Claim OwnershipSupreme Court Opinions Read
Subscribed: 0Played: 0
Subscribe
© Supreme Court Opinions Read
Description
It's exactly what it says on the tin. I read Supreme Court opinions so you don't have to. This channel is not affiliated with the Supreme Court of the United States in any way.
24 Episodes
Reverse
In episode 23 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Berk v Choy. At issue in this case, whether Delaware's requirement that plaintiffs in medical malpractice suits submit expert affidavits of merit applies in federal court or is inconsistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-440_1b82.pdfLinktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 22 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Ellinburg v United States. At issue in this case, whether the MVRA's restitution obligations are criminal punishments for purposed of the Ex Post Facto Clauses of the Constitution. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-482_d1oe.pdfLinktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 21 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited v Burton. At issue in this case, whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c)(1)'s requirement that Rule 60(b) motions be brought in a reasonable time apply to motions seeking relief from allegedly void judgements. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-808_lkgn.pdfLInktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 20 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Barrett v United States. At issue in this case, whether a defendant can be convicted for the same offense under both Section 924(c)(1)(A)(i) and Section 924(j) under Blockburger v United States. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-5774new_f20h.pdfLInktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 19 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Case v Montana. At issue in this case, whether police may enter a home without a warrant based on an objectively reasonable basis to believe it is necessary to provide emergency aid or prevent imminent injury or if the Fourth Amendment requires they have probable cause for said belief. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-624_b07d.pdfLinktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 18 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Bost v Illinois State Board Of Elections. At issue in this case, whether political candidates have standing to challenge rules governing the counting of votes in their elections.Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-568new_4gcj.pdfLinktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 17 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Bowe v United States. There are two issues in this case:(1) Whether Section 2255(h)'s cross-reference to Section 2244 includes Section 2244(b)(3)(E), thereby barring the Supreme Court from exercising certiori jurisdiction over federal prisoners' petitions for authorization to file second or successve petitions for postconviction relief.(2) Whether the same cross-reference includes Section 2244(b)(1), thereby barring federal prisoners' petitions for postconviction relief if they raise claims raised in previous petitions.Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-5438_o7kq.pdfLinktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 12 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Doe v Dynamic Physical Therapy. At issue in this case, whether Louisiana courts erred in applying a state immunity statute to bar a federal claim.Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-180_8m59.pdfLinktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 11 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Clark v Sweeny. At issue in this case, whether the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit violated the principle of party presentation by ordering a new trial on the basis of a different claim than the one brought before it. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-52_4gd5.pdfLinktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 10 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Pitts v Mississippi. At issue in this case, whether Mississippi violated a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to face a child witness by failing to make case-specific determinations of necessity before placing a barrier between him and the witness. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1159_k536.pdfLinktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 16 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Dewberry Group Inc v Dewberry Engineers Inc. At issue in this case, whether courts can treat corporate affiliates as one corporate entity for calculating a defendant's profits under the Lanham Act. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r15_dc8f.pdfLinktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 15 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Waetzig v Halliburton Energy Services Inc. At issue in this case, whether a voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Prodecure 41(a) counts as a "final proceeding" under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r14_6kg7.pdfLInktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 14 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Glossip v Oklahoma. At issue in this case, whether the state of Oklahoma violated Richard Glossip's 14th Amendment rights by knowingly allowing false testimony to stand at trial, in violation of Napue v Illinois, and the proper remedy if so. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r13_c0n2.pdfLinktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 13 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Lackey v Stinnie. At issue in this case, the meaning of the phrase "prevailing party" in Section 1988, a fee shifting statute.Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r12_8njq.pdfLinktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 9 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Williams v Reed. At issue in this case, whether a state's administrative process exhaustion requirement barring Section 1983 claims challenging unlawful delays to the same administrative process violates federal law. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r11_2b8e.pdfLinkree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 8 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Wisconsin Bell Inc. v United States ex rel. Heath. At issue in this case, whether a request for reimbursement from the Universal Service Fund constitutes a "claim" under the False Claims Act.Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r10_mlio.pdfLinkree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 7 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Republic of Hungary v Simon. At issue in this case, whether alleging expropriated money was commingled with unrelated money in an account, which was then used for commercial acctivity in the United States is sufficient to satisfy the commercial nexus requirement in the FSIA's expropriation exception to foreign sovereign immunity.Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r09_1b7d.pdfLinkree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 6 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Andrew v White. At issue in this case, whether it is clearly established in federal law, for purposes of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, that the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment prohibits introduction of irrelevant evidence at trial that is so prejudicial as to render the trial fundamentally unfair. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r08_db8e.pdfLinktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 5 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the opinion in TikTok Inc. v Garland. At issue in this case, whether a law (colloquially referred to as the "TikTok ban") conditioning US operations of the TikTok platform on qualified divestiture by its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, violates the First Amendment. The challenge was brought by both TikTok Inc. and a number of US TikTok users. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r07_k536.pdfLinktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
In episode 4 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in EMD Sales Inc. v Carrera. At issue in this case, the appropriate standard of proof for proving exemptions to the Fair Labor Standards Act. Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r06_5ifl.pdfLinktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread
Comments
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
United States