Discover
FE-1 Made Simple

FE-1 Made Simple
Author: Akintunde Idowu
Subscribed: 1Played: 75Subscribe
Share
© Akintunde Idowu
Description
FE-1 Made Simple is a podcast for anyone prepping for the Law Society of Ireland’s FE-1 exams. It is your audio-first study buddy. We turn tricky topics into clear, digestible episodes you can listen to on the go — perfect for study walks, commutes, or last-minute revision.
76 Episodes
Reverse
Court: King’s Bench
Citation: [1915] 1 KB 1
Facts
In Hurst v. Picture Theatres Ltd, Mr. Hurst purchased a ticket to watch a film at a cinema owned by Picture Theatres Ltd. Partway through the film, an employee of the theatre accused Mr. Hurst of entering without a valid ticket, even though he had paid for one, and subsequently ejected him from the premises. Mr. Hurst sued for trespass to the person (for being forcibly removed) and breach of contract (for the premature revocation of his license to be on the property).
Legal Issues
Revocation of License: Whether the cinema, having sold Mr. Hurst a ticket, had the right to revoke his license to remain on the premises without just cause.
Trespass to Person: Whether forcibly ejecting Mr. Hurst from the cinema amounted to trespass to the person if he had a valid license to be there.
Legal Principles Applied
License Coupled with Contract: In cases where a person has purchased a ticket, they acquire a license coupled with a contract. This allows the individual to occupy the premises for the specified purpose (in this case, watching the film), and the license cannot be arbitrarily revoked by the licensor during the contract’s duration unless there is a legitimate reason, such as breach of conditions or disorderly conduct.
Right to Enjoy the Service Contracted: Under contract law, Mr. Hurst had the right to remain on the premises as long as he adhered to the terms, which included holding a valid ticket and behaving appropriately.
Decision
The court found in favor of Mr. Hurst, ruling that he was lawfully on the premises under a valid license provided by his purchase of the ticket. The revocation of his license was unjustified, and the cinema had wrongfully ejected him.
Unjustified Revocation of License: The court held that, by purchasing the ticket, Mr. Hurst had obtained a contractual right to be on the premises and view the film. Since there was no breach of contract or misconduct on Mr. Hurst’s part, the theatre could not arbitrarily revoke his license to be there.
Trespass to the Person: The court ruled that forcibly ejecting Mr. Hurst without justification constituted trespass to the person, entitling him to damages.
Key Points from the Judgment
Protection for Ticket Holders: The judgment reinforced that a ticket represents not just a revocable license, but a license with contractual rights, which cannot be withdrawn without proper cause.
Legal Distinction Between Mere Licenses and Licenses Coupled with Contracts: The case distinguished between general licenses (which can often be revoked at will) and licenses that arise from contracts (which grant the licensee additional protections as long as they adhere to the contract terms).
Significance
Hurst v. Picture Theatres Ltd set an important precedent regarding the treatment of licenses coupled with contracts. It established that a license granted through a paid contract (like a cinema ticket) cannot be revoked without just cause, providing consumers with security in their contractual rights to enjoy purchased services. This principle has been applied in similar cases where individuals are removed from premises despite fulfilling all contractual conditions, thereby protecting consumers against arbitrary actions by service providers.
If you're aiming to become a solicitor in Ireland, the FE-1 exam is a crucial milestone on your path. This episode breaks down everything you need to know about the FE-1, the entrance exam set by the Law Society of Ireland, and how to tackle it effectively. We’ll cover the structure of the exam, the subjects you’ll be tested on (including EU Law, Property Law, Constitutional Law, and more), and provide tips for planning your study schedule.
We’ll also delve into the skills required to succeed, such as mastering legal reasoning, writing concise arguments, and managing your time effectively under exam conditions. Additionally, we’ll explore practical tips on using resources like past exam papers, study guides, and key textbooks, and discuss how to prioritize topics for each subject. By the end of this episode, you’ll have a clear roadmap for preparing for the FE-1 exam and insight into what it takes to pass and progress towards a career as a solicitor in Ireland.
In this episode, we explore the different types of company liquidation in Irish law, including court-ordered, voluntary, and creditors’ liquidations. We’ll explain the role of the liquidator, the distribution of assets, and the order of priority for creditors. We’ll also discuss the legal grounds for court-ordered liquidation, including insolvency and just and equitable grounds. Join us to understand the process of winding up a company and resolving its debts.
In this episode, we delve into the complexities of constitutional rights in Ireland, focusing on unenumerated rights and their judicial recognition. We’ll discuss how courts balance conflicting rights and apply the doctrine of proportionality to limit constitutional rights. We’ll also explore how the Constitution applies to non-citizens and examine the waiver of rights in contexts such as adoption and medical treatment. This episode offers a comprehensive guide to the interpretation and protection of constitutional rights.
In this episode, we explore the doctrine of illegality in contract law, examining both common law and statutory illegality. We’ll discuss categories of illegal contracts, such as those involving crime, tort, immorality, or prejudice to justice, and illustrate these principles through case studies. We’ll also dive into statutory illegality and its impact on contract enforceability, with a focus on the key case of IBRC v Quinn [2015] IESC. Finally, we’ll explore the effects of illegality, including when contracts may still be enforceable through exceptions like repentance, severance, and independent causes of action. Join us for an insightful look at how the law deals with illegal agreements!
In this episode, we examine the legal framework surrounding the appointment, removal, and retirement of trustees in Ireland, focusing on the outdated Trustee Act 1893 and the need for reform. We’ll explore statutory provisions, court jurisdiction, and the welfare of beneficiaries as guiding principles in trustee management. We’ll also delve into case law such as Arnott v Arnott, illustrating the complexities of trustee conflicts of interest. Tune in for a comprehensive discussion on trustee management.
In this episode, we explore accomplice liability, where individuals can be held responsible for assisting in the commission of a crime. We’ll outline how accomplices can aid, abet, counsel, or procure a crime, and the mens rea required for each. We’ll also cover the implications of the principal offender being acquitted and discuss the Criminal Law Act 1997, which modernised this area. Tune in for a thorough understanding of how accomplice liability works in Irish law!
In this episode, we explore the concept of EU citizenship, focusing on its legal framework and the key rights it grants individuals within the European Union. We’ll examine the evolution of EU citizenship, highlighting its shift from an economic focus to a fundamental right. Through the Citizens’ Rights Directive, we’ll discuss the rights to move, reside, and seek equal treatment across Member States, including residence conditions and social assistance entitlements. We’ll also touch on the political rights EU citizens enjoy, such as voting in European Parliament elections and the right to petition. This episode offers a comprehensive look at the freedoms and protections that come with EU citizenship!
In this episode, we explore the legal principles that determine ownership when objects are found on land—a key topic for the FE1 exam. We’ll examine the distinction between objects found on the surface, where the finder often has a stronger claim, and those found beneath the ground, which generally belong to the landowner. Cases like Parker v British Airways Board and Elwes v Brigg Gas Company will illustrate these principles. We’ll also cover the concept of treasure trove, where valuable buried items with no known owner belong to the State, as seen in Webb v Ireland. Join us for a comprehensive look at how location and ownership impact the rights of finders and landowners!
In this episode, we explore the various types of damages awarded in Irish tort law, focusing on compensating plaintiffs for harm suffered. We’ll delve into the five main categories of damages: compensatory, aggravated, nominal, punitive/exemplary, and contemptuous. A large part of the episode will be dedicated to compensatory damages, including general damages (pain and suffering, loss of life expectancy) and special damages (medical expenses, loss of earnings), discussing how courts quantify these awards. We’ll also explore the implications of the Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004 and address concerns about "compo culture." Tune in for a comprehensive overview of how damages are calculated and awarded in tort law!
In this episode, we examine the key defences available in tort actions, focusing on contributory negligence, failure to mitigate damages, voluntary assumption of risk, consent, necessity, inevitable accident, illegality, and legal authority. We’ll discuss the burden of proof for these defences, distinguishing between complete and partial defences, and provide case law examples to illustrate their application. Tune in for an in-depth analysis of these defences, exploring relevant legislation and historical developments that shape tort law in Ireland. This episode is essential for understanding how defendants can navigate legal disputes in tort cases!
In this episode, we explore the complexities of the Statute of Limitations in Irish tort law. We’ll discuss the statutory framework and how the principle of "discoverability" triggers the limitation period for various tort actions, such as personal injuries, property damage, and financial loss. We’ll also cover factors like "undue delay" and "disability" that can extend or impact these periods. Additionally, we’ll examine the rules for fatal injuries and the survival of actions after death. Tune in for a comprehensive guide to navigating limitation periods in tort law, balancing the right to seek justice with legal efficiency!
In this episode, we explore the legal principles surrounding concurrent wrongdoers under the Civil Liability Act 1961 in Ireland. We’ll examine the key concepts, including the plaintiff’s right to full compensation, the right of concurrent wrongdoers to fair contributions, and the importance of litigating all relevant matters in a single action. We’ll define "concurrent wrongdoers" and discuss scenarios involving vicarious liability, breaches of joint duty, and independent actions causing the same damage. Using key cases like Hussey v Dillon and Moloney v Liddy, we’ll explore issues of causation, joint liability, and the apportionment of blame. Tune in for a detailed analysis of this complex area of Irish tort law!
In this episode, we examine the legal framework governing liability for fires in Ireland, focusing on the shift from strict liability to the more nuanced approach under the Accidental Fires Act 1943. We’ll discuss how occupiers are generally exempt from liability for accidental fires, unless caused by negligence or intentional actions. Key cases like Woods v O’Connor and Feeney v Andreucetti illustrate how courts interpret "accidentally" and distinguish it from negligence. We’ll also explore negligence in failing to control or extinguish fires, and the impact of the Fire Services Act 1981 on public safety. Tune in for a comprehensive guide to fire liability under Irish law!
In this episode, we explore the legal principles governing liability for injuries caused by animals in Irish tort law. We’ll examine general negligence rules and specific torts like trespass and nuisance, with a focus on the importance of foreseeability and an owner’s knowledge of the animal’s dangerousness. We’ll also discuss the application of strict liability under the Rylands v Fletcher rule and the use of res ipsa loquitur in cattle trespass cases. Additionally, we’ll dive into common law rules like "scienter" and statutory provisions, including the Animals Act 1985 and the Control of Dogs Acts 1986 and 1992. Tune in to understand the legal responsibilities of animal owners in Ireland!
In this episode, we explore the tort of passing off, a legal tool designed to protect businesses from unfair competition by preventing others from misleading consumers about the origin of goods or services. We’ll break down the three essential elements to establish a claim: the existence of goodwill or reputation, misrepresentation causing consumer confusion, and damage to the business. We’ll discuss key cases from Ireland and England, examining how goodwill is protected, the types of misrepresentation that can arise, and the damages that can be claimed. Lastly, we’ll explain how interlocutory injunctions can be used to halt passing off activities before a full trial. Tune in for a detailed guide to this crucial area of commercial law!
In this episode, we explore the historic Rule in Rylands v Fletcher, which imposes strict liability on defendants for damage caused by something they bring onto their land that escapes and causes harm. We’ll break down the key elements, including the requirement for "non-natural use" of land, an "escape," and foreseeable damage. We’ll also analyze how cases like Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather and Transco Plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council have narrowed the rule’s application. Finally, we’ll discuss the ongoing debate about the rule’s future, whether it should be reformed or integrated into negligence law. Tune in to understand this foundational tort principle!
In this episode, we examine the tort of nuisance in Irish law, focusing on the distinction between private and public nuisance. We’ll define nuisance as an unreasonable interference with the enjoyment of land and discuss the factors that determine the reasonableness of the interference. We’ll also cover the elements required to establish a claim, who can bring a claim, and who can be sued for nuisance. Finally, we’ll explore remedies like injunctions, damages, and abatement, while analyzing key case law to illustrate these principles. Tune in for a comprehensive overview of nuisance and its legal implications!
In this episode, we explore the tort of trespass to land, covering its historical roots and key legal principles. We’ll explain the requirement for direct, intentional, or negligent interference with property and discuss the concept of "actionable per se," where a trespass is actionable without proof of actual damage. We’ll also dive into constitutional implications, the definition of "land," and defences such as consent, lawful justification, and necessity. Lastly, we’ll explore remedies like injunctions and damages. Join us for a thorough understanding of trespass to land and its relevance in Irish law!
In this episode, we explore the legal framework governing liability for defective products in Ireland, focusing on common law negligence, contract law, and the Liability for Defective Products Act 1991. We’ll trace the evolution of product liability from Winterbottom v Wright to the landmark case Donoghue v Stevenson, which introduced the neighbour principle and expanded liability to manufacturers. We’ll also discuss the strict liability regime under the 1991 Act, examining key concepts like "defective product," "producer," and "causation," along with the consumer expectation test and available defences. Tune in for a comprehensive look at how Irish law handles product liability!