DiscoverAlpha and Omega Ministries
Alpha and Omega Ministries
Claim Ownership

Alpha and Omega Ministries

Author: Dr. James White

Subscribed: 4,442Played: 335,544
Share

Description

Enjoy the newest sermons from Alpha and Omega Ministries in Phoenix, Arizona via our podcast feed.
1172 Episodes
Reverse
As promised, I looked over the "Sacralism on Steroids" graphic put out by the "New Christian Right" putting Donald Trump as Constantine (seriously) and noted the simplistic history that always accompanies these kinds of movements. Then we looked at the variant at 1 Timothy 3:16 as it was addressed by my upcoming debate opponent, Dr. Dustin Smith, in a recent podcast. Today's program has a fair amount of graphical information so audio only folks might be missing out on some things.
We started off the program with the major announcement of the scheduling of a major debate later in 2026 with Craig Truglia on the topic of the veneration of icons and the Seventh Ecumenical Council. I explained why this is a vital topic with greater ramifications than might first suggest themselves. Then we transitioned into some of Matthew Barrett's students converting to Anglicanism and where this might all lead. We will do another program tomorrow, so join us then!
Today we covered two things mainly, the clear division of the United States and its causes and, more to the point, what it will mean for the church in the near future and then we moved to Acts 20 and Paul's comments to the Ephesian elders and what it means to be guilty of men's blood, and what it means to "pervert" or "twist" the truth of God.
Tried to mine some gold from the Talmud at the start of the program, but didn't get any, then talked a good bit about the upcoming Qadhi dialogue and the inane attempts to parallel that with the politically motivated Christless Nationalism interactions with Nick Fuentes. Then we moved on to how quickly people forget history and fall into repeating it, to their own detriment.
First half was talking about new books and video series coming out from the Christless Nationalists, and then moved on to the "New Mormonism" developing up in Utah, a fascinating topic. Join us as we press into 2026!
So on Christmas day Joel Webbon responded to a Christian woman by simply saying "Silence, Jew. It's Christmas." And so began another eruption of the degradation of CNism into just another "it's the Jews" group, with Joel Webbon and Eric Conn leading the parade. Hated to have to take the time to do it, but with Webbon doing a program with Nick Fuentes this weekend, it had to be done. At least we can say we warned people in the past, and sadly, most of those warnings have gone unheeded.
Started off taking a LOT more time than I expected talking about ancient housing arrangements, what a "manger" might be, etc., and then moved on to a rant against Reformed theology and a common argument against God's decree that keeps coming up. Interrupted by a brief power outage at our office, but, I assume Rich will just cut that out. Enjoy!
Really had fun on today's program! Started off with a question I have for a Reformed Baptist minister, and all of his tribe, and the issue of "ecumenical councils," then went to callers. The first, about "Holocaustianity" went too long and went nowhere, but the rest were all thoughtful and really helpful. We have a great audience! I was really encouraged by the quality of the questions and the thinking they exemplified.
I guess I had more stuff from Joel Webbon than I thought I did as I kept running into it as I looked through my bookmarks today and we kept circling back, my apologies! But, after talking about "Holocaustianity" we did get to some Provisionist stuff, though I didn't get that finished up. Will do so next week, I hope. But, coming on Thursday, we will do another Zoom calls episode. See you then!
Touched on the current controversy raging over conditionalism/annihilationism in the first half hour. It is a tough topic, and rarely approached from the perspective that would allow a consistent, and biblical, conclusion. Then we looked at the Immaculate Conception defined 12/8/1854, and some amazing responses to a short post I put up about it just yesterday.
Covered a lot of topics today. Answered three questions from a great apologist up north (not that he needed them!), then dove into stuff on John 6, the use of metaphor, King James Onlyism and Steven Anderson (again!), Redeemed Zoomer, BishopJaxi, and finally, an emotion based "testimony" of conversion to Mormonism and the LDS priesthood. Don't forget to catch clips from the program if you can't listen to the whole thing here!
Did the program live from Pryor, Oklahoma (it's a bit nippy out here!). Covered some truly insane cultural items at the start, and then moved on to responding to @BishopJaxi's attack on sola scriptura on X. Important material for folks wanting to provide sound responses to those seeking a form of the church that Christ never intended us to have.
Covered a bunch of topics from Titus 1:6 and elders to Eastern Orthodoxy and sola scriptura and other topics. Will be doing another program on Wednesday given it is a holiday week, and then I head for Pryor, St. Charles, and elsewhere on Friday!
Open Phones Dividing Line!

Open Phones Dividing Line!

2025-11-2101:15:06

Rich and I were commenting after the show, "Why don't we do this more often? That was great!" Good calls on lots of topics as always. Two were on Reformed Baptists in churches of another denomination (one Lutheran, one PCA). Also calls on the early church writers, Mormonism, etc. Enjoy!
Spent a little longer than I intended to address the "controversy" on line regarding Skillet's great rendition of O Come, O Come Emmanuel, and then moved on to comments made by Matthew Barrett on "conciliar authority" and being a Baptist. Right toward the end we mentioned the new trailer(s) for an upcoming Christian Nationalism documentary and how really dumb it is to say Christianity is "fake and gay."
Had to finally comment on the election of an open communist (I explain how democratic socialists are just communists without guns...yet) in New York City, and what that means for the future. Then I looked at the recent reception of Gio Benitez, an openly "married" homosexual, into the Roman Church, replete with access to the Eucharist, and how even Bishop Strickland raised the issue to the USCCB. Then we responded to Dr. Allen's comments on our challenge to Provisionists, discovering the new "hermeneutic of agnosticism" that they use to try to avoid actually telling us what texts mean (rather than just telling us what they cannot possibly mean).
Looked at some interesting developments in last week's topic of the Papal document on Marian doctrines, and then transitioned into the issue of historical anachronism, and how it is popping up all over the place on the Internet, and no one seems to be able to recognize it. Then we looked at David Allen and the topic of 1 John 5:1, providing a challenge to all Provisionists. Then we discussed the utter meltdown of Sam Shamoun in his attacks on David Wood, and finished up looking at what seems to be a relatively new note the Watchtower has attached to its translation of John 12:41 seeking to keep their followers in the darkness of error.
Yes, I did briefly mention communism rising in the nation, but I kept that short. Focused on reading from the new document from the Vatican, going over its assertions, and then moving on at the very end to a thread with Joshua Charles, a convert to Papalism, on the utter dogmatic necessity of anachronism in how Roman Catholics handle history.
A whole lot of Roman Catholics around the world awoke today to deep disappointment. Not only did the new Papal document, Mater Papuli Fidelis, not define the 5th Marian dogma, it was, evidently, meant to be the stake in the heart of the movement to have that dogma defined. This was quite a shock to many, but in reality, this new document proves once again one fundamental reality: Rome operates on her own authority (sola ecclesia) and does not have access to anything that is truly "Apostolic tradition." We dive into the topic, and the documentation, today on the program, but will need to finish up on Thursday. This is a pretty important discussion of a central and current discussion relating to modern Roman Catholicism.
So the net is abuzz with excited speculation about a doctrinal statement coming from the Vatican next Tuesday about Mary's role in salvation. Millions of Roman Catholics around the world have signed petitions over the past three decades or more requesting the definition of the "Fifth Marian Dogma" that being Mary as Co-Redemptrix, Co-Mediatrix, and Advocate for the people of God. Many are hoping this new document will dogmatize that teaching, though I find that doubtful. We discuss the issue on Reformation Day 2025. Enjoy!
loading
Comments (25)

The Haunted Wood Booger

James white shows his ture colors! Hate Christians and loves Islam! imam White!!

Jan 7th
Reply (1)

The Haunted Wood Booger

Thats false information. its 10 parts free or pay for full interview right away. can't even tell the truth

Jan 3rd
Reply

The Haunted Wood Booger

Such an arrogant cuck!!

Dec 17th
Reply

piglin_gold64

Unsunscribing due to the radical political views pressed through the show. I realized of the past couple of years that Christians like James white don't believe in freedom, they believe that white Christians should have freedom and that everyone else should be like them. My political views have changed over the years, and the radical nature of podcasts like these have only pushed me further away from conservatism. They claim to be for freedom but in reality are usually just theo-fascists.

Jun 22nd
Reply (10)

Joshua Sherrill

Excellent episode, Dr. White. Thanks for your labor. Praise God.

Apr 7th
Reply

MR Insensitive

Dr White, I'm still catching up on the DL, hoping to get current by the end of the day. What you say is true, and God bless you, brother! The world hates you because the world hates God. I praise God for you and all you've done.

May 11th
Reply

Kai Lo

Can I ask a question Dr. White? I always have seen in the church where there are passages used when talking about others coming to Christ and such, they use the term "he" and we associate that to mean men and women, but how come in this context (the foundation laid out for men in the church) why can we not use it the same? I'm just trying to understand. Thank you very much for your time!

Jul 5th
Reply

Jason Huntley

The #1 voted Christian podcast by Seven Years of Prosperous Memes from Pharaohs Dreams! Biblical, Reformed, and Informational. Check out Dr. Whites hundreds of debates on YouTube.

Jun 21st
Reply

Jake Veliz

Great episodes and thank you for all the time and work you put into this!

May 21st
Reply

Gerry Brinkman

I've had a couple of run-ins with Jesse over the last few years. When I tried to gently address his heresy (plural), he turtled and hid. I think that had more to do with the fact I was Facebook admin of the group he was in. Ultimately, he blocked me so I couldn't see his posts, but for some reason he forgot that I could still get administrator notices.

Apr 12th
Reply

@blueridgewv

White-shaming infiltrates Christianity causing schism by design.

Apr 10th
Reply

David Mills

I was suffering from James White withdrawals. Glad to see you back

Jan 26th
Reply

Dean Clouse

California will have its Nero soon enough.

Jun 1st
Reply

Michael

great ending!

May 31st
Reply