The Supreme Court considers questions of mitigating evidence and jury bias arising from the trial of one of the Boston Marathon bombers.
The federal government and two pain management physicians argue about the meaning of the text in the Controlled Substances Act.
Abortion proponents and pro-life advocates battle it out at the Supreme Court over Mississippi’s law that protects unborn life after 15 weeks’ gestation.
A new Mississippi law protects unborn life after 15 weeks’ gestation. The only abortion provider in the state sued, arguing the law is a direct affront to Supreme Court precedent.
A famous courtroom artist tells the little-known aspects of his craft, beyond the colorful sketches that you can see.
A football coach sued his school district when the school prohibited him from offering a prayer on the field after games.
A man concerned for his own safety sought a license to carry a gun outside his home. But a New York judge said no to him while other judges said yes to others arguably less qualified.
A former Taco Bell employee sued her employer for unpaid wages. She wants to keep her battle in court, but the employer wants to force arbitration.
A man on death row wants his pastor with him in the execution chamber, but he had to sue the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to get it.
Abortion, guns, religion—our third season covers it all. Get personal with a Supreme Court artist. Understand how the latest decisions from our nation's highest court shape our immediate futures.
Patent law and administrative law intersect in this case that raises a question about the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
The new 2021-2022 term of the US Supreme Court is upon us. Today, you’ll hear previews of several cases the justices will decide this term. Those include decisions about abortion, free speech, unequal treatment of religious schools, second amendment rights, and more.
When the attorney general of California sought confidential information about charitable donors, charities on the left and the right fought back.
Former child slaves on West African cocoa farms sue U.S. chocolate companies. The case examines whether the Alien Tort Statute covers those claims.
A cheerleader’s vulgar post on social media lands her in trouble with the school, but judicial precedent from the 1960s and the First Amendment protects her right to free speech
Find out what it's like to work as a law clerk for a Supreme Court justice. In this episode, hosts Mary Reichard and Jenny Rough talk with five law clerks, plus a Marshal's aide, for an inside peek at what goes on when the court is not in session.
Indian tribes are considered a nation within a nation. U.S. v Cooley looks at how much authority a tribe's law enforcement has to investigate crimes by non-Indians on its reservation.
Religious Liberty and emerging LGBT rights clash when the city of Philadelphia excludes Catholic Social Services from placing children with foster families.
Hosts Jenny Rough and Mary Reichard analyze an 8th Amendment case, cruel and unusual punishment. In 2005, Brett Jones killed his grandfather. He was 15. The Supreme Court looks at what is required before a juvenile can receive a life without parole sentence.
Hosts Mary Reichard and Jenny Rough analyze a case of simple facts and complicated law. In 2014, college student James King is beaten up by FBI agents who had the wrong guy. Now in 2021, he still hasn’t received recompense for his damages after going all the way to the US Supreme Court.
Ruth P Hammer
This episode is full of legal information for the uninitiated, with strong emotional overtones, and a challenge to think through the issues. Good job, World Magazine, for this great presentation!
Steve Johnson
As an educator I find this case to be interesting and quite relevant
Nancy Herrera
Another of my favorite podcasts from WORLD Radio!
Paul Jackson
This is great Podcast. You will want to hear every episode
J W
The head of the judicial system, which is usually shrouded in legalistic language, is brought into sharp focus. An especially important focus at this point in history, when the supreme court has attained a level of political power it was never meant to have. I wish this podcast would spark a new genre of layman-level podcasts that illuminate the judicial workings of other countries as well. Informative. Entertaining. Important. I will be awaiting the 2nd season.