The Non-Prophets 22.31.1 2023-08-02 featuring Cynthia Cynthia McDonald, Infidel 64, Timothy Bethel and Teo El ATeo New Florida standards teach students that some Black people benefited from slavery because it taught useful skills, NBC News, By Antonio Planas, June 20, 2023https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/new-florida-standards-teach-black-people-benefited-slavery-taught-usef-rcna95418A new Florida standard teaches students that some black people benefited from slavery because it taught useful skills. The stop woke act requires Florida teachers to promote the view that black people benefited from slavery because they could learn skills that they could use in life in order for them to actually earn a living.We could speculate all day about why they do this, but the most obvious reason seems to be they don't like the idea of dealing with the oppression of minorities, women, LGBTQ people anytime they're faced with one of these groups being oppressed.They have to try to soften it and make statements about how it's really not that bad and certainly not as bad as these groups are making out to be. They claim these groups just want attention and they want more rights than other groups.Religious people love to act like they're the most suppressed people on Earth all the time. Bemoaning the idea that they can't even go into a Target because they sell kids t-shirts with LGBTQ on it.The goal of the new Florida standards is to completely undermine and devalue the experiences of slaves and the lasting impact slavery has had on the African-American community. They hide behind words like truth, but the reality is they want to create a narrative that the American slavery of black people wasn't that bad, and that it actually helped a lot of black people.Unfortunately, we have this group of people who they don't really want to think about the issues. They're so preconditioned against this woke agenda, that the anti-woke act sounds great to them.If you believe this view that slaves were singing happily in the field and try to pretend this is some type of trade program where they were going to end up with a lot of money and a great life at the end, you are being patently dishonest. You can't get a personal benefit if you're a slave for life.The violent indiscriminate massacre of African-Americans in Tulsa, Atlanta, and DC is treated as if there was some sort of parity, as if black people were also actively perpetuating violence in these events. Hundreds of people died in these massacres, but we could not bother to even count them. It is irresponsible to ignore that the people who died were guilty only of being black, and this fact is being whitewashed.It is telling that out of sixteen names listed as “beneficiaries”, only four of them were confirmed to ever having been a slave. You would think that their “comprehensive and rigorous instruction on African American History” could at least come up with a better list. Anthony Johnson was used as an example of a slave that benefited, but in actuality he was never a slave he was an indentured servant. Another was born 20 years after slavery was abolished.William Allen, the lead revisionist on this rewrite of history used the good old “a few isolated expressions without context.” excuse to defend their work. Haven’t we all heard that one before? If that is the best they can do, then perhaps they should go back to school themselves. But not in Florida.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
Ron DeSantis invites lawsuit after saying Satanists can't be chaplains in FL schoolsThe Friendly Atheist, By Hemant Mehta, on April 19, 2024https://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/ron-desantis-invites-lawsuit-afterThe panel engages in a spirited discussion dissecting Governor Ron DeSantis' recent controversial actions in Florida, particularly the signing of a bill allowing chaplains in public schools. Led by Helen, the panel critiques DeSantis' motives, highlighting concerns over constitutional violations and discrimination against non-theistic groups. Drawing parallels to DeSantis' previous confrontations, Infidel adds depth to the conversation, emphasizing the broader implications for secularism and individual freedoms. Emma offers insightful reflections on the intersection of religion and politics, drawing comparisons to the UK's evolving religious landscape. Throughout the discussion, the panel underscores the importance of defending democratic principles and safeguarding the separation of church and state against encroachments by religious extremism. Their impassioned advocacy serves as a rallying cry for civic engagement and collective action to uphold the values of freedom and democracy in the face of authoritarianism.In this lively discussion, the panel dissects the recent antics of Florida's Governor, Ron DeSantis, as he signs a bill allowing chaplains in public schools, sparking a firestorm of controversy. The conversation unravels against the backdrop of a Friendly Atheist article by H. Meta, dated April 19th, 2024, highlighting DeSantis' disregard for constitutional protections and the potential discrimination against non-theistic groups.Helen leads the charge, critiquing DeSantis' actions as a thinly veiled publicity stunt to distract from genuine issues plaguing Florida. Infidel adds depth to the discussion, drawing parallels between DeSantis' maneuvers and his previous clashes with Disney and "Mom's against Liberty." The panel expresses concern over the erosion of secularism and the encroachment of religious influence in public institutions.Emma offers a unique perspective, reflecting on the rise of Christian nationalism and its implications for individual freedoms. She raises poignant questions about the future trajectory of the United States, drawing comparisons to the UK's evolving religious landscape.As the conversation unfolds, the panel delves into the broader implications of DeSantis' actions, highlighting the slow erosion of constitutional principles and the danger of unchecked power. They sound a clarion call for vigilance in defending freedom of expression and safeguarding the separation of church and state.Through nuanced analysis and impassioned advocacy, the panel underscores the urgent need for civic engagement and collective action to preserve the foundational principles of democracy in the face of creeping theocracy.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.18.3 featuring Phoebe Rose, Emma Thorne, Infidel64 and Helen GreeneBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
‘How sick do they have to get?’ Doctors brace for US supreme court hearing on emergency abortionsThe Guardian, By Carter Sherman, on April 23, 2024https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/23/supreme-court-verdict-emergency-abortions-patients-doctorsThe Non-Prophets, Episode 23.18.2 featuring Phoebe Rose, Emma Thorne, Infidel64 and Helen GreeneThe discussion revolves around the complex interplay between federal and state laws regarding abortion rights in the United States. The Supreme Court is faced with adjudicating between the Biden Administration's stance favoring federal law and Idaho's insistence on prioritizing state law. This clash has significant implications for healthcare, especially concerning emergency room practices and abortion access across the country.The participants express deep concern and frustration with the situation. They highlight the inadequacy of laws rooted in Christian nationalism and the risks posed to women's health and autonomy. There's a sense of dismay at the disregard for medical expertise and the prioritization of ideological agendas over public health and individual rights.The conversation delves into legal intricacies, such as the precedence of federal law over state law and the role of the Supreme Court in interpreting and applying these laws. There's criticism of the court's perceived activism and disregard for established legal principles, particularly in recent abortion-related cases.The discussion also touches on the practical challenges faced by individuals seeking abortion, including financial and logistical barriers, especially for marginalized communities. The participants question the fairness and equity of state laws that restrict access to reproductive healthcare, particularly for those with limited resources.Overall, the dialogue reflects a sense of frustration with the erosion of abortion rights and the broader implications for healthcare access and individual autonomy in the United States.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
High court upholds top London school’s ban on prayer ritualsThe Guardian, By Sally Weale, on April 16, 2024https://www.theguardian.com/education/2024/apr/16/london-school-katharine-birbalsingh-prayer-rituals-ban-not-unlawful-high-courtThe discussion begins with an overview of a contentious situation involving a student in a UK school, Michaela's Community School, where prayer is prohibited. Despite fervent prayers, the high court upholds the school's ban on rituals, citing the importance of discipline and order. This case sparks a debate on the role of religion in UK education and school autonomy.The conversation delves into various perspectives. One participant expresses understanding, citing the parents' awareness of the school's policies and the educational value of facing such challenges. Another participant, expressing British cultural norms, finds the ban on religion in schools odd given the prevalence of religious schools and practices across the UK.They explore personal experiences with religious education, from attending Church of England schools to Catholic schools in the US. The participants reflect on the balance between religious expression and maintaining an inclusive educational environment.A legal perspective is introduced, discussing the judge's ruling on indirect discrimination and the application of the Equality Act. The judge upheld the school's ban, citing the aim of maintaining an inclusive and productive educational environment, despite acknowledging discrimination.The discussion extends to the practicality of accommodating religious practices within school schedules and the freedom of choice in selecting schools based on religious affiliation. They ponder hypothetical scenarios such as accommodating Ramadan fasting and Christian rituals.As the conversation concludes, they emphasize the need for viewers to form their own opinions on the matter and consider where they stand regarding the intersection of religious expression and education.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.18.1 featuring Phoebe Rose, Emma Thorne, Infidel64 and Helen GreeneBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
RECIPE FOR depression: Atheism and a smartphoneFarmersForum.com, By Patrick Meagher, on April 10, 2024https://farmersforum.com/recipe-for-depression-atheism-and-a-smart-phone/ In a discussion about an article penned by a Catholic bishop on mental health issues among youth, the participants dissect various aspects of his argument. The bishop attributes the crisis to factors like social media, drawing on psychologists like Jordan Peterson and Carl Jung. However, his argument is critiqued for its lack of evidence and reliance on outdated perspectives, such as quoting Jung, who passed away over 60 years ago. This leads to skepticism about the bishop's understanding of modern psychological dynamics.The discussion also touches on the bishop's attempt to link declining mental health to declining religious belief. Critics point out the irony of using religious ideology, such as original sin, which can contribute to low self-esteem, as a solution to depression. The bishop's avoidance of addressing issues within the church, like the history of sexual abuse scandals, is noted, highlighting a lack of self-reflection within religious institutions.Participants also challenge the bishop's assertion that atheism and smartphones are the primary causes of depression, finding it to be a diversion from more pertinent issues. There's a consensus that the bishop's arguments lack substance and fail to provide meaningful insights or solutions. They critique the article's manipulative structure, where the mention of atheism is strategically placed to evoke a reaction without substantial engagement.Overall, the discussion highlights the inadequacy of the bishop's arguments, which are perceived as outdated, lacking evidence, and ultimately serving to deflect attention away from systemic issues within religious institutions. Critics emphasize the need for more nuanced and evidence-based discussions on mental health, rather than relying on religious doctrine or scapegoating external factors.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.17.4 featuring Jimmy Jr., Richard Allen, Scott Dickie and Jonathan RoudabushBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
Tennessee lawmakers send bill to ban first-cousin marriages to governor,NBC NewsNBC News, By The Associated Press, on April 12, 2024https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tennessee-lawmakers-send-bill-ban-first-cousin-marriages-governor-rcna147524 The discussion delved into the complex interplay between government regulation, personal freedom, and societal norms surrounding marriage. It began with a report on Tennessee's recent legislation prohibiting marriage between first cousins, sparking a debate on the extent of government intervention in personal decisions. Proponents cited genetic risks associated with cousin marriage, while skeptics questioned the necessity of such legislation and highlighted inconsistencies compared to other marriage laws.Scott argued that while the government bears a responsibility to protect public health, especially regarding genetic disorders in offspring, it should not dictate who individuals can marry. He emphasized the importance of informed consent and suggested that government intervention should focus on protecting vulnerable populations, such as children, from coercion rather than regulating marriage choices.Richard raised concerns about child marriage and the need for age limitations to ensure informed consent, distinguishing between regulating marriage contracts and prohibiting marriages based on familial relationships. He also mentioned polygamy as another contentious issue, questioning whether outrage over cousin marriage should be extended to other non-traditional forms of marriage.Jonathan echoed the sentiment that government intervention should prioritize protecting individuals from coercion and ensuring informed consent, particularly for vulnerable populations. He stressed the need for education and access to reproductive healthcare rather than blanket restrictions on marriage.Overall, the discussion highlighted the tension between personal autonomy and government intervention in marriage decisions, with participants advocating for informed consent, protection of vulnerable populations, and a nuanced approach to regulation that balances individual freedom with public health concerns.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.17.3 featuring Jimmy Jr., Richard Allen, Scott Dickie and Jonathan RoudabushBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
The positives and negatives in LDS Church growthThe Salt Lake Tribune, By Justin McLellan, on April 13, 2024https://www.sltrib.com/religion/2024/04/13/jana-riess-positives-negatives-lds/ In this discussion, the focus was primarily on the interpretation of data regarding the growth trends of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS) and the broader implications for religious adherence and education. The conversation delved into the complexities of understanding statistical data, particularly in the context of religious demographics and societal influences such as the COVID-19 pandemic.The participants acknowledged the ambiguity surrounding the data on LDS membership growth, with conflicting narratives emerging from the statistics. While some suggest a decline in church attendance, others champion unwavering growth. This ambiguity underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of religious dynamics and the neutrality of data interpretation.Education emerged as a crucial factor influencing religious beliefs and critical thinking. Participants emphasized the importance of fostering skepticism and analytical thinking through education to counteract indoctrination and promote independent thought. They discussed challenges within the educational system, including budget constraints and standardized testing, which may hinder the development of critical thinking skills.The conversation also explored the potential manipulation of data to serve certain agendas, highlighting the importance of statistical literacy in discerning truth from misinformation. Participants underscored the need for transparency in data collection and analysis to ensure accurate representation and avoid misleading interpretations.Overall, the discussion underscored the complex interplay between data interpretation, education, and societal influences in shaping religious beliefs and attitudes. By promoting critical thinking and statistical literacy, individuals can navigate conflicting narratives and make informed decisions about their beliefs and interpretations of data.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.17.2 featuring Jimmy Jr., Richard Allen, Scott Dickie and Jonathan RoudabushBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
Vatican complains after French court rules in favor of nun dismissed from religious orderAP News,By Nicole Winfield, on April 13, 2024https://apnews.com/article/vatican-france-nun-pope-marie-ferreol-ouellet-937da5e4b91b3b591b72b9edeb4a1f76 The discussion centered on a French court ruling that held a Vatican official responsible for wrongfully dismissing a nun from a religious order, highlighting the Vatican's secretive process in ousting the nun. Despite the Vatican's claim of no notification of the verdict, the ruling was condemned as a violation of religious freedom. The investigation, led by Cardinal Mark W tasked by Pope Francis, resulted in the nun's expulsion in 2020, reflecting French courts' intervention in church matters to hold officials accountable for misconduct and cover-up.The panel discussed the implications of governments prioritizing religious organizations and whether they should be held to unique legal circumstances. While religious organizations may have internal procedures, they should not be above the law, especially considering historical instances of misconduct. France's intervention was seen as a step forward in asserting sovereignty and enforcing national laws, irrespective of religious influence.The conversation delved into the comparison between military and church authority, highlighting the difference in accountability and the need for religious organizations to adhere to secular laws. The panel debated whether the church's annoyance at state intervention was justified, considering the employer-employee relationship in the nun's case. There was acknowledgment of progress in holding the church accountable and the need to separate theological rule from civil authority.Jonathan referenced a study on child abuse by the Catholic Church in France, citing alarming figures of victims and minimal legal actions. This led to a broader discussion on church accountability and the importance of secular governance over theological rule. Richard emphasized the fundamental issue of employment relations in the nun's case and the larger context of the church's accountability to civil laws.Overall, the discussion underscored the significance of state intervention in holding religious organizations accountable and ensuring adherence to secular laws, particularly in cases of misconduct and abuse.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.17.1 featuring Jimmy Jr., Richard Allen, Scott Dickie and Jonathan RoudabushBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
Arizona GOP lawmaker lashes out at 'god-haters' who criticized abortion ban prayerFriendly Atheist, By Hemant Mehta, on Apr 11, 2024https://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/arizona-gop-lawmaker-lashes-out-atIn a recent ruling by the Arizona State Supreme Court, the state reverted to a Civil War-era law banning almost all abortions except in cases where the mother's life is at risk. This decision has ignited controversy, particularly due to the involvement of certain state senators who held a prayer circle, speaking in tongues on the Senate floor. This religious intrusion into government affairs has sparked outrage, with critics like Helen and Jason expressing frustration over the use of religious beliefs to shape policy, especially regarding women's reproductive rights.Senator Anthony Kern's leadership in the prayer circle has drawn criticism, particularly his labeling of dissenters as "God haters." This rhetoric echoes sentiments of persecution, deflecting from the real issue at hand: the erosion of reproductive rights and the intertwining of religion with governance. Infidel and Helen have raised concerns about the implications of such rhetoric, fearing its potential consequences for marginalized groups, including LGBTQ individuals.The decision to uphold such restrictive laws and the rhetoric used to defend them highlight deeper issues within the political landscape, where personal beliefs are wielded as tools of control. Infidel emphasizes the historical context, likening the situation to pre-Civil War ideologies, while Helen underscores the dangerous precedent of mixing religion with lawmaking. In the face of these challenges, there's a call to action for the current generation to push back against regressive policies and uphold the principles of democracy and secular governance.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.16.4 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Infidel64, Jason Friedman and Helen GreeneBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
This pastor's wedding nightThe Friendly Atheist, By Hemant Mehta, on Apr 03, 2024https://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/this-pastors-wedding-night-joke-epitomizesPastor Josh Howerton of LakePoint Church in Texas is facing backlash after delivering a misguided attempt at humor during a recent sermon. His suggestion to future brides to unquestionably obey their husbands on their wedding night has drawn widespread criticism for perpetuating harmful gender stereotypes and minimizing female agency. While intended as a joke, Howerton's comments highlight deeper issues within Evangelical culture, including the normalization of patriarchal attitudes and the disregard for women's autonomy.This story, reported by Hemant Mehta in "The Friendly Atheist" on April 3rd, 2024, sparked a conversation about patriarchy and purity culture. The rhetoric perpetuated by Howerton reflects a mindset deeply rooted in patriarchal traditions, where women are expected to submit unquestionably to men. This toxic attitude extends beyond evangelical circles and affects people of all backgrounds, reinforcing harmful gender norms and undermining women's autonomy.Additionally, the conversation touched upon problematic statements made by figures like Jesse Lee Peterson, who has been known to dismiss women's sexual pleasure as unnatural. This further highlights the pervasive nature of patriarchal attitudes and the normalization of sexism within certain communities.The discussion also delved into the importance of comprehensive sex education, emphasizing consent, communication, and mutual pleasure. In contrast to the patriarchal views propagated by Howerton and others, healthy relationships are built on equality, respect, and open dialogue.Ultimately, the incident involving Pastor Howerton serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing struggle against patriarchal ideologies and the importance of promoting gender equality and autonomy in all aspects of society.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.16.3 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Infidel64, Jason Friedman and Helen GreeneBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
Police shot Nakala Murry's young son. Now, she could lose custody of her kids.NPR, By Jonathan Franklin, on April 4, 2024https://www.npr.org/2024/04/05/1242953901/nakala-murry-custody-rights-aderrien-murry-shooting-mississippiThe transcript discusses a troubling case in Mississippi where a mother, Nakala Murray, faces the possibility of losing custody of her children after her 11-year-old son, Adarian Murray, was shot by a police officer in their home during a domestic incident. The Sunflower County officials accused Nakala of neglecting her children, alleging a history of domestic violence involving her ex-boyfriend, John Noden. Nichaela views the petition as harassment and retaliation for her lawsuit against the city of Indianola over her son's shooting. Attorney Carlos Mordeems deems the petition outlandish, emphasizing Nakala's status as a single mother. Despite no charges being filed against the officer involved, Nakala's custody battle unfolds amid ongoing legal proceedings.The discussion delves into the incident, highlighting that Adarian called 911 seeking help during the domestic incident but was shot by Sergeant Greg Capers upon exiting the room with his hands up. The participants express their dismay at Nakala potentially losing custody for being a victim of domestic abuse and commend her actions in a difficult situation. They criticize the system's targeting of marginalized communities, particularly people of color and single mothers, and discuss the lack of proper training and accountability within law enforcement.They argue that systemic issues, including poverty and lack of resources, contribute to higher crime rates in certain communities. The conversation extends to broader societal issues, such as hate crimes and racism, citing FBI statistics that show race-based bias as the primary motive for hate crimes. They emphasize the need for systemic change and accountability within law enforcement to address these injustices and prevent similar incidents in the future.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.16.2 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Infidel64, Jason Friedman and Helen GreeneBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
The Solar Eclipse Is the Super Bowl for ConspiracistsWIRED, By David Gilbert, on Apr 5, 2024https://www.wired.com/story/solar-eclipse-conspiracies/The conversation delved into the multifaceted world of conspiracy theories surrounding the total solar eclipse on April 8th. Infidel and the panel explored various theories, ranging from Masonic plots to bizarre beliefs about sacrifices at the Temple in Israel. The discussion highlighted how these theories intersect with religious fundamentalism, mental health issues, and the psychology of belief.Jason shared insights from a study linking belief in fake news to delusionality, dogmatism, and religious fundamentalism. He emphasized the role of skepticism in combating the tendency to believe in falsehoods, especially among those entrenched in fundamentalist ideologies. Helen discussed the psychological aspects of belief, noting how patterns and confirmation bias contribute to entrenched worldviews.Infidel provided a real-life example of the tragic consequences of extreme beliefs, citing the case of an influencer who fatally stabbed her partner and endangered her children due to apocalyptic fears tied to the eclipse. The panel underscored the dangers of unchecked beliefs leading to harmful actions, especially in the absence of adequate mental health support.The conversation also touched on how some exploit natural phenomena like eclipses to push political agendas or foster fear and control. They dissected the social conditioning that primes individuals to accept apocalyptic narratives and authoritarian messages, highlighting the pervasive influence of religious and political ideologies in shaping beliefs and behaviors.Ultimately, the discussion emphasized the need for critical thinking, skepticism, and mental health awareness to navigate the complex interplay of belief systems, social conditioning, and psychological factors. It underscored the importance of addressing underlying issues such as mental health disparities and religious fundamentalism to mitigate the harmful effects of conspiracy theories and extreme beliefs.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.16.1 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Infidel64, Jason Friedman and Helen GreeneBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
New Law Allowing Religion into Science Classrooms Is Dangerous for EveryoneScientific American, By Amanda L. Townley, on April 3, 2024https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-law-allowing-religion-into-science-classrooms-is-dangerous-for-everyone/#:~:text=But%20the%20legislative%20history%20of,in%20West%20Virginia's%20public%20schoolsThe discussion begins by dissecting the recent enactment of legislation in West Virginia, which permits teachers to address scientific theories, including evolution, in classrooms. This development prompts a multifaceted exploration of its ramifications, especially in terms of upholding the crucial tenet of separating religious influence from state-sponsored education.The conversation delves into the intriguing stance of a science educator who, despite embracing religious faith, advocates staunchly for the exclusion of religious teachings from the scientific curriculum. This nuanced perspective sparks a deeper examination of the potential discord between faith-based beliefs and empirically supported scientific principles.Participants in the discussion thoroughly analyze the implications of allowing religious ideology to permeate science education, highlighting the necessity of prioritizing evidence-based knowledge dissemination in science classrooms. They underscore the importance of nurturing an environment where students can explore and comprehend the complexities of the natural world without the imposition of religious dogma. Moreover, the conversation delves into the ethical considerations surrounding the intersection of faith and science, particularly concerning the integrity of educational practices and the preservation of intellectual freedom.The participants express concern over the motivations driving efforts to introduce religious teachings into science education, emphasizing the need to safeguard the integrity of scientific inquiry from ideological agendas. They emphasize the imperative of maintaining a clear demarcation between reality-based education and faith-based convictions, advocating for the protection of students' right to access accurate scientific information devoid of religious influence.Furthermore, the discussion touches upon the broader societal implications of blurring the boundaries between science and religion, urging policymakers to uphold secular educational standards while respecting individuals' religious beliefs.In conclusion, the conversation underscores the pivotal role of evidence-based reasoning in shaping educational policies, emphasizing the value of promoting critical thinking and scientific literacy among students. It underscores the importance of fostering an inclusive educational environment that respects diverse religious perspectives while upholding the primacy of scientific inquiry in advancing our understanding of the natural world.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.15.4 featuring Jimmy Jr, Eli Slack, Infidel64 and Scott DickieBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
Richard Dawkins says Christianity is "fundamentally decent," but Islam "is not"The Friendly Atheist, By Hemant Mehta , on April 2, 2024https://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/richard-dawkins-says-christianity?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=oa4eg&triedRedirect=true In this segment, the discussion revolves around a recent statement made by Richard Dawkins, a renowned evolutionary biologist and atheist, regarding his views on Christianity and Islam. Dawkins, known for his criticism of religion, recently expressed a softened stance towards Christianity while disparaging Islam during a radio interview. His comments have sparked debate about the cultural aspects of Christianity and the perceived superiority of one religion over the other.The conversation delves into whether individuals, particularly in Western societies, unconsciously favor Christianity over Islam due to cultural familiarity. The panelists explore their personal experiences and the influence of Christian upbringing on language, customs, and societal norms. They discuss the complexities of Dawkins' statements, questioning whether his bias towards Christianity undermines his credibility as a critic of religious extremism.The discussion expands to scrutinize the fundamental principles of Christianity and Islam, highlighting historical atrocities committed in the name of religion. Infidel emphasizes the harmful aspects of both faiths, rejecting the notion that one is inherently better than the other. Scott advocates for skepticism in evaluating religious beliefs and actions, urging Dawkins to maintain consistency in his critiques. Eli expresses skepticism towards Dawkins' influence, emphasizing the importance of critical self-reflection and continuous inquiry.The segment concludes with a reflection on the value of challenging preconceived notions and the ongoing pursuit of skepticism in navigating religious discourse.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.15.3 featuring Jimmy Jr, Eli Slack, Infidel64 and Scott DickieBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
Peru archbishop who sued 2 journalists over reports on abuses, financial corruption resigns earlyAP News, By BY NICOLE WINFIELD AND FRANKLIN BRICEÑO, on April 2, 2024https://apnews.com/article/vatican-sodalitium-peru-abuse-eguren-d6c3c253aa8218248910961bf8a3de4e In this segment, the discussion delves into yet another scandal involving child sexual abuse within the Catholic Church, this time in Peru. The panelists express frustration at the apparent impunity enjoyed by the Church, which seems to shield abusers from legal consequences. They question why the Church isn't held to the same standards as other organizations when it comes to handling such serious allegations. The conversation highlights the long history of abuse within this particular congregation, going back to its founder, and criticizes the Church's lack of effective action in addressing these issues.The resignation of the archbishop of this congregation raises suspicions, as it comes amid ongoing allegations of abuse and a supposed Vatican-led effort to rehabilitate the group.The panelists express skepticism about the Church's motives, questioning whether their attempts at rehabilitation are merely attempts to salvage their public image. They discuss the actions taken by the Church, such as hiring an expert on child sexual abuse and conducting internal investigations, but doubt the authenticity of these efforts, viewing them as superficial attempts at damage control rather than genuine attempts at accountability.The conversation turns to the concept of rehabilitation within the Church and whether it is even possible or appropriate, given the severity of the offenses committed.Panelists express outrage at the idea of allowing known abusers to return to positions of authority within the Church, arguing that such actions only perpetuate the cycle of abuse and undermine the trust of parishioners. They call for a fundamental change in the Church's approach to handling abuse allegations, advocating for greater transparency, accountability, and involvement of law enforcement authorities.In conclusion, the panelists emphasize the need for both grassroots and top-down efforts to address the systemic issues of abuse within the Catholic Church. They stress the importance of holding the Church accountable for its actions and ensuring that survivors of abuse receive justice and support. Despite their skepticism about the Church's willingness to change, they remain hopeful that continued pressure and advocacy may eventually lead to meaningful reform within the institution.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.15.2 featuring Jimmy Jr, Eli Slack, Infidel64 and Scott DickieBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
MAGA Pastor Says ‘200 Bibles’ Set Ablaze Outside His Church on Easter MorningThe Daily Beast, By AJ McDougall, on March 31, 2024https://www.thedailybeast.com/maga-pastor-greg-locke-says-200-bibles-set-ablaze-outside-his-tennessee-church-on-easter-morning The discourse gravitated around an unsettling incident that unfolded, implicating Pastor Locke in a contentious episode where approximately 200 Bibles were purportedly set ablaze outside his church premises, intriguingly transpiring on Easter morning, a day of profound significance in Christian tradition.Pastor Greg Locke is a figure of considerable notoriety, recognized for his propensity to court controversy through a series of provocative actions, including but not limited to highly publicized book burnings and his vocal political endorsements often interwoven within the fabric of his sermons. His approach has sparked a maelstrom of both adulation and condemnation, polarizing public opinion along ideological fault lines.The panelists engaged in a multifaceted exploration, endeavoring to untangle the intricate strands of this perplexing narrative. Central to their discourse was the question of intent: did the conflagration of the Bibles represent a calculated publicity stunt orchestrated by Pastor Locke himself, a brazen bid to galvanize attention and stoke the embers of controversy? Alternatively, was it perhaps an act of retaliation launched against him, a manifestation of simmering dissent fueled by the reverberations of his divisive rhetoric?This discussion extended beyond the realm of mere conjecture, delving into the nuanced legal and ethical dimensions inherent in such a contentious scenario. The panelists grappled with the thorny issue of whether the burning of the Bibles could be construed as constituting an act of violence or potentially categorized as a hate crime, thereby prompting reflection on the broader societal implications of such actions.Within the discourse, divergent perspectives emerged, each offering a unique lens through which to interpret the events at hand. Some contended that Pastor Locke's penchant for controversy and his unyielding commitment to his beliefs rendered him a lightning rod for attention, suggesting that the conflagration of the Bibles might indeed be viewed as a calculated ploy to thrust himself into the spotlight once more. Others, however, adopted a more critical stance, highlighting the deleterious ramifications of Pastor Locke's rhetoric and its potential to inflame tensions and provoke hostility.Yet amidst this cacophony of voices, a common thread emerged: an acknowledgment of the imperative to address conflicts and disparities through constructive dialogue and peaceful means, rather than succumbing to the seductive allure of destructive measures. In the final analysis, the discussion underscored the profound complexity of the situation, emphasizing the need for nuanced reflection and empathetic engagement as we navigate the turbulent waters of contemporary discourse.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.15.1 featuring Jimmy Jr, Eli Slack, Infidel64 and Scott DickieBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
Serial bigamist who posed as pastor had at least 10 wives he met in black churchesTexas Man Poses as Pastor, Sentenced for BigamyThe Christian Post, By By Leonardo Blair, on March 22, 2024https://www.christianpost.com/news/serial-bigamist-had-at-least-10-wives.html?utm_source=Daily&utm_campaign=Daily&utm_medium=newsletterThe Non-Prophets, Episode 23.14.4 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Jonathan Roudabush, Eli and Helen GreeneBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
Prayer, Bible lessons and a big red bus: How an Ohio group is bringing God to public schoolLifeWise Academy's Bible Classes in SchoolsNBC News, By By Mike Hixenbaugh, on March 25, 2024https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/lifewise-academy-public-school-christian-church-rcna142172The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.14.3 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Jonathan Roudabush, Eli Slack and Helen GreeneBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
A Michigan commissioner wants to prevent Satanists from giving an invocationFriendly Atheist , By Hemant Mehta, on March 25, 2024Battle for the Pulpit: Satanists vs. Christianshttps://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/a-michigan-commissioner-wants-to?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=oa4eg&triedRedirect=trueThe Non-Prophets, Episode 23.14.2 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Jonathan Roudabush, Eli and Helen GreeneBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
Erin Hawley: The Woman Arguing Against the Abortion PillHawley: Ranches to Roe BattleNew York Times/Yahoo News, By Elizabeth Dias and Abbie VanSickle, on March 26, 2024https://ca.news.yahoo.com/erin-hawley-woman-arguing-against-121736503.htmlThe Non-Prophets, Episode 23.14.1 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Jonathan Roudabush, Eli and Helen GreeneBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.