Claim OwnershipThe HCL Review Podcast
Subscribed: 0Played: 1
Subscribe
© Copyright 2024 All rights reserved.
Description
Want to listen to your favorite HCL Review article on the go?! We’ve got you covered! Catch all of your favorites right here in your podcast feed!
813 Episodes
Reverse
A randomized field experiment with 316 employees across 42 teams shows that grounded GenAI—AI systems customized with firm knowledge—significantly increases employees' centrality in collaboration and knowledge-sharing networks while boosting productivity and satisfaction. Specialists become more sought-after knowledge hubs, whereas generalists gain larger productivity improvements, revealing heterogeneous, role-dependent effects.The study reframes AI adoption as organizational design: deploy grounded AI as collaboration infrastructure, provide role-specific training, manage network overload, and align performance systems to reward knowledge-sharing as well as output to sustain long-term value.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
This systematic review of 64 studies shows that shift work—especially night shifts—occupational stress, and prolonged working hours reliably impair attention, memory, executive function, and processing speed via circadian disruption, sleep loss, and stress-related neurophysiology.Evidence for sedentary work is mixed. Practical recommendations include optimizing shift schedules, limiting consecutive nights and long hours, reducing job stress through redesign and resources, and embedding recovery practices to protect cognitive health during working years and beyond.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
This episode examines the surge of AI-justified layoffs and argues that managerial short-termism—not technology alone—is driving premature workforce cuts that erode demand and organizational capacity.Drawing on history and economic theory, it proposes a pragmatic policy path: graduated reductions in the standard workweek, income protections, and employer incentives to preserve employment and translate AI gains into broadly shared prosperity.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
This episode explores how compassion—recognizing, empathizing with, and responding to suffering—shapes employee wellbeing and organizational performance. It reviews evidence on the costs of compassion deficits (stress, burnout, disengagement) and the benefits of supportive cultures.Practical, evidence-based responses are presented: leadership development, psychological safety, team practices, flexible policies, and systems to prevent compassion fatigue. The episode concludes that integrating compassion into strategy and governance creates sustainable workplaces where people and performance thrive.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Human-centric skills—creativity, resilience, empathy, collaboration, and lifelong learning—have shifted from ‘soft’ extras to strategic necessities. Drawing on the World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025 and global data from employers, educators, and learning platforms, this episode maps demand and supply, highlights regional gaps, and shows how education and hiring systems often fail to recognize these capabilities.The paper documents the surprising fragility of these skills (pandemic-era declines in resilience and teaching), their limited visibility in job postings, and their low automation risk under generative AI—making them both scarce and increasingly valuable. It also summarizes industry and regional patterns and the long time horizons many learners need to develop higher‑order human skills.Finally, the episode proposes a nine‑principle roadmap for assessment, development, and credentialing—emphasizing authentic performance tasks, psychologically safe learning environments, and portable digital credentials—and presents case studies (AWS, PwC, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Udemy, Majid Al Futtaim) that illustrate scalable, equitable approaches to make the human edge a measurable, portable asset.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
AI is reshaping work into partnerships between people, agentic AI, and robots — not simply eliminating jobs. Current technologies could technically automate about 57% of US work hours, but more than 70% of today’s skills span both automatable and non-automatable activities and will therefore evolve rather than disappear. Reimagining end-to-end workflows, not just isolated tasks, could unlock roughly $2.9 trillion in US value by 2030.Success depends on deliberate organizational choices: redesigning processes around human–machine collaboration, investing in broad AI fluency and complementary skills, and equipping managers to orchestrate hybrid teams. Early adopters in sales, customer service, healthcare, and IT show large efficiency and quality gains, underscoring that leadership, culture, and training will determine whether AI expands opportunity or concentrates it.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
This episode exposes how industrial‑organizational psychology has long sidelined organized labor, narrowing the field's theories and limiting its impact on worker wellbeing.It traces historical roots, documents practical harms—from incomplete voice mechanisms to inequitable outcomes—and outlines concrete pathways for repair: collaborative research, bargaining support, curriculum reform, and ethical standards that center workers as legitimate stakeholders.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
This episode breaks down why most leadership programs stop short of real workplace change and shows evidence-based ways to close the gap.Learn practical, research-backed strategies—pre-training motivation, manager-led support, psychological safety, aligned performance systems, and integrated learning architectures—that help leaders apply and sustain new behaviors.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
As AI reshapes professional work, this episode examines how algorithmic systems can both empower and erode human agency—operational, epistemic, and developmental—and why maintaining meaningful control matters for quality, trust, and worker wellbeing.Drawing on research and policy developments, it outlines evidence-based responses: calibrated transparency, co-design and participatory governance, capability-building for hybrid expertise, and human-centered workflow design to prevent complacency and skill loss.It concludes with practical recommendations for dynamic reconfiguration, collective oversight, and purpose-aligned AI integration so organizations can capture AI’s benefits without sacrificing human judgment or long-term capability.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
As AI reshapes professional work, this episode examines how algorithmic systems can both empower and erode human agency—operational, epistemic, and developmental—and why maintaining meaningful control matters for quality, trust, and worker wellbeing.
Drawing on research and policy developments, it outlines evidence-based responses: calibrated transparency, co-design and participatory governance, capability-building for hybrid expertise, and human-centered workflow design to prevent complacency and skill loss.
It concludes with practical recommendations for dynamic reconfiguration, collective oversight, and purpose-aligned AI integration so organizations can capture AI’s benefits without sacrificing human judgment or long-term capability.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
This episode examines the steady decline of public confidence in institutions and how the rise of AI intensifies both risks and opportunities for trust. Drawing on institutional theory and research on organizational justice, it outlines evidence-based responses—transparent communication, procedural fairness, capability building, governance and accountability, and psychological contract recalibration—that organizations can use to rebuild legitimacy.
Listeners will learn practical interventions and long-term strategies to ensure AI enhances institutional missions rather than undermines them, with emphasis on stakeholder voice, continuous learning, and mission-aligned deployment.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
This episode examines the steady decline of public confidence in institutions and how the rise of AI intensifies both risks and opportunities for trust. Drawing on institutional theory and research on organizational justice, it outlines evidence-based responses—transparent communication, procedural fairness, capability building, governance and accountability, and psychological contract recalibration—that organizations can use to rebuild legitimacy.Listeners will learn practical interventions and long-term strategies to ensure AI enhances institutional missions rather than undermines them, with emphasis on stakeholder voice, continuous learning, and mission-aligned deployment.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Abstract: Education stands at an inflection point. Emerging technologies, shifting labor markets, and epistemic turbulence challenge the industrial-era model of schooling organized around discrete subjects, rote mastery, and credentialing. This article examines the conceptual and practical shift toward learning environments structured as immersive "cognitive studios"—transdisciplinary spaces where students engage with authentic, unsolved problems rather than pre-packaged curricula. Drawing on learning sciences research, cognitive development theory, and documented educational innovations, the article explores how technology-enhanced learning systems can support both individual cognitive formation and collaborative sense-making. Analysis of pioneering programs illuminates pathways toward environments optimized for synthesis, discernment, and cognitive sovereignty: the capacity to navigate complexity, construct knowledge, and maintain epistemic agency in information-saturated contexts. The article identifies organizational responses including studio-based curriculum design, adaptive learning architectures, transdisciplinary faculty structures, and assessment regimes oriented toward intellectual formation rather than standardized recall.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Abstract: Organizational change fatigue has evolved from a temporary stress response into a chronic condition affecting workforce performance, innovation capacity, and strategic execution. Drawing on evidence from organizational psychology, change management research, and neuroscience, this article examines how continuous transformation initiatives—accelerated by technological disruption, market volatility, and post-pandemic reorganization—deplete individual and collective resources while paradoxically demanding greater adaptability. The analysis reveals that traditional change management approaches, designed for episodic transformation, prove inadequate in conditions of permanent turbulence. Evidence-based interventions emphasize building change fitness through everyday developmental practices, establishing organizational rhythm and predictability, cultivating psychological safety, and developing leaders' negative capability. Organizations that shift from managing discrete changes to building adaptive capacity demonstrate improved employee wellbeing, sustained performance during transition periods, and competitive advantage in volatile markets. The article concludes with frameworks for long-term organizational resilience that treat adaptability as a renewable resource rather than a depletable asset.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Abstract: Organizational change fatigue has evolved from a temporary stress response into a chronic condition affecting workforce performance, innovation capacity, and strategic execution. Drawing on evidence from organizational psychology, change management research, and neuroscience, this article examines how continuous transformation initiatives—accelerated by technological disruption, market volatility, and post-pandemic reorganization—deplete individual and collective resources while paradoxically demanding greater adaptability. The analysis reveals that traditional change management approaches, designed for episodic transformation, prove inadequate in conditions of permanent turbulence. Evidence-based interventions emphasize building change fitness through everyday developmental practices, establishing organizational rhythm and predictability, cultivating psychological safety, and developing leaders' negative capability. Organizations that shift from managing discrete changes to building adaptive capacity demonstrate improved employee wellbeing, sustained performance during transition periods, and competitive advantage in volatile markets. The article concludes with frameworks for long-term organizational resilience that treat adaptability as a renewable resource rather than a depletable asset.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Abstract: The fourth Anthropic Economic Index reveals a striking paradox in artificial intelligence adoption: despite unprecedented accessibility, AI effectiveness remains tightly coupled to user cognitive capital. Analysis of one million Claude conversations shows a near-perfect correlation (r > 0.92) between the educational sophistication of user prompts and AI responses, suggesting that AI systems amplify rather than eliminate human skill differentials. Unlike previous general-purpose technologies that delivered productivity gains relatively independent of user expertise, generative AI requires structured reasoning, precise communication, and critical evaluation—precisely the foundational capabilities often assumed obsolete in an automated economy. This report synthesizes findings from Anthropic's latest research with broader economic evidence to demonstrate that AI is creating a new form of skill-biased technological change, where success depends less on access to tools than on the human capital required to wield them effectively. Organizations investing in workforce development around core literacy, analytical reasoning, and structured communication may capture disproportionate returns, while those focused solely on technological deployment risk widening internal capability gaps. For practitioners navigating AI transformation, the implication is clear: the future advantage lies not in automation alone, but in cultivating the foundational human skills that make automation valuable.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Abstract: The fourth Anthropic Economic Index reveals a striking paradox in artificial intelligence adoption: despite unprecedented accessibility, AI effectiveness remains tightly coupled to user cognitive capital. Analysis of one million Claude conversations shows a near-perfect correlation (r > 0.92) between the educational sophistication of user prompts and AI responses, suggesting that AI systems amplify rather than eliminate human skill differentials. Unlike previous general-purpose technologies that delivered productivity gains relatively independent of user expertise, generative AI requires structured reasoning, precise communication, and critical evaluation—precisely the foundational capabilities often assumed obsolete in an automated economy. This report synthesizes findings from Anthropic's latest research with broader economic evidence to demonstrate that AI is creating a new form of skill-biased technological change, where success depends less on access to tools than on the human capital required to wield them effectively. Organizations investing in workforce development around core literacy, analytical reasoning, and structured communication may capture disproportionate returns, while those focused solely on technological deployment risk widening internal capability gaps. For practitioners navigating AI transformation, the implication is clear: the future advantage lies not in automation alone, but in cultivating the foundational human skills that make automation valuable.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Abstract: As artificial intelligence adoption accelerates across sectors, organizations face mounting pressure to demonstrate immediate returns on AI investments, often through workforce reductions that outpace actual automation capabilities. This pattern reflects longstanding corporate short-termism rather than genuine technological displacement, yet it foreshadows deeper structural challenges as AI systems mature. Drawing on labor economics, organizational behavior, and technology adoption research, this article examines how managerial incentives drive premature workforce contraction, the macroeconomic risks of AI-led unemployment, and evidence-based policy responses. The analysis argues that gradual, policy-led work-time reduction represents not merely a quality-of-life enhancement but essential economic stabilization infrastructure. Through examination of historical work-time transitions, contemporary pilot programs, and cross-sector implementation strategies, the article demonstrates how coordinated reduction in standard working hours can preserve employment, maintain aggregate demand, and distribute productivity gains equitably. Organizations and policymakers that treat work-time policy as foundational economic planning will better position their economies to harness AI's benefits while mitigating systemic instability.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Abstract: As artificial intelligence adoption accelerates across sectors, organizations face mounting pressure to demonstrate immediate returns on AI investments, often through workforce reductions that outpace actual automation capabilities. This pattern reflects longstanding corporate short-termism rather than genuine technological displacement, yet it foreshadows deeper structural challenges as AI systems mature. Drawing on labor economics, organizational behavior, and technology adoption research, this article examines how managerial incentives drive premature workforce contraction, the macroeconomic risks of AI-led unemployment, and evidence-based policy responses. The analysis argues that gradual, policy-led work-time reduction represents not merely a quality-of-life enhancement but essential economic stabilization infrastructure. Through examination of historical work-time transitions, contemporary pilot programs, and cross-sector implementation strategies, the article demonstrates how coordinated reduction in standard working hours can preserve employment, maintain aggregate demand, and distribute productivity gains equitably. Organizations and policymakers that treat work-time policy as foundational economic planning will better position their economies to harness AI's benefits while mitigating systemic instability.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Abstract: Organizations invest billions annually in capability development—training programs, operational frameworks, digital tools—yet performance remains inconsistent when conditions shift or pressure intensifies. This discrepancy suggests that traditional skill-based interventions address only part of the performance equation. Drawing on cognitive load theory, affective neuroscience, self-determination theory, and organizational behavior research, this article introduces the Dynamic Behavior Readiness System (DBRS) framework. DBRS reconceptualizes workplace behavior not as a stable individual trait but as an emergent system property shaped by five interdependent readiness states: cognitive, emotional, motivational, physiological, and interpersonal. Rather than defaulting to remedial training or dispositional attribution when performance falters, the DBRS approach equips leaders to diagnose state-level compromises and engineer organizational conditions that restore and sustain behavioral readiness. Evidence from healthcare, aviation, manufacturing, and professional services demonstrates that system-level interventions targeting readiness states yield more reliable performance outcomes than capability-building initiatives alone.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Comments
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
United States