AUTM on the Air

The Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) is a public-private partnership with centers in all 50 states and Puerto Rico. This episode dives into MEP and the MEP National Network—an initiative that has been a pillar of U.S. manufacturing, offering comprehensive solutions to manufacturers across the country and fueling growth and innovation in the sector.Joining us for this discussion are two distinguished experts. First, we have Nagesh Rao, the acting director of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership at NIST. With over 25 years of experience across the public, private, and non-profit sectors, Nagesh brings a wealth of knowledge to the table. He previously served as Chief Information Officer for the Bureau of Industry and Security at the U.S. Department of Commerce, co-developed federal initiatives like i6 Green and Patents for Humanity, and led crucial technology efforts during the COVID-19 response.David McFeeters-Krone is a commercialization and business development executive with over 25 years of experience at MIT, NASA-RTTC, Intel, and his own firm. He currently manages a Manufacturing Extension Partnership (OMEP) grant, engaging small manufacturers with the ManufacturingUSA institutes. David has reviewed numerous commercialization plans, founded two companies, and serves as an adjunct professor at Portland State University. He has established strategic R&D partnerships with organizations like the U.S. Air Force, NASA, and NIST, and was awarded the Federal Lab Consortium’s Outstanding Service Award in 2008.In this episode, we’ll explore the MEP National Network’s role in supporting U.S. manufacturers, discuss innovative approaches to growth and competitiveness in the manufacturing sector, and gain valuable insights from Nagesh and David.In This Episode:[02:57] Nagesh shares how his background has led to innovation in the manufacturing sector.[03:41] Nagesh started my career in technology transfer and commercialization back in 2002 at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.  [04:29] Coming to the MEP program in 2023 was a full circle journey of his career. He worked in engineering, public policy, the US patent and trademark office, then worked in industry and the national security space.[05:07] He now ensures evidence-based policy decision making at the federal level to support small and medium-sized manufacturers.[07:10] For our country to be competitive from a national security perspective we need a robust manufacturing scene.[08:20] Challenges include keeping up with software demands and having a talented technical workforce.[10:39] The role of MEP in helping small and medium-sized manufacturers navigate these challenges. MEP has a 30-year history of being a trusted advisor. They meet these manufacturers wherever they are.[11:46] Collaboration ensures new technologies make it from the lab to the production floor.[13:29] MEP is perfectly positioned to help companies overcome hurdles especially with connections. The role of the MEP Advanced Technology Team.[15:11] How the MEP supports tech transfer in the manufacturing sector and the role for tech transfer Professionals in this ecosystem. MEP National Network is a network of networks within a greater network of innovation ecosystems across the United States.[16:10] Think of an MEP center as a hub of excellence for a company that is in the business of manufacturing.[20:08] Navigating the complex balance between academia and industry for a mutually beneficial relationship. Communication, culture, and contact.[22:54] David shares examples of successful partnerships that led to significant advancements in manufacturing technology. One of the examples he uses is 3D printed plastic parts to service forms for metal press part making.[26:02] Measuring the success of the MEP manufacturer initiatives. [27:04] Common pitfalls manufacturers encounter when trying to bring about new technology. Lack of time and not realizing the value of partnerships are common.[34:00] The government has done a tremendous amount of lift for many companies. Large companies know how to use the federal government.[39:59] Predictions for where the MEP is going to go in the next 5 years.[41:16] How making investments to move forward will help in the long run.[46:49]  Advice for getting involved in an MEP Network and supporting local manufacturers includes beginning with connecting with your local center and going to the MEP website on NIST.gov. Resources: NIST MEPMEP National NetworkNagesh RaoDavid McFeeters-KroneDavid McFeeters-Krone LinkedIn

In a world where groundbreaking discoveries often struggle to leave the laboratory, we explore how to transform scientific insights into real-world solutions. We’re focusing on bridging the gap between academic research and community impact.My guest today is Dr. Kendra Stenzel, the Director of Innovation Talent at the University of Kentucky's Office of Technology Commercialization. With her unique blend of scientific expertise and business acumen, Dr. Stenzel is at the forefront of training the next generation of entrepreneurs and commercialization professionals.Armed with a Ph.D. in Pharmacology and an MBA with a focus on entrepreneurship, she serves as a vital bridge between researchers and the Tech Transfer office. Her mission? To help researchers reimagine their work through a commercialization lens, encouraging them to "fail fast and pivot" – a mantra that's reshaping how academic innovations reach the market.She's also a facilitator, helping innovators develop business models, secure funding, and navigate the complex path from lab to market. Her experience with the Kentucky Network for Innovation and Commercialization (KYNETIC) has given her invaluable insights into nurturing early-stage innovations.Today, we explore Dr. Stenzel's perspectives on how researchers can frame their outcomes to maximize community impact, the challenges of commercializing academic research, and her vision for the future of innovation in academia. Let's dive into this conversation about turning scientific breakthroughs into tangible benefits for society. In This Episode:[01:58] One of the main challenges with translating academic research into community impact is education.[02:37] Common misconceptions and challenges include some innovators not understanding that their innovations aren't market ready or community ready and getting innovators to understand the word commercialization.[04:20] The goal is beyond making money, it's having an impact on the community. Getting innovators to accept this reality has a lot to do with being intentional with the relationship.[06:00] Balancing the academic focus on research and the need for commercialization includes relating with the researcher and investing in the relationship. Meeting the researchers in the lab and having the conversation about the science and defining the research and outlining the path forward.[07:10] Barriers that prevent research from making it out of the university include lack of time, having all of the necessary qualifications, and having the knowledge and support.[09:35] From the start they focus on things like the regulatory pathway, prototyping, and the facilities they have to use. Launch Blue has an innovation training program and programs that keep innovators engaged.[10:46] Kendra talks about crucial elements of a successful education program for researchers.[12:09] thinking outside the box and communicating that everyone can be an innovator. [12:53] Money to put towards proof-of-concept development is crucial. The education and framework brought to the innovator is also very important.[14:56] Collaboration and cultivating partnerships that align with university goals and needs of the broader community.[16:44] Measuring the long term impacts of intellectual property assets. Defining success goes back to understanding stakeholders. They do have quantitative metrics to protect intellectual property assets. Kendra likes to look at the qualitative metrics and the innovator and the team.[19:16] The MBA that Kendra is getting has really taught her to think in terms of strategy.[20:43] Advice includes meeting innovators where they are and keeping relationships first.Resources: Kendra Stenzel Director, Innovation Talent Development UKKendra Stenzel University of KentuckyKendra Stenzel LinkedIn

Did you know that despite being behind many groundbreaking inventions and patents, women are less likely to turn their ideas into commercial products? It's a trend that's holding us back, and we're here to explore why. To discuss the experiences and insights of leading women scientists, researchers, and inventors. We have two prolific and leading women with us today.Dr. Marianne Privett, is a Partner and patent attorney with extensive knowledge in chemistry and materials science. Marianne manages patent portfolios for a diverse range of clients, including multinationals and universities, with a focus on clean tech. She's a strong advocate for women inventors and entrepreneurs and actively participates in networks like Women in Health Tech and the Global Women Inventors & Innovators Network.Dr. Aardra Kachroo, a Professor at the University of Kentucky specializing in plant pathology. Her research delves into the intricate signaling mechanisms in plants, particularly how they adapt and respond to various pathogens. Aardra has received numerous awards for her work and is deeply involved in outreach, including workshops for youth and presentations to farmers. In This Episode:[02:18] Marianne shares her journey in science and innovation. She discovered that patents were a good way to marry business with science.[03:26] Aardra always loved science, and she's a researcher. She didn't want to work with animals so she chose plant research.  She has two patents and a company based on one of those.[05:12] Challenges that women inventors face navigating the IP landscape. Research shows that women aren't engaging as much with the patent process.[06:59] There are fewer girls and young women studying STEM subjects.[08:13] We need to have uncomfortable conversations about why women aren't showing up as inventors.[08:32] Aardra shares her patent experience. Her company was patented by her husband. She refers to studies where women want everything to be 100% where a man is more confident and will go ahead before the project reaches that point.[09:38] Women being unwilling to commercialize their innovation because of perfectionism.[10:21] Women also seem to face more barriers than a man in the same position.[12:05] The low percentage of women that get VC funding is scary. Role models also have something to do with this. We need to normalize women entrepreneurs.[14:04] Aardra talks about outreach contributing to the commercialization of research. She shares a story about how what she was doing in the lab was able to make it into society.[16:35] It's easier for a student to understand what you're studying if you show them that it's applicable in the real world.[18:44] Marianne talks about networking groups such as Women in Health Tech and the Global Women Inventors & Innovators Network.[21:44] She also shares global innovation advice for women to protect their inventions.[25:10] Opportunities on the horizon for women inventors. The CHIPS and Science Act creates a more streamlined pathway to innovation and commercialization. There's also a lot of focus on supporting women and minorities.[26:59] Technology, Innovation and Partnerships (TIP) has funding programs for every step of the way.[28:19] The UK also has similar programs just on a smaller scale.[29:35] How tech transfer professionals can better support women.Resources: Dr. Marianne PrivettDr. Marianne Privett LinkedInDr. Aardra KachrooDr. Aardra Kachroo LinkedIn

Tech Transfer professionals have a lot to stay on top of, including the legislative and legal landscape in Washington, DC. My guest today is Jeffrey Depp, who shares his expert knowledge on the current cases we should be aware of.Jeffrey is a registered patent attorney with extensive experience in intellectual property and innovation policy. His diverse background spans university Tech Transfer, the pharmaceutical industry, law, and the federal courts. Currently pursuing his PhD at the University of Pittsburgh, Jeffrey applies an Austrian economics lens to U.S. innovation, bringing a unique perspective to our discussion.In addition to his academic pursuits, Jeffrey consults on biopharmaceutical innovation for the Center for Strategic and International Studies. His commitment to shaping policy is evident through his active involvement in various professional organizations, including his current membership and former role as chair of the Public Policy Legal Task Force at AUTM.In today's episode, we'll explore Jeffrey's rich background and how it influences his current work. We'll provide an overview of this year's comment requests from Washington, DC, discuss the administrative landscape affecting Tech Transfer, and examine recent Supreme Court decisions, including Loper Bright v. Raimondo and SEC v. Jarkesy, and their implications for the tech transfer field. We also look at key decisions in the federal courts and Congress. Jeffrey breaks down these cases and explains their relevance to us, while also sharing tips for tech transfer professionals to stay informed.In This Episode:[01:57] Jeffrey works with a number of organizations in DC trying to promote the progress of science through technology and commercialization.[02:20] He has real world experience and formal training. He spent many years in the pharmaceutical industry and in university technology transfer. He has an MBA. He's a registered patent attorney. He's working on a PhD dissertation focused on the nature and causes of American innovation from an Austrian economics perspective.[03:50] We learn why it's important for tech transfer professionals to stay updated on the legislative activities happening in DC. Staying on top of legislation is just another job that tech transfer professionals have to do.[05:21] Bad policy can devour even the best of science. This is why Jeffrey has gotten involved to help great technology move forward instead of being stifled by bad policy.[06:47] We try to keep our eye on three buckets, the administrative law side of it, what's going on in Congress with legislation, and of course, what the courts are doing.[07:28] This year has been extremely active with nine or so comments requested from agencies.[08:13] The USPTO has put out guidance about who is the inventor when it comes to AI technologies. There has to be sufficient human inventorship in order to be patentable.[10:05] The patent office asked for comments about how to promote more innovation in the marketplace. There were also fee increases.[14:44] Jeffrey talks about more of the comment request issues this year. [17:31] There's another one about the impact of AI on prior art. The human being needs to be paramount in inventorship.[22:29] The last one is about the experimental use exception.[24:43] SEC v. Jarkesy referenced the Oil States case which did directly implicate intellectual property issues.[28:19] Jeffrey talks about the private rights public rights doctrine of patents.[29:01] Jeffrey talks about Loper Bright v. Raimondo.[30:45] We discuss pending cases in the Supreme Court that we should keep an eye on including Cellect, LLC v. Vidal.[31:21] This case is very important for tech transfer professionals to be following. The case establishes bindingprecedent that a terminal disclaimer cuts off any extended patent term granted through PTA. [38:28] Jeffrey shares his thoughts on some of the key decisions in the federal circuit court. Including the LKQ Corp. case which affects design patents.[41:29] We also talk about University of California v. Broad Institute Inc. regarding CRISPR technology. This is important because gene editing is only going to continue to grow in creating health breakthroughs.[45:28] We talk about the legislative side. Congress has introduced multiple patent bills including the Prevail Act, the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act, the Restore Act, RALIA, and the Balancing Incentives Act.[46:16] Problems with the patent system include things that make patents unreliable and things that make patents uncertain.[53:47] Jeffrey talks about the Countering Communist China Act and the Invent Here, Make Here Act.[58:42] We discuss the FTC's move to ban non-compete agreements and how this could affect technology transfer offices.[01:02:53] The best way to stay on top of things is to compartmentalize it in your mind and keep an eye on what's going on in the courts and the federal circuit. The Judiciary Committee has a subcommittee focused on IP. Also focus on the USPTO and the NIH.Resources: Jeffrey Depp LinkedInSEC v. JarkesyLoper Bright v. RaimondoLKQ Corp case v. GMCountering Communist China ActInvent Here, Make Here Act

Innovation is at the heart of both Tech Transfer and human progress. It's in our nature to seek better ways of implementing ideas, but historically, innovation hasn't always received the scholarly attention it deserves, despite technology being integral to our lives—think of the 250,000 patents in a single smartphone. I’m thrilled to have Joy Goswami, Senior Director of Corporate Engagement at Johns Hopkins University, here to talk about the role of Technology Transfer in fostering innovation, distinguishing between invention and innovation, and exploring how tech transfer professionals categorize, assess, and commercialize new inventions.We'll discuss how the invention process begins with disclosure, followed by classification into sustaining, disruptive, and breakthrough technologies, among others. Disruptive innovations, in particular, create entirely new markets. We'll also touch on inspiring stories, like the invention of a glass keyboard for people with disabilities that became part of the iPhone, and a nurse's passion that led to a startup for wearable simulators.As we look to the future, trends such as interdisciplinary research, entrepreneurship, and emerging technologies like AI, machine learning, cybersecurity, and biotechnology will shape the landscape of innovation. Join us to get an inside look into the power of innovation and the bright future of Tech Transfer.In This Episode:[02:10] Innovation is the cornerstone of what Tech Transfer professionals do. It's also the cornerstone of human development in general. It's our nature to seek new and improved ways of putting ideas into action.[03:02] Innovation hasn't always received the scholarly focus that it deserves. Yet, technology is everywhere. There are 250,000 patents in our cell phone alone.[05:02] Today we're going to talk about Technology Transfer in the role of innovation in Technology Transfer.[05:16] The distinction between invention and innovation. Inventions are solutions to problems. Innovation is a commercially successful use of invention.[06:22] The starting point is an invention disclosure.[08:06] We chop up the invention disclosure in different segments and plug it into an assessment knowledge canvas. [08:32] There are three broad categories to understanding innovation: understanding the innovation, the classification of the innovation, and additional details broken into 10 different subparts.[09:32] We want to take the innovation from the point the inventor has given us to commercializing.[10:14] Four kinds of patent protection including process, composition of matter, articles of manufacture, and machines.[11:23] Classification also has four classes including sustaining, discontinuous, disruptive, and breakthrough technologies.[12:16] Disruptive is critical, because it's the one that creates new markets.[13:36] Tech Transfer professionals have a lot of responsibility with categorizing the Invention from the beginning and making sure that it has a value proposition.[14:11] Crucial mindset for academic researchers to foster innovation. Academics are moving from doing the research and sharing knowledge to research that has an impact on society.[17:35] There are translational researchers who love working in the translational space. They can be used as ambassadors to coach the next generation. Education about the process and benefits of tech transfer is crucial for innovation.[19:32] Joy shares some personal experiences that highlight the power of mindset when it comes to innovation.[21:19] The story of a keyboard developed on glass which was meant for people with disabilities. The inventors were able to sell the patent for this to Steve Jobs and it was integrated into the iPhone.[23:03] The impact and passion that these inventors had led to success.[24:28] A nurse who developed a wearable simulation device for training healthcare practitioners was so passionate that it became a startup called Avkin that makes wearable simulators.[25:56] Johns Hopkins University is one of the oldest universities established in 1876. It was also one of the first universities to have research as a component. They now do $3.4 billion dollars of research. They get more than 400 disclosures a year.[27:21] The Tasty Tape is a tape that holds a burrito together. It's simple and yet it was complicated. Hopkins also developed the targeted real-time early morning system or TREWS. [28:41] Saccharin, rubber gloves used by surgeons, and the smart tissue autonomous robot STAR have been developed by Johns Hopkins.[29:41] Exciting trends in academic transfer that boost innovation include integrated technology in the process. The world's getting smaller and everything's at a global scale.[32:11] There's an increased focus of interdisciplinary research not just in the US but globally. Universities are also developing consortium models. There's also a growing emphasis on entrepreneurship and startup culture.[35:07] Practical steps to create a culture that encourages and awards innovation amongst faculty and researchers. They need to be treated with a little TLC, because they do multi-functional work with education and research. We also need to continue to educate the faculty members.[38:53] Emerging trends and technology shaping the future include AI and machine learning. Other emerging trends include cybersecurity, biotechnology, genomic space, and personalized medicine, and CRISPR technology. [40:23] 3D printing, electronics, healthcare, energy manufacturing and data science are also sectors to watch.[41:24] Things are going to become more complicated and sophisticated as we move forward.Resources: Joy Goswami, Senior Director of Corporate Engagement at Johns Hopkins UniversityJoy Goswami LinkedInJoy Goswami TwitterPartners in Discovery: Unlocking the Potential of Research Collaborations With Gaylene Anderson

Let’s take a deep dive into innovation in the health sector and the role that university research plays in this sector. Joining us today is Richard Gannotta, a seasoned healthcare executive with a remarkable career spanning top academic and public health systems. From leading UC Irvine Health to shaping policy at NYC Health + Hospitals, Rick's expertise is unparalleled. As managing partner of Washington Square Advisors, he continues to drive innovation in the medtech and biotech industries. He's also a dedicated educator at NYU and the host of the Healthcare Nation podcast.In this episode, we explore the future of healthcare and technological development. We'll explore how telehealth is transforming patient care, the groundbreaking potential of AI in medicine, and the critical role of intellectual property in driving innovation. We'll also discuss the evolving landscape of healthcare delivery, the impact of new technologies like wearables, and the policies needed to support this exciting transformation. Join us as we uncover the trends shaping the future of health and wellness. In This Episode:[02:16] Rick shares his amazing career journey. According to Rick, he's just a kid from Brooklyn who caught a couple of good breaks along the way.[02:46] He's always been interested in technology, science, and medicine.[03:17] He ended up dropping out of high school and becoming a nurse's aide and then an LPN. This was a big break for him. It eventually led to nursing school, becoming a nurse practitioner, and getting a degree. He now has an MBA and a doctorate in healthcare policy.[04:33] Starting out working at the bedside was invaluable information for his further career. He's also always taught academically. His firm Washington Square Advisors is a boutique firm navigating the intricacies of the healthcare sector.[06:26] Career paths aren't linear. They can have many twists and turns.[06:54] Rick believes that technology is the new biology. It will be equally important for the health and wellness of society and individuals.[08:03] Validating ideas and whether the innovation is addressing the issue.[10:17] Three Factor Framing. There are three factors that are the key components of disruptive innovations. The first Factor F1 is really market eligibility or ideation. Is there demand?[12:14] F2 is the governing process. The environmental gating conditions that would slow things down or speed them up.[12:56] F3 is the out of field variable or the X factor. It's an approach or technology commonly used in a different sector.[14:05] These can be applied to idea generation, brainstorming and more.[16:15] Rick talks about Telehealth and AI revolutionizing healthcare. There are incredible opportunities to change the game.[18:02] Rick predicts a convergence of The Internet of Things and medical technology.[20:14] The first rule at Washington Square Advisors is to seek to understand your client's challenges. Work closely with the teams to understand the philosophy.[23:18] Rick talks about navigating IP challenges working with startups in the healthcare sector. It's essential to secure your patent early.[27:44] Governmental policies are very important when you're thinking about startups.[28:19] Can we make healthcare better, more convenient, and more accessible using technology? Another big issue is the medical professional shortage.[32:46] Strategies for tech transfer offices include having strong relationships with industry partners, having your finger on the pulse of what's happening, and understanding the resources that you need to provide.[34:33] Partnership agreements and joint ventures make a lot of sense.[35:16] Pitfalls include not fully understanding or underestimating hurdles such as regulatory issues. Inadequate market understanding, fit, and validation are also concerns that need to be addressed.[36:43] All of the processes begin with education.[37:47] Rick's advice includes focusing on understanding the real clinical need and the why.Resources: Richard Gannotta NYU WagnerRichard Gannotta LinkedInHealthcare Nation Podcast

Navigating the intricacies of university-industry partnerships is more important than ever in an era when colleges increasingly see their intellectual property portfolios as attractive sources of prospective revenue. Today, I'm thrilled to have Donald Siegel join us to talk about university-industry partnerships, as described in his book The Chicago Handbook of University Technology Transfer and Academic Entrepreneurship.Don is a Foundation Professor of Public Policy and Management at Arizona State University and Co-Director of the Global Center for Technology Transfer. With a remarkable career that includes serving as Dean of the School of Business at the University at Albany, SUNY, and editing prominent journals such as the Journal of Technology Transfer, he has unrivaled knowledge of university technology transfer and academic entrepreneurship.Don and his co-editors have prepared a thorough guidebook that synthesizes cutting-edge research and gives critical insights from experts across many fields. Today, we'll look at key themes from the book, including the evolution of technology transfer, intellectual property management systems, and how to foster an entrepreneurial culture within universities.In This Episode:[02:14] All of the authors are academics that have been studying Tech Transfer. They've seen the field evolve as an academic field. It's a global phenomenon and people in multiple disciplines have been studying this field.[03:06] They decided to approach the University of Chicago Press and pitch their idea. It was a difficult sale, because they've never done a handbook or anything on tech transfer.[04:36] It's a collection of leading edge research on the topic.[05:04] One of the chapters is an entrepreneur's guide to the university. Open innovation is one of the important concepts.[06:40] One of the major changes that Don has seen are people with business and entrepreneurial experience in the Tech Transfer office.[07:39] They've moved beyond licensing and patenting with a greater focus on entrepreneurship. [09:22] There's also a much greater appreciation of the role of technology and economic development.[11:20] Don talks about how AUTM has changed and how they have more real world professionals with business experience. There's a strong entrepreneurial component to what Tech Transfer does.[12:44] Tech Transfer offices also play a very important role in educating faculty and administrators about the value of Tech Transfer.[15:01] Social returns to basic research maximize the value to the economy and society.[16:55] Tech Transfer offices are under resourced. One of the problems is stakeholders don't understand the value.[19:39] Don talks about using business school students to get engaged with Tech Transfer.[26:20] We need to hire university leaders that value Tech Transfer and understand how important it is.[28:10] Prosocial Tech Transfer and defined ways of measuring it. Interviewing and surveying faculty to understand what motivates them.[30:53] Psychological issues and the importance of champions and leadership. Tech Transfer role models are important.[36:47] How there is a larger interest in Tech Transfer abroad. There's a much stronger international presence.[42:09] Immediate actions include more successful marketing of Tech Transfer within the university. The responsibility falls on the leaders. Academic entrepreneurship and messaging.[44:39] It's also been difficult to get minorities interested in Tech Transfer as a profession. [47:37] The three key takeaways that Don would like to highlight includes whoever manages the university needs to think of Tech Transfer as a major strategic issue.[48:58] Tech Transfer strategy asking whether it's a priority. Set institutional goals and priorities. [49:28] If it is a priority, the resources should reflect that.[50:16] Which modes of tech transfer should be stressed? How should it be rewarded?[53:39] Strategies for stressing startups.Resources: Donald Siegel ASUThe Chicago Handbook of University Technology Transfer and Academic EntrepreneurshipVentureWell

Have you ever thought of storytelling as a powerful business tool? In the fast-paced world of tech transfer and startups, it absolutely is. Today's episode dives deep into the importance of storytelling – what it is and how it can be your secret weapon.  We'll be joined by Otto Pohl, a storytelling guru with a fascinating career path. Otto's a former journalist published in major publications, a seasoned entrepreneur with four startups under his belt, and a communications expert for startups. He now uses his unique blend of skills to help universities translate their groundbreaking research into successful products with real-world impact.Curious about the magic of storytelling in business? We'll learn how Otto helps tech transfer offices craft compelling narratives that resonate with investors, partners, and anyone who needs to understand the incredible work happening at universities. But storytelling isn't just about making things sound good. We'll also explore the line between a captivating pitch and empty promises. Otto will share his insights on the Pohl Pyramid and other powerful tools to ensure your story is not just exciting, but honest and builds genuine interest. Get ready to unlock the power of storytelling in your business! We'll discuss Otto's amazing career journey, the science behind why stories resonate, and common mistakes to avoid. This episode is packed with actionable tips and insights you won't want to miss.In This Episode:[02:09] Career rewrites and how journalism and entrepreneurship fit into one bucket for Otto. [02:43] After college, he moved to Russia to work as a photojournalist. He was a New York Times Bureau photographer. [03:17] He also discovered so many business opportunities that he quit his job to found three companies in Moscow.[03:34] He rotated between entrepreneurship and journalism moving to several different countries.[04:11] We learn how stories and business meet each other.[06:21] Storytelling is deeper and bigger and more intertwined with everything we do than most of us realize. It fundamentally creates connections between events.[07:37] From a business perspective, the story explains why your company has meaning.[10:54] Storytelling and the startup context or pitching. Where is the line between vision and delusion?[12:05] When we pitch something it's a story about what we think we can make happen.[13:11] Lying about what you already have is called fraud.[13:35] transfer professionals need to figure out what their technology can do in their portfolio and make sure there's a story about how this thing can change the world, but do it in a way that you feel will pan out.[14:17] Otto breaks down what good storytellers do well.[15:05] Focus on the why.[15:31] Otto talks about the Pohl pyramid or multi-layer of why. A good storyteller knows which level of why they want to address.[16:54] Tech transfer professionals should care about storytelling because it will help them create a better impact.[19:05] Shining the light on your invention allows the pyramid of benefits to cascade and unfold.[20:03] Otto shares examples of how finding and telling the right story and why your research matters has helped tech transfer offices. [26:46] The story is what makes a new company and its product sparkle.[27:09] Otto shares how to communicate with different stakeholders. Work from the result backwards.[29:45] Common mistakes tech transfer offices and early stage startups make with storytelling. The academic mindset and the business mindset aren't always on the same page.[32:39] Storytelling is still a caveman exercise satisfying fundamental human needs.[36:08] Storytelling isn't bad, we need to shift to a customer mindset, and embrace business not academic communications.Resources: Otto PohlOtto Pohl Core CommunicationsOtto Pohl LinkedInSapiens: A Brief History of HumankindPromote your TTO more Effectively” – August 13, 2024 – 12 pm ESTThank you Scorpius BioManufacturing for sponsoring this episode of AUTM on the Air. Learn more at: scorpiusbiologics.com

Imagine a future where innovation knows no boundaries—where groundbreaking ideas emerge from every corner of society, regardless of race, gender, or economic background. This isn't just a dream; it's the bold vision driving the Council for Inclusive Innovation, or CI2. Fresh on the scene and launched by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, CI2 is spearheading a revolution in how we approach creativity and invention from historically underrepresented and under-resourced communities.Join us as we explore the heart of CI2's mission with our special guest, Louis Boston, associate counsel for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the acting director of CI2. Louis's impressive career is marked by a dedication to expanding American innovation through diversity. He also serves as the USPTO’s Senior Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Officer.He is a graduate of the Washington College of Law and a former Student Bar Association President. Louis earned an LL.M. with a specialty in contract and fiscal law from the U.S. Army Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School. He received his B.A. in political science from The Johns Hopkins University.Commissioned through a four-year ROTC scholarship, Louis received an education delay to attend law school. After completing law school, he served nearly 12 years in the U.S. Judge Advocate General’s Corps. Louis is a decorated Iraq combat veteran and received numerous awards and decorations including the Bronze Star Medal and the Combat Action Badge.Listen in as Louis shares the mission of CI2, and the exciting initiatives underway to ensure that every American has the opportunity to contribute to and benefit from innovation.In This Episode:[02:37] CI2, pronounced CI squared, is charged for strategizing new ways to expand American innovation by tapping into the strength of our nation's diversity and increasing opportunities for all Americans to participate.[03:44] Louis explains the 2018 Success Act that had a report for Congress that identified the representation of under-represented groups in the patent system. They recommended a creation of a high-level Council of Industry tasked with increasing the amount of underrepresented groups involved with innovation.[05:00] CI2 strategies includes seven initiatives including the Diversity Innovation Platform. The DI platform is a free easy to use tool that shares diversity data within an innovation ecosystem.[06:22] There's also an innovation intern program. They also have a first-time filer expedited examination program.[08:04] Louis talks about the community outreach campaign.[09:59] The role of partnerships CI2 includes representatives from a variety of different sectors including private industry, non-profit organizations, academia, and federal agencies.[11:42] Advice for universities looking to engage with CI2 or other initiatives. [12:53] Louis shares ways where everybody can get involved in your own community to help the initiative.[13:51] The Patent Practitioners Pro Bono Program builds on the work of the Biden Administration to open the doors to innovation across the country. Meeting people where they are is key to expanding participation in the ecosystem.[17:42] Louis looks into the future and shares long-term goals for CI2 and how he sees the council of all being in the coming years.[19:03] Actionable steps to foster innovation. We need to get the word out and share how IP is relevant in our daily lives.Thank you Scorpius BioManufacturing for sponsoring this episode of AUTM on the Air. Learn more at: scorpiusbiologics.comResources: Council for Inclusive Innovation (CI2)CI2@uspto.govDiscovering Value: Women’s Participation In University And Commercial AI InventionNew USPTO study finds women’s participation in patenting associated with substantial economic valueNational Strategy for Inclusive Innovation

Have you ever wondered how groundbreaking scientific discoveries make their way from the lab to the marketplace? Today, we're diving deep into the intricacies of working with industry partners, negotiating deals, managing strategic research alliances, and driving external collaborations.Joining us today is Gaylene Anderson, who brings a wealth of knowledge and experience to the table. As Boehringer Ingelheim's US Director for Strategic Research Relationships, Gaylene is responsible for forging partnerships and pathways for external collaboration with the US Research Organization, leveraging both internal synergies and engagement with external scientific partners.Throughout her career, Gaylene has been a champion of economic development and entrepreneurship, creating over a dozen startups and staying focused on developing relationships with investor groups and business development colleagues nationwide. In our conversation, we'll explore creating and managing partnerships, identifying scientific partners, training and support programs for researchers, and more. In This Episode:[02:26] If Gaylene had it to do over again, she would spend more time with the scientists to understand their world more.[05:17] She would also spend more time on the front end before engaging with a partner. [09:44] Tech transfer professionals should sit down with their directors and explain how they want to maximize and have the best results possible. Success breeds success.[14:06] Before working with external partners, Gaylene has to get organized internally. She works with the scientists and department heads to understand their research needs first.[19:30] Strategies or programs developed to foster entrepreneurship and bridge the gap to industry. She asked the dean for students interested in commercialization. She then coached these students and entered them in business competitions. [25:12] When securing funding and investor engagement, you have to go where the opportunities and investors are. [30:00] Budgetwise, maximize what you can. Once you have some success the money will be found to do more. [33:39] Gaylene shares some of her experiences at Cleveland Clinic and other institutions. [36:54] Invite tech transfer colleagues to your meetings, including them will improve your deal flow and collaborations.[37:41] Emerging trends and shifts include people realizing that you have to be more than a licensing expert. They need to be collaboration experts.[41:34] Common misconceptions or pitfalls when working with industry partners that tech transfer professionals should be aware of include remembering your relationships and reputation are everything. Treat each other with respect and realize not everyone knows and understands the entire contract.[45:41] Find ways to create relationships with industry partners. Make an effort to build relationships because these contacts will be important for you someday.Resources: Gaylene AndersonGaylene Anderson LinkedInScorpius BiologicsScorpius Biologics is a sponsor of this episode.

Have you ever wondered what truly goes into the commercialization of a patented invention? Today we're exploring an often misunderstood aspect of tech transfer: the strategic licensing of know-how.Know-how encompasses the vital information necessary or beneficial for the commercialization of a patented invention. While a patent license combines aspects of both federal and state law, a know-how license is governed solely by state law, as it lacks federal statutory protection.To guide us through this intricate subject, we have Wes Blakeslee with us. Wes holds an Engineering Degree from Penn State University and a Law Degree from the University of Maryland School of Law. With over 15 years of experience at The Johns Hopkins University as an Associate General Counsel and later as Executive Director of Technology Transfer, Wes is a seasoned expert in intellectual property and business law. A Certified Licensing Professional, he is a frequent speaker at conferences and a consultant on intellectual property and business matters.Join us as we dive deep into the complexities and strategic importance of know-how licensing with Wes Blakeslee.In This Episode:[01:45] Wes was an engineer with NASA before he became a lawyer. In 1982, he acquired a client that does research and development for the government. There are no patents for classified technology, so that's how he was introduced to "know-how" licensing. [03:34] It means something you know that others don't. Know-how must be protected like a trade secret with steps taken to protect it. [04:52] You don't want to patent a trade secret, because the records are public. Patented licenses can include "know-how". [07:31] Describing "know-how" can include specifications. There's no specific protection for "know-how", so you have to describe the "know-how" and what it can and can't be used for. There are confidentiality provisions.[09:24] Drafting a non-exclusive license for "know-how" is more simple than a non-exclusive license. It's critical in an exclusive license to make sure that you still have the right to use the information yourself. You have to be careful to define the field.[12:19] The "know-how" license looks a lot like a patent license, except for the extra terms you have to know, and that there's no general legal protection.[13:50] Describing the nature of the deal without releasing specifics. Process and product know-how licensing agreement.[16:24] A lot of "know-how" is process-oriented and gets licensed on an annual basis.[18:31] The goal of the negotiation is to give the other side everything they need, while preserving for your client everything that they need.[22:00] Common obstacles include teaching them what they need without teaching them everything you know. [26:49] Wes talks about the licensing for non-profits and hospitals. [29:28] Almost every academic license will have a patent and "know-how" in the license.[35:17] There should be discussion of "know-how" in the advanced licensing course. AUTM is a great resource! Licensing Executives Society is also a good resource. Resources: Wes Blakeslee WebsiteWes Blakeslee LinkedInLicensing Executives Society

Have you ever wondered what really powers the success of tech transfer offices at universities? It’s not just the groundbreaking research or innovative technologies—it’s the relationships behind the scenes.In today’s episode, we’re highlighting the importance of cultivating strong relationships with faculty members. These connections not only facilitate technology disclosures but also significantly boost the marketing reach and appeal of research to industry partners.Joining us to shed light on this topic is David McClure, the Managing Director of Licensing at the Office of Research Commercialization, Texas Tech University System. David brings a wealth of experience and insight into why fostering strong faculty relationships is essential for the success of a tech transfer office.We’ll be discussing effective strategies for initiating and maintaining engagement with faculty, the challenges and nuances of making tough decisions about researchers' inventions, and the best communication practices for managing expectations. Plus, we’ll explore how relationship-building can be seamlessly integrated into these efforts.In This Episode:[01:21] The importance of strong relationships with faculty for tech transfer success. We have to create a system of mutual trust where each of us will do our respective jobs.[02:27] No invention has ever been licensed without the full support of the researcher. The feedback is very important for success.[04:03] The key is communication. When an invention disclosure comes in it gets assigned to a licensee manager and they carry it through until a license is negotiated. Making the process transparent and showing every step to a faculty member along the way.[05:21] They make decisions on new inventions in 60 days, but they try to do it in 30 days.[06:48] Outsourcing assessments to a third party makes the researchers feel like everyone's on the same team.[08:45] Maintaining engagement is important. They get a list of new faculty hires. They give them a visit and ask what they are interested in and establish a relationship from day one. [13:42] Communicating every step along the way is an effective communication strategy. Showing your work and letting the researchers know what you're doing on their behalf is very helpful.[15:02] They also use LinkedIn as a success story communication tool.[19:48] They make it easy and affordable for faculty members to license their technology. The industry appreciates customer validation.[21:03] It takes years to get a patent issued and to take a technology to market. It's a long process where you should take as many shots as possible. David and his team preach patience to new faculty members. They also use colleague examples to demonstrate the process.[22:52] The role of training and professional development in preparing TTO staff and faculty for successful collaboration and commercialization. David tries to get them plugged into the ecosystem as quickly as possible.[27:21] How strong faculty relationships impact the overall success and growth of a tech transfer office in the long term.[28:12] Advice for tech transfer professionals includes critical management and building a portfolio over time. Start small and build over time. Show your work. Be patient. Resources: David McClure Texas Tech UniversityDavid McClure LinkedIn

Industry-University Partnerships are crucial for fostering innovation, addressing societal challenges, and driving economic growth. By working together, universities and industries can leverage their unique strengths to create solutions that benefit society as a whole. Today, I'm excited to be joined by an amazing panel of guests, Dr. Gayathri Srinivasan, Shahila Christie, and John D. Wilson, to discuss taking a holistic approach to these partnerships.Dr. Gayathri Srinivasan is the Executive Director of MIT Corporate Relations, a position she has held since the beginning of February 2024. As Executive Director, Gayathri leads the growth of the Industrial Liaison Program (ILP) and the Startup Exchange, building on a roster of over 200 member companies and forging impactful connections between global business leaders and MIT faculty.John D. Wilson is the Director of Academic Contracting at GlaxoSmithKline. John's responsibilities include aligning industrial and academic research to ensure that science, technology, and people collaborate to benefit scientific development. John sits within a research externalization group that liaisons with all research units and therapeutic areas across his organization, as well as globally.Shahila Christie began her career in academic research focusing on small molecule drug discovery and development. Recognizing the potential for commercialization, Shahila transitioned to the entrepreneurial space by co-founding a spin-off company leveraging her research. She has consulted for university-based startups and led clinical efforts for a medical diagnostics company in oncology. In her current role at Portal Innovations, she supports the growth and development of early-stage life science technologies.I’m excited to have Gayathri, Shahila, and John with us today to talk about these crucial partnerships. In This Episode:[03:02] Holistic Industry University partnership is looking at the entire Institute and enterprise for the collaboration. Research, innovation, students, and education.[05:25] It represents a collaborative effort that spans beyond the simple technology licensing. It's a multifaceted approach that is designed to nurture.[06:30] Approaching things as a good partner who wants to collaborate and develop science is critical.[07:19] Identifying common goals is key for collaboration. Understanding where partners are looking for opportunities and what the challenges are is very important.[09:56] When addressing significant societal challenges for the public good. look at what your company is good at and what the academic is good at and be proactive about reaching out and solving the issues.[12:09] It's important to be proactive, not reactive.[13:58] Industries are well versed in knowing where the market needs are. Universities should tap into this space to leverage their capabilities and drive Innovation forward.[16:43] The expertise is in the academic centers and pharma is really good at developing drugs. Cutting-edge technology is coming out of academic centers and working together is the best choice for creating new drugs and solutions.[21:23] Startups in the university ecosystem are so important for this type of development.[24:01] Best practices for creating and maintaining communication during these crucial partnerships.[25:33] Having a dedicated point person to champion between the two institutions is key.[27:53] Looking for ways to leverage federal money, university input, and matching dollars from industry to develop future scientists.[30:44] Look at societal problems and which Industries and companies are suited to solve those problems. [34:03] We talk about sharing information to develop better technology. [34:42] Shahila talks about how VC firms analyze investment opportunities. They evaluate university partnerships through a multifaceted lens that includes assessing the technology's potential and the university's tech transfer capabilities.[36:45] VC firms play a vital role in bridging the gap between university technologies and their successful commercializations.[39:17] Key considerations for pharma companies evaluating partnerships include alignment.[44:33] For large societal questions, large partnerships and collaborations will be the answer. Government support, university research and innovation, industry collaboration and support, and the market.[45:54] Science is moving quickly and entering a transformative era. Rapid innovation is driving pharma to look more at early stage technology.[47:11] If the academic industry and VC work together, there will be an exponential increase in our capabilities.Resources: Dr. Gayathri Srinivasan Executive Director of MIT Corporate RelationsDr. Gayathri Srinivasan LinkedInJohn D. Wilson, MS, RTTP LinkedInShahila Christie LinkedIn

We are focusing on innovation, organizational growth, and the commercialization of emerging technologies with a very special guest, Pam Henderson, a renowned author, entrepreneur, CEO, and expert in business and innovation strategy.As the founder of NewEdge, a growth strategy firm, Pam leads the charge in identifying and anchoring growth opportunities. Her extensive experience spans both academia and industry, with her work featured in prestigious outlets like the Wall Street Journal, Harvard Business Review, and NPR.This is a wonderful episode for anyone with an entrepreneurial mindset. We learn how Pam’s academic work eventually led to her establishing NewEdge. She also developed the opportunity thinking approach, which involves getting clear on how ideas will serve the market. We learn about defining what an opportunity is and more about turning an idea into a strategic business opportunity.In This Episode:[01:29] Pam's journey from academia to founding NewEdge. She began as a professor for Carnegie Mellon. She was invited to help commercialize early stage technologies which eventually led to Pam founding NewEdge. [03:03] Pam developed the opportunity thinking approach. A lot of ideas don't land in the market. Getting clear on how our ideas will serve the market leads to better ideas.[04:32] Defining opportunity first increases the odds for success. We get excited about ideas, but defining the broader opportunity gives us ideas about what will actually work.[05:22] You have to define what an opportunity is.[07:06] Get clear on the need, way to create value, and conditions. [08:38] Opportunity Thinking™ taps into six sources: market forces, business models, technology, organizations, environments, and design. Before the iPod, there were digital ways of gathering up music. [09:33] Apple created a business model that allowed us to get singular songs as opposed to entire albums. The larger opportunity was to build out the success of these different sources.[10:53] Sometimes we need to take a step back and go slow to go fast. Look at the opportunity and then build the technologies accordingly.[11:27] Pam shares an example of an innovation partnership that led to cooling shirts made from coconut polymer fibers. [15:25] Harley-Davidson's first electric vehicle. Staying true to the opportunity leads to bigger ideas in the market.[17:16] We learn about the voice of the ecosystem. [20:07] Common strategies companies face when trying to implement opportunity thinking and how to overcome them.[22:43] People confuse risk aversion with uncertainty aversion. We can work on uncertainty aversion by getting people more familiar with opportunities.[24:15] Pam talks about the importance of culture. Working on culture is one of the things that has made her the most proud in her organization.[25:06]  A consultant really helped them identify their values. Make your values interesting and true to who you are. They love people who are driven and continually improving. Other values include team first and grounded provocateurs. Teachable trust builders or being a teacher and a learner at all times.[28:46] Co-innovation is one of the emerging trends companies should take notice of. Companies are going to need to collaborate more to make big changes.Resources: Pam Henderson NewEdgeNewEdgePam Henderson LinkedInKilling Ideas - You can kill an idea, you can't kill an opportunity

I’m thrilled to have Levi C. Maaia and Noah Mark to talk about the Pathways to Invention documentary. Noah Mark is the President of Maaia Mark Productions and Levi is the Director of the film. This 60-minute documentary explores the age-old question of whether inventors are born or made. Through up-close profiles, it highlights the impactful contributions of inventors across various disciplines, including biotech, medical diagnostics and prosthetics, sustainable agriculture, food production, software development, and materials science.All featured inventors are recipients of the prestigious Lemelson-MIT Student Prize. In this film, Levi and Noah uncover the journeys of inventors across various fields, shedding light on the pathways to creativity, resilience, and success.This documentary was produced by Maaia Mark Productions in association with the Lemelson-MIT Program, with funding from The Lemelson Foundation, MIT's School of Engineering, and the University of California at Berkeley.In our conversation, Levi and Noah share the inspiration for the documentary, common traits of inventors, and how education can foster young minds. We also discuss the significant challenges inventors have overcome, the recurring theme of collaboration and mentorship, and how the inventors were chosen to showcase. Additionally, we explore how personal experiences shape an inventor's journey, how technology has made inventing more accessible, and the intersection of invention and social impact.In This Episode:[02:22] Noah and Levi were curious about people's ability to shape the world around them and the maker movement.[03:09] They were inspired by all of the makers in Cuba who have no choice but to be innovative because of the embargo.[04:06] The idea changed to a broader lens about inventors from coast to coast in the US. [05:02] All of the inventors in the film were at some point recipients of the prestigious Lemelson-MIT Student Prize.[07:00] The goal was to demystify the term inventor. In real life, it's usually a team effort. Many attempts and failures are also involved.[08:06] The story of invention is really a story of overcoming failures and embracing them.[09:02] Are inventors born or made? A little bit of both. There has to be Spark. An inventor needs to be a self-starter who sees a problem and wants to solve it.[10:01] Inventors do need a supportive environment and resources.[12:53] Pig crushing is the number one challenge faced for pork producers. The solution was to create a wearable alarm for the mother.[16:21] Many of the inventions are in very diverse areas and they don't have to be a tech application.[16:53] Collaboration and mentorship. Fostering or creating a network will lead to innovation.[18:11] We talk about partnerships and recycling plastics on a smaller scale. Noah and Mark share how they love the resilience featured in this story. [20:02] Nicole Black from inspiration from her own story with hearing loss. Personal experience has a profound impact on an inventor's journey.[22:31] Two of their inventors were using machine learning at the time. [24:23] They were surprised by how much perseverance is required to bring something to fruition.[29:03] You have to be open to failing and confident to learn.[31:02] Innovation driving positive change in society. We can innovate and solve the challenges of the future.[33:00] There is no problem that is too overwhelming to attempt to solve.[35:55] They are also working on a series about innovators. Allowing hopeful optimistic people who want to make the world a better place a way to connect with each other.Resources: Pathways to InventionLevi C. MaaiaLevi C. Maaia LinkedInNoah Mark IMDBNoah Mark on X

Global Entrepreneur in Residence Programs are revolutionizing the startup world by providing crucial support to international founders. We'll discuss the impact of these programs to enable immigrants to innovate and become entrepreneurs and founders in the US startup space. I'm thrilled to be joined by Steve Tobocman for this discussion. Steve is a leader in community and economic development, with a special focus on immigrant inclusion. Since 2010, he's been the executive director of Global Detroit, an organization dedicated to driving growth and prosperity in Detroit and Southeast Michigan through immigrant-inclusive strategies. Before his work at Global Detroit, Steve served as an elected representative in Michigan's State House. There, he championed initiatives to support immigrant communities, including legislation to protect immigrants from exploitation and advocating for equitable access to education and services. In addition to his leadership roles, Steve is a partner at New Solutions Group, LLC, a Detroit-based consulting firm. He also co-directs the Michigan Political Leadership Program at Michigan State University. Steve holds a Juris Doctor from the University of Michigan Law School and a Master's in Public Policy from UM’s Ford School of Public Policy.In This Episode:[02:09] Global Entrepreneur Residence Programs are a solution to America's immigration laws which don't include a startup visa.  These programs connect founders with part-time employment at or by universities so they can get an uncapped H-1B visa. [03:34]  A variety of STEM founders take an H-1B job and then work on their startup outside of this job. The time in the program is as short or as long as they need to advance their startup or company.[04:17] This levels the playing field for American innovation. It allows early stage startups to be launched here from all over the world.[04:52] The first program started in 2014, at University of Massachusetts Boston. In the first 10 years, they supported 81 founders who raised 1.5 billion in venture capital.[05:20] There's about 10 programs. The program at Global Detroit has worked at about six different universities. More programs are also planned to be launched in the future.[05:49] Global Detroit started in 2010. It was a vision of the philanthropic community. Funders pooled resources as the new economy initiative.[06:27] They wanted to leverage and harness the economic driver of immigration.[07:37] Over the last 15 years, they've seen a variety of new players in the immigration space that interact with economic development.[07:54] These are local economic development agencies that realize that immigrants are important to the US economy.[08:37] Global Detroit is a leader in the Global Entrepreneur in Residence Programs.[09:11]  72% of all the electrical engineering students in America are international students.[10:03] Steve talks about Chening Duker, a computer science student from Ghana and Britain who worked for a startup, before starting his own and launching Goodpluck, a startup that brings the freshest produce to your door. [14:11] The biggest challenge has been lack of awareness.[18:20] Steve talks about the role of these programs to attract talent. California and other states are trying to adopt the model. There's a lot of growth. The programs have created a competitive advantage for Michigan. [21:14] Key considerations for tech transfer offices to leverage these programs include keeping in mind that International students contribute disproportionately to the ecosystem.[26:04] Navigating the complexities to provide support for international founders. Read The Startup Visa or contact Global Detroit. [27:39] These programs not only provide a Visa they also provide other aspects of support. [34:21] The mission is to support the success of local programs. We believe America is stronger through immigration and robust integration.[39:58] A global EIR strategy is a strategy to build an innovation ecosystem and the startup community is critical to the future. We can always be the global design leader. Michigan is investing in the global EIR program. Resources: Steve Tobocman, Executive Director Global DetroitSteve Tobocman LinkedInGoodpluckThe Startup Visa: U.S. Immigration Visa Guide for Startups and Founders

We're diving into the world of intellectual property and technology transfer in Jamaica. Our special guest for this episode is Loreen Walker, a trailblazer in this field. Loreen played a crucial role in establishing the Jamaica Intellectual Property Office (JIPO) back in 2002, and she's here to share her wealth of experiences and insights with us.Loreen Walker is a distinguished Attorney-at-Law with over 40 years of experience. She has worked across the private sector, public sector, and academia, specializing in areas such as commercial, corporate, labor, pension, insurance, intellectual property, and sports law.In 2002, Loreen became the first Head of JIPO, collaborating closely with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to solidify JIPO's foundation. After her tenure at JIPO ended in 2005, she joined the Jamaica Coffee Industry Board (Regulatory Division), known for the world-famous Jamaica Blue Mountain® coffee. Loreen then moved to The University of the West Indies, where she advised on intellectual property and technology transfer matters. Now retired from the university, she is focused on developing tech transfer services for the Jamaican public.In this episode, we explore Loreen's journey into tech transfer, her leadership at JIPO, the challenges and strategies she encountered, and her advisory role at The University of the West Indies. We'll also discuss the unique opportunities and challenges that Caribbean nations, including Jamaica, face in commercializing intellectual property and fostering innovation-driven entrepreneurship.In This Episode:[02:28] Loreen shares how she got her start in tech transfer. She was exposed to tech transfer while head of the Jamaica Intellectual Property Office.[03:19] People in Jamaica and the Caribbean are very creative because of all of the different influences that they've had. She's always been interested in making that creativity work.[05:12] Before JIPO there were bits and pieces of IP protection through government offices. There were things like copyrights and trademarks.[06:37] Loreen talks about challenges getting JIPO up and running. In the early days, the knowledge gap was a huge problem. Working with WIPO helped close that gap.[07:54] Jamaica has only been a sovereign country since 1962. There were old colonial laws on the books. Getting the legislation in place for IP and tech transfer was challenging.[09:41] Effective strategies included utilizing the courses that WIPO offered.[12:59] It's also challenging to keep up with all the new changes including challenges brought about by AI.[14:18] Tech transfer is more than something that universities need to know about. As a small country, Jamaica needs to reach out to the people, because there are people who are doing innovative things.[18:26] There's a huge connection between innovation and entrepreneurship.[20:02] There's a lot of work being done in biotech on the medicine side and the agricultural side.[24:07] A big challenge is tapping into the global commercialization opportunities. Jamaica needs to consciously become a path of the global commercialization ecosystem.[25:46] They need to be seen as a company of products that can benefit society. [27:05] IP has always been seen as a very important area for the Caribbean and Jamaica.[28:39] IP is the new area of law that protects innovation and inventions. Resources need to be invested in the protection of IP.[29:37] In order to keep on top of things we have to accept that we have to be lifelong learners.[30:55] Another challenge is how each country has different laws about IP. We need to look at a more global IP system.[33:26] One of the most rewarding things for Loreen is establishing an organization that is growing and helping people. It's also being able to share and give advice.Resources: Loreen Walker AUTMJamaica Intellectual Property Office (JIPO)World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)Jamaica Blue Mountain® coffee

May is Mental Health Awareness Month, making it the perfect time to discuss mental health and neurodiversity in the workplace. We’ll explore the unique challenges and opportunities faced by neurodivergent individuals in traditional work environments. Neurodivergent individuals, including those with ADHD, autism spectrum disorder, dyslexia, and more, often face significant obstacles. From navigating social interactions to managing their mental health, these individuals encounter challenges that can impact their well-being and professional success. However, these challenges also present opportunities for growth and innovation. Neurodiverse individuals bring unique perspectives and skills, enriching workplaces with their creativity and problem-solving abilities.Joining us today are two experts, Ed Ergenzinger and Haley Moss, to discuss neurodiversity, mental health, and their integration into the workplace.Ed Ergenzinger is a patent lawyer, neuroscientist, and adjunct professor whose personal journey with bipolar disorder has shaped his advocacy for mental health awareness and education. After experiencing the challenges associated with bipolar disorder firsthand, Ed's resilience led him to return to law practice and become a vocal advocate for mental health. With over 20 years of experience in patent law and a deep understanding of neuroscience, he offers a unique perspective on neurodiversity and mental health in the workplace.Haley Moss is an attorney, author, and passionate advocate for neurodiversity and disability inclusion. Diagnosed with autism at three years old, Haley has become a leading voice in advocating for individuals with disabilities. Licensed to practice law in Florida, she focuses on speaking engagements, writing, and consulting to make workplaces more inclusive for people with disabilities. Through her books and articles, Haley sheds light on neurodiversity in professional settings, drawing from her own experiences to drive meaningful change.In This Episode:[03:16] Haley says that she got into advocacy by accident. She was asked by a university to speak on a panel when she was 13 years old. She agreed because the panel was in Orlando, Florida and she wanted to go to Disney World.[04:50] After speaking, she realized she was making a difference. She's now been advocating for neurodiversity for half of her life.[05:27] In 2019 and 2020, Ed had a severe manic episode that swung into a deep treatment resistant depression. He couldn't work. He lost his current position, and he was hospitalized.[06:16] When he got out of the hospital, he went on disability. The severe manic episode resulted in his bipolar I diagnosis. With the correct diagnosis, he could look back and see the cycles.[06:45] After getting out of depression and returning to work, Ed knew that it was important to tell his story and become involved in advocacy. He wanted to prevent stigma and prevent others from going through what he went through.[07:17] One size fits all policies are often the problem, not the solution to mental health in the workplace. Flexibility is key. [08:49] Better communication is also a solution. It's good to offer a mix of ways to connect. Provide context so information makes sense.[11:19] Knowing how to communicate is huge. It's also important to cultivate empathetic leadership.[13:48] Lawyer Assistance Programs help lawyers, judges, and law students who have struggles with mental health or substance abuse. We need to build resources that are non-judgmental and don't have stigma around them.[15:59] Some approaches for supporting mental health in the workplace include seminars and educational programs and appointing directors of well-being.[18:43] Neurodiverse individuals often have unique strengths. We need to support people without burning them out by holding them to reasonable and attainable goals.[24:04] Being flexible and dealing with each situation as it comes helps support neurodivergent individuals at work.[24:42] Accommodations organizations can make to address mental health needs include having mental health days as part of PTO and looking at specific needs for individuals.[27:40] It's important to advocate for yourself in seeking accommodations that will benefit you. Find your pain points and go from there.[34:50] Fostering culture and support for neurodiversity comes down to education and awareness.[38:31] Haley shares her journey towards self-acceptance.[45:41] Ed talks about fostering a culture of inclusivity where "masking" isn't necessary for neurodiverse individuals. Embrace the difference.[51:32] We've made strides in awareness and advocacy after the pandemic. There's also been an uptick in mental health advocacy initiatives. Telehealth has also expanded.[55:33] Some positive trends include the increase in education and advocacy. [59:22] Haley is looking forward to a time when the stigma is no longer there, and we don't even have to have these conversations. She wants to be at a point of understanding and inclusion.Resources: Ed ErgenzingerEd Ergenzinger LinkedInEd Ergenzinger XHaley MossHaley Moss InstagramHaley Moss FacebookHaley Moss XHaley Moss LinkedIn

Welcome to a very special milestone episode of AUTM on the Air! Today, we mark a significant moment – our 200th episode, and we're kicking off the celebration of AUTM's 50th anniversary.Over the past five decades, AUTM has been at the forefront of advancing technology transfer and innovation, bringing together professionals from academia, industry, and government to drive economic growth and societal impact. In this episode, we reflect on the remarkable journey of AUTM, from its early beginnings to the influential organization it is today.Joining us are two distinguished guests who have been integral in shaping AUTM's history: Teri Willey, past President of AUTM in 1996, and Stephen Atkinson, a past President of SUPA, the precursor to AUTM. Their leadership paved the way for many of the organization's transformative initiatives.It's an honor to have Teri and Stephen here to reflect on AUTM’s journey over the years. Let's dive into the conversation and explore the rich history of this incredible organization. In This Episode:[02:08] Stephen has worked extensively capturing the early days of AUTM.  He shares some background on how SUPA was founded and its initial objectives. [03:13] In the 1970s, there were a lot of leaders wondering about the usefulness of supporting basic research. [05:18] The Golden Fleece awards were about fleecing the taxpayers for frivolous things. The social sciences were a target for this.[06:12]  At the time, there was a lot of conversation on what they were getting out of the investment for research. [07:00] Millions of dollars were being spent on basic research and there needed to be a way to share with people what they were getting out of the investment.[09:47] Stephen went to a meeting at O'Hare Airport in 1975. The talks were all over the place about technology. This meeting was one of the most important parts of the beginning of SUPA (Society of University Patent Administrators).[12:50] When you join SUPA or AUTM, you get an amazing community. [16:58] Challenges come with visibility. Teri joined SUPA in 1985.[17:21] One of Teri's first challenges at Northwestern University was that a lot of faculty weren't interested. She had to explain that research matters and your innovation could be partnered with another company.[18:08] Resources were also another challenge. Everything was filed on paper.[21:45] Educational institutions thought they shouldn't be doing business with businesses.[22:09] Another challenge was approving the attorney fees. [23:22] When the name shift from SUPA to AUTM took place it raised the discussion. IP is critical, but it also needs to be managed to capture its value. Management is also being savvy about business development.[27:37] The name change was done in a very democratic way. [31:36] Strategic planning was part of creating the structure of AUTM and member guidelines. Teri wants to see more industry members than academic members to get better faster. [37:08] What makes a good tech transfer professional?[43:34] Teri talks about how the membership audit helped shape the organizations identity. Validation and having the ability to compare work were also valuable. Managing AI, knowing where AUTM should take the lead, and being able to partner are also important.[47:55] The community is one of the greatest achievements of AUTM.  Any product that has made it to the marketplace and benefited the public is a tremendous accomplishment. [53:31] It's important that these ideas reach the public and having a community is critical, because it takes a long time.Resources: Teri WilleyTeri Willey LinkedIn

Open science advocates for the openness of data, methods, and tools to make scientific research scalable and publicly accessible, with the goal of enhancing research and making it more accessible to a wider audience. Today, we're discussing the Year of Open Science and its implications for patenting, licensing, and technology transfer strategies. Recent mandates from federal agencies, along with a growing emphasis on transparency and collaboration, are profoundly transforming the landscape of scientific research and innovation.We are joined by Meghan Hayes, Associate Director of Business Development and Licensing at Carnegie Mellon University. Meghan plays a pivotal role in protecting and disseminating intellectual property arising from university research.We are also joined by Andrew Wichmann, Senior Intellectual Property and Licensing Manager for Digital Technology at Johns Hopkins Technology Ventures, or JHTV. Andrew is involved in patent strategy, open source strategy, technology transactions, and portfolio management at JHTV.In This Episode:[01:51] 2023 was deemed the Year of Open Science by the White House to ensure free, immediate, and equitable access to publicly funded research.[02:13] A memo was sent to federal agencies to update their public access policies to make data and other resources accessible.[03:09] Many people credit the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines to the sharing of information.[03:48] Meghan talks about patent protection and open source and finding strategies that work. We need to understand what open source code does and if any part is protected or needs to be shared openly. [06:11] Subject matter has an influence on the information shared. Data will be published faster. Source code and licensing also needs to be looked at. [09:33] Changes that intersect with traditional research terms and conditions like Bayh-Dole provisions.[13:03] We have established IP protections in place. We want to drive and foster innovation. There is no one proper strategy for dissemination. [14:24] The end game is for promoting innovation. [15:09] There are a lot more questions about open science requirements. There's also a slight impact on IP disclosure numbers. We can increase educational outreach. [17:09] Open source tools have made progress faster. It also makes licensing a code base more complicated. [20:06] This is another detail to be mindful of in the industry. It's also an opportunity to be more creative. There are also dual licensing models. [23:23] Misconceptions and misunderstandings include people thinking this will end technology as we know it. Open source has been around for years. It's not as new as people fear. [24:35] Metrics are going to have to evolve and adjust. [29:44] Proactive steps include open source being integrated for a long time, so the requirements don't feel that new. It's seen as a tech transfer win.[34:34] How the relationship between academic leadership and TTOs is evolving includes a needed shift in mindset and a role to educate on what is a tech transfer win and being open source. [36:00] John Hopkins recently made a large investment in the Artificial Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Institute.[37:15] Meghan and Andrew are optimistic about open source fostering scientific innovation.Resources: Meghan Hayes Center for Technology Transfer and Enterprise CreationMeghan Hayes LinkedIn2023 is the Year of Open ScienceJohns Hopkins Technology Ventures