The Diddy Diaries

The real path to understanding the Jeffrey Epstein scandal has always been through the money trail, not the headlines. Forget the flight logs and the gossip; the truth is buried in wire transfers, offshore accounts, and the banks that made his lifestyle possible. Institutions like JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank weren’t just passive observers—they were the arteries of his operation, moving, cleaning, and protecting the cash that bought him influence and silence. Every payment, donation, and “investment” was a breadcrumb leading back to the people who enabled him, the ones who used wealth to hide their involvement and distance themselves when the walls started closing in.Because money doesn’t lie—people do. The ledgers, the trusts, the financial filings—they’re the fingerprints no one can wash off. That’s why so much effort went into sealing records, cutting massive settlement checks, and painting Epstein as an isolated monster. But the paper trail tells a different story: a web of bankers, politicians, and institutions that thrived off the same rot. Epstein wasn’t the source of corruption—he was its broker. And if you truly want to know who was involved, you don’t chase the headlines or photos—you follow the money.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein records requested from Jamie Dimon, bank CEOs

Prominent attorney Tony Buzbee, known for representing numerous individuals alleging sexual misconduct by Sean "Diddy" Combs, is now facing an extortion lawsuit filed by an anonymous celebrity identified as "John Doe." The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, accuses Buzbee of attempting to extort substantial sums from Doe by threatening to publicize fabricated allegations of sexual assault, including claims involving minors, if financial demands were not met. The plaintiff contends that Buzbee's actions are part of a broader pattern of leveraging baseless accusations against high-profile individuals to secure monetary settlements.In response, Buzbee has denied the extortion allegations, asserting that the lawsuit is an attempt to intimidate and silence survivors of sexual assault. He maintains that his communications, including demand letters sent to potential defendants, were standard legal procedures aimed at seeking confidential mediation on behalf of his clients, without any threats or specific monetary demands. Buzbee emphasized his commitment to advocating for sexual assault survivors and expressed his intention to continue pursuing justice for his clients despite the lawsuit against him.(commercial at 8:12)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tony-buzbee-lawsuit.pdf

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, originally designed to dismantle organized crime syndicates like the mafia, has evolved into a powerful legal tool used to prosecute a wide range of criminal enterprises, including those involving high-profile figures in the entertainment industry. RICO allows prosecutors to target entire criminal organizations, holding leaders accountable for the actions of their subordinates by linking various crimes—such as fraud, drug trafficking, and sexual misconduct—into a broader criminal enterprise. This statute has been instrumental in cases like those of R. Kelly and Keith Raniere, where both men were convicted for operating criminal networks that exploited vulnerable individuals under the guise of legitimate businesses or celebrity status.Sean Combs now faces RICO charges, as prosecutors allege that he operated a criminal enterprise involving sexual misconduct and other criminal activities, with enablers supporting and facilitating his actions. The RICO charges mark a significant escalation in Combs' legal battle, and the potential for superseding indictments could further expand the scope of the case. As seen in previous high-profile RICO cases, this approach enables prosecutors to systematically dismantle the criminal network around the defendant. The outcome of Combs' case could set a new precedent for how the legal system addresses powerful figures in the entertainment industry, reaffirming that no one is beyond the reach of the law, regardless of their wealth or influence.At Sean "Diddy" Combs' October 10, 2024 hearing, he appeared in Manhattan federal court before Judge Arun Subramanian. The session mainly involved setting deadlines for both the defense and prosecution to file their legal arguments in preparation for the upcoming trial, which is expected to take place in May of 2025.Diddy remains in custody at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. His defense continues to push for his release on bail, which has been denied multiple times due to concerns about witness tampering and flight risk. His legal team had previously offered a $50 million bail package, which included home detention and electronic monitoring, but it was rejected as the court considered him a potential danger to the community.During Sean "Diddy" Combs' October 10, 2024, hearing, his legal team addressed concerns about potential media leaks related to evidence in his case. His attorneys requested that the court impose a gag order to prevent further leaks from law enforcement, which they claim have already influenced public perception and could affect the fairness of the trial. Diddy's team alleges that government agents leaked sensitive material, including a 2016 surveillance video, to the media, compromising his right to a fair trial. The judge has asked the sides to draw up acceptable language for the order.The charges against Diddy include sex trafficking and racketeering, with allegations dating back to 2008. Prosecutors claim that he ran a criminal enterprise, coercing women with the help of his associates and using violence, blackmail, and other forms of intimidation to silence victims. The court appearance also allowed for both sides to discuss procedural aspects, such as evidence handling, and outline the next steps leading up to the high-profile trial. Diddy has pleaded not guilty to all charges(commercial at 14:00)to contact me:  bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May trial date set for Diddy to face sex trafficking charges | AP News

Ashley Parham's lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs contains shocking accusations of sexual assault and physical violence. Parham claims that in 2018, after making a comment accusing Diddy of being involved in Tupac Shakur's murder, she became a target of his retaliation. According to the lawsuit, Diddy threatened her and eventually lured her to a private residence, where he allegedly assaulted her physically and sexually. Parham states that he held a knife to her face, threatened her with a "Glasgow smile," and humiliated her in front of others.Further details in the lawsuit describe how Diddy, along with his associates, sexually assaulted Parham using various objects, all while threatening her life. She recounts waking up from the ordeal, grabbing a knife, and confronting Diddy in a desperate attempt to escape. Parham alleges that Diddy begged for his life during the confrontation and that she narrowly escaped after grazing him with the knife. Despite reporting the assault to local police, Parham claims that no investigation was opened, intensifying her allegations against Diddy and his associates.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Complaint (newsnationnow.com)

Singer Good Fridae has made serious allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs regarding an event she attended at the age of 16. Fridae claimed she met Diddy at a Toronto autograph signing in 1999, where he invited her and a friend to one of his infamous "freak off" parties. Despite informing Diddy that they were underage, Diddy allegedly dismissed the concern, stating that he didn’t check IDs at his parties. At the hotel event, Fridae recalled seeing heavy drug use, including ecstasy and cocaine, and sexual activities involving dancers and hired individuals. Although she was not involved, the scene deeply disturbed her, especially when she observed a locked, guarded room that appeared to be hosting even more explicit activities. The experience left her feeling vulnerable and uneasy, as she had previously sensed negative energy from Diddy during their initial encounter​.As the night progressed, Fridae was told that there were two separate parties, with the second, more exclusive gathering, being referred to as the "freak off." A security guard allegedly prevented her from leaving the party until Diddy invited her to this second room. Frightened, Fridae managed to escape by pretending her phone was still working, threatening to call her father. She claims Diddy chased after her angrily as she fled down the hallway. These allegations have surfaced amidst a wave of accusations against Diddy, who is currently facing multiple charges, including racketeering and sex trafficking. Fridae expressed relief over Diddy's arrest, stating that many people had anticipated this outcome due to his behavior at such events.Let's dive in and see what she had to say!(commercial at 10:40)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Inside Diddy's 'freak-off' parties with NBA players, ‘terrified’ teen girls, piles of cocaine, and public sex | The Sun

Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team is reportedly considering calling sex workers as witnesses in his upcoming trial to support his defense against sex trafficking and related charges. The defense aims to demonstrate that interactions between Combs and these individuals were consensual and part of lawful adult entertainment, challenging the prosecution's narrative of coercion and exploitation. This strategy seeks to counter allegations by presenting testimony that portrays the relationships as consensual and transactional, rather than abusive or criminal.Segment two...Sean "Diddy" Combs has issued a cease-and-desist letter to his former protégé, Moses "Shyne" Barrow, in response to statements made in Shyne's new Hulu documentary, "The Honorable Shyne." The documentary revisits a 1999 nightclub shooting incident involving both men, during which Shyne alleges he was unjustly made the "fall guy" while Diddy was acquitted. Shyne claims Diddy persuaded witnesses to testify against him, leading to his conviction and subsequent eight-year prison sentence. Diddy's representatives have categorically denied these allegations, labeling them as "unequivocally false." They assert that Diddy was acquitted of all charges related to the incident and has consistently maintained his innocenceSegment three...During a recent court hearing, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian questioned whether Sean "Diddy" Combs had added the word "Legal" to his jailhouse notes after their initial creation. This inquiry arose amid disputes over the seizure of Combs' handwritten notes from his cell, which his defense argues are protected by attorney-client privilege. The judge's concern centers on the possibility that Combs may have retroactively labeled the notes to prevent their use by prosecutors in his upcoming sex trafficking trial.(commercial at 10:15)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:The Source |Diddy’s Legal Team To Call Escorts As Witnesses In Third Bail HearingDiddy Issues Cease-and-Desist Over Shyne Documentary AllegationsJudge Asks If Diddy Retroactively Wrote 'Legal' on His Jail Notes - Business Insider

Reports indicate that Sean "Diddy" Combs allegedly spent approximately $500,000 on a "Freak Off" party in the early 2000s, which included redecorating a room in his mansion with hundreds of mirrors on the walls and ceiling to enhance the viewing experience of the event. These gatherings were characterized by extravagant expenditures on high-end food, expensive alcohol, dancers, acrobats, and sometimes live animals, contributing to the overall cost. The parties reportedly featured explicit activities, with the mirrored room designed to reflect the events occurring within.In our second segment...In November 2024, DeWitt Gilmore filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs and his bodyguards, alleging that they physically assaulted him outside a New York City nightclub in the summer of 1996. According to Gilmore, after exiting the club, Combs and his entourage confronted him, leading to a verbal altercation that escalated when armed members of Combs' group blocked his car and fired shots. Gilmore claims he and his friends narrowly escaped the scene by accelerating through traffic. Combs' representatives have dismissed the allegations as "pure fiction," expressing confidence that the judicial process will reveal the truth.(commercial at 9:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Exclusive | Diddy redecorated room with hundreds of mirrors for $500K 'Freak Off'source:Diddy sued by man for 1996 physical assault outside club

In 2011, Cantor Gaming stormed into Las Vegas with the swagger of Wall Street, led by Howard Lutnick at the helm of the parent company Cantor Fitzgerald and Lee Amaitis running the Nevada operation. Known for pioneering mobile sports wagering and accepting unprecedented high-limit bets—sometimes as large as $500,000—Cantor positioned itself as the cutting edge of sports gaming. To many, it looked like a revolution: bettors flocked to its books at the M Resort and beyond, drawn by the promise of action other operators wouldn’t touch. But behind the gloss of innovation, Cantor became entangled in one of the largest illegal betting scandals in modern history. The so-called “Jersey Boys,” an East Coast ring with deep ties to organized bookmaking, infiltrated the operation through Cantor executive Michael  Colbert. With Colbert as their insider, the crew laundered millions through Cantor’s system, exploiting the company’s appetite for volume and its disregard for traditional risk limits.The scheme collapsed in 2012 when Colbert and more than two dozen associates were arrested in a sweeping FBI crackdown. Nevada regulators soon levied one of the largest fines in state history—$5.5 million—citing Cantor’s lack of oversight. Amaitis stepped down in 2016, his reputation scarred, while the Cantor brand itself was rebranded as CG Technology in a failed attempt to shed its baggage. By 2020, the company was sold to William Hill, its ambitions of dominating Las Vegas reduced to a cautionary tale. The Jersey Boys scandal not only crippled Cantor but reshaped the entire sports gaming industry, ushering in stricter compliance, tighter wagering oversight, and a lasting reminder that unchecked ambition and Wall Street arrogance could topple even the flashiest of innovators.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In 2011, Cantor Gaming stormed into Las Vegas with the swagger of Wall Street, led by Howard Lutnick at the helm of the parent company Cantor Fitzgerald and Lee Amaitis running the Nevada operation. Known for pioneering mobile sports wagering and accepting unprecedented high-limit bets—sometimes as large as $500,000—Cantor positioned itself as the cutting edge of sports gaming. To many, it looked like a revolution: bettors flocked to its books at the M Resort and beyond, drawn by the promise of action other operators wouldn’t touch. But behind the gloss of innovation, Cantor became entangled in one of the largest illegal betting scandals in modern history. The so-called “Jersey Boys,” an East Coast ring with deep ties to organized bookmaking, infiltrated the operation through Cantor executive Michael  Colbert. With Colbert as their insider, the crew laundered millions through Cantor’s system, exploiting the company’s appetite for volume and its disregard for traditional risk limits.The scheme collapsed in 2012 when Colbert and more than two dozen associates were arrested in a sweeping FBI crackdown. Nevada regulators soon levied one of the largest fines in state history—$5.5 million—citing Cantor’s lack of oversight. Amaitis stepped down in 2016, his reputation scarred, while the Cantor brand itself was rebranded as CG Technology in a failed attempt to shed its baggage. By 2020, the company was sold to William Hill, its ambitions of dominating Las Vegas reduced to a cautionary tale. The Jersey Boys scandal not only crippled Cantor but reshaped the entire sports gaming industry, ushering in stricter compliance, tighter wagering oversight, and a lasting reminder that unchecked ambition and Wall Street arrogance could topple even the flashiest of innovators.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Federal prosecutors have filed a comprehensive forfeiture list detailing the property seized from Sean “Diddy” Combs’ homes in Los Angeles and Miami, which they allege were instrumental in organizing and documenting his so-called “Freak Off” parties. According to court filings and search inventories, agents confiscated more than 1,000 bottles of baby oil and lubricant, along with narcotics, firearms, luxury electronics, and a vast collection of recording devices—including phones, cameras, laptops, and hard drives. Investigators claim these items were used to facilitate, record, or control sexual encounters that are central to the Mann Act and sex trafficking counts in his federal indictment. The materials also include stage lighting, props, and specialized video equipment allegedly used to produce and store illicit recordings.Federal prosecutors have filed a comprehensive forfeiture list detailing the property seized from Sean “Diddy” Combs’ homes in Los Angeles and Miami, which they allege were instrumental in organizing and documenting his so-called “Freak Off” parties. According to court filings and search inventories, agents confiscated more than 1,000 bottles of baby oil and lubricant, along with narcotics, firearms, luxury electronics, and a vast collection of recording devices—including phones, cameras, laptops, and hard drives. Investigators claim these items were used to facilitate, record, or control sexual encounters that are central to the Mann Act and sex trafficking counts in his federal indictment. The materials also include stage lighting, props, and specialized video equipment allegedly used to produce and store illicit recordings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.533.0.pdf

Liza Gardner’s lawsuit, filed in November 2023 under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, alleges that in 1990 she was sexually assaulted by Sean “Diddy” Combs and singer Aaron Hall when she was 16 years old. According to her complaint, Gardner attended an event hosted by MCA Records, where she and a friend were given drinks and then invited to an after-party at Hall’s apartment. She claims Combs coerced her into having sex with him, then as she was dressing, Hall entered the room, pinned her down, and forced her to have sex with him too. She also asserts that in the days following the assault, Combs came to her home, beat and choked her until she lost consciousness.In her amended complaint, Gardner emphasizes that she was a minor at the time—under New York’s age of consent in 1990—and contends that she could not legally consent to drinking alcohol with the accused. She further alleges that the sexual assault left her with lasting psychological harm, including depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and difficulty forming relationships.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.njd.551633.42.0.pdf

Liza Gardner’s lawsuit, filed in November 2023 under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, alleges that in 1990 she was sexually assaulted by Sean “Diddy” Combs and singer Aaron Hall when she was 16 years old. According to her complaint, Gardner attended an event hosted by MCA Records, where she and a friend were given drinks and then invited to an after-party at Hall’s apartment. She claims Combs coerced her into having sex with him, then as she was dressing, Hall entered the room, pinned her down, and forced her to have sex with him too. She also asserts that in the days following the assault, Combs came to her home, beat and choked her until she lost consciousness.In her amended complaint, Gardner emphasizes that she was a minor at the time—under New York’s age of consent in 1990—and contends that she could not legally consent to drinking alcohol with the accused. She further alleges that the sexual assault left her with lasting psychological harm, including depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and difficulty forming relationships.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.njd.551633.42.0.pdf

The first week of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial in New York featured emotionally charged testimony from his former partner, singer Cassie Ventura. Over four days, Ventura detailed an 11-year relationship marked by coercion, physical abuse, and manipulation. She described being forced into drug-fueled "freak-offs"—group sex encounters with paid escorts—often filmed and allegedly used by Combs for blackmail. A 2016 hotel surveillance video showing Combs assaulting Ventura was presented as evidence. Ventura also recounted an incident where Combs allegedly threatened to suspend someone over a balcony, illustrating a pattern of intimidation and control.The defense acknowledged Combs' history of violence and substance abuse but argued that these actions did not constitute sex trafficking. They portrayed the events as part of a consensual lifestyle, aiming to separate personal misconduct from criminal enterprise. Additional testimony from singer Dawn Richard supported Ventura's claims, recalling a 2009 incident where Combs allegedly assaulted Ventura over a domestic dispute. The prosecution contends that Combs operated a criminal network involving staff who facilitated the alleged abuses. The trial, expected to last several more weeks, continues to draw significant public attention.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comshow less

The first week of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial in New York featured emotionally charged testimony from his former partner, singer Cassie Ventura. Over four days, Ventura detailed an 11-year relationship marked by coercion, physical abuse, and manipulation. She described being forced into drug-fueled "freak-offs"—group sex encounters with paid escorts—often filmed and allegedly used by Combs for blackmail. A 2016 hotel surveillance video showing Combs assaulting Ventura was presented as evidence. Ventura also recounted an incident where Combs allegedly threatened to suspend someone over a balcony, illustrating a pattern of intimidation and control.The defense acknowledged Combs' history of violence and substance abuse but argued that these actions did not constitute sex trafficking. They portrayed the events as part of a consensual lifestyle, aiming to separate personal misconduct from criminal enterprise. Additional testimony from singer Dawn Richard supported Ventura's claims, recalling a 2009 incident where Combs allegedly assaulted Ventura over a domestic dispute. The prosecution contends that Combs operated a criminal network involving staff who facilitated the alleged abuses. The trial, expected to last several more weeks, continues to draw significant public attention.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comshow less

The Prosecution:   During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, prosecutors portrayed him as a powerful figure who led a criminal enterprise over two decades. Assistant U.S. Attorney Emily Johnson described Combs as having a "larger than life" public persona with a darker side that involved coercing women into drug-fueled sexual encounters and using violence to maintain control. The prosecution alleged that Combs's inner circle, including bodyguards and high-ranking employees, assisted in committing and concealing crimes such as kidnapping, arson, bribery, and obstruction of justice. Key evidence includes testimonies from three women—ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, a woman referred to as "Jane," and a former assistant named "Mia"—as well as surveillance footage from a 2016 incident showing Combs assaulting Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel hallway.Prosecutors detailed disturbing allegations, including Combs orchestrating events known as "freak-offs," where women were allegedly forced into degrading acts with male sex workers. One specific claim involved Combs instructing a sex worker to urinate in Ventura's mouth during such an event. The prosecution contends that these acts were part of a broader pattern of abuse and exploitation facilitated by Combs's entertainment empire. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, which include racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution, and faces the possibility of life imprisonment if convicted.The  Defense:During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, his defense team, led by attorney Teny Geragos, acknowledged Combs's history of violence and temper but firmly denied that his actions constituted sex trafficking, racketeering, or prostitution. Geragos portrayed the case as one centered on "love, jealousy, infidelity, and money," arguing that the relationships in question were consensual adult interactions, including participation in a "swinger's lifestyle." She emphasized that while Combs may have exhibited abusive behavior, the prosecution's attempt to classify these personal relationships as criminal enterprises was a mischaracterization.The defense also sought to humanize Combs, reminding jurors that he is not on trial for being "mean" or a "jerk," but for specific criminal charges that they argue are unfounded. Geragos highlighted that the government's case intrudes into Combs's private life without sufficient legal basis, asserting that the alleged victims were capable individuals who made their own choices. She contended that the prosecution's narrative was an overreach, attempting to criminalize consensual activities and personal flawsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(4) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial opening statements | CNN

The unnamed plaintiff alleges Justin Combs lured her from Louisiana to Los Angeles in April 2017 by promising a job opportunity in the entertainment industry. She claims Justin contacted her via Snapchat, requested risqué photos, and arranged for her to fly to Beverly Hills under the pretense of career advancement. Once there, she says she was given alcohol, marijuana, and prescription pills—including poppers—believing them to be laced with additional substances. After she became intoxicated, three masked men entered the residence, one of whom she identified as Sean “Diddy” Combs based on his stature and mannerisms. The lawsuit alleges she was raped multiple times—both anally and orally—by these men over the course of nearly 18 hours, from Saturday night into Sunday afternoon, before being flown home.According to the complaint, the assault was orchestrated to exploit her while she was incapacitated and to ensure compliance through fear. She alleges Justin referred to his father as “Pops” during the assault, implicating Sean Combs directly. The woman says she felt trapped and threatened—“You better let this happen. Or else,” she recalled them saying . The lawsuit further asserts that she was held in the house against her will, unable to leave or seek help until the following afternoon, when she was taken to the airport. Sean Combs’s legal team immediately denied the allegations and affirmed his innocence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs and son Justin accused of 'brutal gang rape' in lawsuit

As expected, the flood gates have now opened when it comes to allegations made against Diddy and in this epiosde, we take a look at what April Lampros says happened to her at the hands of Diddy.The NYC Gender Motivated Violence Act (GMVA), codified in N.Y.C. Administrative Code §§ 8-901 et seq., is a law enacted by New York City to address and provide legal remedies for gender-motivated violence. Here are some key points about the Act:Purpose: The GMVA aims to provide a civil remedy for individuals who are victims of gender-motivated violence. This type of violence is defined as a crime of violence committed because of gender or on the basis of gender.Definitions:Crime of Violence: The Act defines a "crime of violence" as any act or series of acts that would constitute a misdemeanor or felony under the penal law of New York State.Gender-Motivated: A crime is considered "gender-motivated" if it is committed, at least in part, because of the victim’s gender or on the basis of gender.Civil Action:Victims of gender-motivated violence have the right to file a civil lawsuit against the perpetrator.The Act allows victims to seek compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorney's fees and costs.Statute of Limitations:There is a seven-year statute of limitations for filing a civil action under the GMVA, which begins from the date of the last act of gender-motivated violence.Burden of Proof:In a civil action under the GMVA, the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the violence was gender-motivated.Relation to Other Laws:The GMVA is intended to complement existing laws and does not preclude victims from seeking other legal remedies available under state or federal law.(commercial at 7:17)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:not_assigned_april_lampros_v_sean_combs_et_al_summons___complaint_1_1716553445.pdf (documentcloud.org)

As expected, the flood gates have now opened when it comes to allegations made against Diddy and in this epiosde, we take a look at what April Lampros says happened to her at the hands of Diddy.The NYC Gender Motivated Violence Act (GMVA), codified in N.Y.C. Administrative Code §§ 8-901 et seq., is a law enacted by New York City to address and provide legal remedies for gender-motivated violence. Here are some key points about the Act:Purpose: The GMVA aims to provide a civil remedy for individuals who are victims of gender-motivated violence. This type of violence is defined as a crime of violence committed because of gender or on the basis of gender.Definitions:Crime of Violence: The Act defines a "crime of violence" as any act or series of acts that would constitute a misdemeanor or felony under the penal law of New York State.Gender-Motivated: A crime is considered "gender-motivated" if it is committed, at least in part, because of the victim’s gender or on the basis of gender.Civil Action:Victims of gender-motivated violence have the right to file a civil lawsuit against the perpetrator.The Act allows victims to seek compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorney's fees and costs.Statute of Limitations:There is a seven-year statute of limitations for filing a civil action under the GMVA, which begins from the date of the last act of gender-motivated violence.Burden of Proof:In a civil action under the GMVA, the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the violence was gender-motivated.Relation to Other Laws:The GMVA is intended to complement existing laws and does not preclude victims from seeking other legal remedies available under state or federal law.(commercial at 7:17)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:not_assigned_april_lampros_v_sean_combs_et_al_summons___complaint_1_1716553445.pdf (documentcloud.org)

As expected, the flood gates have now opened when it comes to allegations made against Diddy and in this epiosde, we take a look at what April Lampros says happened to her at the hands of Diddy.The NYC Gender Motivated Violence Act (GMVA), codified in N.Y.C. Administrative Code §§ 8-901 et seq., is a law enacted by New York City to address and provide legal remedies for gender-motivated violence. Here are some key points about the Act:Purpose: The GMVA aims to provide a civil remedy for individuals who are victims of gender-motivated violence. This type of violence is defined as a crime of violence committed because of gender or on the basis of gender.Definitions:Crime of Violence: The Act defines a "crime of violence" as any act or series of acts that would constitute a misdemeanor or felony under the penal law of New York State.Gender-Motivated: A crime is considered "gender-motivated" if it is committed, at least in part, because of the victim’s gender or on the basis of gender.Civil Action:Victims of gender-motivated violence have the right to file a civil lawsuit against the perpetrator.The Act allows victims to seek compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorney's fees and costs.Statute of Limitations:There is a seven-year statute of limitations for filing a civil action under the GMVA, which begins from the date of the last act of gender-motivated violence.Burden of Proof:In a civil action under the GMVA, the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the violence was gender-motivated.Relation to Other Laws:The GMVA is intended to complement existing laws and does not preclude victims from seeking other legal remedies available under state or federal law.(commercial at 7:17)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:not_assigned_april_lampros_v_sean_combs_et_al_summons___complaint_1_1716553445.pdf (documentcloud.org)

On Oct. 7, Bondi faced intense questioning by Senate Democrats over what the Justice Department has done (or not done) in investigating Epstein’s financial records, flagged suspicious-activity reports, and whether photos of former President Trump with underage women were found among Epstein’s belongings. She refused to answer how many “suspicious activity reports” had been reviewed, declined to confirm whether any photos were recovered, and sidestepped detailed explanations of internal DOJ decisions. Bondi instead turned questions back on the motives or prior actions of the senators.Bondi reaffirmed that the DOJ’s July decision to stop releasing additional Epstein-files remains in force, saying no “client list” has been found or is being made public. She criticized the senators for past resistance to releasing Epstein flight logs, accused some of accepting donations from associates of Epstein, and declined to elaborate on her internal deliberations — stressing legal and victim-privacy constraints as reasons for non-disclosure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonail.com