The lawsuit between Sean "Diddy" Combs and Diageo is centered on allegations of contract breaches and unequal treatment of Combs' liquor brands. Combs sued Diageo in May 2023, accusing the company of failing to properly support his brands, Cîroc Vodka and DeLeón Tequila, by not providing the resources necessary to position DeLeón as a premium product. Combs argued that Diageo underfunded and mismanaged the brands, which hindered their market performance.Diageo attempted to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming they had invested heavily in the brands. However, in August 2023, a judge allowed some of Combs’ claims to move forward, indicating there were legitimate issues to be addressed. Following this, Diageo ended its partnership with Combs, citing that their relationship had deteriorated due to ongoing disputes and public criticism.The lawsuit has raised questions about Diageo’s handling of Combs' brands and their contractual obligations. Combs seeks to hold Diageo accountable for what he claims is insufficient support that affected the brands' growth and market competitiveness.(commercial at 8:14)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:v0 (bwbx.io)
The lawsuit between Sean "Diddy" Combs and Diageo is centered on allegations of contract breaches and unequal treatment of Combs' liquor brands. Combs sued Diageo in May 2023, accusing the company of failing to properly support his brands, Cîroc Vodka and DeLeón Tequila, by not providing the resources necessary to position DeLeón as a premium product. Combs argued that Diageo underfunded and mismanaged the brands, which hindered their market performance.Diageo attempted to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming they had invested heavily in the brands. However, in August 2023, a judge allowed some of Combs’ claims to move forward, indicating there were legitimate issues to be addressed. Following this, Diageo ended its partnership with Combs, citing that their relationship had deteriorated due to ongoing disputes and public criticism.The lawsuit has raised questions about Diageo’s handling of Combs' brands and their contractual obligations. Combs seeks to hold Diageo accountable for what he claims is insufficient support that affected the brands' growth and market competitiveness.(commercial at 8:19)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:v0 (bwbx.io)
A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:Purpose:Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.Content:Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.Common Arguments:Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.Supporting Evidence:The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.Legal Standards:It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.(commercial at 7:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:Purpose:Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.Content:Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.Common Arguments:Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.Supporting Evidence:The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.Legal Standards:It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:Purpose:Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.Content:Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.Common Arguments:Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.Supporting Evidence:The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.Legal Standards:It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
We previously learned that Christian Combs was also named in a lawsuit claiming that he abused a woman who was employed on a yacht that his family rented. In this episode, we begin our look at that complaint. (commercial at 10:16)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-conformed-suit.pdf (deadline.com)
We previously learned that Christian Combs was also named in a lawsuit claiming that he abused a woman who was employed on a yacht that his family rented. In this episode, we begin our look at that complaint. (commercial at 7:09)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-conformed-suit.pdf (deadline.com)
We previously learned that Christian Combs was also named in a lawsuit claiming that he abused a woman who was employed on a yacht that his family rented. In this episode, we begin our look at that complaint. (commercial at 7:37)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-conformed-suit.pdf (deadline.com)
We previously learned that Christian Combs was also named in a lawsuit claiming that he abused a woman who was employed on a yacht that his family rented. In this episode, we begin our look at that complaint. (commercial at 7:09)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-conformed-suit.pdf (deadline.com)
Kevin Hart has been actively distancing himself from the controversies surrounding Sean "Diddy" Combs, especially after Diddy's arrest on charges of sex trafficking and racketeering. When asked by reporters about his involvement in hosting some of Diddy's infamous parties, Hart tactfully avoided the topic. During a recent outing, he was pressed with questions about whether he witnessed any of the questionable behavior at these events, such as the notorious "Freak Offs." Hart quickly shut down the inquiries, repeatedly stating, "Wrong person, wrong question," making it clear that he did not want to be associated with the scandal.Hart's avoidance of the subject has drawn attention, particularly after a video resurfaced showing him hosting one of Diddy's parties back in 2010. While no allegations have been made against Hart, his reluctance to engage on the matter has sparked speculation among some fans, who wonder if more revelations may emerge. Like other celebrities linked to Diddy, Hart appears keen to steer clear of the ongoing legal troubles surrounding the music mogul.(commercial at 8:31)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Kevin Hart is living 'on edge' in the wake of Diddy's sex trafficking probe as he fears being called out over resurfaced videos on his comedy tour | Daily Mail Online
Attorney Tony Buzbee, who represents over 120 accusers of Sean "Diddy" Combs, has been outspoken about his intention to expose not just Diddy, but also the enablers who supported or facilitated the alleged misconduct. During a press conference, Buzbee emphasized that these accomplices and bystanders played critical roles in allowing Diddy's abusive behavior to continue over decades. He stated that the names of these individuals would "shock" the public once revealed. Buzbee is meticulously gathering evidence and has warned those involved to come forward before their names are publicly exposed in court.Buzbee’s firm is currently preparing to file lawsuits in multiple states, with allegations ranging from sexual abuse to the use of drugs to facilitate these crimes. He has vowed to hold both individuals and corporate entities accountable, claiming that some businesses profited from or enabled Diddy's activities. Buzbee's approach is to thoroughly vet each case, ensuring that all evidence—such as photos, videos, and witness testimonies—is in place before taking action.(commercial at 7:17)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Lawyer for Diddy child accuser vows to out famous accomplices 'we all know' | Fox News
50 Cent is currently producing a Netflix documentary titled Diddy Do It, focusing on the numerous sexual assault, sex trafficking, and racketeering allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs. This multi-part docuseries aims to uncover the disturbing events surrounding Diddy’s infamous "freak-off" parties and the decades of allegations tied to them.The project, which Netflix secured after a competitive bidding war, is being produced by 50 Cent’s G-Unit Film & Television and directed by Alexandria Stapleton. The documentary will feature testimonies from former staff, security personnel, and other members of Diddy's inner circle, many of whom are now willing to come forward with details about what really happened at these secretive gatherings. The documentary is intended to give a voice to victims of abuse while exploring the broader impact on hip-hop culture.Production is ongoing, and while no release date has been set, the docuseries is expected to reveal significant new information as more alleged victims continue to step forward.(commercial at 8:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's former security and inner circle sign deals with Netflix to 'expose' disgraced star in 50 Cent's documentary | The US Sun (the-sun.com)
Jason Jolkowski, a 19-year-old from Omaha, Nebraska, disappeared on June 13, 2001, while walking to meet a coworker for a ride to work. Despite extensive investigations by the police and relentless advocacy by his family, no leads or evidence have surfaced to explain his disappearance. His mother, Kelly Jolkowski, founded Project Jason, a non-profit that supports families of missing persons, and pushed for legislative changes, resulting in the passage of “Jason's Law” in Nebraska. Numerous theories have been proposed, including abduction, medical emergency, or trafficking, but none have been substantiated. The family continues to fight for answers, utilizing new forensic technologies, private investigators, and public outreach efforts, keeping Jason's story alive and advocating for other missing persons. Jason's disappearance remains a haunting mystery, but his family's unbreakable determination to find him and bring awareness to others in similar situations endures.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
From the archives: 4-7-23Back in February we heard that police in Pennsylvania had started going through old cold cases looking for connections to Bryan Kohberger and the murders in Moscow. Now, fast forward two months and Chris Cuomo on Newsnation is telling us the same thing. We are also hearing from newsnation that Bryan Kohberger was in posession of at least one of the ID's of the victims from the murders in Moscow.(commercial at 7:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Investigated Over Other Homicides–Reports (newsweek.com)
Harve Pierre is a music industry executive, known primarily for his role as the President of Bad Boy Entertainment, a record label founded by Sean "Diddy" Combs. Pierre has been a key figure in the music business for over two decades, working closely with Diddy to oversee the label's operations and its roster of artists. He is known for his expertise in artist development, A&R (Artist and Repertoire), and overall strategic management within the music industry. Under his leadership, Bad Boy Entertainment has released numerous successful albums and singles, contributing to its significant impact on hip-hop and R&B music. Pierre's contributions have helped shape the careers of many prominent artists associated with Bad Boy, including The Notorious B.I.G., Faith Evans, and many others.He now finds himself caught up in the maelstrom that has engulfed Diddy as he has been directly accused by the alleged under aged accuser. In this episode, we take a look at his response. (commercial at 9:03)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Diddy has fired back at Joi Dickerson Neal and her allegations against him and in this episode, we are going to get a look at what Diddy had to say. A "Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Complaint" is a legal document filed by defendants in a lawsuit. Let's break down what each component means:Memorandum of Law: This is a written legal document that presents arguments and supporting authorities (such as statutes, regulations, and case law) in support of a specific legal position. It is used to persuade the court to rule in favor of the party presenting the memorandum.Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss: A motion to dismiss is a request made by one party in a lawsuit to terminate the case before it goes to trial. In this case, the defendants are asking the court to dismiss only certain parts of the complaint filed against them. This motion is "partial" because it seeks dismissal of only some claims or allegations, rather than the entire complaint.The Complaint: This refers to the initial document filed by the plaintiff(s) in a lawsuit, which outlines the claims and allegations against the defendant(s). The defendants' motion to dismiss is a response to the complaint, arguing that some or all of the claims in the complaint should be dismissed for various reasons, such as failure to state a legal claim, lack of jurisdiction, or other deficiencies in the complaint.So, the "Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Complaint" would be a document prepared by the defendants' legal team that lays out the legal arguments and authorities supporting their request to dismiss certain parts of the complaint. It would likely include analysis of relevant case law, statutes, and legal principles to demonstrate why the court should grant their motion to dismiss.(commercial at 13:02)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy-motion.pdf (documentcloud.org)
Diddy has fired back at Joi Dickerson Neal and her allegations against him and in this episode, we are going to get a look at what Diddy had to say. A "Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Complaint" is a legal document filed by defendants in a lawsuit. Let's break down what each component means:Memorandum of Law: This is a written legal document that presents arguments and supporting authorities (such as statutes, regulations, and case law) in support of a specific legal position. It is used to persuade the court to rule in favor of the party presenting the memorandum.Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss: A motion to dismiss is a request made by one party in a lawsuit to terminate the case before it goes to trial. In this case, the defendants are asking the court to dismiss only certain parts of the complaint filed against them. This motion is "partial" because it seeks dismissal of only some claims or allegations, rather than the entire complaint.The Complaint: This refers to the initial document filed by the plaintiff(s) in a lawsuit, which outlines the claims and allegations against the defendant(s). The defendants' motion to dismiss is a response to the complaint, arguing that some or all of the claims in the complaint should be dismissed for various reasons, such as failure to state a legal claim, lack of jurisdiction, or other deficiencies in the complaint.So, the "Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Complaint" would be a document prepared by the defendants' legal team that lays out the legal arguments and authorities supporting their request to dismiss certain parts of the complaint. It would likely include analysis of relevant case law, statutes, and legal principles to demonstrate why the court should grant their motion to dismiss.(commercial at 8:14)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy-motion.pdf (documentcloud.org)
In November 2023, Joi Dickerson-Neal filed a lawsuit accusing Sean "Diddy" Combs of drugging and raping her when she was a college student at Syracuse University in 1991. According to the allegations, Combs invited her to dinner, after which she reluctantly agreed to go with him. She claims that her drink was spiked, leaving her unable to stand or walk independently. She later learned that Combs had recorded the assault and shared the video with others in the music industry, an act she described as "revenge porn."This lawsuit emerged just as New York's Adult Survivors Act was about to expire, which allowed survivors of sexual assault to file claims long after the statute of limitations had passed. Combs has denied the allegations, calling them fabricated and a "money grab." Despite these denials, the lawsuit has garnered significant attention, adding to a series of similar accusations against the music mogul.In this episode we are taking a look at the complaint filed by Joi Dickerson-Neal.(commercial at 10:02)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:sexual assault lawsuit against Diddy - DocumentCloud
In November 2023, Joi Dickerson-Neal filed a lawsuit accusing Sean "Diddy" Combs of drugging and raping her when she was a college student at Syracuse University in 1991. According to the allegations, Combs invited her to dinner, after which she reluctantly agreed to go with him. She claims that her drink was spiked, leaving her unable to stand or walk independently. She later learned that Combs had recorded the assault and shared the video with others in the music industry, an act she described as "revenge porn."This lawsuit emerged just as New York's Adult Survivors Act was about to expire, which allowed survivors of sexual assault to file claims long after the statute of limitations had passed. Combs has denied the allegations, calling them fabricated and a "money grab." Despite these denials, the lawsuit has garnered significant attention, adding to a series of similar accusations against the music mogul.In this episode we are taking a look at the complaint filed by Joi Dickerson-Neal.(commercial at 8:09to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:sexual assault lawsuit against Diddy - DocumentCloud
In November 2023, Joi Dickerson-Neal filed a lawsuit accusing Sean "Diddy" Combs of drugging and raping her when she was a college student at Syracuse University in 1991. According to the allegations, Combs invited her to dinner, after which she reluctantly agreed to go with him. She claims that her drink was spiked, leaving her unable to stand or walk independently. She later learned that Combs had recorded the assault and shared the video with others in the music industry, an act she described as "revenge porn."This lawsuit emerged just as New York's Adult Survivors Act was about to expire, which allowed survivors of sexual assault to file claims long after the statute of limitations had passed. Combs has denied the allegations, calling them fabricated and a "money grab." Despite these denials, the lawsuit has garnered significant attention, adding to a series of similar accusations against the music mogul.In this episode we are taking a look at the complaint filed by Joi Dickerson-Neal.(commercial at 8:09to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:sexual assault lawsuit against Diddy - DocumentCloud