Claim OwnershipCreation Article Podcast
Subscribed: 209Played: 9,344
Subscribe
Description
Creation.com’s goal is to support the church at large in proclaiming the Truth
of the Bible and thus its Gospel message. We provide real-world answers to the
most asked questions in the vital area of origins laid out in the Book of
Genesis, where the Bible is most under attack today. That’s why we deliver this
podcast. It’s important that people on-the-go learn what God’s Word has to say,
and the arguments that creationists use to rely on the authority of Scripture
and make sense of secular science claims.
of the Bible and thus its Gospel message. We provide real-world answers to the
most asked questions in the vital area of origins laid out in the Book of
Genesis, where the Bible is most under attack today. That’s why we deliver this
podcast. It’s important that people on-the-go learn what God’s Word has to say,
and the arguments that creationists use to rely on the authority of Scripture
and make sense of secular science claims.
256 Episodes
Reverse
John K Reed and Shaun Doyle examine how the church’s 1,800-year consensus on a young earth was overturned by secular deep time concepts.
Can Christians accept an old earth? Logic shows deep time fits naturalism, not Christianity, creating fundamental conflicts. Shaun Doyle and John K Reed explore this.
Why reject biblical creation? A Scottish encounter reveals ignorance keeping people from God’s truth about origins.
Scientific certainty versus Scripture: Why “deep time” acceptance leads to biblical rejection. Software engineer Ari Takku’s transformation.
Congo’s hero shrew has an incredible spine that supports human weight but stays flexible. Scientists can’t explain how such engineering evolved naturally.
Why did the Creator walk in sandals? Explore how Jesus’ incarnation reshapes our view of humility, leadership, and God’s closeness to humanity.
Did Jesus believe in a young earth? Dr Carl Wieland and Dr Jonathan Sarfati examine claims that Christ was mistaken about science.
Why does science work? The field flourished under Christianity, not by accident. The foundations of scientific pursuits find their roots in biblical principles.
If nature inspires good design, could it be designed itself? This reflection on creativity and inspiration poses a deeper challenge.
Fresh wood and detectable carbon-14 in diamonds challenge claims of deep time, pointing instead to a much younger age consistent with the biblical timeline.
Darwin opposed human slavery but viewed it as natural in other species—exploring this contradiction and the true motives behind his evolutionary theory.
Folded rocks may look old, but evidence suggests they formed fast during the Flood—supporting the Bible over deep time.
Darwin rejected Genesis, miracles, and future judgment, but were his doubts based on evidence or emotion? Russell Grigg examines the flaws in his reasoning and worldview.
Polystrate fossils cut through rock layers, challenging deep time. Do they reveal a global flood? Paul Price examines the evidence geologists avoid.
Chesterton critiqued Darwinism for its speculative claims, moral dangers, and denial of miracles, offering a freer Christian worldview in response.
Skeptics try to stump us by citing passages in the Bible about God killing, but the Bible clearly presents God’s big picture plan for human beings.
Many people erroneously think that Charles Darwin was once blissfully content with the biblical explanation of origins. The truth is significantly otherwise.
The foundation of Christmas begins in Genesis, where sin and death entered the world, showing why we need the Savior born in Bethlehem—Jesus Christ.
Is Christmas pagan? Historical and biblical evidence says no. Dr Jonathan Sarfati reveals its roots in Christian liberty and Jewish traditions, celebrating Christ’s birth.
The origin of life reveals a “chicken-and-egg” dilemma for naturalism. Dr Batten examines why life’s complexity points to the need for an intelligent Creator.
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
United States
Sorry to say this, but this episode was terrible, and unfortunately it's not the only one of its kind. It's bad enough to use a computer voice droning on and on monotonously, rather than have an actual human read out the article. But the article is filled with technical terms that are not explained. Like what does "epistemological positivism" even mean? If you want to get your message across, make sure it is engaging and understandable.
Another great podcast! I love how you guys expose the illogical thinking of Peta and other evolution-based organisations.
there is not an episode that gets past me Creation.com helps in making sense in evolutionary chaos.👍❤️✝️ Owls are my favorite bird. This is a fantastic episode👍
"Since Charles Darwin published his "Origin of species" in 1959..." 1959? Come on guys, I know this is just a typo and you do know it's supposed to be 1859, so why aren't you checking each other's work before putting it out there? Anticreationists will question your intelligence and ability to comment on origins issues if you don't get basic facts right.
"the land of the third river... "? You mean the NAME of the third river. Lots of little mistakes like this suggest a second person should check the first person's work before proceeding.
Quoting from Ezekiel "I will cause death to come into these bones... "???? Surely it should be "breath" and not "death". Surely some spell-checking is called for when putting together a podcast, and especially when quoting the Word of God. I don't want to be critical, but yeah I think some constructive criticism is needed. As regards the content of the articles, I think that is great, and I am a long time supporter and consumer of CMI. (since 1992) So keep up the good work guys, but please tweak the issues with these podcasts. :)
From which country is the narrator of this article? His pronunciations here and there are so weird and unlike regular English, as if he goes out of his way to speak differently. I just heard him use the word "differ" repeatedly. But instead of saying "Di-fur" (emphasis on first syllable) he says "di-Fur" emphasis on second syllable. Many other words are weirdly pronounced too, like "sub-Sea-kwent" instead of "Sub-suh-kwent" (subsequent) and "in-Fur-runs" instead of "In-fur-runs" (inference). It's quite grating, and interferes with understanding. I've never heard mispronunciation like this before and can't match it to any particular country or region.
Commenting only on one grating aspect of the presenter's pronunciation and not the actual content... Why does he say "lon gages" instead of "long ages"? I've noticed other pronunciation anomalies too. His diction is otherwise clear, so why these grating anomalies?
I figured Obozo is an idiot but I never actually took it to heart on how much of a moron he really is. Flat earther, and we had one that occupied the White House.
a belief in alien life denies the work of Christ. When sin came into existence, sin infected everything. In Revelation, it states that there will be a new heaven and a new earth. Gen.1 states "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." ET'ism is just as much crap as evolution.
I believe the Bible teaches us everything we need to know. Even Paul explained the Gospels to the greeks, we do not know if they had ever heard of Christ, but I do not believe they had any recogning of him. As christians we are instructed to tell everyone the Good News.
people who believe in such non-sense as a pre-adamic time period have NO FAITH IN GOD. Hugh Ross & others like him only teach that the Word of God is a lie.