The Danish Illusion Podcast

My second interview with David A. HughesI have previously interviewed David on the highly relevant topic of “Technocracy”. Although the first interview lasted more than an hour, I didn’t feel that we had exhausted the subject and David’s vast knowledge of Technocracy, Omniwar, and the world situation in general. That’s why I arranged this second interview, which I think is even better than the first, as David really lets off steam, in his own gentlemanly British way, of course.Download David’s book for free!I cannot praise his first book ““Covid-19,” Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy” enough, and I encourage everybody to download it for free and read it, or even print it (yes, you can do that legally and for free!).Did you miss the first interview?It is right here on the below link…Coming up…I want to interview David about the subject of his book “Wall Street, the Nazis, and the Crimes of the Deep State.” Many people do not realize how closely connected the oligarchic elites on Wall Street and world events such as Hitler’s and nazism’s rise to power really are. Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe

An Academic’s take on the WorldDavid A. Hughes has no less than two Ph.d’s (German and International Relations [IR]) and has worked for a handful of universities.He started looking into 9/11 at the end of 2016 which eventually led him to later leave the cosy university life at the Lincoln University in the Eastern part of UK. The Three Camps of AwarenessDavid has invented a framework he has dubbed “The Three Camps of Awareness”It is a neat framwork to understand two things:* How one’s understanding of the true state of the World evolves over three levels.* How immense counterinsurgency infiltration in reality is.Camp 1:The unawake state where you listen to radio, TV, politicians, etc. to get your news of the World, uanware of any conspiracies against the populace.Camp 2:When you become aware to the fact that the narrative pushed by schools, academia, medias and politicians are twisted and sometimes entirely fake, you also become susceptible to a range of alternative inputs, which might not al of them lead you to enlightenment of the truth. In Camp 2 the counterinsurgency agents are particularly eager in trying to scoop you into (the CIA-dubbed) limited hangouts. An example of such actors are Del Bigtree (The Highwire), Meryl Nash (Children’s Health Defense) and Jimmy Dore (Jimmy Dore Show), which I myself called out one and a half year ago, after participating in a rally in Geneva for the WHO’s 77th World Health Assembly (see link and link). The rally were in my oppinion infested with counterinsurgency agents and proponents of different limited hangouts.Camp 3:When you have done your own extensive research and can see the difference between the real truths and the (often astroturfed) faked or half truths. In camp 3 you are immune to counterinsurgency agents and trolls.The role of the Tavistock Institute and the CIAAmongst other important subjects David explain in details in his first book “Covid-19,” Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy, Volume 1. - and with tonnes of links and references - just how covert institutions like Tavistock Institute and the CIA fits into the conspiracy against the populace.And you can even download it for free on below link:Download his book for freeIt is impossible for me to exaggerate the value of David’s book “Covid-19,” Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy, Volume 1.During the interview David mentions his paper on 9/11, which is available on Lincoln Universtity’s homepage on the link below:* 9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR DisciplinePlease do support David A. HughesI highly recommend you to sign up for David’s Substack newsletter and to support his work.There is a wealth of information on his Substack landing page, as he is doing a lot of interviews with various alternative platforms. Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe

The Story about the little Boy and the Emperor with no Clothes on!The little boy who is the only one brave enough to say out loud that the emperor has no clothes is a good analogy for how fascism works. The king steals from the people through taxes and duties and distributes some of this wealth to the private sector, which in turn helps him keep the people in check.Early in 2020, a great deal of documentation emerged showing that the WHO and the vaccine industry were using dirty tricks, that politicians and the press around the world were behaving in a strangely coordinated and uniform manner, that face masks were largely ineffective against viruses, and that the COVID-19 tests were inaccurate and were in fact the reason why infection numbers were being artificially inflated. So, by the beginning of 2021, the average critically thinking Dane already had access to the necessary information and documentation to see through our government's exploitation of the coronavirus situation to gain more power through hastily passed laws.Nevertheless, the madness continued, and 2021 was marked by the coronavirus from the outset. I had been involved in organizing demonstrations in front of the Danish Parliament, Christiansborg since the summer of 2020, and on November 13, 2020, as mentioned earlier, around 6-7,000 people gathered in front of Christiansborg, where politicians gave in to public pressure and rejected the epidemic law. Even the Social Democrats did not vote for their own proposal for a new epidemic law.It turned out that the health policy situation worsened further in 2021, and as demonstrated in the previous chapter, this happened in the most vulgar possible way.Parliament Act 150 - Danes as guinea pigsIn January 2021, the Ministry of Health requested DKK 48.5 million from the Danish Parliament's Finance Committee for a research project to conduct a national clinical study on the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. The request is set out in the document entitled “Aktstykke 150”, or in English “Parliament Act No. 150”.At that time, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) had granted conditional marketing authorization for Pfizer-BioNTech's and Moderna's mRNA vaccines. Another approval was on the way for AstraZeneca's rDNA vaccine, which was also approved shortly thereafter on the same terms as the mRNA vaccines, but AstraZeneca's vaccine was later withdrawn from the market in Denmark. Although this so-called vaccine was quickly withdrawn from the market, it still accounts for a relatively large proportion of the reported suspected side effects from COVID-19 vaccines in Denmark.Parliament Act 150 literally shows what a huge gamble was taken with the launch of COVID-19 vaccines around the turn of the year 2020/2021. There was simply a lack of basic knowledge about the vaccines, and the scandalous conditional marketing approval is in a category all its own: a huge medical experiment in which the entire Danish population participated as guinea pigs!Here are some excerpts from the four-page document, Parliament Act 150:“The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has provisionally granted conditional marketing authorization for two newly developed vaccines against COVID-19: BioNTech/Pfizer's vaccine and Moderna's vaccine.”“It is further expected that AstraZeneca's vaccine will receive conditional approval on January 29 and that additional vaccines may be approved and used in the first half of 2021.”“Denmark has begun vaccinating against COVID-19.”“However, knowledge about the effectiveness of the various vaccines in terms of, among other things, the degree of immunity and the time horizon for immunity is limited.”“The COVID-19 vaccines are being approved by the EMA based on clinical studies in which the vaccines’ effectiveness and side effects have been monitored for a period of approximately two months after the second injection of the vaccine.”“The EMA has assessed that the documentation for the two vaccines is sufficient for conditional approval.”“The long-term efficacy of the vaccines is unknown.”“Based on the clinical trials that form the basis for the approval of the approved vaccines, there is only evidence that the purchased vaccines provide immunity for two to three months, as this is the duration of the large clinical trials.”“The expectation is that the immunity will last for a longer period, but this has not yet been proven.”“Several of the new vaccines are based on new technologies – these new technologies have not previously been approved and widely used in the population. The long-term effects can be monitored in a study such as the one proposed.”“The Danish Medicines Agency, the Danish Health Authority, and the Statens Serum Institut assess that the proposed study is the only real opportunity to monitor whether the vaccines work as intended.”I hope that the above excerpt from Act 150 gives the reader an impression of what was happening at that time in Danish history: the government, with the support of the Folketing, had turned the entire Danish population into guinea pigs in a huge medical and biological experiment.If you would like to read the full text of document no. 150, you can find it on the Danish Parliament's website as a permanent reminder and warning (however, I had to confirm three times that I was human before I was granted access to the document when I last tried). (1)Away with the Constitution and bring on the Epidemic Act!Do the government and parliament have the power to mislead the population and get away with disregarding the Constitution?The answer is both yes and no. Yes, because that is precisely what happened with the two epidemic laws passed in 2020 and 2021. The full text of both of these epidemic laws can be found on Retsinformation.But I would also argue that the answer is no, because according to the Constitution, it is the royal family that formally holds power, and the regent who presides over the Council of State. No new laws can come into force without the signature of the sitting regent and a sitting minister.However, it is the prime minister who is the visible part of the more invisible power structure, which very few Danes are interested in. The prime minister is merely a puppet figure, tightly controlled by what we might euphemistically call ‘the establishment’, ‘the shadow state’ or ‘the deep state’. In the next chapter, I will return to Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, who formed a new government in December 2022 after a month and a half of negotiations as the appointed royal investigator. But let's just focus on the Epidemic Act for now.It is typically the ministers responsible for the various areas of government who propose the bills that are later passed and, I would argue, in many cases violate the Constitution. Former Health Minister Magnus Heunicke was just such a minister, who in less than 12 months put forward no less than two epidemic law bills that violate the Constitution. For obvious reasons, Magnus Heunicke only served as health minister by the grace of the prime minister, or the royal family, if you will. The most remarkable thing is that Magnus Heunicke got away with it, almost without any of the many official political commentators saying anything about a referendum. The few who do mention it are not given any airtime in the media. This is an interesting fact that is truly astonishing and should raise the eyebrow of any Dane who thinks he or she lives in a democratic state!But it only becomes really interesting when such an epidemic law proposal is passed through first two of three parliamentary debates by an almost unanimous parliament. Still not a word about the violation of the Constitution and/or a referendum. Or almost not. Because I participated as both organizer and co-organizer of the many demonstrations that undoubtedly contributed to the fact that not even the Social Democrats voted for their own bill on a new epidemic law on November 13, 2020. On that day, the epidemic bill fell during its third proceeding in the Parliament, as no one voted for it. Not even the Social Democrats who had proposed it! (2)I would like to take this opportunity to send a special, warm and appreciative greeting to each and every one of the freedom fighters who demonstrated against the Epidemic Act in 2020, and especially to the 7,000 people who, on November 13, 2020, were able to celebrate one of the only real victories that this freedom struggle has been able to offer during the coronavirus pandemic. I have no doubt that this brave group will all be part of the story of Denmark's future when we have broken free from the iron grip of global fascism. There will come a day in the future when the question will be: Where were you, Grandma/Grandpa, when global fascism had to be fought back in the 2020s?Unfortunately, the large group of government coronavirus critics was completely divided between the great victory on November 13, 2020, and February 27, 2021. As a result, the demonstrations that took place in January and February 2021 were more sporadic and fragmented, giving politicians more peace and quiet to carry out their unconstitutional work. I have described he division that arose in the coronavirus critic community in my Danish book “Illusionen om Danmark - Del 1 - De 3 Tabte År” (not yet translated into english), but now I will finish commenting on the criminality that I believe has taken place in connection with this Epidemic Act. (3)Human rights and the Epidemic ActIt does not require a basic education to see that the current Danish epidemic law disregards the basic human rights of the people and renders elements of the Constitution inoperative. Of particular relevance are personal freedom under Section 71 of the Constitution, the protection of the home under Section 72, and the right of assembly under Section 79.The correct legal name for the current Danish epidemic law can be found, for example, by looking up the service Retsinformation. It’s called LAW n

Hail Caesar, the vaccines are coming“Today I got my first vaccine. Thank you to all of you who help us on our way to a normal everyday life again.”Crown prince Frederik (now kin Frederik 10.)That vaccines would be the decisive factor in saving the world from the deadly coronavirus pandemic was not a surprise in 2020. At least not to those who had done their homework. Remember, this scenario was practiced at Event 201 in New York in October 2019, where vaccines were ultimately at stake.The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved Pfizer BioNTech's so-called COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use on December 11, 2020. This was exactly 9 months after the WHO declared a pandemic. (1)Another 8 months later, on August 23, 2021, the FDA issues a press release stating that they have finally approved Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. (2)The FDA's Danish counterpart is the Danish Medicines Agency, which is the Danish authority that approves medicines on the Danish market. The Danish Medicines Agency is a body under the Ministry of Health, or the Ministry of the Interior and Health, as it has been renamed after the formation of the government on December 15, 2022. In November 2018, the Danish Medicines Agency was assessed and approved by the FDA so that Denmark, along with a handful of other European countries, could join the mutual inspection agreement that formally entered into force between the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the FDA already in 2017. This means that if the FDA approves a vaccine, the Danish Medicines Agency does not have to approve it, and vice versa. The benefits are many, especially for pharmaceutical companies, who only need to deploy their lobbyists to fight for approval of a drug in one country and the approval is valid for all countries covered by the agreement. (3)This is also the case with COVID-19 vaccines. Once they are approved by the FDA, it is a matter of course that the EMA and the Danish Medicines Agency also approve them.The Danish Medicines Agency summarizes the ‘facts’ about mRNA technology on their website, where they mention both the mRNA (Pfizer and Moderna) and rDNA (Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca) COVID-19 vaccines: “These technologies were both fully developed before the COVID-19 pandemic hit, but have not previously been used in approved vaccines”. Furthermore, the Danish Medicines Agency writes: “One of the great advantages of mRNA technology is that you can very quickly update vaccines for new corona variants without having to develop a completely new vaccine from scratch”. As an ordinary Dane reading the Danish Medicines Agency's summary of mRNA technology, you might not realize that the technology was only just being developed, which was also the reason why there was no need to wait several years before the new corona vaccines could be approved. Read the Danish Medicines Agency's information about the so-called vaccines against COVID-19 if you are interested in exactly what kind of materials the majority of the Danish population has had injected into their bodies. (4)On Sunday, December 27, the first Danes were vaccinated with a dose of Pfizer's so-called vaccine to prevent COVID-19 disease, a disease that can allegedly occur after infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus.While it normally takes 10-20 years to develop a vaccine against a disease, it took less than a year in the case of vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In fact, it took less than a few days from having the RNA material of the virus to having a vaccine ready.According to Pfizer, Moderna, the FDA, the EMA, the Danish Medicines Agency, Bill Gates, the WHO and all the others who claim to care about the health of the entire world's population, they had the mRNA technology in place to make a vaccine against the coronavirus when the pandemic was declared by the WHO on March 11, 2020.And they had also practiced via Event 201 how to crack down on the so-called ‘misinformation’ about the vaccines from vaccine skeptics around the world. Even before the vaccines were ready.2020 was a hectic year in which the world's authorities had the opportunity to show their worst side. In that respect, 2021 would prove to be even worse!The Danish Illusion is a reader supported publication.If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!):Links:* On December 11, 2020, the FDA announced that it has approved Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use:https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-key-action-fight-against-covid-19-issuing-emergency-use-authorization-first-covid-19* On September 23, 2021, the FDA announces final approval of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine:https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine* Inspection agreement signed in November 2018 between the Danish Medicines Agency and the FDA:https://laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/da/nyheder/2018/danmark-omfattet-af-inspektionsaftale-mellem-eu-og-usa/* The Danish Medicines Agency's general information on COVID-19 vaccines (January 2023):https://laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/da/nyheder/temaer/Generelt-om-vacciner-mod-COVID-19/ Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe

The biggest money laundering scandal in historyAt the time of writing, I have gone from having worked as a support engineer, department manager, sales engineer, project manager and management consultant to now having a job as a refuse collector, or bin man, as most people would probably call it.The garbage collector job is the only full-time job I've been offered for more than three years, despite having applied for hundreds of positions. The explanation is probably that a waste management company does not consider it a major obstacle that a Google search of my name reveals that it could look like I'm a person who attacks nurses and on top is also a corona sceptic. Because that's what you can read about me by doing a simple Google search.However, I will say that I'm happy to have a job where I do honest work, unlike some of the jobs I've held over the years. Take my last job, for example, where my engineering and MBA degrees and relatively long CV meant that I was a salaried employee, holding meetings and typing things into a computer. I was employed as a kind of project manager on a limited 1-year contract in the company Reckitt Benckiser at the Nordic headquarters in Gladsaxe in Copenhagen. The project was to split the company into two legally separate entities - one for their pharmaceutical products (RB Nordic Health A/S) and one for their household products (RB Nordic Hygiene A/S). At the time, the company had a turnover of around a quarter of a billion Danish kroner (DKK) but paid almost no tax locally in Denmark. This fact I only got interested in some time after I was hired. Initially, I was just proud to have landed a job for DKK 55,000 per month, my first higher-paying job after a long period of suffering from the after-effects of a period of stress. I went down with stress in 2017, when my then employer TACK International fired me after 3 days of stress illness. Boom, off you go! This is the behaviour of a consulting company whose core business is to train other companies' employees and managers. One of the reasons I went down with stress was that our consultant in Jutland had just gone down with stress, so I was asked to take our customers in Jutland with the result that I was commuting to Jutland every week with very long working days. It took me some time to recover from the stress illness, so it was very satisfying to land the job at Reckitt-Benckiser in October 2018.At some point during my project employment at Reckitt Benckiser, I became aware that the company had settled a major lawsuit that is part of the opioid scandal that has particularly ravaged the US. Opioid is the name of the painkiller products that companies like Reckitt-Benkiser sold on the US market. The whole court case was ended internally by Reckitt Benckiser's CEO sending out an announcement to all employees that the company had reached a agreement with the US government to pay a settlement of USD 1.4 billion in a case of illegal marketing of a pharmaceutical product. The CEO makes it clear to all employees that no Reckitt Benckiser employees have done anything wrong, but that the settlement is being made to “protect its shareholders”. The paradox is that despite the settlement costing the company 1.4 billion US dollars, no employees were penalised, except for the internal whistleblower who started the case and who has long since had to leave the company! You can read about the settlement on the US Department of Justice website. [1]When I found out I was quite shocked to work for a company that circumvented ethics and laws in such a cavalier manner. At the coffee machine, and during other one-on-one meetings with my colleagues, I tried to articulate that my integrity was affected by working in such a place. But as a project employee, I probably had less at stake than the permanent employees. In any case, I was very surprised to find that none of my colleagues were disgusted by the settlement and the way the case was closed by the company's CEO.It's worth noting that while such cases of illegal marketing of pharmaceutical products are not entirely uncommon in the US, it is one of the larger cases. Equally relevant in the post-corona “voluntary” vaccine shutdowns, it's worth noting that Pfizer is the company that appears to have committed the biggest illegality in the field, settling an illegal marketing case in 2009 for the astronomical sum of 2.3 billion US dollars. This is the same company that in 2021 and beyond has made billions and billions from the corona pandemic. The case from 2009 can also be read about on the American Department of Justice's website, which refers to the case as the biggest fraud in history. [2]Less than six months after Reckitt Benckiser's settlement, I was again shocked by a settlement reached in US litigation. The telecoms giant Ericsson, for whom I had previously worked in the Middle East, reached a similar settlement in December 2019 with the same Department of Justice as Reckitt Benckiser had done. However, in Ericsson’s case the opioid scandal had been replaced by a corruption scandal that involved a range of countries across continents. This time, however, the settlement amount was slightly lower, just over 1 billion US dollars, and this case can also be found on the Department of Justice website. [3]Ericsson had apparently been involved in corruption cases in Egypt, China, Djibouti, Indonesia, Vietnam and Kuwait and had been forced to settle for over a billion US dollars. How many employees were fired from Ericsson because of this corruption scandal? You guessed it: None!And while we're on the subject of international corporate crime, let's turn to Denmark’s number one bank in size and local familiarity: No Danske Bank employees lost their jobs as a result of the biggest money laundering case in World history? That's right, again: None! I remember a journalist asking an “expert” that very question and the answer was a big resounding “zero” with the explanation that the employees had probably already disappeared and were now working for other banks or other companies. The Danske Bank money laundering case has been labelled the biggest scandal in European history by the British newspaper The Guardian. Wikipedia calls it the possibly biggest money laundering scandal ever recorded. [4]At the end of 2019, I told one of my best friends who had helped me through the aftermath of my stress illness that I would never again work as a salaried employee for an international company. He just shrugged his shoulders in resignation, probably thinking that the last bit of sanity had left me, that the goal must be full and that I was unlikely to ever get back on my feet. I don't know if he was thinking exactly like that, because we don't talk anymore, we disagree on too many things, and it's probably mainly me who has moved significantly in my opinions and sympathies since we got to know each other many years ago. But I am extremely grateful to him for all the help and support he gave me during a difficult time.Now, you might sit and wonder: How come Ericsson had to pay 1 billion USD to the American Federal State in a settlement over corruption done in Egypt, China, Djibouti, Indonesia, Vietnam and Kuwait? And/or why Reckitt Benckiser had to pay 1,4 billion USD to the American Federal State over cheating the Americans on the street to buy their painkillers under false pretensions? And, in particular, why Danske Bank had to pay a settlement to the American Federal State over criminal money laundering done in Estonia?My views on international companies and the laws and regulations under which they operate have made me very cynical about international trade and globalism. I believe that the market economy capitalist system as we know it has failed miserably. I don't want to just turn my thumb down on free market forces and capitalism, because the implementation we have today is something completely different from that: There exist no ‘free market forces’ as it is all controlled by a very small banking elite. I will return to this strongly in the section on the economic fiction in the sequel to this book, which is a book I have written with two other authors and which is called ‘The 3 Fictions’.Links:* On 11 July 2019, Reckitt Benkiser settles with the Department of Justice regarding an opioid product: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-obtains-14-billion-reckitt-benckiser-group-largest-recovery-case* Pfizer's settlement is described by the Department of Justice as the largest fraud case in history: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history* On 6 December 2019, Ericsson settles with the Department of Justice regarding corruption: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/ericsson-agrees-pay-over-1-billion-resolve-fcpa-case* In September 2018, The Guardian called the Danske Bank money laundering scandal the biggest in Europe: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/sep/20/danske-bank-money-laundering-is-biggest-scandal-in-europe-european-commissionThe Danish Illusion is a reader supported publication.If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!): Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe

Dancing nursesIn 2020, dancing nurses would suddenly become a worldwide phenomenon, taking over the front pages of newspapers and going viral on social media.In October 2020, the Philippine media Philippine Star did a report on dancing nurses and the support that all healthcare workers on the frontline of the pandemic receive from the population.The video from the Philippines is just one of many posted on various media outlets in 2020. It was part of a trend that started in April 2020, when videos of nurses dancing with masks on began to proliferate just a month after the pandemic was declared by the WHO. The videos were supposedly meant to inspire courage and joy during a difficult time of the pandemic.But in the coronavirus sceptic community, it caused outrage because at the same time, there were videos of empty hospitals where coronavirus patients were allegedly hospitalised and, in some cases, dying. It is important to point out that, as far as I know, there is hardly a single corona sceptic who does not admit that a flu disease, such as COVID-19 and other flu viruses, can kill a person and that there are indeed people who have died from what they contracted during the corona pandemic. But these same people are also very aware that there is a huge difference between “dying from corona” and “dying with corona”.As it turned out, nurses and other frontline staff, i.e. paramedics and hospital staff around the world, had time in the midst of the tough fight against corona to act in videos where they performed choreographed dances. And the videos were supposed to “boost morale” according to the narrative accompanying them.I was very disgusted by the dancing nurse videos and very sceptical of doctors and nurses who just followed the narrative and encouraged face masks, hand sanitiser and distance without examining whether it made sense for the population in terms of health.Therefore, I was the author of some disclaimers intended to inform healthcare professionals, doctors and nurses, among others, that there were a number of scientific studies that did not support the government's corona policy.Philippine Star produced YouTube video about dancing nurses and public support:Compilation video on Bitchute of dancing nurses recorded all over the world:https://www.bitchute.com/video/YdK5WkaCeM2j/Alleged threat to a nurseOn Tuesday 22 December 2020, I was arrested by the police at my address in Emdrup in the middle of a live Zoom meeting I was hosting. The participants in the Zoom meeting watch as two police officers pick me up at my home at 8.30pm a few days before Christmas.The other day I forwarded someone else's Facebook post about a nurse speaking out about the corona situation, which is why I was suddenly treated like a common criminal who deserved no better than to be arrested at my home and taken into custody. I was asked to squat naked and cough so that the police officers could be sure that I didn't have any drugs on me. I was interrogated and later charged and indicted by the Copenhagen City Court for harassing and offending a nurse in the performance of her duties.Although I was acquitted in February 2021, the damage has been done to my public image, if I had one. If you do a Google search for ‘Flemming Blicher’, you will find two articles in the top ten search results that mention me as guilty before the case has even been heard in court.The very same day I was arrested, BT wrote their article about the case, which promised, among other things, that the then Minister for Health and the Elderly, Magnus Heunicke, would intervene in the case. To my knowledge, he never did. But there is no doubt what the vast majority of Danes are led to believe about me when they read such an article. A minister wants to get involved in the case, and I am referred to as having been convicted long before my case even goes to court.The Danish Nurses' Council (DSR) writes a very unflattering article about me allegedly threatening a nurse who spoke out about the corona situation. The main theme of the article is that the nurse is suffering psychologically from the attack I allegedly directed at her. As you can read from the article, in my comment and forwarding of the original post, I wrote the following: "I completely agree with Facebook user X. We need to get hold of the doctors and nurses who continue to hold hands over government and narrative. They MUST be held accountable! Better now than later. Help track down Named Nurse Y and hold her accountable for contributing to this fear-mongering and ask her for proof." As I discussed in a previous section, my focus at this point in 2020 was to hold accountable the people who contributed the most to scaring the population. Accountability was done by sending them an Accountability Notice.Shortly after the DSR article was published, it appeared at the very top of Google searches for my name, and has done so ever since. Follow THIS LINK to go the DSR article (in Danish). So if the average Dane comes across my name and wants to know a little more about who I am, one of the first things they find out is that I allegedly threatened a nurse while doing her job.There are also other articles at the top of the search results that link me to being at odds with the authorities. In a way, it is to be expected that I, as a key participant in the activism against the government's corona policy, am investigated and criticised by the media. However, I'm surprised that there isn't more interest among the many different newspapers, magazines and other media outlets to write about things from my point of view or that of corona activism in general? There is a little superficial writing here and there, but as a rule, there is a great distance between the journalist writing the article and myself. The same is true in the vast majority of other cases when someone from the corona activist community is interviewed. As if we are citizens without the same rights as “ordinary” citizens, or as if we are just different and should therefore be treated differently. As if we are against democracy and should therefore not be granted any democratic rights. The reality is that we want a people's government, which is the same as democracy. Democracy is derived from Greek and means the rule of the people, which is exactly what we are fighting for and which we believe we don't really have in Denmark at the moment. It is my opinion that politicians are not interested in the people's opinion but would rather explain to the people what we should think about corona, for example. The underlying theme is that politicians and their carefully selected experts will tell the people what to think.For example, since 2020, many millions of tax dollars have been spent on a media like TjekDet, which is designed to shame and reprimand a dissident like me, while politicians' lies are only rarely brought up.The case with the nurse ended with me getting a clean acquittal, but as I mentioned, the damage was already done. It doesn't really matter whether I was convicted or acquitted, because the article is online and that's where it stays. I've spoken to DSR and they won't take it down, but they said that they would instead write a new article about my acquittal, which they have done. The article about the acquittal is quite hard to find and there is no reference to it at the bottom of the old, defamatory article. Follow THIS LINK to go to the follow-up article, which is not even linked to in the original article (also in Danish)The fact that I'm only talking about holding the nurse accountable by sending her a NoL, just like all the other doctors, nurses and government officials who help perpetuate the government's fear narrative, the mainstream media apparently has no interest in exploring in depth.This is how you contribute to the miscarriage of justice of an acquitted man. It's scary that it works that way in Denmark, but I'm no longer as surprised by this kind of thing as I was in 2020 and 2021. I've seen far too many examples of these fascist traits of official Denmark for me to think it's coincidence.The Danish Illusion is a reader supported publication.If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!): Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe

Notice of Liability and Liability ClaimsAt the beginning of 2020 I experienced a sudden awakening to reality in relation to corruption in our world and inside Danish politics, whether this was a minister, an authority or an NGO, as well as international politics; EU, UN, WHO, WEF, etc.. I decided to take part in doing something about it. Firstly, I wanted to help expose the deceit and secondly I wanted to find solutions. As an engineer, I am trained in and have a good knowledge of the area of electronics and radio waves, and I have, as previously mentioned, worked for six years for the world's largest telecom company Ericsson. I therefore assumed that my contribution would be within my area of expertise. If you do not know what a smart meter is, then your house has, with 99% certainty, already had one installed, as these new socalled smart meters replace the analogue rotating disc power meters that measure the electricity consumption in a household. During my time as an activist in relation to electromagnetic radiation from smart phones, smart meters and 5G, I encountered an organisation which was trying to help the people solve the problem related to electromagnetic radiation (EMR). This organisation was the Inpower Movement. The film-maker Josh del Sol has made an award-winning documentary about Inpowers activities, which is centered around a Notice of Liability (NoL), that are making the perpetrating people in power, and their mindless minions, responsible in a legal way for their crimes against the common people.…Notice of Liability (NoL), that are making the perpetrating people in power, and their mindless minions, responsible in a legal way for their crimes against the common people.Inspired by Josh Del Sol's video and the founder of the Inpower Movement, Cal Washington, plus in particular two Danish sovereign advocates, I created an NoL in Danish which, in September 2020, was sent to all the members of the Danish parliament. This was done with the help from a lot of people, who also made donations making it possible to send the 170 ‘signed for’ letters with the NoLs to each individual politician. At the time I was collaborating with an organisation called Denmark Awakes (Danmark Vågner), which was headed by a certain Jette Toft. On their website you can view the names of all the members of the Danish parliament and mayors in Denmark, who have all received the NoL, and who has all signed for receiving the NoL by post, as the NoL has to be sent by recommended post, at least that is how we do it in Denmark. This was important in order to make them culpably responsible for putting smart meters in peoples homes and permitting the rollout of the 5G technology in Denmark. Included with the NoL they also received sufficient knowledge and information about smart meters and 5G to garner an understanding that the technology used in both instances is a crime against humanity. The NoL is quite a thorough document that makes the receiver of it commit to a self-executing contract. It is a legal jiu-jitsu way of handling the criminalities done by the people in power towards the common people. It is essentially a legal action done in total self-defence. Even so, the receiver of the NoL always ends up with large bills often amounting to hundreds of thousands to millions of US dollars that the receiver owes the sender of the NoL bill.When a point is reached when people will no longer suffer damage and abuse by the people in power, all the receivers of NoL - for instance a lot of politicians and government officials and other civil servants - will no longer be able to claim that they had not been aware that there was a problem so that they can’t claim ignorance. I strongly encourage you to join the Inpower team in your country and start sending NoLs to the perpetrators there. If Inpower has not yet established a presence in your country then I recommend that you contact Inpower and offer your help in setting up Inpower in your country, just like I participated in setting up Inpowers Danish organisation and in finishing the Danish version of the NoL.The NoL itself will make sure that a large part of the most evil and inhuman people in power - those who participate in invoking totalitarian measures on the people - will feel their consequences of their criminal actions. The NoL has been developed into a very comprehensive document that is near to impossible to neglect by the receiver. As the sender have proof through the post services registering of receipt, the sender of the NoL can always prove that the receiver did indeed receive the NoL. That is important as that makes it easy to establish that the perpetrators were made aware of the perpetrating actions they have participated in, and thereby have been made responsible for their cruel deeds. I am of course hoping, along with thousands of other representatives from the common people, that the perpetrators one day will be charged for their atrocities. When that day comes, the NoL is possibly the best legal evidence lying ready at hand for possible legal action.It is a tad bit ironic for me that I have learned so much from the Inpower Movement, but the knowledge I gained also have had the consequence that I no longer spent so much of my energy on the activism related to 5G and EMR. I still get contacted by people who want different forms of advice and help with smart meters, electromagnetic radiation and 5G towers. Cal Washington and his Inpower Movement opened my eyes to how extensive the deceit that the world's power elite are pushing on the people. Consequently I found it necessary that I gave my 5G activism a break. I felt I had to make a decision in relation to the use of my limited resources where they would have the most impact. The challenge to persuade the Danish population and the authorities that 5G is dangerous seemed many times greater than the challenge of exposing the deceit relating to the corona virus.So this is why I decided towards the end of 2020 to turn my focus from the 5G and EMR activism to a wider political perspective. I then also became convinced that the corona hoax and the lack of safety in relation to 5G and EMR were inseparably connected. This is also why Inpower Movement have created a NoL for three different areas: Smart Meter (Trespassing Technology), 5G and Vaccines. Even a fourth NoL is on the way dealing with geoengineering/chemtrails.In the autumn of 2020 I copied the thinking behind Inpowers NoL to use some of the same tactics to a more basic local Danish liability claim regarding the 5G roll-out, a much lighter document than Inpowers NoL. The aim was to apply immediate liability to participants in the state sponsored terrorising of the Danes. By omitting any financial implications (as is the case with Inpower Movements NoL) on the perpetrators, it becomes a lot easier, cheaper and less time consuming to send the liability claim to a wide range of perpetrators. Even without the financial implications it is merely a document that makes sure the receiver cannot claim that they were not aware of the bad decisions they have undertaken whilst participating in the overreach of power. Amongst the receivers of the Danish liability claim are ninety-eight mayors in all the local council districts of Denmark. Along with these mayors all the participating politicians and key civil servants of the Danish government have likewise received a liability claim making a lot of substantial legal evidences ready for a hopefully future legal showdown. In such a case none of the perpetrators are able to say that they did not know what they had participated in. The Danish liability claim helps declare that these criminals can be held responsible, and that we know that they are now informed so they also explicitly know that what they are doing is causing harm to other human beings. So when for instance a minister of health receives our Danish liability claim he or she will have a greater motivation to refrain from further criminal actions and from participating in the corona hoax at large. Indeed, the NoL’s and liability claims do promote the expression ‘they can run, or ignore, but they can’t hide.’Besides, it will be so much easier to convict the guilty in the arising court cases as ignorance cannot be claimed. As a reminder, to claim ignorance was exactly what the supporters of the Nazis did when the Germans had capitulated after the second world war. Almost an entire nation - directly or indirectly - supported the German National Socialist Party and the party leader Adolf Hitler. However, after the war many Germans claimed that they had not supported Nazism nor Hitler and that they were ignorant of the horrors in the concentration camps. If NoL’s and liability had been known at the time, they could have been sent to all who took part and they would have been liable and not able to claim ignorance and they would have had a higher chance of being convicted then. As we know from the proceedings in Nuremberg only a handful of Nazis were convicted for their crimes. It is horrific what a perfect analogy the 'corona pandemic' is to the early twentieth century Nazism. The two scenarios have so many similarities; populations are told that the government's assaults and restrictions on human rights are for their own safety, whether it would be Germans invading Poland, Czechoslovakia and/or Denmark or the lock-downs, corona tests, mask-wearings, restrictions of travel, restrictions upon the visitation of family members, corona passports and forced vaccination by way of coercion.Since the corona hoax unfolded as daunting as it did in 2020, I sensed that a Danish 5G and smart meter liability claim was not going far enough. Therefore I got behind a COVID-19 liability claim, which was sent to politicians, civil servants, scientists, doctors and nurses, all who have been involved in creating and enforcing the corona restrictions. This liability claim was put on the website

Nobel awarded scientist declares the PCR test useless for detecting viral diseaseAnother Nobel Laureate, Kary Mullis, has also helped expose the many lies that, let's call it the ‘mainstream narrative’, has used during the coronavirus pandemic.Biochemist Kary Mullis won a Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR test used to diagnose the HIV virus in AIDS patients. Before his death, he went to great lengths to state that the PCR test cannot be used therapeutically. In a video available on Odysee, he explains why the PCR test cannot tell us anything meaningful about whether the tested person is sick with a virus in connection with a positive PCR test.Unfortunately, Mullis died in August 2019, officially from pneumonia. This happened at a very convenient time for those who make money using the PCR test to test for corona. It is therefore important to emphasise that Kary Mullis has at no point made any specific statements about the PCR test and the corona pandemic, as he died before the pandemic. Instead, he has stated unequivocally that the PCR test cannot be used to test for diseases caused by viruses, for example.The PCR test is also very conveniently used by politicians who want to use the corona pandemic to shut down societies and take control of the population, as happened in Denmark during the lockdowns in 2020 and 2021. Here, the population was put at bay with the primary reason being that the number of infections was increasing, and the PCR test was used as an argument to declare many people sick without them being affected by the virus or disease in any way.Danish Associate Professor Emeritus Niels Harrit at the University of Copenhagen has created a 54-minute lesson in which he goes into great detail about how the PCR test works and the theory behind it. The lesson was videotaped and posted on YouTube, and Harrit explains the DNA and RNA theory behind the PCR test and why it cannot be used to test for COVID-19 disease as a result of a coronavirus attack. He also explains why it is called the RT-PCR test, where RT stands for both ‘Real Time’ and ‘Reverse Transcript’.As both Kary Mullis and Niels Harrit have validated, you can vary the number of cycles when performing a PCR test. And the higher the number of cycles, the higher the probability of finding coronavirus, for example. However, a positive test result does not indicate that the test subject is sick with coronavirus or any other virus.The “Quick Test” (lateral flow test) is even more uselessAccording to the Danish Health Authority, the so-called antigen tests, also known as the quick test, rapid test and self-test, are less accurate than the PCR test.If the inventor deems the PCR test useless for diagnosing coronavirus disease, and the Danish Health Authority states that the antigen test is less reliable than the PCR test, then why are politicians and health authorities so keen on testing for COVID-19 and basing their pandemic-fighting decisions on the results of testing the population? Could it be because politicians and health authorities are in the pocket of the giant pharmaceutical industry?On 16 February 2022, Politiken wrote an article about how poor these rapid tests are under the title ‘The worst test only caught 2.5 percent of those infected’. Although not all of the 46 different variants of rapid tests tested are quite as inaccurate as the worst one according to the article, it illustrates the Wild West market we are dealing with.It's also important to realise that if the authorities hadn't had the PCR and antigen tests to push out news of increased infection rates, we would hardly have had a scenario in Denmark that could be called anything close to a pandemic.I will discuss these dubious testing tools in more detail in a later section about the war-profiteering, longtime friends with the Danish King and deeply immoral businessman, Jeppe Handwerk, who, like the Falck Group, has earned staggering amounts of money selling tests to Danish authorities.Nobelitis - The Nobel diseaseOf course, it's hard for Big Pharma when Nobel Prize winners like Kary Mullis and Luc Montagnier reveal their profit-driven theatre tricks.So what does Big Pharma do? Well, they get some of their paid minions to slander the scientists in question to undermine their credibility. In the case of Kary Mullis and Luc Montagnier, they have both been unofficially diagnosed with Nobel disease, or Nobelitis.Apparently, it's a disease that affects Nobel Prize winners who become a little too critical of the mainstream narrative.Although there are officially no names of those who carry out this vile diagnosis, Wikipedia does see itself fit to publish an entire article mentioning Kary Mullins and Luc Montagnier among half a dozen other Nobel dissidents.Propaganda comes in many more variants than coronavirus.If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!):Links:Odysee video. Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR test, explains that the PCR test cannot be used to identify viruses:https://odysee.com/@action4canada:a/05-Kary-Mullis-Inventor-of-the-PCR-Test:fNiels Harrit, chemist, lic.scient. and Associate Professor Emeritus at the University of Copenhagen about the PCR test (in Danish):https://youtu.be/9IEhEaFgCI8Politiken 16 February 2022 ‘The worst test only caught 2.5 percent of those infected’ (in Danish):https://politiken.dk/forbrugogliv/sundhedogmotion/art8622146/Den-ringeste-test-fangede-kun-25-pct.-af-de-smittedeWayBack Machine copy of Danish Health Authority’s homepage discussing PCR and antigen tests: https://web.archive.org/web/20221219090201/https://www.sst.dk/da/corona/Test-symptomer-og-tidlig-behandling/Hvornaar-anbefales-test/Typer-af-test-du-kan-brugeWikipedia article on Nobel Disease:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_diseaseBigThink article on September 15, 2023 “Nobel disease: Why some of the world’s greatest scientists eventually go crazy:https://bigthink.com/the-past/nobel-disease-great-scientists-go-crazy/ Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe

Meet Dr Judy Mikovits, who stars in the film PlandemicOne of the more gruesome stories from the world of medicine concerns an American researcher Dr Judy Mikovits. Her story begins in 1982-1983, shortly after French virologist Luc Montagnier managed to make progress with the HIV virus. Dr Mikovits is part of a team that will confirm Montagnier's progress. The team will conduct a scientific study to confirm Luc Montagnier's discovery, and then both studies will be published to benefit other professionals in the scientific world and ultimately help save a lot of lives among those infected with HIV. So it's a race against time.But along the way, Dr Mikovits' team is pressured to let Anthony Fauci from the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) into the study they are working on. In the end, Fauci and his collaborators simply steal the information, or copy the study, and later publish their own study, which is a copy of the original. In doing so, Fauci also succeeds in delaying the most important discovery about HIV - which incidentally earned Luc Montagnier the Nobel Prize in 2008. According to Mikovits, Fauci's delay has caused the death of millions of people, especially in Africa. Fauci also succeeded in securing important patents relating to the HIV virus. The fact that a government official both owns patents on HIV and also works with HIV as a government official is an illegal conflict of interest, which, for some unfathomable reason, he will (apparently) never be convicted of.Anthony Fauci was part of the HHS management team that delayed the announcement of the discovery of the HIV virus. At the same time, Fauci was appointed head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) in 1984, a position he still held at the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic until the end of 2022.Dr Judy Mikovits has been called one of the most successful scientists of her generation. Her 1991 doctoral thesis revolutionised the treatment of HIV/AIDS and at the height of her career, she published a blockbuster article in the scientific journal Science. The controversial article sent shockwaves through the scientific community as she demonstrated how the fairly common use of human and animal foetal tissue in scientific experiments unleashes a plague of chronic diseases on humanity.The revelation of this controversial truth sent an army of Big Pharma's little minions after her, destroying her privacy, career and good name.Almost coinciding with the rise of the coronavirus pandemic, Dr Mikovits came forward to reveal the names of those behind the plague of corruption ravaging the pharmaceutical industry and humanity here on earth. And her story is terrifyingly hair-raising.The powerful pharmaceutical industry had Dr Mikovits arrested and muzzled, preventing her from telling the public the truth for 5 years. She was told that her tormentors would ‘find new evidence’ if she came forward, and so they would continue the destruction of her professional and personal life.Although she was imprisoned and her home was ransacked, no charges were ever brought against Judy Mikovits and she was never convicted in a court of law. Even when she was arrested, no arrest warrant was officially issued. The allegations that she did anything illegal are meaningless. On the other hand, Dr Mikovits has the names of 97 witnesses she wanted to testify, including Anthony Fauci, which would mean the truth would come out in an American trial. Instead, she was silenced.Or she was silenced for a period of time, because now she has come forward and pointed out that the coronavirus pandemic that hit the world in late 2019/early 2020 is just as manipulated by the same Anthony Fauci who was involved in the 1991 plot against the truth, which, among other things, caused the dark forces of the pharmaceutical industry to push her out of the good company.Her book ‘Plague of Corruption - Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science’ was published in April 2020 after her 5-year gag order expired. With life and health at stake, Dr Mikovits has now sacrificed everything to promote the truth that Anthony Fauci orchestrated the entire cover-up that, among other things, tried to destroy Mikovits when she told how millions of people have died from this great deception, which basically started with Luc Montagnier's otherwise amazing discovery of the HIV virus.Among the key backers, she names Anthony Fauci, who has been head of the NIAID since 1984, and Robert Redfield, who was head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from 2018-2021. These were the two most influential positions at the time when the US was responding to the coronavirus pandemic declared by the WHO in March 2020. And probably the two people who have had the greatest official influence on the entire world's response to the pandemic, with the possible exception of WHO Secretary-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who is discussed at lengt in other parts of this book.Shortly after her book is published, she is featured in the documentary film ‘Plandemic: The Hidden Agenda Behind COVID-19’. Dr Mikovits is interviewed by Mikki Willis and she tells her whole story and shows the connection to the coronavirus pandemic. YouTube has removed the film, but it can be found on the Odyssey video service.Despite the heavy censorship, the film ‘Plandemic’ won a Gold Award for Best Documentary at the European Independent Film Award (EIFA) in spring 2021.After its release, the film spread so quickly on social media that the pharmaceutical industry's minions, in a feeble attempt to stop the spread, had to make new fact checks that tried to refute and misinform about some of the claims in the film. Thus, the media PolitiFact made a fact check where 8 specific claims made in the book were criticised by PolitiFact. As is typical of these so-called fact checks, there is more misinformation than real information, which is especially the case here.What's interesting about PolitiFact's fact check being so effective in casting doubt on an award-winning documentary film is that you can find out who is behind PolitiFact. The Poynter Institute owns PolitiFact, and Poynter has received huge grants from Google and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which adds more than a little bias to PolitiFact's fact check.I have to warn against swallowing all of Judy's revelations uncritically, as she seems to miss a number of important points about viruses and vaccines. Omissions that raise my suspicion. But her story was part of the alternative media landscape in 2020 and therefore her story needs to be told here in this book.Mikki Willis and his otherwise critical Plandemic film should also be warned against. His approach to critical journalism seems to be limited to revealing only part of the limited, which could indicate that he consciously or unconsciously works as a so-called ‘limited hangout’.Mikki Willis‘ production company Elevate wasn't done helping to get Judy Mikovits’ story out there, as we'll see in the next section.Meet PhD David E. Martin, who stars in the film Plandemic IIMikki Willis, who interviewed Judy Mikovits in the Plandemic documentary, made a slightly longer follow-up to the award-winning film 4 months later, which was dubbed ‘Plandemic 2’ or ‘Plandemic: Indoctornation’.In Plandemic 2, Mikki Willis interviews PhD David E. Martin, a National Intelligence Analyst, who has previously developed analytical tools to detect patent fraud.In the 45-minute documentary, David Martin explains how the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been involved in building an industrial complex around the coronavirus since a previous coronavirus outbreak in Asia in 2003 until 2018. Anthony Fauci of NIAID (part of the CDC), Ralph Steven Baric, professor from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a long list of others affiliated with the CDC have taken out patents on the coronavirus and developed proprietary ownership of the coronavirus, the associated disease (COVID-19) and the detection tools to detect the virus/disease.But Dr David Martin's cardinal point in the arguments put forward is that you cannot patent a virus created by nature. This is against the rules on patents. Nature cannot be patented. And the CDC has just patented the coronavirus that has spread to humans. So either they have illegally patented a virus or they have violated international laws on biochemical weapons, which state that viruses that have the potential to attack humans cannot be developed in a laboratory.Since the tools to detect the coronavirus and the SARS-COV-2 virus itself are patented by the same group of people with Fauci and Baric at the centre, the coronavirus that has been fought since 2019 must have been developed in a laboratory.And again, for some unfathomable reason, the press and the one-sided fact-checkers seem uninterested in debating the different sides of the story. Despite the fact that Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier stuck his neck out and unequivocally stated that the Wuhan coronavirus originated in a laboratory. PolitiFact did an even lower quality fact check of the new documentary Plandemic 2 shortly after its release. This fact check didn't even touch on the fact that the CDC has been granted an illegal patent on a human-borne coronavirus, whether it was made in a lab or not!Plandemic 2 continues to shine a light on the great deception that citizens are subjected to by a media that fills them with untruths and attempts to claim the truth they are supposed to believe. There are very few companies that own a huge percentage of the media that create the news, and these companies include Comcast, News Corporation, Disney, TimeWarner, Viacom, and CBS Corporation. Their behind-the-scenes communication enables them to sell messages that unsuspecting citizens are indoctrinated with.Halfway through Plandemic 2, the documentary touches on the organisation that has been most pivota

Gene Therapy gone wrong!When you mess with things on the level of DNA and RNA, far-fetched theories of bodily chemistry (of which you may not have a clue), and your experiments with injections in human bodies, it would be quite predictable that there is a considerable chance that you’d do harm and make irreversible damage is it not? If you made enquiries (quite understandably, as these injections might hurt you) online on social media about this in 2021, there was a great chance that you'd be censored. Why? If mRNA jabs are not doing lasting damage (gene therapy gone wrong), they could just have refuted any doubts by presenting the evidence that the jabs were safe, and let the debate unfold. Truth should be able to manage and overcome critique, shouldn’t it? If we all have to be jabbed, the whole world and all, with a new technology, which are not tested extensively like other vaccines, really, it must be of the utmost importance to have the debate first and turn every stone. True? NO! Not according to the world's power elite and the health authorities that seemingly are controlled by this elite. You must understand that ‘they’ do this for your granny and grandpa and your safety. So that the contagion does not spread. So that we, as a population can ride off the pandemic without too many deaths. So that people should not suffer lasting consequences of corona. So that the hospitals should not become overwhelmed with other horrific consequences for the entire health system. Like the National Socialists, or Nazis, said during the second World War and the period leading to it: “Für ihre sicherheit!”. This phrase was used in a "Oprop" (High Alert) flyer which the Germans cast out over the cities in the days when they invaded Denmark. It was for the safety of our country. We were asked to understand that the Germans wanted to protect the Danes against the English. It is the same logic that Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen used in 2020-2022: "It is for your own safety", and the variants “It is for the sake of the elderly and the weak” and “Show a social mindset”. The Oprop flyers’ indisputable message is summarised in the last sentence: "For the safety of the country the German Army and Fleet will from now on secure against an English attack". If you replace "the safety of the country" with "the safety of the elderly" and "English attacks" with "Corona pandemic" and "the German Army and Fleet" with "restrictions and vaccinations", then, you will feel the fascist breath of history and probably even feel the shivers down your spine:"Restrictions and vaccinations will from now on ensure the safety of the elderly during the pandemic"Life is dangerous to live and there is enough to worry about. Except that the so-called vaccines would do more damage than they do good. There has never been much focus on the damage they can inflict. Those who do focus on this are excluded from the debate, both on social media and by the press in general. However, this question is the most pressing of all.Even doctors were censored on social media, however only the doctors who spoke out against the pandemic narrative. Anybody else, doctors, virologists and others could join the panel of 'experts', and were used industriously to make us wear masks, let ourselves be tested, or make us take a COVID-19 jab.The global COVID Summit (GCS) is an organisation, which on 17th May 2022 published its fourth declaration to the world. The event was filmed as a press meeting and broadcasted live via "The High Wire", as the mainstream media were strangely enough not interested. Seven doctors and scientists represented GCS at the press meeting and were in turn supported by 17,000 doctors and scientists. Dr Robert Malone was one of them who represented the declaration, and he spoke very clearly about the COVID-19 jabs.Eight minutes into the video from the press meeting, you can see and hear him conclude on the basis of the scientific investigations of the jabs. The scientist, who was at the centre when he invented the mRNA technology, explains that the mRNA-jabs will cause more damage than good and that they will not protect against contagion, as they were intended. He calls the jabs 'quasi-vaccines' and refers to these jabs being intended as a form of gene therapy, meaning that the recipient will have their genes altered. He is, as mentioned, backed by 17,000 doctors and scientists from around the world, so not just a small group of mad conspiracy-theorists then!Meet one of the Inventors of the mRNA Technology….By the end of the 1980s Dr Robert Malone and his colleague Philip Felgner stated that they were able to add RNA to living cells. This is why the scientist Malone is credited with having invented the mRNA technology. It demands special attention when an inventor of a technology warns the public that its application in a vaccine is dangerous and furthermore says that he suspects that this is gene therapy. Added to this 17,000 doctors and scientists back the statements. His warnings go directly against the narrative of the mainstream media where 'experts' state that the RNA material that is injected in the body disappears after a short while. But how do they know, we might ask, seeing as there was no long term testing done to document this? Dr Malone has his own Substack website with lots of informing articles and videos. Unfortunately I have later on had to revise my impression of Dr Malone and the two other doctors from the Global COVID Summit, Dr Peter McCollough and Dr Ryan Cole. This has to do with the jabs, 5G and the so-called 'Internet Of Things' (IOT) because all three of them apparently ignore essential facts in this regard. Towards the end of this book I will expand more about these technologies, and how they are related to COVID-19.Dr Charles Hoffe warns of Myocarditis after the Jab….Another doctor, who is also warning us against the so-called vaccines, is Canadian, Dr Charles Hoffe. After administering about 900 Moderna mRNA jabs to local Canadians of North American Indian origin, he learned that a lot of them had subsequently suffered injuries directly from the jab and therefore he pulled the emergency brake. Already in April 2021, he wrote a message to the local community in the village of Lytton to warn the population, and he addressed the county doctor for British Columbia at the same time. Dr Charles Hoffe's prompt reaction to help his patients had disappointing results. His practice was closed by the health authorities for the reason that he was causing 'vaccine hesitancy' in the population. This has happened to a lot of doctors, and other highly skilled medical practitioners all over the world.I remember having a conversation with a Danish doctor, who has a practice in the Copenhagen area and this person did not wish to enter into a discussion with me about the jabs, presumably because he knew I was correct about several or all of my claims. Instead he told me that it was up to me to solve this problem, referring to me being a politician, as he knew I participated in politics at that time. I was a little surprised by his way of how problems should be solved, but I also knew that doctors will do everything to keep their jobs.A few months after Dr Charles Hoffe's open letters to the locals and the authorities, the whole village mysteriously burned down including the hospital practice where Hoffe worked. It happened as a forest fire hit the area and wiped the village out on 30th June 2021. All of Hoffe's reports regarding the vaccine injuries were lost. The fire hit the world headlines, among which the ‘Guardian’ newspaper in England. The paper wrote a longer article about the catastrophe albeit a whole month later. The ‘Vice’ - an American Research Media - also wrote an article about the fire linking it to Dr Hoffe's reports of the vaccine injuries. Although I do not in general regard The Vice trustworthy, finding it a bit over the top and eager to create a good story at least they reported the catastrophic fire. The article rather strangely focuses on 'a grey bearded man without a shirt' who was ‘walking around’ and proclaiming that ‘a laser had caused the fire’. On the background of my experience as an electronics engineer, as previously mentioned, who has conducted a great deal of research into 5G, I know that Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) do exist. I just don’t know how often it is used by the authorities. It is certainly not beyond possibility that DEW-like technology could be used in the way the shirtless man tells us - that a giant laser would have set the village on fire. But the story seems to have been invented for the occasion, which I base on the fact that the shirtless man is suspiciously unnamed.But what I find really strange is that cars are completely burned down and their tyres melted, while smaller wooden structures closer than 10 metres from the cars are completely intact. Such fires do indeed indicate the use of DEW, which would at least explain why the cars caught fire and not the wooden fences standing right next to the cars. However, it would be a conspiracy theory if I claimed that DEW was used and that the fire in the village was man-made. Suffice it to say that there are circumstances in the story reported by the mainstream media that have some loose ends. Such fires point at the use of a Directed Energy Weapon. However, I am sure that it would be called a conspiracy theory if I claimed that a DEW set the village in question on fire and that the fire was man-made just because the people living there had suffered wholesale as the result of falling ill from side-effects of the Death Jab. It wouldn’t be too good for Big Pharma if that suddenly reached the world stage. Far better to nip it in the bud, surely…. I will content myself in pointing out circumstances and loose ends in this story from the mainstream media reports.Dr Charles Hoffe has carried on his activism and made several examinations of people j

Close ties between vaccine industry stateholdersBy the end of 2022 there were two approved COVID-19 vaccines in Denmark. Or rather, two approved 'so-called vaccines' for as I said before, they are not vaccines in the true sense that we normally understand by the term vaccines. These so-called vaccines do not make use of the traditional method in order to immunise the receiver, which is the established purpose of conventional vaccines. The American pharmaceutical manufacturer Pfizer has developed and produced the so-called COVID-19 vaccine, COMINARTY, (no relation to Moriaty – the baddie in the Sherlock Holmes books, surely….) in collaboration with the German pharmaceutical manufacturer BioNTech. The technology which is used in Pfizer's so-called vaccine is named mRNA technology. It was developed by Dr Robert Malone in the nineteen-eighties or, to be slightely more accurate, he set this technology in motion, and other scientists have developed it up until today. Ironically, Dr Malone himself vehemently warns us against the COVID-19 vaccines that are based on his own invention. Indeed, Wikipedia writes on their website that the inventor of the mRNA technology is spreading misinformation about his own invention…..Make of THAT what you will! I will return to Dr Malone in the next chapter.Pfizer have created a website where they explain the difference between the conventional vaccines and these new mRNA vaccines. A conventional vaccine is about that very little, or a very weakened extant virus, is injected into the body, so that the body's immune system recognise and overcome the limited and weak attack and thereby create and mount a concerted defense against another attack in the future. It is the whole purpose of the receiver of the vaccine to become immune towards the subsequent virus attack - immunised. This is not how mRNA vaccines are thought of or designed and this is why I and many others call them so-called vaccines. The term mRNA is an abbreviation of 'Messenger Ribo Nucleic Acid'. The theory is that if DNA (named Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid) is the instruction manual of the body, RNA is a page in this book, where the instruction for the individual cell in the body is written. The messenger RNA can somehow (re)instruct the cells of the body!? Then there are the genetic sequences which they claim they have for Sars-Cov-2. However this is a far claim and presented without any scientific evidence. The claim is then that mRNA technology is used in order for them to make the body's cells produce the so-called Sars-Cov-2 spike protein which is also a computer-drawn fiction, which in the microscope, the visible spikes are an effect of the chemicals which they apply to remove the gel coating from the cell. Of course, the more shrouded in science-babble the explanation is, the more the average person a) believes “the Science” b) couldn’t care less anyway and c) assumes that the ‘scientists’ are right, because, after all, they are (Bill Gates’ and WHO funded) scientists and much more clever than they will ever be, sitting in front of the BBC watching “Eastenders” and the like. Ye Gods! How easy it is for these people to get away with murder. Literally.This completely without evidence named ‘spike protein’, (let’s give it a fancy scientific name that people don’t understand as well!) which, according to this method gives our immune systems the ability to fight and reject the RNA virus Sars-Cov-2, corona virus, and this miraculously without the body becoming immunised….you could not make this up, could you? Oh looky here, they just did! Allegedly, by using the mRNA technology in a so-called vaccine, mRNA is injected in the body in order for the body to produce spike proteins (not proven to exist), so that the body's immune system is able to defend itself against corona virus (not proven to exist). This is the simple summary of a very long and windy explanation on Pfizer's website. Pfizer is registered on the stock exchange and the largest share owners are our familiar friends, Vanguard and BlackRock. Since 2016 The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has donated 135 million US Dollars, which is almost a billion Danish Kroner, or Crowns, to Pfizer. It's essential also to keep in mind that the BMGF makes use of both donations as well as investments in shares as their tools to get involved in an enterprise. Therefore these donations are only the tip of what we can see of the iceberg.For example, it is very fluid how many shares BMGF have in Pfizer. It is beyond any doubt that BMGF has shares in Pfizer as the information is on their “Strategic Investment Funds” website. However, what is not known, is how many.The other approved COVID-19 vaccine in Denmark is Moderna's “Spikevax” alleged vaccine. This is also called an mRNA vaccine. In 2021 you could read on Moderna's website that the enterprise regards mRNA technology as an operating system, like the software operating a computer. As Bill Gates has vast amounts invested in Moderna, it is a dry assumption that Bill Gates has now invested in his second operating system – this time one for humans! Whilst this may be a far-fetching statement, however I believe that it is closer to the truth than one would think. In true support of their evil intentions, Moderna has since deleted the page on their website including the statement describing the mRNA vaccine being like an operating system of the human body. But all is not lost and again, Praise the Gods and little chickens! The WayBack machine comes to our aid, as it has made a copy of the original webpage of the subterfuge for us all to see.What is the relation of Bill Gates to Moderna? It is, as said, impossible to find out how many shares BMGF have in Moderna and we do not know why BMGF does not declare anywhere the size of their donations to Moderna. Since this this book was published in Danish in 2023, both BMGF and Moderna, and surprisingly, also the WayBack machine has all deleted their copies of a press release stating that BMGF have a non-exclusive license agreement with Moderna related to the mRNA technology in the Moderna so-called vaccines. The BMGF inform us, still today, that they have a strategic collaboration with Moderna. However, they do not mention their non-exclusive license agreement in relation to the mRNA technology evident in this now long gone press release. Why ever not? Why it is that the international press has not written more about the Bill Gates’ relations to Pfizer and Moderna, when he also has such a great influence on the WHO, and subsequently on how the whole world reacts to pandemic outbreaks, where Pfizer and Moderna are brought forward as the ones to save us all with their vaccines? And why does Moderna no longer inform us of the details of their strategic collaboration with the BMGF? Why indeed? Is this because the public should not become too closely acquainted with the truth, which reveals that the regulating authorities in the different countries are influenced by donations? And that the same sponsors have, at the same time, have large investments in the companies that profit from the decision-making of the regulatory bodies during a pandemic? Anyway, we know that BMGF donates large sums to both the Danish Health Authority and to the State's Institute for Medicines, and that Bill Gates was also deeply involved in the (scandalous) sale of the vaccine factory of the Danish state. It has also surfaced in the UK that Bill Gates is the prime sponsor of the British vaccine approving authority, The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The alternative media, The Exposé wrote an article on 2nd September 2021 about the connection using a Freedom of Information request that they learned about. As described and documented in my previous chapter, Bill Gates has great influence on the WHO, who declared the pandemic in 2020. Could it be that the global elite wants to avoid the public learning about their plans to gain even more control over the populations and governments around the world? And that these so-called vaccines, with mRNA technology, are part of this power grab? This is irrefutably my own conviction and, in the coming pages and books - as if you needed any further persuasion - you will see a truck-load more evidence to back this 'conspiracy' up. Please note the difference between a conspiracy and a conspiracy theory! It is only a conspiracy theory if it has not yet been proven to be a conspiracy. In this particular case, it is quite evident that it is no longer a theory that Bill Gates long has been involved in a conspiracy with WHO and the vaccine manufacturers, particularly Pfizer and Moderna.The Danish Illusion is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!):Links:* Wikipedia page on Dr. Robert W. Malone: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_W._Malone* Pfizer explains the difference between conventional vaccines and mRNA vaccines on its website: https://www.pfizer.com/news/articles/what_makes_an_rna_vaccine_different_from_a_conventional_vaccine* Yahoo Finance shows the ownership of the publicly listed Pfizer: https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/PFE/holders?p=PFEThe Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has donated almost a billion danish kroner to Pfizer: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants?q=pfizer* Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's Strategic Investment Fund limited information about Pfizer: https://sif.gatesfoundation.org/investments/pfizer/* Moderna's argument on their own homepage that mRNA is a control system for humans found on WayBack Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20200501110214/https://www.modernatx.com/mrna-technology/mrna-platform-enabling-drug-discovery-development* Moderna and BMGF press release announcing that BMGF h

Meet Dr. Luc MontagnierDr Luc Montagnier received the Nobel Prize for discovering the HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) in 2008. He is also the co-founder of the World Foundation for AIDS Research. So, he was not a Dr. Anybody. He claimed, until his death in 2022, that the coronavirus that broke out in China was man-made in a laboratory, and that he was one of the first Western scientists to examine samples of the corona virus from China. His analyses were subdued by the main-stream media in spite of him being Nobel Awarded. An Indian media, CRUX, produced a fact-check divided into two separate stories about the statements of Montagnier, where they ‘corrected’ his probably most quoted statement during the pandemic: “The vaccines will produce new variants more deadly than the original.”Mass Vaccination is a Medical Error.By the end of this fact-check, CRUX quotes an Indian virologist Dr Kang who said that Nobel Awarded Luc Montagnier was spreading false news. This fact-check of Luc Montagnier has been re-distributed by many media outlets around the world, with other ‘virologists’ as experts over-ruling the Nobel-awarded doctor. It does seem that they have embarked upon an orchestrated effort in order to make the doctor as untrustworthy as possible.The BBC made a short obituary about Luc Montagnier when he died at the beginning of 2022. At ninety seconds long, the video mentions that, whilst Montagnier was a celebrated scientist, at the end of his life he had increasingly supported unscientific theories and was therefore on edge with the established medical community. However, he became popular in the anti-vax community, among others, because of his claim that the Sars-Cov-2 virus was man-made in a laboratory. But according to the BBC this is a false statement.In a previous interview on French TV, Montagnier is quoted for mentioning that Wuhan in China, where he thinks that the virus has come from, had so many 5G mobile masts erected that the electromagnetic waves from the masts could have caused the emergence of Sars-Cov-2. Montagnier only says that this is a possibility, not that he actually thinks that's what happened. However, he maintained to his death that the virus, which he had received from Wuhan, was man-made, as it contained sequences from the HIV virus, which could not have happened by chance in nature. Montagnier also knew that there was already research into corona-viruses going on in Wuhan. Therefore, based conveniently upon that, he presented his theory that they had been researching into an AIDS-type ‘vaccine’ and that the search had failed and that Sars-Cov-2 had escaped from the lab during the process. Montagnier's investigations and statements have been taken seriously by a large community because of his background as identifying the HIV, which in turn is recognised for being the virus that leads to the disease called AIDS.Please note: The above mentioned CRUX fact-check using Dr. Kang has been removed from the internet since the writing of the original book written in Danish. Other fact-checks are still available, i.e. Reuters fact-check from May 26, 2021 (se links).Links:Reuters fact-check of Luc Montagnier:https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/there-is-no-evidence-to-suggest-covid-19-vaccines-will-kill-people-by-causing-an-idUSL2N2ND0WS/BBC Obituary of Luc Montagnier the Nobel Prize winning French virologist on the 10th of February 2022:https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60340504 Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe

A “Crazy Deal”!?It is, of course, difficult to document that Bill Gates gives direct orders to key people in the Danish health sector but we know that the money-stream gives influence, for this is how capitalism works in the world that we have today. Let us begin by looking at the vaccine department at the state's institute of medicine. This entity was sold for nothing to someone as exotic as a Saudi Sheik back in 2016/2017, following a majority vote in the Danish parliament. Here is a translation of an analysis by the Danish mainstream tabloid ‘Ekstra Bladet’ from 2020.“Crazy Deal”“The Danish state sold the vaccine manufacturing output of the state in the summer 2016 for fifteen million Danish Crowns to the Saudi Sheik Abdulaziz Hamad Aljomaih, who took it over formally in January 2017. Solicitors PriceWaterhouseCooper had assessed that the state could have made a profit of up to 285 million Danish Crowns. Included in the deal the Sheik also received a discount on the rent of 200 million Danish Crowns. The state's solicitors has assessed that the cost to the state in connection with this sale will be around 1.3 to 1.8 billion Danish Crowns. They have also criticised that the conditions related to the securing of supply were not solved before the politicians created the basis for the deal. Both in 2004 and in 2011 cross-ministerial analysis concluded that Denmark was actually in a stronger position during epidemics with its own vaccine in-house manufacturing. Despite this pronoucement, Astrid Kragh, who, aided by the previous Minister of Finance, Bjarne Corydon, began setting up the sale of the state's vaccine factory in 2012. Not only did the Danish parliament, Astrid Kragh and (once more) Bjarne Corydon appear very dodgy in connection with this sale, it is also a deal which draws threads to Bill Gates. The vaccine factory was already funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2013. This can be seen on the website of the foundation, that 36 million US Dollars (a quarter of a billion Danish Crowns) were invested in AJ Vaccines A/S in October 2013. According to the Danish register of businesses (the CVR register) AJ Vaccines A/S was only registered for the first time in 2016. Before then the firm was called the Vaccine Department of the Danish Institute of Medicines. In 2016/2017 the department was segregated from the institute and sold as AJ Vaccines A/S to the Saudi Sheik.”The Danish tabloid also wrote another article about the donation by Bill Gates. In fact, the paper covered the entire sale quite extensively. It is certainly not pleasant fiction to get into the selling off of state assets and it reminds me of the sale of DONG (The Danish Offshore Natural Gas Extraction Company) to Goldman Sachs in 2014, where then finance minister Bjarne Corydon (here he is again!) also played a central part. What makes me really wonder is why the tabloid, after initially uncovering the foul-smelling swamp of corruption, does not dig deeper, especially when they discover that Bill Gates is involved. Surely if this tabloid, Ekstra Bladet, had been a truly critical media, who wanted what's best for the Danish population, they would have carried on with their critical coverage involving Bill Gates. Had they done so, they would have found out how deeply involved he is in the vaccine industry and in the WHO, which is an organisation that has the power to cover the vaccine industry in 24 karat gold leaf by declaring a pandemic. But maybe there are limits to how critical this otherwise critical tabloid can be? Maybe they were ‘warned’ to lay off? One of the really (far too few) critical media outlets in Denmark is the website of health coach Per Brændgaard. On 18th September 2020 he wrote an article with the title: "Bill Gates has bought Danish scientists for 160 million Danish Kroner". His article is about the large sums of money which the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation donates or invests in Denmark. Here is the list of their ‘donations’ to different institutions in Denmark:* The State Institute of Medicines (Statens Serum Institut), 1st July 2005: $14.889.455* University of Copenhagen (Københavns Universitet), 1st November 2008: $100.000* University of Copenhagen (Københavns Universitet), 18th November 2009: $3.484.384* University of Copenhagen (Københavns Universitet), 1st November 2010: $100.000* The State Institute of Medicines (Statens Serum Institut), 14th November 2011: $326.293* The State Institute of Medicines (Statens Serum Institut), 2nd October 2012: $158,739* City of Aarhus, 9th October 2012: $135,000* University of Copenhagen (Københavns Universitet), 10th October 2012: $813,050* The State Institute of Medicines (Statens Serum Institut), 15th November 2012: $551,049* University of South Denmark (Syddansk Universitet), 15th January 2015: $270,147* The State Institute of Medicines (Statens Serum Institute, 15th April 2015: $100,000* City of Aarhus, 20th December 2015: $85,000* University of Copenhagen (Københavns Universitet), 28th September 2017: $758,122* Danish Technical University (DTU), 25th November 2018: $1,084,000* The State Institute of Medicines (Statens Serum Institut), 3rd December 2019: $207,877* Maternity Foundation, 19th September 2019: $1,900,100* The Board of Medicines (Lægemiddelstyrelsen), 10th October 2019: $600,000In today’s currency, we can see that the total amount of investment is $25,563,216 or DKK 160,676,571. Since the article was written in September 2020 the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has donated further eleven million US Dollars to The State Institute of Medicines, which is way above seventy-seven million Danish Crowns. The media of Peer Brændgaard is an exception. The Danish press and other media have completely avoided writing anything critical about the activities of Bill Gates in Denmark. Contrary to this, they love to portray him as a pure saint, who is donating large sums to good causes. Unfortunately the less established media, like Per Brændgaard, do not have the means to carry out their journalism as effectively as if they had the extensive state support that most Danish mainstream medias get. So the battle to expose the dirty secrets is an uneven one. In essence "The zone is flooded", to make use of the expression of the CIA director from Event 201. The narrative of the press and the media is an area which I will be dealing with separately in my next book "The 3 Fictions" in a chapter with the title: "The Democratic Fiction".If you connect the facts explained above with the facts which I previously described about the donations of Bill Gates to the WHO in conjunction with the large sums invested in Moderna and Pfizer, you cannot stay silent. The Danes must know these facts, for these donations point out that the man is not an impartial philanthropist, as he even bragged to the CNBC that his investments in the vaccine industry had doubled his profits twenty times. These facts prove that we are caught in a vicious circle where Bill Gates and the other super-rich and their families have far far too much power. What is worse is that crises, like wars and pandemics, have (in all of history) made the richest one percent of one percent of the world's population even richer and the poor even poorer. This is often well proven. For example, Forbes Magazine wrote in July 2022 that the corona crisis has made the rich markedly richer. I find that it is an interesting and important question to ask whether or not it is likely that this rich elite make use of the financial power to grab even more wealth? Is this maybe what this corona ‘pandemic’ was really all about?If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!):Links:* Danish tabloid Ekstra Bladet wrote an article on July 31st 2020 regarding the sale of the Danish State’s vaccine production unit: https://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/samfund/danmark-til-grin-scorer-gigant-ordre/8221406* Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s homepage: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants?q=AJ%20Vaccines* Ekstra Bladet article on Bill Gates’s donations to AJ Vaccines A/S before the sale: https://ekstrabladet.dk/dagsorden/fik-ikke-besked-om-gates-donation-himmelraabende/8101653* Per Brændgaard’s article “Bill Gates har købt danske forskere for 160 mio. kr.”: https://perbraendgaard.dk/2020/09/18/bill-gates-har-koebt-danske-forskere-for-160-millioner-kroner* Bill & Melinda Gates Foundations grants for SSI 2019-2022: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants?division=Global%20Health&q=statens%20serum%20institut&yearAwardedEnd=2022&yearAwardedStart=2019* Bill Gates explains on CNBC, that his 10 million USD investment in vaccines has twenty-doubled: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/23/bill-gates-turns-10-billion-into-200-billion-worth-of-economic-benefit.html* Forbes article from July 22nd 2022 on the rich getting richer during the pandemic: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2020/07/22/the-rich-are-getting-richer-during-the-pandemic Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe

Danish Health Minister Magnus Heunicke in Washington during Event 201 When you, like I have been keeping an eye on the news and real events related to the corona pandemic during the past three years, you will encounter many strange coincidences. Amongst which is the (then) Danish Health Minister Magnus Heunicke’s visit to Washington and his meeting with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation occuring on exactly the same day as Event 201 took place. On the day, Magnus Heunicke posted a picture on Facebook showing him sitting in the Danish Embassy in Washington preparing for a meeting with the foundation. You can read about Event 201 and that it was televised to several locations outside New York, including Washington, where the simulation or table-top exercise took place. Despite this, Magnus Heunicke vehemently proclaims on social media that ‘he did not take part in Event 201’.Since then, as you might expect, he has deleted his post on Facebook. It seems completely unlikely that the Danish Health Minister was in Washington to meet the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation on the same day as their greatly planned pandemic simulation took place and that he did not take part in the exercise, or at least observed it or had a briefing about it. It appears completely illogical doesn’t it? Of course it does! However, there were many other important things on the agenda. Regardless of whether we argue over whether Heunicke took part in Event 201 or not, we do know that Bill Gates has a lot of interests invested in the Danish Health Sector. Indeed, it is worthy of further scrutiny to analyse his Foundation's ‘investments’ and ‘donations’ in Denmark in the coming chapter; but before that let us jump ahead in time to another ‘pandemic simulation exercise’, like Event 201, as a similar exercise took place in 2022.Catastrophic ContagionBoth the BMGF and the JHU must have found Event 201 such a great success—which we must admit it was, as they, by and large, accurately predicted a pandemic, which arrived only very shortly after. So wonderfully pleased with the outcome, like children let loose with the sweet-jar, they planned another table-top exercise in 2022. A shuffle around with the ‘organisers’ revealed that, in the prime seats was found to be the WHO who replaced the WEF, and thus they embarked upon the simulation, which they named “Catastrophic Contagion.” This was rolled out on 23rd October 2022. However, the scenario was staged sometime in the future, namely in 2025. There were not as many planned deaths as in the previous exercise as this time the main focus was upon the children dropping dead during the staged pandemic. Akin to Event 201, the fictional scenario was again a pandemic.In the simulation of this event, they estimated that there would be one billion infected and twenty million dead, of which fifteen million were children, and of the masses surviving the disease would have caused brain damage or paralysis anyway. The most successful countries to come out of the simulation were those who have invested in a preparation and rescue plan to meet the catastrophe. The simulation involved rescue and response units, which were ready constantly to counter the ensuing pandemic and which had regularly rehearsed their plans. The conclusion of the exercise was crystal clear: If only more countries had taken part in building a preparation and rescue operation..., it would not have looked as bad for them as the scripted scenario. (This is hard selling on steroids..) The organisers invited fourteen participants to carry out the table-top exercise making use of fictitious news casts and status reports. Among the participants was Bill Gates himself, together with a pot-pourri of different health experts and retired African health ministers and various vice health ministers. A video published by the organisers gave a three-minute summary of the exercise.This time we must really hope that the WHO, BMGF and JHU are not nearly as good at predicting future world events as WEF, BMGF and JHU were in Event 201 in 2019, so that this horrible, threatening but ultimately completely fictitious scenario will not be reproduced in reality. Much points at the world population being much more wised-up and that the WHO, BMGF and JHU are no longer able to conjure up the same spell on people, who are by now, hopefully much more sceptical of the restrictions, much of which were ignored in the UK, although not reported elsewhere! Furthermore, people are now much more sceptical towards the emergency-approved vaccines which are by now causing untold side-effects and deaths, and the ability of the pharmaceutical companies to profit on such ‘pandemics’. When we get closer to 2025 and this new pandemic may appear, in whatever form it will take, we will see how much of a lesson the world's population has learned. I wonder if, by that time, people will at last understand that they are just mere pawns in the games of the globalists?If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!):Links:* The organisers behind Catastrophic Contagion’s homepage for the table-top excercise: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/exercises/2022-catastrophic-contagion/index.html* The organisers behind Catastrophic Contagion used this informing short video in their table-top excercise: Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe

The fortune teller Ida Auken about owning nothing and being happyThe WEF's connections to Denmark are manifold. Pretty well all the Danish prime ministers in recent times have been affiliated with the WEF and both the then Crown Prince, now King Frederik 10. and his wife Queen Mary, have long been part of the ‘Young Global Leaders’ programme of the WEF. Despite the posh competition it is still the bilderberger Ida Auken, who admittedly ranks as the greatest advocate for the WEF in Denmark. She wrote - allegedly herself - an article in 2016, which was published on the WEF's website and on social media. What made the article famous or infamous if you like, was the infamous words that have now got an entrenched reputation: “You’ll own nothing. And you’ll be happy”. The original article can be found on the Wayback Machine, as Ida Auken herself, or the WEF, or both together first ‘edited’ the article and then later completely removed it from the website. I do wonder why? Both happened at the start of 2021, when the corona-pandemic, according to later statements from Ida Auken, made ‘conspiracy theorists’ mix her predictions together with ‘The Great Reset’. As you would expect, she has never explained why the article has been removed, and this fact alone is worthy of my further attention, later. In the edited article it can be seen that the WEF, or Ida Auken herself, or both, has done some damage control and attempted to dumb the article down, for example by changing the title from “Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better” to the less controversial “Here's how life could change in my city by the year 2030”. Auken's original article was reprinted by Forbes on 10th November 2016, so fortunately it can also be found there. You can also still find the launch page of WEFs “Eight Predictions for the World” on their official website, where Ida Auken's article was the first of the eight predictions for the world. Interestingly enough, if you click on Ida's article, you will see that it is no longer on the website. It has simply been deleted, almost certainly because of growing criticism and mounting ridicule. However, you can still view Ida Auken's “Own nothing, be happy” statement in the launch video at the bottom of the page.The WEF removed a post on social media of which the video was part, supposedly because it went viral with negative comments about the WEF. It is interesting to realise that these eight predictions, which allegedly should have been done by eight different contributors, seems to have been coordinated quite accurately with the goals which the WEF is still working towards, now, seven years later. Either the WEF has been unbelievably lucky using accurate fortune tellers, like Ida Auken, to contribute in 2016, or it was paid work, or at the very least carefully coordinated and planned contributions from Ida Auken and the other seven. Ida Auken was at the time part of the WEF's Global Future Councils, and it is possible that the seven other writers were too. This could explain how well coordinated their future tellings were. On the day of the opening of the Danish Parliament, Folketinget, on 4th October 2022, I met Ida Auken in front of Christiansborg (the parliament building). I asked her how great the influence on Danish politics the WEF has. "Nothing!" she says and shortly after, she says the same thing about the Bilderberg group. Then I asked her the question “then, why is she part of both organisations, if they do not have any influence on Danish politics”? To this she answers that she is part of both because she can have influence on the organisations in order for her to make them do something for the climate! This is a strange backward logic that Ida is making use of here. Why would she spend time on organisations which, according to herself, have no influence on a country like Denmark? These people just lie, and lie and lie. In fact, it reminds one of the oft quoted phrase; How does one know when a politician (or, in this case a spokesperson for the WEF) is lying? The answer, of course is, when their lips are moving.It is also slightly strange that Ida Auken had to travel to the WEF and Bilderberger meetings, and then just fire away some random points about the climate, whereby she gains influence on the climate area. Which then, after all, as she maintains, has no influence on Denmark, and therefore, I guess, not on any other country either? Unless, of course, if it was the case that all other countries are so helplessly far behind Denmark that they learn a lot from Ida Auken’s utterances about the climate. Who knows what is going on in the head of Ida Auken? I cannot fathom the logic. You can view the short interview with Ida 19 minutes and 30 seconds in a YouTube video “Folketingets åbning 4. oktober 2022” on my YouTube-channel (it's in Danish). What is the reason that the WEF and Ida Auken do not stand by their article from 2016? Is this about that there are too many critics, who have seen right through it all and realised that the WEF is a great proponent to support that the world should go through a great reset and thereafter introduce a one world government? And also that this collaboration between global institutions like the EU, UN, WHO, NATO, the World Bank institutions and many more are not playing with open cards with the world's population?Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better(the original quotation from the first Ida Auken-article)During the Danish election for parliament in 2022, TjekDet (the Danish fact-checker organisation) found that they had to fact-check the leader of a new Danish political party Pernille Vermund. This new party is called ‘Nye Borgerlige’. Pernille Vermund made a post on social media that had criticised the WEF for seeking to assume the right to own property from people, on the back of Ida Aukens article. TjekDet made supposed 'experts' comment on the post in order for them to make a concerted negative fact-check of Pernille Vermund. What they did not do, which was a major journalistic blunder, was to ask the WEF. However TjekDet believe themselves to have the ammunition they need to shut Pernille Vermund down. These fact-checkers are nothing more than self-elected judges of opinion and I deem them utterly revolting. This is especially heinous considering that Danish tax payers have paid millions for their services; voicing the false narrative of the globalists, twisting and falsifying their fact-checks. Regarding this specific fact-check, Ida Auken herself was an 'expert witness' but was not even asked, which makes the whole affair even more dodgy. There are several links to her article, however not the original one from WEF's website. But on the WayBack Machine you can find copies - and TjekDet seem not in the least concerned as to why the article, that their 'fact-check' is about, is no longer on the website of the WEF where it was first published!So it is clear to see that all this is not of any interest to TjekDet, who must have fallen into a deep journalistic slumber while they were in the process of their 'fact-check'! I think that TjekDet has, once more, contributed to a taxpayers money consuming, globalist agenda pushing, brain washing and misguiding article! Another globalist-friendly media Politi-fact did a fact check in English, as did Reuters and a lot of other fact-check medias. All of them totally obfuscating simple facts and adding total confusion to the mix of Globalistic Social Liberalism, which is the actual political ideology of the globalists. Ida Auken's bare-faced cheek that she uses to massage the globalistic social liberalism into the minds of the population, leaves me disgusted. It seems to only spellbind a fast falling number of the population, falling as the total population slowly begin to realise how these actor politicians are caught in the game of the globalist marionette theatre. I wonder, if politicians, like Ida Auken, know that they are being played? I sometimes wonder even more, because she sometimes plays her part so well, as the politician who wants a lot of good things for her country and for the climate. I further wonder that, if she is so into playing her part, she actually believes in the spin herself? It would be truly frightening, if that were the case.Founder of WEF, Klaus Schwab, is more direct in his communication in his “penetrate (s)the cabinets”-interview from September 20, 2017 at Harvard Kennedy School:Links:* Wayback Machine’s copy of Ida Auken’s original WEF article regarding owing nothing but being happy: https://web.archive.org/web/20161125135500/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/shopping-i-can-t-really-remember-what-that-is* Wayback Machine’s copy of Ida Auken’s edited WEF article (later it was completely erased): https://web.archive.org/web/20210427224934/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/how-life-could-change-2030/* Magasinet Forbes also made a copy of Auken’s original article on the 10th of November, 2016 (the original article, but it has been deleted, so below is the copy from Wayback Machine!): https://web.archive.org/web/20161111145258/https://www.forbes.com/sites/worldeconomicforum/2016/11/10/shopping-i-cant-really-remember-what-that-is-or-how-differently-well-live-in-2030/#7da0a5ee1735* WEF’s homepage when launching “8 predictions for the world” on Wayback Machine.: https://web.archive.org/web/20161125144156/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/8-predictions-for-the-world-in-2030* TjekDet fact-check of Pernille Vermund on the 27th of October, 2022, regarding WEF: https://www.tjekdet.dk/faktatjek/pernille-vermund-vaekker-konspirationsteoretikerne-midt-i-valgkampen* PolitiFact fact-check on Ida Auken’s statements and WEF “World Economic Forum “elites” are pushing the Great Reset, which aims to control people by taking all their possessions.”: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/sep/28/instagram-post

“Event 201” Event 201 took place on 18th October 2019 and the organisers were the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and John Hopkins University. Besides these, the George Soros controlled firm, ‘Open Philanthropy’ also donated considerable funding. Although fact- checkers (who it would seem are funded by the very organisations they purport to ‘fact-check) categorically deny that Event 201 was an exercise which predicted the corona virus outbreak and the following pandemic, is it close to mind to suggest exactly that. Later on, we will look at the role which the press and the media played in relation to the three fictions used to brainwash the people. There is great humoristic value in looking at the Danish fact-checking institution ‘Tjek Det’ and their fact-checking of the rumour that Event 201 indeed predicted the pandemic. Their fact-check was issued on 27th of April 2020. It first drew in the wildest accusations from the side of the critics, to then produce a complete debunk of the very idea that Event 201 by any means predicted the pandemic, so that the reader is left with the impression that ‘there is nothing to see here’. There is, of course, plenty to see here!It was put forward that Event 201 was a so-called ‘table top exercise’, a simulation if you like, of a scenario that 60 million people die from a ‘pandemic outbreak’. Of course, even the most dim-witted individual cannot possibly ignore that this simulation was all too similar in so many ways to the corona virus ‘outbreak’ which the media reported took place in China only just a few months later. So much so, that the organisers have had to distribute a press release to assure everyone of the opposite. That Event 201 receives so much critisism from the corona sceptic faction in different countries around the world, is connected to the fact that the organisers are from the same organisations who rolled in the gold during the pandemic and at the same time were the ones to predict it. Besides this damning situation, several experts have presented further evidence supporting that the corona virus is made in a laboratory. Yet still others have questioned the very existence of the virus at all, one individual offering anybody a million euros to actually provide proof of the isolation and make-up of this supposed ‘virus’. To date, this has not been claimed as not one individual or company has ever actually done this. Amongst these nay-sayers was the now deceased Nobel Price awarded virologist Luc Montagnier. I will get back to him, as he is not just Mr anybody, since he actually received the Nobel award for identifying the HIV ‘virus’ and the related disease ‘AIDS’. Indeed, this ‘Event 201’ was only just one way in which the prediction and the carrying out of this so-called Corona Virus Outbreak came to fruition.Bill and Melinda Gates likewise predicted the pandemic during an interview, where they are seen to be even smiling, both of them, as Bill reveals his ‘news’. During a meeting at the World Economic Forum, Prince Charles, the Prince of Wales, now King Charles, has threatened the world's population that more pandemics will come, if the WEF did not build a ‘sustainable’ world. In 2017 and 2018 (before there was any mention of a ‘pandemic’) millions of PCR test kits were exported to the world's countries, including to Denmark. In 2017 Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infections Deseases (NIAID) in the USA, guaranteed that more surprising ‘outbreaks’ were on their way within the next four years. Five months ahead of the ‘pandemic’ the WHO requested that their 193/194 member states should prepare for a coming pandemic. These happenings, and many more, are described and documented in a video from Stop World Control which was published in May 2022 with the title "Proof that the pandemic was planned with a purpose". However, perhaps most clear and trustworthy evidence that Event 201 is a part of a wider conspiracy, came from no less than the nephew of (murdered) US President John F. Kennedy; Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He published a book in 2021 with the title "The Real Anthony Fauci". The book consists of some 600 pages which chronicle Anthony Fauci, who is the American equivelent of his Danish counterpart Søren Brøstrøm. Of course, Fauci naturally has a much greater responsibility than the director of the Danish Health Authority’s Brøstrœm. Besides being the director of previously mentioned NIAID, Fauci (a.k.a Dr. Death, as he is nicknamed in the UK) is also the chief medical advisor to the President of the USA. Kennedy’s book can also be viewed in a film version, lasting one hour and fifty minutes. It can be found on ‘Odysee’, as YouTube is unfortunately censoring (actually banning) it.The film goes through Event 201 from around three and a half minutes in and, after six minutes, Robert F. Kennedy points at the peculiar fact that the second-in-command at the CIA, Deputy Director Avril Haines, is one of the ‘hosts’ at the simulation. You may well ask; ‘What is the secret service of the USA doing at a simulation of a pandemic outbreak’? You may further ask, ‘why is the CIA so interested in the training and preparation for a pandemic, that they send their second in command to co-host the event?’ Haines makes use of her hosting role at Event 201 to underline that 'misinformation' cannot be avoided, and that a 'flood zone strategy' should be applied to counter it. Every attempt was made at the event to ensure that the concerted narrative was propagated everywhere and the only one which should be heard, making it extremely hard for any normal inquisitive individuals to receive other information than what was fed to them via the established media. A line of other experts, even military experts, also take part in the simulation and add their voices to attempt to silence the vaccine sceptics. People must be forced to believe the WHO, their governments and the pharmaceutical industry, these organisations even involving their countries’ secret services to ensure that this can happen as smoothly as possible without too many complications in relation to any so-called 'misinformation'. What in the name of all that is Holy was going on?The Bill & Melinda Gates FoundationBill Gates is one of the world's richest men because he controls a ‘foundation’ with the largest wealth in the world. He is also a man plagued by his past within the software industry and his firm Microsoft, where he made his money. However, he also had to spend a great deal of his valuable time answering court cases in relation to unethical business methods. He has avoided paying tax on his fortune and now he calls himself a philanthropist. What could possibly go wrong? One thing is clear. When you question whether or not Bill Gates is a philanthropist or a tax avoider, it is important to keep in mind that it would seem that the foundation has redefined the term philanthropy from being understood as giving money from a good heart, into investing a large part of the ‘donation’ in a company by buying up its shares. According to a CNBC article from September 2019, 60% of BMGF's assets are invested in shares and although the foundation had ‘donated’ 36 billion dollars over the last couple of decades, it has still increased its wealth.Another CNBC article from January 2019 focusses upon the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos in January 2019, where Bill Gates explains that his best investment ever is his investment in vaccines which has increased in value by a factor of twenty(!!) in ten years. In relation to looking into what could possibly go wrong, it is lucky for us sceptics that the BMFG has a website informing us how their money is distributed. Similarly, the WHO also has a website informing us about who their sponsors are. As previously documented, the BMFG donated between 17% and 22% of the total budget of the WHO in the period 2016 to 2021. It looks like it was also carrying on in 2022. In October and November 2022 alone, BMFG donated more than 90 million U.S Dollars to the WHO. This is the same as 630 million Danish Crowns, donated in just two months! Surely they wouldn’t be making donations on a whim without expecting anything back? Remember also that the BMGF cannot buy shares in the WHO as the organisation is not a shareholder-owned company. Well, of course, Bill Gates did get it his way. Let’s go back to the candidate he wanted for the DG of the WHO, Tedros Adhanom. Let’s also go back to the fact that China was also in support and agreement for this ‘candidate’. It turned out that Tedros Adhanom has known Bill and Melinda Gates for many years. While Tedros was Health Minister in 2010 to 2014, their foundation donated 1.5 billion US Dollars (over 10 billion Danish Crowns) to a 'family planning project' in Ethiopia. Again, not something the mainstream media finds worth mentioning. The previously mentioned Fox News article from 27th March 2020 uses the bulk part of its page space to ask questions about Tedros' past and his rather too much enthusiasm for covering up China's poor handling at the beginning of the crisis. It seems that even Fox News dared not focus on the wanton corruption of the WHO by Bill Gates. We need a more alternative media for that before we can muster enough courage to challenge the inappropriate close connection between Tedros and Gates. See, for example an article from Brightwork Research & Analysis from November 2021. Tedros Adhanom is also part of an advisory board in a Fund for Global Health which, likewise, receives potent donations from the BMGF. Besides, the CEO of the Fund for Global Health was the previous head of the department for Global Health Policy in the BMGF. Again, this is not something which the mainstream media bother (or dare) to report. It looks suspiciously like Bill Gates does not have to ask Tedros Adhanom for any favours, does he? Tedros already knows full well who’s pocket he lives in and it ma

Readings from the book The Danish Illusion by Flemming BlicherThe WHO Director-General Charged with GenocideIt was indeed Bill Gates who supported the election of Eritrean-born Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus for Director-General, the highest post in the organisation of the WHO.  China also supported this ex-minister from the government of Ethiopia. Dr Ghebreyesus has a Doctorate of Philosophy (PhD) in Community Health from the University of Nottinghamhy.As a curiosity it can also be mentioned that Dr Ghebreyesus sat in the Ethiopian government as health minister representing a Marxisistic-Leninistic party, the Tigrayan People's Liberation Front (TPLF). His communist past certainly correlated well with China supporting him for the post.As if this is not controversial enough, that the Director-General comes directly from a communist party, Adhanom is also charged at the International Criminal Court in the Hague (ICC) with committing genocide at the time when he was in government in Ethiopia. It was the Nobel's Peace Prize awarded American, David Steiman who actually managed to press the charges via the ICC. In England, The Times, The Daily Mirror and The Daily Star have all written about the court case. At the time of first writing this book (November - December 2022) the case has not yet commenced. The judge at the Hague court has demanded more expanding evidence and the case is still being prepared here in October of 2024. However, what is indisputable is that the TPLF is a terror organisation, banned by the current Ethiopian government.  This fact has been documented by many Western sources.The British freelance journalist, Graham Peebles, who has been involved in educational programmes in Sri Lanka, Ethiopia and India since 2005, has written an article about the TPLF's terror activities published by ‘Counterpunch’. He writes that the TPLF is a terror organisation which has recently taken up terrorism again after the organisation lost power in Ethiopia in 2018. It also explains that western support for the TPLF, especially from the USA, UK and some EU countries, is the reason that this terror organisation could show enough military power to start a civil war in the country. This confirms how western countries have traditionally caused and created unrest in Africa, especially in the countries south of Sahara. It seems that they are doing this deliberately for their own gain. In one of the media channels to which the Peebles article is also referring, Voice of America (VOA), one can read an entirely different version article about the TPLF's new military offensive in Ethiopia's Tigray region. In the article, we can read that (believe it or not) it is no less than Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus who is quoted giving a verbal attack on the western countries and the Ethiopian government for not doing enough to help create peace in the country…It is extraordinary that Adhanom is not at all critical towards the TPLF. The article also exposes how the western media twists reality. The article also fails to mention that Tedros is one of the former leaders of the TPLF. In fact, the TPLF is not specifically mentioned in the article, at all, with only an indirect reference as the "Tigray Rebel Forces". This is how the reader is misguided in getting the mistaken impression that it is the rebels in Tigray who are the good guys in the conflict, which goes absolutely against the far more trustworthy eyewitness testimony of Peebles. This type of exclusion of the facts also contributes to the majority of the populations of the WHO member states being completely unaware of the charges against Tedros at the court in the Hague. In general, not much is written about the charges he faces and whilst the case is under preparation, the TPLF continues its western-supported criminal terror activities in the Tigray province of Ethiopia. Geographically, this province has boundaries to Eritrea which also has a secondary role in the conflict.So then, it can be seen that much points to the Director-General of the WHO and his conviction of genocide. The possibility alone that this can happen surely ought to make all the journalists in the world sharpen their pens. However this is not happening! It is still very limited as to how much is being written about the case in the mainstream media and I will get back to why this is so in a later section about the Press - the fourth state power. However, at this juncture, I will conclude this chapter by putting forward an article by Fox News from 27th of March 2020, where great doubts about Tedros Adhanom are raised, both in relation to his time as minister in Ethiopia and also to China's inadequate and dubious response at the beginning of the corona outbreak in Wuhan. The article also questions the CV of the Director-General which is found to be inflated and misguiding.Benevolent philanthropist or cynical tax avoider?At this juncture, let us return to the person who took part in installing Tedros Adhanom as Director-General of the WHO and who, more than any other, has had a finger in the pie in relation to the corona pandemic. It is of course no other than Bill Gates. People have been well programmed to view him as a philanthropist and to react with disbelief when so-called conspiracy theorists dare to doubt his philanthropic intentions in relation to the pandemic. However, where there’s smoke, there’s fire and in the following section, the information I propagate about Bill Gates will be completely substantiated with related links to sources in the footnotes, so that you can form an opinion of both sides of the story. Of course, I will naturally focus on the side of the story which is not told by the mainstream media.Although most people know who Bill Gates is, for the sake of accuracy and understanding, let me draft his background anyhow. Not only is he (via his foundation) one of the world's richest men, he is also a philanthropist. That is the impression you get from reading about him online and listening to what mainstream media say about him. A philanthropist, according to the Danish dictionary, is a person who unselfishly works to help his fellow human beings, especially by making donations to good causes. Through the Microsoft empire, Bill Gates made a lot of money, especially during the 1990s and the early 2000s. Microsoft had developed a software platform which became the dominating operating system for virtually every computer, tablet, and other means of electronic communication on the planet. At the end of his time as the top executive at Microsoft he went through long, humiliating and exhausting lawsuits; in 2000, he stepped down from the position of CEO of Microsoft and finally made the decision to place the bulk of his assets from Microsoft into a ‘foundation’ which is known today as the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation. He also withdrew gradually until 2020, he finally left the board of directors, although he still spends about 10% of his time at its Redmont, Washington headquarters, meeting with product teams, he says. By placing these assets in a ‘foundation’, these are no longer registered as a personal fortune. It's a manoeuvre which the oil baron John D. Rockefeller paved the way with more than one hundred years previously. This means that a billionaire who makes use of this loophole or ‘trick’ is exempt from paying tax on the accumulated wealth. In the case of Bill Gates he got away with not paying tax on about 80 billion dollars! Now, by any stretch of the imagination, that is a lot of money which the tax authorities in the United States of America have failed to collect and an awful lot of money which could have gone into the public coffers to benefit the wider population in general. Maybe one could argue that the country will benefit from the money in the shape of charity, will it not? I maintain that this is far from certain! All that will happen is that this ‘foundation’ which the money has been transferred to could just end up becoming richer and richer over the years. Even though the foundation on the surface is a charitable not-for-profit organisation, shrewd investment in, e.g. the weapons industry and chocolate producers can increase the foundations assets; And this is exactly what the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is being criticised for doing; accumulating wealth from dubious industries and using this wealth to apply pressure on American legislators. A great trick exploiting a loophole for the super-rich to avoid paying tax on their profits.In the case of the chocolate investments the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have been criticised for their investments in the chocolate giant Mondelez, which is known for using chocolate from cocoa farms using child labour. Judge yourself how philanthropic you think Bill Gates is, when you can read in an article from 2019 in Jyllandsposten and Politiken (two Danish mainstream papers) that Bill Gates is becoming richer and richer by being a philanthropist. According to the article his fortune increased with the net value of 16 billion dollars during a period in 2019, when he was supposed to donate 35 billion to charitable causes. In the same article you can read that amongst these ‘charitable causes’, which Bill Gates has invested in over time, is GAVI, the vaccine alliance which he founded himself. This is the same alliance which donates large sums to the WHO. I wonder if this is without getting anything in return? Bill Gates says himself that he has a strategy which is about owning a large part of stocks in the companies that he donates to or invests in. The wealth which is used to surround Bill Gates with a saint-like glow in most media that write about him, is not necessarily really charity that benefits the people. It is more likely benefiting himself.Those who achieve the greatest benefit from making use of the Rockefeller trick are primarily Bill and Melinda Gates who have enormous sums at their disposal. They use t

Readings from the book The Danish Illusion by Flemming BlicherWill Novo Nordisk be the next vaccine giant?The Danish Ministry of Health and the Danish Corona Corruption(Part 2 - continued from previous section)It can therefore be seen that one does not have to be a very critical thinker to see the pattern in this whole charade, as the cards can can be summarised as follows: • Per Okkels is apperantly asked to knock his health director into place, allegedly because director Søren Brostrøm is not supportive enough about the government's corona narrative, explicitly expressed in “the extreme precautionary principle”. Okkels is likely asked by one or more non-publicly known backers – possibly the prime minister, a head of department from the prime minister's office, a minister for health and the elderly or a fourth person – Or are we to believe that Okkels does the knocking completely on his own initiative? • Half a year later, Per Okkels gets a golden ticket to a comfortable and lucrative transition to his pension via a part-time position in the incredibly rich Novo Nordisk Foundation • This is a smart move to hide this wrongdoing, as the new head of department cannot be blamed for the deviation from professionalism and deviation from the 'proportionality principle', which has probably subsequently already become commonplace practice in the Ministry of Health. Per Okkels cannot be blamed either, or at least wont experience any repercussions, as he has retired.• In addition, Per Okkels' new organisation is the Novo Nordisk Foundation which suddenly, from March 2022 and less than twelve months after Okkels joined the foundation, embarks upon major development work together with Bill Gates on the development of new antiviral medicine. Not insulin as is the company’s field of expertise, but antiviral medicine! • The project is called "Pandemic Antiviral Discovery" (PAD) and aims to catalyse discovery and early development of antiviral drugs for use in future pandemics. PAD is used for the development of vaccines, even though the word 'vaccines' is not mentioned at all, neither in the Novo Nordisk Foundation’s nor the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's press releases. The project raises 90 million dollars (600 million danish kroner) in 2022 for their vaccine adventure and a triple amount (1,8 billion danish kroner) in 2024.• In the meantime, the Danish Medicines Agency's director Thomas Senderovitz has also switched to Novo Nordisk after ensuring that the first COVID-19 vaccines are approved for emergency use in Denmark. Also in that position, it offers certain advantages that there is a change of director, so that any responsibility becomes more difficult to place when the population begins to understand that these vaccines were planned right before the corona outbreak in Wuhan. The responsible backers are trying to muddy the picture, so as to make any eventual legal responsibility much more difficult to place. In this termite’s nest of deception, try to get the average Dane to think about who can be held responsible for what happened? Quite difficult, isn’t it?Even Søren Broström has after all just followed an order from his head of department and probably got a hint with a red-hot poker to join in the charade. In addition, that same Autumn, Brostrøm was offered a top WHO position to boot. Dagens Medicin writes that, on the 28th of October 2020, Søren Brostrøm will, from May 2021 become part of WHO's global board. Even the minister who is responsible for what is going on seems to be quite happy reaping the fruits of his ill-gotten labours.Health Minister Magnus Heunicke will be honoured by Berlingske and Kantar Gallup in July 2021 as the most popular minister in the government that sat until the general election of 1st of November 2022, more than a year and a half after the start of the corona escapade. Following this, Heunicke also secured another ministerial post in the scandalous SVM (coalition) government of December 2022.As described above, the Danish health authorities have, from the early start of the corona pandemic, emphasised politics over professionalism. Previously I described how the responsibility for the scandal will be difficult to place, and that those involved are thus relatively well-protected against negative consequences and possible criminal charges because of their participation. Furthermore, the industry is owned by the same company-rich elite, regardless of which industry we are talking about. As long as there are pandemics, crises and wars, this elite makes a lot of money at the expense of the world's population. The corruption works so subtly in today’s Danish politics that the parties to the shady ventures do not even need to exchange suspicious thick envelopes containing large banknotes under mahogany tables. With a barely concealed ironic allusion to my previous section on the mobile networks, the described corruption can be called a type of corruption (almost second-generation corruption, if you like) where the envelopes of money may be the original first-generation corruption. Second-generation corruption is a much more subtle corruption, which I believe to be a prevailing form of corruption that is increasingly now taking place in Denmark. With regards to prime minister Mette Frederiksen’s and the then minister of health and the elderly Magnus Heunicke's roles in this case, I will return to this at the end of the next chapter.When I touch on corruption, the pandemic and the WHO, I must also address Bill Gates' involvement in the WHO. This is because it is a deeply fascist form of corruption that is unfolding before our noses of all of us when a single person has so much power over the entire world's population. Fascism is precisely when the two factors, the political power and the economic power of industry, are mixed together to provide a power factor where it is the dictator, and in our case the government, who has the formal power. Even one of the foremost proponents of fascism, Italy's dictator Benito Mussolini, has stated that fascism could rightly be called 'corporatism'. In the case of Italy, it was primarily the trade unions and the opposition parties, who were forced to hand over all their power to the dictator Mussolini. On local-national plan here in Denmark, what the country has gone through since 2020 is precisely that corporatism has centred all power around the government.  When the citizen finds it more and more difficult to identify where the state begins and where it ends, then it indicates that fascism is ‘at it again’ to get a good hold of us after World War II and an eighty-year grace-period. Mette Frederiksen stated in her New Year's speech on 1st of January 2021: "Long live research and collaboration between public and private, long live science!”This is clearly in total support of a fascist state, but so subtly worded as to be almost oblivious to the average Dane celebrating New Year… It is also completely in line with the agreement that Denmark entered into with the WEF in 2018 – the “Frame Agreement” which obliges Denmark to expand its private/public partnership. (PPP)However, before I come back to the local Danish national level, let’s put a critial gaze upon just a few things; Corporatism, the WHO, the Pandemic and the involvement therein of a philanthropist called Bill Gates. Let us also ask the question: Who has the real power in the WHO? The top person in this organisation is the General Secretary and what do the stakeholders in the organisation expect from him? The stakeholders must be the 193/194 countries who are the members of the WHO and have outsourced parts of their health systems. They have handed the assessment of the whether or not there is a pandemic directly over to the WHO and together the decision as to how the agreement with the vaccine manufacturers activates. Here, enormous sums will change hands over a short period of time, because this is how the contracts with the pharmaceutical companies are written, most likely completely deliberately. It is unfortunately not the representatives of the countries who control the WHO in a democratic manner. Among the myriad of small and large sponsors, Bill Gates represents indisputably the largest share and therefore, by infererence, he controls the WHO. If one controls the WHO, like Bill Gates, and if you abuse this concentrated political power that one thereby has, then you also control the largest part of the world's population in the case of a declared pandemic. This is at least until the populations wise up and cancel the contract which the 193/194 countries have signed with the WHO. Denmark became a member of the United Nations (UN) at its foundation in 1945 and then automatically de facto became a member of the WHO in 1948 when this was founded as a part of the UN. In the case of a pandemic, we can now see that the WHO has enormous influence on what is going to happen in each individual country. We also saw this in Denmark, as not one single Danish authority recommended locking Denmark down following 11th of March 2020. So therefore, we must naturally surmise that the only internal Danish organisation with enough clout was the Monarchy which gave this recommendation. Indeed, this is unlikely but not entirely impossible -  except the Monarchy is not a health authority. After all, it is entirely clear and we know that neither the SSI (Medicine Institute of the State), the Health Authority or even the Medicinal Authority recommended the locking down of Denmark. So who did?On the other hand the WHO has, since March 2020, recommended tough lock-downs and aggressive testing strategies. This was also pointed out in an article in "Berlingske" (A Danish mainstream paper) from 24th of March 2020, which has this unequivocal headline: "WHO issues warnings now: Denmark will be locked down for months without changing to aggresive testing strategy". The WHO has not had any Danish sovereign power transferred

Readings from the book The Danish Illusion by Flemming BlicherWill Novo Nordisk be the next vaccine giant?The Danish Ministry of Health and the Danish Corona Corruption Let me hand you a prime example of political, possibly deeply corrupt, objectives trumping The professionalism of Danish experts and officials. This is clearly seen in the case where the Health Authority's director Søren Brostrøm is asked to put his professionalism aside, by Per Okkels who was the then Ministry of Health and the Elderly's head of department, which can also be referred to as the permanent secretary to the health minister. It was the danish tabloid newspaper Ekstra Bladet that, on the basis of a document review, was able to bring an article documenting that director Søren Brostrøm had already received an email on the 14th of March from his boss Per Okkels with apparently politically motivated instructions. The email had been written just three days after the WHO declared the corona ‘pandemic’. In this email, Okkels writes about Brostrøm's statements to the press that "before you answer, you must abandon the ‘principle of proportionality’ in recognition of an extreme precautionary principle". This email is the definitive proof that the government's, and thus the politicians', so-called ‘precautionary principle’ outweighs professionalism. Below is a translated extract of the article in Ekstra Bladet printed on the 28th of May 2020:Emails between the Director of the Danish Health Authority, Søren Brostrøm, and the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Health show a battle over testing strategy. Brostrøm was ordered to follow 'an extreme precautionary principle'Jakob Kjellberg, professor at the Danish Centre for Social Research and Analysis (Vive), also reads the head of department's email as an unequivocal message to Brostrøm. - Basically, he says 'test, test, test' and don't come running with all sorts of considerations about the fact that there must be a reasonable relationship between what we get out of testing and the resources that are spent on testing, says the professor, pointing out that the exchange of words exposes the disagreement between politicians and professionals. - It shows that there is a very different view of testing. It is a professional and political world that meets, he says.By asking Søren Brostrøm to drop his principles of proportions in the testing strategy and instead go for "an extreme precautionary principle," he is at the same time forced into the Prime Minister's line.It was exactly this “extreme precautionary principle” that the Prime Minister had communicated at the press meeting on the 11th of March.Put simply, the population is being (politically) misled by the ones paid to do a professional job governing the country. I believe that there is a high probability that this is a matter of subtle corruption on a political level, which is the basis for the permanent secretary’s strong political influence mail to its director. And what is the subtlety of corruption? Not even six months after this email exchange had occurred, we are informed that Per Okkels is ‘retiring’. To cap it all, we are also informed that a little later it emerges that he will stay ‘employed’ in a ‘part-time’ senior advisor position at the Novo Nordisk Foundation, a foundation that distributes more than five and a half billion danish kroner per year. In other words, a very wealthy fund, from an outfit who certainly don't need to account for every penny! A company who has enough funds to pay for full-time work for a new employee every week in the executive corridor, give him a soft and comfortable office chair as well as a mahogany table and an architect-designed desk-lamp. All in order to return a lucrative industry favour. Health Policy Journal writes on the 24th of February 2021 that Per Okkels had only ‘retired’ for a little over a month before he joined the Novo Nordisk Foundation. Another one of the Ministry of Health's key employees during the corona handling also switched to Novo Nordisk at roughly the same time. This was one Thomas Senderovitz, who was the Director of the Danish Medicines Agency who, after 5 years in this hallowed position, chooses to step down and jump ship to Novo Nordisk in the midst of the corona ‘pandemic’.Surprising? Well, I think so. Suspicious? Definitely! Novo Nordisk later announced that they intended to compete in the vaccine business. On the Novo Nordisk Foundation’s homepage they shared in December 2023 that the foundation would invest 1,8 billion danish kroner in the vaccine business. And that they would be doing so in collaboration with the big philanthropists Bill Gates and George Soros related companies Open Philantropy and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.Just shortly after the Danish Medicines’ Agency announced that the first COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ had received approval for emergency use in Denmark, it really puzzled me that Senderovitz chose to leave his former position, one of the most important (and well paid) central official positions, right in the middle of what was declared to be the most serious threat to human life in over a hundred years - the corona ‘pandemic’. If he was led by noble intentions, he would have used the opportunity to do whatever he could for his country. But he didn’t.On the 9th of March 2021, the Danish state broadcaster DR News brought us an article with the heading "Vaccine General Thomas Senderovitz stops in the middle of the rollout: 'It has not been an easy choice'”. What leadership material is this individual made of, when his love of his country (already deep in crisis) is demonstrated by abandoning the very job which is supposed to provide continuity and support to his fellow citizens? Perhaps because his love of country is - in reality - not really on his mind at all. Senderovitz is a descendant of a Jewish family that migrated to Denmark from the Ukraine in 1906 as a result of the Russian pogroms – the persecution of the Jews. Love of Denmark and the Danes? Well, I’ll leave you to come to your own conclusion over that one.Ukraine's president since 2019, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, is a Zionist-jew who, with a starting point in his Jewish-Ukrainian ancestry, just months after Russian troops rolled in over the border, spoke to one of Israel's largest dailies about Ukraine's Zionist future as a 'Greater Israel'. Victoria Nuland, the US Under Secretary of State has, since the Maidan revolution in Ukraine in 2014, managed the events in Ukraine with a firm American-Zionist hand. Nuland (originally Nudelmann) also comes from a family that in the last century was expelled during the same persecutions of Jews in the Ukraine, which sent Senderovitz's family fleeing. There is a greater Zionist influence on the war in Ukraine, which I will return to in the chapter “Year 2022 – The Bear is coming, the bear is coming”. In this chapter you will also learn about the Senderovitz family’s swift and extremely successful reaction to the conflict, and how they swiftly helped a great portion of the 90.000 Ukrainians to Denmark, which were part of the first wave of refugees escaping Ukraine.To get an impression of the golden revolving doors of politicians and civil servants, it is worth reading a danish blog by former long-serving civil servant Søren Skafte, who on 10 March 2021 wrote the post "When the head of the Danish Medicines’ Agency transfers to the pharmaceutical manufacturer". Søren Skafte's excellent blog entry raises a big question mark about the well-used golden revolving door between politics and the executive corridors of business. He also calls into question at the same time, although without saying so directly, whether Denmark is as free from corruption - which many Danes are proud of - and which the organisation ‘Transparency International’ provides expressed in their measurements of how Danish corruption is perceived by the outside world. Skafte also writes: The significant career changes which Thomas Senderovitz, Friis Arne Petersen, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, Brian Mikkelsens, Nick Hækkerup and others have made, should give rise to consider whether special requirements should be made for top politicians and officials who have been allowed to leave the public service bringing deep insight from Denmark's political engine room. Should there be, as exiits in a number of other countries, grace periods or "cooling off" periods instigated in these situations? It must be remembered that ‘non-compete’ or NDA clauses are not uncommon in the private business world. This is a legal framework which exists prceisely so that a high-ranking employee cannot take up employment with a competitor within a given period. However, and somewhat surpsingly, Danish Ministers and other top officials are not subject to this restriction, and the jump from ‘Slotsholmen’ – the Danish government’s ‘square mile’ - can be made from one day to the next. In Denmark, the debate about competence and waiting or cooling-off periods is so low-key that it barely exists at all. Surely this tells us that Danish inscrutibility is not as it is made out to be. Despite the lucrative changes in circumstances for several key employees in the Ministry of Health, it may still seem like a bit of a flighty accusation that Novo Nordisk, the Danish Health Authority and the Danish Medicines Agency were supposed to be involved in corruption about the corona pandemic. And how could Novo Nordisk be involved when it is just one insulin manufacturer and not part of the vaccine industry at all? There are no less than two very burdensome answers to the above question. One has to do with the ownership relationships surrounding the vaccine industry, and the resulting worldwide corruption. The second is much more sinister; Novo Nordisk turns out – surprise, surprise – to be heading into the vaccine business at hypersonic speed. The vaccine industry in Denmark has been dominated, and predominately underwritten - since the sale of t

Readings from the book The Danish Illusion by Flemming BlicherWhat about Health and Safety?At a hearing in the US Congress in 2020, telecoms industry representatives admitted that not a single dollar, euro, yen or Chinese renminbi was spent on security testing this technology even though billion after billion had been spent on the technology itself. Surely this simple fact alone should set the alarm bells ringing loudly and the consequent aborting of all 5G technological progress immediately. But this simply did not happen…. What did happen was that the lobbyists immediately sprang into action (funded by millions of dollars from the very same industry) obfuscating the truths and clouding the judgement of anyone who had the slightest suspicion and doubts as to the harmful effects of this technology and as to what was really going on. This is unfortunately exactly what happens when some new alarming information or a new scientific study comes to light: The alarming information is obfuscated and the danger to humans and nature is downplayed.This is especially dangerous when we are dealing with a product over which the average person has no control. 5G is precisely that product. 5G uses stronger and higher frequencies than earlier generation networks, which further makes this whole neglect of security an even greater crime. Yes, crime; because it is a crime to subject the ordinary population to this radiation without adequate safety testing. At a hearing in the United States of America, the Senate revealed in February 2019 that the industry had not carried out any scientific studies about safety and health in connection with the new 5G network. The fact that the industry has succeeded at all in continuing the 5G rollout unhindered, is largely due to an organization called ICNIRP, which is appointed, and thus legitimised by (guess who) the WHO. The WHO is once again given legitimacy by the United Nations (UN), to which the WHO is subject. ICNIRP is the international organisation under the WHO that draws up guidelines for saftey limits and thus regulations regarding electromagnetic radiation. This includes the radiation from such devices as mobile phones, smartphones, WiFi routers, mobile masts and not least seemingly innocent consumer electronics such as baby monitors. These devices all belong to the category which can be collectively called electromagnetic radiation exuding devices. The biggest problem with ICNIRP is that they only recognise thermal hazards of electromagnetic radiation and not the biological hazards. This means that their safety guidelines, in which they indicate some limit values, only take into account that the human body must not stay heated locally more than one degree Celsius by the radiation that is emitted from a device. The ICNIRP guidelines thus ignore the dangers of your body receiving biological damage from the radiation to which the body is exposed. Indeed, it is precisely this biological damage that many scientific studies demonstrate when human tissue is exposed to electromagnetic radiation, even at levels a thousand times below the existing limit values in the ICNIRP guidelines. The knowledge I accumulated at that time about the ICNIRP guidelines, I converted at the beginning of 2020 into a number of videos in English that I posted on YouTube. I have spent a lot of time and energy researching ICNIRP and WHO and how they have acted over the years. My own research in the field does not leave me in any doubt that the people who sit in central positions in these organisations also well know about the science in this field and therefore know that electromagnetic radiation from mobile networks is much more dangerous than the organisations express. Of course, it is all down to money and the money involved in the rollout of 5G makes it impossible for any of the individuals to be honest about that and at the same time keep their jobs and careers. In other words, this is corruption at a very high level. Furthermore, because lobbyism is as massive as it is, it is difficult to have a reasonable debate on the subject without immediately being called a tin-foil hat-wearing conspiracy theorist. It was something I had to experience myself when I started participating in the debate about 5G in the trade magazine Ingeniøren's online forum. People I had never met called me all sorts of things instead of engaging in a meaningful debate on the subject. The fact is that the corrupt organisations have all the resources and know how to use them. That is why the researchers and independent private individuals, such as myself, who delve into the matter and read up on the science in the field, have very few opportunities to educate the rest of the population about what the publicised science really shows. The misinformation and the deceptions carefully prepared by the (paid) lobbyists are always what one comes across first, if you want to do your own research and get to the nub of the matter.For example, the aforementioned ICNIRP appears as an ‘authority’ in the field of radiation, and even if you read up on their website, few people would care to investigate what industry background the ICNIRP employees have. They are all, in one way or another, paid by the industry and are in no way independent when evaluating a new scientific study e.g. about the dangers of electromagnetic radiation from the new 5G frequencies. And the scientific researchers who might just possibly produce a new radiation-critical scientific study, risk having their careers smashed by this semi-official lobbyist organisation ICNIRP, which wields far too much power. Corruption is rife, but extremely subtle, and those who are behind it, i.e. those who make money from it, namely the industry players, know fully well that they have to hide the money channels that go to those implicated organisations and the prepaid ‘researchers’ involved.Many ordinary people do not realise that the telecoms industry is part of a larger industrial area referred to as the Military Industrial Complex. Since there is so much money involved in the combined telecommunications industry and military industry, those who oppose the industry lobbyists are very tightly censored. The pattern of lobbying that I quickly identified during my investigations of 5G and the radiation area, would later prove to be repeated in other industries. Now it wasn't the case that I was the first sceptic in Denmark to start to inform people about the negative consequences of mobile phone radiation. On the contrary, there have been many who have informed on the subject, many of whom are still active, and from whom I have gained a great deal of inspiration. However, no one has done a more thorough job of informing about these problems than Eva Theilgaard Jacobsen who, in 2017 published the book, “Mørkelægning af mobilstrålingens konsekvenser” – “Concealing the consequences of mobile radiation”. If you are interested in knowing more about mobile radiations’ negative consequences, then this book is worth its weight in gold. It presents structured argument after argument for us as a society to stop the increasing electrosmog to which we are exposed and the book also goes into how the harmful effects appear. Futhermore, you can read how the telecommunications industry does everything it possibly can to sidetrack the authorities. It is called lobbying. It is my impression that corruption exists in all major industries, and the more money the industry controls, the better the ‘quality’ of corruption exists. Let’s not kid ourselves; Lobbying is just a fancy word for corruption. It applies both for the mobile industry in which I myself have made a (now defunct) career, as well as for virtually every other industry. For instance the pharmaceutical industry is just a few steps short of the aforementioned Military Industrial Complex when it comes to making money by corrupting politicians and industries. This was also the case when the WHO declared the corona outbreak on 11 March 2020 as a pandemic. All the countries that have agreements with the vaccine manufacturers have committed themselves to purchase a certain amount of vaccines, and the vaccine manufacturers are guaranteed a huge income, exactly as was the case during the 2009 H1N1 “Swine flu” pandemic. My question back in 2020 was how Danish experts from the Danish Health Authority, Statens Serum Institut and the Ministry of Health could be so blind to this corruption within the WHO’s own ranks? And what about the politicians who we are told are expressly elected so as to avoid corruption within the civil service and to oversee in the exercise of these authorities' functions? Perhaps it was because in 2020 these experts and politicians were already influenced and prepared to be part of the corruption that I believe the corona pandemic unleashed. They were involved at all levels, from politicians to the civil service and to the other authorities’ execution of their work. I believe that this is corruption on a grand scale that is constantly escalating in step with the fact that the populations of the world's countries do not have a proper say. Links for this podcast episode:* Environmental Health Trust lavede i februar 2019 en artikel om sikkerheden og sundheden ved 5G: https://ehtrust.org/health-effects-of-5g-wireless-technology-confirmed-at-us-senate-hearing-after-senator-blumenthal-questions-industry/* ICNIRPs hjemmeside: https://www.icnirp.org* Eva Theilgaard Jacobsens bog “Mørkelægning af mobilstrålingens konsekvenser” omtales af May-Day: https://www.mayday-info.dk/ny-bog-moerklaegning-af-mobilstraalingens-konsekvenser* Artikel i dagbladet Information fra 2009 om korruptionen under erklæringen af H1N1 for pandemi: https://www.information.dk/udland/2009/11/staerk-lobbyisme-bag-who-beslutning-massevaccination* Politiken artikel fra juni 2010 som omtaler den udbredte korruption i WHO ifm. H1N1 skandalen: https://politiken.dk/debat/signatur