The Philosophy of Crime
Author: James Renner
Subscribed: 552Played: 8,439Description
Unravel the complexities of true crime through the insightful lens of "The Philosophy of Crime," an annual podcast series expertly hosted by James Renner, a distinguished journalist and acclaimed author renowned for his deep dives into the enigmatic world of unsolved mysteries. This podcast stands at the crossroads of classical philosophy and the compelling questions that fuel our fascination with true crime. Across six thought-provoking episodes released once a year, James explores the fundamental inquiries haunting the human psyche: What drives our obsession with true crime stories? Are lie detectors a reliable tool in the quest for truth? How does diplomatic immunity intersect with justice?
"The Philosophy of Crime" is more than a podcast; it's a philosophical exploration that seeks to illuminate the darkest aspects of human curiosity and societal norms. Each season, James Renner blends philosophical theories with real-world cases, offering listeners a unique perspective on the moral dilemmas and ethical questions that lurk behind the headlines. From the effectiveness of lie detection to the intricacies of legal exemptions and the nature of obsession, this podcast is an essential listen for anyone intrigued by the philosophical dimensions of crime and justice.
Tune in to "The Philosophy of Crime" for a yearly dose of compelling narratives and enlightening discussions that promise to challenge your views, provoke thought, and deepen your understanding of the philosophical underpinnings of true crime.
#truecrimepodcast #jamesrenner #philosophypodcast #philosophyofcrime
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Did you seriously just call Foucault and Derrida great thinkers?
You don't think evil exists?
Your reasoning is flawed in the categorical imperative. If you execute people for murder, that does not lead to everyone executing everyone else until only one person remains. Killing someone and murdering someone are two different things.
How can you look at the racial execution rate per capita without taking account of racial crime rate stats? That's very disingenuous.
There is a huge difference between killing someone and murdering someone. The Stanford experiment has been widely discredited.
there is a huge difference between killing someone and murdering someone.
What's weird is that I've been thinking about John Demjanjuk lately too. He actually popped into my mind after hearing the exoneration story of Jeffrey Deskovick on For Life podcast. The name sounded familiar, and all I could remember was that there was a guy from Cleveland who'd long been accused of being a Nazi, who had been deported to Germany.
Excellent podcast, my favorite
Hi, I find this podcast fascinating. Can we expect to have more uploaded episodes in the future? I was rather sad to see the last one was uploaded in April.