The Next Reel Film Podcast

“The men who own me are at last admitting their fear of me.”An AI that refuses to stay in its box is a terrifying concept in 1977—and even more so now. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we continue the Thinking Machines series with a conversation about Demon Seed. Directed by Donald Cammell, the Scottish painter-turned-filmmaker who co-directed Performance with Nicolas Roeg, the film stars Julie Christie as Susan Harris, a psychologist trapped in her own fully automated home by an AI her husband designed. Fritz Weaver plays Dr. Alex Harris, whose confidence in his creation leaves his wife dangerously exposed.We dig into how specifically this 1977 film anticipated the smart home world we live in now, what makes Proteus IV a distinctly unsettling AI villain—cold and indifferent rather than theatrical—and how the grief at the heart of the Harris marriage shapes everything the film builds toward. We also get into Donald Cammell's troubled directorial career, the Bricklin SV-1, where this film sits against Colossus: The Forbin Project in the Thinking Machines series, and whether Julie Christie's committed performance saves the second half from its own camp instincts. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Watch & Discover See Our Full Conversation on YouTube: Watch Now Watch the Film: ▸ Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd | TrailerAdapted from Demon Seed by Dean KoontzAlso in The Thinking Machines Series:Colossus: The Forbin ProjectCross-Show Recommendations: Sitting in the Dark — Home Invasion Trailer Rewind — Odd ThomasSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible

“Shall we play a game?”The technology felt real, the threat felt real, and in 1983, so did the fear. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we continue the Thinking Machines series with a conversation about "WarGames." Director John Badham's film stars Matthew Broderick as David Lightman, a teenage hacker who stumbles into something far bigger than the video game he was looking for, alongside Ally Sheedy as his classmate Jennifer and Dabney Coleman as the NORAD engineer convinced he'd solved the problem by removing humans from the equation entirely. It arrived when home computers were new, hacking wasn't yet illegal, and Cold War nuclear anxiety was at its peak.We dig into whether Joshua, or WOPR—the military supercomputer at the heart of it all—is actually the film's most complete character, what Badham's tonal rescue job after a mid-production director change accomplished, and why the real-world shockwaves from this film—Reagan's Camp David screening, the laws that followed, the hacker convention named after it—are as remarkable as anything in the story. The film is a genuinely fantastic ride; what makes this conversation fun is asking whether it's anything more than that. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🍿 Watch "WarGames": Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd 📽️ TrailerWant More?This is a member bonus episode! While we'd love your support, you'll love what membership brings: monthly bonus episodes like this one, ad-free listening, early releases, exclusive Discord channels, and voting rights on future member movies. It truly pays to be a member.Ready to join? Visit TruStory FM to learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership.

“If you obey me, you will survive.”The most frightening AI isn't the one that malfunctions—it's the one that does exactly what you asked. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we begin the Thinking Machines series with a conversation about Colossus: The Forbin Project. Directed by Joseph Sargent, the film stars Eric Braeden as Dr. Charles Forbin, the scientist who builds the world's most powerful AI defense system and locks it inside a mountain, alongside Susan Clark as his colleague Dr. Markham and Gordon Pinsent as a president cast to evoke Kennedy—and just as helpless. Based on D.F. Jones's 1966 novel and shot with real computer equipment provided by Control Data Corporation, it carries an unsettling authenticity that only sharpens the further the machines go.We dig into why the film's flat, clinical direction—initially dismissed as weak—is actually its sharpest creative choice, how Gene Polito's anamorphic widescreen photography makes humans look like ants in their own creation, and why a 1970 film about AI feels more urgent in 2026 than almost anything made recently. We also unpack Eric Braeden's controlled performance, Paul Frees's authoritative turn as the voice of Colossus, and what Nick Bostrom's AI Paperclip Maximizer thought experiment tells us about why indifference is scarier than malice. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!If You Liked This Conversation, Try These from the Next Reel Family:The Film Board: MercyCinema Scope: 1950s Science Fiction🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube!🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from Colossus by D.F. JonesSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible

“ I guess when you’re really good at escapes, you figure you can get away with anything.”“The Escape Artist” is Caleb Deschanel’s feature directorial debut—and a rare, nearly forgotten American fable about a teenage escape artist who picks the wrong pocket and ends up entangled in a corrupt mayor’s family drama. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we return to our Magicians series with a conversation about “The Escape Artist.” Griffin O’Neal plays the boy at the center, performing real sleight of hand and lockpicking trained by Ricky Jay in largely single takes—a tactile authenticity that holds the film together when the story can’t. Raúl Juliá plays the volatile son of the corrupt mayor, and both hosts agree his performance is one of the best reasons to seek this film out.We argue about whose arc actually drives the film—Danny’s quiet grief journey, or Stu’s simmering rage at a father who won’t get out of the way. We track what Deschanel’s extraordinary visual instincts bring to the director’s role and where they fall short. We talk about O’Neal’s troubled real-life backstory with dad Ryan O’Neal and how it shadows the film, the history of the Dead End Kids, and a cast full of final screen appearances. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!If You Liked This Conversation, Try These from the Next Reel Family:The Next Reel: Related Series: Magicians | Melissa MathisonCaleb Deschanel as Cinematographer: Being There | The Black Stallion | The NaturalThe Film Board: Magicians: Now You See Me | Now You See Me 2🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from The Escape Artist by David WagonerSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible

“He’s telling you who he is. Believe him.”Two childhood friends face each other across decades of silence, and only one can walk out champion. Creed III arrives as the first entry in the Rocky/Creed franchise without Sylvester Stallone's Rocky Balboa, marking Michael B. Jordan's directorial debut as he steps behind the camera while still starring as Adonis Creed. Jordan brings anime-inspired visual experimentation to the ring, using exaggerated impact shots, CG-enhanced flesh ripples, and an "ethereal realm" finale that strips away the crowd and leaves only two fighters alone in psychological space.We dig into what the franchise gains and loses by removing the mentor archetype, how Jonathan Majors delivers a transcendent performance as Damian Anderson despite off-screen controversy, and whether the film's mechanical plotting—hidden letters, engineered confrontations, a mother's stroke—earns its emotional payoff or just shortcuts the work. We argue about Jordan's anime influences: does the stylized visual language elevate the boxing realism or pull you out of it? We also unpack the unresolved subplot about Adonis' daughter and violence, Tessa Thompson's underutilized presence, and whether the locker room reconciliation works because of the performances or in spite of the script. It's a film that divides us—Pete sees a four-star movie doing five-star stuff, while Andy wishes the craft had been matched by stronger writing.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Dig Into Other Shows in Our FamilySitting in the Dark: Jonathan Majors starred in Lovecraft Country; we explored more Lovecraft adaptions hereThe Next Reel: Catch Up on our Rocky series and hear us discuss every film that led to this oneThe Film Board: Get more Ryan Coogler conversations with Sinners and Black PantherMovies We Like: Hear Creed costume designer Antoinette Messam discuss Amélie🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical TrailerSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible

“Sadly, people don’t buy lady art.”A painter's work becomes the center of a husband's fraudulent claim. We close out the True Lies series with Big Eyes, Tim Burton's biographical drama about artist Margaret Keane, whose distinctive big-eyed waif paintings were claimed by her controlling husband Walter throughout the 1950s and 60s. The story unfolds against mid-century gender dynamics, when women artists faced skepticism in the commercial art world and wives' agency within marriages was culturally constrained—context that shapes Margaret's complicity in the fraud.We argue about Burton's surprisingly bland visual approach and whether his restraint serves or undermines the material. We debate Christoph Waltz's theatrical performance choices—does he fit this grounded domestic coercion story, or is he miscast? We praise Amy Adams for carrying the film with emotional clarity even when the movie around her wavers between genuinely threatening sequences (lit matches through the keyhole) and predictable courtroom comedy. We track how the film works better as Margaret's survivor narrative than as a typical fraud story, and we explore alternative casting scenarios that might have changed the tone entirely.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical TrailerSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible

“Sometimes, it’s easier living the lie.”The most audacious con in the story isn't the forgeries—it's the autobiography. Catch Me If You Can, our second member bonus episode in our True Lies series, is Spielberg's crime comedy-drama built on a biography journalist Alan Logan has since largely debunked—which makes the film more fascinating, not less. Set in a 1960s America where a uniform commanded automatic trust, it was Spielberg's first film about a real living person, and he leaned into the parts that felt most personal: fractured families, absent fathers, and the distances between them.We dig into whose story this really is—making a strong case that it's more Spielberg's than Abagnale's—and track the father-son dynamics running through both the Frank/Frank Sr. relationship and the unlikely surrogate bond with Carl Hanratty. We also argue about what makes Christopher Walken's performance so quietly extraordinary, and why the role couldn't have landed the same way with anyone else.The formal elements get serious attention too—Janusz Kamiński's glossy cinematography, John Williams's jazz score, and the Kuntzel + Deygas opening title sequence as a Saul Bass homage that sets the film's entire register before a word of dialogue is spoken. If you've shelved Catch Me If You Can as lighter Spielberg fare, this is the conversation that earns it a second look. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!If You Want to Keep GoingThe Next ReelTom Hanks series: Pete and Andy have covered a number of films in Tom Hanks's filmography—find the full series hereMore Spielberg on The Next Reel: Browse every Spielberg film the show (and a few others) have covered hereTrue Lies series: Catch Me If You Can is part of the ongoing member bonus series on real people who lied, fabricated, or constructed false identities—explore the full series right here 🎬 Watch & Discover🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from Catch Me If You Can: The True Story of a Real Fake by Frank W. AbagnaleWant More?This is a member bonus episode! While we'd love your support, you'll love what membership brings: monthly bonus episodes like this one, ad-free listening, early releases, exclusive Discord channels, and voting rights on future member movies. It truly pays to be a member.Ready to join? Visit TruStory FM to learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership.

“We’re gonna put television on trial.”A celebrated academic steps into a television booth and discovers how easy it is to compromise. We continue the True Lies series with "Quiz Show," Robert Redford's examination of the 1950s scandal when NBC's Twenty-One was exposed for feeding contestants answers. The film captures a moment when quiz shows were pitched as inspiring educational programming while sponsors and executives rigged outcomes behind the scenes. Charles Van Doren came from an intellectual family, making his involvement particularly devastating when a lawyer begins investigating the fraud.We dig into why this is the first film in the series where we genuinely sympathize with the protagonist—Van Doren's descent feels natural rather than desperate, enabled by institutional pressure rather than need. We track the emotional core through four father-son scenes between Charles and Mark Van Doren, examining Paul Scofield's devastating wordless moments. We argue about whether the film lets Van Doren off too easily or whether that discomfort is the point, and we explore how the executives at the top are the real villains, comfortable with lying while lower-level employees take the fall. The iconic isolation booth shot with its dolly-zoom effect becomes a visual metaphor for moral pressure closing in.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from Remembering America: A Voice from the Sixties by Richard N. GoodwinSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible

“He gave me a prune. Howard Hughes gave me a prune on the beach at Nassau.”A charismatic writer spins an audacious deception at the highest levels of the publishing world. In "The Hoax," part of our True Lies series, we explore Lasse Hallström's examination of the notorious 1971 literary scandal surrounding Howard Hughes' alleged autobiography, featuring compelling performances by Richard Gere and Alfred Molina.We dig into how Gere's layered portrayal captures both Irving's magnetic confidence and psychological unraveling, while tracking the fascinating dynamics between the fraudulent author and the publishing industry's willingness to believe his elaborate lies. The film raises provocative questions about institutional complicity and self-deception, with Molina's grounded performance as Irving's research partner providing crucial moral counterweight. The way the film builds Hughes' presence without directly portraying him creates an atmospheric tension that drives the narrative forward.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from The Hoax by Clifford IrvingSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible

“Did I do something wrong? Are you mad at me?”Trust is the whole engine—until the details start to wobble. In the True Lies series, we dig into "Shattered Glass," Billy Ray’s newsroom drama about journalism under pressure and the fragile machinery of verification. Along the way, we talk about why the film’s structure can feel like it drops viewers into the “third act,” and how that choice shapes who the audience instinctively follows.We unpack what the movie shows about fact-checking workflows, where trust can quietly replace proof, and why that’s so unnerving to watch. We argue about Hayden Christensen’s performance choices (charming, off-putting, sometimes read as whiny) and why Peter Sarsgaard becomes the film’s steady source of tension. We also get into the online-vs-print friction the story carries, plus a subtle directing idea about shifting camera stability that may be working on viewers even if they don’t notice it. If you like movies where process becomes suspense, this conversation makes the craft and the discomfort click. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from the Vanity Fair article “Shattered Glass” by Buzz BissingerSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible

“I had a book on the New York Times Bestseller list. That has to count for something.”A small crime with big nerves: words, money, and trust under pressure. In True Lies, we dig into "Can You Ever Forgive Me?"—Marielle Heller’s understated character study, anchored by Melissa McCarthy and Richard E. Grant. Because it’s adapted from Lee Israel’s memoir and set inside a tiny collectibles world, the details matter: what “authentic” looks like, who gets believed, and why the hustle feels so tempting.We unpack how the film treats literary forgery as something stranger than paperwork—more like stealing voices. We argue about the push-pull between desperation and hubris, and how compulsion (drinking, stealing, self-sabotage) shapes the people at the center. We also track the craft: the process beats, the quiet tension in dealer interactions, and why the restraint either sharpens the discomfort or keeps the story at arm’s length. If you like true stories where the mess is interpersonal and the scam is built from language, this conversation is a great match.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Watch & DiscoverSee Our Full Conversation on YouTube!Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | LetterboxdOriginal Theatrical TrailerAdapted from Can You Ever Forgive Me? A Memoir of a Literary Forger by Lee IsraelIf You Liked This, Try These Other The Next Reel Episodes:Life of the Party (Guilty Pleasures series) for more comedic Melissa McCarthyHudson Hawk (Guilty Pleasures series) for more comedic Richard E. GrantThe Diary of a Teenage Girl (Coming of Age Debuts series) for more Marielle Heller Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible

“There should be a TV show about a guy who calls home one day and he's there, he answers, he's talking to himself, only he's someone else. He's somehow divided into two, and the second one of him drives away and the rest of the show is about him trying to find the guy.”Corporate deception spins out of control when an executive's cooperation with the FBI takes unexpected turns. In "The Informant!", Steven Soderbergh directs Matt Damon in a darkly comedic true story that pushes the boundaries of unreliable narration. As a member bonus episode of our True Lies series, we explore how this 2009 film uses innovative voiceover techniques and tonal shifts to keep viewers questioning every revelation.We dig deep into Soderbergh's careful visual approach to corporate environments, examining how Marvin Hamlisch's playful score creates fascinating tension with the serious subject matter. Damon's against-type performance as Mark Whitacre anchors our discussion of how the film handles complex questions about truth and perspective in whistleblower narratives. The way "The Informant!" balances its comedy with serious themes about mental health and corporate malfeasance makes it a uniquely compelling entry in Soderbergh's experimental period.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from The Informant: A True Story by Kurt EichenwaldIf You Liked This, Try These Other The Next Reel Episodes:The Next ReelOur True Lies seriesOur Oceans Franchise seriesContagion (part of our Disease Films series)The Film BoardSide EffectsMagic Mike’s Last DanceWant More?This is a member bonus episode! While we'd love your support, you'll love what membership brings: monthly bonus episodes like this one, ad-free listening, early releases, exclusive Discord channels, and voting rights on future member movies. It truly pays to be a member.Ready to join? Visit TruStory FM to learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership.

“With all my heart, I still love the man I killed!”One shot can change everything—and the shadows don’t let go. In our Bette Davis series, we dive into "The Letter," directed by William Wyler, a studio-era crime drama where a shooting sparks a legal scramble and a single letter becomes leverage. Along the way, we track how Production Code pressure and the film’s colonial framing shape what the story can show, what it chooses to tell, and how the audience is guided (or misdirected).We dig into the movie’s exposition-heavy early stretch and debate what it gains—and loses—by leaning on characters recounting events instead of playing them out on-screen. We also argue about who the film really positions as the audience’s anchor, and why the attorney’s moral pressure becomes the most compelling engine. And because it can’t be separated from the experience, we confront the film’s racist stereotypes and “yellowface” casting choices, even as we celebrate the moody black-and-white craft that makes key sequences feel electric.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd🕸️ Our Bette Davis Series📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from the play and the short story The Letter by W. Somerset Maugham📣 If You Liked This, Try…Our 1950 Best Actress Oscar Race SeriesWilliam Wyler episodesOur Film Noir SeriesDark Victory (1940 Best Picture Nominees)Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible

“She's standing on the corner like an angel in disguise, and as I look a little closer, she's got dangerous eyes.”Finding Musical Magic in 1980s DublinJohn Carney's 2016 film Sing Street continues his exploration of music's transformative power, following Once and Begin Again with a heartwarming coming-of-age story set against the backdrop of 1980s Dublin. With a modest $4 million budget, Carney crafted an authentic period piece about young love, family dynamics, and the universal language of music. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we wrap up our John Carney’s Streetwise Musicals series with a walk down Sing Street.Musical Evolution and Character GrowthPete and Andy explore how Carney masterfully balances reality and fantasy throughout the film, particularly in how our protagonist Conor (Ferdia Walsh-Peelo) develops both musically and personally. The hosts discuss how the film's musical progression mirrors Conor's journey from novice to confident performer, with each new song reflecting his growing artistic voice and emotional maturity.Period Setting and AuthenticityThe hosts delve into Carney's treatment of 1980s Dublin, noting how the film avoids typical period piece clichés while maintaining historical authenticity. They praise the natural integration of era-specific music references and fashion choices that feel organic rather than performative.Key Discussion Points:The chemistry between Conor and Raphina (Lucy Boynton)Jack Reynor's standout performance as BrendanThe evolution of the band's music and visual styleTreatment of common school drama—and other—tropesThe balance between realism and wish fulfillmentCarney's personal connection to the materialProduction and ImpactWhile discussing the film's production, Pete and Andy note how Sing Street demonstrates Carney's growth as a filmmaker, building on themes explored in his previous work while establishing its own unique identity. They examine how the budget allowed for the right balance of production value without losing the intimate feel crucial to the story.The Power of CollaborationPete particularly praises the scenes showing the collaborative songwriting process between Conor and Eamon, highlighting how these moments capture the magic of creative partnership. They discuss how these sequences bring something fresh to Carney's exploration of musical collaboration while maintaining his signature intimate style.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical TrailerSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next Reel Film PodcastSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Letterboxd Pro/Patron discount | Audible

“And you have cursed me when there’s no one left to blame, and I have loved you just the same.”John Carney follows Once with a bigger, slicker New York music story in Begin Again—and Pete Wright and Andy Nelson can feel the tension. They talk about what changes when you swap Dublin’s scrappy intimacy for a polished production with Mark Ruffalo and Keira Knightley at the center, and how the film keeps circling the question of “authenticity” in both music and life.Highlights include the standout “phantom instruments” sequence (a perfect snapshot of Dan’s gift for hearing potential), the movie’s push-pull between art and business (including the “buck a book” showdown), and the way the film’s structure quietly reveals whose story it really is. Plus: Catherine Keener’s impact in limited screen time, the film’s complicated relationship with New York “texture,” and why the soundtrack choice becomes one of Pete’s biggest quibbles. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins.🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical TrailerSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next Reel Film PodcastSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Letterboxd Pro/Patron discount | Audible

“I don’t know you but I want you.”From Street Busker to Global Sensation: The Making of OnceJohn Carney's micro-budget musical Once (2007) emerged from Dublin's streets with a mere €112,000 budget to become an international phenomenon. Starring musicians Glen Hansard and Markéta Irglová, this intimate story of two struggling artists creating music together captured hearts worldwide and launched Carney's signature style of grounded musical storytelling. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we kick off the John Carney's Streetwise Musicals series with a conversation about Once.The Magic of Musical CreationPete and Andy explore how Once captures the authentic experience of musicians collaborating, particularly highlighting the pivotal scene in Walton's Music Shop where Guy and Girl first perform together. They discuss how Carney's background as a musician himself informed the natural, documentary-style approach to filming musical performances.Performance vs. ActingThe hosts delve into the unique challenges and benefits of casting musicians rather than actors, examining how Hansard and Irglová's real musical chemistry translated to screen chemistry. They particularly note how their inexperience as actors actually enhanced the film's authenticity.Key Discussion Points:The significance of Guy's battle-worn Takamine guitar and its role in character developmentHow the film handles the complex relationship between Guy and Girl without falling into typical romantic tropesThe impact of shooting guerrilla-style on Dublin's streetsThe film's remarkable journey from Sundance to Oscar successThe creative decision to leave the main characters unnamedTechnical and Creative ElementsThe conversation explores how the film's technical limitations—including its use of standard video cameras and minimal equipment—contributed to its intimate feel. They discuss how Carney's direction allowed for natural moments to unfold, particularly in street performances where real pedestrians became unwitting extras.Musical Impact and LegacyPete and Andy examine how Once influenced subsequent music-driven films and launched successful careers for both its leads and director. They discuss the film's eventual adaptation into a Tony-winning Broadway musical and its enduring impact on how movies portray the process of creating music.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical TrailerSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next Reel Film PodcastSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Letterboxd Pro/Patron discount | Audible

“You're very sharp Mr. Fabian. You've done a very sharp thing. Maybe even sharp enough to cut your throat.”Noir in London: Wrestling with Fate in Night and the CityJules Dassin's 1950 film noir Night and the City follows small-time hustler Harry Fabian (Richard Widmark) through the seedy underbelly of post-war London. Forced to relocate to Britain due to Hollywood blacklisting, Dassin crafted this tale of desperate ambition and inevitable doom. The film features Gene Tierney as Mary, Harry's long-suffering girlfriend, and Herbert Lom as the ruthless wrestling promoter Kristo. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we continue the Film Noir series with a conversation about Night and the City.Wrestling with AmbitionPete and Andy explore how Harry's ill-fated venture into wrestling promotion exemplifies his pattern of backing the wrong horse. They discuss the fascinating contrast between classical Greco-Roman wrestling, championed by Gregorius the Great, and the more theatrical style that would eventually dominate the sport. Andy sees potential success in Harry's plan, while Pete views it as yet another doomed venture.American Exodus in LondonThe hosts debate the unusual concentration of American characters in London, with Andy questioning the credibility of so many expatriates clustering together. They examine how this aspect might reflect both the film's production circumstances and broader themes of displacement and alienation.Key Discussion Points:The dual versions: American vs. British cuts and their differing endingsHelen's complex role as a noir femme fatale and her tragic arcThe film's relentless bleakness and inevitability of Harry's doomThe authenticity of the wrestling scenes and their symbolic significancePhil's surprising depth as a character and his tragic endCharacter and ConsequencePete and Andy delve into Mary's role as the moral center of the film, contrasting her pure intentions with Helen's calculating nature. They examine how every character, from the beggar king to the passport forger, operates within a system that values money above community. Both hosts praise Dassin's direction and Widmark's compelling performance as Harry, a man whose ambition proves terminal.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from Night and the City by Gerald KershSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next Reel Film PodcastSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Letterboxd Pro/Patron discount | Audible

“They say that fate is in the stars, that each of our years is planned ahead and nothing can change destiny. Is that true?”A Noir Holiday Tale of Second ChancesRepeat Performance, directed by Alfred L. Werker, blends film noir sensibilities with supernatural elements in this unique story about second chances. Released through poverty row studio Eagle-Lion Films in 1947, this adaptation of William O'Farrell's 1942 novel features Joan Leslie as Sheila Page, an actress who gets the opportunity to relive the previous year after shooting her husband on New Year's Eve. The film, lost for decades until its restoration in 2011, offers a fascinating exploration of fate and determinism within its noir framework. As a special holiday gift, we're making this member bonus episode available to everyone. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we return to both our Film Noir & Holiday series with a conversation about Repeat Performance.Destiny's Stubborn DesignPete and Andy dive deep into how the film handles its fantastical premise, praising the bold choice to simply have William Williams disappear on the stairs rather than using more conventional devices. They explore how Joan Leslie's performance carries the confusion and determination of someone trying to outmaneuver fate, while debating whether Lewis Hayward's portrayal of Barney hits the right notes of mounting instability.The Noir QuestionThe hosts engage in a thoughtful discussion about genre classification, both taking generous views of what constitutes film noir while acknowledging the film's unique position as a noir-fantasy hybrid. They examine how the film's fatalistic themes and visual style support its noir credentials despite its supernatural elements.Key Discussion Points:The fascinating gender swap from the source novel and its implicationsRichard Basehart's compelling (and coded?) portrayal of William WilliamsThe film's restoration history and its impact on its availabilityThe effectiveness of the year-long timeline versus a more compressed timeframe like in Groundhog DayVirginia Field's role as Paula and the film's approach to female charactersThe significance of destiny as both theme and plot deviceCultural Context and ImpactThe conversation touches on Joan Leslie's career trajectory and her legal battle with Warner Brothers, providing important context for her appearance in this independent production. They also discuss composer George Antheil's fascinating connection to Hedy Lamarr.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🍿 Watch the Film: Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Watch a Clip📚 Adapted from Repeat Performance by William O'FarrellWant More?This is a member bonus episode that we’re gifting to everyone! While we'd love your support, you'll love what membership brings: monthly bonus episodes like this one, ad-free listening, early releases, exclusive Discord channels, and voting rights on future member movies. It truly pays to be a member.Ready to join? Visit TruStory FM to learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership.

Cast your vote for The Next Reel as Best TV & Film Podcast today!“I’ve found it! I’ve found it! A Mountain of Gold.”A Tale of Survival and Comedy: The Gold Rush Climbs to New HeightsIn 1925, Charlie Chaplin transformed the harsh realities of the Klondike Gold Rush and the tragic Donner Party saga into what would become one of silent cinema's greatest achievements. Through United Artists, Chaplin crafted The Gold Rush as a masterful blend of physical comedy and social commentary. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we wrap up our Cinema Centennial: 1925's Pioneering Visions series with a conversation about The Gold Rush.A Complex Tale of Love and SurvivalPete and Andy explore how Chaplin's own impoverished childhood influenced the film's darker themes of starvation and social isolation. They discuss the controversial Georgia storyline, with Pete expressing particular frustration with the character's treatment of Chaplin's Lone Prospector.Technical Innovation and Visual EffectsThe conversation highlights cinematographer Roland Totheroh's groundbreaking effects work, particularly the innovative double exposure process. The hosts examine how these technical achievements influenced future filmmakers and discuss the famous rotating cabin sequence.Key discussion points include:The iconic roll dance sequence and its cultural legacyComparisons between Chaplin and Buster Keaton's distinct comedic approachesThe 1942 re-release's significant story changesThe film's connection to Chaplin's personal historyMack Swain's memorable performance as Big Jim McKayThe controversial aspects of Chaplin's personal life, including his marriage to Lita GreyLegacy and ImpactPete and Andy reflect on how The Gold Rush represents a pivotal moment in cinema history, marking the transition between pure slapstick and more emotionally complex storytelling. They discuss the film's enduring influence and its place in Chaplin's artistic legacy.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Centennial 4K Theatrical TrailerSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next Reel Film PodcastSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Letterboxd Pro/Patron discount | Audible

Cast your vote for The Next Reel as Best TV & Film Podcast today!“Your grandfather has left you the sum of seven million dollars. Providing --- you are married by seven o’clock on the evening of your twenty seventh birthday.”Running for Love and Legacy: Revisiting Seven ChancesSeven Chances (1925) stands as one of silent cinema’s most inventive romantic comedies—a perfect blend of physical precision, deadpan humor, and daring spectacle. Directed by Buster Keaton, this short feature follows the frantic day of a man who must marry by 7 p.m. to claim a fortune. Originally based on a Broadway play, the project wasn’t one Keaton sought out—it began as a studio assignment before he transformed it into one of his defining works. With its 57-minute runtime, silent slapstick brilliance, and inventive chase cinematography, Seven Chances shows why Keaton remains a cornerstone of early American filmmaking. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we continue the Cinema Centennial: 1925’s Pioneering Visions series with a conversation about Seven Chances.The Setup: From Studio Assignment to Keaton MasterpieceIn this episode, Pete and Andy explore how Seven Chances—a 1925 romantic comedy produced by Joseph Schenck and distributed by Metro-Goldwyn—evolved from a “sappy farce” into one of Keaton’s most memorable physical comedies. The hosts discuss Keaton’s initial reluctance, his eventual takeover after the original director quit, and the creative accident that produced the film’s iconic boulder sequence. Through Seven Chances, the duo highlights Keaton’s ability to blend danger, grace, and architectural precision into silent-era storytelling.Deadpan Genius and Dangerous Comedy: What Pete and Andy Saw in Seven ChancesBoth hosts unpack how Buster Keaton’s trademark stillness—his "Great Stone Face"—contrasts with the high-energy chaos of the final chase. Andy praises Keaton’s “human metronome” cameraman Elgin Lessley, whose perfect timing allowed Keaton’s stunts to land safely (most of the time). Pete connects Keaton’s physical comedy lineage to Jackie Chan and Tom Cruise, noting that Seven Chances feels like a forebear of the modern action-comedy.They also dive into the film’s uncomfortable historical elements—its dated racial caricatures and blackface performance—and how these moments complicate contemporary appreciation. Both agree that beyond its problematic era markers, the film’s inventive cinematography and physical storytelling remain stunningly modern.Additional Topics Covered:The inheritance clause as a farcical critique of class and marriageParallels between Seven Chances and modern films like The Bachelor (1999) and Brewster’s MillionsKeaton’s signature underacting compared with Chaplin’s heightened emotionSilent-era stunt safety—or lack thereof—and its evolution into modern production rulesThe striking use of early two-color Technicolor in the opening sequenceExtraordinary precision in the climactic “bride chase” and boulder avalanche sequenceHow Seven Chances bridges slapstick, satire, and proto-action filmmakingThe Verdict: A Fast, Funny, and Fearless ClassicIn their wrap-up, Pete and Andy agree that while Seven Chances is not Keaton’s most personal film, it’s an impressive showcase of his timing, ingenuity, and comedic rhythm. They celebrate its tight runtime, luminous restoration, and enduring joy—qualities that make it a strong entry in their ongoing exploration of 1925’s defining cinematic landmarks.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🎭 The International Buster Keaton Society🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from Seven Chances by Roi Cooper MegrueSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next Reel Film PodcastSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Letterboxd Pro/Patron discount | Audible