Today’s guest is Michael Mauboussin, Head of Consilient Research at Counterpoint Global, a $70 billion equity manager.
In today’s episode, Michael covers some of his latest research on market concentration, equity issuance and stock buybacks, and how the boom and bust cycle relates to AI today. He also shares some common attributes among great investors, lessons from Elon Musk & Tesla, and more.
(1:31) Guest Introduction: Michael Mauboussin
(2:41) Capital allocation and stock-based compensation
(9:58) Trivia question on the top performing stock
(15:56) Market concentration
(23:13) Modern value investing & the rise of intangibles
(28:45) Attributes of great investors
(33:09) Factors influencing total shareholder returns
(42:22) Technology, capitalism, and market predictability
(48:15) Indexing, market efficiency & book recommendations
(54:10) The Santa Fe Institute's interdisciplinary approach
-----
Follow Meb on Twitter, LinkedIn and YouTube
For detailed show notes, click here
To learn more about our funds and follow us, subscribe to our mailing list or visit us at cambriainvestments.com
-----
Today's episode is sponsored by YCharts. YCharts enables financial advisors to make smarter investment decisions and better communicate with clients. Visit YCharts to download their 2024 Election Guide & start your free trial - be sure to mention "Meb" for 20% off your subscription (new clients only).
Follow The Idea Farm: Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | TikTok
-----
Interested in sponsoring the show? Email us at Feedback@TheMebFaberShow.com
-----
Past guests include Ed Thorp, Richard Thaler, Jeremy Grantham, Joel Greenblatt, Campbell Harvey, Ivy Zelman, Kathryn Kaminski, Jason Calacanis, Whitney Baker, Aswath Damodaran, Howard Marks, Tom Barton, and many more.
-----
Meb's invested in some awesome startups that have passed along discounts to our listeners. Check them out here!
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
starts at 2:50
I really liked this one.
👍
am i hearing Jeff on this episode? welcome back.
like the concept but. but the expense ratio for Swan funds very high..not necessarily "cost effective'. 174bp to over 200 bp in expense ratio's is excessive.
awesome
Please forgive me if this is a stupid question, but is "negative 52 week momentum" the same as negative 52 week return?
Would like to know your thoughts on Vanguard's Financial Planning process which is essentially a one size fits all. Problem is the concentrated equity risk. They don't develop portfolios that mitigate the risk while achieving the same objective. And they will not discuss alternatives period, unless going thru their external Advisors where you pay a much higher % assets.