The LSAT Simplified: A Hey Future Lawyer Podcast

Ben opens this episode by examining the rapid rise of LSAT accommodations and asking whether the emperor wears no clothes when people claim that extra time creates fairness. He uses recent research to show how time based accommodations change the nature of the LSAT and reduce its ability to predict first year law school performance.He walks through findings that extended time LSAT scores tend to overpredict law school GPA and explains why this happens when timing pressure is removed from a skills based exam. Ben then connects these results to broader cultural trends in higher education, where diagnoses of ADHD, anxiety, and depression have accelerated and accommodations have become routine at elite universities.From there he looks at how the same shift is appearing in the workplace, with younger employees expecting accommodations as a normal part of their environment. Across the episode he returns to one core question. If accommodations significantly alter the LSAT, should they exist for a test designed to measure reading skill, reasoning, and processing speed under constraint.He closes by acknowledging the tension between the philosophical concerns and the practical reality. Even if accommodations change the test, they can meaningfully boost admissions results and scholarship outcomes, which means students must understand the incentives driving the system.Links referenced Professor Derek T. Muller, Access to Democracy https://www.accessdemocracy.com/post/what-do-time-accommodations-do-to-the-predictive-value-of-lsat-scores-for-legal-educationThe Atlantic, “Accommodations in Higher Education” https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2024/12/college-student-accommodations-rise-disability/678803Tannenbaum Helpern, “The ADA Generation’s Impact on Employee Requests for Accommodations and Leave Based on Disabilities” https://www.thsh.com/resources/the-ada-generations-impact-on-employee-requests-for-accommodations-and-leave-based-on-disabilities👉 Find everything at linktr.ee/heyfuturelawyer

👉 Find everything at linktr.ee/heyfuturelawyerIn this episode of the Hey Future Lawyer Podcast, Ben breaks down everything pre-law students need heading into Thanksgiving—how to handle unsolicited advice, how to respond to relatives who don’t understand the LSAT, and how to avoid rushing into law school prematurely. He explains why applying late cripples scholarship chances and outlines what actually determines long-term law school ROI.Ben also gives a sneak peek at Black Friday LSAT deals, the limited admissions-consulting spots he’s opening, and major updates to the HeyFutureLawyer drilling algorithm. He walks through the science behind adaptive drilling, why “question-type drilling” creates fake mastery, and how score ranges—not single scores—should guide when you take the LSAT.This episode dives deep into law school outcomes, debt-to-income ratios, and the data behind which schools actually place grads in BigLaw and federal clerkships. Ben previews the 10 worst law schools in America (by debt-to-income), and explains how predatory pricing, weak placement, and bad advice can wreck a student’s financial future.Finally, Ben answers an overflowing mailbag—LSAT timelines, whether to retake, GPA addenda, T14 chances, letters of recommendation, and whether law school is worth it for accounting majors or URM applicants. If you’re trying to make smart, data-driven decisions about the LSAT and law school, this episode gives you the frameworks you need.

👉 Find everything here: linktr.ee/heyfuturelawyer In today’s episode, Ben breaks down two major new tools on HeyFutureLawyer.com—our law school Outcomes Calculator (heyfuturelawyer.com/outcomes) and our brand-new ROI Calculator (heyfuturelawyer.com/ROI-calculator). Ben walks through how to use each tool, the data behind them, and the surprising “hidden gem” law schools that outperform their rankings in real employment outcomes. He also explains why national rankings often mislead applicants and how location, clerkships, and regional markets shape actual career opportunities.You’ll also hear the full story of how Ben scored in the 99th percentile twice before turning 21, including the messy parts—bad early diagnostics, studying inconsistently, being naturally strong in reading-based sections, and hitting ceilings with parallel reasoning. Ben shares how COVID changed his study routine, how he adopted an “hour-per-day” method he later taught to thousands, and why the LSAT ended up being a turning point despite thinking he’d never be a lawyer.In the final segment, Ben reflects on growing up with a speech impediment, thinking law wasn’t an option, nearly pursuing STEM, and eventually discovering the LSAT through boredom in a mandatory Indian history class. The episode wraps with thoughts on discipline, obsessiveness, and the odd path that turns a 19-year-old college kid into a full-time LSAT teacher.

and only one test left—is a losing play. He breaks down LSAT “ranges” vs a single “score,” and why hitting the top of your range radically changes both admissions outcomes and scholarships.We map law school decisions on a simple X-Y axis: job outcomes vs. total cost. Ben shows how late apps get worse on both, and why rankings (T20/T50) are a terrible proxy compared to ABA 509 employment data and real starting salaries.Big picture: the law-school industrial complex is wobbling. With loan policy shifts and banks caring about ROI, many mid-tier schools will struggle, full-rides will tighten, and the minimum viable LSAT will creep up—making patience and a higher score the best financial move.Ben walks through a real listener case study (151→159) and outlines the tradeoffs: rush a 159–162 now, or take months to reach 165–168+ and unlock better schools and far better aid. He also shares practical LOR tips—get them on file early, ask more people than you need, and don’t over-submit.We close with what’s next: a free class on “How to Study Smart for the January LSAT (and beyond)” on Wednesday, Nov 19, plus a Black Friday promo preview. If you want big-law options or low-debt public-interest paths, the play is simple: wait, study right, and apply with your best LSAT.👉 Find everything at linktr.ee/heyfuturelawyer

👉 Find everything at linktr.ee/heyfuturelawyerIn this episode, Ben Parker and Madeline Jesson dive deep into the science of learning — and what actually works when it comes to improving on the LSAT and beyond. Drawing from the research-backed insights of Make It Stick: The Science of Successful Learning, they unpack how most people study the wrong way, why “feeling productive” isn’t the same as learning, and what to do instead.Ben and Madeline break down the book’s key takeaways — from why learning should feel effortful, to how spaced repetition and active recall beat re-reading or highlighting every time. They connect each principle directly to LSAT prep, explaining how common traps like aesthetic note-taking or passive review waste time, and how strategies like deliberate practice, prediction, and consistent engagement actually build comprehension and endurance.Throughout, they challenge popular LSAT myths, arguing that real progress doesn’t come from memorizing question types or tricks, but from improving your ability to read and think critically. For anyone serious about score growth — or mastering any complex skill — this conversation delivers a grounded, no-nonsense roadmap for studying smarter, not just harder.

In this episode, Ben welcomes Madeline back after her brief break from the podcast to catch up on law school life and dive deep into what it’s really like surviving 1L. Madeline talks about the initial adrenaline of starting law school fading into the grind of outlines, memos, and long nights—especially as she works through her first big legal writing assignment on the “attractive nuisance doctrine.” She and Ben discuss how hard it can be to stay motivated once the novelty wears off and how law school, like LSAT prep, ultimately rewards consistency over bursts of enthusiasm.The two go on to explore why so many people fail to study for the LSAT seriously—despite being able to commit to grueling law school workloads—and what that says about human nature, discipline, and delayed consequences. From there, Ben and Madeline get into law firm recruiting trends, the growing absurdity of BigLaw timelines, and how regional markets like Kentucky operate completely differently from New York or D.C.Later, the conversation takes a sharp turn into controversial LSAT topics: grade inflation, A+ GPAs, and why accommodations and remote testing may be distorting score distributions. Ben doesn’t hold back on his critique of extra-time policies, while Madeline offers thoughtful pushback and perspective from her own legal education. The episode wraps with Madeline reflecting on preparing for finals season, how LSAT habits translate to law school success, and why consistency and foresight beat last-minute cramming every time.👉 Find everything at linktr.ee/heyfuturelawyer

In this episode, Ben Parker kicks off with an update on law school admissions data, revealing a massive 31.6% surge in applicants and what that means for 2026’s “worst cycle ever.” He explains why higher applicant volume paired with fewer applications per person creates a uniquely competitive cycle and warns listeners to apply broadly—or better yet, wait until next year. Ben also discusses which undergraduate majors tend to score highest and lowest on the LSAT (based on LSAC data), why correlation doesn’t equal causation, and why he rejects the idea that philosophy or logic-heavy majors inherently make you better at the LSAT.From there, he dives into deeper reflections on LSAT performance, effort, and self-deception. He calls out the myth of “bad test takers,” arguing most low scorers simply don’t put in consistent effort or lack reading discipline. Ben explores how reading comprehension, not logic, drives success, and goes so far as to say that people scoring below 150 are often “functionally illiterate”—not as an insult, but as a wake-up call to the skills that law school actually demands. He introduces his company’s upcoming LSAT guarantee program, explains how it will only reward students who genuinely do the work, and critiques “toxic positivity” in modern LSAT culture for shielding students from the truth about effort and accountability.Later, Ben discusses why last-minute LSAT tutoring rarely works, the importance of giving yourself multiple test attempts, and LSAT score variance (the real “test day drop” myth). He explains why Hey Future Lawyer is now focusing marketing toward next-cycle students rather than November testers. He then answers a Reddit question about whether different LSATs vary in difficulty, debunking that idea by explaining LSAC’s scaling system and how “harder” or “easier” sections balance out.The episode closes with two meaty segments: first, Ben reads an in-depth listener email about student loan reform and the political implications of the new federal loan limits—offering a nuanced breakdown of how the changes might pressure bottom-tier law schools and reshape the industry. Finally, he critiques a listener’s personal statement, analyzing line by line what works, what doesn’t, and why real-life action is far more persuasive than abstract reflection. His ultimate message: results matter more than rhetoric—both in essays and in life.👉 Find everything at linktr.ee/heyfuturelawyer

In this episode, Ben Parker dives into the latest LSAC applicant data showing a massive 32.9% year-over-year increase in law school applications—making the 2026 admissions cycle the most competitive in history. He explains why more applicants and stagnant class sizes mean that even strong candidates will find it harder to secure spots and scholarships. Ben also breaks down LSAT score distribution trends, revealing that while top scores are slightly up in raw numbers, the overall percentile landscape is tightening.Ben then turns his attention to the misinformation epidemic on Reddit, dissecting a post that claimed to offer “tips” for earning a T25 full scholarship. He explains why much of the advice circulating online is dangerously misleading, emphasizing that law school admissions remain overwhelmingly numbers-driven, with LSAT and GPA medians determining nearly everything. Through a humorous yet blunt critique, he reminds listeners that “exceptions don’t disprove rules” and urges applicants to prioritize real prep over Reddit myths.The episode also features a live personal statement “shred”, where Ben reviews a listener’s essay in real time—critiquing structure, tone, and strategy. He advises applicants to focus on demonstrating competence, maturity, and initiative, rather than trauma-dumping or rehashing undergrad experiences. The segment highlights how to transform an average essay into one that communicates strength, purpose, and readiness for law school.Ben closes by reaffirming his belief that most applicants don’t take the LSAT seriously enough—and that disciplined study, not short timelines or magical thinking, separates high scorers from the rest. As always, he keeps it brutally honest, mixing humor, data, and tough love to help future law students cut through the noise and make smarter admissions decisions.All my LSAT resources, classes, and free guides: linktr.ee/heyfuturelawyer

In this episode, Ben Parker dives into one of the most controversial debates in LSAT prep: the formal logic approach versus the intuitive reading approach. Ben argues that most LSAT students are taught to overcomplicate the test by memorizing symbols, contrapositives, and diagramming rules, when in reality the LSAT is a test of reading comprehension—not logic. Using real Reddit exchanges, LSAT examples, and hilarious analogies (from sheep and mammals to group projects gone wrong), he breaks down why conditional reasoning is far simpler than most test-takers think.Ben explains that confusion on the LSAT doesn’t come from misunderstanding “logic” but from misunderstanding language. He discusses how diagramming became an LSAT habit leftover from the old Logic Games section and why it’s now holding people back. Instead of translating the test into symbols, Ben advocates for reading to understand—what he calls the “intuitive way”—and offers practical advice for how to apply this mindset across Logical Reasoning and Reading Comp.The episode also explores why people get defensive about this topic, the LSAT industry’s role in perpetuating unnecessary complexity, and how Hey Future Lawyer’s philosophy differs from traditional prep companies. Ben closes with a look ahead at how he’s building a better LSAT prep system—one that treats students like intelligent readers, not logic robots—and invites listeners to submit their personal statements for live feedback on the show.👉 https://linktr.ee/heyfuturelawyer

In this episode, Ben dives into the upcoming Jumpstart Your January LSAT prep package, why it might be a smart move for students targeting the January LSAT, and how poor planning around prep timelines hurts applicants. He highlights the financial stakes tied to LSAT scores and reminds listeners that applying late in the cycle often costs both admissions chances and scholarship money.The conversation then shifts to the student loan changes shaking legal education. Ben lays out why many lower-ranked law schools may be on the brink of closure, arguing that private lenders won’t bankroll institutions with poor job placement and bar passage outcomes. He critiques Santa Clara’s recent “scholarship” strategy, showing how it ignores the reality of living expenses and reveals the deeper cracks in the system.Ben also shares insights from the Miami LSAC Forum, reflecting on the culture of bad admissions advice, the illusion of prestige, and the importance of focusing on substance over appearances. He warns students against banking on transfers and explains why investing in the LSAT is a far more reliable route.Finally, the episode touches on Texas’ push to move away from ABA accreditation, the record-breaking 47,000 registrations for the November LSAT, and listener Q&As about scoring plateaus and running out of practice tests. With his usual mix of blunt realism and humor, Ben breaks down the shifting landscape of law school admissions and LSAT prep.👉 https://linktr.ee/heyfuturelawyer

This episode opens with updates from Hey Future Lawyer, including a free upcoming LSAT session and the start of the October group. Then, Ben and Madeline dive into life as a 1L. Madeline shares that while law school has its challenges, it feels more like a marathon than a sprint, with manageable ups and downs. The conversation highlights the importance of stamina, time management, and avoiding excuses—parallels that carry over directly to LSAT prep.From there, the discussion moves into the realities of legal careers, illustrated with an anecdote about the demanding nature of big law. Ben emphasizes the trap of procrastination and wasted screen time, urging listeners to take responsibility for their LSAT prep rather than rationalizing avoidance. Both he and Madeline agree that consistent effort—even small increments of daily progress—pays off over time.The episode then shifts to admissions data, starting with Belmont Law’s 50% application increase and LSAT registration numbers that suggest another competitive cycle. They warn against overinterpreting single data points but agree that the general trend is toward rising difficulty in admissions. The pair stress that applying early and with strong numbers is crucial, cautioning against rushing an application when waiting a cycle could mean better schools and better scholarships.Finally, Ben and Madeline field listener emails, covering topics like how to explain gaps on a resume, whether score preview is worth buying, and the trade-offs between applying early versus waiting for a higher LSAT score. They critique the LSAC’s practices around score preview and release dates, and they warn against overreliance on Reddit or TikTok admissions advice. The message is clear: strong numbers and solid essays win, but self-awareness and patience are just as important for long-term legal career success.https://linktr.ee/heyfuturelawyer

In this episode, Ben Parker breaks down why the 2026 law school admissions cycle is shaping up to be one of the most chaotic ever. Applications are way up, LSAT scores are rising across the board, and competition for top schools is reaching unprecedented levels. Students will need higher scores and stronger resumes than ever before to stand out.A major factor is the recent elimination of GradPLUS loans, which previously allowed students to borrow unlimited amounts for law school. Ben explains how this change disrupts the entire system: lower-tier schools lose their financial lifeline, mid-tier schools face shrinking enrollments, and even elite schools must rethink scholarship strategies. While wealthy institutions with billion-dollar endowments may weather the storm, many smaller schools simply won’t survive.Ben doesn’t hold back in calling out schools like California Western, digging into their financials to show how quickly they could collapse without endless federal loan dollars. He predicts that 20–30 law schools could close in the near future, with even more disappearing over the next decade. In his view, this contraction may actually be good for students, since fewer people will end up saddled with crushing debt for degrees that don’t pay off.Alongside these big-picture predictions, the episode also features practical LSAT advice. Ben shares why running out of time is normal for test-takers in the 150s, why you shouldn’t stress about finishing every question, and why starting LSAT prep early is the smartest move you can make. He also reads listener emails, including one student who jumped from a 153 to a 166 in just four months, proving that disciplined prep can transform outcomes even in this brutal cycle.To wrap things up, Ben critiques a listener’s personal statement. He praises the strong start, offers targeted edits to cut fluff and highlight achievements, and explains how to avoid drawing attention to weaknesses like resume gaps. His blunt but constructive feedback makes the essay far stronger and offers lessons for anyone writing their own law school personal statement.https://linktr.ee/heyfuturelawyer

In this episode, Ben Parker and Madeline Jesson dive deep into the realities of law school, LSAT preparation, and how the two intersect. Madeline, now a 1L on a full scholarship, shares her first impressions of law school workload, time management, and how her LSAT skills have translated into her studies. Ben and Madeline explore whether certain reasoning abilities are truly teachable, or if some people simply “have it or don’t” when it comes to logic and comprehension.They also connect LSAT logic to legal doctrines, especially how conditions, intent, and legal elements appear in torts and criminal law. Madeline explains how law professors rarely frame concepts as “sufficient” or “necessary conditions,” but LSAT training helps her interpret the language more clearly. The two discuss the broader debate over LSAT question types, shortcuts, and heuristics, concluding that true success comes down to strong reading and reasoning rather than over-categorization.From there, the conversation shifts toward the financial side of law school. Ben and Madeline tackle the controversial new federal loan changes — what they mean for lower-tier law schools, student debt, and the predatory cycle of borrowing. They argue that studying for the LSAT is the highest ROI investment a student can make, often worth thousands of dollars per hour in scholarship value, compared to the crushing mathematics of student loans.Finally, they answer a listener’s question about retaking the LSAT after a disappointing test day performance, emphasizing strategy, timing, and the importance of applying early in the law school cycle. Madeline shares her own admissions experience, including acceptances to UVA and Georgetown, and reflects on how applying early helped her gain opportunities that might not have been possible later in the cycle. Together, they reinforce that a high LSAT score and early, strategic applications remain the most powerful tools for future law students.Explore all our LSAT resources here: linktr.ee/heyfuturelawyer

This episode kicks off with a reminder that law school applications open on Labor Day, making it the perfect time to cut through the noise surrounding admissions. Ben highlights how online forums—particularly Reddit’s r/lawschooladmissions—often spread misinformation. He critiques the echo chamber of anxious applicants who exaggerate the difficulty of getting into law school and perpetuate myths about what really matters in the admissions process.From there, the conversation turns to one of the biggest misconceptions: applying early doesn’t matter. Ben strongly disagrees, pointing out that both schools and consultants downplay the importance of timing for their own incentives. He explains why November is already late in the cycle and how LSAT variance means that relying on a single sitting can tank an otherwise strong application. Numbers—specifically LSAT and GPA—remain the driving force in admissions, no matter what law schools or consultants claim.The episode also challenges the narrative that soft factors like work experience, essays, or “employability” outweigh the numbers. While it’s true that being a weirdo can sink you, Ben makes clear that most applicants are not finished products—and law schools don’t expect them to be. Instead, what matters is showing potential backed by LSAT and GPA medians, which directly tie into rankings, bar passage, and employment outcomes.Finally, Ben critiques a real personal statement submitted by a listener. He stresses that law schools don’t care about your “why law” story or your childhood insecurities; they want to see evidence that you’ll kick ass in law school and beyond. Essays should frame applicants as strong, capable, and compelling—not as works in progress.https://linktr.ee/HeyFutureLawyer

In this episode, Ben dives deep into LSAT Reading Comprehension, breaking down why it isn’t about gimmicks or shortcuts—it’s about real understanding. He explains how dense, poorly written passages trip students up and why slowing down, reading actively, and focusing on comprehension will transform your score. Ben also gives actionable tips like using three guiding questions for active reading, identifying the main point as your “North Star,” and resisting the temptation to skim or over-highlight.Beyond RC strategy, Ben shares insights into mindset and preparation. He stresses that success on the LSAT isn’t about innate brilliance but about perspective, accountability, and consistent practice. Using analogies from sports and his own lacrosse days, he illustrates how you “win in practice, not on game day.” He also warns against lazy shortcuts like chasing thesis statements or reading between the lines—what matters is what the text actually says.The episode rounds out with a listener email about burnout, where Ben offers practical advice on balancing study time, prioritizing accuracy over speed, and avoiding exhaustion while juggling life commitments. He finishes with a candid critique of common mistakes in law school personal statements—like clichés, resume dumps, or passive trauma narratives—and emphasizes writing essays that show real action and growth.📌 Find more free LSAT help and resources here: linktr.ee/heyfuturelawyer

In this episode, Ben unpacks LSAC’s recent announcement suspending the online LSAT in mainland China due to rampant cheating scandals. He explains how organized companies were openly selling proxy test-taking services for thousands of dollars, why that creates long-term risks for students, and what it could mean for the future of online testing. Ben also speculates on whether this move could eventually push the LSAT back to being fully in-person.From there, the episode turns into a mailbag, answering pressing LSAT questions from students. Topics include whether a 20-point score jump in a month is realistic, whether October or November is the better retake date, and how to handle regrets about not applying for accommodations. He offers direct advice on score preview, rushing applications, and managing study anxiety.The episode closes with practical reminders, including a PSA to disable Grammarly before the LSAT writing section. It’s a mix of breaking LSAT news, strategy insights, and straightforward answers to common test prep dilemmas.🎧 Listen to this episode and more by visiting linktr.ee/HeyFutureLawyer.

In this August 2025 LSAT recap, Ben Parker breaks down the test in a way you won’t find anywhere else—focusing on actionable strategy, not internet clickbait. He tackles the curve myth, explains why “the test is getting harder” is an illusion, and exposes the truth about LSAC’s heavy reuse of old questions. You’ll learn why obsessing over predicted topics is a waste of time, why human psychology skews test-day perception, and how to avoid the post-LSAT freakout.Ben also explains why you should always register for consecutive LSATs, how to think about your score range realistically, and the massive difference law school rank makes in career outcomes. You’ll get his take on proctors (in-person vs. remote), the false security blanket of topic predictions, and why some study habits are pure “goofball” territory. Finally, he answers listener questions on score withdrawal strategy, mental fatigue during full PTs, and timing your law school applications for maximum results.If you’re serious about law school admissions, this is required listening. 🎯 Study with us & join a free class → https://linktr.ee/HeyFutureLawyer

In this episode, Ben returns to the mic after a short break to dive into the ramifications of the newly enacted "Big, Beautiful Bill," a sweeping legislative package signed into law during Trump’s second term. Rather than explore the bill's political implications, Ben focuses squarely on what the bill means for law school access, student loans, scholarships, and legal education's return on investment (ROI). His central thesis is blunt: most law schools were already a poor investment, and the changes this bill brings may finally end the harmful cycle of overborrowing for underwhelming outcomes.Ben explains that the bill eliminates Grad PLUS loans and imposes a federal borrowing cap of $50,000 per year (up to $200,000 total) for law and medical students. This effectively prevents students from using federal loans to finance overpriced, low-ROI law schools. He predicts that private lenders will step in only for students attending top-tier schools with proven career outcomes. This new reality could collapse the tuition-subsidized scholarship model, where weaker students paid full freight so stronger candidates could attend for free.Throughout the episode, Ben critiques the legal education system for enabling predatory pricing by bad law schools propped up by government-backed loans. He argues that while fewer students may now be able to attend law school, this is a feature, not a bug. He contends that the new system will filter out students who never should have gone in the first place — many of whom would graduate with insurmountable debt and limited job prospects.He also addresses the criticism that these changes reduce access for first-gen and low-income students. Ben counters that anyone with a high LSAT score can still attend law school debt-free, as long as they target schools that offer full-ride scholarships. In his view, the real injustice was the illusion that all law schools were created equal — a narrative that lured many students into financial traps. He closes by encouraging critical thinking over credentialism and opens the door for respectful, data-backed debate.https://linktr.ee/heyfuturelawyer

In this mailbag episode, Ben answers a wide range of questions from LSAT students, diving into common struggles like score stagnation, timing issues, and study habits. He emphasizes that untimed score improvements are normal, but consistent mistakes under time pressure often come from rushing or passivity during the test. Ben encourages students to focus on intentional problem-solving rather than guessing or relying on "comfortable" answers, which he argues leads to ineffective learning.He addresses issues like getting stuck between two answer choices, advocating for making decisions based on articulated reasoning rather than vibes. He points out that LSAT success hinges on clarity of thought and active engagement with the material—not just exposure to questions. Ben also reiterates the importance of treating the LSAT like a free-response test and warns against the trap of passive review, where students don’t fully absorb what they got wrong.Later, he tackles timing concerns, particularly for students with accommodations. His advice: timing problems are usually comprehension problems in disguise. The way to speed up is by deeply understanding the questions, not by rushing.Want help figuring out why your score is stuck? Join Ben’s live classes or start self-studying with the full curriculum at HeyFutureLawyer.com. You'll get on-demand help for every LSAT question and access to the same strategies discussed in this episode.

In this episode—recorded just days before heading off on a honeymoon—Ben dives deep into the economic and ethical realities of law school costs, especially for students offered conditional scholarships. He walks through the implications of taking partial versus full scholarships, with a heavy emphasis on understanding law school grading curves and the potential for losing aid due to GPA requirements. Using Chapman Law School as a case study, he breaks down employment stats, debt load projections, and the questionable return on investment many students face.Ben also takes a strong stand on accommodations for the LSAT, defending his controversial position with his usual mix of data, directness, and dark humor. He critiques the current accessibility landscape, arguing that standardization is, by design, meant to sort—not level—a playing field. Expect blunt takes on everything from ADHD accommodations to the American Disabilities Act.The episode closes with a candid, detailed listener email about law school admissions strategy. Ben provides practical feedback on GPA addenda, political involvement, branding for public interest careers, and how law schools really view applicants with activist resumes. As always, his focus is on outcomes and cutting through the noise that surrounds law school decision-making.Explore our full set of free resources, podcast episodes, live classes, and more at 👉 https://linktr.ee/HeyFutureLawyer