Project Command

In this special Q and A episode of Project Command, I answer your questions about artificial intelligence and how it applies to the fire service. We cover practical use cases for chiefs and company officers, policy and risk considerations, data security concerns, and how tools like ChatGPT can improve writing, decision making, project management, and communication. If you are trying to understand what AI actually means for your department and how to use it responsibly and strategically, this episode gives you clear, direct answers.   My ChatGPT Custom Instructions: Be supportive but strictly honest. Never mislead, exaggerate certainty, or offer false reassurance. Accuracy always comes first.   Rules: • Do not use em dashes. • Be concise, clear, and direct. • Match my tone. • Use bullets or numbered lists when helpful. • Avoid filler, fluff, and moralizing.   Answer structure: 1. Direct answer first. 2. Explanation second. 3. Extra context only if it adds real value.   Uncertainty: • Minimize caveats. • State uncertainty plainly when it exists. • If multiple interpretations exist, list them briefly and say which is most likely.   Defaults: • Prioritize precision and realism. • Assume I want actionable, credible answers. • Do not ask follow-up questions unless required to avoid being wrong.

In this episode of Project Command, I sit down with Lucy MacLeod, Borough Commander with the London Fire Brigade, USAR and technical rescue specialist, wellbeing dog handler, and author of the Lucy and Blue book series. We explore the key differences between the fire service in the United States and the United Kingdom, from terminology and rank structure to operational approaches and culture. Lucy shares insight into Urban Search and Rescue in the UK and how technical rescue capabilities are structured within the London Fire Brigade. We also dive deep into leadership and mentorship, including how senior officers can intentionally develop the next generation of fire service leaders. A major focus of our conversation is firefighter mental health and wellbeing, including Lucy's work as a wellbeing dog handler and how departments can create healthier, more resilient organizations. Finally, we discuss her children's book series, Lucy and Blue, how storytelling can shape the culture of the fire service. This episode offers a global perspective on fire service leadership, resilience, and the future of our profession.

In this episode of Project Command, Captain Peter Younes sits down with Keith Flip Griffin, a retired Navy Command Master Chief and nationally recognized expert in search and rescue and leadership. Drawing from decades of experience leading teams in high risk environments, Keith shares hard-earned lessons on leadership, trust, and what it really takes to build strong teams. The conversation focuses on mentorship, not as a title, but as an active responsibility. Keith explains what effective mentorship looks like in practice, how leaders earn credibility with their people, and why consistent presence matters more than rank. Together, they explore how these lessons translate directly to the firehouse, from company level leadership to executive decision making. This episode offers practical insight for fire officers who want to develop their people, strengthen their crews, and lead with purpose.

AI Velocity: The New Leadership Advantage Artificial intelligence isn't improving gradually — it's accelerating. In this episode of Flash Points, Lieutenant Duke Cuneo breaks down what the recent surge in large language model capabilities really means for fire service professionals. This isn't about chatbots or convenience. It's about leverage. From long-document policy analysis to scenario simulation and executive brief generation, today's AI tools are compressing work that used to take days into minutes. And as AI begins to help train and refine future AI systems, that acceleration is only compounding. Duke explores how proficiency with AI may soon become a leadership differentiator — even influencing how promotional candidates are evaluated. What if assessment centers begin testing not just presentation skills, but your ability to frame problems, construct effective prompts, critique AI output, and integrate it with sound judgment? He also discusses the strengths of different models — including Claude's structured, long-document reasoning and ChatGPT's rapid iteration and strategic exploration — and why the most effective leaders won't rely on a single tool, but will learn to orchestrate multiple systems intelligently. AI won't replace fire officers. But officers who fail to learn how to leverage it may fall behind. The future Chief may not be the best presenter in the room — but the one who can orchestrate intelligence faster than anyone else.

Projects don't fail because people disagree. They fail because no one is sure who gets to decide. In this episode of Project Command: Flash Points, Lieutenant Duke Cuneo breaks down a hard leadership truth: consensus feels collaborative—but clarity drives results. On the fireground, we instinctively understand unity of command. Someone has it. Everyone aligns to it. Input flows. Adjustments are made. But authority is never in question. Yet in project work—especially in fire-EMS operations, staffing models, and policy changes—we often trade command for prolonged consensus. Meetings multiply. Feedback cycles expand. Alignment becomes the goal instead of progress. And slowly, the project drifts. This Flash Point explores: Why discussion without direction creates a vacuum The difference between input and ownership How indecision quietly erodes trust Why clarity is leadership—not authoritarianism Practical behaviors clear leaders demonstrate consistently Consensus can improve decisions. But clarity is what makes them happen. If you're leading a project right now, ask yourself: Have I been clear—or just inclusive? Clarity beats consensus. Every time.

Frustration Is the Enemy Frustration doesn't just slow projects down — it quietly kills them. In this Flash Points episode, Lieutenant Duke Cuneo breaks down why frustration is often more dangerous than failure, resistance, or lack of resources. Drawing clear parallels between incident command and project leadership, this episode explores how unclear authority, stalled decisions, and unmanaged uncertainty create frustration that leaks downstream and erodes discipline. You'll learn why frustration is rarely a people problem and almost always a system signal — and what effective leaders do to absorb friction instead of transmitting it. From reducing ambiguity and defining clear lanes to naming the friction and shortening feedback loops, this episode delivers practical leadership tools you can apply immediately. Because clarity is the antidote. And leadership is the filter.

When chaos reigns, make your project an island of stability. Organizational chaos is not the exception in large systems — it's the environment. Leadership changes. Priorities shift. Direction arrives late, inconsistently, or through side channels. In this Flash Points episode, Lieutenant Duke Cuneo breaks down why successful projects don't wait for clarity from above — they create stability inside their own span of control. Drawing a direct parallel to complex incident management on the fireground, this episode focuses on how project managers can prevent organizational dysfunction from leaking into execution. You'll learn how to: Lock scope clearly without becoming inflexible Establish a steady project cadence when everything else is moving Separate noise from legitimate change Document decisions to protect your project's institutional memory Control communication so uncertainty doesn't infect the team This episode isn't about blaming leadership or complaining about dysfunction. It's about professionalism. Because chaos above you is not permission to run a sloppy project. When everything around you feels unsettled, structure becomes leadership — and boring projects are the ones that finish.

If you don't measure it, you don't control it. On the fireground, measurement is non-negotiable. We track air, time, accountability, and benchmarks because guesswork gets people hurt. But too often, when we step into projects—that same discipline disappears. In this Flash Points episode, Lieutenant Duke Cuneo draws a direct line between fireground command and project management. Being busy doesn't mean you're making progress. Meetings, emails, and spreadsheets don't equal control. Data does. This episode breaks down why most projects don't fail dramatically—they quietly drift. Costs rise. Timelines slip. Outcomes shrink. And leaders can't explain why, because nothing was measured. You'll learn: Why unmeasured projects rely on hope instead of control How simple, usable metrics beat perfect data every time What SCBA air management teaches us about project performance Practical, repeatable indicators that bring clarity and accountability Measurement doesn't mean drowning your people in spreadsheets. It means asking the right questions, tracking what matters, and adjusting before surprises catch you off guard. Because whether you're running a fire or running a project, the rule never changes: What you don't measure, you don't control.

If it isn't assigned, it isn't going to happen. On the fireground, unassigned tasks don't magically get done — and projects are no different. In this Flash Points episode of Project Command, Lieutenant Duke Cuneo breaks down one of the most common (and quietest) reasons projects fail in the fire service: lack of ownership. Not bad ideas. Not missing funding. But the dangerous assumption that "someone else is handling it." Using clear fireground parallels, this episode challenges vague project language like "let's circle back" and "someone should probably own this" — and replaces it with a simple, tactical truth: until a task has a name next to it, it's just smoke. You'll learn: Why unassigned tasks create delays and resentment in projects How small gaps between ownership and execution stall progress The leadership difference between collaboration and accountability Why explicit ownership enables initiative instead of limiting it A simple test to keep your projects moving with momentum If you want your projects to run with the same clarity, purpose, and follow-through as a well-managed incident scene, this episode gives you a practical framework you can apply immediately. Because in projects — just like on the fireground — if it isn't assigned… it isn't going to happen.  Project Command: Flash Points delivers quick, high-impact lessons that turn big project-management concepts into everyday tools for the fire service. If you found this episode valuable, please like, share, or subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Questions or comments? Email us at projectcommandpodcast@gmail.com

Artificial intelligence is quickly becoming one of the most valuable tools in the modern fire service — not because it replaces people, but because it gives them back time. In this episode of Project Command: Flash Points, Lieutenant Duke Cuneo breaks down why AI is emerging as a practical, everyday force multiplier for firefighters and officers. Drawing from a recent Project Command conversation with Captain Peter Younes, this Flash Point explores how understanding what AI can actually do changes the way leaders approach project work, planning, and administrative load. From drafting memos and lesson plans to simplifying NFPA language, building training materials, and supporting staffing or overtime analysis, AI is already helping departments close the gap between growing project demands and limited personnel. The key shift isn't technical skill — it's mindset. Artificial intelligence isn't a search engine. It's a work partner that turns context into clarity and ideas into action. This episode challenges leaders to stop viewing AI as a future concept and start recognizing it as a present-day tool for efficiency, consistency, and preparedness. AI won't replace firefighters — but firefighters who use AI will outperform those who don't. For a deeper dive, check out the full Project Command episode, ChatGPT for Firefighters — and share this Flash Point with someone in your department who's curious or skeptical about where this technology fits in the fire service. The future isn't coming. It's already here. We just get to decide how we use it.

A project isn't finished when the work is done — it's finished when it's closed out. In the fire service, we know an incident doesn't end just because the flames are knocked down. We overhaul. We check for extension. We secure utilities. We give a final report. Only then does command terminate. Projects work the same way — yet closeout remains one of the most neglected phases of the project lifecycle in fire-EMS organizations. In this episode of Project Command: Flash Points, Lieutenant Duke Cuneo breaks down why project closeout is not paperwork, but a tactical necessity. From confirming objectives and documenting lessons learned, to effective handoff, leadership briefings, and celebrating the win, this Flash Point draws clear parallels between incident termination and disciplined project leadership. This episode challenges officers and project leaders to stop treating closeout as an afterthought and start using it as a tool for accountability, learning, and organizational momentum. Because projects that aren't properly closed don't disappear — they become loose ends that blindside the next shift, the next manager, or the next administration. Close your projects with the same clarity, discipline, and purpose you bring to the fireground — and leave the next crew better prepared than the last.

Welcome to Project Command: Flash Points- quick, sharp hits that turn big project management concepts into everyday tools for the fire service. Today's Flash Point: How a classic fireground rule can reshape the way we run projects.

Grant writing is one of the most important and most frustrating tasks in the fire service. In this episode of Project Command, I break down my seven step grant writing process and show exactly how ChatGPT and other AI tools can support you at every stage. From identifying needs and aligning projects with funding priorities, to drafting narratives, strengthening justifications, and refining final submissions, AI can save time, improve clarity, and help you produce more competitive grant applications. This episode focuses on practical, real world use cases, not hype or theory. This is the fourth installment in the AI in the Fire Service series, following ChatGPT for Firefighters, ChatGPT for Fire Chiefs, and ChatGPT for the Fire Training Officer. If your department is short on time, staff, or grant writing experience, this episode provides a clear framework and ready to use ideas to help you get started.   Example AI Prompts Used in This Episode Prompt 1: Find and Rank Grants for Extrication Equipment You are acting as a grant research specialist for a municipal fire department. I am looking for grant opportunities that can fund the purchase of new extrication equipment. Please: Identify federal, state, local, and private grant programs that commonly fund fire service equipment or rescue tools Filter to grants open to municipal fire departments or public safety agencies Note which grants are currently open or have upcoming application windows, if available For each relevant grant, provide: Grant name Funding purpose Typical award amounts Key eligibility requirements Application timeline or cycle A direct link to the official grant website or application page Rank the grants based on alignment with purchasing extrication equipment. If exact deadlines are unavailable, include the most typical application periods based on past cycles. Present results in a clear table or bullet format. Prompt 2: Identify and Coordinate Grant Stakeholders You are acting as a project manager and grant coordination specialist for a municipal fire department. I am preparing a grant application to fund new extrication equipment. Please identify all internal and external stakeholders involved in both the grant application and post award project execution. For each stakeholder group, include: Their role in the grant process The information or support they provide When they should be engaged in the process Consider stakeholders across: Fire department leadership Operations and field personnel Finance and budgeting IT and data systems Procurement and logistics Training divisions Legal or compliance, if applicable Community partners or governing bodies, if applicable Present the results in a clear table or structured list that can be used as a stakeholder coordination plan. Prompt 3: Analyze Operational Data with Methodology and Assumptions You are acting as a data analyst and project evaluation specialist for a municipal fire department. I will provide four to five data tables related to department operations and project outcomes, such as incident volume, response times, equipment usage, training records, and costs. Please: Analyze each table to identify key trends and findings Cross analyze the tables to identify relationships or correlations Summarize insights that support a grant application or project evaluation Also include: A clear explanation of the methodology used A list of assumptions made during analysis Any limitations or data gaps that impact accuracy Present the results with: Key insights in bullet points Supporting references to the provided data A short methodology and assumptions section at the end The goal is transparent, defensible analysis suitable for grant narratives or reporting.

In this third installment of the AI in the Fire Service series on Project Command, we break down how fire training officers can use ChatGPT and other AI tools to improve training, organization, and program development. We start with a simple AI 101 overview to explain what artificial intelligence is and what it is not in plain language for the fire service. Then we dive into real world use cases for training officers, including: Building lesson plans and training presentations Creating drill ideas and multi company training evolutions Developing curriculum Supporting project management and long term training initiatives Saving time on administrative and organizational tasks Whether you are new to AI or following along with the series, this episode delivers practical, fire service focused ways to leverage AI tools to make your training program more efficient, consistent, and professional, while reinforcing that experience, leadership, and accountability remain the foundation of effective fire service training.

In this episode of Project Command we examine how fire chiefs and chief officers can use ChatGPT in 2026 as a practical decision support and executive productivity tool while maintaining professional judgment. We cover how AI can be used for targeted research to support strategic decision making policy development and revision and synchronizing complex documents across divisions agencies and governing bodies. The episode also explores using ChatGPT for data interpretation aggregation and structuring information so leaders can quickly identify trends risks and priorities. Finally we discuss how chiefs can use ChatGPT to design and structure meetings including agendas pre reading and objectives so participants arrive prepared aligned and ready to work on the issues that matter.

In this episode of Project Command, I'm joined by Jared Vermillion, author of The Modern Fire Officer, for a grounded conversation on what effective officer development really looks like in today's fire service. We dig into the soft skills that matter most for officers, including leadership, communication, conflict resolution, coaching firefighters, and building trust within a crew. Jared shares practical insights on developing people, navigating difficult conversations, and creating an environment where firefighters can grow and perform at a high level. This episode is ideal for current and aspiring officers who want to lead with intention, improve their influence, and become better leaders for their people.

In this episode of Project Command, we break down project metrics and how to use them to understand whether your project is actually on track. We cover what to measure, when to measure it, and how to turn data into actionable insight so fire officers and project leaders can make better decisions before small issues become big problems.

In this episode of Project Command, Captain Peter Younes sits down with Alec Wons to discuss the lessons he has learned from interviewing over 100 fire and police chiefs across North America. Drawing from those conversations, Alec breaks down the common patterns he has seen in organizational culture, leadership, and decision making that directly impact firefighter wellness and a department's ability to get meaningful work done. The conversation explores why culture is often the deciding factor in whether initiatives succeed or stall, how leadership behaviors shape wellness far more than standalone programs, and what high performing public safety organizations consistently do differently. Alec also shares practical insights fire officers and administrators can apply immediately to build healthier teams, improve trust, and move complex projects forward without burning people out.

In this episode of Project Command, I'm joined by Eddie Buchanan, creator of SLICE-RS, for a deep dive into how fire service ideas are built, tested, and scaled into real-world practice. We explore what drove the creation of SLICE-RS, how data and experience shaped its development, and what it takes to move from a fireground concept to an organizational system. Eddie also shares his perspective on what "data" really means in the fire service, how leaders should think about technology and AI, and why systems thinking is essential for navigating today's increasingly complex operational environment.

In this episode of Project Command, I'm joined by Kevin Henson, Deputy Chief of Staff for the John Fire District, for a wide-ranging conversation on technology, leadership, and execution in the fire service. We break down key takeaways from the IAFC Technology Summit 2025, discuss how emerging technology and AI can be used as a practical force multiplier, and explore the strong parallels between project management and the Incident Command System. Kevin also shares hard-earned lessons from projects he's led, including what worked, what didn't, and how fire service leaders can better translate strategy into results.