Claim Ownership
Practical Ethics Bites
Subscribed: 380Played: 1,260
Subscribe
© Oxford University
Description
Practical Ethics Bites is a series of audio podcasts on practical ethics targeted specifically at pupils studying philosophy in UK schools. It is produced by the team behind the popular podcast Philosophy Bites, David Edmonds and Nigel Warburton. Philosophy Bites has had over 21 million downloads. David Edmonds is a Senior Research Associate at Oxford’s Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics and all the interviewees are academics linked to the Uehiro Centre. The series aims to be a free educational resource for teachers. Each interview is around 20 minutes long.
9 Episodes
Reverse
Top Podcasts
The Best New Comedy Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best News Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Business Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Sports Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New True Crime Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Joe Rogan Experience Podcast Right Now – June 20The Best New Dan Bongino Show Podcast Right Now – June 20The Best New Mark Levin Podcast – June 2024
err, would muchos appreciate more bites.
Very informative. Thank you!
Pardon me, but didn't Kant weasel out of the axe murderer analogy by stating that 'misleading truths' are okay. Honestly, I was on the fence about that too. x'D I'm always impressed by how well spoken most guests are. :o
Tldl; Two arguments: a. People have a right to privacy and sexual orientation falls within that ambit, it does not infringe on the rights of others. Social, moral (moral wrt individual choices on morality which don't affect others substantially) norms can't be imposed on citizens by the state as it infringes on personal liberty, freedom of expression. (How did we arrive at these rights is more complicated. we'd have to consider theories on formation of State and the source of its power). b. sexual orientation is not based on choice and hence unfair to discriminate based on it. (no culpability). - Hypothetically if gene editing/any other tech allows people to choose their sexual orientation this argument would become weak. hence we must rely on argument (a).
The practical ethics channel does not fail. :) I also like the YouTube channel. Thanks for the work!