Discover
New Discourses
391 Episodes
Reverse
New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 145
Carl Schmitt captured the essence of totalitarian politics in his book The Concept of the Political (1932) (https://amzn.to/4sf2Rpk). It is the distinction between friend and enemy. The poison of this kind of thinking is in the ugly fact that the declared enemy must be treated as the declared enemy once a political faction has declared one, and anyone who doesn't go along with that declaration declares himself one of the enemy. That is, it's not just the us-versus-them nature of the declaration of friend and enemy that poisons politics and societies; it's the logic of the friend-enemy political program entirely. Host James Lindsay explains this dangerous logic in this new episode of New Discourses Bullets. Join him to understand.
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #friendenemy
The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Ep. 194
James Lindsay's second trip to Israel was very different from his first (https://newdiscourses.com/2025/11/am-yisrael-chai/). On this trip, he got what he calls his "Real Jerusalem Experience," and he did a wide variety of things, not so much a coherent, organized tour. In the process, he was introduced to Israeli and Jewish life in a new way, which has offered him insights on what it means to be American and why America is the way that it is. Perhaps most poignantly, while visiting Kibbutz Nir Oz with Seth Dillon, Rob McCoy, Karys Rhea, and others, he heard directly how the heartbeat of life, strength, and endurance in the face of tremendous evil and adversity can be summarized in two simple words: "Jewish values." Join James on this new episode of the New Discourses Podcast and travel with him through Israel for a second time.
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #jewish
New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 144
The ever-insightful Michael Malice once explained, "most people do not process information through a true/false filter but through an us/them filter." There are pretty deep and interesting reasons why this is true, and there are also insightful comments to be made about the necessity and value of at least some of us disciplining ourselves to prefer a true/false filter, or at least to defer to the results of one. In this episode of New Discourses Bullets, host James Lindsay explores this idea out loud and explains its relevance to politics, society, and education. Be sure to join him!
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #UsVsThem
The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Ep. 193
As we encounter both the material in the infamous Epstein Files and revelations from some of Epstein's associates, not to mention the advances in AI and robotics, we're confronted with what seemed like dystopian science fiction just a few years ago: transhumanism. Tech futurists, however, have been predicting it and working toward it for decades, including the curious figure of "Martine" Rothblatt, creator of SiriusXM Radio and board member at the Mayo Clinic. Rothblatt is trans and has written at least two very odd books about sex and gender, The Apartheid of Sex: A Manifesto on the Freedom of Gender (https://www.amazon.com/Apartheid-Sex-Manifesto-Freedom-Gender/dp/051759997X/) (1996) and an updated version called From Transgender to Transhuman: A Manifesto on the Freedom of Form (https://www.amazon.com/Transgender-Transhuman-Manifesto-Freedom-Form/dp/0615489427/) (2011). In this latter book, Rothblatt explains, perhaps ironically now, that the same arguments that justify "transgender" also justify transhuman: ultimately that who we really are does not depend on our physical body at all. In this creepy episode of the New Discourses Podcast, host James Lindsay presents some of this troubling book to you. You will not want to miss this.
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #Transhumanism
New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 143
As normal people who value ideological and logical consistency, we tend to find movements like the Red-Green Alliance (Communists and Islamists) and "Queers for Palestine" confusing. How can people with such different views and goals work together? Obviously, part of the answer is the simple one: they have a common enemy to defeat and can work out their differences after they solve that problem. Nevertheless, the answer to this question, at least from the Communist side, is written explicitly as a command on the last page of the Communist Manifesto. Communists will always take the side of any movement against the existing order of things, simple as that. Host James Lindsay explains this to you in this important episode of New Discourses Bullets. You don't want to miss it.
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #Communist
The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Ep. 192
What makes something valuable? How do we determine value? One hypothesis on value is famously forwarded and relied upon by the Marxists. It is called the "Labor Theory of Value," and it insists that labor is what transforms raw materials into something "humanized" and therefore of value. Therefore, in this theory, labor is what makes something valuable. Of course, this theory has not proved to be adequate for economic purposes, which is just another part of why Marxism is an abject failure even as an economic doctrine (aside from everything else). The question, however, remains. In this fun episode of the New Discourses Podcast, host James Lindsay takes a casual stab at a different answer: a problem-solving theory of value. This would be the idea that value is determined in relation to a good, commodity, or service's capacity to solve problems for people, particularly their consumers. Join him on this exploration to think about some things in a new, different way.
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #theory
New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 142
What in the world do the Woke mean by "lived experience"? (https://newdiscourses.com/tftw-lived-experience/) As has been discussed here before (https://newdiscourses.com/2022/10/lived-experience-explained/), lived experience is a kind of magical combination of what someone actually lives and experiences and a Woke (or "Critical" or Marxist) interpretation of what causes that experience and what it means. That is, it is experience plus Woke interpretation. The thing is, while only the Woke Left calls this mixture of experience and activating misinterpretation by the term "lived experience," the phenomenon is spreading outside of Leftist circles. It's important we see how. In this episode of New Discourses Bullets, host James Lindsay revisits the topic of "lived experience" and explains how it manifests outside of Leftist enclaves and without the cutesy name. You don't want to miss this one. It's an important one.
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #livedexperience
The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Ep. 191
Central to the idea of Marxist thought, although Marx himself rarely used the term, is the idea of "false consciousness." People, it is alleged, are going through their lives unaware of the realities of the world around them, existing in an ideologically constructed false consciousness that maintains the existing power structures of the world. (Being "Woke" in fact, is adopting an awakened "true" consciousness of the nature of self-replicating and self-sustaining systemic power and the need to overthrow it.) In the Islamism of the Muslim Brotherhood, as articulated by its intellectual centerpiece, Sayyid Qutb in his 1964 book Milestones (https://amzn.to/4sSnI33 ), there's a similar dichotomy called "Jahiliyyah" (Ignorance) and Islam (submission to God under Shari'a). Of course, this is no surprise because Qutb was a Leninist before he was an Islamist. In this episode of the New Discourses Podcast, host James Lindsay goes back into the text of Milestones to discuss this important concept and its profound parallels to Marxist Communism. Join him to understand.
Milestones, Vol. 1: Islamist Bolshevism: https://youtu.be/uOR5qG07fmA
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #islamism
New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 141
"Woke" often proceeds by what amounts to social magic spells, and some of the most potent kinds of these spells are certain framings of inevitability or universality. The general gist of the construction would be "everything is already like this, so we should do it consciously (and according to Woke framing)." An alternative is "everything will eventually work this way, no matter how it started, so we should lean into it consciously (and according to Woke framing)." Surely, you've encountered this. In this episode of New Discourses Bullets, host James Lindsay dives into this construction and how it sets up other Woke "magic spells" (like affordance traps: https://newdiscourses.com/2024/03/staying-out-of-affordance-traps/ ) to get you to do their bidding. You won't want to miss this important expose of Woke manipulation.
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #woke
The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Ep. 190
What gets called Woke, especially on the Left, is a complete worldview (or ersatz theology) that therefore provides all the usual philosophical elements. It isn't just a way of knowing or of acting in the world; it is also a comprehensive theory of being in the world. Because Woke (especially on the Left) is critically constructivist in its underlying architecture, the self it believes in is a constructed self, or even a self-constructed self. To highlight and explain this, in this episode of the New Discourses Podcast, host James Lindsay takes us back into Joe Kincheloe's Critical Constructivism: A Primer (https://amzn.to/4qUzlVx ), which he calls "The Book of Woke" to discuss the idea of self-production in a Woke ontology. Join him to get yet another deep look at Woke as it was actually formulated by the people who believe it.
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #woke
New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 140
It goes without saying at this point that "Woke" activists appear to exhibit a suite of psychopathological traits and behaviors, but why? They can't all be crazy, not in the literal sense. The answer might lie in a concept that is sometimes called behavioral psychopathology, although the behaviors in this case are actually ideologically conditioned, motivated, and driven. That is, the answer might be that they aren't literally crazy but their ideological belief structure makes them behave, think, and even react in psychopathological ways. In this episode of New Discourses Bullets, host James Lindsay raises this possibility and offers a short discussion on it in the hopes of adding clarity and depth to a conversation that is becoming absolutely undeniable.
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #Psychology
The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Ep. 189
An undeniable part of the Nazi Experiment is that it operated a fascist-style dictatorship for its infamous "racialist worldview." It got this dictatorship not just through the election of the Nazi Party and Adolf Hitler but through some rapid changes to the law that were made in the first sixty days of Hitler's role in Germany's Chancellorship. Basic liberties were suspended, the Constitution was overridden, and all governing authority was placed ultimately in the hands of the German government and its new Chancellor. All of this had to be done to respond to certain existential emergencies, or so it appeared, following a fire in the Reichstag, the German Parliament, set by arson, allegedly by a Communist as a first stroke in a broader Communist uprising. Within less than two months, Hitler had effectively full control of Germany. In this episode of the New Discourses Podcast, host James Lindsay presents the eleventh volume in his Nazi Experiment podcast series, outlining how this sudden emergency changed the entire course of the history of the world in a span of under four weeks. Join him for what he calls the "schizophrenic discomfort" of the terrifying parallels this period offers for us today.
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #dictatorship
New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 139
As many people are now aware, children are being separated from their parents, both by the state and beyond the state's reach, as a result of indoctrination in gender ideology. In many "gender sanctuary" states, child protective services can even step in and "protect" children from their own parents and good parenting on these grounds, and the circumstances of these separations (sometimes de facto terminations of parental custody without due process) are sometimes developed and encouraged by third parties in schools, counseling offices, clinics, and online spaces. This situation has enough of a feel of "trafficking" of children to it that the word is naturally attaching to these situations even though it is legally incorrect. So, what is going on with "gender trafficking," and can it be developed into a genuine legal definition that gives parents legal options and paths to action? In this episode of New Discourses Bullets, host James Lindsay explains and explores these ideas in a new way. If the issue of gender ideology and protecting children from it are important to you, this is a must-listen.
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #gender
The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Ep. 188
What is "Woke"?
Even though it's a term that has come to us through slang and without a stable meaning as it evolved, the term "Woke" is increasingly coming to mean something quite specific and precise. For several years now, we have associated it with the radical Leftism of our day, sometimes being so precise as to say that it means having adopted (or "woke up to") a critical constructivist worldview. What does that mean, though? At bottom, Woke is a worldview rooted in entitlement and alienation that gets located for the individual in class conflict. By absorbing his own sense of alienation and "superseding" himself for a group identity, a man becomes "Woke." Along with that comes a preference for subjugated or marginalized knowledges and ways of knowing, as the lingo goes. In this episode of the New Discourses Podcast, host James Lindsay breaks down "Woke" and all that it means in this deeper way. Join him to gain the insight needed to understand this important term correctly.
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #Woke
Saving American Liberty, Session 9
What is an American? Or, rather, what makes Americans American? This is a question we have been able to take for granted for a long time, but due to unwanted pressure from the "Woke Right," we're now facing a deliberate attempt to redefine American identity. At New Discourses, we believe in taking these kinds of challenges head on, so at the Saving American Liberty learning seminar we hosted in Dallas, Texas, on August 22-23, 2025, New Discourses founder, James Lindsay, made it his fifth, final, and anchor lecture of the event. It's an informative but more importantly inspiring talk that hearkens to the intrinsic and sacred covenant with Liberty that defines American identity. Join him for a better answer to the question "What is an American?" than you'll hear almost anywhere else, and may your faith in our great nation and its Blessings of Liberty be renewed by it.
The other lectures in this series can be found here:
Session 1: https://youtu.be/4u2ak-DmKD4
Session 2: https://youtu.be/gUiLUmZWsc4
Session 3: https://youtu.be/WRheQNDTSOQ
Session 4: https://youtu.be/AjKqBgzF36w
Session 5: https://youtu.be/wHMPBILnAw0
Session 6: https://youtu.be/nchy8NdHigs
Session 7: https://youtu.be/LnX--YIF_co
Session 8: https://youtu.be/Y9VB1tigffk
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #America
The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Ep. 187
What is Islamism? Is it the same thing as Islam? Has it varied over time? What's its relationship to Communism, at least in our present era? These are important questions, particularly in light of the undeniable force of the Red-Green Alliance currently besetting the West. Against the backdrop of American leaders naming the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization, at least in limited fashion, it's a worthwhile endeavor to explore its intellectual underpinnings, which were recorded by Sayyid Qutb in a book called Milestones (https://amzn.to/48QcfHR) in 1964, two years before he was hanged in Egypt for his radicalism. In this episode of the New Discourses Podcast, host James Lindsay goes through the introduction of this book and explains its deep similarities to the Leninist Communism Qutb was immersed in before radicalizing, particularly Lenin's 1902 tract What Is to Be Done? Join him for insight into this important work that shapes one of the biggest movements against the West in the world today.
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #Islam
New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 138
As it turns out, a small number of bad actors who have an informational advantage over a much larger but naive population in turn have a gigantic strategic advantage over that same population. In order to demonstrate this fact and make it popular, a Russian student some decades ago devised a popular party game called "Mafia" that, after spreading to Western nations, got rebranded "Werewolves." This game can teach us a lot about how a small band of actors who are deliberately coordinating with one another can extract an enormous strategic advantage over a population who doesn't realize who the bad actors are or that they're coordinating. Join host James Lindsay for this fascinating episode of New Discourses Bullets where he explains the relevance of this game and its lessons to our everyday experience of political warfare environments.
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #Werewolves
Saving American Liberty, Session 8
In this session, Michael O’Fallon argues that contemporary post-liberal and integralist movements, while often presented as moral correctives to modern liberalism, pose significant challenges to pluralism, constitutional governance, and individual liberty. O’Fallon examines how concepts such as distributism and subsidiarity can shift authority away from individuals toward centralized structures claiming to serve the “common good,” and how modern forms of integralism blur the distinction between spiritual and temporal power, raising concerns about dissent and conscience in diverse societies. O’Fallon situates these developments within broader dynamics of social destabilization and reform, noting how periods of cultural conflict and institutional distrust create openings for sweeping structural change. He further explores the evolving role of religious institutions, cautioning that partnerships with political and economic elites risk instrumentalizing faith in support of technocratic agendas. O’Fallon concludes that the convergence of political theory, religion, and technology signals a transition toward more integrated forms of authority that require careful, historically informed scrutiny to ensure they remain compatible with freedom, accountability, and human dignity.
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #michaelofallon #Integralism
The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Ep. 186
The dialectic is ultimately the engine of all Marxist and Hegelian thought and also underlies Fascism and the conflict between Fascism and Marxism. It is also fundamentally Sociological Alchemy, as the Soviets both knew and admitted. Based on Marx's ideas about dialectical materialism as the fundamental law of all of Nature, including Man, the Soviets outlined three key dialectical laws and taught them to every school child and party member. First, there is the transformation of quantity into quality, and vice-versa. Second, there is the struggle and unification of opposites. Third, there is the "negation of the negation," which most people know as "problem, reaction, solution" in practice. In this episode of the New Discourses Podcast, host James Lindsay introduces these three dialectical laws of Marxist and Soviet thought and brings them alive for you while comparing them to the social alchemy of George Soros and the ancient wizardry that tried to turn lead into gold.
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2025 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #alchemy
Saving American Liberty, Session 7
During the 20th century, or the Modern Era, material conditions were king, but as the Information Era of the 21st century (construed broadly) emerged, they have become less important to our politics. At the New Discourses-hosted Saving American Liberty conference held in Dallas, Texas, on August 22-23, 2025, founder of New Discourses, James Lindsay, explains in this important fourth lecture how thinking changed as the Modern Era gave way to an Information Era many consider to be "Postmodern." Continuing from his previous lecture in the series, Lindsay explains that "Woke" sociognostic thinking evolved along with this change, which can be characterized by a transition from thinking man is produced by his material conditions to believing he is produced by his social (structural) conditions, which "Woke" radicals need to seize in order to remake man in their own images. Join him for a proper introduction to the "Woke Right" as a Reaction movement against the postmodern neo-Marxism of the Woke Left.
The other lectures in this series can be found here:
Session 1: https://youtu.be/4u2ak-DmKD4
Session 2: https://youtu.be/gUiLUmZWsc4
Session 3: https://youtu.be/WRheQNDTSOQ
Session 4: https://youtu.be/AjKqBgzF36w
Session 5: https://youtu.be/wHMPBILnAw0
Session 6: https://youtu.be/nchy8NdHigs
Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/
Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support
Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe
Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames
© 2025 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #woke
























brilliant podcast James. I'm in israel now and found your monologue very poignant and helpful. anybody interested in middle east and especially Israel, I recommend listening.
it's just the devils lie in the garden again. Ignore the law, it won't give you life and happiness. ignore the law because the law is what is keeping you from the truth. ignore the law and you will live forever.
James Lindsay lies: Hitler didn't call his followers "Nazis" nor "Fascists" (Hitler called them SOCIALISTS) & Hitler didn't call his symbol a "swastika". JL is so ignorant he is unaware that Hitler's flag symbol meant "S for SOCIALIST" (a top discovery by Professor Rex Curry). Hitler's flag is an IQ test. JL flunked. For proof just “describe the letters (and words) shown in the German symbols used for the groups NSV, SA, SS & VW" (JL flunks the description test and thereby shows he knows Dr. Curry is correct). Review JL's past podcasts & see that he has NEVER said, "Hitler did not call his followers 'Nazis' nor 'Fascists'." Stop misgendering Hitler, Lindsay. Respect Hitler's preferred pronoun (SOCIALIST). Hitler's German socialism was influenced by Soviet socialism, which already had Yevsektsiya and banned Judaism. Soviet socialists joined German socialists to start WW2 into Poland & onward. Hitler & Stalin were both influenced by Marx's antisemitic "On The Jewish Question." The Milita
James Lindsay is so ignorant he is unaware that Hitler did not call his followers 'Nazis' nor 'Fascists'. JL is unaware that Hitler's flag symbol represented "S means SOCIALISM"& Hitler's socialist salute came from the USA socialist Francis Bellamy (2 top discoveries by Historian Dr. Rex Curry). You can review JL's past videos and podcasts and see that he NEVER said, "Hitler did not call his followers 'Nazis' nor 'Fascists'.
Charlie Kirk’s assassination exposed how Americans are so stupid they are unaware that Hitler did not call his followers "Nazis" nor "Fascists" (he called them "SOCIALISTS"). Hitler's flag meant "S for SOCIALIST" (a top discovery by Historian Dr. Rex Curry). Republicans repeat the linguistic lies of socialists. You won't hear any Republicans say, "Hitler self-identified the same as Kirk’s assassin and the scum who applauded Kirk's killer: SOCIALIST" nor “Hitler did not call his comrades Nazis".
Charlie Kirk’s assassination exposed how Americans are so stupid they are unaware that Hitler did not call his followers "Nazis" nor "Fascists" (he called them "SOCIALISTS"). Hitler's flag meant "S for SOCIALIST" (a top discovery by Historian Dr. Rex Curry). Republicans repeat the linguistic lies of socialists. You won't hear any Republicans say "Hitler self-identified the same as Kirk’s assassin and the scum who applauded Kirk's killer: SOCIALIST" nor “Hitler did not call his comrades Nazis nor Fascists”.
James Lindsay is staring at Mein Kampf & is too much of a stupid liar to ever say "Hitler did not call his followers 'Nazis' nor 'Fascists'". JL has a lot of lies he spews. Hitler didn't call his symbol a "swastika". JL is so ignorant he is unaware that Hitler's flag symbol represented "S for SOCIALIST" (a top discovery by historian Dr. Rex Curry). JL was unable to make Dr. Curry's discovery because of JL's dogma & lies that make it impossible for him to understand Hitler's vocabulary & symbols
JL is staring right at Mein Kampf and is to much of a stupid liar to ever say "Hitler did not call his followers 'Nazis' nor 'Fascists'" in Mein Kampf nor anywhere ever. JL has a lot of lies he spews. Hitler didn't call his symbol a "swastika". JL is so ignorant he is unaware that Hitler's flag symbol represented "S for SOCIALIST" (a top discovery by historian Dr. Rex Curry). JL was unable to make Dr. Curry's discovery because of JL's dogma and lies that make it impossible for him to understand Hitler's vocabulary and symbolism.
Big lies in this one from James Lindsay (JL). At 16:00 JL spews his favorite lie: "The Nazi Lie". It is the lie that Hitler called his followers "Nazis" (Hitler didn't). JL compounds the lie with another lie that "Nazi" is "Na" from National and then "zi" from the "zi" in "Sozialistiche" in the party's name as he explains how Hitler or his group came up with the term "Nazi" (they didn't). "Nazi" is no where in Mein Kampf and JL has no example of Hitler ever saying "Nazi". So JL just lies. Other people called them "Nazis" and it came from the sound in German of the first two syllables of the party's name: "National Socialist German Workers Party". The first two syllables of "National" in the German language sound like "Nazi". You can play "National" in German on a translate app for hours and hear the "Nazi" part. Next, JL lies at 18:18 and 18:37 to say that they were "Fascist". Hitler never self-identified as "Fascist" nor "Nazi". JL is staring right at Mein Kampf and is to much of a st
Hitler didn't call his followers "Nazis" nor "Fascists" (Hitler called them SOCIALISTS) & Hitler didn't call his symbol a "swastika". James Lindsay is too ignorant to know. JL is so ignorant he is unaware that Hitler's flag symbol represented "S means SOCIALIST" (a top discovery by historian Dr. Rex Curry). Hitler's flag is an IQ test. JL flunked. For proof just “describe the letters (and words) shown in the German symbols used for the groups NSV, SA, SS, and VW" (JL flunks the description test and thereby shows that he knows that Dr. Curry's work is correct). You can review JL's past videos & podcasts & see that he has NEVER said, "Hitler did not call his followers 'Nazis' nor 'Fascists'." It is comedy to listen to JL read Mein Kampf and he never notices that Hitler didn't call his followers "Nazis" nor "Fascists" (Hitler calls them SOCIALISTS in Mein Kampf and everywhere else too) Hitler's German socialism was influenced by Soviet socialism, which already had Yevsektsiya and had al
James Lindsay is so ignorant he is unaware that Hitler did not call his group "Nazis" nor "Fascists" nor "Nazi Party." He is unaware that Hitler's flag symbol represented "S for SOCIALIST" & Hitler's socialist salute came from the USA socialist Francis Bellamy (2 top discoveries by Historian Dr. Rex Curry). Hitler's racism came from Marx's antisemitic "On The Jewish Question" & the USSR. Soviet socialists joined German socialists to start WW2 into Poland & onward.
James Lindsay lies: Hitler didn't call his followers "Nazis" nor "Fascists" (Hitler called them SOCIALISTS) & Hitler didn't call his symbol a "swastika". JL is so ignorant he is unaware that Hitler's flag symbol meant "S for SOCIALIST" (a top discovery by Professor Rex Curry). Hitler's flag is an IQ test. JL flunked. For proof just “describe the letters (and words) shown in the German symbols used for the groups NSV, SA, SS & VW" (JL flunks the description test and thereby shows he knows Dr. Curry is correct). Review JL's past podcasts & see that he has NEVER said, "Hitler did not call his followers 'Nazis' nor 'Fascists'." Hitler's German socialism was influenced by Soviet socialism, which already had Yevsektsiya and banned Judaism. Soviet socialists joined German socialists to start WW2 into Poland & onward. Hitler & Stalin were both influenced by Marx's antisemitic "On The Jewish Question." The Military Salute became Nazi Salute via Bellamy salutes in the USA.
James Lindsay is so ignorant he is reading Mein Kampf & remains unaware that Hitler did not call his group "Nazis" nor "Fascists" nor "Nazi Party." JL is unaware that Hitler's flag symbol represented "S for SOCIALIST" & Hitler's socialist salute came from the USA socialist Francis Bellamy (2 top discoveries by Historian Dr. Rex Curry). Hitler's racism came from Marx's antisemitic "On The Jewish Question" & the USSR. Soviet socialists joined German socialists to start WW2 into Poland & onward.
Lindsay lies: Hitler did not call his followers "Nazis" nor "Fascists" (Hitler called them SOCIALISTS) & Hitler didn't call his symbol a "swastika". JL is so ignorant he is unaware that Hitler's flag symbol represented "S means SOCIALIST" (a top discovery by swastikologist Dr. Rex Curry). Hitler's flag is an IQ test. JL flunked. For proof just “describe the letters (and words) shown in the German symbols used for the groups NSV, SA, SS, and VW" (JL flunks the description test and thereby shows that he knows that Dr. Rex Curry is correct). You can review JL's past videos & podcasts & see that he has NEVER said, "Hitler did not call his followers 'Nazis' nor 'Fascists'." Hitler's German socialism was influenced by Soviet socialism, which already had Yevsektsiya and banned Judaism. Soviet socialists joined German socialists to start WW2 into Poland & onward. Hitler & Stalin were both influenced by Marx's antisemitic "On The Jewish Question."
James Lindsay lies: Hitler did not all his followers "Nazis" nor "Fascists" (Hitler called them SOCIALISTS) & Hitler didn't call his symbol a "swastika". JL is so ignorant he is unaware that Hitler's flag symbol represented "S means SOCIALIST" (a top discovery by swastikologist Dr. Rex Curry). Hitler's flag is an IQ test. JL flunked. For proof just “describe the letters (and words) shown in the German symbols used for the groups NSV, SA, SS, and VW" (JL always flunks the description test)
James Lindsay lies: Hitler did not call his followers "Nazis" nor "Fascists" (Hitler called them SOCIALISTS) & Hitler didn't call his symbol a "swastika". JL is so ignorant he is unaware that Hitler's flag symbol represented "S means SOCIALIST" (a top discovery by swastikologist Dr. Rex Curry). Hitler's flag is an IQ test. JL flunked. For proof just “describe the letters (and words) shown in the German symbols used for the groups NSV, SA, SS, and VW" (JL always flunks the description test).
James Lindsay lies: Hitler did not all his followers "Nazis" nor "Fascists" (Hitler called them SOCIALISTS) & Hitler didn't call his symbol a "swastika". JL is so ignorant he is unaware that Hitler's flag symbol represented "S means SOCIALIST" (a top discovery by swastikologist Dr. Rex Curry). Hitler's flag is an IQ test. JL flunked. For proof just “describe the letters (and words) shown in the German symbols used for the groups NSV, SA, SS, and VW" (JL flunks the description test and thereby shows that he knows that Dr. Rex Curry is correct). You can review JL's past videos & podcasts & see that he has NEVER said, "Hitler did not call his followers 'Nazis' nor 'Fascists'." Hitler's German socialism was influenced by Soviet socialism, which already had Yevsektsiya and banned Judaism. Soviet socialists joined German socialists to start WW2 into Poland & onward. Hitler & Stalin were both influenced by Marx's antisemitic "On The Jewish Question." The Military Salute became Nazi Salute via
also relevant listening 🎧
relevant listening 🎧
James Lindsay (of New Discourses) is so ignorant he is unaware that Hitler did not call his flag symbol a "swastika." JL doesn't know what Hitler called Hitler's symbol. JL is so ignorant he is unaware that Hitler's flag symbol represented "S means SOCIALISM" (a top discovery by Historian Dr. Rex Curry). Hitler's flag is an IQ test. JL flunked. Soviet socialists joined German socialists to start WW2 into Poland & onward. You can review JL's past videos & podcasts & see that he has NEVER said, "Hitler did not call his followers 'Nazis' nor 'Fascists'."