Talking D&T

A short introduction for Series 2 and a catch up about the 4th edition of the book Learning to Teach Design and Technology in Secondary Schools.Mentioned in the episode:Design and Technology Education: An International JournalMentoring Design and Technology Teachers in the Secondary SchoolSupport the show (https://ko-fi.com/alisonhardy)

Welcome to the first episode of the first series of the Talking D&T podcast!In this episode I talk about the outline for the 4th edition of the book 'Learning to Teach Design and Technology in the Secondary School'. I also mention:David Layton's seminal work on values and design and technologyTranscript (pdf)More about the Learning to Teach D&T in the Secondary School book:Previously edited by Dr Gwyneth-Owen-Jackson, the 4th edition is due for publication in 2020 and is edited by Dr Alison Hardy. With new and updated chapters, this book will be an essential companion for new and established D&T teachers.Learning to Teach Design and Technology in the Secondary School(3rd edition edited by Dr Gwyneth Owen-Jackson)Support the show (https://ko-fi.com/alisonhardy)

This interview is with Rebecca Topps, who teaches D&T at St George's Academy in Sleaford. Rebecca is writing a new chapter 'Transitions from D&T post-16'.More about Rebecca:Trustee for the Design and Technology AssociationMore about the Learning to Teach D&T in the Secondary School book:This edition is about a chapter in the forthcoming 4th edition of the well-known book Learning to Teach D&T in Secondary School. Previously edited by Dr Gwyneth-Owen-Jackson, the 4th edition is due for publication in 2020 and is edited by Dr Alison Hardy. With new and updated chapters, this book will be an essential companion for new and established D&T teachers.Learning to Teach Design and Technology in the Secondary School (3rd edition edited by Dr Gwyneth Owen-Jackson)Support the show (https://ko-fi.com/alisonhardy)

Dr Marion Rutland is a world leading expert in food technology and D&T education. She led design and technology initial teacher education at the University of Roehampton and is currently editing a book about food education for Springer.More about Dr Marion Rutland:On ResearchGateOn Springer:Food in the School Curriculum: A Discussion of Alternative ApproachesFood technology on the school curriculum in England: Is it a curriculum for the twenty-first century?Perceptions of Primary Design and TechnologyMore about the Learning to Teach D&T in the Secondary School book:This edition is about a chapter in the forthcoming 4th edition of the well-known book Learning to Teach D&T in Secondary School. Previously edited by Dr Gwyneth-Owen-Jackson, the 4th edition is due for publication in 2020 and is edited by Dr Alison Hardy. With new and updated chapters, this book will be an essential companion for new and established D&T teachers.Learning to Teach Design and Technology in the Secondary School (3rd edition edited by Dr Gwyneth Owen-Jackson)Support the show (https://ko-fi.com/alisonhardy)

Dr Deborah Winn is Head of D&T at Neale-Wade Academy in Cambridgeshire. Debi is updating the chapter 'Developing links with other subjects'.More about Debi:PhD Thesis: CAD and creativity at Key Stage 3 : towards a new pedagogyAt Neale-Wade Academy More about the Learning to Teach D&T in the Secondary School book:This edition is about a chapter in the forthcoming 4th edition of the well-known book Learning to Teach D&T in Secondary School. Previously edited by Dr Gwyneth-Owen-Jackson, the 4th edition is due for publication in 2020 and is edited by Dr Alison Hardy. With new and updated chapters, this book will be an essential companion for new and established D&T teachers.Learning to Teach Design and Technology in the Secondary School (3rd edition edited by Dr Gwyneth Owen-Jackson)Support the show (https://ko-fi.com/alisonhardy)

Matt McLain is Head of Secondary Programmes at Liverpool John Moores University. He is writing a 'newish' chapter for the 4th edition of the Learning to Teach D&T book; its an amalgamation of sections from 3 chapters in the 3rd edition, with some additional focus using Matt's research about demonstrations and other signature pedagogies.Transcript (pdf)More about Matt McLain:On ResearchGateOn TwitterAt Liverpool John Moores UniversityMore about the Learning to Teach D&T in the Secondary School book:This edition is about a chapter in the forthcoming 4th edition of the well-known book Learning to Teach D&T in Secondary School. Previously edited by Dr Gwyneth-Owen-Jackson, the 4th edition is due for publication in 2020 and is edited by Dr Alison Hardy. With new and updated chapters, this book will be an essential companion for new and established D&T teachers.Learning to Teach Design and Technology in the Secondary School (3rd edition edited by Dr Gwyneth Owen-Jackson)Support the show (https://ko-fi.com/alisonhardy)

This interview is with Suzanne Norris, who teaches D&T at Arnold Hill School in Nottingham. Suzanne is updating the chapter 'Assessing design and technology'.More about Suzanne:On Twitter Arnold Hill AcademyMore about the Learning to Teach D&T in the Secondary School book:This edition is about a chapter in the forthcoming 4th edition of the well-known book Learning to Teach D&T in Secondary School. Previously edited by Dr Gwyneth-Owen-Jackson, the 4th edition is due for publication in 2020 and is edited by Dr Alison Hardy. With new and updated chapters, this book will be an essential companion for new and established D&T teachers.Learning to Teach Design and Technology in the Secondary School (3rd edition edited by Dr Gwyneth Owen-Jackson)Support the show (https://ko-fi.com/alisonhardy)

In this episode, I interview  David Spendlove, a professor at the University of Manchester, about his radical thinking on design and technology education. Spendlove reintroduces his concept of "Design and Technology 2.0," which aims to create a new conceptual space for rethinking the subject without the baggage of its current form.David argues that the current model of D&T education, driven by materialistic outcomes and consumerist ideologies, may be doing more harm than good in today's context of sustainability and climate change concerns. He suggests that D&T education should move away from its focus on product creation and instead empower students to question assumptions and engage with the complexity of values involved in design decisions.The discussion delves into the political nature of D&T education, its historical context, and the challenges it faces in the current educational landscape. David emphasises the need for a critical examination of the subject's underlying ideologies and the importance of considering an "Earth-centred" approach rather than just focusing on human needs and wants.The podcast concludes with thoughts on the future of D&T education, the role of academia in provoking new ideas, and the necessity of creating space for teachers to rethink the subject. David and I highlight the potential for D&T to be a powerful and transformative subject on the curriculum if it can evolve to address the pressing issues of our time.(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)Links to things mentioned in the show are  only available to subscribers. Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. Support the showIf you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Subscriber-only episodeIn this episode of Talking D&T, I dive into the aims of the Design and Technology National Curriculum in England. I discuss the four main aims as they are currently written, analyzing what each one entails and how they contribute to the overall purpose of the subject. I explore the first aim, which focuses on developing creative, technical, and practical expertise to participate in a technological world. The second aim is about building a repertoire of knowledge, understanding, and skills to design and make high-quality prototypes and products. I question the wording and phrasing of this aim, pondering if it could be streamlined for clarity. The third aim revolves around critiquing, evaluating, and testing ideas, products, and the work of others. I highlight the importance of distinguishing between critiquing one's own work versus the work of peers or professionals. Lastly, I touch on the fourth aim concerning nutrition and cooking.Throughout the episode, I emphasize the significance of having clear aims to guide lesson planning and measure the success of the subject. I argue that well-defined aims provide a cohesive big picture and prevent the subject content from feeling disjointed.While I generally agree with the aims, I point out some issues with their phrasing and offer insights on how teachers and curriculum planners can interpret and apply them effectively in the classroom. I hope this episode helps listeners better understand the intentions behind the Design and Technology curriculum.(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

This week’s episode is part of the Shaping D&T series, running from April to August 2024, where i interview a variety of people and discuss the current state and future of design and technology (D&T) education. This week it’s just me exploring the current   national curriculum for D&T in England, which has undergone several iterations, with the current version established in 2013-2014, making it the longest-standing iteration. The curriculum’s development involved expert review, led by Tim Oates, with a particular emphasis on aligning it with educational philosophies of figures like ED Hirsch and Daniel Willingham. However, the lack of a clear epistemology for D&T led to debates and criticisms, resulting in a revised curriculum that lacks external consultation. This has caused confusion and dissatisfaction within the D&T community.The curriculum aims to develop students’ creative, technical, and practical expertise, preparing them for an increasingly technological world. However, concerns arise regarding the integration of cooking and nutrition, which was previously embedded in D&T but now exists as a separate entity, causing confusion and diluting the subject’s integrity. Despite flaws, the curriculum provides a foundation for teaching and learning, with opportunities for evolution rather than dramatic overhaul. Future episodes will explore various perspectives on the curriculum and propose potential changes to address its shortcomings.Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. Support the showIf you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Subscriber-only episodeIn this episode of Talking D&T, I delve into the historical context and the reasons behind my decision to start the "Shaping Design and Technology Education" series. I reflect on the conversations and committees formed to discuss the state and future of D&T education in England, drawing parallels to the development of the national curriculum in 1990 and 2013. I express my concerns about the representation and balance of stakeholders in these committees, emphasizing the importance of power, legitimacy, and urgency in shaping the curriculum.I also discuss my contribution to a Festschrift in honor of Professor Mark De Vries, where I propose a new approach to developing the D&T curriculum. Instead of writing a new curriculum, I suggest a framework for evaluating proposed changes and identifying the appropriate stakeholder group. This framework consists of seven criteria, including the subject's epistemology, aims, inclusivity, values, real-world relevance, and feasibility across educational settings.Throughout the episode, I emphasize the need to view the development of the D&T curriculum as a design project, with each iteration being a resolution relevant to its time. I also highlight the importance of involving teachers at the micro-level, as they have the greatest power, legitimacy, and urgency in delivering the curriculum.Mentioned in this episodeDocuments from the 1990s government directive on the D&T curriculumBob McCormick's paper on designing the D&T curriculum by committee The 2013 D&T curriculum - the first versionAbstract of Alison Hardy's book chapter for the Festschrift in honor of Professor Mark De VriesInformation about the "Redesigning D&T" projectCiaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this introductory episode of the second series of my Talking D&T podcast for 2024, I discuss the focus of the upcoming series on shaping design and technology education in England. The series, running from April to August 2024, will feature international speakers sharing their perspectives on the subject in their respective countries.I explain the catalysts behind the series, including the decline in the number of pupils studying GCSE design and technology and proposals for transforming the curriculum. I have been attending various national meetings about the subject's current state and future development, hosted by organizations such as the Design Council. My podcast aims to bring these conversations to a wider audience and engage them in the discussion.I have divided the series into three parts, focusing on design and technology's current status in England, what people think about this, and what is being done to address the issues. I have invited a diverse range of guests, including representatives from exam boards, subject associations, and international voices. I hope that listeners will find the series engaging and encourage them to get involved in the conversation by sharing their ideas and opinions. The first public episode will be released on April 16th, 2024, with a subscription-only episode available on April 11th for teachers and other subscribers to prompt further thinking based on the context of shaping design and technology education.Mentioned in the episodeDesign Council: An independent charity and the government's advisor on design. Matilda Agace will discuss the organisation's role in shaping D&T education.Design and Technology Association, the only professional association for D&T education in the UK, actively involved in conversations about the subject's future.Crafts Council: The national charity for craft in the UK. Nikki Dewar will discuss their perspective on D&T education and the role of craft.Pearson's proposal, put forward by this education company, has served as a catalyst for current conversations and meetings surrounding the future of D&T education in England.Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. Support the showIf you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Subscriber-only episodeIn this follow-up episode to my conversation with Phil Jones about Remke's paper on intrinsic motivation, I delve deeper into the concepts of motivation and expectancy, drawing from my doctoral research and my chapter in the "Learning to Teach Design and Technology" book. I explore the distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, emphasising that intrinsic motivation comes from within the pupils, such as the satisfaction of mastering complex tasks or learning something new, while extrinsic motivation stems from external rewards like passing exams or pursuing a particular career.I argue that teachers should consider both short-term and long-term relevance when planning lessons, as well as the cost-benefit balance for pupils in terms of stress, effort, and hard work. Using personal examples from my own schooling experience, I illustrate how a teacher's intervention and support can help students overcome challenges and develop their skills within their zone of proximal development.Throughout the episode, I stress the importance of teachers conducting research in their classrooms to challenge assumptions and understand pupils' motivations better. By being aware of the complexities surrounding intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, teachers can create more engaging and effective learning experiences in design and technology. I invite listeners to share their thoughts on the conversation with Phil, and Remke's paper, and how it may have influenced their understanding of motivation in the classroom.(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)Mentioned in this episodeLearning to Teach Design and TechnologyKlapwijk, R. (2023). Secondary Students Intrinsic Motivation during Multidisciplinary STEAM projects : A quantitative study on the influence of competence, autonomy and relatedness in secondary Dutch classrooms. The 40th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Proceedings 2023, 1(October). Retrieved from https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/PATT40/article/view/997Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode of Talking D&T, I interview Phil Jones, a full-time D&T teacher and subject leader at a school in Merseyside, who is also a part-time doctoral student at Liverpool John Moores University. Phil shares his experience as part of the organizing committee for the PATT (Pupils' Attitude Towards Technology) conference and discusses a paper that grabbed his attention during the event.The paper, authored by Remke Klapwijk from the Netherlands, explores secondary students' intrinsic motivation during multidisciplinary STEAM projects. Phil and I delve into the study's findings, which surprisingly showed no significant effect on motivation despite the initial hypothesis. We also discuss the implications of these results for teaching practice and the importance of challenging assumptions about the impact of multidisciplinary projects on student motivation.Phil also provides insights into his own doctoral research, which focuses on design thinking at Key Stage 3 D&T and the relationship between skills and knowledge. He explains his data collection methods, including using validated instruments, portfolios, presentations, student field notes, and focus groups. We discuss the value of pursuing postgraduate studies as a D&T teacher and the importance of research in providing an evidence base for the subject's impact. Finally, we reflect on the benefits of presenting at conferences, such as receiving valuable feedback and engaging with the wider D&T community.(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)Mentioned in the showPhil on LinkedIn Work Upton SchoolKlapwijk, R. (2023). Secondary Students Intrinsic Motivation during Multidisciplinary STEAM projects : A quantitative study on the influence of competence, autonomy and relatedness in secondary Dutch classrooms. Learning to Teach Design and TechnologyTechnasiumIntrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI)Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. Support the showIf you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Subscriber-only episodeIn this episode of Talking D&T, I delve into the complex topic of teaching children to understand and articulate the agency and values inherent in designed objects. Inspired by my recent conversation with Alice about object agency, I reflect on the challenges and importance of equipping students with the knowledge and language necessary to critically examine the technological world around them.Throughout the episode, I explore the limitations of simplistic frameworks like Access FM and emphasise the need for teachers to strategically select content that builds students' knowledge base over time. I introduce David Layton's list of values as a potentially powerful tool for structuring lessons around technical, economic, aesthetic, social, environmental, moral and spiritual dimensions of objects. However, I argue that such frameworks are only effective if students have the requisite understanding of materials, processes, and terminology to engage in meaningful analysis.As I grapple with the complexity of teaching design and technology, I emphasize the importance of spiraling knowledge development and providing opportunities for students to practice applying their understanding to decode the implicit and explicit values embedded in designed objects. Ultimately, I position the ability to critically examine object agency and values as a crucial aspect of design and technology education. I challenge teachers to move beyond superficial engagement with frameworks and to instead focus on equipping students with the rich knowledge and language needed to participate successfully in a complex designed world. My insights highlight the thought and care required to effectively support students in navigating an increasingly technological landscape.(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

In this episode, Alice Hellard and I explore the  impact of design on our lives and society. Alice's work highlights the importance of design education in navigating modern complexities, emphasising student agency and the dynamic relationship between humans and their environment.We talk about how objects like smartphones influence behaviors and interactions, prompting a shift in educational focus towards process over outcomes. Everyday objects are also examined as a means of exploring personal values and political expression - hear me get very excited talking about the Memphis design movement!Some of the topics we discuss are challenging to us both and maybe to listeners as well. We talk about ethical considerations in design education as we reflect on aesthetics, materials, and socio-political contexts plus we explore cultural  biases in museums and classrooms, and other social issues such as gender inequality.Overall, we hope the episode offers an insightful exploration of the ethical dimensions of design, encouraging active engagement and reflection.(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. Support the showIf you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Subscriber-only episodeHave you ever walked into a corporate foyer and felt as though you've stepped into a modern-day cathedral, with its grandeur either welcoming you or intimidating you? Now imagine that as a learning space for D&T...Join Alison in this episode as she explores that potential connections between space, values, and D&T education. Reflecting on personal experiences and professional insights, Alison examines the impact physical environments could have on pupils' learning, from corporate offices to renowned museums.Alison talks about how design choices communicate inclusivity or exclusivity, and how teachers can use these choices as learning points with  pupils. (Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Subscriber-only episodeIn this podcast episode, Alison discusses inclusive research practices and the significance of diversity within design and technology (D&T) education. Drawing from her conversation with Sarah Davies, Alison emphasises the inclusion of children as active participants and the importance of their work as valuable data in research. Additionally, she underscores the need to consider ethnicity, gender, and other aspects of diversity in research to ensure representation and inclusivity. Alison also promotes building research networks, providing practical tips for collaboration and knowledge sharing. Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

This is the first part of a conversation with Alice Hellard from Goldsmiths. We unravel the complexities of agency, design and objects agency in museum settings. Alice's research, presented at PATT40, looks at the often-overlooked emotional and philosophical connections we form with objects, and how these relationships are shaped by historical practices and curatorial decisions. Her research underscores the importance of bridging the gap between students and the items they study, challenging the conventional wisdom of design and technology education to foster a more profound understanding amongst students.Throughout our conversation, we dissect the nuanced power dynamics of museum displays, using examples like nude heels and the globalization of fashion to illustrate the limitations of current curatorial practices and their impact on cultural representation. We share our personal stories with iconic design pieces that evoke deep emotional responses, emphasizing their significance in our lives. Alice champions a future where museums not only exhibit objects but also facilitate immersive experiences that democratize design comprehension. By the end of this episode, you'll be inspired to think differently about the role of design in our lives and the potential it has to shape our relationship with the world.(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. Support the showIf you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Are you a D&T teacher or researcher navigating the complex world of academic writing and conferences? Unlock the mysteries of academic publishing as I sit down with Sarah Davies, the  editor-in-chief of the PATT40 conference. This week's episode explores the layers of the paper submission process, offering a comprehensive look at the journey from abstract to publication. We dissect the peer review system, emphasising its crucial role in fostering equality, diversity, and inclusion. If you're interested in what happens when you submit a paper, tune in to gain a deeper understanding of the supportive framework that upholds the integrity of educational research, and the collaborative efforts that ensure a manageable flow of contributions .Concluding with a nod to the power of research, we examine the themes that came from the PATT40 conference: teaching methods, curriculum design, and assessment strategies , with a special focus on how D&T classroom studies can influence broader educational conversations In our conversation, Sarah reveals the confidence and empowerment that arise when teachers actively participate in research, arming them with the tools to challenge conventional wisdom and advocate for subject-specific teaching approaches. This episode is a testament to the collective wisdom of the D&T teaching community and a "how-to" for those poised to make a difference through their research.(Text generated by AI, edited, a little, by Alison Hardy)LinksHome - Camtree website supporting close-to-practice research for  teachers Researching D&T website Masculinities and Femininities in the Design and Technology ClassroomPromoting Creativity in the Secondary Design and Technology Classroom in EnglandFind SarahThreads LinkedIn Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. Support the showIf you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show. If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here. If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!