generic solutions in insurance
What it means to redesign underwriting interaction patterns — and why inbox to insight is the future
The case for using AI before you fix your data, not after
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
Continuing Professional Development
This InsTech Podcast Episode is accredited by the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII). By listening, you can claim up to 0.5 hours towards your CPD scheme.
By the end of this podcast, you should be able to meet the following Learning Objectives:
Describe the real-world challenges underwriters face when working with inconsistent, unstructured submissions.
Define the concept of verticalised AI in the context of specialty underwriting and how it differs from generic AI solutions.
List the specific ways Novee supports underwriters through both insight delivery and task automation.
If your organisation is a member of InsTech and you would like to receive a quarterly summary of the CPD hours you have earned, visit the Episode 381 page of the InsTech website or email cpd@instech.co to let us know you have listened to this podcast.
To help us measure the impact of the learning, we would be grateful if you would take a minute to complete a quick feedback survey.
In this episode, Matthew Grant sits down with Jonathan Rake, CEO of Risk Data Solutions at Swiss Re, to explore how a major reinsurer is building data and analytics as core capabilities beyond traditional risk‑transfer. Jonathan explains why the shift matters, how analytics are being embedded in real‑time workflows, and what insurers and corporates should focus on as risk becomes more interconnected and dynamic.
In this conversation, Jonathan shares:
Why Swiss Re launched Risk Data Solutions and how it leverages internal analytics for client value
How “certainty of insight” and real‑time decision‑making are redefining insurance workflows
The differing risk‑analysis needs of large corporates versus insurers, and what each must prioritise
How Swiss Re approaches partnerships: enabling versus enriching, and why you cannot go it alone
The acquisition of Fathom (UK) and how model‑blending is raising the accuracy bar in catastrophe modelling
His approach to leadership, maintaining balance outside work and keeping pace with change
A bold prediction for 2026 — and the book he recommends to anyone interested in adventure, risk and innovation 'A Voyage for Madmen' by Peter Nichols
If you like what you’re hearing, please leave us a review on whichever platform you use or contact Jonathan Rake or Matthew Grant on LinkedIn.
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
Continuing Professional Development
This InsTech Podcast Episode is accredited by the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII). By listening, you can claim up to 0.5 hours towards your CPD scheme.
By the end of this podcast, you should be able to meet the following Learning Objectives:
Specify the tools and workflows that allow insurers to consume insights directly within underwriting platforms.
Measure the business case for embedding analytics in risk workflows versus maintaining separate data functions.
Produce a clearer understanding of how large insurers are operationalising resilience through data, modelling and partnerships.
If your organisation is a member of InsTech and you would like to receive a quarterly summary of the CPD hours you have earned, visit the Episode 380 page of the InsTech website or email cpd@instech.co to let us know you have listened to this podcast.
To help us measure the impact of the learning, we would be grateful if you would take a minute to complete a quick feedback survey.
Catastrophe models have come a long way - but are decision-makers keeping up?
In this panel from InsTech’s The future of catastrophe risk: where science meets reality, Alice Kaye (Inigo), Caroline McMullan (Verisk) and host Dickie Whitaker (Oasis LMF) confront the challenges of turning sophisticated risk models into clear, actionable decisions.
Together, they explore why uncertainty is often more valuable than the average, how human biases still cloud our understanding of extreme events, and what’s needed to close the communication gap between modellers, underwriters and boards. This conversation gets real about the behavioural, structural and cultural shifts the insurance industry must make to better navigate risk in an increasingly volatile world.
What you'll learn in this episode:
Why point estimates often mislead decision-makers - and how scenarios can bring data to life
The role of behavioural bias in catastrophe risk assessment (think hindsight, anchoring and mean reversion)
How leading insurers like Inigo are integrating model outputs into daily underwriting and board-level strategy
The importance of early-career training to build confidence in managing uncertainty
How the interface between climate science, data science and vulnerability modelling is evolving
Why pre-competitive collaboration with academia is critical for the industry's future
If you like what you’re hearing, please leave us a review on whichever platform you use or contact Matthew Grant on LinkedIn.
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
Continuing Professional Development
This InsTech Podcast Episode is accredited by the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII). By listening, you can claim up to 0.5 hours towards your CPD scheme.
By the end of this podcast, you should be able to meet the following Learning Objectives:
Identify gaps in skills and training that hinder effective risk modelling and decision-making.
Produce more informed underwriting decisions by integrating multiple views of risk.
Summarise best practices for bridging the gap between research, modelling and commercial application.
If your organisation is a member of InsTech and you would like to receive a quarterly summary of the CPD hours you have earned, visit the Episode 379 page of the InsTech website or email cpd@instech.co to let us know you have listened to this podcast.
To help us measure the impact of the learning, we would be grateful if you would take a minute to complete a quick feedback survey.
In this special episode of the podcast, originally hosted by Indico Data’s Unstructured Unlocked, Matthew Grant, CEO of InsTech, joins Tom Wilde and Michelle Gouveia to discuss how insurers are harnessing third-party data and AI to make more informed, efficient underwriting decisions.
With over 25 years in catastrophe modelling and analytics, Matthew shares his view on where the real innovation is happening and where insurers are still facing friction. From the rising value of external data sources to the operational impact of generative AI, the conversation is packed with insights that go beyond the buzzwords.
InsTech is sharing this episode to highlight the practical challenges and opportunities facing carriers and reinsurers as they modernise their approach to risk.
What you’ll learn
Why many insurers still struggle to access the most basic risk data
What third-party data needs to prove before it’s trusted in underwriting
How AI is changing both the speed and depth of catastrophe modelling
When it makes sense for carriers to build proprietary models—and when it doesn’t
What reinsurers have taught the market about effective model use
The quiet power of improving underwriting efficiency, not just accuracy
How better data and analytics can help insurers write more risk with more confidence
If you like what you’re hearing, please leave us a review on whichever platform you use or contact Matthew Grant on LinkedIn.
Discover more episodes of Tom Wilde's and Michelle Gouveia's podcast at Indico Data's Unstructured Unlocked.
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
Continuing Professional Development
This InsTech Podcast Episode is accredited by the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII). By listening, you can claim up to 0.5 hours towards your CPD scheme.
By the end of this podcast, you should be able to meet the following Learning Objectives:
Measure the practical value of generative AI in improving underwriting efficiency and catastrophe modelling accuracy.
Specify the thresholds third-party data must meet—cost and confidence—before it can support underwriting decisions.
Explain how insurers are approaching the build vs buy decision when it comes to proprietary AI models.
If your organisation is a member of InsTech and you would like to receive a quarterly summary of the CPD hours you have earned, visit the Episode 378 page of the InsTech website or email cpd@instech.co to let us know you have listened to this podcast.
To help us measure the impact of the learning, we would be grateful if you would take a minute to complete a quick feedback survey.
What are we still missing in catastrophe modelling and how can we close the gap?
As part of InsTech’s The Future of Catastrophe Risk: Where Science Meets Reality event, this expert panel explored the limitations of current catastrophe models and how the insurance industry can evolve its approach to risk.
Hosted by Ludovico Nicotina (Inigo), with insights from Sandra Hansen (Guy Carpenter) and Paul Wilson (Twelve Securis), the discussion focused on where models fall short, how emerging risks are challenging traditional assumptions and what it will take to build more resilient, climate-aware modelling frameworks.
In this conversation, the panel explores:
What current models overlook — from unmodelled sub-perils to social and infrastructure vulnerabilities
How inter-annual clustering and systemic effects drive outsized losses
The tension between increasing model flexibility and responsible use of adaptation features
Whether vendors are providing enough transparency to support custom views of risk
How the industry can better incorporate future climate states into today’s modelling tools
The case for cross-sector collaboration and more open sharing of internal risk perspectives
If you like what you’re hearing, please leave us a review on whichever platform you use or contact Matthew Grant on LinkedIn.
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
Continuing Professional Development
This InsTech Podcast Episode is accredited by the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII). By listening, you can claim up to 0.5 hours towards your CPD scheme.
By the end of this podcast, you should be able to meet the following Learning Objectives:
Identify best practices for using adaptation and resilience features within CAT models responsibly.
Produce informed strategies for interpreting and adjusting model outputs to reflect internal views of risk.
Summarise the practical steps insurers and risk managers can take to bridge the gap between science and real-world application.
If your organisation is a member of InsTech and you would like to receive a quarterly summary of the CPD hours you have earned, visit the Episode 377 page of the InsTech website or email cpd@instech.co to let us know you have listened to this podcast.
To help us measure the impact of the learning, we would be grateful if you would take a minute to complete a quick feedback survey.
In this episode, Robin Merttens is joined by Julian Schoemig, CEO and Co-founder of Diesta, to explore why payments and settlements remain one of the insurance industry’s biggest unsolved problems, and what it will take to fix them.
From his early days selling boxing machines to Munich pubs to underwriting aviation at Munich Re, Julian’s career has been shaped by a single truth: business doesn’t count until the cash is in the bank. That mindset now underpins Diesta, a company building the financial plumbing to help insurers, brokers and MGAs move money with greater clarity, speed and control.
In this conversation, Julian shares:
Why insurance payment flows are so complex — and how that creates systemic risk
What makes insurance different from other industries that rely on intermediated transactions
The scale of the problem: seven times more money moves than is written in premium
How Diesta connects policy systems, banks and documents to create a single source of truth
Why traditional reconciliation tools fall short for insurance finance teams
The real-world impact of unallocated cash, overpayments and delayed settlements
What he's learned from building a product in a “boring but broken” space
Why now is the right time for vertical, API-first infrastructure in insurance
The case for making payments a first-class metric in performance and incentives
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
Continuing Professional Development
This InsTech Podcast Episode is accredited by the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII). By listening, you can claim up to 0.5 hours towards your CPD scheme.
By the end of this podcast, you should be able to meet the following Learning Objectives:
Specify the technological and structural reasons why insurance payment flows are more complex than in other industries.
Explain how Diesta’s payment operations layer integrates with existing systems to streamline cash flow.
Define the concept of a financial subledger in the context of intermediated insurance.
If your organisation is a member of InsTech and you would like to receive a quarterly summary of the CPD hours you have earned, visit the Episode 376 page of the InsTech website or email cpd@instech.co to let us know you have listened to this podcast.
To help us measure the impact of the learning, we would be grateful if you would take a minute to complete a quick feedback survey.
What would happen if the next hurricane wasn’t just stronger but completely off the scale? Are we prepared for a Category 6 event, and would it even show up in our models?
In this panel discussion from InsTech’s July evening event The future of catastrophe risk: where science meets reality, supported by Inigo, Ruth Petrie leads a conversation on how insurers are responding to more extreme, uncertain and fast-changing catastrophe risks.
Featuring:
Emma Watkins, Catastrophe Risk Leader
Chris Weller, Head of Exposure Management, Inigo
Tom Philp, CEO, Maximum Information
Together, they challenge the assumptions behind traditional catastrophe modelling, explore the limits of the Saffir-Simpson scale and ask whether imagination, not just data, will define the future of risk management.
In this conversation, the panel explores:
Whether the industry should move beyond Cat 5 and how we define “extreme” risk
Why flood, surge and rainfall are often more damaging than wind alone
How climate change is altering where and how storms form — and what we can predict
What insurers can (and can’t) do in the face of rapid intensification
Why demand surge, rebuild costs and politics are now central to loss estimation
What kind of event would truly “shake” the insurance market — and why
This is essential listening for exposure managers, underwriters, brokers and risk leaders looking to challenge conventional thinking and prepare for what’s next.
If you like what you’re hearing, please leave us a review on whichever platform you use or contact Matthew Grant on LinkedIn.
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
Continuing Professional Development
This InsTech Podcast Episode is accredited by the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII). By listening, you can claim up to 0.5 hours towards your CPD scheme.
By the end of this podcast, you should be able to meet the following Learning Objectives:
Identify where insurers remain unprepared for rapid intensification and other emerging storm behaviours.
Produce a more complete view of catastrophe exposure by integrating hazard, vulnerability and socio-economic factors.
Summarise the panel’s recommendations for improving risk communication, preparedness and resilience across the industry.
If your organisation is a member of InsTech and you would like to receive a quarterly summary of the CPD hours you have earned, visit the Episode 375 page of the InsTech website or email cpd@instech.co to let us know you have listened to this podcast.
To help us measure the impact of the learning, we would be grateful if you would take a minute to complete a quick feedback survey.
In this episode, Matthew Grant sits down with Matthew Eagle, Head of Global Model Solutions and Advisory at Guy Carpenter, to explore how one of the industry's most respected voices sees the future of modelling, capital management and advisory in reinsurance.
With three decades of experience, Matthew reflects on what’s changed — and what hasn’t — in how reinsurers view risk. From the early days of catastrophe models to today’s generative AI agents and open modelling platforms, he shares how his team is helping insurers manage volatility, optimise capital and drive profitable growth.
In this episode, Matthew shares:
Why flood, wildfire and severe convective storm are the perils to watch — and model — more closely
How generative AI is already reshaping pricing, underwriting and actuarial workflows
What insurers need to know about build vs buy when it comes to new analytics tools
How Guy Carpenter is scaling open-source tech through Oasis and data standardisation
What skills are now essential for new analysts entering the industry
How AI agents are being used to replicate complex actuarial decisions in seconds
Why “good enough” modelling still matters, and where precision can be a false economy
The link between terrorism modelling and gaming engines — and what it signals for future innovation
If you like what you’re hearing, please leave us a review on whichever platform you use or contact Richard Hartley or Matthew Grant on LinkedIn.
Sign up to the InsTech newsletter for a fresh view on the world every Wednesday morning.
Continuing Professional Development
This InsTech Podcast Episode is accredited by the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII). By listening, you can claim up to 0.5 hours towards your CPD scheme.
By the end of this podcast, you should be able to meet the following Learning Objectives:
Define the evolving skill sets required for analysts working in catastrophe risk and capital modelling.
Identify the trade-offs in choosing between ‘build’ and ‘buy’ approaches when adopting new analytical technologies.
Produce a framework for helping clients achieve profitable growth, manage volatility and optimise capital.
If your organisation is a member of InsTech and you would like to receive a quarterly summary of the CPD hours you have earned, visit the Episode 374 page of the InsTech website or email cpd@instech.co to let us know you have listened to this podcast.
To help us measure the impact of the learning, we would be grateful if you would take a minute to complete a quick feedback survey.























