Science Conversations

The evidence is overwhelming: radiometric dating methods simply don’t match up with real-world geological data. In part 2 of this explosive series, Kaysie Vokurka and Dr. John Ashton dig even deeper into the evidence that’s shaking the foundations of evolutionary timelines.What You’ll Discover in This Episode: • Why erosion rates prove continents couldn’t possibly survive for billions of years• Ocean sediment thickness reveals Earth’s true age (not the claimed 2.5 billion years)• Volcanic evidence that completely upends evolutionary dating• Where all the missing sediment went—according to biblical flood geology• How Grand Canyon rocks show impossible preservation over supposed millions of years Dr. Ashton shares jaw-dropping calculations: at current volcanic output rates (1 cubic mile per year), Earth should be buried under 12 miles of volcanic material if it were truly billions of years old. Instead, measurements show only 34 million years’ worth—a massive discrepancy that mainstream science can’t explain. The Biblical Flood Model Explains the Evidence: • Rapid sedimentation during catastrophic global events• Massive volcanic activity during the “fountains of the deep”• Mountain uplift explains marine fossils found at high elevations• Fossil preservation demands rapid, large-scale burial Key Evidence Highlighted: • Tambora volcano (1815): 25–70 cubic miles ejected in a single event• Lake Taupo: 260 cubic miles of material released• Historical lava flows radiometrically dated at millions of years when actually decades old This is part 2 of 3 in our radiometric dating investigation. Subscribe for more faith-affirming science content that challenges evolutionary assumptions with real evidence. Check out our other podcasts:Browse all playlists here www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists

The age of the earth and radiometric dating. Evolutionary theory depends on assumed long ages of the earth, with fossil bearing strata estimated to be hundreds of millions of years old. Radiometric dating results appear to support and validate these long timeframes. Does all available data converge with this? Other evidence, such as continental and mountain erosion rates, does not align with these long time-periods and instead presents a much younger earth. How does this impact evolutionary assumptions? Check out our other podcasts: https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists

The great flood of Noah.The Biblical flood story has been passed off as mythical by many. While there is no doubt that the story is miraculous, extra-biblical records of an ancient "flood story" are incredibly consistent with the Bible's account. These additional flood stories are found in cultures all over the world. What does all this mean for the story of a global flood? Is the story realistic? Is the historical evidence consistent?  Check out our other podcasts: https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts 

Evidence for the flood. Sedimentary rock layers lie conformably over each other, without evidence of erosion between them. This is the case even when the layers are unconventional. For example, entire sections of layers are missing in some locations, which represents gaps of tens to hundreds of millions of years, according to the conventional geologic column. Yet there is no evidence of erosion where the missing layers should be. In other instances, older rocks are situated on top of younger rocks, and do so over dozens of square kilometres. Once more, the layers sit perfectly over one another without surface disturbance. What explains this kind of evidence best? Long-age processes or a single global flood event? Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

Fossil evidence for evolution. Many rock layers contain fossils of both extinct species and species that exist today. This presents a fascinating opportunity to see if the species alive today have evolved compared to their fossilised ancestors. Research examining this found no change between the species, despite the assumed age of the fossils being millions of years in the past. If evolution occurred and continues to occur, why haven't the species alive today changed dramatically? Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

Fossil evidence for evolution. Certain rock layers contain numerous different fossilised organisms not found in the layers below them. Cambrian rock is a good example of this. Cambrian fossils are all fully-formed species - no intermediates. The layers underneath have no intermediates either, nor evidence of erosion which would suggest missing rock layers. The fully-formed species just suddenly appear in the so-called "Cambrian Explosion". Where are the intermediate fossils? What does this mean for evolution? Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

Fossil evidence for evolution. Evolutionists claim that the fossil record provides the most fundamental evidence that evolution occurred. If evolution did indeed occur, we would expect evidence for this to permeate all levels of investigation in the fossil record - from first glance to the finest details. Assuming the fossil record represents long ages, examples of intermediate species in evolutionary transition should be found captured in the rock layers. But is this actually what we see? Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

Fossils and archaeology. Evolutionary assumptions place fossil formation millions of years in the past. However, fossils themselves present some problems with this assumption. Many palaeontologists have now been able to extract soft tissues from fossils, such as proteins, DNA, collagen, red blood cells and haemoglobin. These molecules are very delicate and degrade in 20,000 years or less in average conditions. This evidence is completely at odds with long age theories. Soft tissue molecules, such as DNA, also provide evidence that directly challenges conventional thought about species evolution. Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

The fossil record presents some stunning realities about what life was like on earth in the past. The diversity of life species was extraordinary compared to what we have today. Fossils also tell a story of massive extinction. And the way the fossil record has preserved evidence of these countless different species can only be conceivable through catastrophic conditions. If at first the fossil record seemed to indicate long age rock layer and fossil formation by gradual processes, the evidence that has now accumulated calls this into serious question. Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

The fossil record is considered to be the primary foundational evidence that validates evolution. Geologists have thought it seems to paint a picture of long ages and slow gradual processes in which species grew to be more complex over time. This perspective was a foundational viewpoint for Darwin when he developed his evolutionary theory. But is this the picture the fossil record really paints of the past? Are there clues in the fossil record that suggest what happening in the past was very different? Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

How did life on earth start? Evolutionists assert that life began on earth about 3.7-4.5 billion years ago. This is based on radiometric dating of the fossil record and the rock beds they are found in. While this time frame is questionable, a bigger question is how did life arise at that time? Could it have emerged spontaneously from non-living material? Could it have come to earth from outer space? Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

What is the evidence for evolution? Darwin's belief about human evolution was influenced by Thomas H. Huxley, who proposed that humans descended from apes. This was evident to Darwin because of the anatomical similarities shared between humans and apes. Darwin also was persuaded that humans descended from fish, based on the notion that the embryonic state of each species indicates the structure of their less developed ancient progenitors. At that time, it was assumed that the embryos of many different species were fish-like. Subsequent scientific research has given evidence that these ideas are highly inconclusive at best, and in the case of the embryos, false. Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

What is the evidence for evolution? Biologists have worked hard through the one and a half centuries since Darwin published his theory of evolution to gather supporting evidence for it. Much of the initial evidence was rooted in the fossil record, which suggested species evolution from lower to more advanced organisms in context of a long age time reference. Evolutionary links between species were assumed based on skeletal and physical similarities, and stemmed back from an unknown universal common ancestor. But the understanding of genetics has challenged these initial views due to the surprising and unlikely gene matches that have been discovered. This leaves the accumulated evidence for Darwin's tree of life model in a conflicted position. Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

What is the evidence for evolution? Darwin was a keen and thoughtful observer of the things around him. Influenced by the mechanistic mindset of his time, Darwin sought to understand and explain the diversity of species and their traits through natural processes. This investigation led him to develop his concept of natural selection, which combined with a long-age time reference, became his theory of evolution. Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

Is Evolution a fact? Has evolution ever been observed in action? Does the fossil record reflect the evolutionary process? Is there any case where species mutations naturally gain genetic information? The short answer is No. How do evolutionary scientists respond to this? Where does this leave evolution? Watch seried on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq Check out our other podcasts: https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists

Is evolution a fact? Evolution has a zero probability, yet it is regarded as an "inescapable fact". Is there any real world evidence that show life forms evolving from primitive organisms? Mathematically, the probability of this has been deemed impossible. Some have even acknowledged that "no one knows how it [evolution] works". How then is evolutionary theory maintaining a foothold? Watch this video to get some clear answers. Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq Check out our other podcasts: https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists  

Is evolution a fact? Many people think so, and it's easy to see why, considering how widely this idea is taught. But does what seems irrefutable have strong underpinning evidence? How much of the evidence needed to establish evolution as an unequivocal fact do we actually have? Watch on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq Check out our other podcasts: https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists

The great flood of Noah. The book of Genesis records the lifespan of key individuals that lived on earth before the flood. It also accurately records when the flood occurred and the age of key individuals after the flood. While the age of those who lived before the flood averaged 900 years, the ages of those living after the flood dropped dramatically to 100-200 years within a few generations. How realistic are these lifespan records? Is there any evidence that supports these ages, along with a dramatic age reduction in a post-flood world scenario? Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

The great flood of Noah.The flood story tells us that humanity was destroyed by the floodwaters except for 8 people who were spared on the ark. These people multiplied and spread out over the earth after the flood. The Bible records the genealogies of the first generations to be born after the flood, and notes that at a certain point, they spread out extensively over the earth. Is the historical evidence for the founders and starting points of ancient nations consistent with the Biblical record? Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

Evidence for the flood. Fossils in sedimentary layers provide clues regarding the nature and dynamics of rock formation conditions. Fossil footprint trackways provide significant evidence for catastrophic conditions. They paint a picture of all kinds of animals fleeing to higher ground while wading through fast moving water. Polystrate fossil trees also point to a dramatic past. Stripped of their tops and roots, these logs floated in an upright position and were buried in the same orientation through multiple different layers of sediment. These logs often contain fossils of animals and sea creatures mixed together. All of this evidence is most consistent with a global catastropic flood...an event which even explains the Ice-Age!   Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts