Discover
Patterson in Pursuit
Patterson in Pursuit
Author: Steve Patterson
Subscribed: 1,978Played: 23,321Subscribe
Share
© Steve Patterson
Description
Philosophy in the real world. Interviewing intellectuals across the globe. Grappling with the biggest ideas.
stevepatterson.substack.com
stevepatterson.substack.com
203 Episodes
Reverse
Original article here, from 2023: Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
Even more recently, I’ve become drawn to Catholic Christianity, but these articles capture my thoughts from a few years ago. Part 1:Part 2: Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
Original article here: Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
Original article here: Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
Original article here: Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
Patri Friedman shares his experiences and research about sleep apnea, after struggling with it for decades. Patri’s website: https://patrifriedman.com/ Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
Original article here: And yes, this narration was generated by an AI clone of my voice. Incredible. Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
Eric Brakey joins me to talk about his recent experience getting detained at the border after returning from a cruise. His papers and electronics were searched, and the border guards told him that his Constitutional rights didn’t apply. A story we should pay attention to. Free State Project: fsp.org Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
The desire to understand mechanism has led scientists, doctors, and researchers into grave error—the “mechanism fallacy”—thinking that correlations are not causally connected if the mechanism is not understood. Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
Article and mentioned links here: Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
We've become desensitized to the novelty of the Trinity. I am joined by Dr. Jared Ortiz to discuss the history and importance of the Council of Nicaea. Guest's website: https://hope.edu/directory/people/ortiz-jared/index.html Guest's book: The Nicene Creed: A Scriptural, Historical, and Theological Commentary Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
Original article here: Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
Original article here: Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
There are too many anomalies in archaeology to ignore. Our paradigms will have to be revised.My conversation with Michael Button, a rising star from the next generation of scholars. Check out his YouTube channel here. Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
Original article here: Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
(From December 2022) Written article here: Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
Article here: Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
Textbook calculus is wrong because it's fundamentally continuous. We can do better, and a discrete calculus might even change how we build computers. Interview with Ryan X Charles. Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
Article here: Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe
Article here: Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe



![Theoretical Pluralism and Chess [Narration] Theoretical Pluralism and Chess [Narration]](https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/1219659/post/179979357/cfb17069891c492dfa51f4af86fca5bb.jpg)
![Things I Like about Christianity [Narration] Things I Like about Christianity [Narration]](https://s3.castbox.fm/1a/a5/b6/624b255ca339e5da3dba09ca947c063733_scaled_v1_400.jpg)
![Markets Fail to Solve the Complexity Problem [Narration] Markets Fail to Solve the Complexity Problem [Narration]](https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/1219659/post/179013122/cfb17069891c492dfa51f4af86fca5bb.jpg)



![Three Confirmed Paradoxes in Mathematics [Narration] Three Confirmed Paradoxes in Mathematics [Narration]](https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/1219659/post/174131717/cfb17069891c492dfa51f4af86fca5bb.jpg)

![Intelligence and Pattern Recognition [Narration] Intelligence and Pattern Recognition [Narration]](https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/1219659/post/171142901/cfb17069891c492dfa51f4af86fca5bb.jpg)
![Everything in Discrete Space [Narration] Everything in Discrete Space [Narration]](https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/1219659/post/169967229/cfb17069891c492dfa51f4af86fca5bb.jpg)

![Geometry as Logic [Narration] Geometry as Logic [Narration]](https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/1219659/post/169965173/cfb17069891c492dfa51f4af86fca5bb.jpg)
![Mechanics before Ethics [Narration] Mechanics before Ethics [Narration]](https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/1219659/post/169963586/cfb17069891c492dfa51f4af86fca5bb.jpg)


interesting topic on free will
this was a hard one to follow between the two speakers
I have really enjoyed this one episode. You have wonderfully managed to articulate in a very understandable manner, different aspects of reality perception and theological/religious/intellectual expression of its manifestations. I have, on different occasions, entertained myself with some thoughts and musings that resemble very closely your personal thoughts in this regard, which obviously fascinates me because I can see that not matter how far away in distance and time, some ideas/thoughts are very similar, if not the same. BTW, I have somehow attempted to articulate my personal, similar thoughts about this topic in a book that I am about to publish, hopefully soon. This is, indeed, a very deep and fascinating subject, worthy of consideration by many gatekeepers of religious, theological and scientific tradition. Unfortunately, and under the current, prevalent paradigms and ethos of our world, this reasoning of what God is and is not -or could be- is rejected and not even considered
Well, I do firmly believe there must be an objective truth and reality lying outside of our best attempts to grasp it. However, I also believe that we are able to look at this objective truth from a very specific angle or perspective... that we only have little glimpses, at best, of this objective truth, which makes it unavoidable to express this perception of truth in different manners. I also believe that subjective perceptions of truth and reality may give room to contradictions and inconsistencies in one's own belief system. As a result of the latter, there will be different ways of stating this perception of truth, which, in the surface, may seen to change or evolve from time to time. Does that makes me a fashionable thinker, according to your definition of such?