So, You Like Horror? Podcast

Happy Spooky Season, gang! In this week's episode of So, You Like Horror?, we ride into Tim Burton’s gothic masterpiece, Sleepy Hollow. Starring Johnny Depp as Ichabod Crane and Christina Ricci as Katrina Van Tassel, this supernatural horror classic reimagines Washington Irving’s legend with blood-soaked decapitations, fog-drenched forests, and Burton’s signature gothic flair.We break down the film’s eerie plot, explore its blend of science and superstition, and discuss themes of corruption, trauma, gothic romance, and karmic justice. Was the true evil in Sleepy Hollow the Headless Horseman—or the human greed that summoned him? Join us as we unravel the film’s haunting atmosphere, lasting influence, and its place in horror history.Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

Happy Halloween Eve, folks! This week on the podcast, we continue our remake vs original theme by discussing one of Stephen King’s most iconic stories—Carrie. First adapted by Brian De Palma in 1976, the film became a cultural touchstone, cementing its place in horror history with unforgettable performances and one of cinema’s most haunting finales. Nearly four decades later, Kimberly Peirce’s 2013 remake attempted to bring the story into the modern age, complete with cyberbullying, viral humiliation, and CGI-driven destruction. We break down both versions, examining how Sissy Spacek’s painfully vulnerable Carrie compares to Chloë Grace Moretz’s more confident take, and how Piper Laurie’s religious fanatic Margaret White contrasts with Julianne Moore’s psychologically abusive portrayal. Along the way, we explore the themes of puberty, repression, bullying, and revenge, and ask the ultimate question: Does the remake add new depth to the story, or does it remain in the shadow of a classic?Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What's happening, folks? Welcome back to the podcast. This week, we dive into one of the most legendary—and controversial—films in horror history: The Blair Witch Project. I'm joined by Rikki Tikki Timber, as we explore how this micro-budget indie shocked audiences, pioneered the found-footage style, and redefined horror marketing with viral websites, fake missing posters, and whispered rumors that it was all real. We’ll break down the terrifying plot, from Heather, Mike, and Josh’s descent into paranoia in the Black Hills Forest to THAT chilling final shot. We’ll also discuss the film’s cultural impact, its role in sparking a found-footage boom (*Paranormal Activity, REC, Cloverfield*), and the recent controversy around the original cast’s lack of fair compensation despite the franchise’s massive success. 💀 Topics Covered: - How *The Blair Witch Project* blurred reality and fiction - Fear of the unknown vs. “showing the monster” - Isolation, paranoia, and folk-horror roots - Why audiences remain divided: masterpiece or overrated? - Modern legacy: would it work in today’s TikTok era? 👉 What do YOU think—did The Blair Witch Project live up to the hype? Drop your thoughts in the comments! 📌 Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and hit the bell so you never miss an episode. Follow us on Instagram: @so_you_like_horrorSupport us on Ko-Fi: https://ko-fi.com/soyoulikehorrorpodcast

🚨 Bonus Episode Alert! 🚨This week on the podcast, Maryland Phil and Chucky O. take over to discuss two franchises linked in so many ways, but separated in this instance.First up: Predator: Killer of Killers — They share initial impressions, what worked, what didn’t, and why the Yautja lore still keeps us hooked. They talk about how humans clash with the hunters, the concern of skipping canon just to ramp up action, and their hopes for the upcoming Predator: Badlands. And they give a Good, Bad, and Ugly rundown. 🩸🔥Then, they shift to Alien: Earth Episodes 1 & 2. How does it compare to Alien: Romulus? From nostalgia and horror vibes that don’t rely on cheap jump scares to new lore, tech, and creatures — they cover it all. They even break down the music choices in the credits and where this story fits in the Alien mythos timeline. Creepy, chilling, and cinematic. 🫣🎧 Available now wherever you get your podcasts!👉 Tap the link in bio to listen, and tell us in the comments: which franchise has you more hyped right now — Predator or Alien?Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

Two Dawns. Two Malls. One Zombie Showdown. 🧟‍♂️🧟‍♂️ Slow & shambling… or fast & feral?It’s Dawn of the Dead (1978) vs. Dawn of the Dead (2004) — two malls, two zombie apocalypses, and one big question: Which one would you survive? 🩸From Romero’s consumerism satire and iconic blue-skinned undead to Snyder’s sprinting chaos and relentless gore, we’re breaking down every bite, brawl, and blood-splatter in this ultimate zombie showdown.🎧 Be sure to comment and let us know: Team Romero or Team Snyder?#SoYouLikeHorror #DawnOfTheDead #HorrorRemake #ZombieCinema #HorrorCommunity #ZombieFans #HorrorMovieNight #HorrorTalk #HorrorGeek #CultHorror #RomeroZombies #HorrorContentCreator #UndeadApocalypse

What's happening, friends? This week on the podcast, Sarah Beth and I wanted to talk about Ryan Coogler’s vampire tale, Sinners, set in 1932 Clarksdale, Mississippi. Blending supernatural horror with rich historical and cultural themes, Sinners tells the story of twin brothers Smoke and Stack, who return to the Deep South to open a juke joint with stolen mob money, only to find themselves battling not just racism and family tensions, but a growing vampiric threat led by an Irish bloodsucker named Remmick. What unfolds is a confrontation between tradition and temptation, freedom and survival. We break down the film scene by scene, from opening night at the juke joint to the tragic brother-versus-brother showdown, and reflect on its layered themes: music as cultural magic, vampirism as a metaphor for racial exploitation, and the emotional weight of grief, family, and sacrifice. Sinners offers a powerful reminder that immortality is hollow without humanity—and that true endurance lies in memory, music, and love.Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

Greetings, folks, and welcome back. This week on the podcast, we examine the shadowy legacy of one of horror’s most iconic tales, Nosferatu. Joined by guest hosts Amy and Jenn, we explore how this vampiric nightmare has evolved across generations by comparing Werner Herzog’s somber 1979 reimagining Nosferatu the Vampyre with Robert Eggers’ highly stylized and psychologically harrowing 2024 interpretation. We begin by tracing the origin of Count Orlok back to the 1922 silent classic and examine how its unauthorized adaptation of Dracula helped shape the language of horror cinema. From there, we break down the distinct tones, themes, and visual styles of the two remakes—Herzog’s mournful plague-soaked atmosphere versus Eggers’ surreal descent into obsession and dread. We compare portrayals of Orlok himself, with Klaus Kinski’s tragic isolation contrasting Bill Skarsgård’s primal menace. The conversation dives deep into symbolism and German Expressionist influences that haunt both versions. Whether you're drawn to the slow decay of the 1979 film or the claustrophobic terror of 2024, this episode dares to ask: Which Nosferatu lingers in your nightmares?Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

Greetings, folks! This week on the podcast, I'm joined by George Ivanoff as we take a deep dive into the apocalyptic trilogy that redefined modern horror—28 Days Later, 28 Weeks Later, and the freshly released 28 Years Later. We begin by revisiting 28 Days Later, Danny Boyle’s 2002 classic that launched fast-moving infected into the genre and delivered a raw, emotionally charged vision of a crumbling society. The film's meditations on loneliness, moral decay, and the fragility of civilization still resonate, especially in today’s world. Next, we explore 28 Weeks Later, a sequel that shifts focus from personal survival to institutional failure, showing how military efforts to contain the Rage Virus collapse under pressure, leading to brutal consequences. Finally, we unpack 28 Years Later, a bold continuation that pushes the franchise into a post-pandemic landscape. Set decades after the original outbreak, the film centers on a new generation, examining tribalism, generational trauma, and hope amid a fractured, quarantined Britain. Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What's up, you culty loons? This week on the podcast, I sit down with Scott Thomas to dissect one of horror’s most infamous remake showdowns—The Wicker Man (1973) vs. The Wicker Man (2006). We explore the allure of the 1973 folk horror classic, examining its themes of religious conflict, sexual repression, blind faith, and cultural relativism. Then, the conversation shifts to Nicolas Cage’s wild 2006 remake—a film that’s equal parts psychological thriller, fever dream, and meme-worthy chaos. The episode dives deep into how both versions tackle community versus individualism, human sacrifice, and the symbolic power of ritual. From the haunting folk songs of the original to the unforgettable “Not the bees!” moment, this discussion pulls apart the artistic intentions, thematic contrasts, character dynamics, and cult legacies of two very different films with the same burning finale. Whether you're a purist or just here for the insanity, this episode offers a thoughtful journey through one of horror’s strangest cinematic rituals.Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What's up, freaks? This week on the podcast, I tackle the legacy of Friday the 13th by comparing the 1980 original to its 2009 remake. We begin with a breakdown of both films—Sean S. Cunningham’s suspenseful whodunit that introduced Pamela Voorhees as one of horror’s earliest female slashers, and Marcus Nispel’s grittier reimagining that transformed Jason into a brutal, territorial hunter. We discuss how the two films differ in structure, tone, violence, character archetypes, and especially in the portrayal of Jason—from a tragic child’s memory to a relentless predator with survivalist instincts. Despite their differences, both versions share familiar slasher elements: the eerie setting of Camp Crystal Lake, the indulgent teen victims, and the iconic “ki ki ki, ma ma ma” score that still signals incoming doom. We explore recurring themes like grief, vengeance, trauma, and morality, while also unpacking how the franchise has evolved with the times. Finally, we examine the franchise’s stalled cinematic future, the ongoing legal battle that’s frozen Jason’s return, and the hope offered by A24’s upcoming Crystal Lake prequel series. Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What’s happening, spooky folk? This week on the podcast, I welcome back Rikki Tikki Timber to break down Jordan Peele’s psychological horror film Get Out. We explore how Peele uses suspense, dark humor, and disturbing visuals to highlight themes of racism, identity erasure, and control. From the unforgettable “Sunken Place” scene to the coded language of liberal hypocrisy at the Armitage family’s dinner party, we dissect the film’s layered metaphors and social commentary. We also examine key characters like Chris, Rose, and Rod, and how their roles reflect broader societal dynamics. Together, we dive into the symbolism behind the mysterious "Behold the Coagula" and the Death Cheetah vs. Matter poster in Chris's apartment—unpacking how they enrich the narrative’s deeper messages. Plus, we discuss the film’s original, darker ending and why Jordan Peele chose to give audiences a rare moment of triumph. This episode is meant to be a tense, thoughtful, and sometimes uncomfortable conversation, but it’s Rikki and I, so we got jokes that are probably not ok.Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What’s up, humans? This week on the podcast, I’m joined by Chad and Eugene to break down the 2025 sci-fi horror film Companion. We explore the existential and ethical questions the film raises: Are sentient machines deserving of rights? What defines humanity and self-awareness? We also praise standout performances, such as Sophie Thatcher’s evolution from naive companion to self-aware survivor, and Jack Quaid’s portrayal of a manipulative partner. We make comparisons to Ex Machina, M3GAN, and Black Mirror, and discuss the film’s major twists. Wrapping up, we, each give a Good, Bad, and Ugly, along with our final scoring of the film. We also weigh in on whether Companion adds anything new to the AI horror conversation or just reboots familiar fears with a glossy finish. Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What’s up, sleepy heads? This week on the podcast, I’m joined by Jon Yoe as we dive into the nightmares of Springwood to compare A Nightmare on Elm Street from 1984 and its 2010 reimagining. In this episode, we explore how Wes Craven's original reshaped the slasher genre by blending supernatural terror with psychological depth, and introduced one of horror’s most unforgettable villains—Freddy Krueger. We break down the surreal, dream-fueled horror of the original, Freddy’s evolution into a charismatic icon, and how themes like teenage trauma, distrust in authority, and fear of sleep made it a genre-defining film.Then we shift to the 2010 remake, which aimed to bring a grittier, more grounded version of Freddy to modern audiences. We unpack its emphasis on repressed trauma, psychological realism, and the stark shift in Freddy’s portrayal—from theatrical killer to cold predator.We also compare the similarities and key differences between the two films, before closing out with a look at the cultural legacy of Elm Street, Freddy’s influence on horror history, and why the remake didn’t quite strike the same chord.Whether you’re team New Line Cinema or team Platinum Dunes, this episode slices into what makes A Nightmare on Elm Street a pillar of horror—and why Freddy Krueger continues to haunt our collective subconscious.Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What’s up, horror fans? This week on the podcast, I’m joined by Kyle Prescott, as we dive into three standout alien horror films—Signs from 2002, Dark Skies from 2013, and Nope from 2022. At first glance, they all center on extra-terrestrial threats, but it’s the human drama beneath the surface that unites them. We break down each film’s plot and themes, from Signs' intimate story of faith and grief to Dark Skies' portrayal of a family unraveling under invisible invasion, and Nope’s genre-bending commentary on trauma, spectacle, and survival. Our conversation explores common threads like the focus on family, the fear of the unseen, and how each film uses atmosphere over jump scares to unsettle. We also discuss how these stories reflect deep psychological fears—loss of control, being watched, and the powerlessness of confronting forces beyond comprehension. Whether you’re a fan of slow-burn spiritual horror or mind-bending alien metaphors, this episode uncovers what makes these films terrifying, thought-provoking, and unforgettable.Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What’s up, you Thingamajigs? This week on the podcast, Maryland Phil and I, dive deep into two iconic interpretations of John W. Campbell Jr.’s novella Who Goes There?—The Thing from Another World (1951) and John Carpenter’s The Thing (1982). We explore how these two films, separated by three decades, offer drastically different takes on the same terrifying concept.We start with the 1951 classic, a Cold War-era sci-fi thriller set in an Arctic outpost, where a plant-based alien menace triggers panic and cooperation among a tight-knit military-scientific crew. Then, we descend into the paranoia-soaked landscape of Carpenter’s 1982 remake, where an Antarctic research team is torn apart by a shape-shifting parasite that could be hiding in any one of them.From Cold War optimism to post-Watergate cynicism, from offscreen menace to grotesque practical effects, we break down:Thematic differences: unity vs. paranoia, trust vs. suspicionVisual styles and creature design: implied horror vs. unforgettable body horrorLegacy and influence on modern media: The X-Files, Stranger Things, Among Us, and moreWhether you're a fan of pulp sci-fi or slow-burning existential dread, this episode is for you. Tune in and decide for yourself.Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.#GothBeautiful #SevenPages

What’s happening, horror lovers? This week on the podcast, I welcome @scotthmas83 as we sit down and discuss the 2007 horror sci-fi film adaptation of Stephen King’s “The Mists”. We begin with the harrowing arrival of the mist after a violent storm, trapping David Drayton, his young son Billy, and a group of townspeople inside a supermarket. As military trucks speed through town and a bloodied man bursts in warning, “There’s something in the mist!”—paranoia and primal fear take over. We break down the terrifying creature attacks, the rise of Mrs. Carmody’s apocalyptic religious cult, and the failed escape attempts that drive the group toward psychological collapse. From the film’s exploration of fear, faith, and human nature to its devastating ending that left audiences gasping, we discuss why The Mist remains one of the most nihilistic and emotionally jarring horror films ever made. We also unpack the film’s heavy symbolism—from the dangers of religious extremism to the hopelessness that creeps in when survival feels just out of reach. Whether you love or hate that final scene, you can’t deny how it affected the audience.Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What's up, Ghost Hunters? This week on the podcast, we dive into the haunted history of 13 Ghosts from 1960 and its 2001 remake, Thir13en Ghosts. We explore how William Castle’s campy original introduced audiences to haunted house gimmicks like Illusion-O and playful ghost designs, while Steve Beck’s remake turned up the intensity with brutal supernatural horror, complex ghost backstories, and a darker tone. From the playful mystery of the original’s haunted inheritance to the remake’s twisted mythology involving the Black Zodiac and the Ocularis Infernum, we break down the key differences in tone, ghost design, and storytelling. We also discuss how the 2001 remake achieved cult status despite mixed reviews. Which version holds up better? Tune in to find out — and let us know which one you prefer! 👻💀Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What’s up, horror fiends? This week on the podcast, we’re diving headfirst into the eerie, Vatican-centric world of exorcism horror with 2023's The Pope’s Exorcist. Joining me once again is Shoky from the Now, You Made It Awkward Podcast, and together, we break down the film’s gothic horror atmosphere, intense action-thriller elements, and its deeper themes of faith, doubt, and institutional secrecy.Does The Pope’s Exorcist stand out in the crowded world of exorcism films, or is it just another flick full of spinning heads and Latin chants? We explore the movie’s unique take on supernatural horror, dissect its strengths and weaknesses, and question whether it brings something fresh to the genre.The Pope’s Exorcist is a 2023 supernatural horror film. It is based on the writings of real-life exorcist Father Gabriele Amorth. The film stars Russell Crowe as Amorth. The story follows his investigation into a young boy’s possession in Spain, which leads him to uncover a sinister conspiracy buried deep within the Vatican’s history. As Father Gabrielle delves into the case, he encounters disturbing supernatural phenomena, challenging his faith and forcing him to confront long-hidden secrets about the Church’s past.Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.Don't forget to check out Shoky's channels over on YouTubehttps://www.youtube.com/@THEShokyhttps://www.youtube.com/@nowyoumadeitawkwardpodcasthttps://www.youtube.com/@ITDOESNTHAVETOMAKESENSE

What's up, Horror Junkies? This week, I'm joined by Sarah Beth to celebrate my birthday as we take a deep dive into the 10 horror films that shaped my love for the genre. From the meta-horror brilliance of Scream to the relentless terror of Halloween and A Nightmare on Elm Street, we explore how slasher icons like Ghostface, Michael Myers, and Freddy Krueger redefined horror and kept us up at night. We then shift gears to the chilling realism of The Strangers and the tragic horror of Carrie, analyzing how psychological and home invasion horror tap into our deepest fears. The conversation continues with supernatural terror in Paranormal Activity and gothic romance in Bram Stoker’s Dracula, proving that horror thrives in both the unseen and the poetic. Finally, we round out the discussion with the anthology brilliance of Trick ‘r Treat, the gruesome fate of Final Destination, and the apocalyptic chaos of Zack Snyder's Dawn of the Dead. Join us for a journey through the films that left a permanent scar on our horror-loving hearts. Don’t forget to subscribe, leave a review, and let us know which horror films shaped you!Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What's up, folks? This week on the podcast, I'm flying solo. So, for this episode, I will explore The Amityville Horror in our Remake vs. Original series, comparing the eerie 1979 classic to its intense 2005 remake. We begin with the real-life horror behind 112 Ocean Avenue before analyzing the original film’s slow-burn psychological terror and the remake’s modern, action-driven scares. From George Lutz’s descent into madness to the film’s use of special effects, I debate which version is scarier and holds up best today and why none of that matters anyway. So tune in for the final verdict, share your thoughts, and stay connected for what's next. The Amityville Horror films, released in 1979 and 2005, depict one of horror’s most infamous haunted house stories. The 1979 film takes a slow-burning, psychological approach, becoming a classic in the haunted house subgenre, while the 2005 remake modernizes the story with a faster pace, intense visuals, and a darker portrayal of George Lutz’s descent into madness. Despite their stylistic differences, both films continue to intrigue audiences and spark debate over the real events behind the legend. Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.