High-Key with CMT

On this week’s podcast, I want to turn to another deadly war for children that Israel is also litigating right now: Lebanon. “Recent escalation has killed or wounded the equivalent of one classroom of children every day, [in Lebanon]” according to UNICEF deputy chief Ted Chaiban, who helps lead the UN organization that’s dedicated to safeguarding children. That grim statistic is on top of the more than 1 million people who have been displaced in Lebanon since the end of February, when Israel renewed with brio its mission to destroy Hezbollah, the Iran-backed Shia militant group. In Lebanon, as with Iran, innocent civilians are stuck between Israeli bombings, and the hardship of living under a regime that professes to be fighting on behalf of the masses. We’re seeing a similar tactical manifesto unfold in Lebanon as we saw in Gaza, where Israel talked of surgical strikes against Hamas, another Iranian-backed group; in Lebanon civilian centers have been repeatedly and apparently remorselessly struck. Hospitals and ambulances have been attacked. Journalists have been targeted. And Israel’s defense minister Israel Katz said this past weekend that the IDF will accelerate the demolition of Lebanese homes in frontline villages along the border between the two countries, “in line with the model we applied in Gaza’s Rafah and Beit Hanoun,” which have been almost entirely wiped out. I wanted to talk to Dalal Mawad about what’s going on inside Lebanon. Dalal is a brilliant Lebanese journalist, now based in Paris, and the author of ‘All She Lost’ a truly moving book about the women of Lebanon who have been stuck in a cycle of violence for decades.  “I was looking at this app that’s been circulating among Lebanese. It asks you, when were you born, and it tells you how many years of your life were spent in war. I got 52% and I got out five years ago. You are talking about these children? I think some of them, that’s all they’ve known. And so it feels like an, it’s never ending. It’s endless cycles of, of violence and the Lebanese are merely surviving.”Author and journalist Dalal Mawad, talking to me on High-Key with CMT this weekWe talk about the similarities between women inside Iran and women in Lebanon; while it would be reductive to suggest they face the same day-to-day, it is undeniable that women in both nations are subject to the whims and power of men. Many activists have tried to draw attention to these issues and, in Iran and Afghanistan in particular, call for this so-called gender apartheid to be formally criminalized. Do follow Dalal on social media and learn more about her poignant book here Thanks for reading High-Key with CMT! This post is public so feel free to share it.And turning once more to Iran: As the war in Iran enters its fourth week, civilians across the region continue to pay a price for the costly endeavor being waged by the U.S. and Israel; a military show of force that continues to have no consistently articulated goal. More than 3 million Iranians have been displaced since late February, and many more millions remain stuck between the destruction of the bombings, and the iron grip of the Islamic Republic’s theocratic regime which to-date shows no signs of relenting or retreating. There are scant cases of any defectors, and few signs that the Iranian people are able to mount any kind of uprising in the near-term. Human rights groups estimate that between 600 and 1,300 civilians have been killed; the latter tally from the Iranian Red Crescent. This of course includes the unlawful and deadly strike on the Shajareh Tayyebeh elementary school in Minab, in Southern Iran, that left 168 children and educators dead (a strike that now seems almost certainly to have been perpetrated by the U.S.). Iran’s children, Lebanon’s children, Israel’s children - so many innocents being lost as a result of these military assaults. There is no end in sight, despite assertions from the Trump administration that the war has already been won, or that things will be winding down soon. The latest late-night screed from President Trump on his social media platform this weekend was a threat to bomb Iran’s power plants if the regime doesn’t weaken its grip on the Strait of Hormuz; a move that would effectively plunge civilians into darkness. Millions of Iranians are already in an internet blackout, at the command of the regime, and this escalation from the Trump admin would pile on to the already challenging day-to-day for civilians. Not to mention, targeting civilian structures in this way is a war crime under international law. But what country is adhering to that anymore…?As always, reach out to me with comments or guest suggestions for future pod episodes. Thanks for reading High-Key with CMT! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit caromt.substack.com

In this week’s episode, I spoke with Hadi Ghaemi, founder of the Center for Human Rights in Iran (CHRI) about something the world is not paying nearly enough attention to: The fate of Iran’s political prisoners.“I am really worried that the regime feeling the insecurity, and the existential threat it feels right now [that] it will turn to political prisoners and massacre them to make sure they’re not there to play a constructive role in the future of the country.”Hadi Ghaemi, founder Center for Human Rights in Iran (CHRI)With internet access cut once again by the regime, and the city under siege by U.S. and Israeli bombing, direct communication with prisoners inside jails including the notorious Evin prison is nearly impossible. But Hadi tells me that what he’s been hearing through interlocutors on the ground is chilling. Both Evin and Greater Tehran prisons have reportedly been handed over to the Islamic Republic’s Revolutionary Guard’s special forces — units known for their brutality — with warnings that any unrest from the detainees will be met with lethal force. Shoot-to-kill orders aren’t just rumored on the streets; they may now define life behind bars for thousand.Inside those walls are not only well-known figures, like Nobel peace prize winner Narges Mohammadi, but what Hadi calls the country’s “Evin University;” academics, labor leaders, students, women’s rights activists, and thousands of young protesters swept up in January’s deadly crackdown.Hadi estimates that as many as 50,000 people were rounded up and imprisoned after the Islamic Republic regime conducted its mass killings of civilians back in January; the most violent attack on the population since the inception of the regime back in 1979. Many represent the intellectual and civic backbone of a future Iran. History makes the danger painfully clear — the regime has massacred political prisoners before when it felt existentially threatened.Meanwhile, U.S. and Israeli strikes have targeted the regime’s security infrastructure that often doubles as detention sites for people who have been arrested for peacefully protesting the government. In this episode, we also discussed dual nationals— long used as bargaining chips — who Hadi believes are now vulnerable to being moved, hidden, or worse.So what can people watching in horror at home do?“We should use our voice,” Ghaemi says. “I would hope that the people who care will use their social media presence and voice to bring up the issue of political prisoners.”Amplify their names. Raise the issue. Pressure foreign governments to prioritize civilian and prisoner protection. In moments like this, silence is not neutral.Thanks for reading High-Key with CMT! This post is public so feel free to share it. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit caromt.substack.com

Today on the pod we’re talking about the state of the U.S. Supreme Court, an institution that’s supposed to be a check on the executive branch, but one that’s taken a reputational battering in the past few years. It was once one of the most respected facets of American life. Not any longer, and not just according to liberals either; many conservatives are increasingly dismayed by what they see as political pandering by the justices to President Trump. The court is polling at near historic public opinion lows. President Trump, of course, appointed the last three sitting court justices. The court is now a 6-3 three conservative majority, and has been under increased scrutiny for its handling of cases brought by the administration, and also its relationship towards longstanding legal precedent (most notably, of course, the court overturned Roe v Wade, which gutted 50-plus years of precedent enshrining abortion rights in the country, in 2022).Top of mind for many of you this week will likely be same-sex marriage: In a recent podcast interview, Hillary Clinton predicted the U.S. Supreme Court will eventually overturn same-sex marriage, and Clinton’s portend is obviously of deep concern for many Americans, not least because this current incarnation of the Supreme Court has recent form for overturning precedent.To get a handle on the likelihood of the court garroting LGBTQ rights (even further) and to understand what the court has been up to while we’ve all been swimming upstream against tidal waves of (mostly bad) news this summer, I called up my old colleague Cristian Farias. Cristian is a lawyer and a fantastic legal journalist who writes for The New Yorker and Vanity Fair, amongst others. Cristian and I go way back; we worked together at The Huffington Post during the heyday of new media, when the cold brew was in abundance, and there were Cliff bars in every office kitchen. (Hopefully no one is triggered by this!)Thanks for reading High-Key with CMT! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.I ask Cristian about the current panic around same-sex marriage and whether the court will actually attempt to gut the decade-old precedent set by the Obergefell decision ten years ago. There’s also been a lot of chatter about the overreach of the court, particularly in the way its been issuing rulings via the so-called “shadow docket,” which allows the court to intervene in emergency cases without offering a lengthy opinion offering its reasoning…something Cristian argues is borderline tyrannical. We dive into all this and more on the pod. As always, you can drop me a line hello@caromt.com. Or you can just comment under this episode. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit caromt.substack.com

Today, the body that recommends what vaccines are given to Americans, and when, met in Atlanta for the first of a two-day summit. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices panel (ACIP) has a lot of power; states use its recommendations to decide the vaccine mandates for school-aged children, and ACIP recommendations impact how private health insurance companies and the U.S. government cover the cost of recommended vaccines (for example, how much Medicaid will cover). The ACIP, which has been around since 1964, usually meets three times a year and without too much media fanfare. This year things are different. Controversial firingsJust two weeks before the panel was due to meet for one of its triannual meetings, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. controversially fired all 17 members of the panel, accusing them of having conflicts of interest and undermining American’s trust in health, an accusation each member vigorously denies. [Note: Committee members have to undergo extensive background and conflict checks before their appointments.] Instead, RFK Jr. appointed eight new members to the panel— a group of people who, for the most part, have limited expertise in virology or immunology. Half of the panel have expressed some kind of reluctance to recommend vaccines, and a desire to shake up the status quo in terms of the timetable of when immunizations are given to Americans, particularly kids. Breaking News: New recommendations from the ACIP on Wednesday Tonight, we know of at least two new recommendations made to the CDC by the newly formed ACIP panel:* The panel is going to establish a group to scrutinize the vaccine schedule for children and adolescents, meaning it will potentially have the power to upend what vaccines are offered to infants, kids and teens. * A separate working group will be established solely to review the safety of certain vaccines, including MMR and chickenpox vaccine, and Hepatitis B shot given to infants upon birth; these are shots that have been approved and in use for seven years or more. They’ve also been shots that have long met the ire of people who identify with the ‘Make America Healthy Again’ (MAHA) movement. The overwhelming response by the majority of members of the public health community has been one of dismay and outrage. But there’s also been a lot of noise from MAHA and weary Americans who, particularly since Covid, have felt overwhelmed by a glut of misinformation around vaccines, coupled with a lament over perceived government overreach into their lives. What are the stakes for American’s health?I wanted to understand the stakes for Americans, particularly for children, and try to help us all put a finger on the pulse of the state of vaccine health in America today. So, I called Dr Paul Offit, who previously served on the ACIP, to help us unpack all of this on the podcast today. Dr. Offit is director of the vaccine education center and professor of pediatrics in the division of infectious diseases at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. He’s an internationally recognized expert in the fields of virology and immunology, and he serves as a member of the FDA’s vaccine advisory committee. He’s also the co-inventor of the Rotavirus vaccine, Rotateq, recommended for universal use in infants by the CDC. But he calls himself a “vaccine skeptic” - perhaps a curious thing for someone with his credentials to self-label, and something that I ask him about on the pod. “ Most parents value vaccines, because they realize that [immunizations] put their children in the healthiest position possible. Knowing that, knowing that good science wins out in the end. I do think that, that we will get through this. But I think it's gonna be a rough ride for a couple years.” — Dr. Paul Offit, speaking on the ‘High Key with CMT’ podcastOur conversation isn’t just limited to the ACIP, but about the state of public health in general in the U.S. One thing I want to note, as I mention in the podcast, and as Dr. Offit reasserts, is that despite the very emotional headlines around this topic, vaccines are broadly accepted and desired by the American public. A recent bipartisan poll examined registered voters’ perspectives on vaccination trends, and found that the majority of Americans - 74% - believe the U.S. should prioritize ensuring FDA-approved vaccines are widely available for everyone, 81% of voters say it is important for the U.S. to remain a leader in developing new vaccines, and nearly 70% of respondents expressed concern over declining vaccination rates among children. [Source: Public Opinion Strategies and Lake Research Partners]And, as Dr. Offit tells me on the pod, “ Most parents value vaccines, because they realize that [immunizations] put their children in the healthiest position possible. Knowing that, knowing that good science wins out in the end. I do think that, that we will get through this. But I think it's gonna be a rough ride for a couple years.”One note: Paul and I recorded our conversation on Monday, before the ACIP convened, but he has promised that he’ll come back to give us a mini-bonus pod update if anything more seismic comes out of the coming days. Right, that’s it from me this week. As always, drop me a comment with your thoughts, and hope you’re all surviving the news cycle apocalypse as best as anyone can. -CMT This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit caromt.substack.com

On the pod this week, I chat with Iranian-American essayist and novelist Porochista Khakpour to unpack Jafar Panahi’s remarkable Cannes win for his new film, It Was Just An Accident; a darkly funny revenge thriller about a group of men and women banding together after one kidnaps a man they believe tortured them in prison. Panahi, 64, is a true renegade, whose artistry is matched only by his incredible courage. He’s been imprisoned in Iran several times, gone on hunger strike to protest his imprisonment and the detention of his fellow filmmakers, and had his film career surveilled and suppressed by the Iranian authorities. Legend has it he had to smuggle one of his films out of the country in a USB stick hidden inside a birthday cake to evade the country’s notorious censors. But with the world’s media watching, and despite the very real threat of blowback from the Iranian government, Panahi used his Cannes acceptance speech as a call to action for Iranians around the world, urging them to “set aside all problems, all differences” and focus on freedom for the country. “I believe this is the moment to call on all people, all Iranians, with all their differing opinions, wherever they are in the world – in Iran or abroad – to allow me to ask for one thing…let’s set aside all problems, all differences. What matters most right now is our country and the freedom of our country.” — Jafar Panahi, accepting the Palme d’Or at the 78th Cannes Film Festival on May 24, 2025. I wanted to ask Porochista how she felt as a fellow Iranian living in the diaspora, and as an artist who has long been hopeful- like me- for an Iran free from theocracy and violence. What followed was a freewheeling conversation about identity, politics and culture, which I hope you all enjoy. Why has Panahi been persecuted by Iranian authorities? Imprisoned multiple times by Iranian authorities—most recently released in February 2023 after a hunger strike—Panahi’s films often stem from the harsh realities he’s endured. It Was Just An Accident was inspired by conversations with inmates in Evin Prison, made in secret despite a 20-year ban on him making films, an unwelcome provision of a jail sentence he received after participating in the 2009 Green Movement protests.His Cannes appearance marks his first on the Croisette since 2003, a rare moment outside Iran’s borders. Despite the risks, Panahi continues to make films, supporting fellow artists, and defying the regime’s censorship. He’s also made the choice to stay in Iran - rather than live and work in exile, something we unpack on the pod. As Porochista notes: “This [Panahi’s Cannes win] is such a triumph, especially for a filmmaker who's been so adamant about his activism.”Porochista’s own family fled Iran during the 1979 revolution when she was just a year-old, and like so many Iranians, she works and creates her art in exile. From her eclectic and provocative collection of essays Brown Album, to her new novel Tehrangeles, delve into what it means to belong, to be displaced, self-style an identity, and fight for your own voice.What’s the current status of the Woman, Life, Freedom movement? And other questions… My conversation with Porochista was rooted in the themes of identity, self-determination and cultural expression, rather than a dissection of the current geo-political moment. But, as always when discussing Iran and the complexities of the systems currently governing the nation, it feels important to punctuate some of the beats of our discussion with some additional important context. Here is a Q&A that I hope does that:* Q: Recently, we’ve seen a flurry of media activity in the country, with many foreign news outlets being allowed back inside Iran for the first time in a while. This week, for instance, the Washington Post reported from inside the country for the first time in 10-years. Why? A: Well, we often see these moments of perceived softening of press freedoms* when there is a political maneuver the country is attempting to make. Currently, the country is in low-level talks with the Trump administration to enter into a potential new nuclear deal, and negotiate its way out of the crippling sanctions which have decimated Iran’s economy. It also wants to avoid an Israeli strike against it, which has been floated by Israeli PM Netanyahu in recent weeks. (*Note: this doesn’t apply to journalists inside the country, who are frequently targeted and imprisoned or muzzled. Iran remains one of the world’s most dangerous countries for journalists.) * Q: In our conversation, Porochista and I note the “hero’s welcome” (quotation marks intentional) that Panahi was given when he arrived back in Tehran a few days after his Cannes win. And Panahi himself gave an interview to The Hollywood Reporter where he stated, “the court invalidated all the sentences against me. They were all canceled, so now there is no legal case against me, and I have no legal issues.” Is this the end of the story? A: No. I want to underscore, as I did on the podcast, that Panahi’s comments don’t mean he is not in potential legal peril. The Islamic Republic is self-interested, and almost all of its actions are to preserve and perpetuate its own existence, often at the expense of Iranian people. If the regime believes Panahi to be a threat, it will - as it has in the past - conjure up spurious criminal charges against him. * Q: If Panahi feels able to go back and live/work inside Iran, why don’t other prominent Iranians? A: Panahi’s very personal decision is by no means him absolving or downplaying the cruelty of the Islamic Republic. As he noted in an interview with The Hollywood Reporter: “Now there are Iranian artists, Iranian directors all over the world. They have had to leave their homeland and adapt to another society, and some of them have been able to create elsewhere and make films that are important, films that are being seen and celebrated. I must say that all these compatriots of mine have an ability that I don’t have. I’m just completely incapable of adjusting to another society other than my own. Whenever I leave Iran, I realize I’m not able to survive in another country, to live there, to work there, or make a film there. I’m just not able to survive and adapt to a new environment, to a new society. I had to be in Paris for three and a half months for the post-production of this film, and I thought I was going to die. It was so difficult for me, professionally and personally.” Panahi underscores that his decision is absolutely personal and not a reflection on an increased level of safety for him or other artists, or dissenters, in the country. Indeed, after the festival drew to a close, Iran summoned the French Ambassador to Iran for his comments about Panahi’s win, when he referred to the film “as a gesture of resistance against the Iranian regime's oppression.”Human Rights Watch and other NGOs have repeatedly raised concerns against human rights violations the regime has carried out against its own people. This week, the regime conducted a spate of extrajudicial executions against minority populations, in contravention to human rights law. * Q: What is the current status of the ‘Woman, Life, Freedom’ movement? A: The movement has been largely silenced due to a sustained violent campaign by the Islamic Republic to oppress those who participated. Thousands of people were rounded up and imprisoned during the period 2022-2023. Many were killed. Protestors families were targeted, financially and physically. The backlash to the movement was felt acutely by minority groups- Jina Mahsa Amini was herself Kurdish-Iranian, who have long been persecuted by the regime and before. Yet, protests persist as Iranians find ways to rail against the status quo. Currently, a trucker strike has been disrupting the country, with everyday people rising up to protest against the poor economy, a possible hike in fuel prices, and corruption. As always, drop a comment if you have any thoughts or questions, and let me know if there are any other topics that you want us to delve into on the pod.— CMT Thanks for reading High-Key with CMT! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit caromt.substack.com

Today is the one-month anniversary of Pope Francis’ death. A lot has happened since; the election of Pope Leo XIV, the first American to lead the Church, political spats between right-wing MAGA Catholics and the Vatican, and plentiful accusations that this Pope is even more “woke” than his predecessor…all less than two-weeks into the job. To unpack it all, I speak to Christopher White, the Vatican correspondent for the National Catholic Reporter, and a contributor to NBC News. “I think (Pope) Leo understands quite well just how divided the U.S. church is because of his own family. I mean, his own brother is very much a MAGA Catholic.” - Christopher WhiteChris brings a wealth of knowledge to the pod. He’s been reporting from inside the Vatican for years and has a lot of insight into the schism that’s been happening inside American Catholicism. We talk about JD Vance, Pope Leo’s very chatty brothers (!), and what to make of the Pope’s pointed criticism of the ongoing dreadful humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Fun fact: Chris is also my Broadway sensei, and gives us his Tony predictions at the end of the pod. You can listen to our full conversation here. Let me know what you think in the comments or drop me an email. Thanks for reading High-Key with CMT! This post is public so feel free to share it. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit caromt.substack.com