Personality Junkie Podcast

Join us as we explore a host of fascinating topics—personality, growth, relationships, culture, religion, etc.—through the lens of personality typology. We draw heavily on the work of Carl Jung and the Myers-Briggs / MBTI, but also incorporate insights from the Enneagram, Big Five, and related taxonomies.

Why INFJ, INTJ, INFP & INTP Types Struggle with Inaction

The Intuitive Introvert personality types–INFP, INFJ, INTP and INTJ types (collectively, "INs" or "IN types" )–are famous for their introspective proclivities. In contrast to Extraverted and Sensing types, they're prone to extensive reflection prior to action. While prolonged reflection may enhance their self-awareness and imaginative capacities, IN types frequently struggle to materialize (S) their ideas or insights (N) in the real world. Notions like "analysis paralysis" or "unrealized potential" are often assigned to such types. In this podcast, we explore that struggle with practical examples and insights from type theory, as well as potential solutions. We hope you enjoy it! Related reading: Why INFPs, INTPs, INFJs, & INTJs Struggle to Act Beyond Rare: The INFJ's Guide to Cultivating Growth & Self-Awareness  

07-30
07:02

Episode 5: The 3 Ways of Determining Your Personality Type

In this podcast we discuss the three commonly employed methods for honing in on your specific personality type. We explore the strengths and weaknesses of each method and how to avoid the common pitfalls with each method.

05-06
04:14

Episode 4: Thinkers in Relationships

This podcast explores the challenges, both practical and psychological, thinking types (e.g., INTP) face in relationships. These challenges largely stem from the inferior nature of thinkers' feeling (F) function, which can make their feelings more difficult to access, understand, and express. There are exceptions, however, such as periods of infatuation in which feelings are fueled by idealism. While experiencing strong emotions provide the promise of a more rich and rewarding life for thinking types, such experiences can be difficult to sustain once their thinking (T) process regains it typical control. Thinkers are thus faced with the challenge of finding a more sustainable way of integrating feeling into their daily lives and relationships. They must also come to grips with how they will think about and engage with their partners once feelings of infatuation have waned. What will motivate them to persist and grow with their partners?

03-31
58:17

Episode 3: Judger (J) or Perceiver (P)?

In this podcast, we explore some general characteristics of Judging (J) and Perceiving (P) types. We also discuss how the J-P preference relates to a type's functions and why it can be particularly tricky for introverts to sort out their true J-P status.

02-18
32:15

Episode 2: Introverts & Extraverts

In this podcast, we explore key personality differences between introverts and extraverts, as well as their respective paths to growth and development. 

12-10
32:54

Episode 1: Intro to the Functions

This podcast provides an overview of the Jungian functions (e.g., Introverted Intuition (Ni)) and discusses their importance with respect to personal development and knowing your true Myers-Briggs personality type (e.g., INFJ).

11-14
25:01

Sarah Collins

what you are describing with introverts and extroverts is the difference in how they learn. I am a teacher and I see this all the time. Extroverts learn by doing...they jump in and engage, they recognize patterns in the real world as they go and then take the time latter to work out the explanation for why it happened. Introverts do the opposite, they learn by predicting....they form and explanation for why something could or does happen and then wait to see if their prediction comes to fruition in the real world. In other words, intoverts make a judgement first through their predictions while extroverts make observations first by just doing and engaging. This means that the classification of judging and perceiving function are wrong half the time. eg Si and Ni are judging not perceiving functions. Si's are judging good and bad effects and reactions based on past experience, while Ni's are judging good and bad causes or reasons based on the possibilities presented. ( they then confir

01-05 Reply

Recommend Channels