DiscoverEthics of Big Data
Ethics of Big Data
Claim Ownership

Ethics of Big Data

Author: Cambridge University

Subscribed: 4Played: 8
Share

Description

The Ethics of a Data-Driven Society (2016-17)

In 2015-16 the Ethics of Big Data Faculty Research Group held a number of seminars and workshops addressing the ethics and politics of 'doing' big data, with an emphasis on the practice of big data research and technology, and the ethical issues raised in the course of the research. In 2016-17 we will address wider questions of The Ethics of a Data Driven Society.


Themes:

Big Data and the Future of Work

In Michaelmas Term (2016) we will explore how Big Data is reshaping the worlds of work, production and employment. We will analyse whether the promise of 'on-demand' production and automated logistics drives the agenda for the 'big data' economy; explore the expanding role of the algorithms in task allocation and performance management for the quantified workplace as well as the impact of device proliferation, ubiquitous connectivity and the rise of social media on surveillance and profiling of employees.

Big Data and the Environment

In Lent Term the focus will be on Environment, specifically issues around environmental sustainability of data infrastructures, and the use of data in managing sustainability, examining how both aspects feed into the discussions of 'ethics' in a data driven world. We will look at the use of data in conservation, and also at energy consumption of data infrastructures, energy efficient data centres, broader issues of sustainability (including resource use, cooling, and recycling of electronic waste).

Big Data and Knowledge

Finally, in Easter Term we will explore the impact of data driven narratives on concepts of knowledge and on the organisation of knowledge production. Issues here include the impact on scientific research of a drive towards open publication of data, the limits of a quantitative view of the world (and the politics of its current primacy in 'big data' narratives over a qualitative one), and the range of views around the importance of data literacy.

Administrative assistance: gradfac@crassh.cam.ac.uk
3 Episodes
Reverse
David Renton (Barrister, Garden Court Chambers) What are the implications for relations between employers and workers of living in a society where passive and active forms of data collection, near-ubiquitous connectivity and proliferating use of digital devices create highly detailed personal ‘data footprints’ combining everything from location data to shopping habits, political opinions and religious beliefs? Recent high-profile court cases have highlighted the ‘blacklisting’ of trade union activists by major construction companies, based the illegal collection of data about their presumed political opinions and personal lives. In an era when billions of people use social media to share information about themselves and their beliefs online, what considerations will shape future battles over the balance between rights to privacy and freedom of expression in the context of employment relations? David Renton specialises in employment law and has worked a number of high-profile cases relating to blacklisting of trade union activists by employers. Before being called to the bar, David was an academic and then a trade union official specialising in discrimination law.
Dr Phoebe Moore (University of Middlesex) Technologies to track work and productivity have a long history, starting with Frederick Taylor's scientific management and Frank and Lilian Gilbreths' fatigue and motion studies. While their research took place in industrial conditions, new technologies have emerged that allow for ever more intimate levels of analysis that go into the realm of the body and physiology as well as emotions and even 'gut reactions' to situations. This session looks at the new world of work, where surveillance and electronic performance monitoring overlap with health and fitness schemes at work, moving beyond psychometrics and gamification. We will ask what the implications are with the newest technologies of the senses and how data produced are increasingly becoming ways to know the self both by the self and to others. How will we be judged as workers and citizens? Who is this new big brother of performance, wellness and self tracking, and should we be afraid of him? Dr Phoebe Moore writes about production, technology, and governance. She is a Senior Lecturer at Middlesex University in the Law and Politics department and her current research analyses tensions between materiality and quantification as people are being tracked and monitored at work from arthouses to warehouses. Dr Moore’s work looks at new performance enhancement techniques beyond the track, asking to what extent wellness and productivity monitoring with wearable sensory technologies could be used for surveillance over micro-conduct? Are new forms of work monitoring part of the trend toward the gig economy where precarious working life has become the norm?
Dr Ala'a Shehabi (The Work Foundation) Valerio de Stefano (Bocconi University, Milan. International Labour Organisation) Abstracts Big Data underpins the operation of digital platforms which are playing an increasingly important role in managing the supply of labour and setting terms of employment in some sectors of the economy, from transport, to food delivery, to domestic repairs and cleaning. Via smartphone apps, companies such as Uber and Taskrabbit, can relay instructions, allocate tasks and monitor performance of a distributed and apparently disposable workforce. Meanwhile, online 'crowdworking' facilitated by platforms such as Amazon's Mechanical Turk or data enrichment company CrowdFlower, breaks work down into 'microtasks' which can be remunerated by the minute, rather than the hour. This seminar will examine the implications of digitally-enabled "on-demand working" for labour rights and social policy. V De Stefano. The so-called "gig-economy" has been growing exponentially in numbers and importance in recent years but its impact on labour rights has been largely overlooked. Forms of work in the "gig-economy" include "crowd work", and "work-on-demand via apps", under which the demand and supply of working activities is matched online or via mobile apps. The presentation discusses the implications of this commodification and advocates the full recognition of activities in the gig-economy as "work". It shows how the gig-economy is not a separate silo of the economy and that is part of broader phenomena such as casualization and informalisation of work and the spread of non-standard forms of employment. It then analyses the risks associated to these activities with regard to Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, as they are defined by the International Labour Organisation (ILO), and addresses the issue of misclassification of the employment status of workers in the gig-economy. Current relevant trends are thus examined, such as the emergence of forms of self-organisation of workers. Finally, some policy proposals are critically analysed, such as the possibility of creating an intermediate category of worker between "employee" and "independent contractor" to classify work in the gig-economy, and other tentative proposals are put forward such extension of fundamental labour rights to all workers irrespective of employment status, and recognition of the role of social partners in this respect, whilst avoiding temptations of hastened deregulation. Biographies Dr Ala'a Shehabi is a senior researcher at The Work Foundation having previously been an analyst at RAND Europe. She has also worked as a researcher and lecturer in the Middle-East and as an analyst in a hedge fund. She has been a visiting fellow at the Arab Council for Social Sciences (2013), Lund University (2014), Stanford University (2015) and has been an independent research consultant for the American University of Beirut and Amnesty International. Her research interests are in development, technology and the future of work. And has worked on projects for the European Commission, the British Academy, AT&T, Department for Culture, Media and Sport amongst others. She has a PhD in econometrics from Imperial College London, an MSc in economics and finance from Warwick University and a BSc in economics and statistics from University College London. Valerio De Stefano holds a Ph.D. in Law of Business and Commerce from Bocconi University in Milan. He joined the International Labour Organisation (ILO) in 2014 and currently works in the Labour Law Reform Unit of the ILO. At the ILO, he has been conducting research on non-standard forms of employment, such as temporary and casual work, temporary agency work, dependent self-employment and on forms of casual labour driven by digitalisation, such as crowdwork. On this topic, he edited a special issue of the Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, entitled "Crowdsourcing, the Gig-Economy, and the Law". He published several peer-reviewed articles on the protection of freedom of association and trade union rights at the comparative, European and International level and the regulation of precarious work. He is also a teaching fellow in labour and employment law at Bocconi University in Milan where he also was a post-doctoral researcher from 2011 to 2014. He was a visiting academic at UCL in 2012 and a post-doctoral member at Clare Hall College, the University of Cambridge, in 2013.
Comments