Rigour & Flow with Aiwan and Tamanda

When it comes to charity, are you the person who gives or the person who receives? That’s where this episode started. Then we got to the question we actually needed to answer: “Who is charity ultimately for?”We thought we were sitting down to have a routine conversation about charitable giving. Instead, we uncovered just how starkly race, class and colonial legacies have conditioned us to understand what the word charity even means. Aiwan grew up on a London council estate, receiving free school meals, bright orange uniform vouchers, and jumble-sale clothes. Charity caused her to carry the shame of being poor. Tamanda grew up in Botswana, attended private school and was socialised into “community service” and “charitable giving” as an unquestioned obligation of privilege. Something to be patted on the back for, and document on her CV as a marker of her “good deeds”One learned charity from the position of the recipient; the other from the position of the giver. And when those two experiences collide in the studio, the conversation gets unexpectedly raw.From the "single story" of African famine imagery, to the ethics of megachurch tithing and being awarded a certificate for "holding the sickest child" on a school trip to Gambia, we unpack the stories society tells about who deserves help and who gets to provide it.This is not a neat conversation. It's one about privilege, shame, faith, race, class, white and maybe even Black saviourism! We speak on inequality, community, aid and the psychological need to see ourselves as people who “do good”, while making others feel bad. In this episode:The giver and the given-to: How Aiwan and Tamanda learned charity from opposite sides of the class divideGiving without the performance: Botswana, Botho and community service as a collective social responsibilityWeaponising Africa’s ‘Single Story’: What 80s famine appeals and BBC Children in Need did to Black and working class children growing up in Britain.Gambia and the gross certificate: Reflecting on elite school voluntourism trip and the moment Tamanda was awarded a certificate for “holding the sickest child”The megachurch’s no-access tithe table: When institutional giving prioritises private jets while turning away an evicted family in freezing weatherWho gets to be the “saviour”?: White saviourism, Black saviourism, voluntourism and the class based hierarchies of “doing good”The ultimate systemic question: Does charity solve inequality, or does it merely soothe the conscience of the privileged while keeping structural inequality intact?🎧 Listen wherever you get your podcasts🎥 Watch the full episode on YouTube: https://youtu.be/VdQFiJz2VUY 🔁 Share this episode with someone thinking about inequality, classicism, charity and philanthropy☕ Support the show: https://buymeacoffee.com/rigourandflowThis is Part One of a two-part series interrogating the ethics, psychology and structural politics of charity and philanthropy.Please rate, review and subscribe for weekly episodes.Connect with us on:TikTokInstagramLinkedInAiAi StudiosRoots & RigourThis is an AiAi Studios Production©AiAi Studios 2025 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Is "Kidfluencing" the new child labour?Last week we explored the UK’s social media ban and whether kids should really consume social media at current rates. This week we dive into the multi-million dollar world of family vlogging and explore a different question: Should kids really be producing cute content on the very platforms they are now banned from? And what does it mean that some kids are now the primary source of income for their families?We love kid content. Like The Kabs Family and their funny roasts. But when a funny family video becomes a channel, a brand and then a media empire, is the child still just being a child? Or are they now an employee?In this episode, we follow the journey from cute family vlogs to the darker world of Bad Influence and the fall of Ruby Franke and the Eight Passengers vlog. And Aiwan takes the argument a step up: Are we witnessing a technological version of Victorian child labour? If factories have become family homes and industrial machinery has been replaced by the attention economy, who is safeguarding the children?🎙️In this episode:From Cute to Cruel: Analysing the cases of Piper Rockelle and Ruby Franke as the extreme ends of an unregulated system.The Family Media Empire: When does a hobby become a boom in    business? And what rights to children have when it comes to family vlogs?Consent vs. Compliance: Can a child really say "no" to their parent-manager? Using the contrast between Piper Rockelle and the Fury family (At Home with the Furies), we question whether a child groomed for the spotlight from birth can ever truly make an "informed choice" as an adult.The Grey Area of Employment Law: If a family channel is a registered business earning millions, are the children legally employees? We discuss the lack of labour protections for kids in the digital space compared to the highly regulated world of child actors.The Victorian Parallel: A historical look at how the 19th century factory floor has moved into the family home and the attention economy.Documentary Ethics: Where is the line between telling a human story and monetising it? 🎧 Listen wherever you get your podcasts🎥 Watch the full episode on YouTube: https://youtu.be/8SftUZvJtN4🔁 Share this episode with someone thinking about childhood, parenting or the creator economy☕ Support the show: https://buymeacoffee.com/rigourandflowPlease rate, review and subscribe for weekly episodes.Connect with us on:TikTokInstagramLinkedInAiAi StudiosRoots & RigourThis is an AiAi Studios Production©AiAi Studios 2025 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

“Stare at a wall.” That was one teenager’s viral answer to the UK social media ban. Beneath it is a darker reality of algorithmic harm and fragmented minds. Rigour & Flow is back for Season 6. And we’re decoding the under-16 ban, moving from a "nanny state" debate about over-regulation to some heartbreaking data and evidence from the Molly Rose Foundation. From the "moral panics" of the past to the algorithmic harm of the present, we explore why today’s digital landscape is qualitatively different from the world we grew up with in the 90s - the world of Nokia Snake and MSN Messenger. Drawing on her years as a teacher, Aiwan shares her firsthand account of the exact moment social media entered the classroom, turning childhood playgrounds and learning spaces into sites of permanent surveillance and fragmented attention. In turn, Tamanda reveals the devastating story and stat that changed her mind, as she moved from scepticism of a "nanny state" ban to advocating for the safeguarding of young minds after reviewing the crucial work of the Molly Rose Foundation. Together we ask: Isn’t "staring at a wall" actually the radical act of rebellion we all need? And if adults struggle to resist technologies designed to keep us scrolling, what are we really asking of our children? 🎙️ In this episode:The Philosophy of Boredom: Why great art and doctrines start by staring at a wall.The Broken Sanctity of Childhood: Why the freedom to be "unwatched" is a gift today’s kids are missing.The Fragmented Scrolling Mind: Aiwan on teaching through the rise of cyberbullying and why social media disrupts the foundation of learning.Prohibition vs. Protection: Tamanda on the work of the Molly Rose Foundation and the fatal cost of platform failure to protect young hearts and minds against harmful content.The Adult Mirror: We confront our own relationship with these "casino-style" platforms. Can we realistically expect kids to stay offline while we struggle with our own scrolling habits?Systemic Responsibility: Why safeguarding the next generation is the job of adults across family, broader community and government spheres. 🎧 Listen wherever you get your podcasts🎥 Watch the full episode on YouTube: https://youtu.be/v3cg-G2SNOQ🔁 Share with an adult assessing the impact of the UK social media ban for under-16s☕ Support the show: https://buymeacoffee.com/rigourandflowPlease rate, review and subscribe for weekly episodes.Connect with us on:TikTokInstagramLinkedInAiAi StudiosRoots & RigourThis is an AiAi Studios Production©AiAi Studios 2025 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

"It's almost comical that you can stand on African land and say it's yours. You're an immigrant, mate."In this special Living the Archive re-release for International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples, we revisit one of the defining conversations from Rigour & Flow's first year: ‘The Land Is Still Not Ours!’.Living the Archive isn't about replaying old conversations. It's about returning to them in light of everything we've learned since.When we first recorded this episode, it sparked a powerful debate about colonialism, Indigenous land rights, and the enduring legacy of empire. Returning to it now, we're struck not only by how much of that conversation remains unfinished, but by how urgently it speaks to the present. As climate change accelerates, debates around reparations, land ownership and Indigenous sovereignty have only become more urgent.Inspired by the documentary The Battle for Laikipia, this episode explores the generations-long conflict between the Indigenous Samburu people of Kenya and fourth-generation white settlers. Through the lens of the film, Aiwan and Tamanda connect questions of colonialism, land ownership, climate justice and belonging with their own family histories in Botswana and the UK.🎙️In this episode:Post-Colonial Reality: Why the struggle for Indigenous land rights didn't end with political independence.Institutional Legacy: How colonial systems of land ownership continue to shape the present.The Climate Intersection: Why climate justice and racial justice are inseparable.Property vs. Belonging: The tension between European ideas of private property and Indigenous communal traditions.A Story from Botswana: What Tamanda's family farm reveals about policing, belonging and colonial institutions.Land & Reparations: Why justice must include both land and historical reckoning.Whether you're listening for the first time or returning to this conversation, this episode is an invitation to think differently about the stories we inherit. Because before we can decide who owns the land, we first have to ask where the story begins.🎧 Listen wherever you get your podcasts🎥 Watch the full episode on YouTube: https://youtu.be/KLF0TuaoYDc 🔁 Share with someone thinking about land, reparations and change☕ Want to support the show? Buy us a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/rigourandflow    Please rate, review and subscribe for weekly episodes.Connect with us on:TikTokInstagramLinkedInAiAi StudiosRoots & RigourThis is an AiAi Studios Production©AiAi Studios 2025 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In the next instalment of our Feedwarmer series, we’re sharing the creators and conversations currently shaping our own thinking. This week’s recommendation is a thoughtful, intellectually rich and deeply personal exploration of faith, power and knowledge.As Tamanda begins her postdoctoral research at the University of the Western Cape's Desmond Tutu Centre for Religion and Social Justice, she introduces Aiwan to Belonging: Gender, Sex & Spirituality - a new podcast hosted by Reverend Mpho Tutu van Furth and Professor Marceline Tutu van Furth.In this episode, they sit down with leading South African womanist theologian, Professor Sarojini Nadar, to explore embodied knowledge, biblical interpretation and what happens when religious traditions are used to justify oppression.The conversation resonates deeply with Aiwan’s own experiences growing up around fundamentalist Christianity. This opens up an honest discussion about the lasting impact of religious conditioning before exploring one of Tamanda’s more recent encounters with the Bible as a tool of oppression.🎙️In this episode:The Bible as a Tool of Power: Why sacred texts can become dangerous in the wrong hands.The "Three I’s" of Interpretation: Breaking down inspired, infallible, and inerrant views of scripture.Embodied Knowledge: Why your body’s "felt sense" is a vital form of authority and resistance.The Girl in the Denim: How small acts of rebellion - like wearing jeans or a denim skirt - can lead to radical scholarship or creative practice.Podcasting as Public Theology: How Black women are creating new spaces for knowledge, faith and resistance.We are playing the first half of this powerful original conversation. If it leaves you wanting more - and we think it will - we highly encourage you to listen to the full episode of Belonging: Gender, Sex & Spirituality.🎧 Listen wherever you get your podcasts🎥 Watch the full episode on YouTube: https://youtu.be/ZeEq_GXV_vA🔁 Share this with someone whose body knew something long before they had the words to explain it.☕ Want to support the show? Buy us a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/rigourandflow    Please rate, review and subscribe for weekly episodes.Connect with us on:TikTokInstagramLinkedInAiAi StudiosRoots & RigourThis is an AiAi Studios Production©AiAi Studios 2025 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.