Movie of the Year: 1971KluteWhy Klute Still Captivates AudiencesIn this episode of Movie of the Year, Ryan, Greg, and Mike examine Klute, Alan J. Pakula’s groundbreaking 1971 thriller that fused noir, feminist character study, and political paranoia into a single atmospheric masterpiece. From its haunting portrayal of loneliness to its razor-sharp critique of power and control, Klute remains one of the most influential films of the 1970s — a tense, stylish, and unsettling work anchored by unforgettable performances.The Taste Buds explore how Klute uses mood, silence, and perspective to reimagine what a thriller can be, and why its themes still resonate decades later.Pakula and Willis: Crafting the Look and Fear of KluteAlan J. Pakula, working with cinematographer Gordon Willis, created in Klute what would become the visual and tonal blueprint for 1970s paranoia cinema. The Taste Buds discuss how the Pakula/Willis partnership shaped not only this film, but future classics as well.Pakula’s direction emphasizes psychological distance, moral ambiguity, and bureaucratic dread.Willis — the legendary “Prince of Darkness” — saturates the film with deep shadows, cold light, and voyeuristic framing that makes the audience feel watched.The collaboration results in a thriller where silence is suspense, space is threat, and every frame hints at danger you can’t quite see.This visual strategy becomes the DNA of Pakula’s later films, but Klute is where the paranoia begins.Bree Daniels: Jane Fonda’s Defining PerformanceNo element of Klute is more celebrated than Jane Fonda’s performance as Bree Daniels, a character whose complexity transformed the possibilities for female roles in crime and thriller cinema.Ryan, Greg, and Mike explore how Bree’s character:serves as the emotional center of Klutenavigates trauma, agency, sexuality, and survivalresists the stereotypes typically imposed on sex workersexpresses her inner life most vividly in her therapy scenes, where the film slows down and lets Bree define herself in her own wordsFonda delivers a portrait of a woman who is both vulnerable and fiercely self-aware — a character fighting for autonomy in a world designed to control her.John Klute: Donald Sutherland’s Quiet DetectiveWhile Bree is the heart of the film, Donald Sutherland’s John Klute is the unstable axis around which the mystery turns. His restrained, almost withdrawn performance contrasts sharply with Bree’s vivid emotional life.The Taste Buds discuss how John Klute:subverts noir detective tropes by being passive rather than dominantreflects the unease and disillusionment of early 1970s masculinitybecomes both protector and threat, comfort and menaceheightens the film’s tension simply by what he doesn’t sayHis quietness becomes the film’s most unsettling element — the fear that danger might come not from action, but from inaction.Klute's Themes: Power, Paranoia, and the Performance of IdentityThe Taste Buds analyze the movie as a story deeply invested in the forces that shape who we become and how we behave:Power — who has it, who wants it, who is crushed by itParanoia — the constant hum of surveillance that defines the film’s worldIdentity and performance — especially in Bree’s...
Movie of the Year: 1971MixtapeThe Mixtape Reaches Its Final FormIn the second and final installment of the Movie of the Year: Mixtape 1971, Mike, Greg, Ryan, and special guest Taylor reunite to complete the ultimate playlist of songs released in 1971. What began as a nostalgic, free-wheeling journey through one of the greatest years in music now becomes a decisive act of curation. Each Taste Bud must make their final selections, shaping the last pieces of a mixtape that captures the sound, soul, and spirit of 1971.This isn’t a draft. This isn’t a competition. It’s a collaborative act of musical archaeology—a mission to create a playlist worthy of an era that changed everything.Finishing the Playlist: Drama, Dissent, and DedicationThe tension rises as the Taste Buds fill the final open slots on the mixtape. The stakes aren’t about winning—they’re about getting it right. Which tracks deserve early placement? Which songs have earned the privilege of closing out the mix? And which hidden gems from 1971 demand to be heard?With every selection, the Mixtape becomes more defined and more surprising, balancing iconic hits with deep cuts, genre-spanning favorites, and songs that shaped both cinema and culture.This episode leans into the drama: passionate defenses, sudden reversals, and the kind of decisive playlist-building energy that only the Taste Buds can bring.The Themes That Emerged from 1971As the Mixtape locks into place, the Taste Buds uncover the unexpected themes that emerged from their selections.Rebellion and protest—echoes of a generation reckoning with war, justice, and identity.Introspection and vulnerability—songwriters unearthing new emotional territory.Genre expansion—rock, soul, folk, funk, and country all exploding in new directions.Together, these tracks tell a story of a year that didn’t just produce great music—it reshaped the cultural landscape.Guest Spotlight: Taylor Returns for the FinaleSpecial guest Taylor returns for Part Two, bringing strong musical instincts and a fearless approach to finishing the playlist. Her choices add emotional depth, tonal variety, and bold color to the final tracklist—helping shape Mixtape 1971 into something that feels alive, resonant, and unmistakably right.Conclusion: The Definitive 1971 MixtapeWith the final songs selected and the playlist complete, Mixtape 1971 stands as a testament to the sound of the era—rebellious, soulful, experimental, and unforgettable. Whether you lived through it or discovered it decades later, these tracks offer a time capsule of a world changing in real time.🎧 Listen now to the dramatic conclusion of Mixtape 1971 and experience the playlist as it comes together moment by moment.📬 Email your own 1971 song selections—or your personal Mixtape 1971—to popfilterco@gmail.com.🔔 And don’t forget to subscribe to Movie of the Year for more 1971 episodes, deep dives, and debates.
Movie of the Year: 1971MixtapeThe Sound of 1971The Taste Buds are trading film reels for vinyl grooves in this week’s episode of Movie of the Year, as Mike, Greg, Ryan, and special guest Taylor create the ultimate 1971 Mixtape. It’s the year of protest songs, psychedelic experimentation, soul anthems, and singer-songwriter confessionals—and the Taste Buds are here to decide which tracks define it all.Each host takes turns drafting their favorite songs from 1971 and placing them into the perfect playlist order. What emerges is not just a collection of hits, but a sonic time capsule—capturing the emotion, rebellion, and rhythm of a year when music and culture collided in unforgettable ways.The Rules of the MixtapeHere’s how it works:Only songs released in 1971 are eligible.Each participant takes a turn selecting a song. The chooser not only selects the song but also decides where it goes in the lineup, although the choosers of the opener and closer are pre-determined. The result? A carefully chaotic playlist that reflects the Taste Buds’ unique blend of passion, humor, and deep-cut expertise.The Music of 1971: A Revolution on Record1971 wasn’t just another year in music—it was a creative explosion. From the poetic introspection of the singer-songwriter era to the gritty pulse of funk and soul, 1971 became a soundtrack to a generation in transition.As the Taste Buds debate their picks, they uncover how the sounds of this year—across rock, R&B, country, and beyond—captured the cultural aftershocks of the 1960s and set the stage for the music that defined the decade to come.Whether it’s an anthem of rebellion or a quiet moment of heartbreak, every song chosen for the 1971 Mixtape tells part of the story of who we were, and who we were becoming.Guest Spotlight: Taylor Joins the MixtapeThis episode features special guest Taylor, who brings his own distinctive taste and flair to the playlist. A longtime friend of the show and a sharp musical mind, Taylor adds energy, insight, and a few unexpected curveballs to the draft. His picks remind the crew—and listeners—why music isn’t just heard, it’s felt.Conclusion: Press Play on the PastBy the end of the episode, the Taste Buds have built something more than a playlist—they’ve created a living archive of sound, heart, and memory. The 1971 Mixtape is a reminder of why this era of music still resonates, decades later: it was honest, fearless, and timeless.🎧 Listen now to hear Mike, Greg, Ryan, and Taylor craft the ultimate 1971 Mixtape. Subscribe to Movie of the Year, and email your own playlist picks to popfilterco@gmail.com—because your favorite 1971 song deserves a spot on the record.
Movie of the Year: 1971The ConformistRevisiting The Conformist (1971) – Power and Identity in Italian CinemaIn this episode of Movie of the Year, Ryan, Greg, and Nate take on Bernardo Bertolucci’s The Conformist (1971), a visual and psychological masterpiece that defined the aesthetics of 1970s cinema. Through its haunting beauty and moral ambiguity, The Conformist examines how a man’s need to belong leads him down a path of destruction.As the Taste Buds explore, Bertolucci’s film is more than a political allegory—it’s an intimate portrait of repression, desire, and the fragile nature of identity.Bertolucci’s The Conformist and the Politics of StyleFew filmmakers balance ideology and artistry as masterfully as Bernardo Bertolucci. The Taste Buds discuss how his direction turns politics into visual poetry, using color, shadow, and architecture to mirror the internal lives of his characters.Cinematographer Vittorio Storaro creates a world of geometric perfection and emotional chaos, where fascist Italy becomes both stage and metaphor. Every shot in The Conformist (1971) is deliberate—an expression of control, guilt, and the terror of individual thought in a conformist world.(Learn more about Bertolucci’s visual approach on Criterion’s Bertolucci essay.)Marcello Clerici: The Psychology of FascismAt the center of The Conformist is Marcello Clerici, portrayed by Jean-Louis Trintignant with quiet dread. Marcello longs to fit in, to appear normal, to bury the parts of himself that don’t conform. His fear of difference drives him toward fascism—not out of conviction, but out of insecurity.Ryan, Greg, and Nate explore how Marcello’s repression and guilt become political acts. His story reveals how ordinary people become instruments of ideology—not through belief, but through cowardice and the seductive comfort of belonging.Anna and Giulia: Women, Desire, and RebellionThe women of The Conformist (1971)—Anna (Dominique Sanda) and Giulia (Stefania Sandrelli)—represent opposing forces in Marcello’s life and Italy’s cultural psyche. Anna is sharp, enigmatic, and politically aware—a woman whose defiance threatens to unravel Marcello’s carefully constructed identity. Giulia is complacent, beautiful, and submissive, embodying the illusion of safety and control.The Taste Buds analyze how Bertolucci frames both women as agents of desire and symbols of rebellion, showing that even within oppressive systems, resistance can take many forms—some loud, others quietly devastating.Guest Spotlight: Nate Ragolia from Debut BuddiesThis episode features special guest Nate Ragolia, co-host of the hit podcast Debut Buddies. Known for celebrating pop-culture firsts—from debut albums to first films—Nate brings his trademark blend of insight and humor to The Conformist (1971). His deep appreciation for cinema’s evolution adds a new dimension to the discussion, connecting Bertolucci’s exploration of identity and conformity to the creative risks artists still face today.🎧 Check out Debut Buddies wherever you get podcasts to hear Nate’s take on the beginnings of cultural phenomena.FAQ: The Conformist (1971) ExplainedWho directed The Conformist (1971)?Italian filmmaker Bernardo Bertolucci directed The Conformist, adapting it from Alberto Moravia’s novel of the same name.What is The Conformist...
Movie of the Year: 1971WandaRediscovering Wanda (1971) – A Landmark of Feminist CinemaIn this episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—begin their deep dive into 1971 cinema with Barbara Loden’s raw, groundbreaking film, Wanda. Once dismissed and now celebrated as a cornerstone of feminist filmmaking, Wanda (1971) captures the alienation and quiet rebellion of a woman trying to survive in a world that refuses to see her.For movie lovers and film historians alike, this episode explores how Wanda transformed independent film, redefined the female gaze, and challenged the capitalist structures of both life and art.The Character of Wanda: Feminism and Alienation in 1971 CinemaAt the heart of Wanda (1971) lies a protagonist unlike any other. Wanda Goronski, portrayed by Barbara Loden herself, is a woman out of step with the world around her—drifting through Pennsylvania coal country with little purpose, no plan, and even less hope.The Taste Buds explore how Wanda’s detachment becomes a quiet act of resistance. She isn’t empowered in the conventional sense, but her refusal to conform to the expectations of wifehood, motherhood, and labor gives her a radical presence. Her story asks: is true freedom even possible for someone like Wanda in a capitalist, patriarchal society?Barbara Loden’s Direction and Legacy in WandaBarbara Loden—actor, writer, and director—crafted Wanda as an intensely personal response to the limitations placed on women in both Hollywood and everyday life. The Taste Buds examine how her minimalist style and vérité realism broke from the conventions of the era, situating Wanda as one of the earliest examples of American independent cinema’s feminist movement.Shot on a shoestring budget with nonprofessional actors, Wanda captures authenticity without sentimentality. Loden’s direction feels lived-in, intimate, and unsparing—her camera refuses to judge Wanda even as society does. The Taste Buds discuss how Loden’s work paved the way for later filmmakers exploring identity, alienation, and the female experience.Feminism vs. Capitalism: The Political Core of WandaWanda (1971) isn’t just a character study—it’s a political statement. The Taste Buds unpack how the film critiques the intersections of feminism and capitalism, showing how both liberation and exploitation exist within the same system.For Wanda, the American Dream is a nightmare: men exploit her, work dehumanizes her, and freedom always comes with a price. The Taste Buds discuss how Wanda’s raw honesty about poverty, gender, and survival resonates today, reflecting an America where independence remains conditional and fleeting.FAQ: Wanda (1971) on Movie of the YearWho directed Wanda (1971)?Barbara Loden wrote, directed, and starred in Wanda, making it a pioneering example of feminist independent cinema.Why is Wanda considered a feminist film?It rejects Hollywood’s idealized portrayals of women, instead depicting a complex, flawed woman navigating systemic oppression and limited choices.Where can I watch Wanda (1971)?Wanda is available through the Criterion Collection and select streaming platforms dedicated to classic and independent cinema.Conclusion: Why Wanda Still MattersMore than fifty years later, Wanda (1971) endures as a defining work of feminist and independent filmmaking. With Barbara Loden’s fearless direction and the haunting performance at its core,...
Movie of the Year: 1971The 16 Films Are ChosenThe Battle Heats UpIn Part Two of the Movie of the Year: 1971 season, the Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—return to slice the bracket from 64 films down to 16. What began as a celebration of early-1970s experimentation has become a cinematic bloodbath. This is where masterpieces clash, cult favorites fall, and only the strongest survive.1971 continues to reveal its soul: a year defined by disillusionment, moral decay, and the desperate search for meaning in a changing world. The Taste Buds wrestle with these themes as they try to separate the timeless from the forgotten in one of the most volatile brackets in podcast history.The Cultural Turmoil of 1971The deeper the Taste Buds dive into 1971, the clearer it becomes that this was a year unlike any other. The optimism of the ’60s had curdled into cynicism; art was bleeding into protest, and filmmakers were pushing boundaries few dared cross.This episode isn’t just about elimination—it’s about exploration. Each cut exposes a tension between old Hollywood and the daring voices of New Hollywood. The moral clarity of the past gives way to ambiguity, violence, and alienation. Even in defeat, these films feel alive—vibrant reflections of a restless nation on the edge of transformation.The Bracket: From 64 to 16The Taste Buds take no prisoners as they slash the field in half. Beloved underdogs and prestigious heavyweights alike fall victim to the bracket’s brutality.The discussion spans the full spectrum of 1971 cinema—from intimate character studies to radical experiments in form. What emerges is a portrait of a year obsessed with freedom and consequence, where the line between hero and villain, beauty and ugliness, grows thinner with every decision.By the end, only 16 films remain—each a contender for the title of 1971 Movie of the Year.Conclusion: The Revolution ContinuesIf Part One was discovery, Part Two is devastation. The Taste Buds have drawn blood, but the fight is far from over. As 1971 reveals its cinematic DNA—grit, daring, and rebellion—the question grows sharper: what kind of film deserves to define an era?🎧 Listen now to Movie of the Year: 1971, Part Two. Subscribe, share your reactions, and email your predictions for the next round to popfilterco@gmail.com—because the bracket waits for no one, and 1971 isn’t done breaking hearts.
Movie of the Year: 1971A New Season BeginsWelcome to 1971—The Year Hollywood Broke the RulesThe Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—are back, and this time they’re traveling to one of the most daring and unpredictable years in film history: 1971. With the studio system collapsing and the counterculture in full swing, filmmakers were rewriting the rules, blending art and rebellion into something thrillingly new.In this season premiere, the Taste Buds launch the 1971 Movie of the Year bracket, cutting 96 movies down to 64 in a massive showdown of ambition, artistry, and pure cinematic chaos. From cult curiosities to forgotten gems, this first round is where history’s deep cuts get their moment in the spotlight.The Cultural Crossroads of 19711971 wasn’t just another year—it was a cultural collision. The Vietnam War raged, Nixon ruled the airwaves, and young directors were taking cameras into uncharted territory. As the Taste Buds remind us, this was the year American cinema shifted from polished studio spectacle to gritty realism, giving rise to New Hollywood.Every film in this season premiere carries that revolutionary spark. Some came from the underground; others from studios trying desperately to keep up with changing times. Together, they form a portrait of a moment when film wasn’t just entertainment—it was rebellion.Deep Cuts and Dangerous Roads: The Films of Round OneBefore the heavy hitters arrive in later rounds, the Taste Buds dig into the unsung heroes of 1971—the strange, the soulful, and the subversive.Two-Lane Blacktop: A road movie stripped down to its raw nerves, where the open highway is both promise and punishment.Wake in Fright: An Australian fever dream that makes the outback feel like purgatory.The Hired Hand: Peter Fonda’s quiet Western about regret, redemption, and a way of life that’s already dying.Taking Off: Miloš Forman’s offbeat exploration of American youth, alienation, and generational divide.Each of these films tells part of the story of 1971: a year where cinema stopped being polite and started getting real.The Bracket BeginsWith 96 contenders on the board, the Taste Buds must make impossible choices. Which obscure masterpieces deserve to advance? Which early casualties will haunt the rest of the season? The first round is brutal, brilliant, and full of surprises—as only a Movie of the Year bracket can be.The Revolution Will Be Screened1971 was a year of upheaval, experimentation, and discovery—and this season premiere captures that spirit perfectly. As the Taste Buds trim the list to 64, they set the stage for one of the richest and most unpredictable seasons in Movie of the Year history.🎧 Listen now to the Movie of the Year: 1971 Season Premiere. Subscribe to the show, share your bracket predictions, and email your early favorites to popfilterco@gmail.com—because the revolution of 1971 has just begun, and only one film will rise to the top.
Movie of the Year: 1999The Grand Finale (Finale)The End of the 1999 RoadThe moment has arrived. After months of debates, shocking eliminations, and unforgettable arguments, the 1999 Movie of the Year Finale comes to its climactic conclusion. The Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—step into the ring one last time to decide which film will take home the crown as the ultimate 1999 Movie of the Year. Two iconic movies remain. Only one will survive.The Final Showdown: The Best of 1999The bracket began with dozens of contenders, but it is now down to two giants. The Taste Buds give every moment the dramatic weight it deserves, breaking down performances, set pieces, and cultural impact. Expect arguments that land like body slams, counterpoints that hit like steel chairs, and a final decision that could shock listeners everywhere. The question remains: Which 1999 film will become the undisputed champion?The Ultimate 1999 AwardsBefore the crown is placed, the Taste Buds hand out the most outrageous and most coveted awards of the season. These categories highlight the wild, unforgettable moments that made 1999 a year like no other:Best SexBest ViolenceBest Musical MomentBest ActorBest ActressEach award sparks passionate debate, hilarious takes, and surprising winners, ensuring the finale delivers both celebration and chaos.FAQ About the 1999 Finale PodcastWhat is the 1999 Movie of the Year?The Taste Buds crown the single film that defines 1999 as the greatest movie year of all time.Which awards are given in the finale?The finale features awards for Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Sex Scene, Best Violence, and Best Musical Moment.Who are the Taste Buds?Mike, Ryan, and Greg—hosts of the Movie of the Year Podcast, where movies battle for cultural immortality.A Crown Worth Fighting For1999 gave us masterpieces, cult classics, and blockbusters that defined a generation. But only one film can be crowned 1999 Movie of the Year. Will it be the movie with the strongest performances? The wildest twist? The boldest direction? The Taste Buds decide, and the final verdict is in.Listen now to Part Three of the finale. Subscribe to Movie of the Year, share the episode with fellow movie lovers, and email us your reactions at popfilterco@gmail.com. Did the Taste Buds get it right, or did your pick for Best 1999 Movie get robbed? Let the debate continue.
Movie of the Year: 1999The Grand Finale (Part 2)The Road to the FinalsThe bracket heats up in Part Two of the 1999 Movie of the Year Finale, and the Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—are back to call every twist, turn, and cinematic takedown. The stakes are higher, the drama is bigger, and the films are fighting harder than ever for a shot at the crown.The Matchups: Semi-Final ShowdownsOnly four films remain, and the battles are fierce:Election vs. The Blair Witch Project – Tracy Flick’s cutthroat ambition goes head-to-head with supernatural terror in the woods. It’s satire vs. found footage, politics vs. paranoia.The Limey vs. The Green Mile – Steven Soderbergh’s stylish revenge story steps into the ring with Frank Darabont’s heartbreaking prison epic. Vengeance clashes with miracles, grit with grace.The Taste Buds don’t just break down the movies—they hype them up like a championship bout, with every argument landing like a body slam.Special Awards: Comedic Performance, On-Screen Duo & Biggest ShitheadAs if the semi-finals weren’t enough, the Taste Buds also reveal the winners of three special 1999 honors:Best Comedic PerformanceBest On-Screen DuoBiggest ShitheadThe nominees are under wraps, but the winners will spark laughs, debates, and maybe even outrage.Conclusion: The Fight Isn’t Over YetThe road to the 1999 Movie of the Year crown gets narrower, but the drama only intensifies. Will Election’s political claws cut down the terror of The Blair Witch Project? Can The Limey’s revenge stand tall against The Green Mile’s miracles?🎧 Listen now to Part Two of the 1999 finale, subscribe to Movie of the Year so you don’t miss the grand conclusion, and email your predictions to popfilterco@gmail.com—because only one movie will survive.
Movie of the Year: 1999The Grand Finale (Part 1)The Bracket Battles BeginIn this high-stakes episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—step into the ring for Part One of the 1999 Finale. The mission: to complete the bracket and crown the ultimate 1999 Movie of the Year. The energy is off the charts, the drama is turned up to eleven, and every matchup is a fight for cinematic survival.The Matchups: Clash of the 1999 TitansEight legendary films enter, but only four will survive this round:Fight Club vs. The Iron Giant – A brutal, brawling philosophy lesson takes on animated heart and heroism.Run Lola Run vs. Notting Hill – Adrenaline-fueled German precision sprints headlong into British charm and rom com delight.Election vs. The Blair Witch Project – Satire and scheming clash with found-footage horror that redefined fear.The Limey vs. The Green Mile – Soderbergh’s fractured revenge tale faces off against Darabont’s prison-set epic of miracles and loss.The Taste Buds call every blow, every twist, every knockout punch on the way to the semifinals.Best Supporting Actor and Best Supporting Actress AwardsAs if the bracket wasn’t enough, the Taste Buds also hand out their 1999 Best Supporting Actor and Best Supporting Actress Awards. The nominees? You’ll have to listen to find out—but expect iconic performances, shocking picks, and plenty of heated debate.The Drama of 1999 CinemaThis isn’t just a podcast—it’s a war for cinematic supremacy. With every argument, joke, and hot take, the Taste Buds bring the kind of passion that only 1999 movies deserve. These films didn’t just entertain—they defined an era, and now they fight for the ultimate crown.Call to Action: Who Wins Your Bracket?Now it’s your turn, listeners! 🎧Listen now to the 1999 Movie of the Year Finale, Part One.Subscribe to the Movie of the Year Podcast for the next two parts of the finale.Email us at popfilterco@gmail.com with your predictions, your favorite supporting performances, and your pick for the 1999 Movie of the Year.Conclusion: The Road to the Crown Begins HereFrom Fight Club to The Green Mile, from supporting legends to surprise underdogs, Part One of the 1999 Movie of the Year Finale has it all. The Taste Buds bring the drama, the laughs, and the ultimate passion as the greatest year in movies fights for its champion.🎧 Step into the ring—because this is only the beginning.
Movie of the Year: 1999Notting Hill (feat. John Brooks from 1999: The Podcast!) Revisiting Notting Hill (1999)In this episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds watch Notting Hill (1999), the beloved romantic comedy pairing Hugh Grant and Julia Roberts. More than just a love story, Notting Hill combines sharp humor, traditional rom-com tropes, and a commentary on celebrity culture that remains resonant today. The Taste Buds break down why this film remains one of the defining romantic comedies of the late 1990s.The Ensemble in Notting Hill (1999)While the romance between Grant and Roberts takes the spotlight, Notting Hill is also a showcase for its ensemble cast. From Rhys Ifans’ unforgettable turn as Spike to the quirky group of friends who surround William Thacker, the ensemble adds heart, comedy, and texture to the story. The Taste Buds highlight how this cast transforms the film into a community tale, grounding the romance in authentic relationships.Rom Com Tropes in Notting HillAs a romantic comedy, Notting Hill embraces—and occasionally subverts—the genre’s staples. The Taste Buds dissect the meet-cute, the “will they/won’t they” dynamic, and the grand romantic gesture, exploring how Notting Hill both honors and updates these familiar rom-com beats. They also discuss how it compares to other best 1990s romantic comedies and why its formula still works today.Celebrity Culture and Notting Hill’s Love StoryAt its heart, Notting Hill is about ordinary life colliding with the world of celebrity culture. Julia Roberts’ character Anna Scott, a Hollywood superstar, struggles to build a relationship with William, a humble bookshop owner. The Taste Buds unpack how the film uses fame, privacy, and the media spotlight to complicate romance, showing both the allure and the challenges of dating under public scrutiny.Guest Panelist: John Brooks from 1999: The PodcastSpecial guest John Brooks, host of 1999: The Podcast, joins the panel to offer his expertise on late-‘90s pop culture and cinema. John provides insight into why Notting Hill connected so deeply with audiences in 1999, how it stacks up against other rom coms of the decade, and its lasting cultural impact. His contribution adds depth and historical perspective to the conversation.Bonus Segment: Eyes Wide Shut (1999)For a completely different take on love and intimacy in 1999, the Taste Buds dive into Stanley Kubrick’s enigmatic final film, Eyes Wide Shut. They explore its surreal look at marriage, secrecy, and desire, and contrast it with the lighthearted optimism of Notting Hill. Together, these two films showcase the remarkable range of cinema in 1999.FAQ About Notting Hill (1999) Podcast EpisodeWhat is Notting Hill about?It follows William, a bookshop owner, whose life changes when he falls for Anna Scott, a world-famous actress.Why is Notting Hill considered a classic rom-com?Its witty dialogue, memorable characters, and blend of romance and social commentary helped define the romantic comedy genre for a new era.Who stars in Notting Hill (1999)?Hugh Grant, Julia Roberts, Rhys Ifans, and a strong ensemble cast.Conclusion: Why Notting Hill Still CharmsMore than two decades later, Notting Hill (1999) remains one of the...
Movie of the Year: 1999The Limey (feat. Adam Kempenaar from Filmspotting)Why The Limey Still Packs a PunchIn this episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds turn their sights on The Limey (1999), Steven Soderbergh’s sharp revenge thriller about grief, family, and memory. Mixing classic crime tropes with experimental editing, The Limey is both a gripping noir and an impressionistic meditation on loss. With Terence Stamp delivering a career-defining performance, the film remains one of Soderbergh’s most daring works.1960s vs 1990s in The LimeyAt the heart of The Limey lies a conversation between two eras. Terence Stamp’s Wilson—a hardened ex-con from the swinging London of the 1960s—arrives in neon-soaked Los Angeles of the 1990s to uncover the truth about his daughter’s death. The Taste Buds discuss how the film contrasts the ideals, aesthetics, and morality of these decades, using Wilson’s journey as both a cultural clash and a generational reckoning.Steven Soderbergh’s Directing Style in The LimeyKnown for pushing boundaries, Steven Soderbergh infuses The Limey with fractured editing, nonlinear storytelling, and the haunting use of flashbacks. The Taste Buds break down how these stylistic choices elevate a standard revenge plot into a hypnotic piece of cinema. They also explore how The Limey connects to Soderbergh’s other 1999 classic, Out of Sight, and how his experimental style paved the way for his 2000s successes.Family, Revenge, and The Limey’s Emotional CoreWhile The Limey is structured like a thriller, its true heartbeat lies in themes of family and redemption. Wilson’s grief over his daughter and his desperate search for answers give the film unexpected emotional weight. The Taste Buds explore how family drives the story forward, turning vengeance into something deeply human and heartbreaking.Guest Panelist: Adam Kempenaar from FilmspottingJoining this week’s episode is Adam Kempenaar, host of the long-running podcast Filmspotting. Adam brings decades of cinephile experience and critical insight to the discussion, offering a deeper look at Soderbergh’s influence and the lasting cultural relevance of The Limey. His perspective helps connect the film to both classic noir traditions and contemporary cinema.Listen to Filmspotting here!Bonus Segment: 10 Things I Hate About You (1999)The Taste Buds balance The Limey’s brooding intensity with a bonus discussion of 10 Things I Hate About You, the teen comedy that reimagines Shakespeare for the 1990s. They break down the film’s clever script, breakout performances from Heath Ledger and Julia Stiles, and how it epitomizes the teen movie boom of the decade. Together, the two films showcase the remarkable range of 1999 cinema.FAQ About The Limey Podcast EpisodeWhat is The Limey (1999) about?The film follows Wilson (Terence Stamp), an ex-con who travels to Los Angeles to investigate his daughter’s mysterious death.Why is Steven Soderbergh’s style in The Limey unique?Through nonlinear editing, impressionistic flashbacks, and tonal shifts, Soderbergh transforms a revenge story into an artful meditation on grief and memory.Why is family important in the film?Wilson’s pursuit of justice is rooted in his...
Movie of the Year 1999The 1999 Primetime Movie DraftThe draft is back—and it’s time to finish building the ultimate 1999 TV network! In this second and final installment of the Movie of the Year Podcast’s 1999 TV Draft, the Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—return to battle it out for TV supremacy. With their first-round picks locked in from last week, the stakes are even higher as they fill out their lineups, argue over strategy, and fight for the crown of Prime-Time King.The Final Rounds: Completing the LineupsWith the children’s show, network sitcom, network drama, non-network scripted show, unscripted show, and wild card categories still in play, every choice matters. The snake draft continues, and this week’s episode sees the Taste Buds strategizing, scheming, and occasionally sabotaging each other to build the most unbeatable channel of 1999.Deep Dive: The Best TV Shows of 1999If the first half of the draft was about setting the foundation, this finale is all about going big. The hosts revisit 1999’s best shows with fresh context and clever analysis, highlighting why this year was such a groundbreaking moment in television. From the golden age of network dramas to the wild rise of reality TV, every pick is fueled by nostalgia—and more than a few heated debates.Who Really Won?After all the picks are in, the Taste Buds compare their completed lineups and make their cases for victory. Who built the channel that would have crushed the Nielsen ratings in 1999? Which draft choices aged like fine wine, and which ones were pure Y2K panic? Listen in to hear their verdicts—and then cast your own vote by emailing popfilterco@gmail.com with your pick for the winner.Nostalgia, Laughs, and the End of the DraftThis finale isn’t just about competition; it’s a celebration of the year that changed TV forever. The Taste Buds look back on the cultural impact of these shows, share behind-the-scenes trivia, and crack each other up along the way. It’s a perfect blend of humor, pop culture insight, and pure 1999 nostalgia.FAQ About the 1999 TV DraftWhat is a TV draft?Just like fantasy sports, but instead of athletes, you’re drafting TV shows to build your dream lineup.What categories do they draft?Each Taste Bud must pick:A children’s showA network sitcomA network dramaA non-network scripted showAn unscripted showA wild cardWho are the hosts?The Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—are your guides through all things pop culture, blending expertise and comedy in every episode.How can I join the fun?Subscribe to the podcast and email your own 1999 lineup—or vote on the winner—at popfilterco@gmail.com.The Grand Finale: A Trip Back to 1999Whether you’ve been following since Part 1 or are just jumping in now, this second episode delivers the laughs, debates, and nostalgia that make Movie of the Year a must-listen. From the draft drama to the final showdown, this is your ticket back to the golden era of television.Listen now, subscribe to the Movie of the Year Podcast, and share this epic two-part draft with every pop culture fan you know.
Movie of the Year 1999The 1999 Primetime Movie DraftWhat happens when you take the rules of fantasy sports and apply them to television? In this special Movie of the Year Podcast episode, the Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—compete in the 1999 TV Draft to create the most unbeatable prime-time lineup. Using a snake draft format, each Taste Bud must carefully choose shows across categories to form the ultimate channel designed to dominate ratings and win over viewers.How the 1999 TV Draft WorksHere’s the setup: each participant must draft six shows from 1999. The categories include:A children’s showA network sitcomA network dramaA non-network scripted showAn unscripted showA wild cardBy the end, the Taste Buds will have created three competing networks—and the audience gets to decide who built the strongest lineup.Best TV Shows of 1999: A Year of Prime-Time GoldThe year 1999 wasn’t just about Fight Club and The Sixth Sense—it was also a landmark year for television. From beloved children’s programming to edgy dramas and reality TV’s first wave, 1999 offered a wide spectrum of shows that shaped culture. This episode dives deep into the best TV shows of 1999, giving each pick context, nostalgia, and plenty of jokes.Who Won the Draft? Competitive Spirit in ActionThe Taste Buds argue passionately for their picks, roasting each other’s choices and defending their own. Which fictional lineup would have pulled the biggest Nielsen ratings? Which network would have ruled the late ‘90s? Tune in to hear who the panel thinks came out on top—and then email in your thoughts to popfilterco@gmail.com.Bonus Laughs and NostalgiaLike all good Movie of the Year episodes, this draft is more than competition—it’s a love letter to pop culture. The Taste Buds reflect on the impact of these shows, debate their legacies, and remind listeners why 1999 remains one of the most exciting years for TV.FAQ About the 1999 TV DraftWhat is a TV draft?A TV draft works just like a fantasy sports draft, except instead of players, you’re drafting TV shows to build the best possible lineup.What are the categories for this draft?Each Taste Bud must pick a children’s show, a network sitcom, a network drama, a non-network scripted show, an unscripted show, and a wild card.Who are the hosts of Movie of the Year?The Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—are longtime podcasters and pop culture experts who debate and laugh their way through movies, TV, and more.How can listeners participate?Subscribe, email in your own line-ups, or vote on who you think won by emailing popfilterco@gmail.com.Final Thoughts: The Ultimate 1999 Nostalgia TripWhether you grew up watching these shows or you’re discovering them for the first time, the 1999 TV Draft is a hilarious trip back to one of television’s most iconic years. With categories spanning all of prime time and a competitive snake draft format, the Taste Buds bring humor, analysis, and nostalgia to every pick.🎧 Listen now, subscribe to the Movie of the Year Podcast, and share this episode with fellow TV and pop culture fans.
Movie of the Year: 1999Three Kings (feat. Best Movie Year Ever author Brian Raftery!)In this episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds dive deep into Three Kings, the 1999 Gulf War satire movie directed by David O. Russell. Set in the aftermath of the Persian Gulf War, the film follows a group of U.S. soldiers—played by George Clooney, Ice Cube, and Mark Wahlberg—as they set out on a gold heist and instead face the moral complexities of war. This Three Kings movie blends action, comedy, and political commentary while paying homage to war films of the past.War and Morality in the 1999 Three Kings MovieWe explore how Three Kings uses the Gulf War setting to comment on U.S. foreign policy, the chaos of post-war Iraq, and the blurred lines between heroism and self-interest. The film is not just a war movie—it’s a war satire and a war comedy-drama rolled into one, making it a unique entry in late-90s cinema.David O. Russell’s Bold Directing StyleFrom unconventional camera techniques to sharp tonal shifts, Three Kings is a prime example of David O. Russell’s fearless filmmaking. We discuss how his approach, both on and off set, shaped the movie’s lasting legacy and why it stands apart from other Gulf War movies.Three King's Multicultural Cast Redefines the War GenreWith a diverse lineup that includes Clooney, Wahlberg, and Ice Cube, Three Kings challenges typical casting for war movies. We break down how the characters’ backgrounds and performances enhance the story’s authenticity and cultural reach.Guest Panelist: Brian RafteryJoining us is Brian Raftery, author of the upcoming book on Hannibal Lecter’s cinematic history. Brian also created the acclaimed Ringer mini-series Mission Accomplished, chronicling the making of Three Kings and the tension between David O. Russell and his cast. His behind-the-scenes insight adds depth you won’t find anywhere else.Find all of Brian Raftery's everything here, including his book Best. Year. Ever. How 1999 Blew Up The Big Screen. Bonus Segment: Magnolia (1999)As a special treat, the Taste Buds also discuss Paul Thomas Anderson’s sprawling epic Magnolia, another standout from the cinematic powerhouse year of 1999. They examine how both Magnolia and Three Kings reflect the ambitious, risk-taking spirit of late-90s filmmaking.Whether you’re a longtime fan or discovering it for the first time, our Three Kings podcast episode offers fresh insights into one of the boldest war films of the decade. Listen now to hear how this Gulf War satire still resonates today.
Movie of the Year: 1999The Sixth Sense (feat. Jay Sherer!)Chilling Classics and Narrative Genius in The Sixth SenseIn this spine-tingling episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds turn their third eyes toward M. Night Shyamalan’s unforgettable thriller, The Sixth Sense. Released in 1999, this film didn't just scare audiences—it redefined what moviegoers expected from psychological thrillers and suspenseful ghost stories. The Taste Buds examine what made The Sixth Sense an instant classic and how it continues to haunt and inspire audiences to this day.The Sixth Sense's Twist Ending: Spoiler Alert (Sort Of)You know the twist—but how did we get there? The Taste Buds break down the legendary ending of The Sixth Sense, discussing how Shyamalan masterfully planted clues throughout the film. This segment explores how the reveal reshaped the entire narrative, altered how we engage with movies, and elevated twist endings to a pop culture staple. It’s one of the most talked-about twist endings in cinematic history, and for good reason.Death and Horror in The Sixth Sense: What Scares Us MostAt its core, The Sixth Sense is a meditation on death, grief, and unresolved trauma. The Taste Buds explore how the film uses horror to probe deeper emotional truths, crafting scares not from jump cuts alone, but from the deeply human fear of being unseen and unheard. This is horror with heart—and it hits hard, echoing themes found in other 1999 horror films like The Blair Witch Project.The Sixth Sense Performances: Toni Collette Deserved an OscarBeyond its eerie mood and smart script, The Sixth Sense shines thanks to stunning performances. Haley Joel Osment delivers one of the most iconic child performances in movie history, and Bruce Willis brings a quiet depth to a role that surprises in more ways than one. The Taste Buds also spotlight Toni Collette’s heartbreaking turn as a mother grappling with the unknown. The performances anchor the film’s emotional weight and elevate the ghost story to something transcendent.Guest Panelist Jay Sherer: Talking Story with The Story GeeksThis week’s episode features special guest Jay Sherer, host of The Story Geeks Podcast. Jay brings his storytelling expertise and love for genre film to help unpack why The Sixth Sense is more than just a horror movie—it's a masterclass in character, pacing, and emotional resonance. Jay also draws fascinating comparisons to other narrative-driven films, such as Unbreakable and Signs.Bonus Segment: Enter Fight ClubIn a special bonus segment, the Taste Buds take on another 1999 mind-bender: Fight Club. What connects Fight Club and The Sixth Sense beyond their jaw-dropping endings? The Taste Buds compare their thematic undercurrents, narrative structures, and cultural impacts, offering fresh perspectives on how these two films reflect the anxieties of the late 1990s. It’s a one-two punch of psychological cinema that still packs a wallop.FAQ About The Sixth Sense Podcast EpisodeWho is Jay Sherer?Jay Sherer is the host of The Story Geeks Podcast, a show that dives deep into the themes and structure of genre storytelling.Why is The Sixth Sense still relevant today?Its emotional core, brilliant performances, and unforgettable twist make it a timeless classic that continues to inspire filmmakers.Final Thoughts: We See Greatness in The Sixth SenseWhether you're revisiting The Sixth Sense for the first time in years or analyzing its ghostly layers for the hundredth time, this episode of Movie of the Year delivers sharp analysis, lively discussion, and plenty of...
Movie of the Year: 1999All About My Mother vs. The MummyWhen Pedro Met PopcornIn this special bonus podcast episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds take a detour from draft formats and single-film deep dives to bring you a dynamic double feature: Pedro Almodóvar’s All About My Mother (1999) and Stephen Sommers’ The Mummy (1999). One is an emotionally complex, internationally acclaimed art film. The other is a crowd-pleasing adventure spectacle. And yet—they share more than you might think.This podcast review examines how both films, in vastly different genres and tones, serve as love letters to the movies that came before them. Whether referencing classic melodrama or 1930s monster movies, All About My Mother and The Mummy demonstrate that the films of 1999 have a cinematic legacy as enduring as their memory.All About My Mother (1999) Movie Review: The Emotional EpicPedro Almodóvar’s All About My Mother is an intricate, compassionate examination of motherhood, identity, and grief. The film is suffused with references to cinema—from All About Eve to A Streetcar Named Desire. The Taste Buds analyze how Almodóvar uses visual language and character archetypes to update and honor classic Hollywood and European melodramas, while giving voice to marginalized characters rarely centered on screen.The Mummy (1999) Movie Discussion: A Popcorn Adventure with Classic RootsIn contrast, The Mummy updates the 1930s Universal monster movies for a late-’90s audience. With Brendan Fraser as a swashbuckling hero and Rachel Weisz as a brainy librarian-turned-explorer, the film balances horror, comedy, and romance in a pulpy, action-packed romp. The Taste Buds explore how The Mummy evokes the spirit of early adventure films while reinventing its archetypes for a modern audience.Cinema About Cinema: Film History as FoundationDespite their differences, All About My Mother and The Mummy are united by their referentiality. Both films use a rich knowledge of film history—not as a crutch, but as a launching point. Almodóvar weaves old film tropes into new emotional truths. Sommers crafts a blockbuster that lovingly revives and retools a genre. The Taste Buds discuss how both directors use nostalgia not as imitation, but as inspiration.The Taste Buds Dig In: Movie Podcast Panel ReactionsThe panelists share their favorite moments from both films, comparing the emotional stakes, visual aesthetics, and thematic resonance. How does The Mummy’s big-budget spectacle stack up against the intimate drama of All About My Mother? Which film aged better? And what do they reveal about what cinema meant in 1999?Different Genres, Same Passion for CinemaAll About My Mother and The Mummy may live in different cinematic universes, but both show how the movies of 1999 mined the rich soil of film history to grow something bold and fresh. Whether it’s Pedro Almodóvar’s poignant melodrama or Stephen Sommers’ thrilling adventure, both films prove that storytelling evolves through homage and reinvention.🎧 Listen now to this bonus episode of Movie of the Year—your go-to movie podcast for deep dives into the greatest films of 1999—and celebrate the dual brilliance of All About My Mother and The Mummy.📲 Subscribe to Movie of the Year for more deep dives into 1999’s most memorable films, including bonus episodes like this one covering All About My Mother and The Mummy.
Movie of the Year: 1999Run Lola Run (feat. Keith Phipps!)Why Run Lola Run Still Speeds AheadIn this high-octane episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds tackle Tom Tykwer’s groundbreaking film Run Lola Run, one of the most iconic international films of 1999. Through frenetic pacing, looping timelines, and multimedia storytelling, Run Lola Run challenged narrative norms and redefined cinematic structure for a generation.Joined by guest film critic Keith Phipps, co-host of Your Next Picture Show, the panel examines what makes Run Lola Run a modern classic. They also revisit horror history in a bonus segment about The Blair Witch Project.Lola: Run Lola Run’s Unstoppable HeroineFranka Potente’s Lola is a force of nature. With her fire-red hair and relentless sprint through Berlin, she embodies urgency, love, and power. The Taste Buds explore Lola’s role as more than just a protagonist—she’s a symbol of agency, chance, and emotional propulsion. Why does Lola resonate so deeply with audiences 25 years later?Time, Destiny, and Choice in Run Lola RunAt the core of Run Lola Run is a meditation on fate, free will, and chaos theory. Through its triptych structure—three timelines with radically different outcomes—Run Lola Run asks: what if one second could change everything? The Taste Buds dissect how the film explores the butterfly effect, choice vs. destiny, and the role of memory in shaping the future.Multimedia Mayhem: The Visual Language of Run Lola RunThis movie was ahead of its time in visual storytelling. Tykwer fuses live-action footage, flash animation, time-lapse photography, and techno music into a pulse-pounding montage. The panel breaks down how the film’s use of multimedia created a hyper-stylized, immersive experience that continues to influence filmmakers today.Guest Panelist: Keith Phipps from Your Next Picture ShowFilm critic and podcast host Keith Phipps joins the Taste Buds to bring his expertise on European cinema, genre-bending narratives, and 1999’s cinematic landscape. As a founding editor of The A.V. Club and co-host of Your Next Picture Show, Keith provides sharp context and deep analysis that elevate the episode’s exploration of Run Lola Run.Bonus Segment: The Blair Witch Project and Found Footage InnovationIn a special bonus segment, the Taste Buds revisit another 1999 cultural landmark: The Blair Witch Project. They discuss the film’s revolutionary use of found footage, viral marketing, and psychological horror. How did this minimalist thriller terrify a generation and launch a new genre? The Taste Buds dig into the mythology, legacy, and impact of this indie phenomenon.Related Episodes You’ll LoveSouth Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut – 1999 Movie PodcastThe Green Mile - 1999 Movie of the YearThe Iron Giant – 1999 Movie PodcastFinal Thoughts: Run Lola Run as a Cultural SprintThis movie isn’t just a 1999 film—it’s a cultural event that captured the anxiety, optimism, and possibility of a new millennium. Through Lola’s sheer willpower and the film’s bold narrative experiments, it challenges us to rethink how stories are told—and how our choices shape the...
Movie of the Year: 1999South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut (feat. Nate Ragolia!)Why South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut Still MattersIn this hilariously unfiltered episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds revisit the notorious 1999 film South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut. Blending satirical genius with musical chaos, the movie left a cultural impact, and the Taste Buds are here to explore how it still resonates 25 years later.With its fearless takedown of American censorship, over-the-top commentary on masculinity, and rare-for-its-time portrayal of homosexuality, South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut is more than just fart jokes and foul language. It’s a surprisingly poignant time capsule of late-‘90s anxiety, and the Taste Buds break it all down.Censorship in South Park: Bigger, Longer, and UncutNo movie waged war with the MPAA quite like this one. The Taste Buds analyze how South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut skewers moral panic, parental outrage, and the hypocrisy of the film rating system. From the “R” rating controversy to the meta-commentary built into the plot, this section reveals why censorship is the film’s true villain.Masculinity and War: Boys Being BoysSouth Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut builds its central conflict around immature boys triggering a global catastrophe. The Taste Buds examine how the film employs absurd humor to expose the fragility of masculinity and the toxic expectations society places on young men. Expect debate on whether Cartman is the id of American manhood—or just a chaotic neutral goblin.Homosexuality and Big Gay Al: A Queer SubtextIn a surprising turn for a 1999 mainstream animated movie, South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut includes a sympathetic queer character in Big Gay Al. The Taste Buds discuss the film’s portrayal of homosexuality, including its satirical (yet sincere) celebration of queer identity. From Saddam and Satan’s toxic romance to the hopeful notes of Big Gay Al’s song, the film blends camp and commentary in unexpected ways.Guest Panelist: Nate Ragolia from Debut BuddiesSpecial guest Nate Ragolia, co-host of the movie podcast Debut Buddies, joins this episode with insightful takes and a deep appreciation for chaos. Nate helps the Taste Buds unpack why South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut still resonates today, from its musical theater references to its unflinching (and hilarious) view of American culture.Related Episodes You’ll Love:The Iron Giant – 1999 Movie PodcastThe Green Mile – 1999 Movie PodcastThe Action Figures Draft – Movie of the YearFinal Thoughts: Revisiting South Park: Bigger, Longer, and UncutSouth Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut is more than a relic of juvenile rebellion—it’s a cultural commentary wrapped in fart jokes and musical numbers. Whether you’re a longtime fan or revisiting it for the first time, the Taste Buds’ discussion offers new reasons to appreciate the film’s satire, boldness, and weird emotional resonance.Stream the episode now and rediscover why South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut still punches up, punches through, and—occasionally—sings its way into our hearts.
Movie of the Year: 1999The Action Figure Draft, Part IIDrafting the Ultimate 1999 Action FiguresIn this action-packed and comedic finale of the Movie of the Year podcast, the Taste Buds complete their dream teams of 1999 movie characters in The Action Figures Draft. Inspired by Dungeons & Dragons character classes like Bard, Cleric, Druid, Fighter, and Wizard, each panelist must create the most powerful and ridiculous team of would-be action figures.From cult favorites to blockbuster icons, no character is off-limits in this chaotic snake draft showdown. Whether you're here for the laughs or the nostalgia, this episode blends pop culture nerdery with competitive spirit.What Is the Action Figures Draft?The Action Figures Draft is where the Taste Buds channel their inner dungeon masters to pick a five-member team of fictional characters from 1999 films. The twist? Each character must fill a D&D role: Bard, Cleric, Druid, Fighter, and Wizard.Each panelist—including guest Taste Bud Taylor—must strategize their picks while balancing power, flair, and absurdity. Do you build the strongest team? Or the weirdest shelf of plastic heroes?1999 Movies Meet Dungeons & DragonsThis isn't just about cool characters. It's about team synergy and hilarious storytelling. The Taste Buds debate who makes a better Fighter: Neo or The Mummy’s Rick O’Connell? Should you pick The Blair Witch for Druid just for the chaos? What accessories would The Iron Giant’s action figure come with?The draft style is classic snake format, so the stakes rise with each passing round. The Taste Buds argue, laugh, and justify their boldest choices.Meet the Draft Teams: Bard, Cleric, Druid & MoreBard – Most charismatic or musical pickCleric – The team’s support and healing presenceDruid – Nature-powered, mystical, or shape-shifting charactersFighter – The brute strength, heavy-hitter typeWizard – Powers, tech, or unexplained magicSpecial Guest Taste Bud: TaylorReturning guest Taylor adds their signature unpredictable energy to the panel. Known for deep pulls and unfiltered commentary, Taylor’s presence ensures that this draft spirals into the delightfully absurd.Related Episodes You’ll Love:The Green MileThe Iron GiantElectionFinal Thoughts: The Best Action Figures That Never WereThe Action Figures Draft proves that 1999 movie characters are still larger than life—and perfect for plastic. Whether you're a longtime fan of Movie of the Year or just want to imagine Jar Jar Binks as your team’s Bard, this is an episode you won’t want to miss.Listen now to the Action Figures Draft and decide which team of imaginary toys reigns supreme!