Santa Cruz County Transit and Transportation Agency Meetings - Audio Tracks

The Commission approved a resolution authorizing Executive Director Christensen to execute a Right-of- Entry Agreement with the City of Santa Cruz for a temporary pedestrian and bicycle trail between Seabright Avenue and 7th Avenue, and to use adjacent areas of the Santa Cruz Branch Rail Line corridor for construction staging to support the Murray Street Bridge Seismic Retrofit and Barrier Replacement Project.The agreement is subject to approval by the RTC’s contracted railroad operator, Saint Paul & Pacific Railroad, a subsidiary of Progressive Rail, Inc.The Commission directed staff to continue facilitating reviews and approvals by Progressive Rail for both the temporary use of the railroad bridge and the staging area.This temporary trail will provide a vital connection for community members to businesses in the Seabright and Harbor neighborhoods during construction of the Murray Street Bridge Project, which has an estimated duration of two years.RTC Documents are here:https://www.sccrtc.org/meetings/regional-transportation-commission/agendas/Original video is here:https://youtu.be/J4cE6Pz_U54?si=twHZsN6hTylIiwXY

The Commission received a presentation on two strategies for the implementation of the construction component of the Highway 1 Freedom Boulevard to State Park Drive Auxiliary Lanes and Bus on Shoulder, and Coastal Rail Trail Segment 12 Project. Final design and right of way is underway on the project which is scheduled to be construction-ready in fall 2026, and a decision is needed on which agency will serve as the implementing agency for the construction component of the project. Serving as the implementing agency for construction of the project entails advertising, awarding, and administering the construction contract.RTC staff and Caltrans developed two strategies for implementation of the project – a hybrid implementation by Caltrans (highway portion) and the RTC (rail trail portion), or have the RTC implement the entire project.The Commission approved the Caltrans/RTC hybrid implementation which would require splitting the project into two construction contracts. Staff has worked with Caltrans to develop a plan to split the two projects and will bring more information on the feasibility of the split to the Commission at a subsequent meeting for approval, as well as recommendations for entering into the needed Cooperative Agreements for the construction component, awarding and amending of construction management and design contracts to adopt plans, specifications, and engineer’s estimate for the project, and to add two additional staff to the RTC’s Capital Projects department.RTC Documents are here:https://www.sccrtc.org/meetings/regional-transportation-commission/agendas/Original video is here:https://youtu.be/J4cE6Pz_U54?si=twHZsN6hTylIiwXY

The Commission received input from the public and approved the Fiscal Years (FY) 2025/26-2029/30 Measure D five-year programs of projects for regional projects funded by Measure D, and Community Bridges Lift Line projects. Measure D regional projects include Active Transportation/Rail Trail, Highway Corridors, Rail Corridor preservation, Highway 17 Wildlife Crossing, and San Lorenzo Valley-Highway 9 Corridor Improvements.The approved Measure D 5-year plan adds funding to projects previously approved in the plan and shifts funds between years to match project delivery schedules and project expenditure needs for a variety of projects in the Measure D Active Transportation, Highway and Rail categories.Some of the Measure D regional projects under construction currently and into the next year include Highway 1 Auxiliary Lanes and Bus-on-Shoulder between Bay/Porter and State Park, including a new bicycle/pedestrian overcrossing at Mar Vista Avenue, and Segment 5 of the Coastal Rail Trail from Wilder Ranch to Davenport on the Santa Cruz County North Coast. No new projects were programmed funds.Community Bridges Lift Line will continue to use its Measure D funds for three additional drivers, to support expanded weekday and weekend paratransit service, on vehicle operation costs, and on its new operations facility.The approved 5-year plans for spending Measure D funds are on the RTC website: www.sccrtc.org/move .RTC Documents are here:https://www.sccrtc.org/meetings/regional-transportation-commission/agendas/Original video is here:https://youtu.be/J4cE6Pz_U54?si=twHZsN6hTylIiwXY

Adoption of the Consolidated Grants Program and Regional Transportation Improvement ProgramFollowing consideration of public and advisory committee input, the Commission adopted the 2025 Consolidated Grants Program and the 2026 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP), approving road, bike, pedestrian and transit projects to receive the region’s anticipated formula share of certain state and federal funds totaling approximately $15 million. RTC staff used metrics to evaluate the projects that align with regional, state, and federal goals in the areas of access, safety, infrastructure condition, system performance and reliability, sustainability, resiliency, health, equity, and deliverability.Projects that received funding include:• Coastal Rail Trail Segments 8-9 and 10-11• Multimodal Projects on Soquel Drive, Freedom Blvd, and Bay Ave in Capitola• Santa Cruz METRO 90X express bus service between Santa Cruz and Watsonville using the new redbus-only shoulders on Highway 1• Pavement maintenance, roadway rehabilitation and traffic calming projects on local roadsthroughout the county• New and upgraded bike/pedestrian facilities projects in Capitola, Scotts Valley, and WatsonvilleRTC Documents are here:https://www.sccrtc.org/meetings/regional-transportation-commission/agendas/Original video is here:https://youtu.be/J4cE6Pz_U54?si=twHZsN6hTylIiwXY

Caltrans ReportRTC Documents are here:https://www.sccrtc.org/meetings/regional-transportation-commission/agendas/Original video is here:https://youtu.be/J4cE6Pz_U54?si=twHZsN6hTylIiwXY

Director's ReportRTC Documents are here:https://www.sccrtc.org/meetings/regional-transportation-commission/agendas/Original video is here:https://youtu.be/J4cE6Pz_U54?si=twHZsN6hTylIiwXY

Meeting with California Transportation CommissionCommissioners Fred Keeley, Manu Koenig, and Eduardo Montesino met with California Transportation Commissioner (CTC) Carl Guardino and staff from both agencies on October 20, 2025, regarding the Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 6 grant award for the Coastal Rail Trail Segments 8 through 11 project.The meeting was held to discuss potential options for delivery of the Segments 8 through 11 project in light of significant construction cost escalation since the time of the original grant award. Commissioners inquired whether the RTC could retain the full Cycle 6 ATP grant amount while reducing the project scope to phase Segment 11 to a later date. Segment 11 represents approximately 2.5 miles of the total 6.7-mile project, and the CTC indicated that a one-third reduction in length is significant and would be unlikely to retain the full funding award. CTC staff said that they could still consider this request but would need to review a side-by-side comparison of project benefits between the original project scope and the proposed reduced-scope project. CTC staff confirmed that no additional ATP or other program funding is available to address the unprecedented cost escalation affecting transportation infrastructure projects statewide. CTC staff also expressed an openness to creative delivery approaches, such as an interim trail, that could achieve cost savings.RTC Documents are here:https://www.sccrtc.org/meetings/regional-transportation-commission/agendas/Original video is here:https://youtu.be/J4cE6Pz_U54?si=twHZsN6hTylIiwXY

Q&A part 2 following Part 5 - Coastal Trail Project Delivery

Q&A - part 1 - Coastal Trail Project Delivery

The same as Part 5 but without the long introduction and project background. OverviewCoastal Rail Trail Segments 8-11 face significant funding and delivery challenges.Escalating costs and funding gaps threaten project timelines and scope.Multiple phasing and scope reduction options analyzed; none fully close the funding gap.$19.5M federal RAISE grant and $20.5M Safe Streets for All grant (pending) are key funding sources.Measure D sales tax is critical for leveraging state and federal funds, but is insufficient for full buildout.Project delivery is at risk due to strict grant deadlines and limited new funding opportunities.Project Introduction and Recusal for Conflict of InterestCoastal Rail Trail Segments 8-11 project delivery discussed.Chair Montecito recused due to conflict of interest.Planning grant for Watsonville circulation pursued, supporting previous Reconnecting Communities grant application.Focus on future project planning in City of Watsonville.Project Overview, Funding Success, and ChallengesCoastal Rail Trail is a 32-mile multi-use path from Davenport to Pajaro.Project divided into segments; current focus on segments 8–11 (Santa Cruz to Aptos).Project approval and environmental phase began in 2020; construction scheduled for 2027.Construction expected to take 2–4 years; significant time spent on environmental review and design.Recent efforts focus on cost reduction and project delivery strategies due to funding shortfalls.Cost Escalation, Funding Gaps, and Phasing OptionsValue engineering analysis and MOU with Roaring Camp completed to reduce track relocation costs.Secured $19.5M federal RAISE grant; City of Santa Cruz applied for $20.5M Safe Streets for All grant.Coastal Rail Trail segments 8–11 require additional funding for final design and construction by 2027.Existing grants do not cover cost increases; new state and federal funding is scarce and competitive.Project phasing and scope reduction options analyzed, but even minimal reductions exceed available Measure D revenues.Financial Scenarios, Grant Assumptions, and Feasibility AnalysisFuture project phases require funding; no identified source yet.Assumed minimum local match is 20% of project cost; higher match increases competitiveness.Option C funds 1.5 of 6.5 miles with Measure D, leaving ~$20–21M for future phases or matching.Financial analysis excludes potential $20M Safe Streets for All grant.Ongoing cost tracking; current funding gap addressed via Consolidated Grant Program application, with decisions expected in November.Distribution of Funds and Project Wrap-UpMajority of funds distributed to city and county of Santa Cruz.Significant portion allocated to corridor maintenance.Some funding dedicated to city of Watsonville.Project concept report used for trail alignment development in Watsonville.Regional portion of North Coast Trail under development.

OverviewCoastal Rail Trail Segments 8-11 face significant funding and delivery challenges.Escalating costs and funding gaps threaten project timelines and scope.Multiple phasing and scope reduction options analyzed; none fully close the funding gap.$19.5M federal RAISE grant and $20.5M Safe Streets for All grant (pending) are key funding sources.Measure D sales tax is critical for leveraging state and federal funds, but is insufficient for full buildout.Project delivery is at risk due to strict grant deadlines and limited new funding opportunities.Project Introduction and Recusal for Conflict of InterestCoastal Rail Trail Segments 8-11 project delivery discussed.Chair Montecito recused due to conflict of interest.Planning grant for Watsonville circulation pursued, supporting previous Reconnecting Communities grant application.Focus on future project planning in City of Watsonville.Project Overview, Funding Success, and ChallengesCoastal Rail Trail is a 32-mile multi-use path from Davenport to Pajaro.Project divided into segments; current focus on segments 8–11 (Santa Cruz to Aptos).Project approval and environmental phase began in 2020; construction scheduled for 2027.Construction expected to take 2–4 years; significant time spent on environmental review and design.Recent efforts focus on cost reduction and project delivery strategies due to funding shortfalls.Cost Escalation, Funding Gaps, and Phasing OptionsValue engineering analysis and MOU with Roaring Camp completed to reduce track relocation costs.Secured $19.5M federal RAISE grant; City of Santa Cruz applied for $20.5M Safe Streets for All grant.Coastal Rail Trail segments 8–11 require additional funding for final design and construction by 2027.Existing grants do not cover cost increases; new state and federal funding is scarce and competitive.Project phasing and scope reduction options analyzed, but even minimal reductions exceed available Measure D revenues.Financial Scenarios, Grant Assumptions, and Feasibility AnalysisFuture project phases require funding; no identified source yet.Assumed minimum local match is 20% of project cost; higher match increases competitiveness.Option C funds 1.5 of 6.5 miles with Measure D, leaving ~$20–21M for future phases or matching.Financial analysis excludes potential $20M Safe Streets for All grant.Ongoing cost tracking; current funding gap addressed via Consolidated Grant Program application, with decisions expected in November.Distribution of Funds and Project Wrap-UpMajority of funds distributed to city and county of Santa Cruz.Significant portion allocated to corridor maintenance.Some funding dedicated to city of Watsonville.Project concept report used for trail alignment development in Watsonville.Regional portion of North Coast Trail under development.

OverviewCaltrans announced the 2026-27 Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program is open for applications, with $17.5M available for sustainable communities planning, $1.5M for strategic partnership planning, and $3M for transit partnerships.Multiple emergency and planned infrastructure projects are underway, including drainage repairs, retaining wall replacements, and erosion control, with key completion dates in December 2025 and Spring 2026.Ongoing efforts to improve temporary traffic signals and minimize disruption for travelers and cyclists.RTC is preparing grant applications for corridor planning and resiliency studies, including updates to the Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan and potential bus-on-shoulder studies.Caltrans Grant Program Announcement and DetailsCaltrans 2026-27 Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program applications open; due September 21.Total funding: $17.5M for Sustainable Communities, $1.5M for Strategic Partnership Planning, $3M for Strategic Partnerships in Transit.Project Updates: Emergency Repairs and Traffic ManagementDrainage repair and retaining wall emergency project underway between Prospect and Lorenzo, south of Boulder Creek.Temporary signal initially caused delays due to fixed timing and extra cyclist time; reprogrammed with traffic sensor and push button for cyclists.Construction completion anticipated December 2024.Drainage and erosion control project on Highway 9 at 17 locations between Bin Le Mans and near 935 intersection.Second temporary signal for Highway 9 project planned for spring 2026; signals will not operate simultaneously.Commissioner Q&A: Ramp Closures and Design IssuesBay Porter off-ramp closure dates unavailable; follow-up pending.Paper Avenue ramps have a design issue under review with Caltrans.Unidentified elements in design plans caused a pause and redesign consideration.Ramp closure delayed to avoid unnecessary closure without a solution.RTC Grant Applications and Corridor Planning DiscussionRTC plans to submit a Caltrans Sustainable Planning Grant application to update the Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan.Plan update covers Soquel Drive/Freedom Boulevard, Highway 1, and Santa Cruz Branch Rail Line.Bus-on-shoulder extensions and other improvements may be included in the plan update.RTC previously awarded $128.7 million from the Solutions for Congested Corridors Program in June.Additional planning grants under consideration include studies on branch line resiliency at more locations.Public Engagement, Town Hall, and Closing RemarksPublic town hall on state of roads scheduled for November 13th, 6 p.m., focusing on District 5, Santa Cruz County, San Lorenzo Valley, Highway 9.Commissioner Keaton requested a briefing on PRT and offered to help coordinate a meeting with Carl Gardena from CTC regarding ongoing issues.These podcasts were taken from Community TV's original video. It is available here:https://communitytv.org/watch/government-demand/

Director's report.These podcasts were taken from Community TV's original video. It is available here:https://communitytv.org/watch/government-demand/

The RTC’s appointments to the Coastal Rail Council.The CRCC is a coalition of transportation agencies and stakeholders along California's Central Coast.These podcasts were taken from Community TV's original video. It is available here:https://communitytv.org/watch/government-demand/

Commissioner reports.These podcasts were taken from Community TV's original video. It is available here:https://communitytv.org/watch/government-demand/

Action ItemsCom. Clark Provide Updated Interim Trail Cost Estimates Pull together updated information on interim trail cost estimates and bring it back to the commission.Com. Schiffrin Direct Staff to Seek Additional Funding Contact state and federal representatives and the CTC to appeal for necessary additional funding to complete trail segments 8-11.Com. Schiffrin Schedule Public Discussion on Rail Banking Ensure a report and public discussion on rail banking is included in the December meeting agenda, aligned with the rail feasibility study.OverviewCommission debated funding and scope for Coastal Rail Trail segments 8-11.Two competing motions: one to stay within current funding, another to seek additional funds.Key issues: rail banking, interim trail feasibility, and legal/financial constraints.Substitute motion to pursue staff recommendations and additional funding passed 7-4.Future public discussion on rail banking and trail options scheduled.Initial Motion: Funding Within Current ResourcesMotion authorized staff to coordinate with coastal rail trail sponsors and funding partners on segments 8–11.Directed staff to align project cost and scope with available funding.Instructed staff to work with municipal advisors and public finance to develop a financing plan for current and future expenditures.Required staff to present a public discussion on rail banking for the Santa Cruz branch rail line.Debate: Interim Trail, Legal Barriers, and Funding GapsCommission lacks legal authority to build interim trail without abandoning freight easement.Abandonment process could take 6 months to 5 years; strong opposition exists.$120 million in grants expire in 2027; timeline for trail construction uncertain.Existing funding is insufficient to build the trail; additional funds required.Motion to stay within current funding likely prevents trail construction in mid- and south-county.Substitute Motion: Seek Additional Funding & Staff RecommendationsApproved staff recommendations for coastal rail trail segments 8-11.Directed staff to collaborate with project sponsors and funding partners to reduce costs and deliver segments 8-11, including possible project scope modifications.Authorized executive director to initiate financing process for Measure D active transportation funds, including bond council services and a financing plan.Added direction for staff to contact state and federal representatives and the CTC to request additional funding for construction of segments 8-11.Clarifications: Rail Banking, Scope, and Public DiscussionCommission to receive rail banking report at December meeting.Rail banking discussion linked to potential abandonment of passenger rail.Interim trail funding likely sufficient, pending updated cost estimates and scope change approval.Rail banking process requires abandonment of freight easement; can be initiated by operator or other parties.Adverse abandonment and stakeholder agreement (e.g., Roaring Camp) are key issues for rail banking and trail development.Final Deliberations, Amendments, and VoteRail feasibility study scheduled for December; decision on passenger rail, funding, or rail banking to be made then.

OverviewSignificant funding gap for rail trail segments 8-11, with a shortfall of $17 million (projected cost: $137M + $88M = $225M; grants received: $120M).Measure D revenues are nearly fully committed, limiting future borrowing and project capacity.Urgency to secure additional funding by June 2027 to avoid losing $120M in outside grants.No contingency for litigation costs included in current budgets.Scaling back project scope may risk current grant funding and require state approval.Measure D Borrowing and Revenue ConstraintsBorrowing for active transportation projects uses only Measure D active transportation revenues, not full Measure D revenue.Other Measure D program areas remain unaffected and retain borrowing capacity under proposed scenarios.Project Cost Overruns and Funding Gaps for Segments 8-11Segments 10 and 11 over budget by $72 million; only $55 million projected funding, creating a shortfall.Measure D revenues cannot fully cover current project cost estimates; borrowing $55 million considered to partially fill gap.Future Measure D capacity to leverage state and federal funds will be significantly reduced after current funds are exhausted.Ongoing project cost estimates are subject to revision and updates are provided regularly.Grant Funding Risks, Deadlines, and Local ResponsibilitiesReceived $120 million in outside funding for rail trail segments 8–11.Funding deadline for construction is June 2027; must achieve 100% design and full funding by then.California Active Transportation Program does not cover cost overruns; local sponsors responsible for extra costs.Failure to meet deadlines risks loss of $120 million in grants.Additional construction funding needed to complete segments 8–11 and future segments 13–20.Efforts to Secure Additional Funding and Grant CompetitivenessApplied for two additional federal grants in 2023; received BUILD/RAISE grants in 2024.City of Santa Cruz submitted $20.5M Safe Streets for All grant for segments 8 and 9; decision expected December.Grant construction allocation request required by June 27, 2027; construction start not required by that date.Current Active Transportation Program cycle has significantly less funding than previous cycle.Projects are over budget; limited options and time remain to secure additional funding.Project Scope, Grant Compliance, and Feasibility ConcernsCalifornia Transportation Commission approval required for scope changes.Total cost for segments 8–11: $225 million (8–9: $88M, 10–11: $137M).Total grants received for segments 8–11: $120 million.Measure D revenue capacity estimated at $174–175 million; about $40 million obligated.No contingency funding allocated for litigation costs.No requirement to repay state design funds if projects not constructed.

9/4/25 SCCRTC P7a - Measure D Active Transportation Expenditures and FinancingOptions SummaryOverviewMeasure D active transportation projects are progressing faster than pay-as-you-go funding allows, necessitating new financing options.Over $150 million in state and federal funds have been leveraged for the coastal rail trail.Recent project completions include segment 7 to the Santa Cruz Wharf and new funding for segment 12.Cost estimates have increased due to material and escalation costs, creating a significant funding gap.Three financing scenarios were presented, with borrowing needs ranging from $12.5 million to $55 million.The commission will revisit recommendations and programming in November.Project Delivery Pace and Funding Needs for Coastal Rail TrailProvided update on coastal rail trail project funding needs.Measure D active transportation funds enable earlier project delivery but require financing options.Local Measure D funds leveraged over $150 million in state and federal funds for the 32-mile trail.Current discussion is informational; further recommendations expected in November.Project Updates, Segment Status, and Recent Funding AwardsRTC refines project cost estimates with sponsors for next five-year plan update.Coastal Rail Trail aims for full public access; segment 7 completed to Santa Cruz Wharf.SB1 grant awarded for Highway 1 State Park, Freedom Auxiliary Lane, and segment 12; construction funded.Segments 8-9 led by City of Santa Cruz; segments 10-11 led by County of Santa Cruz; segment 5 under construction, completion expected summer 2026.Segments 17-19 received $4.8M pre-construction funding; construction funding not yet identified.Cost Estimates, Funding Gaps, and Value EngineeringProject cost estimates for segments 8 and 11 updated in August 2025.Funding gap increased due to higher material unit costs, escalation, and schedule shifts.Value engineering analysis achieved cost savings, but escalation offset most savings.Secured additional $19.5 million funding; funding gap remains.Financing Scenarios, Borrowing Models, and Cash Flow AnalysisPresented three funding scenarios for Measure D active transportation: current, near-term, long-term.Current scenario based on adopted five-year plan, updated annually and as needed.Near-term needs include environmental mitigation for North Coast Rail Trail Segment 5 and additional design/right-of-way funding for Santa Cruz projects.Long-term commitments may require construction funding for Segments 8–11; commission committed to fully fund Segments 10 and 11 in April 2024.Summary, Next Steps, and Recommendations for Financing and Project DeliveryThree expenditure scenarios evaluated: current (~$40M), near-term (+$10M), long-term (~$80M).Borrowing needs: $12.5M (current), $23M (near-term), $55M (long-term/constrained).All scenarios assume ongoing corridor maintenance; trail maintenance only funded through FY28-29.Maximum borrowing ($55M) insufficient to fully fund segments 8–11A; multi-pronged funding approach required.Next steps: establish legal framework for debt, refine cash flow models, prepare financing plan for commission approval.

9/4/25 SCCRTC P6 - Hwy1 State Park to Bay-Porter Cost Overruns SummaryOverviewHighway 1 Segment 2 construction is about 45-50% complete.$7.7 million in additional costs identified; $1.5 million in savings found.Contingency fund increased from 5% to 10% due to unforeseen issues.Major cost drivers: design changes, unforeseen site conditions, tree removal, and public safety measures.Commissioners raised concerns about cost overruns, transparency, and future funding impacts.Highway 1 Project Status and PartnershipsRTC delivered Highway 1 corridor improvements, including Bus and Shoulder Auxiliary Lanes.Segment 1 (Soquel Drive to 41st Avenue) is nearly complete; Segment 2 (Bay Porter to State Park Drive) is under construction.Caltrans administers both segments; strong partnerships with public, county, and cities.Unforeseen in-field conflicts in Segment 2 since April 2024 required additional contingency funds.Segment 2 is approximately 50% complete; projected completion in fall 2026.Detailed Review of Project Challenges, Risks, and SavingsRevised stage construction 1A to avoid full Bay Porter Ave interchange closure; ramps built piecemeal to reduce public impact.Mar Vista pedestrian overcrossing alignment changed due to unmarked sewer lines; bridge relocated, affecting 25 of 45 plan sheets, avoiding 1+ year delay.Retaining wall construction required more tree removal than estimated, causing environmental hurdles, project delays, and added costs.Unforeseen site conditions (unsuitable materials, buried objects, utility conflicts) led to change orders and increased risk for stage 1B.Total additional work cost: $7.7M; project cost savings: $1.5M; original contingency: $4.1M; remaining work: $44M; 10% contingency needed.Commissioner Q&A: Cost Overruns, Design, and AccountabilityOriginal contingency was 5% (Caltrans standard), but future projects will use at least 10% due to increased risk and lessons learned.Further Commissioner Discussion: Environmental, Funding, and Public ConcernsTree removal cost: $679,000 due to additional access needs and unplanned trees.Ramp inefficiencies at Bay and Porter Street: $500,000; total related change order: $1.9 million; combined: $2.4 million.Current projected cost overruns: $7.7 million (gross), net after savings: $6.5 million; represents nearly 10% of original $80 million budget.Bridge landing shifted 5 feet inward to avoid utility conflict, causing design and construction impacts but minimal perceptible change for pedestrians.Vegetation removal mitigated by replanting at regulatory ratios (typically 3:1); replanting to occur at project end.

Caltrans Report