Simply Trade

Host: Cindy Allen Show: Simply Trade – Cindy’s Version Published: March 20, 2026 Length: ~15 minutes Presented by: Global Training Center Wishlist: Importers Just Want IEEPA Refunds + CBP’s New “Customs Business” Bombshell Cindy Allen delivers her signature Taylor Swift–inspired trade update (“Wishlist” from the latest album), channeling importers’ singular desire: “I just want you, Mr. Refund.” She covers DHS budget chaos, petrodollar threats from the Strait of Hormuz closure, Jones Act waiver talks, and a seismic CBP ruling that redefines classification, OCR, and CF-5106 work as customs business. What You’ll Learn in This Episode DHS funding crisis No Congressional budget agreement—TSA, FEMA, non-LEO CBP staff (Office of Trade, admins) not getting paid; TSA lines lengthening as agents take second jobs. CBP officers funded via prior “big beautiful bill,” but broader agency operations strained. No impact yet from Kristi Noem’s DHS exit. Strait of Hormuz & petrodollar shift 20–40% of world oil flow halted; India secured safe passage deal, China negotiating oil payments in yuan—challenging petrodollar system (U.S. dollar as reserve currency since 1970s OPEC deal). Could erode USD value, force global banks to rethink reserves, impact U.S. debt/economy beyond just gas prices (countries releasing strategic reserves for short-term relief). Jones Act & USMCA updates Administration eyeing Jones Act waivers for chemicals, energy, fertilizers to ease oil crisis transport limits. U.S.–Mexico technical teams meeting regularly on USMCA progress (extension preferred over renegotiation); Canada tensions delay trilateral talks. Trump postpones China trade trip. CBP bombshell: HQ 350722 ruling Internal advice ruling deems OCR conversion of shipping data, classification for importers, and CF-5106 filings (importer/ultimate consignee setup) as “customs business” requiring licensed customs brokers. Overturns prior practice where importers could use non-broker consultants for these (often to check broker work or build databases). Likely legal challenges ahead; chills AI/OCR tools offered directly to importers. IEEPA Refund “Wishlist” Deep Dive Importers want simple answers on CBP’s CAPE refund process (Excel declarations via ACE)—but open questions persist: Court actions/protests needed for final vs. protestable (180-day window) entries? CAPE scope: Simple IEEPA refunds only, or complex EU/Japan agreements (15% caps), reconciliation, drawback? Entry summary updates in ACE (system of record)? What if an entry’s accidentally omitted—does Treasury keep funds? Judge indicated all IEEPA duties unlawful; no clear administrative refund mechanism yet. Key Takeaways Importers: Review internal processes against HQ 350722; consult brokers/attorneys on consultant/AI/OCR workflows. Read CBP’s full ruling; track IEEPA CAPE mechanics and court filings. Travel tip: Extra time for TSA lines. Watch petrodollar erosion and fuel surcharge ripple effects. Credits Host: Cindy Allen Producer: Annik Sobing   Subscribe & Follow • YouTube • Spotify • Apple Podcasts Join the conversation with fellow trade professionals in the Trade Geeks Community: https://globaltrainingcenter.com/portal/?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast

Hosts:  Andy Shiles & Lalo Solorzano Guest: Vincent “Vinny” Annunziato – Former CBP Director, Trade Technology Leader, Founder of Digital Supply Chain Innovations (DSCI), SVP at Profit Trust LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vincentrobertannunziato/ Published : March 19, 2026 Length: ~35 minutes Presented by: Global Training Center 🧠 Episode Summary In this episode of Simply Trade, we sit down with Vincent “Vinny” Annunziato for his first appearance post-retirement from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Vinny reflects on a remarkable career shaping some of the most impactful trade modernization efforts, including the Single Window initiative, and shares behind-the-scenes insights into how these systems were built, challenged, and ultimately delivered. Now on the private sector side, Vinny discusses his transition, his new work with Profit Trust, and how companies can uncover hidden opportunities for duty recovery and cost savings. The conversation also dives deep into AI in trade compliance, cutting through the hype to explain what actually works today—and what doesn’t. From large language models to human-assisted decision-making, Vinny brings a practical, no-nonsense perspective that trade professionals can immediately apply.   🔑 Key Learnings The real story behind the Single Window and how it transformed multi-agency trade data Why collaboration between government and industry changed the game in customs processing How innovation works inside government—and why not everything makes it to production The truth about AI in trade compliance (and why most companies are using it wrong) Why “Human-Assisted Technology (HAT)” may be the smarter way to think about AI The importance of data quality and business context before applying AI solutions How companies are using tools like duty recovery and audit analytics to improve their bottom line   💡 Key Takeaways AI is not a magic solution—it’s only as good as the data and business logic behind it Trade compliance decisions—especially classification—must remain human-led Innovation requires balancing technical vision with real-world business application The future of trade lies in connected, interoperable global data systems There are still significant untapped opportunities for companies to recover duties and reduce costs 🔗 Resources & Mentions Profit Trust (duty recovery & shipping optimization solutions) ACE (Automated Commercial Environment) Single Window Initiative ITDS (International Trade Data System) Lacey Act (referenced in system design discussion) 🎧 Credits Hosts: Lalo Solorzano – LinkedIn Andy Shiles – LinkedIn Guest: Vincent “Vinny” Annunziato – Former CBP Director, Trade Technology Leader, Founder of Digital Supply Chain Innovations (DSCI), SVP at Profit Trust LinkedIn Producer: Lalo Solorzano 📢 Subscribe & Follow New episodes every week. Presented by: Global Training Center — providing education, consulting, workshops, and compliance resources for trade professionals. 👉 www.GlobalTrainingCenter.com Connect with us: Simply Trade Podcast on LinkedIn Global Training Center on LinkedIn YouTube Spotify Apple Podcasts Trade Geeks Community Don’t forget to rate, review, and share with your fellow trade geeks!

Hosts: Renee Chiuchiarelli & Julie Parks Format: Simply Trade Tips Length: ~12 minutes Episode Summary Renee and Julie break down how organizational structure—centralized, decentralized, matrix, or hybrid—directly impacts compliance success. Learn practical "tweaks" to move customs from a reactive support function to a proactive strategic partner. Key Takeaways & Fixes 1. Centralized Structure The Issue: Customs reacts to problems after decisions are made. The Fix: Embed controls upstream; ensure Customs has authority, not just execution duties. 💡 Truth Bomb: If you touch data after the PO is issued, you’re already too late. 2. Decentralized Structure The Issue: Inconsistent data and fragmented processes across regions. The Fix: Centralize governance and data visibility while allowing regional execution. 💡 Rule: Decentralized execution is fine; decentralized compliance is not. 3. Matrix Structure The Issue: Decision gridlock and competing priorities. The Fix: Define decision-making authority in writing and align funding across stakeholders. 💡 Reality Check: Without alignment, Customs becomes a referee, not a facilitator. 4. Hybrid Structure (The Goal) The Issue: Often misperceived as a cost center rather than a value driver.   The Fix: Separate governance from operations; involve Customs in sourcing and risk-based audits. Failure Patterns to Avoid Compliance fails in any structure when: Authority doesn't match responsibility. Brokers are treated as the "owners" of compliance. Leadership only engages during a crisis. FIO (Figure It Out) – This Week’s Action Identify your current structure and pick one area for improvement. Write it into your goals and align it with business priorities to start seeing incremental change. Hosts: Renee Chiuchiarelli & Julie Parks Published: October 28, 2025 Length: ~10 minutes Presented by: Global Training Center 👻 Episode Summary It’s a special Halloween edition of Simply Trade [Tips] with Hammer and Heels (Renee & Julie)! 🎙️ In this spooky seasonal episode, the hosts share “scary compliance stories” that every trade professional can learn from — tales of audits that wouldn’t die, supply chain skeletons, and hauntingly complex importer-of-record issues. Between these frighteningly true stories and a fun “Trick-or-Treat: Fact or Fiction” lightning round, listeners will pick up valuable lessons about risk, recordkeeping, and compliance best practices — all while getting into the Halloween spirit. 🧠 Key Takeaways Importer of Record Issues: Never assume your company should make entry — confirm the proper party has the right to do so. Audit Nightmares: A prior disclosure can protect you from penalties, but only if it’s complete and accurate. Double-check everything before submitting. Trick or Treat: Compliance Edition! Can CBP review your General Ledger? ✅ Treat! Do you need to reconcile quantity variances with Customs entries? ✅ Treat! Is your broker solely responsible for recordkeeping? ❌ Trick! Importers must maintain their records for at least five years. Is a parts database a strong compliance tool? ✅ Treat! It helps ensure data accuracy and consistency. 🧭 FIO (Figure It Out) 👉 This week’s action item: Trade can be terrifying — but preparation keeps the ghosts away! Take time to review your compliance “skeletons in the closet.” Are your prior disclosures accurate and auditable? Is your importer of record process clear? Do your records meet the five-year rule? And since it’s Halloween… figure out your costume, too! 🎭 💬 Keep the Conversation Going Join the Trade Geeks Community at Global Training Center and share: Your own “scary compliance story.” How you’ve handled tricky audits or importer-of-record nightmares. And, of course, what you’re dressing up as for Halloween! 🎧 Credits Hosts: Renee Chiuchiarelli Julie Parks Producer: Lalo Solorzano 📲 Subscribe & Follow 🎙️ New TIPS episodes every Tuesday. Presented by: Global Training Center — providing education, consulting, workshops, and compliance resources for trade professionals. Connect with us: Simply Trade Podcast on LinkedIn Global Training Center on LinkedIn YouTube Spotify Apple Podcasts Trade Geeks Community Don’t forget to rate, review, and share with your fellow trade geeks! 📩 Want to be on the show or suggest a topic? Email us at SimplyTrade@GlobalTrainingCenter.com or DM us on X/Twitter @SimplyTradePod

Host: Lori Mullins Guests: Rich Roche, Ashley Craig Series: NCBFAA Quarterly Podcast – Transportation Committee Focus Published: March 2026 Length: ~40 minutes Presented by: National Customs Brokers & Forwarders Association of America (NCBFAA) in partnership with Simply Trade​ NCBFAA Transportation Committee: Strait of Hormuz, FMC, and Shipping Risk in 2026 In this NCBFAA quarterly episode, social media director and licensed customs broker Lori Mullins sits down with Rich Roche, Senior Vice President at Mohawk Global Logistics and NCBFAA NVOCC Chair, and Ashley Craig, partner at Venable LLP and outside Transportation Counsel to NCBFAA, for a deep dive on the work of the NCBFAA Transportation Committee in a rapidly changing risk environment.​ The conversation focuses on how the Transportation Committee is engaging with regulators—especially the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC)—and monitoring global chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz to protect brokers, forwarders, and NVOCCs.​ Inside the NCBFAA Transportation Committee’s Agenda FMC leadership and priorities Rich explains the “new season” at FMC under Chair Laura DiBella, with NCBFAA meeting her on day one and tracking the confirmation of additional commissioners to get the agency to full strength.​ The committee is watching FMC’s expanded role, including analyzing global “choke points” (like the Iran conflict and Spanish embargo actions) and supporting efforts to close the harbor maintenance fee loophole for cargo routed via Canada and Mexico.​ Strait of Hormuz and global chokepoints Ashley breaks down why the Strait of Hormuz—only about 20 nautical miles wide and dominated geographically by Iran—remains one of the most critical choke points in global energy and trade, carrying roughly 60% of petroleum productsexiting the region.​ Rich details current impacts: hundreds of tankers and cargo vessels effectively stopped or trapped, export bookings halted, and knock-on effects on fuel availability for airlines and ocean carriers, particularly in Asia.​ Legal and commercial risk: surcharges, notice, and the Shipping Act Ashley walks through how tensions translate into war risk surcharges and emergency contingency charges from major carriers (Maersk, CMA, Hapag-Lloyd, MSC, ONE), and the critical 30‑day notice requirement under the Shipping Act for U.S. trades—plus how “special permission” filings at the FMC can accelerate those timelines.​ The Transportation Committee is monitoring FMC guidance reminding carriers and NVOCCs of their obligations to publish and adhere to filed rates, and educating members on when to go to FMC vs. resolving disputes under service contracts or through courts/ADR.​ Export controls and NCBFAA’s export subcommittee work Ashley highlights the work of the NCBFAA Export Subcommittee, which sits under the Transportation Committee and has collaborated with BIS on the Freight Forwarder Best Practices (now live on the BIS site).​ The committee is tracking evolving sanctions and export controls on Iran and third‑party intermediaries, stressing regular checks of the U.S. consolidated screening lists and ongoing engagement with BIS, OFAC, and other agencies.​ Insurance, force majeure, and contract readiness From a legal and practical standpoint, Ashley urges members to review war risk underwriting, force majeure language, and service contracts now—especially for cargo stuck in the Gulf region—to avoid unmanaged detention/demurrage and misaligned risk allocation.​ The Transportation Committee is encouraging proactive dialogue with carriers and underwriters, not just reactive claims once disruptions surface.​ Energy markets, surcharges, and downstream costs The episode covers how rising oil prices (already over USD 100/barrel with potential to go higher) drive up bunker costs, trigger higher bunker and emergency surcharges, and ultimately raise total transportation costs for shippers and NVOCC customers.​ Policy horizon: tariffs, ship taxes, and Jones Act talk Ashley notes the administration’s heavy focus on maritime policy, new and potential 232/301 investigations, a 301 forced labor inquiry touching over 60 trading partners, and proposals like a “universal ship tax” and land border fee that NCBFAA and peer associations are actively reviewing.​ The committee is also watching discussions around Jones Act waivers for energy flows and coordinating with other trade associations (NITL, World Shipping Council, NRF, NAM, U.S. Chamber) to present a unified industry position.​ Why This Matters for NCBFAA Members Throughout the episode, Lori, Rich, and Ashley underscore the resilience of the brokerage and forwarding community and the central role of NCBFAA—especially the Transportation Committee and its export subcommittee—in: Interpreting fast‑moving developments at choke points like the Persian Gulf. Engaging directly with FMC, BIS, Treasury, USTR, and Congress. Providing practical guidance on surcharges, notice rules, contracts, underwriting, and compliance expectations.​ Lori closes by inviting non‑members to join NCBFAA and tap into its toolkits, best practices, and ongoing advocacy, and reminding listeners that this is part of a quarterly NCBFAA podcast series focused on the committees’ work on behalf of the trade. Subscribe & Follow Stay connected with the Simply Trade Podcast: Global Training Center LinkedIn YouTube Spotify Apple Podcasts Trade Geeks Community ​

Host: Annik Sobing Guest: Colleen, Trade Compliance Recruiting Solutions Recorded at: ICPA Conference (in-person) Published: March 2026 Length: ~15 minutes Presented by: Global Training Center Trade Jobs Are Exploding—But Here’s How to Actually Land One (Live from ICPA) Live from ICPA, Annik sits down in-person with recruiting expert Colleen from Trade Compliance Recruiting Solutions—the boutique firm specializing exclusively in trade compliance roles (import/export, brokerage, analyst to VP). They break down the tight talent market, entry-level realities, resume pitfalls, salary trends, and why busy pros aren’t jumping ship lightly. If you’re job hunting, hiring, or just curious about trade career paths—this is your roadmap. What You’ll Learn in This Episode Entry-level truth Skip certifications first (LCB exam, etc.)—companies want hands-on experienceover credentials. Start anywhere (brokerage, import/export sides) to learn processes, then certify. Passion for global trade > classroom knowledge. Mid-career job search toolkit Free resume reviews from Colleen’s team: ATS-proof keywords, quantifiable achievements, consistent formatting—makes your resume “pop.” They track your skills/location/preferences (remote/hybrid/office) and match future roles—no black-hole applications. Salary & market intel Annual Salary Analysis Report (free on their site/LinkedIn/ICPA): Ranges from specialist to director/VP, based on actual placements. Hiring trends: Companies should streamline (no 6-round interviews for specialists); candidates—avoid emotional jumps. Hot market realities Jobs everywhere—they’re busier than ever, but talent pool is tight (75-day placements vs. prior 60 days). Remote still king; compliance pros too swamped to job hunt actively. Patience pays—define your next role’s challenges/learning. Interview Process Tips Recruiters like hers bypass AI screeners—your vetted resume hits decision-makers directly. Free interview prep: Screening, tips, mock sessions (some pros need the practice). Mentorship for all levels: “Maybe your next step isn’t ready yet—let’s build toward it.” Key Takeaways Leverage networks/conferences like ICPA—build connections beyond job boards. For hirers: Partner with niche recruiters to fill roles faster. For job seekers: Get hands-on > certify; use free tools (resumes, salary data, prep); don’t settle. Trade recruiting is personal—reach out anytime. Market’s hot; something’s out there for everyone. Credits Host: Annik Sobing Guest: Colleen, Trade Compliance Recruiting Solutions Listen & Subscribe Simply Trade main page: https://simplytrade.podbean.com Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/simply-trade/id1640329690 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/09m199JO6fuNumbcrHTkGq Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/8de7d7fa-38e0-41b2-bad3-b8a3c5dc4cda/simply-trade Connect with Simply Trade Podcast page: https://www.globaltrainingcenter.com/simply-trade-podcast LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/simply-trade-podcast YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@SimplyTradePod Join the Trade Geeks Community Trade Geeks (by Global Training Center): https://globaltrainingcenter.com/trade-geeks/

Host: Cindy Allen Published: March 13, 2026 Length: ~15 minutes Presented by: Global Training Center Episode Summary In this week’s episode of Simply Trade: Cindy’s Version, Cindy Allen breaks down the latest developments following the Supreme Court’s decision striking down IEEPA tariffs—and what CBP is proposing as a path forward for duty refunds. CBP has introduced a proposed automated system called CAPE (Consolidated Administration Processing of Entries) to manage refund claims tied to the invalidated tariffs. While the proposal answers some questions, it also raises several new operational considerations for importers and customs brokers. At the same time, global trade policy continues to move quickly. The administration has launched new Section 301 investigations covering 16 major economies, announced forced labor investigations involving 60 countries, and is monitoring supply chain risks tied to oil disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. Inspired by Taylor Swift’s This Is Me Trying, Cindy walks through what we know, what we don’t know yet, and why the trade community may need to remain patient as the refund process takes shape. This Week in Trade • New Section 301 investigations targeting structural excess manufacturing capacity across 16 economies • Forced labor investigations announced involving 60 countries • Ongoing monitoring of supply chain risks tied to the Strait of Hormuz • Possible Jones Act waiver discussions as energy logistics concerns grow IEEPA Refund Process: What We Know So Far Following the Supreme Court decision, CBP has proposed a new automated refund system called CAPE, which would allow importers or brokers to submit claims through a portal connected to ACE. The proposal includes: • A portal-based refund submission process • Automated recalculation of entries with IEEPA duties removed • Updated entry records reflected back into ACE While the framework is promising, several operational questions remain—including how already liquidated entries, reconciliation filings, and broker system updates will be handled. Key Takeaways • CBP is developing a structured process for IEEPA duty refunds • Importers will likely need to submit claims through a CAPE portal • Some refund scenarios remain unclear and may require legal guidance • Major new Section 301 investigations signal continued trade enforcement activity • Global supply chain risks remain elevated due to energy disruptions Credits Host: Cindy Allen - Trade Force Multiplier Producer: Lalo Solorzano Simply Trade is produced by Global Training Center Subscribe & Follow • YouTube • Spotify • Apple Podcasts Join the conversation with fellow trade professionals in the Trade Geeks Community: https://globaltrainingcenter.com/portal/?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast

Simply Trade Podcast Host: Lalo Solorzano Guests: Cindy Deleon, John Metrich Episode Length: ~35 minutes Published: March 2026 Episode Summary In this episode of Simply Trade, Lalo Solorzano sits down with Cindy Deleon and John Metrich from Deleon Trade to explore one of the more complex corners of trade compliance: advanced Section 232 tariff enforcement and metal value content analysis. Recorded shortly after the Advanced Topics in Customs Compliance Conference (ATCC), the conversation dives into how trade professionals are navigating the increasingly sophisticated enforcement environment surrounding Section 232 tariffs. Cindy and John share insights from their work helping companies analyze metal value content, prepare for potential enforcement actions, and think strategically about how these tariffs are being applied in practice. The discussion highlights why Section 232 compliance is no longer just a basic classification issue but often requires deeper operational and sourcing analysis. For trade professionals dealing with steel, aluminum, derivative products, or complex supply chains, this episode provides a valuable look into the advanced compliance considerations shaping today’s trade environment. Key Topics Discussed The purpose and structure of the Advanced Topics in Customs Compliance Conference (ATCC) Why Section 232 compliance has become increasingly complex How metal value content calculations are impacting imports Enforcement trends and what regulators are focusing on The importance of understanding supply chain inputs and sourcing How companies should prepare for deeper scrutiny and potential audits Practical insights from working with importers facing these challenges Key Takeaways 1. Section 232 compliance goes far beyond classification Companies must increasingly analyze the underlying metal value and sourcing behind products to ensure compliance. 2. Enforcement is becoming more sophisticated Regulators are taking a deeper look at supply chains and documentation related to steel and aluminum inputs. 3. Advanced knowledge matters As trade programs evolve, professionals must move beyond basic compliance and develop advanced technical expertise. 4. Education and collaboration are critical Industry events like ATCC help professionals share experiences and tackle the most challenging trade compliance issues together. Resources & Links Cindy Deleon – https://www.linkedin.com/in/cindydeleon/ John Metrich – https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-metrich-3b896a53/ Deleon Trade – https://www.deleontrade.com Advanced Topics in Customs Compliance Conference (ATCC) – https://www.customsconferences.com/ Learn more about trade compliance training – https://www.globaltrainingcenter.com CBP Trade and Cargo Security Summit - April 28, 2026 AAEI Conference - June 23 GTE Conference - July 2 Credits Host: Lalo Solorzano Guests: Cindy Deleon John Metrich Producer: Global Training Center Podcast: Simply Trade Subscribe & Follow Stay connected with the Simply Trade Podcast: Global Training Center LinkedIn YouTube Spotify Apple Podcasts Trade Geeks Community Join the Conversation What are you seeing with Section 232 enforcement and metal value content requirements? Share your thoughts and experiences with the trade community and join the discussion.

Hosts: Renee Chiuchiarelli & Julie Parks Published: March 2026 Format: Simply Trade Tips Length: ~15 minutes Episode Summary In this episode of Simply Trade Tips, hosts Renee Chiuchiarelli and Julie Parks dive deeper into one of the most overlooked drivers of trade compliance success: organizational structure. While many trade professionals focus on technical issues like classification, valuation, or origin rules, Renee and Julie explain that the real barrier to execution is often structural — specifically who owns the budget, who sponsors the program, and how decision-making authority is distributed across the organization. They explore how trade leaders can navigate internal structures, align their messaging with different departments, and build the relationships necessary to secure funding and remove roadblocks. Because in global trade, having the right expertise isn’t enough — you also need the right organizational support to make things happen. Key Topics Discussed • Why organizational structure can make or break a trade compliance program • The importance of understanding who controls the budget • How different departments prioritize risk, cost, and operational goals • What an executive sponsor actually does (and what they don’t do) • Why trade leaders need influence across multiple departments • How to avoid internal “compliance civil wars” Key Insights Budget Ownership Changes Everything When the trade team owns the budget, they can prioritize projects based on compliance risk and operational need. But when another department controls the budget, trade leaders must frame requests in terms that matter to that function — whether that’s ROI, operational efficiency, or system modernization. Speak the Language of the Budget Owner Different departments evaluate trade initiatives through their own lens: • Finance: ROI, penalties avoided, dollars recovered • Supply Chain: speed, predictability, fewer shipment holds • IT: integration, system quality, and security • Legal / Compliance: enforcement risk and regulatory protection Understanding these priorities can dramatically improve the chances of getting initiatives funded. An Executive Sponsor Removes Roadblocks An executive sponsor is not simply someone who encourages the program. A real sponsor: • Clears organizational roadblocks • Influences other executives • Helps secure resources and approvals The right sponsor can dramatically increase the effectiveness of a trade compliance program. Build Strategic Relationships Across Functions Trade rarely sits perfectly within one department. That means trade leaders often need multiple relationships across the organization to make initiatives successful. For example: • Trade under logistics may benefit from a legal sponsor • Trade under legal may need supply chain support • Finance leadership can help secure project funding These partnerships create the influence needed to move compliance initiatives forward. Memorable Line from the Episode “A real sponsor isn’t a cheerleader — it’s someone who clears the roadblocks.” Join the Conversation Have you experienced organizational roadblocks in your trade program? How is your compliance team structured — and does it help or hinder your work? Share your thoughts with the Simply Trade community. Credits Hosts: Renee Chiuchiarelli https://www.linkedin.com/in/renee-chiuchiarelli-lcb-ccs-8964a19/?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast Julie Parks https://www.linkedin.com/in/julie-ann-parks/?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast Producer: Lalo Solorzano https://www.linkedin.com/in/lalosolorzano/?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast 🎧 Subscribe & Follow New Simply Trade Tips episodes every Tuesday. Presented by: Global Training Center — education, consulting, workshops & compliance resources for trade professionals. 👉 https://www.globaltrainingcenter.com/?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast Connect With Us Simply Trade Podcast on LinkedIn Global Training Center on LinkedIn YouTube — https://www.youtube.com/@SimplyTradePod?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/09m199JO6fuNumbcrHTkGq?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast Apple Podcasts — https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/simply-trade/id1640329690?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast Trade Geeks Community — https://www.globaltrainingcenter.com/portal/?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast 💬 Don’t forget to rate, review, and share with your fellow trade geeks! Want to Be on the Show or Have Topic Suggestions? 📧 SimplyTrade@GlobalTrainingCenter.com 🐦 Twitter/X: @SimplyTradePod

Host: Annik Sobing Guests: Jennifer Varney (Volvo Group), Penny Chen (PAX) Recorded at: ICPA Conference, San Antonio, TX Published: March 2026 Length: ~25 minutes Presented by: Global Training Center AI Meets Trade Compliance: From Auto Supply Chains to AI Live from ICPA San Antonio, Annik sits down with Jennifer from Volvo Group and Penny from PAX for an all‑women, International Women’s Day‑timed conversation about how AI is actually being used in trade compliance today—far beyond the buzzwords. They explore the reality of AI inside a massively complex automotive supply chain, how duty drawback is being reimagined with AI, and what trade teams should think about before buying or building any tools.​ What You’ll Learn in This Episode Session highlights from ICPA Jennifer: Practical implementation of AI to support customs clearance at the enterprise level—how one company uses AI to survive an “ever‑changing and incredibly volatile” trade landscape. Penny: A “beginner‑friendly” intro to general AI tools, how large language models work, and how trade compliance leaders can evaluate AI quality and fit.​ The automotive reality: 1,000+ policy changes and thousands of parts In just the last year, there have been 1,000+ trade policy changes worldwide, affecting about 5 trillion dollars in spend. Most of the real impact comes from trade barrier changes, not facilitation measures. A single vehicle can have 2,000–3,000 parts sourced from thousands of suppliers globally, some in‑house, some external. New demands around Section 232 (steel/aluminum/copper), forced labor, EUDR, connected vehicle rules, dual‑use, etc. mean OEMs must know their supply base down to raw material origin and processing, sometimes 5–6 tiers deep.​ Why human-only workflows can’t keep up Many tier‑1 suppliers don’t even have the data OEMs now must report, or consider it proprietary. Trade teams are drowning in documentation, entry creation, and ever‑changing regulatory demands—falling behind risks blocked shipments and massive cost. Jennifer’s view: AI is less about replacing people and more about augmenting limited resources before they’re “buried under all of the legislative changes.”​ Where AI fits in (and where it doesn’t) Example use case: consolidating multiple documents (PO, invoice, BL, shipping manifest) to build a single 7501—AI reads different formats, extracts the right fields, and populates data so humans review instead of retyping. Penny’s rule of thumb: if it’s a task you’d happily delegate to an intern, it’s a candidate for automation or semi‑automation. AI frees people to focus on high‑value work: audits, wider coverage (5% → 99%), forecasting regulatory changes, and adjusting systems/processes for what’s coming next.​ Starting your AI journey: practical adoption path Step 1: Use free or existing tools (e.g., Microsoft Copilot) for summaries, data cleaning, and simple tasks. Step 2: When needs get more complex, consider specialized AI tools (like PAX’s AI‑powered duty drawback service), but pair them with solid ROI analysis: cost vs. time savings vs. recovered dollars. Step 3: For large enterprises, begin with defining pain points and a data strategy: Where do you spend the most time? Which activity is eating 90% of your bandwidth? What data will go into AI, and what exactly do you want back out?​ Overcoming fear and building buy‑in Penny’s take: curiosity is your best ally—if you don’t know how to use AI, start by asking AI how to use AI. Jennifer’s advice: Engage stakeholders early; give them a voice in how the tool is designed and used. Set realistic expectations—even with aggressive automation, maybe only ~30% of workload can be automated today. Focus human effort on strategy and change management, not repetitive admin.​ Choosing the “right” AI for your team Not every company needs every AI—e.g., if you classify one item a month, a classification platform may not be worth it. For trade leaders, tool selection should be guided by: Where you lose the most time or money. Data type mix (text + structured data). Compliance/guardrail needs and vendor transparency about models and controls. Conferences like ICPA are key: they surface real use cases, connect trade and tech experts, and help teams refine what they actually need.​ International Women’s Day Spotlight This episode also celebrates International Women’s Day and highlights women leading in trade, tech, and compliance—from OEMs to AI startups. Annik closes with a shoutout to all women in trade who are building, leading, and pushing the industry forward.​ Credits Host: Annik Sobing Guests: Jennifer (Volvo Group), Penny (PAX) Recorded at: ICPA Conference, San Antonio, TX   Listen & Subscribe Simply Trade main page: https://simplytrade.podbean.com​ Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/simply-trade/id1640329690​ Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/09m199JO6fuNumbcrHTkGq​ Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/8de7d7fa-38e0-41b2-bad3-b8a3c5dc4cda/simply-trade​ Connect with Simply Trade Podcast page: https://www.globaltrainingcenter.com/simply-trade-podcast​ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/simply-trade-podcast​ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@SimplyTradePod​ Join the Trade Geeks Community Trade Geeks (by Global Training Center): https://globaltrainingcenter.com/trade-geeks/  

Host: Cindy Allen Show: Simply Trade – Cindy’s Version Published: March 6, 2026 Length: ~13 minutes Presented by: Global Training Center Ready For It? CBP’s IEEPA Refund Proposal Drops—Here’s What’s Next Cindy Allen, CEO of TradeForce Multiplier, dives into the latest trade developments through Taylor Swift’s “Ready For It?”—perfect for the “let the games begin” drama unfolding in IEEPA refund hearings. From DHS shakeups and Section 122 lawsuits to CBP’s just‑filed refund blueprint, Cindy unpacks the mechanics, open questions, and what importers/brokers should do now.​ What You’ll Learn in This Episode DHS leadership change Secretary Noem removed; scuttlebutt suggests more exits at DHS/CBP headquarters. New nominee: Oklahoma senator with broad congressional/President support (not yet formal).​ Section 122 tariff challenges 24 states sue in Court of International Trade, arguing Section 122 doesn’t meet “imbalance of payments” requirement for universal tariffs. Commerce Secretary Besant hints at 15% rate hikes for specific industries, potentially violating Section 122’s uniform application rule—no movement yet (as of Friday afternoon).​ USMCA signals Congress supports extension, but President has final say. Discussions on trilateral vs. bilateral (U.S.–Canada, U.S.–Mexico); some push for 1‑year extension to renegotiate post‑tariff chaos.​ Global disruptions Iran war halts Strait of Hormuz traffic, backing up oil tankers and vessels reliant on that fuel—broad transportation ripple effects.​ USTR advisory opportunity Nominations open for 4 USTR trade advisory groups (separate from COAC)—check Federal Register notices. Chance to influence policy, build government/industry relationships.​ Why “Ready For It?” Cindy channels Taylor Swift’s “Ready For It?” for the IEEPA refund “dating game” between DOJ, CBP, and CIT: Federal Circuit rejected government’s 90‑day delay request, remanded immediately to CIT. CIT hearing (March 4) was “entertaining” bickering—judge ruled no suit needed for non‑final entries and ordered CBP to liquidate without IEEPA duties. CIT conference (March 6, closed): CBP filed a refund proposal.​ CBP’s IEEPA Refund Proposal Breakdown How it would work: Importers file ACE declaration with Excel list of affected entries. ACE runs validations, auto‑recalculates IEEPA refund. CBP verifies declaration accuracy. ACE auto‑liquidates; CBP certifies; Treasury issues refunds (as normal). Estimated 45 days for CBP programming.​ Open questions: Entry updates: ACE is system of record—will underlying entry summaries be corrected? (Critical for protests, PSCs, reconciliation, drawback.) Broker involvement: ABI required? Broker systems need programming? Push/pull updates? Reconciliation: How handled in bulk process? PSC/audit impact: Can filers still correct misclassifications post‑bulk liquidation? (Protests harder than PSC.) Liquidation halt: CBP questions authority to pause during 45‑day programming (hundreds of thousands liquidated March 6).​ Key Takeaways CIT has jurisdiction; expect CBP proposal review/dialogue—trade associations pushing entry updates. Programming delays + ABI sync = potential months before refunds flow. Liquidation is automatic unless stopped—monitor your entries closely. “Let the games begin”—are you ready for the IEEPA refund process?​ Credits Host: Cindy Allen Producer: Annik Sobing  Listen & Subscribe Simply Trade main page: https://simplytrade.podbean.com​ Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/simply-trade/id1640329690​ Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/09m199JO6fuNumbcrHTkGq​ Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/8de7d7fa-38e0-41b2-bad3-b8a3c5dc4cda/simply-trade​ Connect with Simply Trade Podcast page: https://www.globaltrainingcenter.com/simply-trade-podcast​ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/simply-trade-podcast​ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@SimplyTradePod​ Join the Trade Geeks Community Trade Geeks (by Global Training Center): https://globaltrainingcenter.com/trade-geeks/  

Hosts: Lalo Solorzano Guests: Eric Hargraves – Elliott Davis Cindy Allen – Trade Force Multiplier Mark Segrist – Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg Recorded Live At: The International Compliance Professionals Association (ICPA) Annual Conference in San Antonio. Episode Summary In this special live conference episode, Lalo sits down with three trade experts at the ICPA Annual Conference to unpack one of the biggest trade law developments in years: the Supreme Court ruling limiting the use of IEEPA for tariff authority. Together, Eric Hargraves, Cindy Allen, and Mark Segrist break down what the decision actually means, how the administration pivoted immediately to other tariff tools, and why importers should not assume refunds are guaranteed. The conversation dives into the legal fallout, enforcement uncertainty, and compliance strategies companies should be thinking about right now, including protests, litigation strategies, and how trade compliance is rapidly becoming a C-suite level issue. If you’re trying to understand the real-world impact of the ruling, tariff stacking, and what actions importers should be taking today, this discussion delivers practical insight straight from the conference floor. Key Takeaways The Supreme Court Limited Presidential Tariff Authority Under IEEPA The Court ruled that the president cannot impose tariffs using IEEPA, emphasizing that taxation powers belong to Congress under the Constitution. The Administration Immediately Pivoted to Other Tools With IEEPA tariffs struck down, the administration quickly shifted toward Section 122 and other statutory authorities, showing that tariff policy will continue through different mechanisms. Tariff Stacking and Complexity Are Increasing Importers now face potential layers of tariffs under Section 232, Section 301, Section 122, and other mechanisms, making duty calculations and compliance far more complex. Refunds Are Not Guaranteed Even though the ruling invalidated certain tariffs, experts warn that refunds are not automatic, and companies must actively preserve their rights. Importers Must Take Action Now Companies should be monitoring liquidation dates, filing protests when necessary, and considering litigation options to protect their ability to recover duties. Trade Compliance Is Now a Strategic Function Trade and customs issues have moved from back-office compliance work to strategic discussions at the executive level, impacting supply chains, costs, and global operations. Notable Topics Discussed The Supreme Court decision on IEEPA tariffs Section 122 as the administration’s immediate fallback tool How tariff stacking affects real duty rates Litigation strategies and the growing role of the Court of International Trade Why companies should file protests and protect their refund rights The rise of trade compliance as a strategic corporate function Resources & References International Compliance Professionals Association (ICPA) ICPA on LinkedIn ICPA LinkedIn Group About the Guests Eric Hargraves A trade and customs specialist with Elliott Davis who advises companies on navigating complex regulatory frameworks and trade enforcement issues. Cindy Allen Founder of Trade Force Multiplier and a leading voice in customs compliance, supply chain strategy, and global trade education. Mark Segrist Attorney with Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg focusing on international trade law, customs regulations, and tariff litigation. Join the Conversation What do you think this ruling means for importers and future tariff policy? Join the discussion and share your thoughts with the Simply Trade community. Credits Host: Lalo Solorzano Guests: Eric Hargraves Cindy Allen Mark Segrist Produced by: Global Training Center Subscribe & Follow Follow Simply Trade to stay updated on the latest insights in global trade and customs compliance. YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@simplytradepod Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/09m199JO6fuNumbcrHTkGq Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/simply-trade/id1640329690 Connect With Us Lalo Solorzano: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lalosolorzano/ Andy Shiles: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andyshiles/ Global Training Center: https://www.linkedin.com/company/global-training-center Join the Trade Geeks community: https://globaltrainingcenter.com/portal/

Hosts: Renee Chiuchiarelli & Julie Parks Length: ~15 minutes Format: Simply Trade Tips Episode Summary Welcome to Series 6 of Simply Trade Tips. This series tackles a foundational — and often overlooked — issue in global trade: Where does Customs actually sit inside your organization? In this opening episode, Renee and Julie lay the groundwork by breaking down the three most common organizational structures and how each one impacts customs operations, compliance authority, budgeting, and risk management. Because here’s the truth: Customs rarely fails because people don’t care. It fails because it’s structurally misaligned. This episode sets the foundation for understanding how org structure dictates decision-making, funding, escalation paths, and ultimately — compliance outcomes. Why Org Structure Matters for Customs Customs sits in the middle of everything: Procurement Finance Logistics Legal Tax Sales & contracts Export operations Yet it rarely “owns” all the decisions that affect it. That misalignment can create compliance gaps, conflicting priorities, and operational tension between speed and governance. Follow the money. Follow the reporting lines. That’s where risk lives. The Three Core Organizational Structures 1️⃣ Centralized (Functional) Structure Definition: Departments operate in defined lanes (Supply Chain, Finance, Legal, Sales), each with its own leadership. Where Customs Usually Sits: Under Supply Chain Under Legal Occasionally under a dedicated Trade Compliance function Upside: Clear ownership Defined reporting line Often its own budget (if structured well) Downside: Under Supply Chain → can become overly execution-focused (velocity & cost driven) Under Legal → can become overly compliance-focused and disconnected from operations If no independent budget → strategy becomes fragmented Key theme: Budget authority drives strategic control. 2️⃣ Decentralized (Divisional) Structure Definition: Trade responsibilities are spread across business units, regions, or product lines. Each division may manage its own customs activity. Upside: Faster decision-making Direct access to business leaders Local agility Downside: Inconsistent processes across divisions Requires corporate oversight or council to maintain standards Heavy reliance on influence rather than authority This model works — but it requires strong coordination and governance discipline. 3️⃣ Matrix (Hybrid) Structure Definition: Dual reporting lines — often operationally to Supply Chain, dotted line to Legal, Tax, or Finance. This is where many global organizations land. Reality of the Matrix: Multiple “bosses” Consensus-driven decisions Speed vs. compliance tension Performance reviews may not align with dotted-line accountability Success in a matrix requires: Clear budget ownership Clear escalation paths Strong consensus-building skills Mature leadership alignment Without alignment, it becomes a tug-of-war between execution and governance. Customs Operations vs. Customs Compliance A critical distinction discussed in this episode: Customs Operations: Entry filings ACE submissions Broker management Day-to-day problem solving Customs Compliance: Classification governance Valuation methodology Origin policy Audit strategy Risk tolerance Julie and Renee strongly advocate for structural separation of these roles — even in small teams. Why? Operations finds errors. Compliance fixes root causes. Both must cross-communicate consistently. When they don’t align, friction, inefficiency, and risk increase. Real-World Red Flags Renee and Julie call out four common structural warning signs: 🚩 1. Customs buried too deep Under logistics, contracts, or sales without escalation authority. 🚩 2. Broker “owns” compliance Brokers file entries — they do not own your risk. 🚩 3. No executive sponsor A sponsor is not a cheerleader — it’s a leader who clears roadblocks and escalates risk appropriately. 🚩 4. Customs is not the budget holder If you don’t control funding, you don’t control strategy. The Big Takeaway There is no “perfect” structure. Centralized, decentralized, and matrix models can all work. But maturity shows up in: Clear decision rights Budget authority Executive sponsorship Alignment between operations and compliance Structure doesn’t eliminate risk. Misalignment creates it. This Episode’s FIO (Figure It Out) Take a hard look at your organization: Which structure are you operating in — centralized, decentralized, or matrix? What’s working well? Where are the structural gaps? Who holds the budget and escalation authority? Because you can’t fix what you haven’t identified. Future episodes in this series will focus on how to modernize or optimize each model — whether through small tweaks or major reorgs. Join the Conversation Where does Customs sit in your organization? And more importantly — is it positioned for influence or just paperwork? Let us know inside the Trade Geeks Community or connect with us on LinkedIn. Credits Hosts: Renee Chiuchiarelli Julie Parks Producer: Lalo Solorzano 🎧 Subscribe & Follow New Simply Trade Tips episodes every Tuesday. Presented by Global Training Center — providing education, consulting, and compliance resources for trade professionals worldwide. Listen & subscribe: YouTube Spotify Apple Podcasts

Host: Annik Sobing Guest: Kenneth G. Peters Published: February 2026 Length: ~20 minutes Presented by: Global Training Center GTM Software Prep: Don't Install Until You've Done These 3 Things First In this Simply Trade Roundup, Annik talks with Kenneth G. Peters, President at MIC US and Director of Commercial Operations in North America, about Global Trade Management (GTM) software—specifically, what trade teams must do before implementation to avoid creating “digital chaos.” Ken shares real talk from his ATCC presentation on data cleanup, process mapping, and testing, plus why “cleaning your data like you're hosting the in-laws” is now his signature advice. Shoutout to Alison for the killer slides.​ What You’ll Learn in This Episode Ken’s new grandpa status (the little guy is 7 months old—congrats!) and why it’s the “next step in life” that keeps him energized for trade tech.​ The #1 mistake companies make with GTM software Data cleanup first: Don’t dump junk into GTM. Scrub inactive vendors, obsolete parts, invalid HS codes (like 111111 or all zeros). Clean it like you're hosting the in-laws—no mess allowed. Why: GTM amplifies what you give it. Bad data in = faster mistakes out.​ Avoid the “Big Bang” implementation trap Don’t try to do everything at once (denied party screening + classification + FTA rules + solicitation). Start small: Classification (builds the foundation—parts, HS codes, values). Denied party screening (uses your vendor/part data). FTA analysis (relies on classification/HS from step 1). Why: Master data dependencies mean you build once and reuse everywhere.​ Processes over pixels GTM won’t fix broken workflows. Map your processes before going live. If your current setup is emailing Excel files between systems, you’re not automating—you’re digitizing chaos. True automation: ERP ↔ GTM via SFTP, APIs, XML—no human hands on keyboards. Reduces errors, speeds everything up.​ Who owns what after go‑live MIC US (GTM provider): Manages the software backend—reg updates, HS databases, platform maintenance. Your team: Owns the process (classification, entry creation, decision‑making). Someone still reviews outputs for accuracy. No “managed services” from MIC—GTM is a tool, not a full‑service outsource.​ Testing: where most implementations fail Allocate real time and resources to testing—don’t rush it. Test end‑to‑end: data flow, workflows, edge cases. Why: Skipped or rushed testing = live problems that cost more to fix later.​ “If your systems are emailing Excel files to each other, you're not automating” Ken’s golden rule: Hands‑off data flow (ERP → GTM) eliminates errors. Excel handoffs = manual errors waiting to happen.​ Key Takeaways Clean data first: Active parts, valid HS, no ghosts—GTM makes good data shine and bad data explode.​ Start small, build smart: Classification → screening → FTA, not “big bang everything.”​ Fix processes before pixels: GTM won’t save broken workflows; it speeds them up.​ Testing = non‑negotiable: Rushed testing = expensive live fixes.​ GTM is a force multiplier—if your foundation is solid.​ Credits Host: Annik Sobing Guest: Kenneth G. Peters, President, MIC US Producer: Annik Sobing  Listen & Subscribe Simply Trade main page: https://simplytrade.podbean.com​ Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/simply-trade/id1640329690​ Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/09m199JO6fuNumbcrHTkGq​ Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/8de7d7fa-38e0-41b2-bad3-b8a3c5dc4cda/simply-trade​ Connect with Simply Trade Podcast page: https://www.globaltrainingcenter.com/simply-trade-podcast​ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/simply-trade-podcast​ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@SimplyTradePod​ Join the Trade Geeks Community Trade Geeks (by Global Training Center): https://globaltrainingcenter.com/trade-geeks/  

Host: Cindy Allen Show: Simply Trade – Cindy’s Version Published: February 27, 2026 Length: ~15 minutes Presented by: Global Training Center All Too Well: One Week Post-IEEPA, Still Not Fine at All One week after the Supreme Court struck down IEEPA tariffs, Cindy Allen, CEO of TradeForce Multiplier, delivers the latest update through the lens of Taylor Swift’s “All Too Well.” She breaks down the lingering uncertainty—“I know it’s long gone and the magic’s not here no more… I might be okay, but I’m not fine at all”—and what importers, brokers, and service providers should do next amid shutdowns, pending bills, and shifting tariff authorities.​ What You’ll Learn in This Episode Legislative landscape Three new bills introduced on IEEPA refunds: two support refunds for importers; one opposes and ties refunds to consumers (challenging in practice). Other pending bills (eliminating first sale, non‑resident importer status, new licensing program) are unlikely to move soon. IEEPA refund bills could gain traction if courts rule against refunds—watch for Congress to act.​ DHS shutdown impacts Ongoing due to budget issues; most CBP personnel are working without pay (be kind!). Trade interactions limited as “non‑essential”: canceled meetings, no new conference appearances. TSA PreCheck spared (shutdown threat revoked); Global Entry inactive due to staffing.​ CBP updates and waits Still awaiting Section 232 valuation guidance for steel/aluminum/copper derivatives—current CBP direction conflicts with executive order language. Trade associations have jointly requested clarity; no response yet.​ Administration signals New trade deals now using Section 122 authority instead of IEEPA. Acceleration planned for remaining 232 investigations and new 301 actions—structured processes with timelines, public input, and notice (no more Friday night surprises).​ Why “All Too Well”? Cindy ties the week to Taylor Swift’s “All Too Well,” capturing trade’s emotional whiplash: IEEPA is “long gone,” but the “magic” of predictability isn’t back. Importers, attorneys, and consultants are swamped with “What now?” calls—Cindy’s attended 5+ webinars with no clear answers. The trade isn’t “fine”—we’re in uncharted territory.​ The Big Questions: If, How, When on IEEPA Refunds IF refunds happen: Supreme Court remanded to lower court, likely landing at Court of International Trade (CIT). Prevailing view: no legal basis to withhold refunds, but scope (“which refunds?”) is unclear.​ HOW to get refunds: Two paths debated: 1581(i) (equitable jurisdiction—broad refunds for all) vs. 1581(a)(denied protests only). Post-summary corrections rejected by CBP—don’t try now. FedEx filed CIT action to protect refund rights. Recommendation: talk to an attorney for tailored advice.​ WHEN to act: Government has 25 days for rehearing request (unlikely); ~7 days admin time; then CIT jurisdiction (~32 days total from Supreme Court). File protests now if entries liquidate soon to preserve rights (CIT may require it under 1581(a)). If no imminent liquidations, wait—process could take months or a year+. Pack patience; this is a long haul.​ Key Takeaways IEEPA tariffs are history, but uncertainty reigns—new authorities (Section 122, accelerated 232/301) fill the gap.​ Support CBP/TSA workers during shutdown—they’re on the job unpaid.​ Consult an attorney ASAP for refund strategy; don’t sleep on protest deadlines.​ No quick fixes ahead—trade pros need patience and planning.​ Credits Host: Cindy Allen Producer: Annik Sobing Listen & Subscribe Simply Trade main page: https://simplytrade.podbean.com​ Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/simply-trade/id1640329690​ Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/09m199JO6fuNumbcrHTkGq​ Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/8de7d7fa-38e0-41b2-bad3-b8a3c5dc4cda/simply-trade​ Connect with Simply Trade Podcast page: https://www.globaltrainingcenter.com/simply-trade-podcast​ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/simply-trade-podcast​ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@SimplyTradePod​ Join the Trade Geeks Community Trade Geeks (by Global Training Center): https://globaltrainingcenter.com/trade-geeks/

Hosts: Lalo Solorzano & Andy Shiles Episode Length: ~ 44 min. Published: February 25, 2026 Episode Summary The Supreme Court has ruled on the use of IEEPA tariffs — and the trade community immediately started asking the same question: Now what? In this episode of Simply Trade, Lalo and Andy break down what the SCOTUS decision really means (and just as importantly, what it does not mean). They walk through the operational, financial, and compliance implications for importers, including refund strategies, protests, PSC filings, and what role the Court of International Trade may still play. This is not a political conversation — it’s a practical one. If you’re an importer, broker, trade attorney, or compliance leader trying to understand next steps, this episode gives you the strategic roadmap. Key Discussion Points What the Supreme Court actually ruled on regarding IEEPA What this decision does not affect (Section 232, 301, etc.) Whether importers should file PSCs, protests, or wait The role of the Court of International Trade (CIT) Refund timing and cash flow implications The possibility of alternative tariff authorities (including Section 122) Why internal data analysis is critical right now How compliance programs can prepare for future shifts Why This Matters For companies that paid duties under IEEPA authority, this decision could mean: Significant refund opportunities Strategic filing decisions Litigation exposure Executive-level reporting requirements Reassessment of long-term sourcing strategy But acting too quickly — or without data — could create unnecessary risk. Lalo and Andy emphasize that now is the time for: Data gathering Executive briefings Controlled decision-making Clear documentation A strong compliance foundation Practical Takeaways Don’t assume automatic refunds — process matters. Evaluate PSC vs. protest options carefully. Monitor CIT developments closely. Keep leadership informed with quantified impact analysis. Use this moment to strengthen your compliance framework. Resources U.S. Supreme Court: Supreme Court Decision on IEEPA U.S. Court of International Trade: https://www.cit.uscourts.gov Global Training Center: https://www.globaltrainingcenter.com Trade Geeks Community: https://globaltrainingcenter.com/portal/ Credits 🎙️ Hosts: Lalo Solorzano Andy Shiles 🎬 Production & Media: Global Training Center 🎧 Podcast: Simply Trade Subscribe & Follow 🎧 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@simplytradepod?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast 🎧 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/09m199JO6fuNumbcrHTkGq?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast 🎧 Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/simply-trade/id1640329690?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast Connect With Us 🔹 Lalo Solorzano https://www.linkedin.com/in/lalosolorzano/ 🔹 Andy Shiles https://www.linkedin.com/in/andyshiles/ 🔹 Global Training Center LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/global-training-center?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast Want to Be on the Show? Have a perspective on trade developments, compliance strategy, or real-world implementation challenges? Reach out — we’d love to feature voices from across the industry.

Series 5 – Episode 6 Hosts: Renee Chiuchiarelli & Julie Parks (Hammer & Heels) Length: ~12 minutes Format: Simply Trade Tips Episode Summary In this final installment of the Trade & Tech series, Renee and Julie deliver what many listeners have been asking for: 👉 Who should we call when we’re ready to automate? This episode serves as a practical cheat sheet — a high-level recap of the key categories of trade technology and the types of providers operating in each space. From product and entity data to import/export execution, learning platforms, and audit analytics, Renee and Julie walk through where automation fits, what problems it solves, and what types of solutions companies are leveraging today. They also emphasize an important disclaimer: the trade tech space is evolving rapidly. New entrants are emerging, existing platforms are expanding capabilities, and buyers should always conduct current research before issuing an RFP. The goal of this episode isn’t endorsement — it’s orientation. Series Recap: The Big Picture Across this series, one theme remained constant: Trade is too complex to run on spreadsheets forever. Technology doesn’t replace trade professionals — it strengthens them. Clean data drives better decisions. Automation builds structure, execution, capability, and proof. Episode Breakdown Episode 1: The Foundation Trade programs often rely on tribal knowledge and heroics Technology introduces structure Data in → Decisions out → Proof stored Episode 2: Product & Entity Data Focus: Organizing trade requirements at the product and company level Categories discussed: Classification & denied party screening platforms End-to-end compliance tools with workflow and audit logs Supplier onboarding and traceability tools (including UFLPA and CTPAT support) Supply chain intelligence platforms Broker-enabled onboarding tools Key takeaway: If your product and supplier data isn’t clean, everything downstream — entries, audits, refunds — gets messy. Episode 3: Importing & Exporting Execution Focus: Running the day-to-day engine Areas covered: Entry filing & broker connectivity Document management & visibility Transportation Management Systems (TMS) Export controls & licensing workflows Leveraging broker and forwarder technology stacks Important reminder: Tariff exposure and compliance risks often start upstream — automation must support early decision-making, not just filing. Episode 4: Learning & Embedded Education Focus: Building capability Calendar training vs. real-time (inflow) learning Role-based, embedded, and trackable education LMS integration and audit defensibility Continuous reinforcement vs. one-time onboarding Learning isn’t a side activity — it’s infrastructure. Episode 5: Auditing & Analytics Focus: Proof and defensibility Automation supports: Classification consistency Valuation flags FTA claims validation PGA data checks Entry accuracy monitoring Tools often connect to: GTM platforms ERP systems Broker data feeds ACE data Business intelligence dashboards Bottom line: Audit tech helps companies identify overpayments, prevent penalties, and stay ready for CBP review. The Big Wrap If you remember nothing else from this series: Product & entity tech gives you structure. Import/export tech gives you execution. Learning tech gives you capability. Auditing tech gives you proof. Where Should You Start? Start where the pain is greatest: Too many manual screening hits? → Automate denied party screening Supplier questionnaire chaos? → Traceability tools Entry surprises or duty errors? → Execution platforms Constant fire drills? → Auditing & monitoring tools And don’t forget: Your customs broker or freight forwarder may already offer automation tools embedded in their services — often more cost-effective than standalone implementation. This Episode’s FIO (Figure It Out) Ask your broker or freight forwarder: 👉 What automation tools are already available to us? 👉 What data visibility can we access today? 👉 What are we not leveraging? Sometimes the first step isn’t buying new software — it’s using what you already have. Join the Conversation Which area of trade automation are you prioritizing in 2026? Structure? Execution? Capability? Proof? Join us inside the Trade Geeks Community and let us know where you’re starting. Credits Hosts: Renee Chiuchiarelli Julie Parks Producer: Lalo Solorzano 🎧 Subscribe & Follow New Simply Trade Tips episodes every Tuesday. Presented by: Global Training Center — education, consulting, workshops & compliance resources for trade professionals. Connect With Us Simply Trade Podcast on LinkedIn Global Training Center on LinkedIn YouTube Spotify Apple Podcasts Trade Geeks Community 💬 Don’t forget to rate, review & share with your fellow trade geeks!

Host: Annik Sobing Guest: Scott Sorenson (CEO at CITTA Brokerage Company)  Published: February 2026 Length: ~25–30 minutes Presented by: Global Training Center IEEPA Tariffs Struck Down: What Importers Can Do Now (and What They Still Can’t) In this Simply Trade Roundup, Annik talks with Scott Sorenson, CEO of SIDA Brokerage, about the Supreme Court’s decision that the president exceeded his authority by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose broad, revenue‑raising tariffs—and what that actually means for importers on the ground. They unpack which tariffs are impacted, what stays in place, key timing details, the refund question, and how duty drawback fits into all of it.​ What You’ll Learn in This Episode What the Supreme Court actually decided Why the Court held that tariffs are fundamentally a tax, and that power belongs to Congress unless clearly delegated by statute. How the ruling targets IEEPA‑based tariffs, not all tariffs.​ Which tariffs are affected—and which are not Impacted: The 2025 “drug trafficking” (fentanyl) tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China (25% under an emergency declaration). The later “reciprocal” tariffs, also imposed under IEEPA, with rates starting at 10% and going higher based on perceived trade imbalances. Not impacted: Section 232 (steel/aluminum) and Section 301 tariffs introduced in Trump’s first term (2018–2019), which remain in place and were not struck down.​ Key timing: when IEEPA tariffs actually stop CBP will stop collecting IEEPA tariffs on goods entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after 12:00 a.m. Eastern, February 24, 2026. Goods entering or withdrawn before that time (including February 23) are still being charged IEEPA duties, despite the Court’s ruling—creating a frustrating “limbo” day for importers.​ The big unknown: refunds on IEEPA duties It is still unclear whether, and how, importers can obtain refunds of IEEPA tariffs already paid. Many trade attorneys are advising against simple protests and instead suggesting participation in, or filing of, Court of International Trade lawsuits as the likely avenue—though eligibility and timelines remain unsettled. Open questions include whether only parties that joined lawsuits before the Supreme Court decision will qualify, and how any refund mechanism would practically work given estimates of over 100 billion dollars collected.​ New 15% global tariff under Section 122 Following the ruling, President Trump announced a 10% global tariff, then quickly raised it to 15%, on top of all existing non‑IEEPA tariffs. This measure relies on Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act, which allows the president to impose tariffs for up to 150 days. Scott expects this to serve as a bridge while the administration seeks a longer‑term, more permanent tariff framework—possibly through new legislation or other authorities.​ Duty drawback: where it fits and where it doesn’t Duty drawback basics: refunds of duties/tariffs on imported goods that are later exported or destroyed, a program that has existed for nearly 250 years and has become more critical as tariffs have risen. Inconsistencies across programs: Fentanyl/“drug trafficking” IEEPA tariffs were explicitly ineligible for drawback. Reciprocal IEEPA tariffs were eligible. Section 232 tariffs are not eligible; Section 301 tariffs are. For the new Section 122 15% tariffs, eligibility will likely depend on whether they are explicitly excluded in future guidance. Historically, exclusions have been clearly spelled out, so silence may mean eligibility.​ Drawback vs. potential IEEPA refunds Drawback is separate from any Supreme Court‑related IEEPA refund mechanism. Importers that already claimed drawback on IEEPA‑burdened goods and later receive a broader IEEPA refund would need to avoid double dipping—likely refunding drawback amounts if they also get a full tariff refund via litigation/settlement. For importers that don’t export, drawback isn’t an option, so any recovery depends entirely on whatever refund path, if any, emerges for IEEPA tariffs.​ Should you start or expand a drawback program now? Scott’s answer: yes, especially if you export. Reasons: Tariff volatility is likely to continue, and the administration has signaled interest in more and longer‑term tariffs. Drawback is one of the few mitigation tools that works retroactively, not just going forward. Setting up a drawback program and getting CBP approval takes time; starting now puts you closer to the front of the line for future refunds.​ Key Takeaways The Supreme Court has ended IEEPA’s use as a broad revenue tool, but IEEPA tariffs are only stopping prospectively as of February 24, and refund mechanics for the past year remain unresolved.​ Section 232 and 301 tariffs are untouched and remain fully in force; the tariff landscape is far from “back to normal.”​ A new 15% Section 122 global tariff is already in play and may evolve into something more permanent, so importers should plan for continued elevated duty costs.​ Duty drawback remains a powerful, underused mitigation strategy—especially given the uncertainty around IEEPA refunds and future tariffs.​ Presented by: Global Training Center​ Listen & Subscribe Simply Trade main page: https://simplytrade.podbean.com​ Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/simply-trade/id1640329690​ Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/09m199JO6fuNumbcrHTkGq​ Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/8de7d7fa-38e0-41b2-bad3-b8a3c5dc4cda/simply-trade​ Connect with Simply Trade Podcast page: https://www.globaltrainingcenter.com/simply-trade-podcast​ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/simply-trade-podcast​ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@SimplyTradePod​ Join the Trade Geeks Community Trade Geeks (by Global Training Center): https://globaltrainingcenter.com/trade-geeks/

Host: Cindy Allen Published: February 20, 2026 Length: ~18 minutes Presented by: Global Training Center Summary “Tariff Friday” may go down as one of the most pivotal days in recent trade history. In this episode of Simply Trade: Cindy’s Version, Cindy Allen breaks down the U.S. Supreme Court’s 6–3 decision ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. The Court found that the authority to levy taxes and tariffs belongs to Congress, and that the term “regulate” under IEEPA does not include the power to raise revenue. Inspired by Taylor Swift’s Opalite, Cindy walks through what the ruling actually says, what it does not say, and what importers and customs brokers should do right now while awaiting further instruction from the Court of International Trade (CIT) and CBP. The decision may have brought sunlight—but operational clarity will take time. This Week in Trade (Before the Ruling) • Awaiting details on Taiwan 15% MFN (or higher) structure • Pending clarification on India IEEPA reciprocal adjustment (25% to 18%) • Indonesia agreement announced with 19% tariff and textile tariff-rate quota • No movement on elimination of First Sale • No further action on ending IEEPA on Canada • U.S. manufacturing indicators down; stock market up The Supreme Court Decision The Supreme Court issued a 6–3 opinion finding that IEEPA does not grant authority to impose tariffs. Key findings: • IEEPA contains nine enumerated action verbs — none include taxing or raising revenue • Congress alone holds the constitutional authority to levy tariffs • Specific delegated authorities (Sections 301, 232, 122, 338) include limitations and procedural controls • Because Congress created these specific tariff authorities, a broad IEEPA tariff authority cannot be implied • During peacetime, the President does not have independent tariff authority The Court remanded the case back to the lower court — likely the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) — which must now issue implementation instructions. What We Still Don’t Know • When the CIT will issue instructions • When (or if) CBP will suspend IEEPA tariff collection • Whether refunds will be automatic or require action • Whether de minimis is affected • Whether related trade agreements tied to IEEPA remain intact • Whether the administration pivots to Section 122 or 338 authorities What Importers Should Do Right Now Cindy’s recommendation is clear: Continue paying duties until formal CBP guidance is issued. Why? • Duties were in effect at time of entry • Monthly statement entries could otherwise be considered unpaid • CBP systems still contain IEEPA tariff numbers and edit checks • Programming updates will take time Stopping payment prematurely could create compliance risk. Refunds, when issued, will likely require formal action — potentially protests, post-summary corrections, or other ACE updates. Given the volume of entries involved, automatic refunds appear unlikely. Key Takeaways • IEEPA tariffs have been ruled unlawful for revenue purposes • Congress retains sole tariff authority • Operational changes will depend on CIT and CBP implementation • Continue paying duties until official guidance is issued • Refund mechanics remain unclear • Trade professionals must remain disciplined and patient Resources & Mentions • Global Training Center • TradeForce Multiplier • U.S. Supreme Court Opinion (24-1287) Credits Host: • Cindy Allen – LinkedIn • TradeForce Multiplier Producer: • Lalo Solorzano – LinkedIn Subscribe & Follow New episodes every Friday. Presented by Global Training Center — providing education, consulting, workshops, and compliance resources for trade professionals. • Simply Trade Podcast on LinkedIn • Global Training Center on LinkedIn • YouTube • Spotify • Apple Podcasts • Trade Geeks Community

Episode: #444 Hosts: Andy Shiles & Lalo Solorzano Guest: Kristi App, Chief Commercial Officer, Port of New Orleans Published: February 2026 Length: ~35 minutes Presented by: Global Training Center 🏗️ Episode Summary This week, Andy and Lalo shift gears from tariff talk and policy debates to something just as critical — port infrastructure and cargo flow. They sit down with Kristi App, newly appointed Chief Commercial Officer for the Port of New Orleans, to discuss her transition from a multi-generational family customs brokerage to one of the most important trade gateways in the United States. From Mardi Gras humor to multimodal logistics strategy, this conversation dives into: The economic impact of the Mississippi River complex Why the Port of New Orleans is uniquely positioned with all six Class I rail connections The realities of competing with Brazil and Argentina in agricultural exports Panama Canal water levels and their impact on Gulf trade Infrastructure challenges (including bridge air draft restrictions) And the future $2 billion container terminal expansion in Violet, Louisiana Kristi brings a rare perspective — someone who has worked export ops, import brokerage, business development, and trade advocacy — now sitting on the port side making strategic infrastructure decisions that shape supply chains. If you work in logistics, brokerage, importing, exporting, or trade policy, this episode gives you a behind-the-scenes look at how ports think — and how that thinking impacts your freight. 🚢 Key Takeaways The Lower Mississippi River complex feeds, fuels, and powers the world — over 60% of U.S. grain exports flow through it. The Port of New Orleans is the only deep-draft U.S. port connected to all six Class I railroads. Freight always has a choice — ports must remain competitive and multimodal. Brazil and Argentina have become serious competitors in global ag exports. The Panama Canal’s stabilization benefits the entire Gulf ecosystem. The Crescent City Connection bridge creates air draft limitations for larger container vessels. A new $2 billion container terminal (2 million TEU capacity) is in final permitting stages — a generational infrastructure project. Retain, repatriate, and grow cargo: the port’s commercial strategy in three words. 🌎 Why This Matters to Trade Professionals Kristi emphasizes something important: Ports are the nexus of trade — but they only work if infrastructure investments match market demand. For brokers and importers/exporters, that means: More routing options Multimodal flexibility (rail + river + interstate) Competitive Gulf Coast alternatives Future-ready capacity for larger vessels This episode is a reminder that policy debates are one thing — but infrastructure is what actually moves goods. 📍 Industry Events Mentioned TPM Conference – Long Beach Journal of Commerce Breakbulk Conference – New Orleans (April 20–22) 🔗 Resources & Mentions Kristi App – LinkedIn Port of New Orleans National Customs Brokers & Forwarders Association of America (NCBFAA) Journal of Commerce U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Mississippi River Channel Management 🎧 Credits Hosts: Andy Shiles Lalo Solorzano Guest: Kristi App, Chief Commercial Officer, Port of New Orleans Produced & Presented by: Global Training Center 📢 Subscribe & Follow Stay connected with the Simply Trade community: LinkedIn – Andy Shiles LinkedIn – Lalo Solorzano LinkedIn – Global Training Center YouTube – Simply Trade Podcast Spotify – https://open.spotify.com/show/09m199JO6fuNumbcrHTkGq?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast Apple Podcasts – https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/simply-trade/id1640329690?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast Trade Geeks Community – https://globaltrainingcenter.com/portal/?utm_source=SimplyTradePodcast

Series 5 – Episode 5 Hosts: Renee Chiuchiarelli & Julie Parks (Hammer & Heels) Length: ~12 minutes Format: Simply Trade Tips Episode Summary In this episode of Simply Trade Tips, Renee and Julie tackle a topic that doesn’t always get the spotlight it deserves: learning. With trade rules shifting constantly — tariff changes, executive orders, enforcement priorities, and regulatory updates — relying on static training or tribal knowledge simply isn’t enough. Traditional “calendar training” (scheduled webinars, annual sessions, policy rollouts) still has value, but it’s disconnected from daily operations. The big idea? Learning must move from a side activity to core infrastructure. Renee and Julie introduce the concept of “inflow learning” — contextual, real-time training embedded directly into workflow systems. Instead of pausing work to learn, professionals access guidance at the exact moment they need it. This shift makes compliance more resilient, scalable, and defensible in today’s enforcement environment. Key Topics Covered Why static training creates operational gaps The difference between: Calendar training (scheduled sessions) Inflow training (embedded, contextual learning) How automation can trigger learning during: Origin determinations Classification decisions Filing processes Audit reviews Role-based learning paths for importers, exporters, and compliance teams Micro-learning triggered by real-time errors Using AI to generate contextual training from existing materials Why regulators expect documented training as part of “reasonable care” How embedded learning reduces repeat errors and improves confidence Why knowledge in trade is no longer theoretical — it impacts entries, exports, and balance sheets immediately Key Takeaways Learning must be integrated into daily workflow, not isolated from it Automation supports better decision-making without replacing expertise Real-time learning reduces repeat errors and strengthens defensibility Training documentation can become powerful evidence during audits Trade compliance in today’s environment requires resilience, not just proactivity This Episode’s FIO (Figure It Out) Take a moment to evaluate your current training model: Is your team relying mostly on scheduled sessions? Do your systems provide contextual, real-time learning prompts? Have you asked your software provider about embedded guidance tools? Have you explored advanced or hybrid learning models that combine live instruction with digital access? Dip your toe in. Explore what’s available. Demand better integration between learning and operations. Join the Conversation How is your organization approaching trade training in 2026? Are you relying on memory — or building infrastructure? Join us inside the Trade Geeks Community and share what you’re doing to make learning more resilient. Credits Hosts: Renee Chiuchiarelli Julie Parks Producer: Lalo Solorzano 🎧 Subscribe & Follow New Simply Trade Tips episodes every Tuesday. Presented by: Global Training Center — education, consulting, workshops & compliance resources for trade professionals. Connect With Us Simply Trade Podcast on LinkedIn Global Training Center on LinkedIn YouTube Spotify Apple Podcasts Trade Geeks Community 💬 Don’t forget to rate, review & share with your fellow trade geeks! Want to Be on the Show or Have Topic Suggestions? 📧 SimplyTrade@GlobalTrainingCenter.com 🐦 Twitter/X: @SimplyTradePod