DiscoverTalking Feds
Talking Feds
Claim Ownership

Talking Feds

Author: Harry Litman

Subscribed: 4,573Played: 217,561
Share

Description


TALKING FEDS is a roundtable discussion that brings together prominent former government officials, journalists, and special guests for a dynamic and in-depth analysis of the most pressing questions in law and politics.


370 Episodes
Reverse
Comments (41)

Terri Hunt

The migrant Trump/Vance assertion about eating dogs and cats referenced Springfield, OH, not Springfield, IL, for what that's worth.

Feb 5th
Reply

Mickey

started to listen then immediately moved on when I heard you had Sikes on. won't listen to his bs.

Dec 2nd
Reply

Bea Kiddo

Thank goodness we have Harry. #talkingfeds

Dec 1st
Reply

Bea Kiddo

Harry is the best.

Dec 1st
Reply (1)

Adam

Test

Nov 3rd
Reply

MikeS

Harry, Judge Luttig, Superb! You make the Constitution - 14.3, immunity - clear as day to a simple systems engineer (who's most substantial legal qualification is, my best friend is a lawyer!) And you did it with grace, and a sense of humor! Thank you!**

Sep 25th
Reply

john michaels

el xug1c9

Aug 5th
Reply

Ciara Black

w2x3zzs8

May 1st
Reply

Dan Williams

Every week you spend time talking about how Trump is going to go to prison and today you focus the show on what's going to happen if he gets elected. He's going to prison he's not going to be elected. You and all the rest of the media need to stop with this nonsense.

Dec 11th
Reply (1)

John Walsh

The Judge should bar him from posting on social media, including his own Twitter knockoff. He can still make election related posts but only through his official election campaign that way any threats might be filtered out if others are also culpable for any threats he makes.

Aug 7th
Reply

Jenny Mummert

you guys are fun

Jul 16th
Reply

John Walsh

This is a text book example of an academic abuse of process where the litigant had no legitimate standing before the court... she had suffered no wrong in need of a remedy. Instead, the case appears to have served the MAGA Judges the opportunity to enforce their religious bigotry over society.

Jul 3rd
Reply

John Walsh

Great episode... Worth listening to again.

May 15th
Reply

DogMom

Excellent panel. Great to have Congresswoman Lofgren, especially. However, I always listen whenever Andrew Weissman is your guest. Well done!

Oct 17th
Reply

Claire Lundgren

dream team

Jul 20th
Reply

Emmm Arrrrr

great conversation!

Dec 29th
Reply

Eliza Howarth

onw of the best I've heard here

Dec 14th
Reply

Terri Hunt

How sincere can an attack on Kamala Harris be if no one said a thing when she ran for PRESIDENT, but beings this nonsense only when she is selected as a VP candidate? Seems completely insincere not to voice a concern, if valid, when she ran for president. Besides the obvious fact that the complaint is just WRONG, of course.

Aug 19th
Reply

Myron McLeod

This podcast is a national treasure. Amazing guests!!

Jul 27th
Reply

Barb Krull

I can't thank you enough for posting pod cast like this. I'm a nurse with limited knowledge about the justice system. not because I don't want to know bit I sometimes struggle with it being out of my scope/understanding. You have a way of speaking about all these topics in a way that I can understand. I think understanding these topics as a citizen are critical and I'm so thankful for your time.

Jul 6th
Reply
loading
We and our partners use cookies to personalize your experience, to show you ads based on your interests, and for measurement and analytics purposes. By using our website and our services, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Cookie Policy.