Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

If you want to enjoy the holidays without unwanted encounters with the law, this episode is a must-listen!Welcome back to Lawyer Talk! In this episode, host Steve Palmer shares a timely holiday public service announcement, drawing on decades of legal experience.As the festive season ramps up, so do risks associated with alcohol—whether it’s family arguments that get out of hand or those dangerous decisions to drive after drinking. Steve Palmer explains why law enforcement is more vigilant during the holidays, discusses the realities of sobriety checkpoints and increased patrols, and offers practical advice to keep your celebrations safe, civil, and free from legal trouble.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At LawMentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

If courtroom showdowns, legal strategy, and headline-making trials are your thing, you won't want to miss this episode!Welcome back to Lawyer Talk! In this episode, Steve Palmer and Troy Henricksen talk about a hot legal issue that’s making big headlines: the trial of Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan.This isn’t your everyday courtroom drama—judge Dugan’s actions set off a wave of political controversy and questions about judicial authority, federal versus state power, and the real-life consequences of policies clashing in America’s courthouses.Steve Palmer and Troy Henricksen break down the facts like a law school case study, dissecting the judge’s decision to confront federal immigration agents and help an undocumented defendant avoid ICE agents in the courthouse.The conversation covers everything from the tangled web of federal and state jurisdictions, the constitutional Supremacy Clause, and judicial immunity, to the practical strategies used in jury selection—like seeking jurors who might lean a certain way politically.Throughout the episode, you’ll hear spirited debate, memorable courthouse anecdotes, and sharp legal analysis as Steve Palmer and Troy Henricksen put themselves in the shoes of both the prosecution and the defense. They predict outcomes, debate gray areas in the law, and even place a friendly wager on how this real-world legal drama will unfold.Moments00:00 "Judge Defies ICE in Courtroom"03:29 "Out the Back Door"09:13 "Supremacy Clause and Federal Law"12:45 "Mens Rea: Intent Explained"15:44 "Politics and Fair Trial Debate"17:11 Jury Nullification and Political Context20:30 "Verdict Predictions and Recap"Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Can Police Still Search Your Car for the Smell of Marijuana?Steve Palmer and Troy Henricksen discuss the “plain smell” doctrine—a hot topic in criminal procedure, especially with all the changes surrounding marijuana laws in Ohio. They walk you through what cops can and can’t do during a traffic stop when they detect the scent of marijuana, explaining how the Fourth Amendment and recent legal changes affect searches, privacy rights, and law enforcement actions.Together, they break down the evolution from the days when the mere odor of marijuana was enough for a search, to today’s more complex landscape where medical and even recreational use of marijuana has changed the legal calculus. They explain how “probable cause” is no longer as simple as it used to be, why the plain smell doctrine isn’t as clear-cut, and what this means for drivers, law enforcement, and anyone interested in constitutional rights.If you’ve ever wondered how legalization affects your rights on the road—or if you just enjoy following the ever-changing world of criminal law—this is an episode you won’t want to miss. Moments00:00 "Fourth Amendment and Automotive Exception"03:55 Ohio's Plain Smell Doctrine Explained08:06 "Probable Cause and Police Inquiry"10:45 "Law and Society Evolving"Here are 3 key takeaways:The “Plain Smell Doctrine” Isn’t What It Used To Be: The once-clear rule that the odor of marijuana gave police probable cause to search your car is now muddy in Ohio and other states with legalized cannabis. Police must consider if there’s a legal reason for the odor before jumping to conclusions.Legalization Shifts the Burden: With legal medical and recreational marijuana, officers should now do more investigating before deciding to search. Simply smelling marijuana isn’t enough—they need facts pointing toward illegality.Know Your Rights: If you’re ever pulled over and marijuana is involved, you aren’t required to answer all questions. Like Steve Palmer emphasized, politely exercising your right to remain silent could matter more than ever as courts adapt to new laws.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm...

If you’ve ever wondered how verdicts really work, what rights defendants have, and whether prosecutors can get a second chance after a loss in court, you won’t want to miss this insightful episode.Welcome back to Lawyer Talk! In this episode, host Steve Palmer dives into a recent Columbus, Ohio case involving police officer Connor Grubbs, who was acquitted of homicide-related charges after a controversial shooting incident. While the case sparked plenty of heated debate, today’s focus is on a fascinating legal question: can the government appeal an acquittal if they disagree with the verdict?Drawing from his decades of criminal defense experience, Steve Palmer breaks down why—thanks to the Fifth Amendment and double jeopardy protections—the answer is a firm “no.” He also sheds light on those rare exceptions when a government CAN appeal, such as when evidence is suppressed before trial. Got a legal question? Steve Palmer invites listeners to reach out for future episodes at LawyerTalkPodcast.com.Key Takeaways:No Appeals After Acquittal: Once a jury finds a defendant not guilty, the government cannot appeal the verdict. This is a fundamental protection for defendants in our justice system.Limited Exceptions Exist: The government can sometimes appeal pre-trial rulings—such as when crucial evidence is suppressed—but only before trial and never after an acquittal.Double Jeopardy Protection: The Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy clause prevents the government from putting someone on trial for the same crime more than once, cementing the acquittal as final.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Whether you’re curious about famous cases, the restoration of rights, or the possibility of pardoning undiscovered crimes, this episode has all the answers. Welcome to another episode of Lawyer Talk! In today's Q&A-style session, host Steve Palmer explains the intriguing topic of presidential pardons. Drawing from questions submitted by listeners and recent headlines, Steve explores the true extent of the president's pardon power—what it covers, what it doesn’t, and the notable differences between federal and state convictions. With a blend of historical perspective and legal insight, you’ll learn how past presidents have used this authority, the constitutional roots of the power, and the real-world implications for those who receive pardons. Grab your headphones as we demystify presidential pardons here on Lawyer Talk!Here are the top three takeaways:Presidential Pardons Are Limited to Federal Convictions - The U.S. President cannot pardon state court convictions (e.g., cases from New York or Ohio); the power only applies to federal offenses.Rights Restoration—Not Expungement - A pardon restores rights lost due to conviction (firearms, voting, etc.), but doesn’t erase the record like an expungement.Scope of Pardon Power: Broad, But Not Boundless - Courts have affirmed the President’s wide-ranging ability to pardon, but there’s lingering legal uncertainty around pardons for crimes “not yet discovered” or future offenses—especially given recent actions.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Ready to find out what’s really at stake in the suppression hearing?Welcome back to Lawyer Talk, where we go off the record but stay on the air. In this episode, Steve Palmer and Troy Henricksen dive deep into the suppression hearing in the high-profile case of Luigi Mangione—the man accused of shooting Brian Thompson, CEO of UnitedHealthcare.Together, they break down not just what happened during Mangione’s arrest at a Pennsylvania McDonald’s, but also the crucial legal arguments taking shape around his constitutional rights. Was Mangione truly “in custody” when police cornered and questioned him? Did officers follow Miranda protocols, or did they overstep? What about the search of his backpack, which uncovered a manifesto and firearm—was that lawful, or a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights?From the nuances of custodial interrogation to the exceptions that allow police searches without a warrant, Steve Palmer brings his 30 years of criminal defense experience to the table, while Troy Henricksen offers insightful questions and analysis from a law student’s perspective. Whether you’re a legal aficionado or just intrigued by courtroom drama, this episode gives you a front-row seat to the arguments and strategies that could shape the outcome of one of the country’s biggest cases.Moments00:00 Police Violations of Constitutional Rights03:34 "Luigi's Suppression Hearing Details"09:07 Mangione's Freedom Questioned10:03 "Police-Controlled Environment Analysis"16:22 "Suppressed Statements Impact Cases"17:32 "Miranda Rights and Custodial Interrogation"22:24 "Wingspan Search Exception Debate"26:02 "Terrorism Charges Dropped"27:49 "Inventory Search Exception Explained"30:24 "Search Validity Debate in Court"33:15 "Legal Insights and Q&A"Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Can a prison sentence be extended after someone’s already behind bars? Using the tragic story behind Ohio’s Reagan Tokes Act as a starting point, we break down how and why sentences might be lengthened, what role the parole authority plays, and the evolution of sentencing laws in Ohio. Along the way, we touch upon the legal debates around due process, the politics of laws named after victims, and what all of this means for people caught up in the system. Whether you’re curious about indefinite sentences, parole hearings, or just want to know how the law actually works beyond the headlines, this episode brings clarity—with plenty of opinions. Here are 3 key takeaways:The Reagan Tokes Act in Ohio introduced indefinite sentencing: For qualifying felony crimes of violence, offenders receive a sentencing range (e.g., 8 to 11 years). The parole board can extend incarceration up to the maximum if there are continuing risks or infractions, fundamentally shifting how time served is determined.Due process and legal controversy: The Ohio Supreme Court recently upheld the Reagan Tokes Act’s structure (in State v. Hacker, 2023), deciding that the judge still sets the range while the parole authority determines exactly how long is served—raising ongoing debates around separation of powers and due process.The risks of “exception-based” legislation: Laws named after victims, like the Reagan Tokes Act, often arise from singular, horrific events. While politically compelling, they can create widespread changes affecting many beyond the case that prompted them.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Steve Palmer and law student Troy Henricksen talk about a timely and thought-provoking topic—the delicate balance between following military orders and questioning their legality and morality. With recent political debates swirling around Congress members urging military personnel not to obey unlawful executive orders, the conversation delves into both personal experience and historical context.Drawing from Troy Henricksen’s background in the military, the discussion explores how soldiers are trained to respond to commands, when it’s acceptable to challenge orders, and the tricky ethical territory that comes with it. Together, Steve Palmer and Troy Henricksen look at famous examples from history and pop culture—from the Nuremberg trials to Hollywood films like “Crimson Tide”—to illuminate the very real dilemmas facing those in uniform today.Whether you’re interested in the intersection of law, politics, or ethics, this episode promises a nuanced look at what really happens when the chain of command is put to the test. Key Points:Soldiers Are Taught to Follow Orders—With Limits. Troy Henricksen shares firsthand insight: soldiers must obey commands, but there are clear exceptions for unlawful or unethical orders. The “Nuremberg defense” (“just following orders”) is not absolute.Human Discretion Is Baked Into U.S. Military Law. Unlike some historical regimes, the American system expects soldiers to use judgment about the morality and legality of orders—balancing strict discipline with individual responsibility.The Political Debate Is Complicated and Ongoing. Both Steve Palmer and Troy Henricksen highlight how politicians can weaponize legal nuances, creating dilemmas not just for policy but for individuals tasked with carrying out those orders.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Can you legally resist an unlawful arrest? Get ready to rethink your next driving adventure on Lawyer Talk.Welcome back to Lawyer Talk, the show where legal questions become everyday conversations. Steve Palmer and law student Troy Henricksen talk about a question submitted by a listener: “Can you be arrested for speeding?”Together, they explore how this scenario unfolds in real life versus what’s taught in law school, unraveling the nitty-gritty of misdemeanor classifications and police authority in Ohio. The discussion blends practical insights with legal theory, highlighting what makes an arrest lawful or unlawful—and what your rights might look like if you’re pulled over for speeding.From slippery slopes in policing to constitutional protections against unreasonable punishment, this episode gives a fresh perspective on traffic stops, minor misdemeanors, and what happens if those flashing lights turn into handcuffs. 3 Key Takeaways:Minor Misdemeanors Are Different: In Ohio (and most states), typical speeding violations are classified as minor misdemeanors, which means the law does not allow police to arrest you for them. Arrests are generally reserved for offenses with potential jail time.Exceptions Exist: If you're charged with something more severe, like reckless operation (e.g., going 100mph), you can be lawfully arrested because those charges aren't considered minor misdemeanors.Know Your Rights If Arrested Unlawfully: An unlawful arrest for a minor offense could be a violation of your Fourth Amendment rights. Steve suggests that you may have grounds for a civil rights lawsuit if you’re arrested when the statute doesn’t allow it.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Whether you’re a legal eagle or just curious about how our justice system really works, this episode peels back the layers of a question that’s more complicated than it seems. Steve Palmer and law student Troy Henricksen answer the question - should jury deliberations be recorded? This topic was sparked by a thought-provoking listener comment, and they examine whether adding cameras or audio equipment to the deliberation room could help ensure justice, or if it would erode the very foundation of our jury system.Together, they walk through the practical, historical, and ethical implications of such recordings, exploring everything from the psychology of being watched to the slippery slope of judicial oversight. You’ll hear about the deep roots of the jury process, why secrecy is considered sacred, and real-world scenarios where recording could have changed outcomes. They even touch on how Hollywood has tackled jury misconduct and why, despite its intrigue, recording deliberations could open a Pandora’s box no one wants to confront.Moments00:00 "Judgment, Intervention, and Consequences"05:32 "Studio Syndrome and Self-Consciousness"07:54 "Jury Oversight and Its Impact"11:14 Jury Rights and Misconduct Discussion14:01 "Office Case: Video Evidence"16:19 "Jury Misconduct in 12 Angry Men"Here are 3 key takeaways:Sanctity of Deliberations: Recording jury deliberations would undermine the free, honest exchange we rely on for justice—jurors might perform for the camera, not for the cause of truth.Scope Creep Is Real: Once those recordings exist, it's only a matter of time before someone wants to review, challenge, or legislate over their content. This opens the door to meddling and second-guessing, ultimately weakening the jury’s independence.Exceptions vs. The Rule: While egregious misconduct (like bringing outside evidence) does allow for review and intervention, the rare exception shouldn't justify upending centuries-old protections that ensure jury autonomy.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and...

We answer a bold comment from a seasoned police officer who claims he’s never lost a case—and apparently, lawyers fear him at the courthouse doors. Hey everyone, welcome back to Lawyer Talk! Steve and Troy talk about the realities of dealing with police on the street, especially when it comes to handing over your ID or deciding whether to stand your ground.You’ll hear Steve talk candidly about why challenging a cop during a traffic stop almost never works out in your favor, and how a little courtesy goes a long way both roadside and in court. And just to clear things up, Troy asks whether lawyers actually beg officers for plea deals—or if that’s just cop talk.It’s a real, no-nonsense conversation with plenty of personal stories, practical advice, and some good-natured banter between lawyer and student. Let’s get into what happens when you’re face-to-face with experience, authority, and the law itself!Key Takeaways:Comply First, Challenge Later: Steve emphasizes that the side of the road is not the time to debate a police officer’s authority. If given a lawful order, compliance can avoid additional charges. Disputes are best resolved in court, not during the initial encounter.Respect and Professionalism Matter: Both highlight that maintaining respect—whether you’re a lawyer, defendant, or officer—can positively influence outcomes. Simple gestures, like providing an ID and staying courteous, often lead to smoother interactions.Negotiating Plea Deals Involves Many Parties: Steve clarifies that while prosecutors typically handle plea bargains, police officers can influence case negotiations. Treating everyone involved respectfully can make a crucial difference, especially if an officer’s input is needed for a favorable resolution.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

If you’ve ever felt weird about being stopped after clearing security, or just want to know what your rights really are at the airport, this episode’s got you covered.Why can TSA just pull you aside at the airport and dig through your bags, even if you haven’t done anything suspicious? Steve Palmer and Troy Hendrickson are tackling this head-on, starting with a listener’s YouTube question that gets right to the heart of the TSA search dilemma.Steve breaks down the difference between actual searches that need legal justification and those “consensual encounters” we all sign up for when we choose to fly. The conversation gets into legal stuff like the Fourth Amendment, airport security policies, and an old Supreme Court case (Florida v. Royer) that spelled out where the lines are drawn.Here are 3 key takeaways from their discussion:Consent is Everything: When you purchase a ticket and enter the airport, you’re essentially consenting to the TSA screening process. As Steve explains, you can always choose not to fly, but once you step into the process, searches are part of the deal.Not All Searches Are Equal: The courts (notably Florida v. Royer) distinguish between consensual encounters and those that require Fourth Amendment justification. Routine TSA screenings are generally considered consensual, but more targeted detentions (like pulling someone into a room) can cross the line into requiring probable cause.Police & TSA Can’t Collaborate for a Pretext: Law enforcement can’t use TSA procedures to skirt constitutional protections. If they use airport security as a cover to target someone they couldn’t otherwise search, that becomes a Fourth Amendment issue.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Steve Palmer and Troy Hendrickson jump right into the crazy buzz we’ve seen on TikTok after their chat about police body cam footage. Turns out, the internet had a LOT to say—everything from questioning why cops turn off their cameras, to jokingly (or maybe not so jokingly) suggesting lawyers should have to wear body cams, too.Steve and Troy read through some of the most interesting and heated comments, talk about the realities of being a cop (and a lawyer), and spill on what body cams really mean for transparency and trust. Plus, challenges, the laughter, and the legal headaches this tech brings. Here are 3 key takeaways:Transparency Matters: When police turn off body cams mid-investigation, it raises suspicion—even if no wrongdoing occurred. As Steve Palmer notes, "It just doesn't look good" and creates an appearance of impropriety, which can impact public trust and courtroom defense.Practical Challenges Exist: Body cam footage is voluminous and costly to store and review. As Steve Palmer shares, legal teams now deal with hours of video and significant storage needs; charging fees for public record requests is becoming standard.Not All Recording Is Equal: While some suggested lawyers should wear body cams too, attorney-client privilege means confidential communications can't be recorded like police interactions. Protecting client privacy remains paramount.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

If you want to know how to navigate police encounters and what actually happens when you challenge a stop, you're in the right place! Straight from your comments on TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram! In this episode, host Steve Palmer and law student Troy Hendrickson talk about what happens when police stop you and ask for ID. Do officers have to tell you why they've pulled you over? What counts as "reasonable suspicion" for a stop—and should you push back on the street or wait for your day in court? From Supreme Court precedent to practical advice if you find yourself face-to-face with law enforcement, Steve Palmer shares the ins and outs of your rights, while Troy Hendrickson brings real-world scenarios to the table. Moments00:00 "Sovereign Citizen Rabbit Hole"06:20 "Legal Defense Against Drug Charges"09:14 "LawyerTalk: Advice and Insights"Top 3 takeaways:Police aren’t legally required to disclose their reasonable suspicion during a stop. Steve clarifies: while officers should explain why they’re stopping you, there’s no law forcing them to disclose their suspicion to you on the street.It’s often safer to comply and contest in court later. As tempting as it might be to debate an officer roadside, fighting or arguing in the moment can escalate the situation. Steve Palmer suggests saving your arguments for court, where legal professionals can protect your rights.You don't have to forfeit your rights to challenge a stop. Even if you comply during a questionable stop, your lawyer can later raise a suppression issue in court. Protect yourself by staying calm—and letting a legal expert handle the fight.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Tyler Robinson Case Study: Legal Obligations, Evidence Analysis, and Death Penalty DefenseLaw student Troy Hendrickson joins Steve Palmer for a candid, off-the-cuff Q&A session inspired by listener questions from recent episodes. They are discussing the complexities of high-profile legal cases. Specifically, one involving a full confession through text messages, forensic evidence, and the looming possibility of the death penalty. Steve breaks down why even seemingly straightforward cases can turn into intricate legal battles. They discuss everything from the importance of rigorously verifying evidence and the role of defense attorneys to the pressures of public scrutiny and the vital need to uphold legal protections for everyone, no matter the circumstances. Whether you’re a legal enthusiast or just curious about how the justice system really works behind the headlines, this episode will give you a deeper look at the challenges and responsibilities involved in defending high-stakes criminal cases. Moments00:00 DNA Evidence and Reasonable Doubt04:13 Death Penalty Legal Process Explained07:11 "Protecting Legal Rights for All"Key Takeaways:Key Takeaways:Every Detail Matters: Even if the prosecution has what appears to be a “full confession” and rock-solid forensic evidence (like DNA and fingerprints), defense attorneys are obligated to examine every piece of evidence. Just because it "quacks like a duck," as Steve Palmer puts it, doesn't mean it shouldn't be verified.Complexity is More Than Evidence: High-profile cases—especially those involving the death penalty—require meticulous review not just of the facts, but of legal, scientific, and social angles. Defense teams often engage experts, from forensic analysts to mitigation specialists, to ensure every aspect is covered.Public Outrage Raises the Stakes: When cases land in the public spotlight, the pressure to “skip to the end” is real. Still, as criminal defense lawyers, the duty is to uphold every legal protection, regardless of public sentiment, so the integrity of the justice system is preserved for everyone.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast...

Whether you agree or disagree, there’s a lot to unpack and discuss about your rights—and the realities—during a traffic stop. Let’s get into it.I sit down with law student Troy Hendrickson to tackle a question I’ve noticed popping up everywhere on social media: Do you really have to get out of your car when the police tell you to? After watching numerous viral videos of people refusing officers’ orders during traffic stops, I decided it was time to demystify the legal history behind this scenario—especially the Supreme Court case Pennsylvania v. Mimms.I explain why, yes, you do have to follow police instructions in these situations (even if you disagree), and why the courtroom—not the side of the road—is where you should fight any questionable police conduct. Along the way, Troy and I explore the wider issues: officer safety, misunderstandings about the law, and the rise of misinformation online. Here are 3 key takeaways you should know:You must comply if ordered out of your vehicle. Thanks to the Supreme Court decision in Pennsylvania v. Mims (1977), police can lawfully order you out of your car during a stop, even for minor violations.The fight happens in court—not on the roadside. Challenging a police order (even if you think it’s unfair or unlawful) on the street will result in arrest or worse. “You’re going to lose that fight…and a window.”Understanding why is crucial. These rules are based on “officer safety” and the structure of the rule of law. If you think your rights were violated, work with an attorney after the fact.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

If you’ve ever wondered whether just carrying a large sum of cash could land you in legal hot water—or what steps you can take if it happens to you—this episode is a must-listen.Host Steve Palmer is joined by Troy Hendrickson, a law student, to tackle the not-so-theoretical question: What really happens if the police take your cash during a routine traffic stop?Steve and Troy unravel the complexities behind asset forfeiture, sharing real-life cases where drivers have had tens of thousands of dollars seized by law enforcement—sometimes with little explanation or due process. Together, discuss the legal procedures that should protect your property rights, what “due process” really means in these situations, and how a legal team actually fights to recover seized money.They also dig into the difference between criminal charges and civil asset forfeiture, dispel myths about what cash in your car “proves,” and highlight the burdens of proof on both sides. Plus, they candidly share the frustrations and realities of navigating police departments, public records, and the sometimes slow-moving wheels of justice.Moments00:00 "Due Process and Contraband Notices"03:57 Criminal Indictment and Asset Forfeiture07:01 "Seeking Legal Help"09:48 "Money Laundering Charges Negotiation"13:58 Drug Mule Traffic Stop Explained17:13 Money Possession Isn't Criminal22:54 Roadside Bribe in Costa RicaHere are 3 key takeaways you should know:Due Process Should Prevail (But Doesn’t Always): The system is supposed to require official notice and a chance to fight for your seized property. But real-world cases often leave people in limbo, unable to get a straight answer or their assets back without taking legal action.Just Having Cash Is Not a Crime: Simply possessing large sums of money—even if it sets off police suspicions—is not illegal. The government needs something more than "it looks fishy" or "a dog sniffed it" to justify permanent seizure.Challenging Seizure Is Complicated and Costly: To recover seized money, you often have to initiate a civil lawsuit, shouldering the burden to prove it's your property and that the government is holding it. This process can be lengthy, expensive, and stacked against innocent owners.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast...

If you’re curious about the machinery of high-stakes criminal trials, want to understand the strategy behind post-conviction moves, or just love hearing behind-the-scenes details from seasoned legal minds, this episode’s for you. Welcome back to Lawyer Talk, where legal education meets real-world controversy! In this episode, host Steve Palmer teams up with law student Troy Hendrickson for a special "law school edition" focused on the high-profile P Diddy trial. The guys dig into the nitty gritty of what happens between conviction and sentencing, breaking down the so-called “throwaway” post-trial motions and whether they ever actually work.From LeBron James’ famous party quote to the real implications of a compromise verdict, Steve and Troy peel back the layers of legal strategy used in Diddy’s defense—discussing grand juries, jury instructions, and the difference between a good argument and a long shot. They also cover why lawyers sometimes file motions more for publicity than for results, and what kind of jail time credit Diddy might expect after almost two years behind bars.Moments00:00 "Strategic 'Throwaway' Court Motions"04:42 "Trial Objections and Appeals"06:47 "Always Object in Court"10:14 "Grand Jury's Role Examined"14:50 "Prosecutorial Misconduct Claim Raised"16:54 Sentencing Guidelines and Considerations19:39 "Struggling for Connection"3 Key Takeaways:Post-Trial Motions Matter (But Aren’t Magic Bullets):Defense attorneys often file motions for a new trial between conviction and sentencing. While many see these as “throwaway” or strategic filings, sometimes they’re essential for preserving arguments or highlighting egregious errors like jury misconduct.Grand Jury Isn’t Always a Shield:The episode highlights how the grand jury process, intended as a safeguard against baseless charges, is often procedural rather than protective. Prosecutors nearly always get indictments—even with flimsy evidence—making it challenging for defendants facing stacked charges.Publicity & Sentencing Strategy:High-profile cases come with unique challenges. Lawyers might file post-conviction motions not just for legal reasons, but also to shape public perception. Additionally, sentencing memoranda and jail-time credit play big roles in the ultimate outcome, sometimes overlooked in law school teachings.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

If you want to know what goes into courtroom decision-making when the pressure is on, you’ll want to hear this one.Welcome back to Lawyer Talk! I'm Steve Palmer, and in this episode, I’m giving you an inside look at a recent trial I just finished—one that didn’t have a jury. Instead, my client and I made the tough decision to waive his right to a jury trial, choosing to have a judge decide his fate. I’ll walk you through exactly why I rarely take cases in front of just a judge, what made this case unique, and the careful reasoning behind our strategy—especially when there are tricky legal technicalities involved. I’ll also share some thoughts on what it really means to get a fair trial, whether it’s with a jury or a judge. Three key takeaways:Strategic Choice Matters: Opting for a bench (judge-only) trial can be the right path when a case hinges on a nuanced, technical legal issue that a jury might not fully grasp.Deep Client Collaboration: The decision isn’t made lightly. It involves honest conversations about risks, pros, and cons, making sure the client is 100% involved all the way.Presentation Still Counts: While the theatrics are toned down for a judge, it’s crucial to present evidence clearly and treat the judge as the "fact finder"—advocating with the same intensity as if speaking to a jury.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

On this episode of Lawyer Talk, I’m going off the record and on the air to answer the many questions I’ve been getting about the Tyler Robinson case, which is making headlines for its connection to the Charlie Kirk assassination. I’ll be clearing up some misunderstandings about the evidence—especially when it comes to fingerprints and DNA—and giving you a clearer picture of what the legal process looks like from here. I’ll also share my take on what it’s really like to defend someone in a high-profile case like this, from dealing with the media circus to the practical challenges lawyers face behind the scenes. Top Takeaways:Evidence Scrutiny is Critical:Defense attorneys always start by dissecting the prosecution's evidence—including DNA, fingerprints, and the context surrounding them. As Steve notes, just because certain evidence is cited in a probable cause affidavit doesn’t make the case airtight; robust discovery and expert analysis are essential.Taking on Death Penalty Defense is a Massive Undertaking:These cases can last well over a year and consume significant resources. Most are handled by private lawyers appointed (and underpaid) by the state, not full-time public defenders, which can impact their own legal practices.Expertise and Resources Make or Break the Case:Successfully defending a death penalty case often requires applying for court-approved experts in forensics, cell phone data, and beyond. The responsibility is immense—not only for the client, but for the integrity of the justice process.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com