Claim OwnershipSocial Justice - A Conversation
Subscribed: 0Played: 0
Subscribe
© 2025 Charles Stanton
Description
Social Justice - A Conversation
84 Episodes
Reverse
Professor Charles Stanton and third-year law student Blanca Peña discuss the lack of cooperation among U.S. government branches, particularly affecting food stamp benefits and healthcare. They highlight the inertia of Congress, leading to potential government shutdowns and the defunding of Medicaid and Obamacare. Blanca criticizes the government's focus on individualism over community support, citing the treatment of the homeless and the impact of federal benefit cuts on millions, including children and underpaid workers. They also discuss the societal prejudice against the poor and the need for collective action to address these issues.
Professor Charles Stanton and third-year law student Blanca Peña discuss the symbolic destruction of the East Wing of the White House, criticizing the lack of consultation with historians and the public. They highlight the broader implications of the administration's actions, including the government shutdown and the failure of Congress to act independently. The conversation touches on the moral and societal issues, such as the treatment of immigrants, the impact of propaganda, and the need for empathy and critical thinking. They emphasize the importance of historical education to prevent repeating past mistakes and call for a more united and informed society.
Professor Charles Stanton and third-year law student Blanca Pena discuss the Catholic Church's failure to address past abuse cases, drawing parallels to the Jeffrey Epstein case. They criticize the justice system's ineffectiveness and the Supreme Court's short-sighted decisions. Blanca highlights the hypocrisy in political figures' support for free speech. They discuss the impact of government shutdowns on healthcare and employment, and the wealth disparity, citing Elon Musk's potential to become the first trillionaire. They emphasize the need for collective resistance and hope, urging listeners to fight for justice and equality.
Professors Charles Stanton and Blanca Pena discussed the delayed swearing-in of Azalea Gravarvala, the daughter of a former congressman, amidst allegations of efforts to prevent the release of Jeffrey Epstein's files, which she holds the critical 218th vote. They highlighted the broader issues of political corruption, moral decline, and systemic failures in justice. Comparisons were drawn to historic delays in Supreme Court justice appointments and recent scandals involving powerful individuals. The conversation underscored the necessity of societal introspection and reform, particularly regarding child exploitation, racial equity, and gender equality, while expressing hope for a transformative moment if the truth emerges.
Professor Charles Stanton and third-year law student Blanca Pena discuss the impact of the government shutdown, highlighting the Republican Party's desire to cut healthcare programs like Obamacare and Medicaid. They note the disproportionate impact on minority communities, particularly WIC, and the broader agenda to eliminate agencies. Blanca criticizes the administration's divisive tactics and the misinformation spread about the shutdown. They also discuss the devaluation of minority communities, the weaponization of religion, and the importance of love, dialogue, and faith in addressing societal issues. The conversation emphasizes the need for collective action and principled stand to overcome current challenges.
Professor Charles Stanton and Blanca Pena discuss the erosion of the legal system and the independence of prosecutors under the current administration. They highlight the dismissal of qualified prosecutors like James Comey and the appointment of unqualified individuals, such as a prosecutor specializing in insurance law. They also touch on the broader implications of the administration's actions, including the potential defunding of Obamacare, the impact on healthcare, and the moral implications of immigration policies. The conversation emphasizes the need for unity and the erosion of human rights and due process, particularly for immigrants.
Professor Charles Stanton and third-year law student Blanca Pena discuss the implications of Charlie Kirk's death and the erosion of the First Amendment. They highlight the irony of calls for speech regulation after Kirk's pro-free speech stance. They also address the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, criticizing the lack of congressional action and the failure to release bank records. Blanca emphasizes the systemic issues in handling abuse cases, particularly the high standards for victims and the prevalence of abuse in universities. They call for a return to core values, ethical standards, and a more empathetic society.
Professor Charles Stanton and third-year law student Blanca Pena discuss social justice issues, focusing on the inadequacies of the current U.S. administration. They criticize the appointment of unqualified individuals like Health Secretary RFK, citing his lack of knowledge and experience. They express concern over the country's health, particularly with the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. The conversation also touches on the Jeffrey Epstein case, highlighting the failure of the justice system to provide victims with justice. They emphasize the systemic flaws in the U.S. legal and political systems, including the Supreme Court's lack of ethics and the President's misuse of legal processes.
Charles Stanton and Kira Kramer discuss the state of social justice in the U.S., highlighting issues of civic engagement, economic inequality, and the impact of the current administration. Kira notes the overworked and stressed population, lack of empathy, and the shift towards competitive authoritarianism. Charles emphasizes the breakdown of institutions, the racial and gender divisions, and the need for redistribution of wealth and corporate responsibility. Both stress the importance of empathy, activism, and the role of education in addressing these issues. Kira plans to pursue a career in law to advocate for social justice, while Charles commends her contributions and looks forward to her future impact.
Charles Stanton and Kira Kramer discuss the lack of due process in immigrant removals, highlighting a case where a man was deported to El Salvador without any process. They express concern over the shift towards competitive authoritarianism, citing a survey of 500 political scientists. The conversation touches on the importance of affirmative action, particularly at diverse universities like UNLV, and the disparities in coaching opportunities in sports. They also discuss the economic impact of the current administration's policies, the potential for civil unrest, and the importance of midterm elections for political mobilization.
Charles Stanton and Kira Kramer discuss the threat to educational institutions and the erosion of legal principles. They highlight the impact of government pressure on universities, citing the University of Michigan's abandonment of DEI programs. Stanton criticizes law firms for succumbing to government dictates on case selection, undermining social justice efforts. Kramer emphasizes the need for collective action among universities and law firms. They discuss the economic instability caused by inconsistent tariff policies and the potential harm of the Save Act, which could disenfranchise millions. Both stress the importance of community support and vigilance against democratic erosion.
Charles Stanton and Kira Kramer discuss the erosion of U.S. cybersecurity due to the removal of experienced personnel, which they argue poses a significant threat to national security. They also critique the administration's tariff policies, predicting they will harm the car industry and increase production costs by 20-40%. Kramer highlights the exploitation of undocumented workers in agriculture, noting the potential collapse of small farms and the monopoly of mega farms. They criticize the lack of leadership in Congress, particularly from Democratic leaders, and call for greater citizen involvement in protests and activism.
Charles Stanton and Kira Kramer discuss the role of law firms in upholding free speech and challenging the Trump administration's actions. They highlight the subservience of firms like Paul Weiss and praise those, like WilmerHale, standing against the administration. Kira emphasizes the importance of mobilizing for midterm elections and opposing the Silencing Americans Act (HR 22), which could disenfranchise millions. They also address the administration's attempts to undermine diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and the need for collective legal action. The conversation concludes with a call to action for citizens to engage in peaceful protests and economic resistance.
Professor Charles Stanton and Kira Kramer discuss the Trump administration's impact on social justice, highlighting cuts to the Veterans Administration, which now forces therapists to conduct sessions in large, open rooms, compromising patient privacy. They also criticize the elimination of legal representation for migrant children and cuts to education and Medicaid, particularly affecting states that supported the president. The conversation touches on the broader societal issues of individualism, lack of government accountability, and the need for informed citizens to engage politically. They emphasize the importance of diverse news sources and civic engagement to counteract these challenges.
Charles Stanton and Kira Kramer discuss the fear and retribution in Congress, with members hiring security due to threats. They criticize the Democrats' complacent response to Trump's actions, highlighting a lack of leadership and hypocrisy. They note Trump's loyalty oaths, cuts to government agencies like the VA and FAA, and the potential dangers of these actions. Kira mentions the firing of GSA employees in Nevada, affecting federal buildings. They discuss the impact of Trump's trade wars, rising costs, and the potential for international sanctions. They conclude by urging listeners to engage and stay informed.
Charles Stanton and Kira Kramer discuss the diplomatic breach of the meeting between Presidents Zelensky and Trump on February 28, 2025, criticizing the lack of protocol and the impact on NATO's confidence. They highlight Trump's alignment with dictators and his demoralizing impact on U.S. foreign policy. Kramer notes the lack of a flu vaccine protocol and the potential dangers to older voters. They discuss the broader negative effects of Trump's policies, including tariffs, civil service removal, and the Supreme Court's decisions. Kramer emphasizes the importance of community mobilization through groups like Indivisible and local initiatives to counteract these issues.
Charles Stanton and Kira Kramer discuss the U.S.'s shifting foreign policy under President Trump, particularly regarding Ukraine and Venezuela. They criticize Trump's alignment with Russia and China at the UN, and his support for dictators like Maduro. The conversation highlights the erosion of U.S. democracy, the enabling of dictatorships, and the potential for a kingly role for Trump. They emphasize the need for impeachment and active public engagement to restore democratic principles. The discussion also touches on the impact of Trump's policies on international relations, the military, and the Supreme Court's role in upholding the law.
Professor Charles Stanton and Kira Kramer discuss the challenges posed by the Trump administration's executive orders, which have been deemed insufficient or illegal by courts but face non-compliance from defendants. They highlight the potential threat to democracy and the rule of law, emphasizing the need for Congress and the public to act. Kramer links the current situation to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, noting the $4 trillion in tax benefits expiring and the administration's efforts to defund federal programs to fund tax breaks for the wealthy. They stress the importance of public education, community involvement, and pressure on elected officials to protect rights and prevent further erosion of democratic institutions.
Charles Stanton and Kira Kramer discuss the erosion of social justice and democratic principles in the U.S. They critique the President's attempts to end birthright citizenship and his uninformed plan for Gaza, highlighting the Republican Party's complicity. Kramer points out historical U.S. actions in the Middle East and the current exploitation of Palestinian resources. They discuss the lack of moral clarity and leadership in both major parties, the threat to federal workers' jobs, and the erosion of public health resources. Kramer emphasizes the importance of supporting organizations advocating for reproductive rights and public health. They conclude with a call to action to preserve democracy.
Comments
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
United States