INSIDE BRIEFING with Institute for Government
Author: Institute for Government
Subscribed: 1,083Played: 54,607Description
These are tumultuous times in UK politics. Government is under strain, the civil service is under pressure, and ministers are grappling with the fallout of Covid, the impact of Brexit and an unprecedented cost-of-living crisis. So where is government working well and what is it doing badly? What can be done to make No10, the Treasury and the rest of government function more effectively? And as a general election draws ever nearer, what are the key political and policy dividing lines – and what do they mean for the way this country is run?
Get behind the scenes in Westminster, Whitehall and beyond on the weekly podcast from Britain’s leading governmental think tank, where we analyse the latest events in politics and explain what they mean. Every week on INSIDE BRIEFING, IfG director Hannah White and the team welcome special guests for a free-ranging conversation on what makes government work – and how to fix it when it doesn’t.
I would be interested to see fitness-for-office criteria reviewed in a "necessary & sufficient" framework. I largely agreed with Anthony Seldon's list but it aspired to perfection. Since we can't have perfection shouldn't we at least be able to boil it down to some necessary conditions. For example, isn't personal probity necessary in a democracy? Otherwise respect for the office is diluted. Of course it's hard to decide in advance if an otherwise morally spotless character will go off the rails in office but it's much easier to see if a candidate has a past track record of lying, financial recklessness etc. which may well be carried over into office. You may say it's harsh to rule such people out, we all make mistakes etc but this is a rather exceptional job