IEA Podcast

In this Institute of Economic Affairs discussion, Chair Syed Kamall hosts a panel examining Britain's welfare crisis with Dr Stephen Davies (Senior Education Fellow, IEA), Edward Davies (Research Director, Centre for Social Justice), Danny Kruger MP (then Shadow Minister for Work & Pensions), Fraser Nelson (Times Columnist & former Spectator Editor), and Andy Cox (Co-Director, SIGNAL). The conversation explores how the current welfare system creates dependency rather than addressing social marginalisation, with 6.25 million people on out-of-work benefits compared to just 1.67 million claiming unemployment - a scale that would have been considered catastrophic in previous decades.The panel discusses the urgent need for radical reform, moving away from the managerial state approach toward more relational, community-based solutions that restore personal agency. Key themes include the breakdown of family structures (with only 50% of children now living with both parents by GCSE age), the over-medicalisation of low-level mental health conditions, and how current policies inadvertently subsidise worklessness while penalising family formation. They examine successful models from civil society organisations that prioritise trusted relationships over bureaucratic compliance.The discussion concludes with warnings about an impending debt crisis that could force punitive reforms if proactive change isn't implemented. The panellists argue for devolving responsibility from central government to local communities, reforming the tax system to support marriage and stable families, and fundamentally rethinking the role of civil society in welfare provision. They emphasise that without addressing the moral and values crisis underlying welfare dependency, policy tinkering will remain insufficient to tackle Britain's most entrenched social problems. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, Communications Director Callum Price is joined by Executive Director Tom Clougherty and Managing Editor Daniel Freeman. The conversation covers Andy Burnham’s vision for “Burnhamism” - his self-described “business friendly socialism” outlined in a lengthy New Statesman interview. They examine his proposals for mass renationalisation of buses, railways, energy and water companies, along with ambitious social housing programs funded through wealth taxes. The discussion also explores the Resolution Foundation’s latest tax proposals, including their suggestion to shift from National Insurance to income tax while raising overall revenue by £35 billion.The hosts critically analyse Burnham’s economic agenda, questioning how his spending commitments could realistically be funded without broad-based tax increases on ordinary workers rather than just “taxing the rich.” Tom Clougherty highlights the mathematical impossibility of funding such ambitious programs through wealth taxes alone, noting that public spending has more than doubled in real terms since 1997. They discuss the growing chorus of voices, including the Institute of Directors and Resolution Foundation, now openly calling for income tax rises as fiscal reality sets in.The episode concludes with an examination of the government’s proposed digital ID cards, branded as “Brit cards,” which Prime Minister Keir Starmer is positioning as a solution to illegal immigration. While acknowledging potential convenience benefits of streamlining government interactions, both Tom and Daniel express scepticism about whether mandatory ID cards will meaningfully reduce illegal working, given that other European countries with similar systems still struggle with larger black economies than Britain. They warn of the slippery slope toward an intrusive nanny state while debating whether voluntary adoption might be preferable to compulsory implementation. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, IEA Director of Communications Callum Price interviews Andrew Barclay, entrepreneur and founder of Land of Opportunity, a campaign group exploring economic lessons from America. The conversation examines why the US economy has dramatically outpaced the EU since 2008, with America's GDP skyrocketing ahead while Europe stagnated. Barclay discusses his team's research trip to America to understand what drives their economic success and how Britain can learn from their pro-enterprise culture and policies. The discussion reveals how America's bipartisan celebration of the "American Dream" creates a culture where aspiration and wealth creation are rewarded across political lines. Barclay explains how the US tax system is structured to favour long-term wealth creation, with features like tax deferrals for property developers who reinvest profits and capital gains incentives for start-up investments. He contrasts this with Britain's complex tax code filled with cliff edges and disincentives, such as the VAT threshold that actually encourages businesses to stay small, and argues that America instinctively views regulation as increasing costs on business rather than helping it. Looking at solutions for Britain, Barclay advocates for reducing the size of government and welfare spending while returning money to entrepreneurs and wealth creators through tax reform. He emphasises that Britain still has the talent and innovation - describing the American Dream as "a British seed planted in American soil" - but has lost its way through decades of politics that penalised enterprise. The conversation concludes with his call for a bipartisan "British Dream" that celebrates aspiration and entrepreneurship, arguing that with the right cultural shift and policy changes, Britain can reclaim its position as a true land of opportunity. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, Head of Media Reem Ibrahim interviews John Penrose, recovering government minister, Chair of the Conservative Policy Forum and Director of the Centre for Small State Conservatives. The conversation examines Britain's economic decline through decades of missed opportunities, comparing the UK's sluggish growth to the United States where compounding effects have created a widening wealth gap. They explore structural problems across childcare, housing, rail, energy and healthcare that have remained unfixed for decades, with Penrose arguing that supply-side reforms similar to Thatcher's approach are essential to revive Britain's economic engine.Penrose advocates for fundamental welfare system reforms to eliminate benefit traps that discourage work, proposing that benefit withdrawal rates should never exceed the top rate of income tax. The discussion covers pension reform, moving from the current pay-as-you-go system to fully funded personal pots, and addresses the NHS as a bureaucratic system that spends significant taxpayer money without delivering outcomes comparable to other developed nations. They examine how regulatory burdens in childcare create expensive, rigid provision that doesn't match what working families actually need, arguing for deregulation to allow market-based solutions.The interview concludes with analysis of immigration policy challenges, including outdated refugee conventions written for a different era, and the political difficulties of implementing genuine small-state reforms. Penrose explains his Centre for Small State Conservatives' mission to develop policies that create "bigger citizens who need smaller government" through upstream prevention rather than expensive downstream intervention. The conversation addresses why the Conservative Party must return to its supply-side reform roots to tackle Britain's fundamental structural problems that neither increased spending nor current political approaches have resolved. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, IEA Head of Media and Linda Whetstone Scholar Reem Ibrahim interviews Executive Director Tom Clougherty and Editorial Director Kristian Niemietz. The conversation covers the deteriorating UK economy, examining zero growth in July, persistent inflation at 3.8%, and the highest August borrowing figures in five years. They discuss the Office for Budget Responsibility's expected downgrade of productivity forecasts, which could create an additional £36 billion fiscal black hole, and analyse why public sector productivity assumptions of four times historical growth rates appear unrealistic.The discussion explores Trump's recent visit to the UK and the nuclear energy agreements that emerged, particularly around mutual recognition of regulatory standards for US companies building nuclear power stations in Britain. They examine why UK nuclear costs are six times higher than South Korea's and advocate for regulatory free-riding and standardisation to reduce expenses. The conversation also covers the UK's declining energy production per capita since 2008 and questions how the country can achieve innovation and growth while using less energy.The podcast concludes with analysis of recent political protests in Britain, including the Unite the Kingdom march and anti-Trump demonstrations, examining what these movements reveal about the direction of British politics. They compare the UK's economic challenges with France's more severe fiscal problems, noting France's unique position as the only country where over-65s have higher average incomes than working-age people. The discussion highlights concerns about prioritising cultural issues over economic growth and questions whether either emerging political movement will support classical liberal free-market reforms. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs briefing, managing editor Daniel Freeman interviews Stephen Dnes, a competition lawyer with 15 years of experience and lecturer at Royal Holloway, University of London, about his new IEA report, titled “Class Act,” examining the rise of class action litigation in the UK. The discussion covers the dramatic growth of opt-out class actions since their introduction in 2015, with current claims totaling between £95-135 billion and potentially affecting every adult in Britain as claimants in multiple cases. Dnes explains how these cases work, from hardcore cartels like alleged salmon price-fixing to more contentious claims involving data usage by tech companies.The conversation reveals significant problems with the current system, including cases taking up to nine years to complete, mixed quality claims, and conflicts of interest between third-party litigation funders, lawyers, and consumers. Dnes highlights the dramatic Merricks versus Mastercard case, which after nine years resulted in a settlement where funders initially attempted to claim £179 million of a £200 million settlement, leaving just 48 pence for each of the 44 million claimants. He explains how the current funding structure creates perverse incentives that can delay settlements and prioritize funder returns over consumer compensation.Dnes proposes market-based reforms to address these issues, particularly requiring funders to pay out a portion of claims upfront to demonstrate their confidence in cases and ensure money actually reaches consumers. Drawing on examples from Germany's emerging system, he argues this would weed out weak claims, speed up proceedings, and align incentives between all parties. The discussion concludes with Dnes expressing cautious optimism about potential government reforms, noting that legal changes are inevitable due to recent court decisions, though the scope of broader reforms remains uncertain.Read “Class Act” here. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, IEA Executive Director Tom Clougherty interviews Professor Simon Johnson, 2024 Nobel Prize winner in Economics from MIT. The conversation explores Johnson's groundbreaking research on extractive versus inclusive institutions and how colonial mortality rates shaped economic development patterns that persist today. Johnson explains how European settlers' different experiences with disease in various colonies led to fundamentally different institutional structures - from the inclusive property rights systems established in North America to the extractive frameworks left behind in West Africa and the Caribbean.The discussion examines how these institutional differences became supercharged during the Industrial Revolution, enabling countries with inclusive institutions to industrialise rapidly while others lagged behind. Johnson draws on his family's Sheffield manufacturing background to illustrate how rule of law and property rights protection enabled Britain's industrial middle class to flourish. They also address why bad institutions persist despite our understanding of their harmful effects, with Johnson arguing that powerful elites often benefit from extractive systems and resist changes that would broaden economic opportunity.The interview concludes with Johnson's concerns about institutional degradation in modern America, the risks of AI oligopoly creating new forms of central planning, and Europe's economic stagnation. Johnson advocates for entrepreneurship, competition, and decentralised innovation while warning against both technological monism and fiscal irresponsibility. He calls for a return to fiscal conservatism and emphasises the importance of inclusive institutions that empower entrepreneurs and support shared prosperity rather than concentrated wealth extraction. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

Join IEA Managing Editor Daniel Freeman in conversation with Ian Williams, author of "Vampire State: The Rise and Fall of the Chinese Economy," for an analysis of China's mounting economic challenges. Williams, a veteran journalist with 20 years of experience covering China as a foreign correspondent for Channel 4 News and NBC, delivers a chilling account of how the world's second-largest economy is facing an unprecedented crisis of sustainability.In this wide-ranging discussion, Williams exposes the fundamental flaws in China's economic model - from the burst property bubble that once accounted for a third of the economy to the systematic manipulation of growth statistics that he likens to "one of the greatest works of contemporary Chinese fiction." The conversation explores Xi Jinping's shift from economic pragmatism to authoritarian control, the ghost cities littering China's landscape, and why the Communist Party has effectively "criminalised pessimism" about economic data. Williams argues that China's leaders have created a system so dependent on unsustainable drivers like property speculation and wasteful infrastructure investment that transition to genuine innovation-led growth may be impossible under current leadership.The discussion also delves into China's use of economic coercion as a geopolitical weapon, the demographic time bomb facing the nation, and why Xi Jinping's ambitious plan to make China a football superpower serves as a perfect metaphor for the limitations of top-down innovation in an authoritarian system. This is essential viewing for anyone seeking to understand the real state of China's economy beyond the official propaganda.Buy Vampire State here. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, Communications Director Callum Price interviews Executive Director Tom Clougherty and Editorial Director Kristian Niemietz. The conversation examines Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch's offer to help Labour cut the welfare bill and her party's return to fiscal conservatism. They discuss whether this represents genuine commitment to balanced budgets or political positioning, questioning how radical the Conservatives are prepared to be when they refuse to touch entitlements for older voters like the state pension and triple lock.The discussion turns to Labour's internal divisions as the party faces a deputy leadership contest that exposes tensions between pro-growth and spending-focused factions. They analyse how Labour's abundance agenda has stalled, with policies like the Employment Rights Bill and Renters Rights Bill undermining growth objectives. The hosts examine whether Labour's early optimism about deregulation was merely skin deep, and explore the emerging split between the Treasury's fiscal conservatism and other departments' regulatory expansion.The conversation concludes with an examination of the Competition and Markets Authority's plans to target Google and Apple under new strategic market status powers. Tom Clougherty argues this represents a fundamental misstep in competition policy, focusing on static market share measures rather than dynamic innovation. They discuss how Britain missed the opportunity for post-Brexit regulatory divergence, instead adopting even more interventionist approaches than the EU. The broader theme emerges of Britain's shift from central planning to bureaucratic control, with the regulatory state strangling entrepreneurship and innovation across multiple sectors. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, IEA Communications Director Callum Price interviews Rory Sutherland, Vice Chairman of Ogilvy Group and prolific commentator on economics and society. The conversation explores how markets function as discovery mechanisms, with Sutherland arguing that capitalism's greatest strength lies not in efficiency but in its ability to uncover valuable innovations that couldn't be predicted in advance - from his own unexpected TikTok success to products like Red Bull that would never have survived central planning. They discuss how businesses can create value by triangulating the interests of customers, employees, investors, and society, with examples from companies like Dyson and Costco that demonstrate the commercial benefits of exceptional customer service. Sutherland examines the housing market as a complex system with multiple contributing factors, from planning restrictions to psychological behaviors around property purchasing. He analyses how technological advancement has made consumer goods dramatically more affordable while housing costs have risen, creating new economic dynamics where wealth increasingly flows toward property ownership. The discussion covers innovative policy solutions including Japanese-style planning reform, land value capture to fund infrastructure, and flexible working arrangements that could help people escape geographic constraints on housing costs. The conversation addresses broader institutional challenges including the bureaucratisation of decision-making, the balance between process fairness and practical outcomes, and the importance of preserving space for human judgment and humour in increasingly regulated environments. Sutherland advocates for localised governance, innovation prizes for practical problem-solving, and policies that recognise different forms of value creation. Throughout, he maintains his characteristic blend of advertising industry insights, behavioural economics, and pragmatic policy thinking, offering constructive approaches to complex economic and social challenges while celebrating entrepreneurial innovation and market-driven solutions. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs interview, our Managing Editor Daniel Freeman interviews Mary Kissel, Executive Vice President at investment bank Stephens and former Senior Advisor to US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. The conversation examines the current state of US-China relations, China's economic challenges under Xi Jinping, and the national security threats posed by Chinese infiltration of Western infrastructure. They discuss how the Trump administration's 2017-2018 national security strategy marked a shift from viewing China as a competitor to recognising it as an adversary, particularly following China's handling of Covid-19 and ongoing cyberattacks like the Salt Typhoon hack.Kissel argues that economic interdependence has failed to liberalise China politically, describing Xi Jinping as a pure expression of Communist Party control rather than an aberration. She explains how US companies are increasingly divesting from China following the lessons learned from Russia's invasion of Ukraine, though Fortune 500 companies with significant investments remain committed. The discussion covers China's military buildup, including its million-man army and 600 nuclear weapons, alongside domestic repression including the treatment of Uyghurs and the use of 1.5 million police to monitor Chinese citizens.The interview concludes with an examination of Hong Kong's transformation and the case of imprisoned newspaper proprietor Jimmy Lai, whom Kissel describes as a friend facing life imprisonment for peaceful protests and press freedom. She criticises Britain's response to Lai's detention as inadequate and argues that Hong Kong now serves as a preview of what a China-led world order would look like. Kissel emphasises that Western democracies must move beyond "strategic narcissism" to understand China's true intentions and take coordinated action to protect critical infrastructure and democratic values. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs Podcast, Managing Editor Daniel Freeman is joined by Executive Director Tom Clougherty and Editorial Director Kristian Niemietz to examine whether Britain is truly facing fiscal meltdown or if the doom-mongering has been overblown. The conversation unpacks Chris Giles' Financial Times analysis arguing that Britain's fiscal situation, while problematic, may not be as catastrophic as commonly portrayed. They discuss how Britain's deficit compares favourably to the United States, why UK borrowing costs remain stubbornly high despite relatively better fundamentals, and whether the endless cycle of fiscal speculation created by having two budget events per year is contributing to market pessimism.The discussion turns to how government policy is actively undermining growth through a proposed dramatic increase in landfill duties that could add tens of thousands of pounds to housing construction costs. Freeman, Clougherty and Niemietz explore the cascade of new building regulations, safety requirements, and bureaucratic hurdles that have caused London housebuilding to collapse to just 2,158 new homes started in the first half of 2025. They examine how dual-aspect flat requirements, second staircase rules, and a building safety regulator with a 70% rejection rate are combining with planning constraints and affordable housing targets to make construction economically unviable in areas with the highest housing demand.The podcast concludes with an examination of free speech in Britain following the high-profile arrest of comedian Graham Linehan at Heathrow Airport for allegedly anti-trans tweets posted while in America. The hosts discuss why this case has attracted cross-party criticism, the disproportionate police response involving five armed officers, and whether the increasing frequency of social media arrests signals a need for stronger legislative protection of free expression. They consider how both progressive and conservative voices are beginning to recognise that current speech laws may be creating a chilling effect that extends beyond their intended targets. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this episode of Free the Power, the IEA’s COO and resident Energy Analyst Andy Mayer interviews Kathryn Porter, independent energy consultant and founder of Watt-Logic. The conversation examines the devastating blackouts that hit Spain and Portugal on April 28th, 2025, when the entire Iberian Peninsula went offline for ten hours, resulting in eleven fatalities. Porter provides detailed analysis of how renewable energy systems contributed to the cascade failure, starting with a malfunctioning solar inverter that created voltage oscillations across the grid.Porter explains the complex physics behind grid stability, revealing how conventional power stations with heavy spinning turbines provide essential inertia that keeps electricity systems stable, while renewable sources using electronic inverters create vulnerabilities. She details how widespread non-compliance with grid codes by renewable generators caused frequency deviations that ultimately triggered the system-wide collapse. The discussion covers the dangerous ten-hour "black start" process required to restore power, where engineers must carefully synchronise power stations one by one to avoid damaging equipment.The interview concludes with warnings about similar risks facing Britain's electricity system. Porter identifies critical vulnerabilities including inadequate demand forecasting that hasn't been updated in decades, aging infrastructure from the 1970s nearing end-of-life, and over-reliance on imports from European neighbours who are themselves facing energy shortages. She criticises National Grid ESO and Ofgem for prioritising net zero messaging over system security, arguing that current policies are creating dangerous conditions that could lead to blackouts costing lives.Check out Kathryn’s work here. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs interview, our Director of Communications Callum Price interviews Sam Richards, CEO of Britain Remade and former special adviser at 10 Downing Street. The conversation examines Britain's fundamental growth problem - the country's inability to build essential infrastructure. Richards argues that underpinning Britain's economic challenges, from the world's highest industrial energy costs to London being Europe's most expensive city for housing, is the fact that Britain has effectively banned building across energy, transport and housing sectors.Richards traces the roots of Britain's building crisis back to the 1947 Town and Country Planning Act, which he describes as creating a uniquely restrictive system where the state has veto power over private land use. The discussion covers the absurd costs of environmental regulations, including the £121 million bat tunnel and 80,000-page planning applications for 3.3 miles of railway track. He criticises the current environmental protection system as failing both development and nature, with all natural indicators in decline despite blocking essential infrastructure. The conversation also addresses Scotland's nuclear ban, despite nuclear being the safest form of energy, and the need for zonal pricing to incentivise local energy infrastructure acceptance.The interview concludes with an assessment of the current Labour government's planning reforms, which Richards argues fail to deliver the radical wholesale changes needed. Despite rhetoric about backing builders over blockers, he suggests the government's planning bill merely adds another regulatory layer rather than fundamentally reforming the discretionary system. Richards advocates for three key changes: scrapping habitats regulations for strategic conservation, shifting to a zonal planning system, and unbanning nuclear power in Scotland to unlock Britain's economic growth potential.Find Britain Remade here. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs Podcast, Director of Communications Callum Price hosts a discussion with IEA Executive Director Tom Clougherty and Managing Editor Daniel Freeman on Britain's escalating fiscal crisis and the government's response. The conversation examines why UK borrowing costs have reached their highest levels since 1997 - famously dubbed "the highest since Geri Halliwell left the Spice Girls" - making Britain consistently the worst performer among G7 countries for government debt costs.The panel dissects the three key factors driving this crisis: declining investor confidence in fiscal policy credibility following government U-turns on Winter Fuel Payments and benefit reforms, the Bank of England's continued quantitative tightening programme, and persistently high UK inflation rates. With annual interest payments now reaching £110 billion - five times the entire policing budget and double defence spending - the government faces a potential £25-50 billion fiscal gap. Clougherty explains how this creates a dangerous "fiscal doom loop" where higher borrowing costs force more borrowing, which drives rates even higher. The discussion explores proposed solutions including National Insurance contributions on landlords' rental income, though Freeman warns this could drive more landlords from the market and worsen housing supply. They also examine proposals for windfall taxes on banks' quantitative easing reserves, with Clougherty arguing this resembles "bank robbers' modus operandi" and could increase borrowing costs for ordinary consumers.The podcast concludes with analysis of Trump's dramatic shift toward state capitalism, including government stakes in Intel and profit-sharing deals with Nvidia. Clougherty highlights how this represents a fundamental departure from free market principles, with Trump explicitly stating he will help companies "willing to make lucrative deals" with his administration. The panel discusses how this personalised industrial policy transforms business-government relations and marks a significant cultural shift in the Republican Party, with formerly mainstream conservative voices now reluctant to criticise state intervention in private markets. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs interview, our Executive Director Tom Clougherty interviews Professor Cass Sunstein, former Obama administration official and co-author of "Nudge", discussing his new book "On Liberalism: In Defence of Freedom". The conversation explores Sunstein's "big tent liberalism" that encompasses figures from Reagan to Roosevelt, examining how liberalism can unite diverse political perspectives around core commitments to pluralism, freedom, and the rule of law while accommodating different views on economic policy and social issues.Sunstein defends his concept of "experiments in living" as central to liberal philosophy, drawing from John Stuart Mill's ideas to argue that liberalism should protect people's freedom to pursue different ways of life, from entrepreneurial ventures to alternative communities. He discusses how this principle applies to both social freedoms and economic liberty, criticising excessive occupational licensing restrictions that prevent people from pursuing their chosen paths. The conversation also examines Hayek's contributions to liberal economics, particularly his insights about dispersed knowledge and the price system, while exploring how behavioural economics can complement rather than contradict Hayekian thinking.The interview concludes with Sunstein's defence of "nudging" as a liberal approach to policy-making that respects individual choice while helping people make better decisions for themselves. He addresses criticisms from both libertarians who see nudges as paternalistic and progressives who want more aggressive interventions, arguing that educative and architectural approaches can guide people toward better outcomes without coercion. Despite challenges from both illiberal left and right movements, Sunstein remains optimistic about liberalism's future, suggesting that threats to liberal values are causing people to rediscover their importance.Pre-order “On Liberalism: In Defence of Freedom” here. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs Podcast, Head of Media Reem Ibrahim hosts a discussion with IEA Executive Director Tom Clougherty and Managing Editor Daniel Freeman on the government's upcoming budget and various tax policy proposals currently being floated. The conversation covers a "tax proposal extravaganza" including potential reforms to property taxation, capital gains tax on primary residences, pension lump sum changes, and inheritance tax modifications. They examine how these proposals might affect the UK's fiscal position ahead of the anticipated autumn budget, with the government facing a significant fiscal gap of potentially up to £50 billion.The discussion delves into the economic impacts of stamp duty and why replacing it with a proportional property tax could benefit the housing market, though the political challenges remain substantial. Clougherty explains how stamp duty creates harmful distortions by discouraging property transactions and keeping people in unsuitable homes, while Freeman highlights the contradiction between economically damaging taxes often being less politically unpopular. They also analyse proposals for capital gains tax on primary residences, concluding it would likely raise little revenue due to its similar distortionary effects to stamp duty, and examine potential changes to pension tax relief and inheritance tax rules.The podcast concludes with an examination of recent research on universal basic income trials in the United States, where studies have shown disappointing results despite significant financial investment. Freeman explains how these trials, involving hundreds of participants receiving up to $1,000 monthly, failed to produce the expected improvements in health, education, or mental wellbeing outcomes, with the only consistent effect being reduced work hours. The discussion touches on how these findings relate to the UK's current benefit system and the importance of work requirements and conditionality in welfare provision. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs briefing, our Head of Media, Reem Ibrahim, interviews Chris Snowdon, Head of Lifestyle Economics, about his new discussion paper "Anti-Capitalism and Public Health." The conversation examines how public health discourse has evolved from targeting specific industries like "big tobacco" and "big food" to attacking what academics call "commercial determinants of health" - essentially any profit-making enterprise. They discuss how major institutions including The Lancet, British Medical Journal, and World Health Organisation have embraced anti-capitalist rhetoric, with some academics viewing economic growth itself as harmful to public health.Snowdon explains how public health experts have expanded their scope beyond traditional health concerns to critique free trade, economic growth, and commercial activities generally. He highlights concerning examples, including a former WHO advisor who praised China's Covid lockdowns as proof that "switching off capitalism protects us from ourselves." The discussion reveals how this movement draws inspiration from "Doughnut Economics" and promotes policies that would fundamentally reshape economic systems rather than address specific health issues.The interview concludes with concerns about the political influence of public health campaigning on British policy. Snowdon argues that politicians have proven susceptible to activists claiming scientific authority while pursuing anti-business agendas, resulting in policies like minimum alcohol pricing, sugar taxes, and generational tobacco bans. He warns that the public should understand the ideological motivations behind campaigns presented as neutral, evidence-based public health interventions.Read the full publication here.Read the press release here. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs interview, the IEA’s Director of Communications Callum Price sits down with Sir Simon Clarke, former Conservative MP, Treasury Chief Secretary, and current Director of Onward. The conversation tackles Britain's housing crisis, with Clarke arguing the UK is 4-5 million homes short and criticising government climbdowns on planning reform. He advocates for densifying cities while challenging the "brownfield only" mindset, calling for a more realistic approach to building on lower-value countryside sites including golf courses and poor agricultural land.Clarke delivers a stark assessment of Britain's economic challenges, warning that the state is spending too much and describing a cultural shift where wealth creation has become viewed with suspicion rather than celebrated. He identifies a "doom loop" where excessive spending requires higher taxes on wealth creators, damaging growth and necessitating even more spending. The discussion covers welfare reform, with Clarke highlighting that 1.2 million more people are now on health-related benefits since February 2020, calling this statistically implausible and economically damaging.The interview concludes with Clarke's prescription for economic revival: aggressive housing supply reform, curbing state spending including scrapping the pension triple lock, tax cuts starting with reversing National Insurance increases, and regulatory reset embracing Brexit opportunities. He argues the next Conservative government must leave the European Convention on Human Rights to restore democratic control and calls for a fundamental cultural reset similar to the 1980s transformation, warning that Britain cannot assume prosperity as of right but must actively pursue policies that enable success. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, the IEA’s Head of Media Reem Ibrahim interviews Stan Veuger, Senior Fellow in Economic Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute. The conversation examines the dramatic shift in Trump's second-term trade policy, including unprecedented 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico, the "reciprocal tariffs" announced in April affecting virtually every country globally, and the resulting economic turbulence that saw US GDP growth slow from 2.8% to just 1.2%. Veuger explains how these policies represent Trump's longstanding mercantilist worldview rather than strategic negotiating tactics, and discusses the ongoing legal challenges that could potentially overturn the tariff regime.The discussion explores the macroeconomic consequences of both trade and immigration restrictions, with Veuger detailing how the administration has effectively reduced net migration to near zero through deportation efforts and eliminating legal pathways like humanitarian parole programs. He argues this represents a significant drag on economic growth, contributing to the broader slowdown alongside trade disruptions. The conversation covers which industries are most affected, from manufacturing sectors dependent on intermediate goods imports to service industries that rely on immigrant labor.Veuger concludes by examining the political landscape around these policies, noting the limited Congressional appetite for challenging Trump's approach and why legal challenges may offer the best hope for rolling back protectionist measures. He discusses the fiscal implications of tariff revenue collection, the constitutional questions around executive power in trade policy, and offers his predictions for potential policy reversals under future administrations. The interview provides crucial insights into how economic nationalism is reshaping American trade and immigration policy with global implications. Get full access to Institute of Economic Affairs | Insider at insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe