The Wingo Network

Anthony Kim’s victory at LIV Golf Adelaide was more than a comeback story — it raised a legitimate question about the Masters and Augusta National. Sixteen years after his last professional win at the 2010 Shell Houston Open, Anthony Kim came from five shots back in the final round to defeat Jon Rahm and Bryson DeChambeau in front of more than 115,000 fans in Australia. For many golf fans, that result alone would be remarkable. But when you consider the full arc of Kim’s career — his rapid rise in 2008, his Ryder Cup heroics at Valhalla, his Presidents Cup appearances, the Achilles injury, the reported insurance settlement, and more than a decade away from competitive golf — the implications extend far beyond a single LIV event. In this episode, Trey Wingo breaks down why Kim’s win resonates across the sport and why the conversation now shifts to Augusta National. The Masters is an invitation-only tournament. It is not governed by points alone. It is shaped by discretion, legacy, and institutional decision-making. And after Adelaide, the question becomes unavoidable: should the Masters extend an invitation to Anthony Kim? Topics discussed include: Anthony Kim’s early PGA Tour dominance and Ryder Cup moment in 2008 The 2010 Houston Open and the long gap between professional wins The reported insurance settlement and years away from competition Kim’s initial struggles upon returning to LIV Golf What made the Adelaide victory different from other LIV wins Jon Rahm and Bryson DeChambeau as the established standard on LIV Why authenticity — not prize money — made this moment resonate The Official World Golf Ranking implications How Augusta National evaluates invitations The legacy impact of a potential Masters appearance Trey also explores the broader context within professional golf: the power dynamics between LIV Golf and the PGA Tour, the ongoing debate around legitimacy, and how moments like this influence perception. LIV Golf was built on massive contracts and headline signings, yet its most compelling moment may have come from a player who had to fight his way back into competitive form rather than one who arrived with a guaranteed payday. The central question is not about format or prize money. It is about meaning. Anthony Kim’s win felt earned. It felt authentic. And in a sport currently defined by structural change, governance tension, and debates over tradition versus disruption, authenticity carries weight. If Augusta National chooses to invite Anthony Kim to the Masters, it would not simply be a gesture toward a former star. It would be a statement about redemption, merit, and what still matters in championship golf. If they choose not to, that decision carries meaning as well. This episode examines why this moment extends beyond Adelaide and why the Masters now sits at the center of the conversation. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Billy Horschel joins Trey Wingo for a wide-ranging and honest conversation about the future of the PGA Tour, the changing golf landscape, and the debate surrounding THE PLAYERS Championship as a potential fifth major. We start with a big question: Should the PGA Tour season begin after the Super Bowl? Billy explains why golf’s nearly year-round schedule may be working against itself — and why a true offseason could strengthen the Tour’s product, improve viewership, and better compete with the NFL. With PGA Tour ratings surging during peak windows and dipping during football season, is it time for a reset? We also dive into: • The PGA Tour schedule changes and potential reduction in events • Why Hawaii events may be on the chopping block • The impact of football season on golf ratings • WM Phoenix Open fan behavior and tournament adjustments • LIV Golf players returning to the PGA Tour • Brooks Koepka’s comeback and the reintegration process • Patrick Reed’s pathway back • Saudi PIF’s role in global sports and the future of LIV • The evolving power dynamics in professional golf Then we get to the conversation that has the golf world buzzing: Is THE PLAYERS Championship a major? Billy makes the case. He explains why THE PLAYERS, played at TPC Sawgrass, has the strongest field in golf outside the traditional four majors — The Masters, PGA Championship, U.S. Open, and The Open Championship. He says if he wins THE PLAYERS, he would personally consider it a major. We break down: • What defines a major championship • Who decides what counts as a major • The historical shift in golf’s major structure • Whether perception alone can elevate an event • Why the PGA Tour might want THE PLAYERS viewed differently Billy also opens up about which major means the most to him — and why lifting the Claret Jug at The Open Championship would be the ultimate career moment. This isn’t a shouting match. It’s not clickbait. It’s an informed discussion about business strategy, tradition vs. evolution, and where professional golf is headed. If you care about the PGA Tour, LIV Golf, THE PLAYERS Championship, and the future of the game — this conversation matters. These are straight facts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Golf has always been shaped by perception as much as precedent — and that’s exactly why a serious conversation is forming around THE PLAYERS Championship.After the PGA Tour released a promo declaring “March is going to be major,” the question became unavoidable:Is THE PLAYERS being positioned as golf’s fifth major?And more importantly — why now?In this episode of Trey Wingo Golf, we break down what’s actually happening beneath the surface. This isn’t about rewriting history or disrespecting tradition. It’s about understanding how majors have always been defined, and how the modern game continues to evolve.We cover:Why the concept of “majors” has never been officially codifiedHow perception — not paperwork — shaped the current four majorsWhy THE PLAYERS has long been treated like a major without the labelThe role of TPC Sawgrass and the pressure it createsWhy the field at THE PLAYERS is often as strong as — or stronger than — some majorsHow television, sponsorship, and global attention factor into the conversationWhy the PGA Tour, despite its influence, does not own a single majorAnd why elevating THE PLAYERS would fundamentally change golf’s power dynamicsFrom Bobby Jones and Arnold Palmer to Brian Rolapp’s philosophy of “respect tradition, but don’t be bound by it,” this episode connects golf’s past to its present — and possibly its future.No hot takes. No clickbait.Just a clear explanation of why this conversation exists, why it’s happening now, and what it could mean for the game.Is THE PLAYERS already a major in everything but name?Or does calling it one change the sport forever?That’s what we unpack here. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The Seattle Seahawks didn’t win Super Bowl 60 with flash or noise. They won it by playing smarter football than everyone else. In this episode of Straight Facts, Homie, Trey Wingo breaks down how discipline, decision-making, and data shaped a dominant Super Bowl performance from kickoff to the final whistle.This wasn’t about one player carrying the game. It was about trusting points, protecting the football, and leaning on a complete roster. Trey explains why Mike McDonald’s willingness to take field goals, trust his defense, and avoid panic moments created constant pressure on New England. The result was a game that never truly tilted back once Seattle established control.The episode also dives into what this game revealed about quarterback play on the biggest stage. Sam Darnold didn’t force the issue. He extended drives, avoided turnovers, and executed exactly what the situation required. Trey explains why those subtle, often overlooked moments mattered more than box-score stats and why postseason football rewards restraint as much as aggression.Finally, Trey zooms out to the roster-building lessons that Super Bowl 60 reinforced. From defensive dominance to salary-cap efficiency at running back, the data tells a clear story about how championships are actually constructed in today’s NFL. As teams head into free agency and the draft, this game offers a blueprint worth paying attention to.This is not a recap. It’s an explanation of why the Seahawks won, how they did it, and what it means for the rest of the league going forward. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The Miracle on Ice is remembered as one of the greatest upsets in sports history — but as Trey Wingo explains, it was far more than a hockey game. It was a rare moment when sports unified an entire country, cutting across generations, politics, and daily life in a way that feels almost impossible today.On this episode of Straight Facts, Homie, Trey is joined by documentary directors Max Gershberg and Jake Rogal to discuss Miracle: The Boys of ’80. They break down why this story still resonates 45 years later, how returning to Lake Placid unlocked deep emotion from the players, and why younger audiences are discovering the moment for the first time.The conversation goes beyond nostalgia. Trey challenges whether modern sports — in an era of streaming, social media, and fractured attention — can still produce moments that transcend the game itself. From father-son memories to cultural impact, this is a thoughtful, no-bullshit look at what sports used to mean, and what may be lost. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

LIV Golf finally got what it’s been demanding for years: Official World Golf Ranking (OWGR) points.But when you look closely at how those points are being awarded, the celebration falls apart fast.In this episode of Straight Facts, Trey Wingo breaks down what the OWGR decision actually means — and why it’s less a breakthrough and more a reality check. Yes, LIV players will now receive ranking points. But the structure tells a very clear story: OWGR does not believe LIV has depth, competitive strength, or tour credibility beyond a small handful of stars.Think of it this way:OWGR didn’t serve LIV a steak dinner.They handed them a kids meal.Only the top 10 finishers at LIV events receive points. Everyone else? Zero. Meanwhile, full fields on the PGA Tour, DP World Tour, Korn Ferry Tour — even developmental tours — are rewarded across the board based on depth and competition.Trey walks through:Why LIV’s OWGR points are dramatically lower than PGA Tour eventsHow field depth — not star power — drives rankingsWhy LIV’s move to 72 holes actually exposes internal contradictionsThe data behind OWGR’s evaluation of LIV’s competitive strengthWhy players complaining about playing four rounds undermines their own caseHow recent defections (Brooks Koepka, Patrick Reed, Kevin Na) change the power balanceAnd why LIV keeps hurting itself just when it gets “good news”This isn’t about emotion.It’s not about loyalty.It’s about math, structure, and competitive reality.LIV wanted legitimacy.OWGR gave them a taste — and made it clear they’re still sitting at the kids’ table. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Justin Rose delivered one of the most dominant performances we’ve seen at Torrey Pines — shooting a staggering 23-under par on a course built to host major championships. But that was only the starting point of a much bigger conversation.Trey Wingo is joined by former PGA Tour player and analyst Brendon de Jonge to break down why Rose’s win matters, how rare it is to see a 45-year-old golfer playing this efficiently, and what it says about longevity, preparation, and course management at the elite level.De Jonge explains that Torrey Pines doesn’t give away scores — which makes Rose’s performance stand out immediately to anyone who has played it. From driving accuracy to putting to decision-making, this was one of those weeks where everything aligned, something even elite players experience only a handful of times in their careers.From there, the discussion widens to Rose’s full career arc — from teenage prodigy, to early struggles, to major champion, Ryder Cup pillar, and now a late-career resurgence fueled by fitness, recovery, and experience. Trey and Brendon debate whether Rose has already done enough to be considered a Hall of Famer and what still might separate him from that final tier.The episode also tackles the return of Brooks Koepka to the PGA Tour, both competitively and culturally. De Jonge breaks down why Brooks’ week at Torrey Pines was a success regardless of finish, how his peers received him, and why the competitive environment on the PGA Tour still matters deeply to elite players. The conversation naturally expands into the shifting balance of power between LIV Golf and the PGA Tour, including contract realities, competitive motivation, and what recent comments from players like Koepka, Patrick Reed, Bryson DeChambeau, and Jon Rahm may be signaling.Trey and Brendon also zoom out on the future structure of the PGA Tour, discussing condensed schedules, field sizes, major placement, and how the Tour may evolve beginning in 2027 — including the tension between protecting elite events while preserving the developmental pipeline that has defined the Tour for decades.To close, the conversation takes a turn toward golf beyond the U.S., as de Jonge shares insights on playing golf in Africa, highlighting must-play courses across South Africa and Zimbabwe, the unique experience of safari golf, and why the game’s global growth matters.This episode isn’t just about one win — it’s about where the game is, where it’s headed, and who is still shaping it. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The Seattle Seahawks didn’t come out of nowhere — and they’re not winning by accident.In this episode of Straight Facts Homie, former Seahawks quarterback Matt Hasselbeck breaks down who this Seattle team really is, why their success is sustainable, and what people may have missed if they haven’t been watching closely all season.This isn’t about headlines or narratives. It’s about identity.Matt explains how Seattle wins games:how they manage situations, why their defense travels, how they avoid beating themselves, and why this team looks eerily familiar to anyone who’s been around winning football before. From game management to fundamentals, this is a team that understands exactly who it is — and plays accordingly.As the matchup approaches, Hasselbeck also gives context for what makes the Seahawks dangerous right now, especially against teams that don’t force them out of their comfort zone. It’s a film-room conversation without the film — rooted in experience, preparation, and execution.If you haven’t been paying attention to the Seahawks, this is the episode that gets you up to speed.No hot takes.No mythology.Just football. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The Patriots are back on the biggest stage in football, and for anyone paying attention, the path looks eerily familiar.Trey Wingo is joined by former Patriots Super Bowl champion Damien Woody to break down why this run feels so unmistakably “Patriots,” even in a new era. From elite defensive play and disciplined game management to situational football and roster development, this isn’t about nostalgia — it’s about structure, standards, and a system that continues to produce results.Damien explains why championship teams aren’t built on splash alone, how the Patriots’ approach to field position, decision-making, and risk avoidance separates them in January, and why so many teams still fail to understand the value of points, patience, and pressure. The conversation also dives into coaching philosophy, why ultra-aggressive fourth-down decisions are costing teams games, and how New England continues to make opponents beat themselves.This episode is less about any single personality and more about the DNA that has defined the Patriots for decades — a formula rooted in discipline, adaptability, and clarity of purpose. As the league evolves and trends swing wildly, the Patriots remain proof that fundamentals still win when the margins matter most.If you’re wondering why New England keeps finding its way back into the conversation — even when the names and eras change — this breakdown explains exactly how and why it happens.These are straight facts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Bill Belichick not being a first-ballot Hall of Famer should not be a debate — and yet here we are.On this episode of Straight Facts Homie, Trey Wingo is joined by Super Bowl champion Damien Woody to break down how the Pro Football Hall of Fame voting process completely failed one of the greatest coaches in NFL history.Belichick’s résumé is not subjective:6 Super Bowls as a head coach8 total Super Bowl rings2nd-most wins all-time17 division titles19 playoff appearances17 straight seasons with 10+ winsAnd yet, he didn’t receive enough votes to be inducted on the first ballot.Woody and Wingo dig into why this decision isn’t just baffling — it’s damaging. From the role of personal grudges and old rivalries, to the lingering misuse of Spygate and Deflategate as retroactive punishment, this conversation exposes a Hall of Fame process that has drifted away from performance and into politics.This isn’t about whether you liked Bill Belichick.This isn’t about media relationships or hurt feelings.This is about legacy — and whether the most exclusive fraternity in sports is still capable of honoring greatness objectively.When a coach who built two dynasties can be forced to “wait his turn,” the problem isn’t Bill Belichick.The problem is the system.These are the straight facts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Patrick Reed is officially on his way back to the PGA Tour — and this isn’t an isolated move. It’s confirmation of something we’ve been saying for months.Trey Wingo breaks down why Reed’s decision to leave LIV and return to the PGA Tour is the clearest signal yet that the balance of power in professional golf is shifting. This isn’t about one player. It’s about momentum, competition, and what happens when elite athletes realize money alone doesn’t replace the crucible.We told you in December that Brooks Koepka wanting back was the beginning. Now Patrick Reed has followed. And once one goes, another goes — that’s how this always works.Trey walks through:Why Reed’s return matters more than people realizeHow LIV’s structure fails true competitors over timeWhy measuring yourself against the best still matters more than guaranteed moneyThe growing spotlight now on Bryson DeChambeau and others still under LIV contractsAnd why this moment feels less like a surprise — and more like the tip of the icebergThere’s a reason Reed’s statement emphasized tradition, legacy, and where his story began. There’s a reason Brooks openly said he wants to compete against Rory and Scottie again. And there’s a reason LIV players suddenly sound far less enthusiastic when asked about the future.LIV isn’t disappearing tomorrow. But ships don’t sink all at once. They take on water compartment by compartment — until it’s too late to stop it.This episode isn’t about hot takes or rooting interests. It’s about reading the room, understanding incentives, and recognizing when a trend has crossed the point of no return.Because in elite sports, competitors always tell you the truth eventually — with their actions.And Patrick Reed just did. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Bill Belichick not being elected as a first-ballot Pro Football Hall of Famer shouldn’t be controversial — and yet, here we are.Belichick is the most decorated coach in NFL history.Six Super Bowls as a head coach.Eight total Super Bowl rings.Second-most wins all-time.Seventeen division titles.Nineteen playoff appearances.Seventeen straight seasons with double-digit wins.Those aren’t opinions. Those are facts.And yet, despite a résumé that stands above every modern coach, Belichick reportedly failed to receive enough votes for first-ballot induction. The reasoning? Alleged “penance” tied to Spygate and Deflategate — controversies that were already investigated, adjudicated, and punished by the league at the time.That raises a much bigger issue.The Pro Football Hall of Fame is supposed to be the most exclusive fraternity in sports — a place reserved for performance, impact, and greatness. Not personal vendettas. Not political grievances. Not retroactive punishment driven by rivalries or resentment.In this episode of Straight Facts Homie, Trey Wingo breaks down:Why Belichick’s résumé makes first-ballot status indisputableWhy using past scandals as justification now is fundamentally flawedHow a voting system with only 50 voters creates massive exposure to biasWhy this decision reflects a deeper problem with Hall of Fame governanceAnd why, if this standard holds, the idea of “first-ballot” greatness stops meaning anything at allThis isn’t about defending Belichick’s personality.It’s not about excusing controversy.And it’s not about nostalgia.It’s about performance vs. punishment — and whether the Hall of Fame is honoring excellence or settling old scores.Because if Bill Belichick isn’t a first-ballot Hall of Famer…then the definition of greatness has officially been rewritten.And that’s a problem for the sport. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Matthew Stafford just played one of the best seasons of his career — at age 37 — and came within a few plays of taking the Rams back to the Super Bowl. That’s exactly what makes the question unavoidable.Is Matthew Stafford done?This episode isn’t about hot takes or speculation for clicks. It’s about understanding what happens if Stafford decides to walk away — and why that single decision would trigger massive consequences for the Los Angeles Rams.Stafford is under contract for one more year, but the reality is clear: elite seasons at this stage don’t come often, and opportunities like this one don’t repeat themselves. If he returns, the Rams remain legitimate contenders. If he retires, everything changes — immediately.We break down:Why Stafford’s level of play makes this decision harder, not easierHow his retirement would impact Sean McVay’s futureWhat it means for Davante Adams and the rest of the rosterWhy this wouldn’t be a gradual transition, but an instant resetHow close the Rams really were — and why that matters nowThis isn’t about whether Stafford can still play. The tape says he absolutely can. The question is whether he wants to keep doing it — and whether the Rams are prepared for the fallout if he doesn’t.One decision.One player.An entire franchise hanging in the balance.Those are the straight facts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Shedeur Sanders was named a Pro Bowl selection — and that decision raises a much bigger question about what the Pro Bowl actually represents in today’s NFL.In this episode of Straight Facts Homie, Trey Wingo breaks down the data, the context, and the league incentives behind a Pro Bowl selection that doesn’t align with on-field production. This isn’t a subjective debate or a hot take — it’s an objective look at the numbers, the replacement process, and what happens when merit collides with marketing.Sanders’ 2025 season featured flashes of promise and the expected growing pains of a rookie quarterback. But when you strip away the name recognition and focus strictly on performance metrics — QBR, touchdowns vs. interceptions, completion percentage, and wins — the Pro Bowl case simply doesn’t hold up. And that’s not an indictment of the player. It’s an indictment of the system.Trey explains why this selection says far more about the state of the Pro Bowl than it does about Shedeur Sanders — and why the NFL is increasingly forced to chase attention, clicks, and relevance as top-tier players opt out of participating altogether.The episode also examines:Why Pro Bowl replacements are now driven by availability, not excellenceHow declining player participation has eroded the game’s credibilityWhy all-star games across sports are losing meaning — and what the NFL is trying to do about itThe uncomfortable reality that popularity is now part of the selection equationWhether it’s time to fundamentally rethink — or completely retire — the Pro Bowl as we know itThis is not a personal critique. It’s a reality check.If the Pro Bowl is meant to recognize elite performance, the process has to reflect that. And if it can’t, the league has to be honest about what the event has become.Straight facts. No emotion. No agendas. Just the data. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Scottie Scheffler is picking up right where he left off.The 2026 PGA Tour season opens, and once again, the story starts with Scottie Scheffler standing alone at the top. He wins the first event of the year in convincing fashion — even with a late double bogey — reinforcing a reality the rest of the field is already living with: when Scottie shows up, everyone else is playing for second.Trey Wingo breaks down why this win matters beyond the trophy. It’s not just about starting the year 1-0 — it’s about what Scottie Scheffler’s body of work now looks like in historical context. Before turning 30, Scheffler has entered a category occupied by only two names in the modern era: Jack Nicklaus and Tiger Woods. Twenty PGA Tour wins. Four major championships. Lifetime Tour membership secured.But the most interesting part of Scottie’s run isn’t how fast it started — it’s how sustainable it looks.After going winless in his first 70 PGA Tour starts, Scheffler has now won 20 times over his next 81 starts, including 14 wins in his last 35 events. That’s a winning rate that rivals the most dominant stretches the sport has ever seen. And unlike Tiger Woods’ early career, Scottie’s swing is less violent, his off-course life more grounded, and his approach to the game noticeably different.This video looks at:Why Scottie Scheffler’s opening-week win sets the tone for the entire seasonHow his statistical profile compares to Tiger Woods and Jack Nicklaus at the same stageWhy the upcoming PGA Tour schedule changes make 2026 a uniquely important seasonWhat separates Scottie’s dominance from past greats — and why that may matter long-termA realistic over/under for Scheffler’s wins this season based on historical dataAs the PGA Tour prepares for structural changes in the coming years, this may be the final season with a full slate of events — and Scottie Scheffler is positioned to take full advantage. The numbers are historic. The consistency is real. And the question isn’t whether Scottie is the best player in the world — it’s how far this run can go.New year. Same Scotty. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Trey Wingo sits down with longtime ESPN storyteller and golf insider Jimmy Roberts for a wide-ranging conversation that connects the dots between Tiger Woods, the modern PGA Tour vs LIV Golf era, and why the Ryder Cup still hits differently in Europe than it does in the U.S.Jimmy takes us back to how he accidentally became ESPN’s golf reporter (“I was looking around and had to think… what could I cover that nobody cares about?”) — and how Tiger’s arrival instantly transformed golf into must-see TV. He shares personal stories from the earliest Tiger years, including what it was like covering Tiger as an amateur and the moment it became obvious: golf was never going to be the same.From there, Trey and Jimmy dig into the post-LIV landscape: what LIV actually brought into the ecosystem, what the PGA Tour had to change because of it, and why the conversation gets more complicated when you zoom out beyond U.S. ratings and consider golf’s global growth. They also get into the modern business reality of the sport — including the shift to PGA Tour Enterprises, private equity investment, and players becoming equity partners — and what that could mean for the future of competition, scheduling, and fan clarity.And because you can’t talk about golf’s soul without going there: Trey and Jimmy unpack the Ryder Cup problem. Jimmy makes the case that, culturally, it simply means more in Europe year-round — and Trey shares why it’s his favorite sporting event, even when it drives him insane as an American fan.They wrap with a look at Jimmy’s newest chapter: “The Big Swing with Jimmy Roberts” — a show focused on the business and personalities shaping golf, from equipment and tourism to technology, simulators, and the massive scale of the modern golf economy.If you care about where golf has been — and where it’s headed next — this is the conversation.Topics include:Jimmy Roberts’ ESPN origin story and how he claimed golf as his laneTiger Woods as an amateur, the “hello world” moment, and the sport’s inflection pointLIV vs PGA Tour: the product, the strategy, and what’s actually at stakeNIL / image rights in golf and why that debate is about to get louderPGA Tour Enterprises, private equity, and the new business model of pro golfRyder Cup culture: why Europe treats it like the Super BowlJimmy’s new show: The Big Swing with Jimmy Roberts Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The future of PGA Tour in Hawaii is suddenly uncertain — and this time, the questions are real.Trey Wingo sits down with Mark Rolfing, the longtime voice of Kapalua and one of the most knowledgeable insiders on golf in Hawaii, to break down what’s actually happening behind the scenes — and why the PGA Tour’s return to the islands is no longer guaranteed.With the Sony Open in Hawaii now standing as the lone remaining PGA Tour stop in the state, Rolfing explains how a perfect storm of forces has put Hawaii’s place on the schedule at risk:• ongoing water-rights litigation• an aging, damaged water-delivery system• post-fire political and public-perception pressure• rising operational costs• and a PGA Tour leadership group openly willing to rethink traditionThis isn’t about whether players love Hawaii — they do. It’s about whether the Tour can commit to events when infrastructure, litigation, and long-term planning remain unresolved.Rolfing also outlines potential solutions being discussed internally, including radical schedule changes, prime-time weekday golf, and a reimagined season kickoff that could allow Hawaii to survive in a reshaped PGA Tour calendar. But time is the enemy — and decisions are coming fast.If you care about the future of professional golf, the evolution of the PGA Tour schedule, or what Hawaii stands to lose if these events disappear, this conversation pulls back the curtain.No hot takes.No guessing.Just straight facts, context, and hard realities about where golf may be headed next. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Divisional Weekend delivered some of the best football of the season — but the outcomes weren’t random, emotional, or controversial. They were mathematical.In this episode of Straight Facts, Homie, Trey Wingo breaks down why every Divisional Round game was decided by the same core data points — and why teams that ignored them paid the price. Turnovers. Possessions. Points. The numbers didn’t just influence the outcomes — they predicted them.Across every matchup, the pattern was unmistakable:• Every team that lost the turnover battle lost the game• Empty possessions decided momentum• Coaches who ignored field goals created impossible margins• Quarterbacks who put the ball in harm’s way ended their seasonUsing game-by-game breakdowns, Trey explains why playoff football still obeys the same laws it always has — even in an era obsessed with aggression, fourth-down models, and “statement” drives. This isn’t about being conservative. It’s about understanding situational math and game theory under pressure.From Josh Allen’s turnovers in Buffalo Bills, to CJ Stroud’s Houston Texans postseason mistakes, to the Chicago Bears leaving points on the field against the Los Angeles Rams, to the Seattle Seahawks’ efficiency overwhelming San Francisco 49ers — the data tells a consistent story. And it’s one the NFL continues to relearn every January.Trey also revisits historical context — including Super Bowl LI — to show why taking points is not weakness, why possession is currency, and why playoff football punishes teams that chase style over certainty.If you want hot takes, this isn’t it.If you want truth backed by evidence, this episode is required viewing.Key topics include:• Why turnover margin decided every Divisional Round game• How “empty drives” kill playoff teams• The field-goal math coaches keep ignoring• Quarterback decision-making under postseason pressure• Why playoff football still favors discipline over aggression• What Divisional Weekend teaches us about Championship SundayThe data doesn’t lie. January football never has. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Tom Hoge is one of the most relatable stories in pro golf — and it starts with two words that became a viral shorthand for who he is: “21C.”After a third-place finish at THE PLAYERS Championship, Hoge was spotted flying home in coach. He leaned into it, retweeted it, and turned the moment into a brand-level truth: know who you are, know who you’re not — and keep grinding.In this episode of Straight Facts, Homie, Trey Wingo sits down with Tom Hoge to go way deeper than the meme. This is a real conversation about what life on the PGA Tour actually looks like for the players who aren’t guaranteed endorsement empires and multi-year exemptions — and why the gap between “elite” and “out of a job” is thinner than most fans realize.Tom breaks down:How close pro golf really is (the difference between top-25 in the world and 200–300 is smaller than people think)Why Q-School is the most pressure many players ever feel — even more than majorsWhat it’s like having your entire year and livelihood ride on one roundHow he survived early seasons outside the top 125 and kept his career aliveThe moment he realized he could actually compete — including getting paired with Tiger WoodsWhat winning on Tour really feels like (and why it can be surprisingly… empty)Why the “data era” helps, but the game still comes down to putting the ball in the holeHow the PGA Tour is changing (shorter schedule talk, signature events, what happens to the “middle” of the Tour)What LIV has changed, what it’s improved, and what it’s fracturedWhy players like Brooks Koepka might want back in — especially if majors and legacy are the priorityThis episode is for golf fans who want the real thing: not highlight reels, not PR, not hot takes — the lived reality of a Tour career built on survival, confidence, and razor-thin margins.If you’ve ever wondered why some pros feel like they’re “hanging on” even while ranking inside the top 100 on Earth — this is the explanation.Subscribe for more conversations like this, and drop a comment:Do you think Q-School would be must-watch TV if it was packaged the right way? Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In this interview, longtime Golf Channel lead host Rich Lerner joins Trey Wingo for a candid, behind-the-scenes conversation about where professional golf is headed and why the PGA Tour is on the verge of meaningful change. Lerner explains why the Tour is likely to prioritize bigger U.S. markets like Chicago, New York, Boston, and Philadelphia, why schedule clarity and “scarcity” matter for the product, and why golf has to protect a real pathway for rising players instead of becoming a closed shop built on sponsor exemptions.They also go deep on golf history and greatness, including Lerner’s framework for Tiger Woods vs. Jack Nicklaus and what truly separates dominance from longevity. Lerner lays out why Tiger’s peak might be the highest level the sport has ever seen, how Scottie Scheffler stacks up statistically against Tiger’s most dominant stretches, and why the conversation should be grounded in win rates and margins, not just vibes. It’s a data-backed look at what “greatness” actually means in golf.Finally, the episode hits the biggest modern tension point: the uncertainty around the PGA Tour, private investment, and LIV Golf. Lerner shares why players like Brooks Koepka could want back in, what the Tour has to solve to create better fields and clearer stakes, and why cuts, consequences, and opportunity are still the heartbeat of the sport. If you care about what comes next for pro golf, this is the context you’ve been missing. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.