Pass the MSRA: Free Podcasts

What do you do when five tasks are all urgent — but you only have two hands and ten minutes?This episode is a high-impact deep dive into clinical and professional prioritisation under extreme pressure, using a strict, exam-safe hierarchy that mirrors exactly how the MSRA SJT expects you to think.You will master the TRCCA prioritisation framework — a reliable, repeatable structure for choosing the single safest action when multiple options are technically correct.You’ll learn to prioritise using:✅ Time-criticality (T) — immediate life threats✅ Risk reduction (R) — imminent instability✅ Capacity creation (C) — delegation & cognitive safety✅ Communication (C) — candour & updates✅ Administration (A) — the lowest-priority workloadAcross three fully worked scenarios, you’ll see how this hierarchy applies to:• Acute ward crises (sepsis vs hyperkalaemia)• Handover chaos and dangerous admin traps• Theatre near-misses, patient candour & safety cultureYou will learn:✅ Why sepsis bundles often outrank hyperkalaemia in SJT scoring✅ Why delegation is a clinical intervention, not just admin✅ Why doing TTOs yourself is a dangerous professionalism trap✅ How to prioritise candour over documentation after safety incidents✅ The correct sequence for Safety Huddle → Candour → LFPSE → PSIRF✅ Why blame-focused confrontation is always the lowest-scoring optionThis episode is essential for:• MSRA SJT candidates• Foundation Doctors & GP Trainees• Doctors struggling with prioritisation questions• Anyone who feels overwhelmed by competing clinical demands📎 More MSRA resources to accompany this episode:https://passthemsra.com00:00 — The five-task overload problem00:18 — Why instinct fails under pressure00:40 — Introducing the TRCCA prioritisation framework01:40 — T = Time-critical life threats01:57 — R = Risk reduction & imminent instability02:19 — C = Capacity creation & delegation03:24 — Why capacity creation outranks communication03:41 — Final rung: Administration is always last04:01 — Scenario 1: Ward crisis (Sepsis vs Hyperkalaemia)04:32 — Why sepsis often outranks potassium in SJT scoring05:38 — Capacity creation via NIC support06:12 — Communication after stabilisation06:28 — Admin as lowest priority06:50 — Scenario 2: Handover chaos07:28 — Unstable COPD vs severe hypokalaemia08:09 — The TTO administrative trap08:27 — Delegation as rank-3 clinical intervention09:14 — Final correct ranking explained09:36 — Scenario 3: Theatre near-miss10:10 — Safety huddle as rank-1 priority10:38 — Candour before documentation11:03 — LFPSE vs PSIRF explained11:46 — Why blame emails destroy safety culture12:36 — Three non-negotiable prioritisation rules13:36 — Capacity creation as a professional skill14:03 — Final take-home prioritisation mindset

High scores in the MSRA SJT are not about clinical knowledge — they are about safe, predictable, GMC-aligned professional judgment under pressure. This episode is your professional “autopilot” playbook for consistently choosing the safest, highest-scoring options in both Ranking and Best 3 of 8 questions.In this deep-dive, you will master the exact thinking framework used by top-scoring candidates, built directly from GMC Good Medical Practice and real SJT marking logic.You will learn:✅ The 5 non-negotiable GMC principles behind all high-scoring answers✅ Why patient safety always outranks feelings, reputation, and convenience✅ The absolute rule of working within competence & escalating early✅ How to manage conflict, confidentiality, consent & professionalism safely✅ The legal Duty of Candour and your obligations after harm✅ The SAFE-EC checklist for instantly screening any SJT option✅ The scoring difference between Ranking vs Best-3 questions✅ Why choosing 4 options = automatic zero in Best-3✅ The Anchors Strategy for Ranking questions (best vs worst first)✅ The TRIO TEMPLATE for crafting perfect Best-3 answers✅ The 4 automatic fail red flags (friends/family, public conflict, delay, falsification)✅ The most common “polite but deadly” trap answers candidates fall into✅ Why documentation is your strongest legal and professional defenceThis episode is essential for:• MSRA SJT candidates• Foundation Doctors & GP Trainees• Anyone struggling with Best-3 and Ranking strategy• Doctors who want to think like a safe, regulator-proof clinician📎 More MSRA resources to accompany this episode:https://passthemsra.com00:00 — Why SJT is about judgment, not knowledge01:00 — What the exam is really testing01:42 — The 5 core GMC principles behind all high scores01:45 — Principle 1: Patient safety first02:17 — Principle 2: Work within competence & escalate03:03 — Why “not wanting to bother seniors” loses marks03:30 — Principle 3: Communication & professionalism04:05 — Principle 4: Teamworking & Duty of Candour04:41 — Principle 5: Fairness, boundaries & integrity05:13 — The SAFE-EC rapid screening tool06:15 — How Ranking questions are marked07:14 — The Anchors Strategy (best vs worst first)07:59 — How Best-3 questions are scored08:02 — Why picking 4 options = zero marks08:32 — The TRIO TEMPLATE for perfect Best-3 answers08:49 — Step 1: Immediate safety action09:03 — Step 2: Senior/policy escalation09:20 — Step 3: Communication & documentation10:14 — The 4 automatic fail red flags11:01 — Common “polite” trap answers12:17 — Why “wait until appraisal” is unsafe13:20 — Off-duty emergencies: your duty still applies14:07 — How to identify subtle trap options15:02 — Worked example using the TRIO framework18:26 — Why documentation is your strongest legal defence19:20 — “Be boringly safe”: the single winning mindset20:05 — Final professional take-home message

One disclosure. One plea for secrecy. One child at home.Domestic abuse is where patient trust collides with absolute legal duty — and your actions in the first few minutes can determine whether harm escalates or is prevented.In this high-stakes MSRA SJT deep dive, you will master the exact UK-legal, GMC-aligned domestic abuse safeguarding framework — with zero ambiguity on when confidentiality must be overridden to protect life.You will learn:✅ The Domestic Abuse Act 2021 definition — including economic abuse✅ Why children are automatic safeguarding victims if DA is present✅ Your GMC-mandated first response: private inquiry + validation✅ The immediate safety checklist (injuries, police, safe transport)✅ Why mediation or “hearing both sides” is always unsafe✅ The DASH (SafeLives) 24-item risk assessment✅ Non-fatal strangulation (NFS) as a medical & homicide emergency✅ High-risk red flags: weapons, pregnancy, separation✅ Escalation to MARAC for high-risk cases✅ The role of the IDVA as the patient’s key advocate✅ When confidentiality must be breached lawfully✅ The minimum-necessary information sharing rule✅ Safe documentation in the era of online patient portals✅ The complete SAFE HOME safeguarding mnemonic✅ Why couples counselling during abuse is dangerous✅ Three non-negotiable professional safeguarding rulesThis episode is essential for:• MSRA SJT candidates• Foundation Doctors & GP Trainees• Emergency, medical, surgical & community clinicians• Anyone responsible for adult & child safeguarding in the NHS📎 More MSRA resources to accompany this episode:https://passthemsra.com00:00 — High-stakes disclosure scenario: coercive control & a child at home00:57 — Why domestic abuse is one of the highest-risk clinical duties01:19 — Core professional mindset for DA safeguarding01:57 — Domestic Abuse Act 2021: full legal definition02:28 — Economic abuse explained03:00 — Children as automatic safeguarding victims03:24 — GMC duties when abuse is disclosed03:56 — Immediate best-practice response: privacy & validation04:27 — Model validation phrase that saves lives04:43 — Immediate safety checklist: injuries, police, transport05:02 — Communication safety traps (texts, letters, unsafe addresses)05:20 — Why mediation with the partner is always unsafe06:02 — Introduction to the DASH risk assessment06:14 — Why DASH is used across all UK agencies06:41 — Non-fatal strangulation (NFS) as a homicide predictor07:25 — Other urgent red flags: weapons, pregnancy, separation07:51 — Why children always mandate safeguarding referral08:08 — When and how to escalate to MARAC08:43 — The role of the IDVA09:04 — The full step-by-step safeguarding sequence09:41 — When confidentiality can be lawfully overridden10:25 — Minimum-necessary information sharing10:59 — Digital records & patient portal safeguarding risks11:49 — SAFE HOME mnemonic explained12:14 — Three absolute professional takeaways13:01 — Why couples counselling during abuse is dangerous13:36 — Final life-saving clinical & professional message

Child safeguarding is the highest legal and ethical duty in UK medicine — and few scenarios are as emotionally difficult or as heavily tested in the MSRA SJT as the conflict between Gillick competence, confidentiality, and mandatory protection.In this powerful deep dive, you will master the exact UK-legal, GMC-aligned framework for acting immediately and lawfully when a child or young person discloses abuse, exploitation, or risk — even when they beg for secrecy.You will learn:✅ The legal difference between Section 17 vs Section 47 (Children Act 1989)✅ Why reasonable suspicion — not proof — triggers duty to act✅ Why Gillick competence NEVER overrides safeguarding when significant harm is suspected✅ The absolute rule: never promise secrecy to a child at risk✅ When to involve police immediately (999 triggers)✅ Why children must always be seen alone for safeguarding history✅ How to handle abuse by a person in a position of trust (teachers, carers)✅ The mandatory dual-referral: MASH + LADO✅ How to share information lawfully without consent✅ The minimum necessary information rule✅ How to create court-safe documentation using verbatim quotes✅ The complete CHILD SAFE safeguarding mnemonic✅ The most dangerous MSRA SJT trap answers that cause automatic failureThis episode is essential for:• MSRA SJT candidates• Foundation Doctors & GP Trainees• Paediatric, GP, Emergency & Community clinicians• Anyone responsible for safeguarding children and young people in the NHS📎 More MSRA resources to accompany this episode:https://passthemsra.com00:00 — High-stakes scenario: 15-year-old discloses sexual abuse by a teacher01:00 — Why this dilemma defines child safeguarding practice01:18 — Children Act 1989: Section 17 vs Section 4702:16 — Early help vs formal child protection02:43 — Working Together to Safeguard Children (2023)03:07 — Acting on reasonable suspicion, not proof03:42 — Immediate safety first & 999 triggers04:02 — Seeing the child alone: why privacy is non-negotiable04:34 — Never promise secrecy: the exact phrases to use05:18 — Gillick competence vs safeguarding: the critical legal boundary06:03 — Power imbalance & position of trust abuse06:28 — Bruising in pre-mobile infants: automatic Section 47 trigger07:00 — Dual-referral requirement: MASH + LADO07:44 — First–Next–Last referral pathway08:36 — Lawful information sharing without consent09:02 — Secure communication rules09:10 — Gold-standard safeguarding documentation09:48 — CHILD SAFE mnemonic explained10:58 — Three non-negotiable safeguarding principles11:27 — Maintaining therapeutic trust after referral12:14 — Final professional & exam-safe message

Safeguarding is the single highest-stakes professionalism domain in UK medicine. It sits at the intersection of clinical care, the law, ethics, and patient safety — and it is one of the most heavily weighted areas in the MSRA SJT.In this comprehensive deep dive, you will learn the exact UK-legal, GMC-aligned safeguarding framework that allows you to act rapidly, lawfully, and defensibly when the pressure is at its highest.This episode brings together:✅ The GMC duty to act on suspicion, not proof✅ Children Act 1989 thresholds — Section 17 vs Section 47✅ Care Act 2014 Section 42 for adult safeguarding✅ The five-step universal safeguarding pathway✅ How to override confidentiality lawfully and safely✅ What “minimum necessary information” really means✅ Making Safeguarding Personal (MSP) and adult autonomy✅ The six safeguarding principles under the Care Act✅ High-risk red flags including non-fatal strangulation✅ Correct use of MASH, LADO, MARAC & Adult Social Care✅ How to create court-safe documentation with verbatim quotes✅ The most dangerous MSRA SJT safeguarding trapsYou will also master:• The SAFE HOME domestic abuseDA mnemonic• The DORS referral-route framework• The four core safeguard patterns the SJT repeatedly testsThis episode is essential for:• MSRA SJT candidates• Foundation Doctors & GP Trainees• Emergency, GP, Paediatric & Community clinicians• Any doctor responsible for safeguarding in the NHS📎 More MSRA resources to accompany this episode:https://passthemsra.com00:00 — Why safeguarding is the highest-stakes MSRA SJT topic01:42 — High-tension disclosure scenario: child begging for secrecy02:21 — The single core safeguarding rule03:13 — GMC duty to disclose for safety04:13 — Acting on suspicion, not proof05:22 — Lawful information sharing & minimum necessary rule06:25 — Child safeguarding law: Children Act 198906:49 — Section 47: significant harm threshold07:04 — Section 17: child in need & cumulative harm08:03 — When S17 escalates into S4709:02 — Adult safeguarding: Care Act 2014 Section 4209:48 — The six Care Act safeguarding principles10:23 — Making Safeguarding Personal (MSP) in practice10:59 — Capacity vs protection in adult cases11:26 — The universal five-step safeguarding pathway11:42 — Step 1: Immediate safety & 999 triggers12:48 — Non-fatal strangulation as a homicide predictor13:26 — Step 2: See alone, assess, explain confidentiality limits15:01 — Step 3: Senior escalation & same-day statutory referral16:13 — MASH, LADO, MARAC & Adult Social Care pathways16:59 — Step 4: Lawful and secure information sharing17:40 — Step 5: Court-safe documentation & planning18:13 — SAFE HOME mnemonic for domestic abuse19:04 — DORS framework for referral routes19:53 — Pattern 1: Bruising in pre-mobile infant21:11 — Pattern 2: Allegation against a professional (LADO)22:03 — Pattern 3: High-risk domestic abuse23:10 — Pattern 4: Adult self-neglect & hoarding24:05 — The five most dangerous safeguarding traps24:58 — Three absolute safeguarding rules for the MSRA25:22 — Final professional take-home message

Respecting culture and faith is not a “soft extra” in UK medicine — it is a legal duty, a GMC professionalism requirement, and a core MSRA SJT scoring domain. These scenarios test whether you can balance respect for beliefs with valid consent, equality law, and patient safety under pressure.In this high-yield deep dive, you will master the exact UK-legal, GMC-aligned framework for handling cultural and religious requests safely, lawfully, and without discriminatory shortcuts.You will learn:✅ Why religion and belief are protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010✅ Your absolute duty of fairness and non-discrimination✅ The legal and ethical rules for valid consent with language barriers✅ Why family interpreters are unsafe for consent✅ The Accessible Information Standard (AIS) and mandatory communication support✅ How to manage refusal of life-saving treatment for religious reasons✅ The four pillars of capacity assessment in high-risk refusal✅ How to offer clinically safe alternatives without coercion✅ The five-step First–Next–Last framework for belief-based dilemmas✅ High-yield mnemonics (FASST & ASK-BELIEF) for instant exam recall✅ The most dangerous MSRA SJT trap answers that look efficient but fail the lawThis episode is essential for:• MSRA SJT candidates• Foundation Doctors & GP Trainees• Emergency, medical, surgical & community clinicians• Anyone responsible for consent, communication and equality in the NHS📎 More MSRA resources to accompany this episode:https://passthemsra.com00:00 — Why culture, faith & safety create high-stakes clinical dilemmas01:13 — Scenario: blood transfusion refusal with language barrier02:25 — Why efficiency must never override valid consent03:02 — Religion & belief as protected characteristics (Equality Act 2010)03:55 — GMC Good Medical Practice: fairness, communication & shared decisions04:31 — Shared decision-making & the role of capacity05:18 — The 5-step First–Next–Last clinical framework05:20 — Step 1: Ask about beliefs (never assume)05:32 — Step 2: Clarify clinical impact05:46 — Step 3: Arrange professional support & interpreters (AIS)06:07 — Step 4: Offer clinically safe alternatives06:22 — Step 5: Document decisions & risk discussion06:44 — The FASST mnemonic explained07:24 — ASK-BELIEF documentation framework07:55 — Pattern 1: Refusal of blood products08:14 — Pattern 2: Reasonable adjustments (prayer, modesty, timing)09:09 — Trap 1: Using family as interpreters10:12 — Trap 2: Refusing adjustments as “inconvenient”10:36 — Trap 3: Delaying care for a specific clinician10:59 — Immediate red flags for escalation11:13 — The 10-second rapid safety rules11:58 — Three non-negotiable professional takeaways12:23 — High-level rapid recall framework13:22 — Core terms: AIS, protected characteristics, shared decision-making, capacity14:18 — Final clinical & exam-safe message

Neglect is one of the most frequently missed — and most devastating — forms of safeguarding harm. Unlike acute abuse, neglect hides in patterns, trajectories, and small repeated failures, and the MSRA SJT is specifically designed to test whether you act on cumulative risk rather than isolated snapshots.In this high-yield deep dive, you will master the exact UK-legal, GMC-aligned framework for recognising and escalating both:• Child neglect through cumulative harm• Adult self-neglect including hoarding and severe care avoidanceYou will learn:✅ Why single incidents are rarely the trigger — patterns are✅ How to build a clean safeguarding chronology✅ The legal difference between Section 17 vs Section 47 (Children Act)✅ When Section 42 (Care Act) is triggered for adults✅ Why consent is NOT required to start safeguarding when harm risk exists✅ How to document objectively using facts, quotes, and timelines✅ When to escalate to MASH for children✅ When to escalate to Adult Social Care for self-neglect✅ How to manage hoarding, fire risk, and refusal of care✅ The role of Making Safeguarding Personal (MSP) in adults✅ The five most dangerous exam traps that lead to automatic mark loss✅ High-yield mnemonics (NEGLECT-CT & CHORE) for rapid recall✅ The FIRST–NEXT–LAST escalation structure for both child and adult neglectThis episode is essential for:• MSRA SJT candidates• Foundation Doctors & GP Trainees• Paediatrics, GP, Emergency & Community clinicians• Anyone responsible for safeguarding decisions in the NHS📎 More MSRA resources to accompany this episode:https://passthemsra.com00:00 — Introduction: why neglect is one of the hardest safeguarding diagnoses01:04 — Child cumulative harm vs adult self-neglect01:35 — GP scenario: the classic cumulative neglect pattern02:18 — The core legal & professional duty to act early03:00 — Why the SJT penalises passive “watch and wait”04:28 — The three non-negotiable GMC principles05:38 — Step 1: Scan for cumulative patterns06:19 — Step 2: Objective documentation & chronology building07:05 — Step 3: Lawful information sharing without consent07:56 — Step 4: Referral & statutory thresholds08:23 — Section 17 vs Section 47 thresholds for children08:58 — Section 42 Care Act threshold for adults09:34 — Step 5: Multi-agency coordination10:11 — The NEGLECT-CT mnemonic explained10:48 — The CHORE framework for adult self-neglect11:34 — MSP and capacity in adult self-neglect12:20 — The five highest-risk SJT trap answers13:28 — Immediate red-flag neglect scenarios14:12 — Hoarding, fire risk & emergency escalation15:00 — Three final professional takeaways16:40 — Final clinical & exam-safe message

In safeguarding, choosing the wrong referral route — or delaying by even hours — can place patients at serious risk and expose you to major professional consequences. Yet confusion around MASH, LADO, MARAC and MAPPA remains one of the most common causes of MSRA SJT errors.This episode gives you a clear, operational, exam-safe framework to instantly identify the correct multi-agency “door”, share information lawfully, and document defensibly under pressure.You’ll master:✅ Why multi-agency safeguarding exists (no single service ever has the full picture)✅ The concept of organisational memory and why ad-hoc emails always lose marks✅ MASH as the single front door for new child safeguarding concerns✅ LADO for any allegation against a professional in a position of trust✅ The one-working-day rule for notifying LADO✅ MARAC for high-risk domestic abuse only✅ The role of the DASH risk assessment in triggering MARAC✅ MAPPA for managing violent and sexual offenders in the community✅ When clinicians contribute information rather than lead MAPPA✅ The FIRST–NEXT–LAST escalation sequence✅ The DOORS mnemonic for flawless high-scoring actions✅ Lawful breach of confidentiality to prevent serious harm✅ Common exam traps that cause automatic mark loss✅ High-yield model phrases that demonstrate senior-level understandingThis episode is essential for:• MSRA SJT candidates• Foundation Doctors and GP Trainees• Emergency, medical and paediatric clinicians• Anyone responsible for raising safeguarding concerns in the NHS📎 More MSRA resources to accompany this episode:https://passthemsra.com00:00 — Scenario: witnessing inappropriate behaviour by a colleague01:25 — The single safeguarding takeaway: right door, lawful sharing, documentation02:06 — Why multi-agency safeguarding exists02:48 — Organisational memory & formal escalation03:38 — The four safeguarding “doors” framework03:48 — MASH: the front door for new child safeguarding concerns04:29 — LADO: allegations against professionals in positions of trust05:06 — The one-working-day LADO notification rule05:19 — MARAC: high-risk domestic abuse only05:35 — DASH risk assessment as the MARAC trigger06:06 — MAPPA: managing violent & sexual offenders06:40 — The FIRST–NEXT–LAST safeguarding sequence07:32 — The DOORS mnemonic (Determine, Obtain, Offer, Refer, Summarise)08:02 — Lawful information sharing & documentation protection09:01 — Mixed-risk scenario: adult DA + children — which door first?09:39 — High-risk exam traps that lose marks instantly10:29 — Model phrases for MARAC and LADO referrals11:09 — The three golden safeguarding rules12:10 — Why documentation is often the most critical safeguard

Domestic abuse is one of the most legally complex, emotionally charged, and high-risk disclosures a clinician will ever face. In one moment, patient trust collides with your statutory safeguarding duty — and exactly how you respond can determine whether harm escalates or is prevented.In this essential deep-dive, you’ll learn the full GMC-aligned, legally defensible domestic abuse framework for UK clinicians, including when confidentiality must be overridden to prevent serious harm.You’ll master:✅ The Domestic Abuse Act 2021 definition (including coercive control & economic abuse)✅ Why children are automatic victims if they witness abuse✅ The mandatory private inquiry & validation first response✅ Immediate operational safety rules (never contact unsafe addresses)✅ The DASH risk assessment tool (24-item national standard)✅ Non-fatal strangulation (NFS) as a medical & homicide red-flag✅ High-risk escalation to MARAC (multi-agency coordination)✅ The role of the IDVA as the patient’s primary advocate✅ When you are required to disclose without consent✅ How to share safely using the minimum-necessary rule✅ Safe documentation in the era of shared patient portals✅ Why couples counselling is dangerous when abuse is active✅ A complete step-by-step safeguarding workflow✅ The SAFE HOME mnemonic for instant recall under pressureThis episode is essential for:• MSRA SJT candidates• Foundation Doctors & GP Trainees• Emergency, medical, surgical & community clinicians• Anyone responsible for adult & child safeguarding in the NHS📎 More MSRA resources to accompany this episode:https://passthemsra.com00:00 — High-stakes domestic abuse disclosure scenario01:02 — Core professional safeguarding mindset02:04 — Domestic Abuse Act 2021: full legal definition02:30 — Economic abuse explained03:04 — Children as automatic safeguarding victims03:24 — GMC duties when abuse is disclosed04:03 — Immediate best-practice response: privacy & validation04:44 — Immediate safety checklist05:03 — Communication safety traps (texts, letters, emails)05:28 — Why mediation with the partner is always unsafe06:04 — DASH risk assessment explained07:01 — Non-fatal strangulation (NFS) as a homicide predictor07:28 — Other high-risk red flags (weapons, pregnancy, separation)08:13 — When to escalate to MARAC08:43 — The role of the IDVA09:04 — The full step-by-step safeguarding workflow09:41 — When confidentiality can be lawfully overridden10:25 — Minimum-necessary information sharing11:08 — Digital records & safeguarding documentation risks11:49 — The SAFE HOME mnemonic explained12:21 — Three non-negotiable professional takeaways13:09 — Why couples counselling during abuse is dangerous13:49 — Final safety-first professional message

Cultural awareness, equality, and valid consent sit at the very centre of medical law, GMC professionalism, and MSRA SJT success. These scenarios are not “soft skills” — they are high-stakes legal and safety decisions where one wrong shortcut can invalidate consent, breach the Equality Act, and place patients at serious risk.In this essential deep-dive, you’ll learn the exact defensible, GMC-aligned framework for navigating culture, faith, language barriers, discrimination, and equitable access — even under extreme clinical urgency.We cover:✅ Why equity ≠ equality and how blind “fairness” creates unsafe care✅ The Equality Act 2010 and the nine protected characteristics✅ Direct vs indirect discrimination (and the most common exam traps)✅ The GMC Good Medical Practice 2024 duties on fairness and personal beliefs✅ The Accessible Information Standard (AIS) — your mandatory legal duties✅ Why family interpreters = invalid consent in high-risk care✅ Managing refusal of life-saving treatment on religious or cultural grounds✅ The four pillars of capacity assessment in urgent scenarios✅ The five-step unified framework for culture and equity dilemmas✅ High-yield mnemonics (FAITHS, FAIR, T3) for instant exam recall✅ The most dangerous SJT trap answers that look polite but breach the lawYou’ll also master the four core MSRA SJT patterns:• Urgent language barriers• Discriminatory colleagues• Faith-based refusal of treatment• Systemic access failures in deprived communitiesThis episode is essential for:• MSRA SJT candidates• Foundation Doctors and GP Trainees• Emergency, medical, and surgical clinicians• Anyone responsible for safe, equitable NHS care📎 More MSRA resources to accompany this episode:https://passthemsra.com00:00 — Why culture, equity & consent are high-stakes clinical decisions01:10 — Urgent refusal with language barrier: the perfect storm scenario03:03 — Valid consent & the danger of family interpreters04:31 — Why this topic is relentlessly tested in the MSRA SJT05:18 — Equality vs equity: the difference that saves lives07:10 — Equality Act 2010 & the nine protected characteristics07:52 — Direct vs indirect discrimination explained09:05 — System-level indirect discrimination & reasonable adjustments09:46 — GMC duties: personal beliefs must never delay care10:04 — The Accessible Information Standard (AIS): the 5-step legal process11:12 — Professional vs family interpreting: non-negotiable rules12:24 — Respecting beliefs & refusal of life-saving treatment12:53 — Capacity assessment for high-risk refusals13:38 — Unified 5-step framework for culture & equity17:11 — Documentation, flagging & defensible audit trails17:50 — FAITHS mnemonic for belief-based refusal18:43 — FAIR mnemonic for discrimination scenarios19:07 — Core 20 PLUS 5 & the T3 strategy for inequalities20:17 — Four high-yield MSRA SJT pattern types24:35 — The most dangerous trap answers explained28:09 — Rapid-fire exam application scenarios28:41 — Final exam-safe cultural & consent logic

Child safeguarding is one of the most high-pressure, high-stakes responsibilities any UK clinician will ever face. One moment, one sentence from a child, can instantly shift your role from clinician to first responder for protection.In this essential deep-dive, you’ll learn the exact GMC-aligned, legally correct step-by-step approach to recognising, referring, and documenting safeguarding concerns in children.We cover:✅ The core mindset: Believe, protect, record, refer✅ Working Together to Safeguard Children (2023) guidance✅ The legal thresholds: Section 17 (Child in Need) vs Section 47 (Significant Harm)✅ Acting on reasonable suspicion — not proof✅ The absolute red flag: any injury in a pre-mobile infant✅ What to do when a child discloses abuse directly✅ When to call 999 immediately✅ Why consent is NOT required to refer when a child is at risk✅ The lawful basis for sharing under public interest✅ How to see the child alone and manage confidentiality safely✅ The non-negotiables of court-safe documentation✅ The most dangerous exam and real-world safeguarding trapsYou’ll also learn two powerful memory frameworks:• The Three Qs — Quote, Quick referral, Quiet lawful sharing• RAPID — Recognise, Act, Protect, Involve, DocumentThis episode is essential for:• MSRA SJT candidates• Foundation Doctors and GP Trainees• Paediatric, GP, and Emergency clinicians• Anyone responsible for safeguarding children in the NHS📎 More MSRA resources to accompany this episode:https://passthemsra.com00:00 — High-stakes clinical disclosure scenario01:01 — Core safeguarding mindset: Believe, protect, record, refer01:24 — Legal framework: Working Together 202301:54 — Section 47 vs Section 17 thresholds02:24 — Acting on reasonable suspicion (not proof)03:00 — Key red flags & clinical warning signs03:10 — Absolute must-refer: injury in pre-mobile infants03:40 — Step 1: Immediate safety & police involvement04:06 — Step 2: Seeing the child alone safely04:15 — Managing confidentiality properly with children04:47 — Step 3: Same-day referral to Children’s Social Care05:11 — Consent myths & lawful information sharing06:25 — Gold-standard safeguarding documentation07:06 — Safeguarding mnemonics: Three Qs & RAPID07:39 — Most dangerous safeguarding traps08:05 — Secure communication & data protection08:19 — Final high-yield safeguarding protocol08:49 — Complex cases: FII & caregiver-generated illness09:22 — Final take-home safeguarding logic

Discrimination in healthcare is never subtle in its impact — even when it appears subtle in form. In this essential deep-dive, we break down exactly how UK doctors must act when faced with discrimination, bias, or barriers to equitable care, using clear GMC-aligned decision frameworks and the legal backbone of the Equality Act 2010.You’ll learn:✅ The nine protected characteristics and what unlawful discrimination means in practice✅ The difference between direct, indirect discrimination, harassment, and victimisation✅ Why indirect discrimination (policies that disadvantage groups) is a major exam and real-world trap✅ The Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) and your responsibility to challenge unfair systems✅ The Accessible Information Standard (AIS) and your absolute duty to provide interpreters and adjustments✅ Why using family members as interpreters is always unsafe and low-scoring✅ A high-yield step-by-step clinical framework for managing discrimination immediately and safely✅ The most dangerous trap answers that repeatedly fail MSRA SJT candidatesThis episode gives you:• Immediate intervention phrases to use on the ward or in clinic• A defensible escalation and documentation pathway• Clear guidance on challenging senior colleagues safely• A system-level mindset that protects both patients and your professional integrityEssential listening for:• MSRA SJT candidates• Foundation doctors and GP trainees• Hospital doctors and clinical leaders• Anyone responsible for equitable NHS care📎 More MSRA resources to accompany this episode:https://passthemsra.com00:00 — Why discrimination is a high-stakes clinical issue00:42 — Real-world clinical discrimination scenarios01:27 — The core professional duty: zero tolerance & immediate action02:31 — GMC fairness principles & prohibited behaviour02:52 — Equality Act 2010 & the nine protected characteristics03:28 — Direct vs indirect discrimination explained03:55 — Digital systems & indirect exclusion04:45 — Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) in practice05:18 — The STEPWISE clinical response framework05:29 — Step 1: Spot and stop06:28 — Step 2: Adjust and include06:48 — Step 3: Escalate and record07:02 — Step 4: Reflect and learn07:15 — Immediate response mnemonics & memory hooks07:39 — Accessible Information Standard (AIS)08:43 — Why relatives must never interpret09:05 — Common exam trap answers10:40 — High-scoring rapid-fire decision logic11:28 — Final key clinical takeaways12:26 — Professional accountability & system-wide change

Adult Safeguarding Deep Dive: Section 42, DASH & MARAC Explained (UK Clinical Law)Adult safeguarding is one of the highest-stakes areas of UK clinical practice — where patient autonomy, legal duty, confidentiality, and immediate safety collide.In this deep-dive episode, we break down the full legal and clinical safeguarding framework every UK doctor must understand, including:✅ The Care Act 2014 Section 42 Duty to Inquire✅ What legally defines an “adult at risk”✅ How Making Safeguarding Personal (MSP) shapes every decision✅ The six safeguarding principles (Empowerment, Prevention, Proportionality, Protection, Partnership, Accountability)✅ The updated Domestic Abuse Act 2021 definition✅ The DASH risk assessment tool✅ When and how cases escalate to MARAC✅ When confidentiality must be overridden to prevent serious harm✅ The most dangerous exam and real-world safeguarding pitfallsYou’ll also learn a high-yield step-by-step clinical framework (SAFE42) to apply instantly under pressure in GP, hospital, and emergency settings.This episode is essential for:• MSRA SJT preparation• GP trainees and foundation doctors• Clinicians managing domestic abuse and vulnerable adults• Anyone responsible for safeguarding decisions in the NHS📎 More MSRA resources to accompany this episode:https://passthemsra.com00:00 — Clinical scenarios: financial abuse & domestic violence01:28 — Legal definition of adult safeguarding (Care Act 2014)02:35 — Section 42 duty to inquire explained03:29 — Making Safeguarding Personal (MSP)04:28 — The six safeguarding principles (PPPPA + Empowerment)05:18 — Proportionality: least intrusive lawful response06:15 — Domestic Abuse Act 2021 definition07:07 — DASH risk assessment tool07:41 — MARAC: multi-agency high-risk protection08:13 — Immediate police escalation red flags08:55 — SAFE42 step-by-step clinical framework10:42 — Confidentiality vs public interest12:04 — Common safeguarding decision traps13:18 — Final clinical take-home framework14:56 — Professional accountability & documentation

Professional dilemmas are the MSRA’s pressure cooker — where convenience, loyalty and institutional targets collide with GMC duties, safety, candour and integrity. This episode teaches the three universal moves that protect patients and your registration: uphold standards, offer a constructive alternative, and escalate with documentation. Using high-stakes scenarios involving unsafe shortcuts, documentation dishonesty, and conflicts of interest, we show you exactly how to act under pressure.0:00 Why ethical dilemmas define professionalism00:20 Pressure-cooker conflicts explained00:58 The foundational rule: integrity > convenience01:40 What the GMC is actually testing02:20 Safety vs team loyalty03:10 The five behaviours that always fail04:00 The three-move universal framework05:00 Scenario 1 — Consent vs institutional pressure06:00 Why shortcuts invalidate consent07:00 Three safe moves for pressure to “rush consent”08:00 Script: how to decline + offer alternative09:20 Scenario 2 — Documentation dishonesty10:00 Candour, audit trails and legal risk10:40 Addendum vs altering the original note11:40 Why retroactive edits destroy trust12:10 Escalating unsafe pressure13:00 Scenario 3 — High-value gifts & boundaries13:50 Conflict of interest explained14:20 Safe refusal + alternative + documentation15:20 Why perception matters as much as reality16:10 Universal tie-break rules17:10 Three high-yield takeaways18:10 Final reflection: courage under pressure• Professional dilemmas test values under pressure, not knowledge.• Integrity, transparency and escalation ALWAYS outrank convenience, blind loyalty or targets.• Unsafe shortcuts (e.g., rushing consent) = invalid care + legal risk.• Never falsify or soften notes — only dated factual addenda maintain governance.• High-value gifts create real or perceived conflicts of interest — decline, redirect, document.• Every safe action contains: safety → solution → escalation → documentation.Three-Move FrameworkUphold standards (decline unsafe request)Offer a constructive solution (safe alternative)Escalate if pressure continuesIntegrity Triggers — “SID”S – Safety threatenedI – Integrity challengedD – Documentation requested dishonestlyAddendum Rule — “DAT”D – DatedA – Addendum onlyT – Truthful, factual, neutral languageGifts Boundary Rule — “PAD”P – Politely declineA – Alternative (charity/feedback)D – Document tension/insistenceEthical dilemmas are not trick questions — they assess whether you protect safety, truth and fairness even when pressured. Apply the three-move framework: decline unsafe shortcuts, propose a compliant alternative, and escalate persistent risk. Document factually, guard your boundaries, and remember: professionalism is proved in the moments when it’s hardest to uphold.Links:• passthemsra.com – Complete MSRA revision, notes, mocks, flashcards• freemsra.com – Free podcasts, threads and rapid-learning guides• msra.io – Smart MSRA Qbank with analytics#MSRA #SJT #Professionalism #EthicalDilemmas #Candour #GMCGuidance #Documentation #Boundaries #UKDoctors #MedicalRevision #passthemsra #freemsra #msraio

This episode breaks down one of the most challenging MSRA SJT topics: consent, capacity and safeguarding in under-18s. You’ll learn how to sequence decisions legally (age → competence → PR → best interests), how to apply the Gillick and Fraser tests safely, when confidentiality must be broken, and how to avoid the classic exam traps. A clear walkthrough of the AGE-SAFE framework with high-yield scenario patterns every candidate must master. 0:00 Why youth consent is so complex00:22 Ethical tension: autonomy vs safeguarding00:55 Four legal pillars (age, competence, PR, best interests)01:25 Under-16s: Gillick competence01:55 16–17s: FLRA Section 8 adult-weight consent02:40 Gillick vs MCA – key differences03:20 Applying Fraser criteria03:55 Confidentiality limits explained clearly04:40 AGE-SAFE framework05:20 Step 1: Age, urgency, PR06:00 Step 2: Gillick assessment06:40 Step 3: Fraser 5 test07:20 Step 4: Encourage but don’t require parental involvement08:00 Step 5: Document everything robustly08:40 Mandatory safeguarding triggers09:20 Under-13 disclosures10:00 High-stakes refusals at 16–1710:40 Residual court powers11:20 Common score-killing traps12:00 Best-interest conflicts12:40 Disagreement between parents with PR13:20 Rapid-fire exam patterns14:00 Final takeaways• Always sequence: Age → Competence → PR → Best interests• Gillick competence = decision-specific, developmental• FLRA (1969) Section 8 = 16–17s can consent as adults• Fraser 5: understand advice, won’t involve parents, likely to continue sex, risk without care, best interests• Confidentiality is not absolute — safeguarding overrides consent• Under-13 sexual activity = automatic statutory referral• Always encourage parental involvement but never make it a barrier to care• Courts can override a competent minor’s refusal of life-saving careAGE-SAFE mnemonic:A – Age & urgencyG – Gillick testE – Explain Fraser/PR needsS – Safeguard & set confidentiality limitsA – Agree plan & ownershipF – Follow-upE – Enter notesFraser 5 mnemonic:Understands the adviceNo parent involvement anticipatedLikely to continue sexual activityHealth risk if not treatedBest interests overallLinks:• passthemsra.com – Complete MSRA revision, notes, mocks, flashcards• freemsra.com – Free podcasts, threads and rapid-learning guides• msra.io – Smart MSRA Qbank with analytics#MSRA #SJT #MedicalRevision #UKDoctors #MedEd #passthemsra #freemsra #msraio #GillickCompetence #FraserGuidelines #Safeguarding #YouthConsent

This episode breaks down the NHS Core20PLUS5 framework as a high-yield SJT strategy for reducing health inequalities safely and lawfully. It explains how to identify priority groups, dismantle access barriers, and measure impact using deprivation, ethnicity and PLUS-group data. A practical, exam-ready guide to equity, legality and ethical decision-making in UK clinical practice. 0:00 Why health inequalities matter00:20 Hypertension screening scenario00:40 Core20PLUS5 as NHS strategy01:05 Legal duties for equity01:40 T3 model: Target–Tailor–Track02:20 Core20 definition (IMD)02:55 Local PLUS groups03:40 Five adult clinical priorities04:20 CYP priorities overview05:00 Using data to identify gaps05:35 Stratifying by deprivation & ethnicity06:00 Tailoring: flexible appointments06:40 Community-based clinics07:10 Interpreters & AIS obligations07:45 Digital exclusion pitfalls08:20 Co-design with communities08:55 Tracking uptake & outcomes09:25 Avoiding trap answers10:00 Equity vs equality10:40 Data-blindness risks11:10 Delay trap (waiting for funding)11:40 Three key takeaways12:10 Final reflection• Target Core20 and local PLUS groups using IMD and ethnicity data• Tailor access: flexible slots, community venues, interpreters, AIS compliance• Maintain non-digital routes to avoid exclusion• Co-design services with VCSE and community connectors• Track uptake, outcomes and experience visibly by deprivation• Equity requires differential action to achieve fair outcomes• Generic or passive measures always widen gaps• Data-driven iteration is essential for improvementT3 model (Target–Tailor–Track):• Target – Identify Core20 postcodes + local PLUS groups• Tailor – Remove barriers (flexible access, interpreters, community venues, non-digital routes)• Track – Measure uptake/outcomes by deprivation & ethnicity; iterateEQUITY mnemonic:• E – Evaluate data• Q – Quantify gaps• U – Understand local PLUS priorities• I – Implement targeted adjustments• T – Tailor communication (AIS)• Y – Yield measurable improvementLinks:• passthemsra.com – Complete MSRA revision, notes, mocks, flashcards• freemsra.com – Free podcasts, threads and rapid-learning guides• msra.io – Smart MSRA Qbank with analytics#MSRA #SJT #MedicalRevision #UKDoctors #HealthInequalities #Core20PLUS5 #EquityNotEquality #PublicHealth #NHSLeadership #passthemsra #freemsra #msraio

This episode explains how to support a distressed colleague after a medication error while maintaining absolute patient safety. It covers just culture, second-victim principles, supported candour, documentation, and the full CARE STAFF framework you must apply in MSRA SJT scenarios. Clear, humane, and safety-first.0:00 The scenario and second-victim concept00:34 Why distress makes colleagues unsafe01:07 Just culture mindset01:40 System vs individual error02:20 GMC expectations on safety and respect02:55 Step 1 – Check welfare & pause duties03:40 Step 2 – Arrange safe cover + senior review04:48 Step 3 – Supported candour (not alone)06:00 NHS Resolution rules on apology06:35 Step 4 – Long-term welfare & signposting07:15 Step 5 – Log on LFPSC + PSIRF learning07:55 CARE STAFF mnemonic08:40 Three Cs: Colleague, Candour, Culture09:15 Red flags – distress, blame culture, cover-ups10:20 Key phrases for safe conversations11:00 High-risk trap responses to avoid12:05 Three ultimate takeaways12:47 Embedding the learning and final reflections• Two patients: the harmed patient and the distressed colleague• Pause duties immediately if a colleague appears unsafe• Senior-led review and structured debrief protect everyone• Supported candour → timely, honest, prepared, not punitive• Document facts, log on LFPSC, drive system actions (PSIRF)• Just culture prevents hiding errors and improves patient safety• Avoid traps: “carry on”, cover-ups, blame, unsupported apologyCARE STAFFC – Check welfareA – Arrange safe coverR – Review with seniorE – Enable supported candourS – Signpost supportT – Track actionsA – Apply just cultureF – Feedback & follow-upLinks:• passthemsra.com – Complete MSRA revision, notes, mocks, flashcards• freemsra.com – Free podcasts, threads and rapid-learning guides• msra.io – Smart MSRA Qbank with analytics#MSRA #SJT #MedicalRevision #UKDoctors #passthemsra #freemsra #msraio #JustCulture #PatientSafety #DutyOfCandour

This episode tackles a hugely exam-relevant professionalism dilemma: balancing your right to request flexible working with your duty to maintain safe staffing. It shows you exactly how to plan early, use formal processes, protect rest, escalate unsafe break patterns, avoid secrecy, and apply the BALANCE mnemonic to score highly in MSRA SJT scenarios. 0:00 Scenario: crucial family event vs unsafe staffing00:28 Why work–life balance is a safety issue01:03 GMC 2024 duties: capacity, competence, raising concerns01:40 Fatigue as a clinical risk factor02:15 Definition: sustainable workload + predictable rest02:55 Safe staffing as the overriding principle03:40 Day-one right to request flexible working04:20 Employer’s duty to justify refusals05:00 High-yield SJT sequence: plan → cover → formalise05:40 Plan early (highest-scoring action)06:10 Provide transparent, skills-matched cover06:50 Protect breaks — escalate unsafe patterns07:30 Formal pathways, documentation, auditable trail08:10 BALANCE mnemonic08:50 Scenario 1: shift swap — transparency vs secrecy09:30 Why WhatsApp swaps are governance failures10:00 Scenario 2: repeated missed breaks10:40 Escalation as a managerial duty11:10 Four classic SJT traps11:55 Presenteeism as a safety breach12:30 Rapid-fire rules for real cases13:10 Key glossary recap13:40 Final three takeaways• Early, transparent requests with skills-matched cover score highest• Safe staffing overrides personal preference — but fatigue must be escalated• Breaks are non-negotiable for error reduction• WhatsApp swaps = governance breach and immediate low score• Presenteeism counts as working while impaired• Use formal flexible-working pathways and maintain an email/audit trail• Equity matters — fairness to colleagues is part of professionalism• Avoid traps: dishonesty, secrecy, overwork heroics, refusing others unfairlyTake-home mnemonic:BALANCE — Begin planning early, Agree safe cover, Leave/rest protected, Act on risk, Note agreements, Check impact, Equity for teamLinks:• passthemsra.com – Complete MSRA revision, notes, mocks, flashcards• freemsra.com – Free podcasts, threads and rapid-learning guides• msra.io – Smart MSRA Qbank with analytics#MSRA #SJT #MedicalRevision #SafeStaffing #FlexibleWorking #GMC #Professionalism #UKDoctors #passthemsra #freemsra #msraio

This episode breaks down one of the most important MSRA SJT principles: safe consent requires equity, not equality. You’ll learn how to recognise communication barriers, arrange professional interpreters, meet Accessible Information Standard (AIS) duties, apply NICE shared-decision guidance, and avoid the tempting shortcuts that invalidate consent. A clear, high-yield walkthrough of the FIRST–NEXT–LAST structure, the Equalise mnemonic, and the Flag-IT documentation tool. 0:00 The unsafe consent dilemma00:22 Urgency vs unsafe communication00:55 Equality vs equity explained01:25 Why equal treatment leads to unsafe care01:55 GMC duties to communicate fairly02:40 AIS-5 requirements03:20 NICE NG197 shared decision-making03:55 System-level legal duties04:40 FIRST–NEXT–LAST action plan05:20 Step 1: Identify & validate barriers06:00 Step 2: Arrange immediate adjustments06:40 Why family interpreters are unsafe07:20 Proportionate delay vs unsafe speed08:00 Step 3: Teach-back for true understanding08:40 Step 4: Coordinate & safety-net09:20 Step 5: Document AIS flags visibly10:00 Equalise mnemonic10:40 Flag-IT mnemonic11:20 Red-flag traps11:55 Unsafe shortcut behaviours12:40 High-scoring principles13:20 Three final takeaways14:00 Reflection on systemic equity• Equity = removing barriers for safe consent• AIS-5: Ask → Record → Flag → Meet → Review• Professional interpreters only — family use is unsafe & invalidates consent• NICE NG197 mandates shared decision-making adjusted to literacy• Teach-back confirms real understanding, not just nods• A minor delay for safe consent is better than unsafe speed• Document communication needs clearly to ensure continuity• High-score answers focus on valid consent + systemic follow-throughEqualise mnemonic:E – Explore barriersQ – Quality informationU – Understand via teach-backA – Adjust (interpreter, format, time)L – Link servicesI – Identify & flagS – Safety-netE – EvaluateFlag-IT mnemonic:F – Flag needsL – Language/interpreterA – Access to formatsG – Guidance/decision aidsI – Interpreter & timeT – Teach-back confirmedLinks:• passthemsra.com – Complete MSRA revision, notes, mocks, flashcards• freemsra.com – Free podcasts, threads and rapid-learning guides• msra.io – Smart MSRA Qbank with analytics#MSRA #SJT #MedicalRevision #UKDoctors #MedEd #passthemsra #freemsra #msraio #Consent #Equity #AccessibleInformationStandard #NICEGuidance

When pressure is high and resources are scarce, the MSRA SJT rewards one thing above all: objective, criteria-led allocation — not convenience, noise, or hierarchy. This episode breaks down how to prioritise safely using urgency, benefit, and risk of delay, while resisting VIP pressure, unsafe delays, and opaque decision-making. Learn the FAIRE mnemonic, the “balanced scales” visual cue, and the five high-yield traps that instantly tank scores.0:00 Why resource allocation is hard00:20 The last isolation-room scenario00:58 Convenience vs fairness01:22 One-sentence exam rule: prioritise by need + benefit02:40 Why first-come-first-served scores badly03:39 The three red flags (unsafe delay, VIP pressure, opacity)04:52 The 5-step high-scoring framework06:20 Step-by-step: Prioritise → Document → Communicate → Escalate → Address inequalities07:20 FAIRE mnemonic explained08:40 NHS Core20PLUS5 and equity duties09:40 Brand-Plus model (benefits, risks, alternatives, nothing + equity)11:00 Classic imaging allocation scenario (CT PE vs chronic back pain MRI)12:40 The two dominant SJT patterns13:40 High-frequency traps in the exam15:10 Model escalation phrase16:00 FAQ: clinically equivalent cases17:10 FAQ: when to escalate18:20 Rapid-fire X→Y safety drill19:40 Final three takeaways• Highest scoring approach = urgency + expected benefit + harm if delayed.• Fairness means addressing barriers, not treating everyone identically.• VIP pressure, loud families, or hierarchy must never override clinical criteria.• Keeping resources idle “just in case” causes certain harm and scores poorly.• Documentation + transparent communication is non-negotiable.• Early escalation when capacity becomes unsafe is a professional responsibility.FAIREF – Focus on need & benefitA – Address inequalitiesI – Inform & documentR – Raise/escalate earlyE – Establish review & safety nettingBalanced Scales Visual CuePicture scales weighted only by: urgency, benefit, risk of delay — never by noise, rank, or arrival order.Resource allocation questions test your ability to stay fair, transparent and safety-focused under intense pressure. Use clearly defined criteria, resist external influence, document your rationale, and escalate when capacity becomes unsafe. The FAIRE mnemonic and the balanced-scales mental model will guide you to the safest — and highest-scoring — answers.Links:• passthemsra.com – Complete MSRA revision, notes, mocks, flashcards• freemsra.com – Free podcasts, threads and rapid-learning guides• msra.io – Smart MSRA Qbank with analytics#MSRA #SJT #ResourceAllocation #PatientSafety #GMCGuidance #ClinicalPrioritisation #Fairness #UKDoctors #MedicalRevision #passthemsra #freemsra #msraio