The First Amendment protects speech, even hate speech. But there are limits. You can't incite someone to commit a crime. And even without incitement, there are professions where celebrating Kirk's murder demonstrates your lack of fitness. In the military it's criminal to do so.
The assassination of Charlie Kirk was an act of pure evil. But few truly understand what that word means.
Multiple "inferior courts" (pun intended) are refusing to follow the Supreme Court's declaration of precedent on a variety of issues. In particular, SCOTUS declared that you cannot ban "arms in common use FOR LAWFUL PURPOSES." These courts are declaring that the citizen must show that they are "in common use FOR SELF DEFENSE." This same sort of twisting the law is in common use by Democrat judges who simply refuse to obey the Supreme Court.
We're seeing an epidemic of transgender mass murderers. They were all seriously depressed, and likely on SSRIs that can cause murderous thoughts. There are serious roadblocks to being able to identify them before they kill innocents. It's essential that we create a safe harbor in HIPAA for reporting these deranged people before they pull the trigger. It's also essential that we get rid of the orthodoxy that transgender is somehow "normal." And, BTW, "assault weapon" is a meaningless term.
The Supreme Court has made it clear that you have a right to carry a weapon pretty much everywhere. Unfortunately, many lower courts are ignoring the Supreme Court. So let's set the stage. Next time we'll cover some ways that lower courts are dodging their duty. YouTube resources The Four Boxes Diner - Mark Smith - https://www.youtube.com/@TheFourBoxesDiner Washington Gun Law - William Kirk - https://www.youtube.com/@WashingtonGunLaw Tom Grieve - https://www.youtube.com/@AttyTomGrieve T...
Director of National Intelligence Gabbard has declassified the receipts that expose a massive Deep State Conspiracy. But there are some rules for how a conspiracy theory becomes meaningful.
DNI Gabbard's release of the Russiagate receipts is unleashing a legal tsunami with Barack Obama at its center. We discuss the major legal issues.
There is a constitutional requirement for the nomination of judges, and the Chief of Staff running the autopen isn't it.
Trump's battles in the courts are leading to important wins, but primarily on process. In the Birthright Citizenship case (Trump v CASA), the Supreme Court shut down those nationwide injunctions. Now the issues can percolate through the Courts in proper order.
Every case against Trump is in the "process" stage. Not one of them has actually reached the "merits" stage, where a court looks at the facts and the law together. All of the "restraining orders" and "injunctions" are based on first impressions.
Federal Judge Boasberg takes his oath very lightly. He completely ignores the federal rules of judicial ethics, and is utterly unrestrained by the Supreme Court precedents that regulate him. Is it any surprise that he is happy to rule against the Trump administration? Of course, then there's the rest of the story. Details on Boasberg can be found at https://x.com/search?q=boasberg%20judge&src=typeahead_click&f=top Follow Laura Loomer's reporting at https://x.com/LauraLoomer
We tend to think about lawsuits in the sense of who's right. That's merits. But before the court can even think about the merits, it has to go through the process of keeping both sides inside the lines.
Elizabeth Warren may think that we don't have a right to know what the government spend our hard-earned dollars on, but she's dead wrong. There is language in our foundational document that tells us we have an absolute right to that information. We don't need to worry about how the court cases will turn out.
This is the beginning of a discussion of the Constitution and gun law. President Trump tasked AG Bondi with sorting out all of the BATFE rules and regs on guns. Any not in clear agreement with the Constitution were to be thrown out. I go through the key issues, focusing on history Surveys on Defensive Gun Use1791ReconstructionNational Firearms Act of 1934Sonzinzky caseMiller CaseHeller CaseCaetano CaseBruen CaseRahimi caseSnope casewww.lawofselfdefense.com Attorney Andrew Branca
Elon Musk's DOGE has access to virtually every financial record in the US. How is this even remotely legal? (Hint: It's not access, it's how the records are used...)
Lefty Lawyers are screaming that Trump's administration is "lawless." So we take a look at a couple of key issues in Trump's Executive Orders. Key cases: Knauff v. Shaughnessy (1950) Luther v. Borden (1849) US v Abbott (2024) Article 4 Section 4 - the Guarantee Clause Article 1 Section 10 Clause 3 - States may defend against invasion Trump firing IGs and prosecutors is protected activity under Article 2 Section 1 Clause 1.
With President (boy, that sounds good...) Trump's EO stopping birthright citizenship, the predictable legal noise has begun. A judge has declared it unconstitutional, and others are sure to follow. In other courts, we should expect a different answer. Ultimately the Supreme Court will make the decision. We discuss the key issue in the 14th Amendment. What does, "subject to the jurisdiction of" mean?
It's easy to see the causes of the LA fires, if you are willing to follow the critical incident chain. Governor Hair Gel wants us to blame global warming, which isn't hot enough to start fires. There are multiple causes for the fires and the inability to fight them. Every cause points a finger directly at Democrat governance.
Because Trump has a big win in the Georgia case, you won't hear about it from any of the usual talking head. We break it down. Also, we consider the Biden drilling ban. Finally, the idiocy of the FBI management of the New Orleans and Las Vegas events gets a glancing view.
Doctor Ted's Prescription is moving to www.AmericaOutLoud.news. It is now a weekly hour-long show at 7PM on Fridays. Then on Monday it becomes a podcast. Along the way I'm doing a weekly column. Hopefully you'll enjoy the longer format. Thanks for listening here.