The Royal Tea

This episode of The Royal Tea with Sarah Hewson, Robert Jobson and Afua Hagan tackles the ongoing controversy surrounding Prince Andrew's connection to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Specifically, they address the unsealing of court documents revealing allegations against Andrew and the implications for the Royal Family. Jobson says that the case is highly damaging to Andrew and the Royals, particularly with the emergence of new documents. He suggests that Andrew's decision not to fight the case was a mistake, and this choice continues to harm his public image.Afua discusses the legal aspect, noting that Andrew's settlement with Virginia Giuffre, Epstein's accuser, does not imply guilt but admits the situation looks bad. They agree that while the evidence may be flimsy, Andrew's judgement, especially his connection with Epstein, is questionable. Jobson mentions the potential consequences, such as losing his royal lodge, but notes the complexities due to his lease.The conversation shifts to Queen Camilla's new podcast, "The Queen's Reading Room," focusing on its format and content. Both commentators express disappointment that it doesn't feature Camilla interviewing authors, despite the podcast's name suggesting otherwise.The discussion then moves to the Princess of Wales, Kate Middleton, celebrating her 42nd birthday. They note the low-key nature of the celebrations compared to previous years, reflecting on her evolving role within the Royal Family and her future responsibilities.Finally, they touch on Prince Harry's induction as a "living legend of aviation," comparing his military service to other inductees like Buzz Aldrin. They find the award somewhat overstretched but acknowledge Harry's service.Throughout, the speakers engage in a detailed analysis of the Royal Family's current challenges and the public perceptions shaped by recent events and media portrayals. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In the midst of ongoing controversy surrounding the monarchy, the most senior members of the Royal Family put on a united front at the diplomatic reception held at Buckingham Palace. The event, which saw the King and Queen welcoming ambassadors and diplomats, was a powerful display of unity and strength in the face of recent accusations and scandals. The timing of this reception, just days after the leak of Omid Scobie's book "Endgame," sent a clear message that the Royal Family is moving forward and not allowing themselves to be derailed by scandalous claims.The photograph released after the reception showcased the King, Queen Camilla, the Prince and Princess of Wales in all their finery. This image of the four senior royals together was seen as a deliberate display of unity and determination to move on from the controversy. The reception itself was a grand affair, with over 500 members of the diplomatic corps hosted in the palace's state rooms. It was a reminder of the monarchy's role in diplomacy and their commitment to their duties.Joining Sarah Hewson to discuss all that and more are The Sun’s Royal Editor Matt Wilkinson and The Evening Standard’s Royal Editor Robert Jobson.This is the Royal Tea.Click here for more from TalkTV https://talk.tvIf you need any help visit: https://talk.tv/helplines#endgame #meghanmarkle #royalfamily #princeharry #omidscobie Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On today's Royal Tea the panel discuss all of the fallout from Omid Scobie’s explosive new book Endgame, and how a ‘misprint' has named two royals at the centre of the royal race row.Joining Sarah Hewson to discuss all that and more are royal commentator and Talk TV regular Afua Hagan and The Sun’s former Royal Editor Emily Andrews.Click here for more from TalkTV https://talk.tvIf you need any help visit: https://talk.tv/helplines Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Will King Charles offer an olive branch, however painful that might be, to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle this Christmas? Rumours suggest the King could make a difficult offer to somehow get together with the Sussexes in the UK over the Christmas period.On the rest of this week's Royal Tea the panel discuss the King’s lavish state banquet for the President of South Korea, PLUS how Harry and William could be sticking to one Christmas tradition this year and find out which royal has claimed they are brought up to not overshare.Joining Sarah Hewson to discuss all that and more are royal commentator and TalkTV host Daisy McAndrew and royal correspondent Rupert Bell.Click here for more from TalkTV https://talk.tvIf you need any help visit: https://talk.tv/helplines#royalfamily #harryandmeghan #princeharry #kingcharles Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Prince William announced the five winners of the Earthshot prize in Singapore, expressing his commitment to tackling the climate crisis and making a difference. However, there was some criticism of his efforts, with comparisons made to the longstanding environmental work of his father, Prince Charles. Meanwhile, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle faced criticism for taking a private jet to Las Vegas, despite their advocacy for environmental causes. In other news, King Charles delivered his first King's speech at the opening of Parliament, while Prince William was absent due to a clash with his Earthshot event in Singapore.In this week's Royal Tea Afua Hagan presents and is joined by The Evening Standard Royal Editor Robert Jobson and Newsweek's Chief Royal Correspondent Jack Royston.Click here for more from TalkTV https://talk.tv Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jeremy Kyle speaks to royal historian Andrew Lownie as the crisis surrounding Prince Andrew intensifies, with suggestions any future trials linked to Jeffrey Epstein and Peter Mandelson could drag on for a year. The pair discuss Andrew’s growing isolation at Sandringham, including reports of a visit from the King’s domestic chaplain, and whether talk of repentance is genuine or simply reputation management. Lownie is blunt, arguing Andrew still appears more concerned with status and privilege than remorse, despite mounting public anger.Attention then turns to the reported decision to bar Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie from Royal Ascot. Lownie describes the move as a highly symbolic distancing by King Charles, suggesting it may indicate deeper concerns within the palace about what could still emerge. He reiterates that the York daughters were adults during key moments of the Epstein saga and claims their business links and travel history deserve scrutiny as part of a wider pattern of royal networking and influence.Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Kevin O’Sullivan is joined by historian and author Andrew Lownie to discuss the escalating Prince Andrew investigation and what he describes as a widening establishment scandal. Lownie argues that scrutiny must not stop with Andrew, insisting former palace officials, UK Trade & Investment figures and even senior royals should face serious questioning over what they knew and when. He claims there has been a long standing culture of secrecy and deference, warning that the public is no longer prepared to accept silence from the top.Lownie also raises the stakes by suggesting the issue goes beyond personal misconduct, calling it a potential national security concern tied to Andrew’s international connections during his time as trade envoy. He questions whether key documents will ever be fully released and warns that kicking disclosures “into the long grass” will only fuel suspicion. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Angela Levin joins both Kevin O’Sullivan and Jeremy Kyle to tear into Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s latest trip to Jordan, branding it a “show off” exercise designed purely for headlines. Speaking about what she calls their third “pretend royal tour” after Nigeria and Colombia, Levin claims the Sussexes are driven by attention and rivalry, suggesting the visit is a direct response to Prince William’s recent Middle East trip. “They want to look better than William and Catherine,” she says, accusing Meghan of chasing photographs rather than delivering meaningful help.In a separate interview, Levin turns to the deepening Prince Andrew scandal and growing scrutiny of King Charles. She argues the King never wanted Andrew as trade envoy and was ultimately “very pleased” when the role ended, but admits public trust in the monarchy is being tested “like never before.” On the Sussexes’ timing, she is scathing, calling the Jordan visit “disgusting” and alleging it is designed to distract from royal turmoil at home. As questions mount over Andrew, transparency and the future of the monarchy, Levin insists the institution can survive, but only if it navigates the crisis carefully and restores confidence. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jeremy Kyle speaks to former head of Royal Protection Dai Davies as questions intensify over what protection officers knew during Prince Andrew’s visits to Jeffrey Epstein’s properties. Davies says it is “eminently fair” that former Royal Protection officers are investigated, arguing that if they travelled with Andrew to locations in New York, the Virgin Islands and elsewhere, they “must have seen something.” He suggests officers would have conducted reconnaissance visits and liaised with local authorities, raising serious questions about what due diligence was carried out and whether warnings were ignored.Davies goes further, alleging a long-running “conspiracy of silence” around Andrew’s conduct and calling for senior palace officials and potentially members of the Royal Family to be questioned if they were aware of relevant information. He argues that stripping Andrew of titles suggests those at the top were already convinced of serious wrongdoing, and insists the monarchy can only survive if it embraces full transparency and proves value for money. Without openness, he warns, public trust will continue to erode as the demand for accountability grows.Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jeremy Kyle kicks off with US royal commentator Kinsey Schofield as the Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor scandal dominates headlines again, with Kyle pressing on why the government is refusing to release full files linked to Andrew and his trade envoy years. Schofield warns that holding documents back only fuels public suspicion, saying the public is “sick of” drip-fed revelations and wants “the full picture”. They also touch on the push to remove Andrew from the line of succession, with Schofield stressing it is legally complex and would need parliamentary action and wider Commonwealth agreement, while Kyle argues the court of public opinion has already turned and the monarchy needs sharper transparency to stop the story spiralling.Later, author and historian Andrew Lownie tells Kyle the fallout could widen far beyond Andrew, arguing more palace staff, officials and former UK trade figures should be questioned about what they knew. Lownie says William and the King should be treated as potential “material witnesses” in terms of what the royal household knew and when, and claims the monarchy is at a crossroads where secrecy is no longer sustainable. He calls for a “reset” built on openness and proper scrutiny, warning the palace cannot rely on waiting for the problem to fade as anger grows and the questions keep coming. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Julia Hartley-Brewer speaks to historian and royal author Andrew Lownie about fresh parliamentary moves to release documents relating to Prince Andrew’s 2001 appointment as UK trade envoy. As MPs table a motion to force publication of government papers, Lownie warns of “a huge, huge scandal” that goes beyond financial and sexual allegations and could amount to a “national security scandal.” He argues Andrew was “helped and abetted by a whole series of people” and calls for ambassadors, former UK Trade & Investment officials and senior figures to be questioned under oath about what they knew and when.The interview explores claims of a culture of “secrecy and deference” within the establishment, with Lownie suggesting senior figures, including the King, must have been aware of longstanding concerns about Andrew’s conduct. He calls for royal finances to face proper parliamentary scrutiny, unsealing of royal wills and removal of exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act. Questioning whether key documents will ever be released, Lownie predicts the issue could be delayed for years, warning that the establishment may seek to “kick this into the long grass” rather than allow full public accountability.Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jeremy Kyle speaks to royal biographer Angela Levin about fresh allegations surrounding Prince Andrew’s expenses as UK trade envoy and the mounting reputational damage to the Royal Family. Levin describes the claims as “sickening” and calls Andrew “a very unpleasant human being,” warning the controversy is fuelling wider public anger and scrutiny over royal finances and transparency. The pair discuss whether the monarchy has lost prestige, with Levin arguing the institution can recover over time by focusing on the work of the King and senior working royals despite what she calls an “endless running” stream of damaging headlines.The interview also explores growing pressure from the public, comparisons with the backlash after Princess Diana’s death, and concerns about declining trust in the monarchy. Levin says the current anger will “calm down” but admits it will be “harder” for the Royal Family in the short term, while Jeremy Kyle highlights calls for greater accountability and openness. The conversation widens to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, with Levin claiming the Sussexes are focused on protecting their “brand” as the wider royal crisis continues to dominate global headlines. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jeremy Kyle speaks to US royal commentator Kinsey Schofield about the escalating Prince Andrew scandal, fresh allegations over taxpayer-funded expenses during his time as UK trade envoy, and the growing pressure on King Charles. Discussing claims that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor charged personal massages to the public purse, Schofield remarks that he may have heard “public service and thought it meant the public service is him,” adding that he has “become a joke” amid what she calls “the worst crisis the monarchy has seen in my lifetime.” They also examine reports of a protest stunt at the Louvre, underlining the global reputational damage facing the Royal Family.The conversation explores mounting calls for accountability, transparency over royal finances, and whether Prince Andrew should be removed from the line of succession. Schofield explains that such a move would require new legislation and agreement across the Commonwealth, while Kyle argues public scrutiny of the monarchy is only intensifying. Despite the controversy, Schofield defends the constitutional monarchy as a vital source of political neutrality and soft power, warning that losing it could risk the kind of deep political polarisation seen in the United States. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Kevin O’Sullivan speaks to former BBC Royal Editor Michael Cole as the Prince Andrew investigation intensifies, with fresh allegations over misuse of public money and growing pressure on King Charles. Cole warns, “You couldn’t exaggerate the seriousness of the situation for the monarchy,” as calls for accountability and even treason questions fuel the deepening Royal Family crisis.Ian Collins then interviews royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams on the latest in the Prince Andrew misconduct in public office probe and fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein files. Calling it “a very serious crisis” and highlighting the “drip, drip, drip of allegations,” Fitzwilliams examines what this means for Prince William and the future of the monarchy as scrutiny continues. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ian Collins speaks to royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams as the Prince Andrew arrest investigation deepens. With searches ongoing and questions mounting over alleged misconduct in public office, Fitzwilliams describes the situation as “a very serious crisis” for the Royal Family, warning of the “drip, drip, drip of allegations” linked to the Jeffrey Epstein files. Could further revelations emerge? What does this mean for King Charles and Prince William? And how high is the legal bar for prosecution? As scrutiny intensifies, the future of the monarchy is under fresh pressure.Later, Julia Hartley-Brewer is joined by commentator Benedict Spence to debate whether calls for a treason investigation go too far. Spence warns it is “very dangerous territory” and a “slippery slope,” while Julia insists “nobody in this country should be above the law.” As multiple police investigations continue and political tensions rise, the episode explores accountability, due process and whether Britain’s institutions are facing their biggest trust test in decades. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Julia Hartley-Brewer speaks to former Sun Royal Editor Charlie Rae about the deepening crisis surrounding Andrew and the wider implications for the monarchy. Rae admits the scandal is “clearly damaging” and overshadowing the Royal Family’s public work, with questions now stretching “all the way to the top.” He says the key issue may not be the alleged offences themselves but whether there was any attempt to conceal the truth: “It’s never the alleged crime – it’s always the cover-up.”Rae argues that while Andrew must face full investigation, the inquiry should ultimately go wider to establish “who knew what and when.” He does not believe the King or Prince William were involved in any cover-up, suggesting they may have been reassured by Andrew at the time. However, he accepts that an independent or parliamentary-style probe may eventually be needed once criminal investigations conclude. Above all, he stresses the importance of not losing sight of the trafficking allegations, saying that the plight of alleged victims is “much, much more important” than disputes over leaked emails or royal embarrassment.Later Julia speaks to royal commentator and historian Rafe Heydel-Mankoo about whether the Andrew scandal risks inflicting lasting damage on the monarchy. Heydel-Mankoo acknowledges a wider “disconnect between the British public and our institutions” and accepts that calls for transparency are justified. However, he argues that public anger is being aimed “squarely at Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor,” not at King Charles or Prince William, warning that some reactions – including talk of treason or removing Andrew from the line of succession – are “hysterical” and constitutionally unnecessary. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Meghan Markle’s latest alleged ultimatum to Prince Harry sets the tone for a royals-only first half-hour, as Kevin O’Sullivan, Samara Gill and Ash Gould tear into the fallout from Prince Andrew’s arrest and the widening Epstein shadow now hanging over the Yorks. Kevin claims Meghan has ordered Harry to cut ties with Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie as scrutiny intensifies around their past proximity to Epstein, with the panel stressing the sisters were “19 and 20” not “little girls” when they were taken to Epstein’s Florida mansion, and arguing the optics around money, travel and privilege are “not a good look”. Samara is blunt: “I’ve got no sympathy for them,” while Kevin says Meghan “spotted the problem” with the Yorks early and is now in full image control mode.Then the conversation detonates into breaking news: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office, with Kevin calling it “the biggest story I’ve ever covered” and Samara warning the stakes are huge: “The maximum sentence for that is a lifetime of imprisonment.” As police search property and questions swirl about who knew what, from royal protection officers to palace insiders, Samara says “this wasn’t a one man show… an entire apparatus”, while Ash fears the crisis could snowball upwards: “Did the King know anything about it?” The trio repeatedly stress it’s allegations and no charges, but the theme is unmistakable: a monarchy facing a trust test, and a royal soap opera getting darker by the day. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Samara Gill speaks to former head of Royal Protection Dai Davies, who brands the unfolding royal scandal “unprecedented” and constitutionally serious. Davies warns the “tentacles are far reaching”, stretching across government departments, police forces and palace officials, and says there appears to have been a “complete conspiracy of silence” lasting decades. He insists the focus must return to victims, arguing British authorities failed to act earlier despite serious allegations involving UK citizens.Davies questions why due diligence was not carried out on Andrew’s associates and travel, asking: “Where is the audit trail? Follow the money trail.” He says protection officers, diplomats and senior palace figures should all be examined, adding it “beggars belief” that nothing untoward was reported during overseas visits. He also raises concerns about potential national security implications, suggesting security services and ministers must answer what they knew and when.Turning to the King, Davies says it is “uncharted waters” and admits he feels sympathy given the monarch’s health, but stresses that neither the palace nor government can “hide from telling the truth.” If wrongdoing or concealment were proven, he says, consequences would have to follow “like everyone else in this sorry saga.” Asked whether Andrew could ever face prison, Davies replies bluntly: “Call me cynical – I doubt it.” Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jeremy Kyle speaks to royal biographer Angela Levin, who admits she briefly considered whether King Charles might have to abdicate to protect the monarchy, before changing her mind. Levin argues the country needs “someone who knows everything about the royal family” to calm the crisis, insisting Charles is steady and experienced enough to ride it out. While questions persist over the £12 million settlement and who knew what, she says it is unclear whether the King was aware and suggests the late Queen was “blinded by love” for Andrew and did not want to hear negative information in her final years.Levin is scathing about Andrew’s reported behaviour, saying she was “absolutely furious” to read he still expects to be called “sir”, branding him “a nasty piece” and warning the situation could worsen as more details emerge. She rejects claims that Prince William is manoeuvring for the throne, describing him instead as “very unhappy” and emotionally strained by his father’s and wife’s illnesses, but respectful of his father’s position.Jeremy also speaks to former Security Minister Tom Tugendhat about whether alleged misconduct involving Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and others could amount to treason. Tugendhat stresses that nothing has been proven but says the real issue is “betrayal” and the damage it does to public trust. He notes Britain’s treason laws are centuries old and not fit for modern cases involving leaked secrets or insider dealing, but argues the broader question is what betrayal of the country means today. While careful not to prejudice any investigation, he says the allegations represent a “very serious loss of confidence” and warns that trust in institutions – from the Royal Family to government departments – must be rebuilt if faith in the system is to survive. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.