DiscoverPhilosopher's Zone
Philosopher's Zone
Claim Ownership

Philosopher's Zone

Author: ABC

Subscribed: 9,176Played: 219,285
Share

Description

The simplest questions often have the most complex answers. The Philosopher's Zone is your guide through the strange thickets of logic, metaphysics and ethics.
476 Episodes
Reverse
What is pleasure?

What is pleasure?

2026-11-0437:421

Is everything we do just for pleasure? For the Ancient Greek hedonists, and utilitarians such as Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832), pleasure is what motivates us. And for most of us, if we think of a good life, we're probably imagining one filled with things that bring us pleasure. Because of its role in motivation, pleasure is now a major topic in psychology, biology and neuroscience - but pleasure is a surprisingly ambiguous concept. Not all pleasures are good, and in fact some can make us worse off. What can philosophy tell us about pleasure and the role it plays in our lives?Guest: Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Łódź, PolandProducers: Declan Humphreys, Lecturer in the School of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, QueenslandDavid RutledgeThe Philosophy of Pleasure: An Introduction by Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek (Routledge, 2024)Lives Well Lived - podcast with Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek and Peter SingerCan't Unthink It - podcast with Declan Humphreys, about the little ideas philosophers just can't get out of their heads
When your political system runs to a three-year electoral cycle, it's hard to avoid the kind of short-term thinking that aims to please today's voters, while paying little more than lip service to future generations. And while this has long been a concern for liberal democracies, today it's an existential issue, as the decisions we make now about climate change will affect the lives of citizens over decades and even centuries from now. Indigenous philosophies have long recognised the importance of government that honours its obligations to future - and even past - generations. But what does this look like in practice? and what ethical issues come into play when Western philosophy treats Indigenous knowledge traditions as a resource to be 'mined'?This episode is fifth in a five-part series.Guest: Krushil Watene, Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Auckland, Aoteraroa New ZealandProducer: David RutledgePursuing Climate Justice: Practice-Centred Theory, Indigenous Communities, and Engaged Philosophical Inquiry by Krushil Watene in Brooke A. Ackerly et al (eds): The Oxford Handbook of Grounded and Engaged Normative Theory (Oxford Academic 2026)Episode 1 | Unsteady State | Politics and the good life - The Philosopher's Zone, October 4 2026Episode 2 | Unsteady State | Who owns Antarctica? - The Philosopher's Zone, October 11 2026Episode 3 | Unsteady State | What the Right gets wrong about Nietzsche - The Philosopher's Zone, October 18 2026Episode 4 | Unsteady State | Confucianism and crisis - The Philosopher's Zone, October 25 2026
With liberal democracy in crisis around the world, we're talking about Confucianism and how Confucian political theory addresses such problems as economic inequality and rampant individualism. This week's guest is interested in developing a reconstructed Confucianism that incorporates aspects of American pragmatist philosophy — in particular the work of John Dewey, who visited China in the 1920s and made a huge intellectual and cultural impact there.This episode is fourth in a five-part series.Guest: Sor-hoon Tan, Professor of Philosophy at Singapore Management UniversityProducer: David RutledgeConfucian Democracy: A Deweyan Reconstruction of Confucianism by Sor-hoon Tan (SUNY Press 2004)The crisis of liberal democracy and the Confucian challenge: a pragmatist response by Sor-hoon Tan in Journal of Social and Political Philosophy (2022)Toward Confucian economic democracy: a relational alternative to possessive individualism by Sor-hoon Tan in Democratic Theory: An Interdisciplinary Journal (2026)01 | Unsteady State | Politics and the good life - The Philosopher's Zone, October 4 202602 | Unsteady State | Who owns Antarctica? - The Philosopher's Zone, October 11 202603 | Unsteady State | What the Right gets wrong about Nietzsche - The Philosopher's Zone, October 18 202605 | Unsteady State | Politics for the future and the past - The Philosopher's Zone, November 1 2026
Friedrich Nietzsche is a difficult figure to pin down politically. He's popularly known as the favourite philosopher of the architects of the Holocaust, and of today's neo-Nazis and far-right ideologues who venerate strength, domination and the exercise of traditionally male-coded virtues. But then there's the other Nietzsche, the Nietzsche who was a fierce critic of German nationalism and antisemitism, and whose work has gone on to become central to feminism and queer theory. What can Nietzsche tell us about today's febrile climate of state and gender politics?This episode is third in a five-part series.Guest: Adrian Daub, Professor of Comparative Literature and German Studies at Stanford University, co-host of the podcast In Bed With the RightProducer: David RutledgeThe Cancel Culture Panic: How an American Obsession Went Global by Adrian Daub (Stanford University Press 2024)What Tech Calls Governing by Adrian Daub (Stanford University Press 2026)Episode 1 | Unsteady State | Politics and the good life - The Philosopher's Zone, October 4 2026Episode 2 | Unsteady State | Who owns Antarctica? - The Philosopher's Zone, October 11 2026Episode 4 | Unsteady State | Confucianism and crisis - The Philosopher's Zone, October 25 2026Episode 5 | Unsteady State | Politics for the future and the past - The Philosopher's Zone, November 1 2026
What can Antarctica teach us about statehood and sovereignty?The continent has no government, no citizens, no permanent human population. Its native inhabitants are mostly seals and penguins who, as far as we know, take little interest in politics.But according to this week's guest, Antarctica offers a remarkable political experiment, one that challenges some of our most basic assumptions about territory and political community.Since the Antarctic Treaty came into force in 1961, the usual question of who owns the territory has been set aside. Instead, Antarctica is governed according to a model of 'joint guardianship', raising the intriguing possibility that this remote frozen continent might have something crucial to teach us about how politics could work elsewhere.This episode is second in a five-part series.Guest: Alejandra Mancilla, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Oslo, NorwayProducer: David RutledgeFrom Sovereignty to Guardianship: Governing Antarctica, Governing the World by Alejandra Mancilla (Oxford University Press 2026)Episode 1 | Unsteady State | Politics and the good life - The Philosopher's Zone, October 4 2026Episode 3 | Unsteady State | What the Right gets wrong about Nietzsche - The Philosopher's Zone, October 18 2026Episode 4 | Unsteady State | Confucianism and crisis - The Philosopher's Zone, October 25 2026Episode 5 | Unsteady State | Politics for the future and the past - The Philosopher's Zone, November 1 2026
loading
Comments