Talking Feds
Subscribed: 4,573Played: 217,561
Subscribe
© 2019-2020 Harry Litman 366137
Description
TALKING FEDS is a roundtable discussion that brings together prominent former government officials, journalists, and special guests for a dynamic and in-depth analysis of the most pressing questions in law and politics.
370 Episodes
Reverse
Top Podcasts
The Best New Comedy Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best News Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Business Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Sports Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New True Crime Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Joe Rogan Experience Podcast Right Now – June 20The Best New Dan Bongino Show Podcast Right Now – June 20The Best New Mark Levin Podcast – June 2024
The migrant Trump/Vance assertion about eating dogs and cats referenced Springfield, OH, not Springfield, IL, for what that's worth.
started to listen then immediately moved on when I heard you had Sikes on. won't listen to his bs.
Thank goodness we have Harry. #talkingfeds
Harry is the best.
Test
Harry, Judge Luttig, Superb! You make the Constitution - 14.3, immunity - clear as day to a simple systems engineer (who's most substantial legal qualification is, my best friend is a lawyer!) And you did it with grace, and a sense of humor! Thank you!**
el xug1c9
w2x3zzs8
Every week you spend time talking about how Trump is going to go to prison and today you focus the show on what's going to happen if he gets elected. He's going to prison he's not going to be elected. You and all the rest of the media need to stop with this nonsense.
The Judge should bar him from posting on social media, including his own Twitter knockoff. He can still make election related posts but only through his official election campaign that way any threats might be filtered out if others are also culpable for any threats he makes.
you guys are fun
This is a text book example of an academic abuse of process where the litigant had no legitimate standing before the court... she had suffered no wrong in need of a remedy. Instead, the case appears to have served the MAGA Judges the opportunity to enforce their religious bigotry over society.
Great episode... Worth listening to again.
Excellent panel. Great to have Congresswoman Lofgren, especially. However, I always listen whenever Andrew Weissman is your guest. Well done!
dream team
great conversation!
onw of the best I've heard here
How sincere can an attack on Kamala Harris be if no one said a thing when she ran for PRESIDENT, but beings this nonsense only when she is selected as a VP candidate? Seems completely insincere not to voice a concern, if valid, when she ran for president. Besides the obvious fact that the complaint is just WRONG, of course.
This podcast is a national treasure. Amazing guests!!
I can't thank you enough for posting pod cast like this. I'm a nurse with limited knowledge about the justice system. not because I don't want to know bit I sometimes struggle with it being out of my scope/understanding. You have a way of speaking about all these topics in a way that I can understand. I think understanding these topics as a citizen are critical and I'm so thankful for your time.