Claim Ownership
Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles
Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup ChroniclesSubscribed: 21Played: 1,720
Subscribe
© Bobby Capucci
Description
Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles is a podcast dedicated to examining not just who Epstein was and what he did, but how so many people and institutions worked—then and now—to keep it all hidden. This series cuts past the headlines and digs into the documentation: court filings, deposition transcripts, plea deals, sealed exhibits, and the bureaucratic paper trail that still tells the real story. Our focus isn’t on speculation or recycled outrage. It’s on facts—and the deliberate efforts to keep those facts out of public view.
Each episode will feature in-depth analysis of newly surfaced records and underreported legal developments, alongside expert commentary that connects them to the broader machinery of power that shielded Epstein for decades. We’ll revisit the timeline from his first arrests through his 2008 plea deal, and into the re-investigations that followed his 2019 death in federal custody. And we won’t stop there—we’ll look closely at the current state of affairs: the closed probes, the lingering co-conspirators, the civil suits, and the glaring gaps in accountability.
What makes The Coverup Chronicles different is that we’re not here to sensationalize the story—we’re here to document the ongoing concealment of it. This isn’t just about reliving Epstein’s crimes. It’s about following the networks that enabled them, protected him, and continue to obscure the truth. If you want an honest look at what’s still being hidden—by whom, and why—this is the podcast that pulls those threads.
And I should know—I’ve spent over six years uncovering every dark corner of this case. My name is Bobby Capucci, and I’ve dedicated those same six years exposing the truth about Epstein and the powerful figures who enabled him. From on-the-ground investigations at Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, where I spoke with insiders, to national appearances on Tucker Carlson, I’ve followed this story farther than most are willing to go.
Who helped Epstein build his empire? Who protected him? And who is still pulling the strings? The answers lie in the shadows of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal empire. .
This is the truth they don’t want you to hear. And I’m here to make sure you do.
Each episode will feature in-depth analysis of newly surfaced records and underreported legal developments, alongside expert commentary that connects them to the broader machinery of power that shielded Epstein for decades. We’ll revisit the timeline from his first arrests through his 2008 plea deal, and into the re-investigations that followed his 2019 death in federal custody. And we won’t stop there—we’ll look closely at the current state of affairs: the closed probes, the lingering co-conspirators, the civil suits, and the glaring gaps in accountability.
What makes The Coverup Chronicles different is that we’re not here to sensationalize the story—we’re here to document the ongoing concealment of it. This isn’t just about reliving Epstein’s crimes. It’s about following the networks that enabled them, protected him, and continue to obscure the truth. If you want an honest look at what’s still being hidden—by whom, and why—this is the podcast that pulls those threads.
And I should know—I’ve spent over six years uncovering every dark corner of this case. My name is Bobby Capucci, and I’ve dedicated those same six years exposing the truth about Epstein and the powerful figures who enabled him. From on-the-ground investigations at Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, where I spoke with insiders, to national appearances on Tucker Carlson, I’ve followed this story farther than most are willing to go.
Who helped Epstein build his empire? Who protected him? And who is still pulling the strings? The answers lie in the shadows of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal empire. .
This is the truth they don’t want you to hear. And I’m here to make sure you do.
1014 Episodes
Reverse
Jeffrey Epstein claimed he was being stalked by a strange figure he described as a “mafia ninja,” allegedly tied to the Gambino crime family. According to reports, this person dressed in black and appeared near Epstein’s homes, moving stealthily in a way that unnerved him. Epstein supposedly told others about the sightings, framing it as organized crime intimidation rather than random harassment, and presenting the “ninja” as part of a network of threats aimed at keeping him in line.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.the-sun.com/news/351095/jeffrey-epstein-mafia-mob-ninja-gambino/
Alan Dershowitz made an appearance on News Nation this week where he attempted to defend the associates of Jeffrey Epstein who were about to be unmasked using the same old excuse that...nobody knew. Nobody had a CLUE who or what Jeffrey Epstein was. In this episode we take a look at what Dershowitz had to say in the interview about Jeffrey Epstein and the newly unsealed names and what we might expect as things continue to move forward. (commercial at 7:55)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Alan Dershowitz: Don't Blame Men on Jeffrey Epstein’s List (mediaite.com)
Ghislaine Maxwell is the youngest child of the late media mogul Robert Maxwell, and she has several sisters who have kept lower profiles compared to her own notoriety. Among them are Isabel and Christine Maxwell, who were once prominent figures in the tech and business world. Christine co-founded the search engine Magellan in the 1990s and has worked in education and technology, while Isabel has also been active in digital enterprises and philanthropy. Both women have largely tried to distance themselves from the criminal scandals surrounding their sister Ghislaine, although their family name inevitably drags them into the broader narrative of the Maxwell legacy.Another Maxwell sister, Anne Maxwell, pursued a career in academia and publishing, living a more private life compared to Christine and Isabel. The sisters grew up in the shadow of their father’s controversial empire and the scandal following his death in 1991, when Robert Maxwell drowned under mysterious circumstances after being accused of looting company pension funds. The Maxwell daughters, especially Christine and Isabel, attempted to rebuild the family’s reputation through their professional careers, but Ghislaine’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein and subsequent conviction further tainted the already troubled Maxwell name.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Groomed for prominence by birth, Prince Andrew long enjoyed the privileges of closeness to the throne—but following the Epstein scandal and a disastrous BBC interview in 2019, he has increasingly been “iced out” by the rest of the royal family. His public role was dramatically curtailed: he stepped back from official duties, lost many patronages and military titles, and now rarely appears at major royal events. In practice, the palace has treated him more like a liability than a royal asset, often freezing him out of the inner circle in order to protect the monarchy’s image.This distancing sends a powerful message: Andrew’s missteps are deemed too severe for the monarchy to absorb quietly. His marginalization underscores both the internal fractures of the Windsor family and the intensifying scrutiny that now governs royal behavior. The optics of being excluded—ignored by King Charles, side-glanced by Prince William, left at the periphery of high-profile ceremonies—amplify the perception that he is now persona non grata. For an institution built on continuity, duty, and unity, freezing out one of its own exposes the fragility underneath the veneer of royal solidarity.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Bill Gates was on the Anderson Cooper show to discuss his divorce and his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. As the questions continue to swirl about how deep his relationship with Epstein truly was, the more Bill Gates attempts to distance himself from answering those questions.To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9863047/Bill-Gates-admits-spending-time-Jeffrey-Epstein-huge-mistake.html
According to sources Ghislaine Maxwell was melancholy when first arriving at the Prison in Florida but now, after having time to settle in, she is also participating in activities such as interdormitory competitions such as checkers. She has also found a group of friends to pal around with. Let's take a look! to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11412785/Ghislaine-Maxwell-seen-walking-galpal-cushy-regimen-Florida-prison-revealed.html#comments
Bill Barr’s deposition before Congress on Jeffrey Epstein was a masterclass in calculated deflection. While Barr insisted that Epstein’s death was “absolutely” suicide, he conceded that the prison surveillance system had “blind spots”—a detail that conveniently leaves just enough room for speculation without providing definitive answers. His reliance on flawed or incomplete camera footage, combined with his dismissal of alternative forensic perspectives, came off less like transparency and more like institutional damage control. Instead of holding the Bureau of Prisons accountable, Barr’s narrative positioned the failures as unfortunate but inconsequential, a stance that fails to satisfy the public demand for clarity.Just as troubling was Barr’s evasiveness when pressed about Donald Trump’s knowledge of Epstein. He admitted to having spoken with Trump about Epstein’s death but couldn’t recall when one of those conversations occurred—an astonishing lapse considering the gravity of the matter. His reasoning that “if there were more to it, it would have leaked” was not only flippant but dismissive of the very real history of suppression, obstruction, and selective disclosure that has defined the Epstein saga. By leaning on institutional trust in a case defined by betrayal of that very trust, Barr’s testimony did little more than reinforce suspicions that the Department of Justice has long been more concerned with containment than accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Barr-Transcript.pdf
Bill Barr’s deposition before Congress on Jeffrey Epstein was a masterclass in calculated deflection. While Barr insisted that Epstein’s death was “absolutely” suicide, he conceded that the prison surveillance system had “blind spots”—a detail that conveniently leaves just enough room for speculation without providing definitive answers. His reliance on flawed or incomplete camera footage, combined with his dismissal of alternative forensic perspectives, came off less like transparency and more like institutional damage control. Instead of holding the Bureau of Prisons accountable, Barr’s narrative positioned the failures as unfortunate but inconsequential, a stance that fails to satisfy the public demand for clarity.Just as troubling was Barr’s evasiveness when pressed about Donald Trump’s knowledge of Epstein. He admitted to having spoken with Trump about Epstein’s death but couldn’t recall when one of those conversations occurred—an astonishing lapse considering the gravity of the matter. His reasoning that “if there were more to it, it would have leaked” was not only flippant but dismissive of the very real history of suppression, obstruction, and selective disclosure that has defined the Epstein saga. By leaning on institutional trust in a case defined by betrayal of that very trust, Barr’s testimony did little more than reinforce suspicions that the Department of Justice has long been more concerned with containment than accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Barr-Transcript.pdf
The Thomas Massie/Ro Khana discharge petition to bring Jeffrey Epstein’s sealed files to the House floor has surged forward, closing in on the 218 votes required. With all 212 Democrats unified in support, the math is simple: just a handful of Republicans breaking ranks will guarantee the petition’s success. The momentum has been further fueled by the Arizona special election, where the victor pledged to add their name as soon as they’re sworn in, potentially becoming the tipping point.Republican leadership, however, is digging in its heels. Reports have surfaced of threats and pressure campaigns aimed at peeling away GOP support, a reflection of the desperation to keep the vote from hitting the magic number. But if Massie secures the final signatures, leadership will lose control, and the House will be compelled to go on record in full public view. At that moment, lawmakers will have to choose between protecting secrets or siding with transparency—an unavoidable reckoning that could fracture party lines and ignite a political firestorm.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:House nears vote to compel release of Jeffrey Epstein files
This morning’s Epstein-related headlines captured a mix of political, legal, and royal fallout. In Washington, a provocative bronze statue of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein holding hands was installed overnight on the National Mall and swiftly removed by U.S. Park Police for lacking proper authorization. The work, titled “Best Friends Forever,” was claimed by an anonymous art collective as political satire, provoking crowds and online debate before authorities dismantled it. The episode highlighted ongoing tensions around Trump’s past ties to Epstein and the broader fight over transparency in the case.At the same time, James O’Keefe released hidden-camera footage of former DOJ official Glenn Prager alleging that Trump is blocking the release of Epstein-related files, even claiming Epstein had been a CIA asset—remarks that DOJ dismissed as misleading. Meanwhile, Princess Eugenie launched an anti-trafficking campaign in New York to address exploitation in counterfeit fashion supply chains. Her initiative, though welcomed by some human rights groups, was quickly overshadowed by renewed scrutiny of her parents’ ties to Epstein, underscoring how the scandal continues to reverberate across politics and royalty alike.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
James O’Keefe (via his O’Keefe Media / Project Veritas apparatus) recently released a covert recording of Glenn Prager, a former DOJ official, during a flight from Phoenix to Washington. In the video, Prager asserts that Epstein was a CIA asset, alleges that President Trump is not personally implicated in Epstein-related sexual crimes, and claims Trump’s reluctance to release files stems from a desire to “protect a lot of people.” He further argues that his interviews with Epstein victims and review of itineraries found no evidence of Trump being present during assaults, while drawing a sharp contrast to Bill Clinton, whom he said was present during alleged rapes.The Department of Justice swiftly pushed back, stating that Prager’s role was limited to a program analyst position more than fifteen years ago and that he lacks direct knowledge of the Epstein investigations. The DOJ called his statements unreliable and criticized the release as exploitative of sexual abuse victims. Meanwhile, the recording has ignited renewed calls among critics and some Republicans for more transparency in the Epstein case and fresh scrutiny of withheld DOJ files.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein Investigator Taped Admitting Donald Trump ‘Covered Up’ Files
In recent years, pressure has grown in France to strengthen legal protections for minors, in part spurred by high-profile cases connected to Jeffrey Epstein and Jean-Luc Brunel, who was accused of supplying underage girls for sexual exploitation and rape. Brunel was ultimately charged in France with raping minors over the age of 15, which highlights the ambiguity under older French laws around what sexual relationships with adolescents are automatically illegal versus what requires proof of violence, coercion, or abuse of authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York, was named in High Court documents over large payments linked to Turkish businessman Selman Turk, who is accused of fraud. Records show that Ferguson received £225,000 from a company connected to Turk, while Prince Andrew was sent £750,000, allegedly as part of a wider scheme involving a Turkish woman’s assets. Andrew has since repaid the money, but the case drew scrutiny because the funds were described in varying ways—as a wedding gift to Princess Beatrice, a fee for Ferguson’s ambassador work, or other purposes—raising questions about transparency and judgment.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Prince Andrew has become a perpetual liability for the British monarchy, with his scandals continuing to overshadow the institution’s attempts at modernization and public service. His long association with Jeffrey Epstein and subsequent settlement with Virginia Giuffre, while never an admission of guilt, has cemented him in the public mind as a man of disgrace who cannot be trusted. Every time his name resurfaces, it drags the monarchy back into a mire of sleaze and scandal, reminding the world of his recklessness and arrogance. His inability to account honestly for his relationships and behavior, paired with his disastrous BBC “Newsnight” interview, exposed not only his own lack of judgment but also the monarchy’s tone-deafness in handling crises.Even after being stripped of official duties, Andrew remains a thorn in the side of the royal family, his mere presence at events sparking public outrage and critical headlines. His clinging to privilege, combined with his refusal to step aside completely, undermines the monarchy’s carefully managed image of dignity and service. Instead of fading into obscurity, his scandals linger as a living reminder of hypocrisy at the heart of the institution—a prince who used his position recklessly and now stains the legacy of the monarchy with every reemergence. His behavior continues to erode the trust and respect the monarchy depends on for survival in the modern era.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Jean-Luc Brunel, a French modeling agent and long-time associate of Jeffrey Epstein, was under growing French criminal investigations since around 2019 for alleged sexual exploitation, rape, trafficking of minors, and supplying underage girls to Epstein. Brunel founded agencies such as Karin Models and MC2 Model Management (with Epstein’s financial backing) and has been accused by former models of years of abuse: drugging, sexual assault, and exploiting young women who were often from vulnerable backgrounds. French prosecutors officially charged him in December 2020 with rape of minors (over 15) and sexual harassment, among other offenses, and investigators were probing his role in a wider network of abuse connected to Epstein.However, Brunel’s case never reached a full trial. In February 2022, he was found dead in his cell at La Santé Prison in Paris, reportedly by suicide, while in pre-trial detention. His death came after multiple suicide attempts. The result: many of his alleged victims were denied the opportunity for legal closure in court. His passing both ended the criminal proceedings against him and left significant questions unanswered about the fullness of his culpability, the extent of networked complicity, and how much evidence was gathered and might still yet emerge.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Darren Indyke, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime lawyer and co-executor of his estate, has been accused in multiple lawsuits of helping Epstein structure finances to conceal illicit activities. Court filings and investigations allege that Indyke set up shell companies, bank accounts, and trusts used to disguise payments to victims, recruiters, and others tied to Epstein’s trafficking operation. The Virgin Islands government specifically claimed Indyke facilitated large transfers to women with foreign surnames, covered immigration and housing expenses, and even arranged sham marriages to help secure legal status for young women connected to Epstein. Judges have allowed portions of these lawsuits to proceed, signaling that some allegations of aiding in structuring and concealment have sufficient merit to be heard in court.Indyke has consistently denied wrongdoing, stating through attorneys that he had no knowledge of or involvement in Epstein’s sexual crimes. He has not faced criminal charges, though he remains under legal scrutiny in civil actions brought by victims and government entities. His defense has relied on challenging the sufficiency of claims and arguing lack of intent or knowledge, leading to the dismissal of some allegations while others continue to advance. Despite his denials, Indyke’s decades-long role as Epstein’s closest legal adviser and executor of his estate has kept him central to accusations that Epstein’s inner circle knowingly enabled the financier’s criminal empire.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
John Bryan, who served as one of Prince Andrew’s crisis managers, contends that Andrew is innocent of wrongdoing in relation to the Jeffrey Epstein allegations. Bryan has repeatedly claimed that Andrew was manipulated by Epstein, not complicit in illegal acts. He has suggested that Epstein’s relationship with the Prince was part of a larger extortion scheme, designed to exploit Andrew or even the royal family for financial gain. Bryan says that many of the claims against Andrew are unsubstantiated, and that he saw Andrew as a “wonderful man” who is unlike the negative, sensational media portrayal.Bryan has also publicly expressed regret for some of his own statements. In a recorded interaction, he appeared to say Andrew “lied” about having sex with underage girls tied to Epstein, but later on shows like Piers Morgan Uncensored Bryan retracted those words, saying they did not reflect his beliefs, research, or what he knows. He attributed his remarks in that sting to a combination of being influenced by the undercover setting, alcohol, and the desire to please the interviewer, rather than factual knowledge. Bryan maintains that Andrew never admitted wrongdoing to him, and stresses he has never found credible evidence that Andrew engaged in sexual activity with minors.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Bill Barr’s deposition before Congress on Jeffrey Epstein was a masterclass in calculated deflection. While Barr insisted that Epstein’s death was “absolutely” suicide, he conceded that the prison surveillance system had “blind spots”—a detail that conveniently leaves just enough room for speculation without providing definitive answers. His reliance on flawed or incomplete camera footage, combined with his dismissal of alternative forensic perspectives, came off less like transparency and more like institutional damage control. Instead of holding the Bureau of Prisons accountable, Barr’s narrative positioned the failures as unfortunate but inconsequential, a stance that fails to satisfy the public demand for clarity.Just as troubling was Barr’s evasiveness when pressed about Donald Trump’s knowledge of Epstein. He admitted to having spoken with Trump about Epstein’s death but couldn’t recall when one of those conversations occurred—an astonishing lapse considering the gravity of the matter. His reasoning that “if there were more to it, it would have leaked” was not only flippant but dismissive of the very real history of suppression, obstruction, and selective disclosure that has defined the Epstein saga. By leaning on institutional trust in a case defined by betrayal of that very trust, Barr’s testimony did little more than reinforce suspicions that the Department of Justice has long been more concerned with containment than accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Barr-Transcript.pdf
The GOP leadership is leaning hard on Thomas Massie to abandon his discharge petition on the Epstein files, and it reeks of the same rot that’s protected Epstein’s network for decades. Instead of standing with survivors and supporting a straightforward push for transparency, party bosses are circling the wagons and threatening Massie with political isolation. They’re using every tool of internal discipline—committee leverage, campaign funding pressure, backroom intimidation—to remind him that loyalty to the machine comes before loyalty to the truth. It’s a textbook case of power protecting itself, smothering daylight before it can seep into the cracks.What makes it even more shameful is the nakedness of the betrayal. This isn’t about some obscure policy fight or budget gimmick; this is about giving Epstein’s survivors a shot at justice and letting the public finally see what’s been buried. By trying to break Massie’s will, GOP leaders aren’t just suppressing debate, they’re actively aligning themselves with the same forces of silence and protection that made Epstein’s empire possible in the first place. It’s cowardice dressed up as party discipline, and it shows that when the chips are down, the leadership’s instinct is to cover for the powerful—not fight for the victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
The GOP leadership is leaning hard on Thomas Massie to abandon his discharge petition on the Epstein files, and it reeks of the same rot that’s protected Epstein’s network for decades. Instead of standing with survivors and supporting a straightforward push for transparency, party bosses are circling the wagons and threatening Massie with political isolation. They’re using every tool of internal discipline—committee leverage, campaign funding pressure, backroom intimidation—to remind him that loyalty to the machine comes before loyalty to the truth. It’s a textbook case of power protecting itself, smothering daylight before it can seep into the cracks.What makes it even more shameful is the nakedness of the betrayal. This isn’t about some obscure policy fight or budget gimmick; this is about giving Epstein’s survivors a shot at justice and letting the public finally see what’s been buried. By trying to break Massie’s will, GOP leaders aren’t just suppressing debate, they’re actively aligning themselves with the same forces of silence and protection that made Epstein’s empire possible in the first place. It’s cowardice dressed up as party discipline, and it shows that when the chips are down, the leadership’s instinct is to cover for the powerful—not fight for the victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Comments
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
United States