CounterSpin

  https://media.blubrry.com/counterspin/content.blubrry.com/counterspin/CounterSpin261016.mp3 Right-click here to download this episode (“Save link as…”).   “Electrocution,” George Bellows (1917) Donald Trump has apparently called off plans to livestream an execution. It’s impossible to imagine that Trump—the guy who thought it was cute to post video of a tiger killing a man, video that international press had withheld out of human decency, followed by an AI-generated video of himself wrestling the tiger—did any of what anyone else would call introspection. The firing squad execution of Nidal Hasan is still set for December 3. About 7,000 people were executed in the US between 1900 and 1976, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, and some 1,700 people after 1976. The group recently described the “failed execution,” if you can take in those words, of Christa Pike, as unprecedented, and possibly changing the conversation around lethal injection—which we’ve been told to think of as the clinical, tidy way for the state to murder people. CounterSpin has spoken about the death penalty and the way it’s meted out. We hear again this week a conversation from 2014 with journalist Dahlia Lithwick, about the Oklahoma execution of Clayton Lockett, and one from 2020 with journalist Liliana Segura about the death penalty itself and media coverage of it. https://media.blubrry.com/counterspin/content.blubrry.com/counterspin/CounterSpin261016Executions.mp3   Also on the show: “But had she been drinking? And what about their futures?” Yes, they are the oldest, stalest, most hateful things said about women who are violently assaulted by men. And yet here we are. Again. CounterSpin spoke in 2016 with writer and activist Soraya Chemaly about the myriad costs of downplaying and misunderstanding domestic violence, and in 2021 with Women’s Equal Justice project director Jane Manning about the justice system’s failures. We’ll hear from them again today as well. An unfortunate understanding that the past is not even past, this week on CounterSpin. https://media.blubrry.com/counterspin/content.blubrry.com/counterspin/CounterSpin261016Domestic.mp3  

  https://media.blubrry.com/counterspin/content.blubrry.com/counterspin/CounterSpin261009.mp3 Right-click here to download this episode (“Save link as…”).   Fortune (9/13/26) This week on CounterSpin: When Fortune magazine is telling you “corporations are raking in cash, but American workers are reaping less and less of the rewards,” something is afoot. The not-notoriously capitalist-critical magazine reported recently on the measurable fact that working people in this country are taking home the smallest percentage of economic output since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began tracking it in 1947. And they didn’t try to separate that from the fact that, at the same time, corporate profits have, in their word, “exploded.” Simple acknowledgement is welcome, but how different would public conversation be if we always understood that the corporations corporate media lionize are getting to those wonderful profits by abjectly exploiting their employees—and those they won’t acknowledge as employees? Such that those workers still need government assistance to stay alive? And then the corporations attack government assistance? Can we talk about how this isn’t a sustainable model for a humane society? Terri Gerstein is a longtime labor watcher. She’s director of the NYU Wagner Labor Initiative, at NYU’s Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service. We hear from her this week on the show. https://media.blubrry.com/counterspin/content.blubrry.com/counterspin/CounterSpin261009Gerstein.mp3

  https://media.blubrry.com/counterspin/content.blubrry.com/counterspin/CounterSpin261002.mp3 Right-click here to download this episode (“Save link as…”).   Institute for Policy Studies This week on CounterSpin: It may sound awkward, but there’s a reason that some of us refer to the lethal attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon as “September 11, 2001.” It’s because those who have reference to a wider world know that “September 11”  is not a trademark the US has on meaningful horror. September 11, 1973, saw a coup d’etat in Chile, when military officers, directed by Augusto Pinochet, seized power from the democratically elected President Salvador Allende—and ushered in an era of devastating suppression of leftist opposition, including exile, torture and murder. The US saw Chile as a Cold War ally at the time—and so, while some will debate how much this country’s leadership actively, in real time, abetted the coup and the ensuing violence, or whether they just actively laid the ground for it and welcomed and supported it—that’s a distinction without a difference. The history is reactivated this time every year, when we acknowledge the political murders of Orlando Letelier and Ronni Moffitt—killed in a car bomb in Washington, DC, on September 21, 1976, while they were engaged in work at the Institute for Policy Studies, illuminating the abuses taking place in Pinochet’s Chile and their relationship to US actions and inactions. Some people will only be hearing about all of this now—50 years out—because at least one of the people identified as participating in the car bombing, a Cuban exile, is up for deportation. It seems worth underscoring that seeking accountability for the political murders directed by Pinochet does not require co-signing the Trump administration’s people-disappearing machinery—particularly as we know that will involve silencing things we need to hear, and that it is in no way in service to the kind of democratic life Chilean people were seeking with Allende’s election. We talk about the killing of Orlando Letelier and Ronni Moffitt with Sarah Anderson. She directs the Global Economy Program at the Institute for Policy Studies, and co-edits the site Inequality.org. https://media.blubrry.com/counterspin/content.blubrry.com/counterspin/CounterSpin261002Anderson.mp3   Plus Janine Jackson takes a quick look back at how media looked back at the “Global War on Terror.” https://media.blubrry.com/counterspin/content.blubrry.com/counterspin/CounterSpin261002Banter.mp3  

  https://media.blubrry.com/counterspin/content.blubrry.com/counterspin/CounterSpin260925.mp3 Right-click here to download this episode (“Save link as…”).   Verso Books (2022) This week on CounterSpin: Corporate media sell a lot of messages, but perhaps the overarching one is: This is how it is. You can be mad about it; we’ll give you a personal profile, maybe. But, hey, this is just how it is, and how it is: There were 34.5 million people living in poverty ​in 2025, according to the Census Bureau. The United States has the second-highest poverty rate among major developed nations in the OECD. Wait, you aren’t happy with that? Well, welcome to corporate media’s echo chamber—where you are naive at best. When people try to fight for something better, we get a lot of noise about how that can’t work, won’t work, and you know who else wanted social change? Communists! Socialists! The idea is that we will be frightened off from wanting healthcare because, you know what? Russia! The good news is that ever-increasing numbers of people just aren’t buying what elite media are selling—which is the same old, top-down, racist, “why would you even speak up?” blather that we’ve been listening to for decades. And then the narrating of the nightmare that we’re living through. It’s not that DSA—Democratic Socialists of America—are the answer. But ask yourself: Why won’t corporate media engage the questions they pose? We’ll hear from Raina Lipsitz, author of The Rise of a New Left: How Young Radicals Are Shaping the Future of American Politics, from Verso Books—and author of a range of pieces, including some on socialism, for FAIR.org. https://media.blubrry.com/counterspin/content.blubrry.com/counterspin/CounterSpin260925Lipsitz.mp3 Featured image: Photo by Janine Jackson of anti-Mamdani graffiti in Manhattan’s Chelsea.

  https://media.blubrry.com/counterspin/content.blubrry.com/counterspin/CounterSpin260918.mp3 Right-click here to download this episode (“Save link as…”).     Corporate Crime Reporter (8/3/26) This week on CounterSpin: FAIR, the nonprofit collective that produces CounterSpin, had a T-shirt early on that called for the “separation of press and state.” That’s still meaningful, of course, but it feels a little odd now to talk about media bias without using the word “corporation.” Interrogating the role of profit-driven corporations in today’s journalism is crucial, but it’s important to see it as another part of a deep-going questioning of corporations’ power over our lives in general. We talk this week with a veteran of that work. Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.–based Corporate Crime Reporter, and editor and writer at Capitol Hill Citizen. He joins us this week on CounterSpin. https://media.blubrry.com/counterspin/content.blubrry.com/counterspin/CounterSpin260918Mokhiber.mp3   Plus Janine Jackson takes a quick look at recent press coverage of “Alligator Alcatraz.” https://media.blubrry.com/counterspin/content.blubrry.com/counterspin/CounterSpin260918Banter.mp3